Designing gene delivery vectors for cardiovascular gene therapy

Genetic therapy in the cardiovascular system has been proposed for a variety of diseases ranging from prevention of vein graft failure to hypertension. Such diversity in pathogenesis requires the delivery of therapeutic genes to diverse cell types in vivo for varying lengths of time if efficient clinical therapies are to be developed. Data from extensive preclinical studies have been compiled and a certain areas have seen translation into large-scale clinical trials, with some encouraging reports. It is clear that progress within a number of disease areas is limited by a lack of suitable gene delivery vector systems through which to deliver therapeutic genes to the target site in an efficient, non-toxic manner. In general, currently available systems, including non-viral systems and viral vectors such as adenovirus (Ad) or adeno-associated virus (AAV), have a propensity to transduce non-vascular tissue with greater ease than vascular cells thereby limiting their application in cardiovascular disease. This problem has led to the development and testing of improved vector systems for cardiovascular gene delivery. Traditional viral and non-viral systems are being engineered to increase their efficiency of vascular cell transduction and diminish their affinity for other cell types through manipulation of vector:cell binding and the use of cell-selective promoters. It is envisaged that future use of such technology will substantially increase the efficacy of cardiovascular gene therapy.     

肿瘤基因治疗的靶向策略

对肿瘤组织的靶向性可以提高基因治疗的效果 ,避免对正常组织的损伤 ,并且能降低作为载体的微生物对机体的危害。对于瘤内注射的给药方法 ,靶向性似乎显得不是特别重要 ,但是如果要系统给药 ,靶向性是很关键的一个问题。靶向基因治疗肿瘤可以通过靶向基因导入和靶向基因表达来实现。近年来 ,在靶向基因导入方面的研究有很多进展 ,例如 ,用双亲性的桥连分子协助腺病毒和逆转录病毒靶向转导 ;在各种病毒载体的衣壳蛋白中插入靶向性的小肽或较大的多肽靶向结构域 ;增殖病毒作为一种很有前途的抗肿瘤制剂可有效地靶向杀伤肿瘤细胞。受体介导的DNA或DNA 脂质体复合物的靶向系统和其他一些靶向性的有疗效的载体 ,如细菌 ,也处于研究中。其中的一些载体已经进入临床实验。为了实现基因的靶向可调控表达 ,组织或肿瘤特异性的启动子和人工合成的可调控表达系统被用来调控治疗基因的表达。反义核酸、核酶以及脱氧核酶 (DNAzyme)被用来靶向抑制与肿瘤发生密切相关基因的表达。     

Targeted gene-delivery strategies for angiostatic cancer treatment

Gene therapy is one of the promising strategies in cancer treatment. Recent studies identified molecular targets on angiogenically activated endothelial cells that can be used to deliver gene-transfer vehicles to the tumor site specifically. Furthermore, non-viral vehicles are emerging as an alternative for traditional viral gene-therapy approaches. Here, we describe how viral and non-viral gene-transfer vehicles have been and can be modified to target tumor endothelial cells for anti-angiogenesis gene therapy. Improving the specificity and safety of existing gene-therapy vehicles will make angiogenesis-targeted cancer gene therapy a valuable tool in the clinical setting.     

Development of hybrid viral vectors for gene therapy

Adenoviral, retroviral/lentiviral, adeno-associated viral, and herpesviral vectors are the major viral vectors used in gene therapy. Compared with non-viral methods, viruses are highly-evolved, natural delivery agents for genetic materials. Despite their remarkable transduction efficiency, both clinical trials and laboratory experiments have suggested that viral vectors have inherent shortcomings for gene therapy, including limited loading capacity, immunogenicity, genotoxicity, and failure to support long-term adequate transgenic expression. One of the key issues in viral gene therapy is the state of the delivered genetic material in transduced cells. To address genotoxicity and improve the therapeutic transgene expression profile, construction of hybrid vectors have recently been developed. By adding new abilities or replacing certain undesirable elements, novel hybrid viral vectors are expected to outperform their conventional counterparts with improved safety and enhanced therapeutic efficacy. This review provides a comprehensive summary of current achievements in hybrid viral vector development and their impact on the field of gene therapy.     

