Structures of the human eIF4E homologous protein, h4EHP, in its m7GTP-bound and unliganded forms

All eukaryotic cellular mRNAs contain a 5' m(7)GpppN cap. In addition to conferring stability to the mRNA, the cap is required for pre-mRNA splicing, nuclear export and translation by providing an anchor point for protein binding. In translation, the interaction between the cap and the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) is important in the recruitment of the mRNAs to the ribosome. Human 4EHP (h4EHP) is a homologue of eIF4E. Like eIF4E it is able to bind the cap but it appears to play a different cellular role, possibly being involved in the fine-tuning of protein expression levels. Here we use X-ray crystallography and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to investigate further the binding of cap analogues and peptides to h4EHP. m(7)GTP binds to 4EHP 200-fold more weakly than it does to eIF4E with the guanine base sandwiched by a tyrosine and a tryptophan instead of two tryptophan residues as seen in eIF4E. The tyrosine resides on a loop that is longer in h4EHP than in eIF4E. The consequent conformational difference between the proteins allows the tyrosine to mimic the six-membered ring of the tryptophan in eIF4E and adopt an orientation that is similar to that seen for equivalent residues in other non-homologous cap-binding proteins. In the absence of ligand the binding site is incompletely formed with one of the aromatic residues being disordered and the side-chain of the other adopting a novel conformation. A peptide derived from the eIF4E inhibitory protein, 4E-BP1 binds h4EHP 100-fold less strongly than eIF4E but in a similar manner. Overall the data, combined with sequence analyses of 4EHP from evolutionary diverse species, strongly support the hypothesis that 4EHP plays a physiological role utilizing both cap-binding and protein-binding functions but which is distinct from eIF4E.     

A Novel 4EHP-GIGYF2 Translational Repressor Complex Is Essential for Mammalian Development

The binding of the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) to the mRNA 5' cap structure is a rate-limiting step in mRNA translation initiation. eIF4E promotes ribosome recruitment to the mRNA. In Drosophila, the eIF4E homologous protein (d4EHP) forms a complex with binding partners to suppress the translation of distinct mRNAs by competing with eIF4E for binding the 5' cap structure. This repression mechanism is essential for the asymmetric distribution of proteins and normal embryonic development in Drosophila. In contrast, the physiological role of the mammalian 4EHP (m4EHP) was not known. In this study, we have identified the Grb10-interacting GYF protein 2 (GIGYF2) and the zinc finger protein 598 (ZNF598) as components of the m4EHP complex. GIGYF2 directly interacts with m4EHP, and this interaction is required for stabilization of both proteins. Disruption of the m4EHP-GIGYF2 complex leads to increased translation and perinatal lethality in mice. We propose a model by which the m4EHP-GIGYF2 complex represses translation of a subset of mRNAs during embryonic development, as was previously reported for d4EHP.     

Identification in the ancient protist Giardia lamblia of two eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E homologues with distinctive functions

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) binds to the m(7)GTP of capped mRNAs and is an essential component of the translational machinery that recruits the 40S small ribosomal subunit. We describe here the identification and characterization of two eIF4E homologues in an ancient protist, Giardia lamblia. Using m(7)GTP-Sepharose affinity column chromatography, a specific binding protein was isolated and identified as Giardia eIF4E2. The other homologue, Giardia eIF4E1, bound only to the m(2,2,7)GpppN structure. Although neither homologue can rescue the function of yeast eIF4E, a knockdown of eIF4E2 mRNA in Giardia by a virus-based antisense ribozyme decreased translation, which was shown to use m(7)GpppN-capped mRNA as a template. Thus, eIF4E2 is likely the cap-binding protein in a translation initiation complex. The same knockdown approach indicated that eIF4E1 is not required for translation in Giardia. Immunofluorescence assays showed wide distribution of both homologues in the cytoplasm. But eIF4E1 was also found concentrated and colocalized with the m(2,2,7)GpppN cap, 16S-like rRNA, and fibrillarin in the nucleolus-like structure in the nucleus. eIF4E1 depletion from Giardia did not affect mRNA splicing, but the protein was bound to Giardia small nuclear RNAs D and H known to have an m(2,2,7)GpppN cap, thus suggesting a novel function not yet observed among other eIF4Es in eukaryotes.     

