Functions of Fun30 Chromatin Remodeler in Regulating Cellular Resistance to Genotoxic Stress

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Fun30 chromatin remodeler has recently been shown to facilitate long-range resection of DNA double strand break (DSB) ends, which proceeds homologous recombination (HR). This is believed to underlie the role of Fun30 in promoting cellular resistance to DSB inducing agent camptothecin. We show here that Fun30 also contributes to cellular resistance to genotoxins methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and hydroxyurea (HU) that can stall the progression of DNA replication. We present evidence implicating DNA end resection in Fun30-dependent MMS-resistance. On the other hand, we show that Fun30 deletion suppresses the MMS- and HU-sensitivity of cells lacking the Rad5/Mms2/Ubc13-dependent error-free DNA damage tolerance mechanism. This suppression is not the result of a reduction in DNA end resection, and is dependent on the key HR component Rad51. We further show that Fun30 negatively regulates the recovery of rad5Δ mutant from MMS induced G2/M arrest. Therefore, Fun30 has two functions in DNA damage repair: one is the promotion of cellular resistance to genotoxic stress by aiding in DNA end resection, and the other is the negative regulation of a Rad51-dependent, DNA end resection-independent mechanism for countering replicative stress. The latter becomes manifest when Rad5 dependent DNA damage tolerance is impaired. In addition, we find that the putative ubiquitin-binding CUE domain of Fun30 serves to restrict the ability of Fun30 to hinder MMS- and HU-tolerance in the absence of Rad5.     

Enrichment of Cdk1-cyclins at DNA double-strand breaks stimulates Fun30 phosphorylation and DNA end resection

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are one of the most cytotoxic types of DNA lesion challenging genome integrity. The activity of cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk1 is essential for DSB repair by homologous recombination and for DNA damage signaling. Here we identify the Fun30 chromatin remodeler as a new target of Cdk1. Fun30 is phosphorylated by Cdk1 on Serine 28 to stimulate its functions in DNA damage response including resection of DSB ends. Importantly, Cdk1-dependent phosphorylation of Fun30-S28 increases upon DNA damage and requires the recruitment of Fun30 to DSBs, suggesting that phosphorylation increases in situ at the DNA damage. Consistently, we find that Cdk1 and multiple cyclins become highly enriched at DSBs and that the recruitment of Cdk1 and cyclins Clb2 and Clb5 ensures optimal Fun30 phosphorylation and checkpoint activation. We propose that the enrichment of Cdk1-cyclin complexes at DSBs serves as a mechanism for enhanced targeting and modulating of the activity of DNA damage response proteins.     

Synthetic viability genomic screening defines Sae2 function in DNA repair

DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair by homologous recombination (HR) requires 3′ single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) generation by 5′ DNA-end resection. During meiosis, yeast Sae2 cooperates with the nuclease Mre11 to remove covalently bound Spo11 from DSB termini, allowing resection and HR to ensue. Mitotic roles of Sae2 and Mre11 nuclease have remained enigmatic, however, since cells lacking these display modest resection defects but marked DNA damage hypersensitivities. By combining classic genetic suppressor screening with high-throughput DNA sequencing, we identify Mre11 mutations that strongly suppress DNA damage sensitivities of sae2Δ cells. By assessing the impacts of these mutations at the cellular, biochemical and structural levels, we propose that, in addition to promoting resection, a crucial role for Sae2 and Mre11 nuclease activity in mitotic DSB repair is to facilitate the removal of Mre11 from ssDNA associated with DSB ends. Thus, without Sae2 or Mre11 nuclease activity, Mre11 bound to partly processed DSBs impairs strand invasion and HR.     

The MRN complex promotes DNA repair by homologous recombination and restrains antigenic variation in African trypanosomes

Homologous recombination dominates as the major form of DNA repair in Trypanosoma brucei, and is especially important for recombination of the subtelomeric variant surface glycoprotein during antigenic variation. RAD50, a component of the MRN complex (MRE11, RAD50, NBS1), is central to homologous recombination through facilitating resection and governing the DNA damage response. The function of RAD50 in trypanosomes is untested. Here we report that RAD50 and MRE11 are required for RAD51-dependent homologous recombination and phosphorylation of histone H2A following a DNA double strand break (DSB), but neither MRE11 nor RAD50 substantially influence DSB resection at a chromosome-internal locus. In addition, we reveal intrinsic separation-of-function between T. brucei RAD50 and MRE11, with only RAD50 suppressing DSB repair using donors with short stretches of homology at a subtelomeric locus, and only MRE11 directing DSB resection at the same locus. Finally, we show that loss of either MRE11 or RAD50 causes a greater diversity of expressed VSG variants following DSB repair. We conclude that MRN promotes stringent homologous recombination at subtelomeric loci and restrains antigenic variation.     

Cell cycle-dependent positive and negative functions of Fun30 chromatin remodeler in DNA damage response

The evolutionally conserved Fun30 chromatin remodeler in Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been shown to contribute to cellular resistance to genotoxic stress inflicted by camptothecin (CPT), methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and hydroxyurea (HU). Fun30 aids in extensive DNA resection of DNA double stranded break (DSB) ends, which is thought to underlie its role in CPT-resistance. How Fun30 promotes MMS- or HU-resistance has not been resolved. Interestingly, we have recently found Fun30 to also play a negative role in cellular tolerance to MMS and HU in the absence of the Rad5-dependent DNA damage tolerance pathway. In this report, we show that Fun30 acts to down regulate Rad9-dependent DNA damage checkpoint triggered by CPT or MMS, but does not affect Rad9-independent intra-S phase replication checkpoint induced by MMS or HU. These results support the notion that Fun30 contributes to cellular response to DSBs by preventing excessive DNA damage checkpoint activation in addition to its role in facilitating DNA end resection. On the other hand, we present evidence suggesting that Fun30’s negative function in MMS- and HU-tolerance in the absence of Rad5 is not related to its regulation of checkpoint activity. Moreover, we find Fun30 to be cell cycle regulated with its abundance peaking in G2/M phase of the cell cycle. Importantly, we demonstrate that artificially restricting Fun30 expression to G2/M does not affect its positive or negative function in genotoxin-resistance, but confining Fun30 to S phase abolishes its functions. These results indicate that both positive and negative functions of Fun30 in DNA damage response occur mainly in G2/M phase.     

