衰老过程中大白鼠脾细胞的DNA单链断裂与重接能力的变化

 DNA被紫外线损伤后,由DNA切除修复酶切除嘧啶二聚体,随之以另一条正常的DNA链为模板修复合成DNA片段,最后由DNA连接酶将新合成的DNA片与原有的DNA链连接。本文用荧光法测定DNA修复过程中DNA单链的断裂及重接能力与衰老的关系。结果表明,不同年龄大鼠脾细胞均具有修复DNA单链断裂的能力,DNA单链断裂重接的能力与年龄有相关性,断乳鼠及青年鼠的脾细胞当保温至30min时,即开始了DNA链的重接,保温90min后则恢复到原有水平;而老年鼠脾细胞保温至90min时才开始DNA链的重接,保温150min,尚未恢复到原有水平。还发现,断乳鼠及老年鼠脾细胞的单链DNA含量高于青年鼠。     

Sirtuins家族在DNA损伤修复中的作用

Sirtuins家族蛋白是一类依赖NAD的去乙酰化酶,属于第Ш类去乙酰化酶(HDACs),哺乳动物Sirtuins家族成员共有7个(SIRT1-7),其主要具有去乙酰化酶的活性,可以使多种蛋白发生去乙酰化,进而参与DNA的损伤修复、基因的转录调控、细胞凋亡、代谢及衰老等诸多生物进程。本文主要对Sirtuins家族在DNA损伤修复中的作用及其相关机制进行阐述。     

DNA修复的表观遗传学调控

表观遗传学信息的改变是导致人类肿瘤形成的重要因素之一．基因组的稳定性经常会受到DNA损伤的威胁．然而,高度致密的染色质结构却极大地妨碍了DNA修复的进行．因此,真核生物细胞中必须有一个精确的机制来克服染色质这一天然的屏障．其中,组蛋白的共价修饰和ATP-依赖的染色质重塑通过改变染色质的结构,对DNA修复进程起着关键的调控作用．介绍了DNA修复过程中,发生在表观遗传学方面的主要调控过程,特别阐述了在DNA双链断裂损伤应答和修复过程中,组蛋白修饰和染色质重塑方面最新的研究进展,并对今后的发展方向进行了讨论．     

组蛋白H2B单泛素化参与DNA损伤修复的调控机制

作为一种重要的组蛋白修饰形式,H2B的单泛素化(uH2B)广泛地参与DNA复制、基因的表达与转录、DNA损伤修复及异染色质维持等生物学事件.在裂殖酵母中,H2B的单泛素化发生在其羧基端的119位赖氨酸(K119),并依赖于Rhp6/Bre1泛素连接酶复合体.研究表明,uH2B通过破坏H2A/H2B二聚体的结构促进mRNA在转录过程中的延伸,同时促进H3K4的三甲基化激活基因的表达及参与DNA损伤修复.本研究发现,Rhp6能够对核糖核苷酸还原酶抑制基因(Spd1)位点进行活跃的染色质修饰,促进H2B的单泛素化并抑制基因表达,从而促进dNTP的合成并调控DNA复制及损伤修复.重要的是,本研究发现,该过程不依赖于H3K4而决定于H3K9的三甲基化.同时uH2B直接在DNA双链断裂位点富集,通过改变染色质的结构参与DNA损伤修复,该过程中可能存在其他更为复杂的分子机制.     

Chromatin remodeling and repair of DNA double-strand breaks

Eukaryotic cells have developed conserved mechanisms to efficiently sense and repair DNA damage that results from constant chromosomal lesions. DNA repair has to proceed in the context of chromatin, and both histone-modifiers and ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers have been implicated in this process. Here, we review the current understanding and new hypotheses on how different chromatin-modifying activities function in DNA repair in yeast and metazoan cells.     

RNF8/RNF168信号通路在DNA损伤修复中的作用

细胞内DNA会受部分外界因素(如紫外辐射,电离辐射和化学毒素)和内部因素(如复制错误)的影响而发生损伤,包括DNA双链断裂、DNA错配和DNA交链等。DNA损伤发生后,损伤部位会被一些蛋白识别,进而招募一系列蛋白至损伤部位,形成一个修复系统。DNA双链断裂是最严重的一种DNA损伤,错误修复往往导致疾病的发生。DNA双链断裂(double strand break, DSB)后,细胞启动RNF8/RNF168信号通路进行修复。RNF8和RNF168是这条通路的枢纽蛋白;53BP和BRCA1是关键的效应蛋白,决定着DSB修复的方式;组蛋白泛素化、磷酸化和甲基化等翻译后修饰是这条通路顺利进行的基本条件;染色质重塑、泛素化酶/去泛素化酶平衡和蛋白稳定性是这条通路的主要调节方式。本综述对RNF8/RNF168信号通路进行了梳理总结,希望其能对相关研究者起到参考作用。     