The eukaryotic mRNA decapping protein Dcp1 interacts physically and functionally with the eIF4F translation initiation complex

Dcp1 plays a key role in the mRNA decay process in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, cleaving off the 5' cap to leave an end susceptible to exonucleolytic degradation. The eukaryotic initiation factor complex eIF4F, which in yeast contains the core components eIF4E and eIF4G, uses the cap as a binding site, serving as an initial point of assembly for the translation apparatus, and also binds the poly(A) binding protein Pab1. We show that Dcp1 binds to eIF4G and Pab1 as free proteins, as well as to the complex eIF4E-eIF4G-Pab1. Dcp1 interacts with the N-terminal region of eIF4G but does not compete significantly with eIF4E or Pab1 for binding to eIF4G. Most importantly, eIF4G acts as a function-enhancing recruitment factor for Dcp1. However, eIF4E blocks this effect as a component of the high affinity cap-binding complex eIF4E-eIF4G. Indeed, cooperative enhancement of the eIF4E-cap interaction stabilizes yeast mRNAs in vivo. These data on interactions at the interface between translation and mRNA decay suggest how events at the 5' cap and 3' poly(A) tail might be coupled.     

Phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) at Ser209 is not required for protein synthesis in vitro and in vivo.

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) is essential for efficient translation of the vast majority of capped cellular mRNAs; it binds the 5'-methylated guanosine cap of mRNA and serves as a nucleation point for the assembly of the 48S preinitiation complex. eIF4E is phosphorylated in vivo at residue 209 of the human sequence. The phosphorylated form is often regarded as the active state of the protein, with ribosome-associated eIF4E enriched for the phosphorylated form and increased phosphorylation often correlated with upregulation of rates of protein synthesis. However, the only reported measured effect attributable to phosphorylation at the physiological site has been a relatively small increase in the affinity of eIF4E for the mRNA m7GTP cap structure. Here, we provide data to suggest that phosphorylation of eIF4E at Ser209 is not required for translation. eIF4E that is modified such that it cannot be phosphorylated (Ser209-->Ala), is unimpaired in its ability to restore translation to an eIF4E-dependent in vitro translation system. In addition, both the wild-type and mutant forms of eIF4E interact equally well with eIF4G, with the phosphorylation of eIF4E not required to effect the change in conformation of eIF4G that is required for efficient cleavage of eIF4G by L-protease. Furthermore, we show that wild-type and phosphorylation-site variants of eIF4E protein are equally able to rescue the lethal phenotype of eIF4E deletion in S. cerevisiae.     

High affinity RNA for mammalian initiation factor 4E interferes with mRNA-cap binding and inhibits translation

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) consists of three polypeptides (eIF4A, eIF4G, and eIF4E) and is responsible for recruiting ribosomes to mRNA. eIF4E recognizes the mRNA 5'-cap structure (m7GpppN) and plays a pivotal role in control of translation initiation, which is the rate-limiting step in translation. Overexpression of eIF4E has a dramatic effect on cell growth and leads to oncogenic transformation. Therefore, an inhibitory agent to eIF4E, if any, might serve as a novel therapeutic against malignancies that are caused by aberrant translational control. Along these lines, we developed two RNA aptamers, aptamer 1 and aptamer 2, with high affinity for mammalian eIF4E by in vitro RNA selection-amplification. Aptamer 1 inhibits the cap binding to eIF4E more efficiently than the cap analog m7GpppN or aptamer 2. Consistently, aptamer 1 inhibits specifically cap-dependent in vitro translation while it does not inhibit cap-independent HCV IRES-directed translation initiation. The interaction between eIF4E and eIF4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1), however, was not inhibited by aptamer 1. Aptamer 1 is composed of 86 nucleotides, and the high affinity to eIF4E is affected by deletions at both termini. Moreover, relatively large areas in the aptamer 1 fold are protected by eIF4E as determined by ribonuclease footprinting. These findings indicate that aptamers can achieve high affinity to a specific target protein via global conformational recognition. The genetic mutation and affinity study of variant eIF4E proteins suggests that aptamer 1 binds to eIF4E adjacent to the entrance of the cap-binding slot and blocks the cap-binding pocket, thereby inhibiting translation initiation.     