Non-viral vectors in cystic fibrosis gene therapy: progress and challenges

Although the viability of cystic fibrosis (CF) gene transfer to airway epithelium has been demonstrated in vitro and in animal models, so far none of the clinical investigations using adenovirus, adeno-associated virus, lentivirus, cationic lipids or polymers has shown a persistent correction of the ion transport defects that occur in CF. Despite disappointing results, these studies have shown that non-viral vectors could represent a viable alternative for gene therapy in CF airway epithelium. The transfer efficiency of non-viral vectors is currently low, however, and thus these systems are not clinically relevant as yet. Before clinical application, several limitations encountered by non-viral delivery systems must be addressed. Recent progress has been made towards overcoming these limitations and towards making non-viral gene therapy a more realistic option for CF.     

体内基因转染技术在肝再生研究中的应用

肝脏是一个特殊的器官,不仅因为它独特的解剖结构和生理特征,而且它还具有无限的再生能力。在各种动物模型中,应用病毒或非病毒载体将肝细胞生长因子等基因转入体内,能增强肝再生能力,这就是肝脏基因转染技术在肝再生研究中的应用。未来的研究目标就是消除病毒载体的毒副作用和增加非病毒载体的转染率,这也是目前肝内基因转染技术中面临的主要难题;另一个研究目标就是用受体介导基因靶向肝转染,使转入基因在肝细胞中特异高表达。这些研究成果将有助于肝再生基因机制研究,以及将来临床基因治疗提供参考。     

Components of gene therapy experimentation that contribute to relative risk

Gene therapy is the purposeful delivery of genetic material to somatic cells for the purpose of treating disease or biomedical investigation. Either viral or non-viral vector methods can be used. The risk of collateral exposure of laboratory animal care personnel to gene therapy vectors is dependent on a number of factors. These factors are intrinsic to the gene therapy vector (the vehicle for genetic conveyance), product encoded by the genetic construct delivered, method of delivery, and immune status of the recipient. The component risks of gene therapy experiments can be analyzed to surmise the overall relative risk of the experiment. Knowledge of the components that contribute potential hazardous risk to a study can assist animal care staff in identifying area(s) where prudent practices should be focused. Gene therapy experiments involving viral vectors are generally performed at either biosafety level 2 or 3. The objective of this review is to report on various components of gene therapy experiments, focusing on characteristics of viral and non-viral vectors, to assist the laboratory animal science community in determining prudent biosafety practices.     

Non-viral gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: progress and challenges

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is one of the most common lethal, hereditary diseases of childhood. Since the identification of the genetic basis of this disorder, there has been the hope that a cure would be developed in the form of gene therapy. This has yet to be realized, but many different gene therapy approaches have seen dramatic advances in recent years. Although viral-mediated gene therapy has been at the forefront of the field, several non-viral gene therapy approaches have been applied to animal and cellular models of DMD. These include plasmid-mediated gene delivery, antisense-mediated exon skipping, and oligonucleotide-mediated gene editing. In the past several years, non-viral gene therapy has moved from the laboratory to the clinic. Advances in vector design, formulation, and delivery are likely to lead to even more rapid advances in the coming decade. Given the relative simplicity, safety, and cost-effectiveness of these methodologies, non-viral gene therapy continues to have great promise for future gene therapy approaches to the treatment of DMD.     

Design,preparation and application of nucleic acid delivery carriers

Gene delivery vectors must deliver their cargoes into the cytosol or the nucleus, where DNA or siRNA functions in vivo. Therefore it is crucial for the rational design of the nucleic acid delivery carriers. Compared with viral vectors, non-viral vectors have overcome some fatal defections in gene therapy. Whereas the most important issue for the non-viral vectors is the low transfection efficiency, which hinders the progress of non-viral carriers. Sparked by the structures of the virus and understanding of the process of virus infection, various biomimic structures of non-viral carriers were designed and prepared to improve the transfection issues in vitro and in vivo. However, less impressive results are achieved. In this review, we will investigate the evolution of the virus-mimicking carriers of nucleic acids for gene therapy, especially in cancer therapy; explore and discuss the relationship between the structures, materials and functions of the carriers, to provide guidance for establishing safe and highly efficient non-viral carriers for gene therapy.     

Multifunctional nanocomplexes for gene transfer and gene therapy

DNA formulated into aggregates with polycationic reagents are referred to by a variety of terms including non-viral vectors, synthetic vectors, lipoplexes, polyplexes and more recently nanoparticles. The capacity for delivery of multiple genes, genomic-sized constructs and siRNA delivery, with a diversity of possible formulations, as well as the possibilities of improved efficiency of in vivo gene deliveries, means that nanoparticles, or nanocomplexes to reflect self-assembling systems, will be investigated with increasing vigour in the coming years. This review briefly outlines the applications and challenges for nanoparticle technologies in the field of gene therapy then focuses on the development of a specific kind of formulation, receptor-targeted nanocomplex (RTN), that we have found to be particularly useful in our gene therapy research. An overriding guiding concept that has emerged in the development of synthetic nanodelivery systems is the idea to develop formulations and structures that mimic viruses, whilst retaining the safety elements of synthetic, non-viral systems. RTNs have been optimised and developed for airway epithelial transfection, leading towards gene therapy for cystic fibrosis and for vascular transfection in vein grafts used in bypass surgery. The modular design of the RTN platform further allows for the testing of specific hypotheses relating to the structure and functional role of components in the formation of stable particles and in the transfection pathway, leading to their ultimate disassembly in the nucleus.     