Chromatin structure analysis enables detection of DNA insertions into the mammalian nuclear genome

BackgroundGenetically modified organisms (GMOs) have numerous biomedical, agricultural and environmental applications. Development of accurate methods for the detection of GMOs is a prerequisite for the identification and control of authorized and unauthorized release of these engineered organisms into the environment and into the food chain. Current detection methods are unable to detect uncharacterized GMOs, since either the DNA sequence of the transgene or the amino acid sequence of the protein must be known for DNA-based or immunological-based detection, respectively.MethodsHere we describe the application of an epigenetics-based approach for the detection of mammalian GMOs via analysis of chromatin structural changes occurring in the host nucleus upon the insertion of foreign or endogenous DNA.ResultsImmunological methods combined with DNA next generation sequencing enabled direct interrogation of chromatin structure and identification of insertions of various size foreign (human or viral) DNA sequences, DNA sequences often used as genome modification tools (e.g. viral sequences, transposon elements), or endogenous DNA sequences into the nuclear genome of a model animal organism.ConclusionsThe results provide a proof-of-concept that epigenetic approaches can be used to detect the insertion of endogenous and exogenous sequences into the genome of higher organisms where the method of genetic modification, the sequence of inserted DNA, and the exact genomic insertion site(s) are unknown.General significanceMeasurement of chromatin dynamics as a sensor for detection of genomic manipulation and, more broadly, organism exposure to environmental or other factors affecting the epigenomic landscape are discussed.     

Chromatin structure in double strand break repair

Cells are under constant assault by endogenous and environmental DNA damaging agents. DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) sever entire chromosomes and pose a major threat to genome integrity as a result of chromosomal fragment loss or chromosomal rearrangements. Exogenous factors such as ionizing radiation, crosslinking agents, and topoisomerase poisons, contribute to break formation. DSBs are associated with oxidative metabolism, form during the normal S phase, when replication forks collapse and are generated during physiological processes such as V(D)J recombination, yeast mating type switching and meiosis. It is estimated that in mammalian cells ∼10 DSBs per cell are formed daily. If left unrepaired DSBs can lead to cell death or deregulated growth, and cancer development. Cellular response to DSB damage includes mechanisms to halt the progression of the cell cycle and to restore the structure of the broken chromosome. Changes in chromatin adjacent to DNA break sites are instrumental to the DNA damage response (DDR) with two apparent ends: to control compaction and to bind repair and signaling molecules to the lesion. Here, we review the key findings related to each of these functions and examine their cross-talk.     

Unraveling DNA Repair in Human: Molecular Mechanisms and Consequences of Repair Defect

Cellular genomes are vulnerable to an array of DNA-damaging agents, of both endogenous and environmental origin. Such damage occurs at a frequency too high to be compatible with life. As a result cell death and tissue degeneration, aging and cancer are caused. To avoid this and in order for the genome to be reproduced, these damages must be corrected efficiently by DNA repair mechanisms. Eukaryotic cells have multiple mechanisms for the repair of damaged DNA. These repair systems in humans protect the genome by repairing modified bases, DNA adducts, crosslinks and double-strand breaks. The lesions in DNA are eliminated by mechanisms such as direct reversal, base excision and nucleotide excision. The base excision repair eliminates single damaged-base residues by the action of specialized DNA glycosylases and AP endonucleases. Nucleotide excision repair excises damage within oligomers that are 25 to 32 nucleotides long. This repair utilizes many proteins to remove the major UV-induced photoproducts from DNA, as well as other types of modified nucleotides. Different DNA polymerases and ligases are utilized to complete the separate pathways. The double-strand breaks in DNA are repaired by mechanisms that involve DNA protein kinase and recombination proteins. The defect in one of the repair protein results in three rare recessive syndromes: xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome, and trichothiodystrophy. This review describes the biochemistry of various repair processes and summarizes the clinical features and molecular mechanisms underlying these disorders.     