Interaction of three Caenorhabditis elegans isoforms of translation initiation factor eIF4E with mono- and trimethylated mRNA 5' cap analogues

Translation initiation factor eIF4E binds the m(7)G cap of eukaryotic mRNAs and mediates recruitment of mRNA to the ribosome during cap-dependent translation initiation. This event is the rate-limiting step of translation and a major target for translational control. In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, about 70% of genes express mRNAs with an unusual cap structure containing m(3)(2,2,7)G, which is poorly recognized by mammalian eIF4E. C. elegans expresses five isoforms of eIF4E (IFE-1, IFE-2, etc.). Three of these (IFE-3, IFE-4 and IFE-5) were investigated by means of spectroscopy and structural modelling based on mouse eIF4E bound to m(7)GDP. Intrinsic fluorescence quenching of Trp residues in the IFEs by iodide ions indicated structural differences between the apo and m(7)G cap bound proteins. Fluorescence quenching by selected cap analogues showed that only IFE-5 forms specific complexes with both m(7)G- and m(3)(2,2,7)G-containing caps (K(as) 2 x 10(6) M(-1) to 7 x 10(6) M(-1)) whereas IFE-3 and IFE-4 discriminated strongly in favor of m(7)G-containing caps. These spectroscopic results quantitatively confirm earlier qualitative data derived from affinity chromatography. The dependence of K(as) on pH indicated optimal cap binding of IFE-3, IFE-4 and IFE-5 at pH 7.2, lower by 0.4 pH units than that of eIF4E from human erythrocytes. These results provide insight into the molecular mechanism of recognition of structurally different caps by the highly homologous IFEs.     

Intrinsic RNA Binding by the Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4F Depends on a Minimal RNA Length but Not on the m7G Cap

The eukaryotic initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) is thought to be the first factor to bind mRNA during 7-methylguanosine (m⁷G) cap-dependent translation initiation. The multipartite eIF4F contains the cap-binding protein eIF4E, and it is assumed that eIF4F binds mRNAs primarily at the 5′ m⁷G cap structure. We have analyzed equilibrium binding of rabbit eIF4F to a series of diverse RNAs and found no impact of the 5′-cap on the stability of eIF4F-RNA complexes. However, eIF4F preferentially and cooperatively binds to RNAs with a minimum length of ∼60 nucleotides in vitro. Furthermore, translation activity in rabbit reticulocyte lysate is strongly inhibited by RNAs exceeding this length, but not by shorter ones, consistent with the notion that eIF4F in its physiological environment preferentially binds longer RNAs, too. Collectively, our results indicate that intrinsic RNA binding by eIF4F depends on a minimal RNA length, rather than on cap recognition. The nonetheless essential m⁷G cap may either function at steps subsequent to eIF4F-RNA binding, or other factors facilitate preferential binding of eIF4F to the m⁷G cap.     

Cap-binding activity of an eIF4E homolog from Leishmania

All eukaryotic mRNAs possess a 5'-cap (m(7)GpppN) that is recognized by a family of cap-binding proteins. These participate in various processes, such as RNA transport and stabilization, as well as in assembly of the translation initiation complex. The 5'-cap of trypanosomatids is complex; in addition to 7-methyl guanosine, it includes unique modifications on the first four transcribed nucleotides, and is thus denoted cap-4. Here we analyze a cap-binding protein of Leishmania, in an attempt to understand the structural features that promote its binding to this unusual cap. LeishIF4E-1, a homolog of eIF4E, contains the conserved cap-binding pocket, similar to its mouse counterpart. The mouse eIF4E has a higher K(as) for all cap analogs tested, as compared with LeishIF4E-1. However, whereas the mouse eIF4E shows a fivefold higher affinity for m(7)GTP than for a chemically synthesized cap-4 structure, LeishIF4E-1 shows similar affinities for both ligands. A sequence alignment shows that LeishIF4E-1 lacks the region that parallels the C terminus in the murine eIF4E. Truncation of this region in the mouse protein reduces the difference that is observed between its binding to m(7)GTP and cap-4, prior to this deletion. We hypothesize that variations in the structure of LeishIF4E-1, possibly also the absence of a region that is homologous to the C terminus of the mouse protein, promote its ability to interact with the cap-4 structure. LeishIF4E-1 is distributed in the cytoplasm, but its function is not clear yet, because it cannot substitute the mammalian eIF4E in a rabbit reticulocyte in vitro translation system.     