Advanced therapies for the treatment of hemophilia: future perspectives

Monogenic diseases are ideal candidates for treatment by the emerging advanced therapies, which are capable of correcting alterations in protein expression that result from genetic mutation. In hemophilia A and B such alterations affect the activity of coagulation factors VIII and IX, respectively, and are responsible for the development of the disease. Advanced therapies may involve the replacement of a deficient gene by a healthy gene so that it generates a certain functional, structural or transport protein (gene therapy); the incorporation of a full array of healthy genes and proteins through perfusion or transplantation of healthy cells (cell therapy); or tissue transplantation and formation of healthy organs (tissue engineering). For their part, induced pluripotent stem cells have recently been shown to also play a significant role in the fields of cell therapy and tissue engineering. Hemophilia is optimally suited for advanced therapies owing to the fact that, as a monogenic condition, it does not require very high expression levels of a coagulation factor to reach moderate disease status. As a result, significant progress has been possible with respect to these kinds of strategies, especially in the fields of gene therapy (by using viral and non-viral vectors) and cell therapy (by means of several types of target cells). Thus, although still considered a rare disorder, hemophilia is now recognized as a condition amenable to gene therapy, which can be administered in the form of lentiviral and adeno-associated vectors applied to adult stem cells, autologous fibroblasts, platelets and hematopoietic stem cells; by means of non-viral vectors; or through the repair of mutations by chimeric oligonucleotides. In hemophilia, cell therapy approaches have been based mainly on transplantation of healthy cells (adult stem cells or induced pluripotent cell-derived progenitor cells) in order to restore alterations in coagulation factor expression.     

Non-viral and hybrid vectors in human gene therapy: an update

Non-viral DNA vectors have several advantages over viral vectors. For example, virus production is expensive and there are safety concerns regarding viral manipulations. In addition, the size of the delivered plasmid is limited by the size of the viral capsid, whereas this is not a problem with non-viral vectors. The major disadvantage of using non-viral DNA delivery vectors, compared with their viral counterparts, is the low transfection efficiency. This has resulted in low levels of usage in clinical trials. Consequently, the majority of research into non-viral gene therapy has been focused on developing more efficient vectors.     

Novel Therapeutic Approaches for Various Cancer Types Using a Modified Sleeping Beauty-Based Gene Delivery System

Successful gene therapy largely depends on the selective introduction of therapeutic genes into the appropriate target cancer cells. One of the most effective and promising approaches for targeting tumor tissue during gene delivery is the use of viral vectors, which allow for high efficiency gene delivery. However, the use of viral vectors is not without risks and safety concerns, such as toxicities, a host immune response towards the viral antigens or potential viral recombination into the host''s chromosome; these risks limit the clinical application of viral vectors. The Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon-based system is an attractive, non-viral alternative to viral delivery systems. SB may be less immunogenic than the viral vector system due to its lack of viral sequences. The SB-based gene delivery system can stably integrate into the host cell genome to produce the therapeutic gene product over the lifetime of a cell. However, when compared to viral vectors, the non-viral SB-based gene delivery system still has limited therapeutic efficacy due to the lack of long-lasting gene expression potential and tumor cell specific gene transfer ability. These limitations could be overcome by modifying the SB system through the introduction of the hTERT promoter and the SV40 enhancer. In this study, a modified SB delivery system, under control of the hTERT promoter in conjunction with the SV40 enhancer, was able to successfully transfer the suicide gene (HSV-TK) into multiple types of cancer cells. The modified SB transfected cancer cells exhibited a significantly increased cancer cell specific death rate. These data suggest that our modified SB-based gene delivery system can be used as a safe and efficient tool for cancer cell specific therapeutic gene transfer and stable long-term expression.     