DNA Damage Checkpoint, Damage Repair, and Genome Stability

Genomic DNA is under constant attack from both endogenous and exogenous sources of DNA damaging agents. Without proper care, the ensuing DNA damages would lead to alteration of genomic structure thus affecting the faithful transmission of genetic information. During the process of evolution, organisms have acquired a series of mechanisms responding to and repairing DNA damage, thus assuring the maintenance of genome stability and faithful transmission of genetic information. DNA damage checkpoint is one such important mechanism by which, in the face of DNA damage, a cell can respond to amplified damage signals, either by actively halting the cell cycle until it ensures that critical processes such as DNA replication or mitosis are complete or by initiating apoptosis as a last resort. Over the last decade, complex hierarchical interactions between the key components like ATM/ATR in the checkpoint pathway and various other mediators, effectors including DNA damage repair proteins have begun to emerge. In the meantime, an intimate relationship between mechanisms of damage checkpoint pathway, DNA damage repair, and genome stability was also uncovered. Reviewed hereinare the recent findings on both the mechanisms of activation of checkpoint pathways and their coordination with DNA damage repair machinery as well as their effect on genomic integrity.     

DNA损伤检验点与损伤修复及基因组稳定性

生物有机体基因组DNA经常会受到内源或外源因素的影响而导致结构发生变化,产生损伤;在长期进化过程中,有机体也相应形成了一系列应对与修复损伤DNA,并维持染色体基因组正常结构功能的机制。其中DNA损伤检验点（DNA damage checkpoint）就是在感应DNA损伤的基础上,对损伤感应信号进行转导,或引起细胞周期的暂停,从而使细胞有足够的时间对损伤DNA进行修复,或最终导致细胞发生凋亡。DNA损伤检验点信号转导途径是一个高度保守的信号感应过程,整个途径大致可以分为损伤感应、信号传递及信号效应3个组成部分。其中3-磷脂酰肌醇激酶家族类成员ATM（ataxia-telangiectasia mutated）和ATR（ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3-related）活性的增加构成整个途径活化的第一步。它们通过激活下游的效应激酶,Chk2／Chk1,通过协同作用许多其他调控细胞周期、DNA复制、DNA损伤修复及细胞凋亡等过程的蛋白质因子来实现细胞对DNA损伤的高度协调反应。近十几年,随着此领域研究的不断深入,人们逐步揭示了DNA损伤检验点途径发生过程中,各种核心组分通过与不同调节因子、效应因子及DNA损伤修复蛋白间的复杂相互作用,以实现监测感应异常DNA结构并实施相应反应的机制;其中,检验点衔接因子（mediators）及染色质结构,尤其是核小体组蛋白的共价修饰在调控ATM／ATR活性,促进ATM／ATR与底物间的相互作用以及介导DNA损伤位点周围染色质区域上多蛋白复合物在时间与空间上的动态形成发挥着重要的作用。同时,人们也开始发现DNA损伤检验点途径与DNA损伤修复、基因组稳定性以及肿瘤发生等过程之间某些内在的联系。该反应途径在通过协调细胞针对DNA损伤做出各种反应的基础上,直接或间接地参与或调控DNA损伤修复过程,并与DNA损伤修复途径协同作用最终保证染色体基凶组结构的完整性,而检验点途径的改变,则会引起基因组不稳定的发生,包括从突变频率的提高到大范围的染色体重排,以及染色体数量的畸变。如：突变发生在肿瘤形成早期,会大大增加肿瘤发生的几率。文章将对DNA损伤检验点途径机制及其对DNA损伤修复、基因组稳定性影响的最新进展进行综述。     

竹红菌甲素光敏作用所致的HeLa细胞DNA单链断裂重接的研究

本文采用羟基磷灰石离心法对竹红菌甲素光敏作用所致的HeLa细胞DNA的单链断裂进行荧光定量测定。以单链DNA的含量变化衡量DNA链断裂程度及其修复活性,并与γ射线的作用进行了比较。细胞经γ射线和甲素的光敏作用后,DNA产生单链断裂,当细胞存活率为0.1时,前者是6.0×10~(-10)断裂/道尔顿,后者是2.3×10~(-10)断裂/道尔顿,两者之比为2.8。细胞本身具有修复能力,当最初的单链断裂频率相等时,γ射线处理的细胞其DNA单链断裂重接能力高于光敏作用的细胞。后者的修复能力能被羟基脲、放线菌素D及丁酸钠等所抑制。细胞修复能力的差别指出两种作用产生的单链断裂的化学性质有重要差别。     