The potyviral virus genome-linked protein VPg forms a ternary complex with the eukaryotic initiation factors eIF4E and eIF4G and reduces eIF4E affinity for a mRNA cap analogue

The virus protein linked to the genome (VPg) of plant potyviruses is a 25-kDa protein covalently attached to the genomic RNA 5' end. It was previously reported that VPg binds specifically to eIF4E, the mRNAcap-binding protein of the eukaryotic translation initiation complex. We performed a spectroscopic study of the interactions between lettuce eIF4E and VPg from lettuce mosaic virus (LMV). The cap analogue m7GDP and VPg bind to eIF4E at two distinct sites with similar affinity (K(d) = 0.3 microm). A deeper examination of the interaction pathway showed that the binding of one ligand induces a decrease in the affinity for the other by a factor of 15. GST pull-down experiments from plant extracts revealed that VPg can specifically trap eIF4G, the central component of the complex required for the initiation of protein translation. Our data suggest that eIF4G recruitment by VPg is indirectly mediated through VPg-eIF4E association. The strength of interaction between eIF4E and pep4G, the eIF4E-binding domain on eIF4G, was increased significantly by VPg. Taken together these quantitative data show that VPg is an efficient modulator of eIF4E biochemical functions.     

A new translational regulator with homology to eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G.

Translation initiation in eukaryotes is facilitated by the cap structure, m7GpppN (where N is any nucleotide). Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) is a cap binding protein complex that consists of three subunits: eIF4A, eIF4E and eIF4G. eIF4G interacts directly with eIF4E and eIF4A. The binding site of eIF4E resides in the N-terminal third of eIF4G, while eIF4A and eIF3 binding sites are present in the C-terminal two-thirds. Here, we describe a new eukaryotic translational regulator (hereafter called p97) which exhibits 28% identity to the C-terminal two-thirds of eIF4G. p97 mRNA has no initiator AUG and translation starts exclusively at a GUG codon. The GUG-initiated open reading frame (907 amino acids) has no canonical eIF4E binding site. p97 binds to eIF4A and eIF3, but not to eIF4E. Transient transfection experiments show that p97 suppresses both cap-dependent and independent translation, while eIF4G supports both translation pathways. Furthermore, inducible expression of p97 reduces overall protein synthesis. These results suggest that p97 functions as a general repressor of translation by forming translationally inactive complexes that include eIF4A and eIF3, but exclude eIF4E.     

Complex formation between potyvirus VPg and translation eukaryotic initiation factor 4E correlates with virus infectivity

The interaction between the viral protein linked to the genome (VPg) of turnip mosaic potyvirus (TuMV) and the translation eukaryotic initiation factor eIF(iso)4E of Arabidopsis thaliana has previously been reported. eIF(iso)4E binds the cap structure (m(7)GpppN, where N is any nucleotide) of mRNAs and has an important role in the regulation in the initiation of translation. In the present study, it was shown that not only did VPg bind eIF(iso)4E but it also interacted with the eIF4E isomer of A. thaliana as well as with eIF(iso)4E of Triticum aestivum (wheat). The interaction domain on VPg was mapped to a stretch of 35 amino acids, and substitution of an aspartic acid residue found within this region completely abolished the interaction. The cap analogue m(7)GTP, but not GTP, inhibited VPg-eIF(iso)4E complex formation, suggesting that VPg and cellular mRNAs compete for eIF(iso)4E binding. The biological significance of this interaction was investigated. Brassica perviridis plants were infected with a TuMV infectious cDNA (p35Tunos) and p35TuD77N, a mutant which contained the aspartic acid substitution in the VPg domain that abolished the interaction with eIF(iso)4E. After 20 days, plants bombarded with p35Tunos showed viral symptoms, while plants bombarded with p35TuD77N remained symptomless. These results suggest that VPg-eIF(iso)4E interaction is a critical element for virus production.     