Non-viral gene therapy

Non-viral gene therapies are currently under development that employ drug-delivery methods for targeting genes to selected cells in the body, where they express therapeutic gene products. Various methods have been described for non-viral gene therapy, ranging from the direct intramuscular injection of purified DNA to the systemic administration of formulations comprising DNA and lipids, proteins, peptides, or polymers. Products for non-viral gene therapies are designed both for direct administration to patients by conventional routes and for expression of a therapeutic product over a finite period of time in a manner similar to conventional medicines. Initial preclinical and clinical studies indicate that non-viral gene delivery methods exhibit safety profiles similar to conventional pharmaceutical or biological products. Clinical trials have been proposed, or are currently under way, to assess the applicability of non-viral gene therapy for a variety of disorders, including cystic fibrosis, cancer, and peripheral vascular disease. Non-viral techniques may soon allow gene therapy to be applied in clinical practice alongside conventional medicines for the treatment of common diseases.     

Gene therapy: progress and challenges.

Gene therapy is the delivery of new genetic material into a patient's somatic cells for the treatment of disease and is made possible through the development of viral and non-viral gene transfer vectors. In the first five years of gene therapy, clinical studies failed to yield efficacy data with the vectors available at that time. The lack of consistent clinical benefit prompted the United States National Institute of Health Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee to evaluate gene therapy research and conclude that substantial improvements in gene transfer vectors were needed in the areas of vector safety and control of the level and duration of gene expression, and to increase the understanding of the biological interaction of gene transfer vectors with the host. We will describe the progress in development of gene delivery technology, focusing on improvements in vector safety, analysis of vector biodistribution and GMP manufacturing of viral and non-viral gene transfer systems over the last six years since the report. Whereas 5 years ago, investigators tested every vector for every potential disease indication, the accumulated database now enables investigators to select a single vector based upon it's known performance in a wide number of animal models and human clinical studies. We will also highlight several directions investigators have taken to improve the safety and efficacy of gene therapy vectors.     

New non-viral method for gene transfer into primary cells

The availability of genetically altered cells is an essential prerequisite for many scientific and therapeutic applications including functional genomics, drug development, and gene therapy. Unfortunately, the efficient gene transfer into primary cells is still problematic. In contrast to transfections of most cell lines, which can be successfully performed using a variety of methods, the introduction of foreign DNA into primary cells requires a careful selection of gene transfer techniques. Whereas viral strategies are time consuming and involve safety risks, non-viral methods proved to be inefficient for most primary cell types. The Nucleofector technology is a novel gene transfer technique designed for primary cells and hard-to-transfect cell lines. This non-viral gene transfer method is based on a cell type specific combination of electrical parameters and solutions. In this report, we show efficient transfer of DNA expression vectors and siRNA oligonucleotides into a variety of primary cell types from different species utilizing the Nucleofector technology, including human B-CLL cells, human CD34+ cells, human lymphocytes, rat cardiomyocytes, human, porcine, and bovine chondrocytes, and rat neurons.     

Lectin functionalized nanocarriers for gene delivery

Gene therapy has emerged as one of the most promising therapeutic methods to treat various diseases. However, inadequate gene transfection efficacy during gene therapy demands further development of more efficient gene delivery strategies. Targeting genetic material to specific sites of action endows numerous advantages over non-targeted delivery. An ample variety of non-viral gene delivery vectors have been developed in recent years owing to the safety issues raised by viral vectors. Non-viral gene delivery vectors containing specific targeting ligands on their surfaces have been reported to enhance the gene transfection efficiency via receptor-mediated endocytosis for gene delivery. Among various targeting moieties investigated, carbohydrates and lectins (carbohydrate-binding proteins) played an essential role in gene delivery via either direct or reverse lectin targeting strategies. Lectins have a specific carbohydrate binding domain that can bind specifically to the carbohydrates. This review sheds light on various gene delivery nanovectors conjugated with either lectins or carbohydrates for enhanced gene transfection.     

Enhancement of gene delivery to cancer cells by a retargeted adenovirus

The inefficiency of in vivo gene transfer using currently available vectors reflects a major hurdle in cancer gene therapy. Both viral and non-viral approaches that improve gene transfer efficiency have been described, but suffer from a number of limitations. Herein, a fiber-modified adenovirus, carrying the small peptide ligand on the capsid, was tested for the delivery of a transgene to cancer cells. The fiber-modified adenovirus was able to mediate the entry and expression of a beta-galactosidase into cancer cells with increased efficiency compared to the unmodified adenovirus. Particularly, the gene transfer efficiency was improved up to 5 times in OVCAR3 cells, an ovarian cancer cell line. Such transduction systems hold promise for delivering genes to transferrin receptor overexpressing cancer cells, and could be used for future cancer gene therapy.