蛋白激酶CK2与DNA断裂修复

蛋白激酶CK2（酪蛋白激酶Ⅱ）是真核细胞中普遍存在的一种信使非依赖的丝氨酸／苏氨酸蛋白激酶,它底物众多,功能广泛。DNA断裂修复是一个涉及很多种酶和蛋白的过程,CK2在其中起着很重要的作用。     

Chromatin Regulation of DNA Damage Repair and Genome Integrity in the Central Nervous System

With the continued extension of lifespan, aging and age-related diseases have become a major medical challenge to our society. Aging is accompanied by changes in multiple systems. Among these, the aging process in the central nervous system is critically important but very poorly understood. Neurons, as post-mitotic cells, are devoid of replicative associated aging processes, such as senescence and telomere shortening. However, because of the inability to self-replenish, neurons have to withstand challenge from numerous stressors over their lifetime. Many of these stressors can lead to damage of the neurons' DNA. When the accumulation of DNA damage exceeds a neuron's capacity for repair, or when there are deficiencies in DNA repair machinery, genome instability can manifest. The increased mutation load associated with genome instability can lead to neuronal dysfunction and ultimately to neuron degeneration. In this review, we first briefly introduce the sources and types of DNA damage and the relevant repair pathways in the nervous system (summarized in Fig. 1). We then discuss the chromatin regulation of these processes and summarize our understanding of the contribution of genomic instability to neurodegenerative diseases.     

DNA end resection by CtIP and exonuclease 1 prevents genomic instability

End resection of DNA-which is essential for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by homologous recombination-relies first on the partnership between MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN) and CtIP, followed by a processive step involving helicases and exonucleases such as exonuclease 1 (EXO1). In this study, we show that the localization of EXO1 to DSBs depends on both CtIP and MRN. We also establish that CtIP interacts with EXO1 and restrains its exonucleolytic activity in vitro. Finally, we show that on exposure to camptothecin, depletion of EXO1 in CtIP-deficient cells increases the frequency of DNA-PK-dependent radial chromosome formation. Thus, our study identifies new functions of CtIP and EXO1 in DNA end resection and provides new information on the regulation of DSB repair pathways, which is a key factor in the maintenance of genome integrity.     

Regulation of the DNA Damage Response to DSBs by Post-Translational Modifications

Damage to the genetic material can affect cellular function in many ways. Therefore, maintenance of the genetic integrity is of primary importance for all cells. Upon DNA damage, cells respond immediately with proliferation arrest and repair of the lesion or apoptosis. All these consequences require recognition of the lesion and transduction of the information to effector systems. The accomplishment of DNA repair, but also of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis furthermore requires protein-protein interactions and the formation of larger protein complexes. More recent research shows that the formation of many of these aggregates depends on post-translational modifications. In this article, we have summarized the different cellular events in response to a DNA double strand break, the most severe lesion of the DNA.     

Roles of chromatin remodellers in DNA double strand break repair

Now that we have a good understanding of the DNA double strand break (DSB) repair mechanisms and DSB-induced damage signalling, attention is focusing on the changes to the chromatin environment needed for efficient DSB repair. Mutations in chromatin remodelling complexes have been identified in cancers, making it important to evaluate how they impact upon genomic stability. Our current understanding of the DSB repair pathways suggests that each one has distinct requirements for chromatin remodelling. Moreover, restricting the extent of chromatin modifications could be a significant factor regulating the decision of pathway usage. In this review, we evaluate the distinct DSB repair pathways for their potential need for chromatin remodelling and review the roles of ATP-driven chromatin remodellers in the pathways.     

Ionizing radiation-induced DNA injury and damage detection in patients with breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women. Radiotherapy is frequently used in patients with breast cancer, but some patients may be more susceptible to ionizing radiation, and increased exposure to radiation sources may be associated to radiation adverse events. This susceptibility may be related to deficiencies in DNA repair mechanisms that are activated after cell-radiation, which causes DNA damage, particularly DNA double strand breaks. Some of these genetic susceptibilities in DNA-repair mechanisms are implicated in the etiology of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (pathologic mutations in the BRCA 1 and 2 genes), but other less penetrant variants in genes involved in sporadic breast cancer have been described. These same genetic susceptibilities may be involved in negative radiotherapeutic outcomes. For these reasons, it is necessary to implement methods for detecting patients who are susceptible to radiotherapy-related adverse events. This review discusses mechanisms of DNA damage and repair, genes related to these functions, and the diagnosis methods designed and under research for detection of breast cancer patients with increased radiosensitivity.