Structural insights into the allosteric effects of 4EBP1 on the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E plays key roles in cap-dependent translation and mRNA export. These functions rely on binding the 7-methyl-guanosine moiety (5'cap) on the 5'-end of all mRNAs. eIF4E is regulated by proteins such as eIF4G and eIF4E binding proteins (4EBPs) that bind the dorsal surface of eIF4E, distal to the cap binding site, and modulate cap binding activity. Both proteins increase the affinity of eIF4E for 5'cap. Our understanding of the allosteric effects and structural underpinnings of 4EBP1 or eIF4G binding can be advanced by obtaining structural data on cap-free eIF4E bound to one of these proteins. Here, we report the crystal structure of apo-eIF4E and cap-free eIF4E in complex with a 4EBP1 peptide. We also monitored 4EBP1 binding to cap-free eIF4E in solution using NMR. Together, these studies suggest that 4EBP1 transforms eIF4E into a cap-receptive state. NMR methods were also used to compare the allosteric routes activated by 4EBP1, eIF4G, and the arenavirus Z protein, a negative regulator of cap binding. We observed chemical shift perturbation at the dorsal binding site leading to alterations in the core of the protein, which were ultimately communicated to the unoccupied cap binding site of eIF4E. There were notable similarities between the routes taken by 4EBP1 and eIF4G and differences from the negative regulator Z. Thus, binding of 4EBP1 or eIF4G allosterically drives alterations throughout the protein that increase the affinity of eIF4E for the 5'cap.     

Structural basis for competitive inhibition of eIF4G-Mnk1 interaction by the adenovirus 100-kilodalton protein

Translation of most cellular mRNAs involves cap binding by the translation initiation complex. Among this complex of proteins are cap-binding protein eIF4E and the eIF4E kinase Mnk1. Cap-dependent mRNA translation generally correlates with Mnk1 phosphorylation of eIF4E when both are bound to eIF4G. During the late phase of adenovirus (Ad) infection translation of cellular mRNA is inhibited, which correlates with displacement of Mnk1 from eIF4G by the viral 100-kDa (100K) protein and dephosphorylation of eIF4E. Here we describe the molecular mechanism for 100K protein displacement of Mnk1 from eIF4G and elucidate a structural basis for eIF4G interaction with Mnk1 and 100K proteins and Ad inhibition of cellular protein synthesis. The eIF4G-binding site is located in an N-terminal 66-amino-acid peptide of 100K which is sufficient to bind eIF4G, displace Mnk1, block eIF4E phosphorylation, and inhibit eIF4F (cap)-dependent cellular mRNA translation. Ad 100K and Mnk1 proteins possess a common eIF4G-binding motif, but 100K protein binds more strongly to eIF4G than does Mnk1. Unlike Mnk1, for which binding to eIF4G is RNA dependent, competitive binding by 100K protein is RNA independent. These data support a model whereby 100K protein blocks cellular protein synthesis by coopting eIF4G and cap-initiation complexes regardless of their association with mRNA and displacing or blocking binding by Mnk1, which occurs only on preassembled complexes, resulting in dephosphorylation of eIF4E.     

Structural Insights into Parasite eIF4E Binding Specificity for m7G and m2,2,7G mRNA Caps

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E recognizes the mRNA cap, a key step in translation initiation. Here we have characterized eIF4E from the human parasite Schistosoma mansoni. Schistosome mRNAs have either the typical monomethylguanosine (m⁷G) or a trimethylguanosine (m^2,2,7G) cap derived from spliced leader trans-splicing. Quantitative fluorescence titration analyses demonstrated that schistosome eIF4E has similar binding specificity for both caps. We present the first crystal structure of an eIF4E with similar binding specificity for m⁷G and m^2,2,7G caps. The eIF4E·m⁷GpppG structure demonstrates that the schistosome protein binds monomethyl cap in a manner similar to that of single specificity eIF4Es and exhibits a structure similar to other known eIF4Es. The structure suggests an alternate orientation of a conserved, key Glu-90 in the cap-binding pocket that may contribute to dual binding specificity and a position for mRNA bound to eIF4E consistent with biochemical data. Comparison of NMR chemical shift perturbations in schistosome eIF4E on binding m⁷GpppG and m^2,2,7GpppG identified key differences between the two complexes. Isothermal titration calorimetry demonstrated significant thermodynamics differences for the binding process with the two caps (m⁷G versus m^2,2,7G). Overall the NMR and isothermal titration calorimetry data suggest the importance of intrinsic conformational flexibility in the schistosome eIF4E that enables binding to m^2,2,7G cap.