Functional Interplay between the 53BP1-Ortholog Rad9 and the Mre11 Complex Regulates Resection,End-Tethering and Repair of a Double-Strand Break

The Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 nuclease complex, together with Sae2, initiates the 5′-to-3′ resection of Double-Strand DNA Breaks (DSBs). Extended 3′ single stranded DNA filaments can be exposed from a DSB through the redundant activities of the Exo1 nuclease and the Dna2 nuclease with the Sgs1 helicase. In the absence of Sae2, Mre11 binding to a DSB is prolonged, the two DNA ends cannot be kept tethered, and the DSB is not efficiently repaired. Here we show that deletion of the yeast 53BP1-ortholog RAD9 reduces Mre11 binding to a DSB, leading to Rad52 recruitment and efficient DSB end-tethering, through an Sgs1-dependent mechanism. As a consequence, deletion of RAD9 restores DSB repair either in absence of Sae2 or in presence of a nuclease defective MRX complex. We propose that, in cells lacking Sae2, Rad9/53BP1 contributes to keep Mre11 bound to a persistent DSB, protecting it from extensive DNA end resection, which may lead to potentially deleterious DNA deletions and genome rearrangements.     

Overcoming the chromatin barrier to end resection

Repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination requires Repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination requires 5′-3′ resection of the DNA ends to create 3′ single-stranded DNA tails. While much progress has been made in identifying the proteins that directly participate in end resection, how this process occurs in the context of chromatin is not well understood. Two papers in Nature report that Fun30, a poorly characterized member of the Swi2/Snf2 family of chromatin remodelers, plays a role in end processing by facilitating the Exo1 and Sgs1-Dna2 resection pathways.DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are highly cytotoxic lesions that must be repaired appropriately to prevent the formation of deleterious chromosome rearrangements associated with tumorigenesis. Cells use two major pathways to repair DSBs: homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Repair by HR requires a homologous donor duplex and is considered a high-fidelity process, whereas the homology-independent end joining pathway involves re-ligation of the broken ends and is more error prone. A critical determinant of repair pathway choice that commits cells to HR instead of NHEJ is the initiation of 5′-3′ resection of the DSB ends¹. Genetic studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identified the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 (Xrs2 is known as NBS1 or NBN in human) complex and Sae2 as key factors in the initiation of resection by removing oligonucleotides from the 5′ ends to form short 3′ single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) tails, while the Exo1 exonuclease or the Sgs1 helicase functioning with the Dna2 endonuclease promote extensive resection in a redundant manner^2,3,4. Resection has been reconstituted in vitro with these proteins^5,6,7; however, additional factors must be present in vivo to facilitate resection in the context of chromatin.Previous studies have suggested that cells use both histone modifying and remodeling complexes to relax chromatin and hence facilitate DNA repair. After sensing of a DSB by the MRX complex, the Tel1 kinase (ATM in human) is activated and phosphorylates histone H2A over a large region from the break site, followed by histone acetylation that unwinds chromatin and facilitates the recruitment of remodeling complexes⁸. ATP-dependent remodelers are large multi-subunit complexes that couple ATP hydrolysis to movement of histones or nucleosomes, including exchange or incorporation of core histones or histone variants, eviction of histones or nucleosomes, and repositioning or sliding of nucleosomes, thereby modifying chromatin structure⁹. Several chromatin remodeling complexes, including INO80, SWR1, SWI/SNF and RSC in budding yeast, have been reported to participate in the DNA damage response. It has been proposed that INO80 facilitates the eviction or sliding of nucleosomes in the immediate vicinity of the break site to allow 5′-3′ strand resection¹⁰. The SWR1 complex was suggested to exchange modified histones after repair, while SWI/SNF may facilitate clearing of nucleosomes surrounding the break site prior to Rad51-mediated strand invasion⁸. RSC is believed to affect resection initiation by facilitating Mre11 binding⁹.Two recent studies report that Fun30, a poorly characterized ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler, promotes DNA end resection in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Both groups identified Fun30 by genome-wide screens for mutants with increased frequencies of recombination between a transformed linear DNA fragment and homologous chromosomal sequences. Chen et al.¹¹ found that deletion of FUN30 caused increased gene targeting, while Costelloe et al.¹² found higher break-induced replication and gap repair efficiencies in the fun30Δ mutant, properties shared by the resection mutants sgs1Δ and exo1Δ. Using several different assays to monitor the formation of ssDNA at endonuclease-induced DSBs, both groups demonstrated that Fun30 promotes extensive resection by Exo1-dependent and Sgs1-Dna2-dependent pathways (Figure 1). Indeed, both the fun30Δsgs1Δ and fun30Δexo1Δ double mutants exhibited a more severe resection defect than any of the three single mutants^11,12.Open in a separate windowFigure 1The involvement of chromatin remodelers in DSB end resection. Resection initiation is stimulated by RSC and to a lesser extent by INO80. Fun30 works with RPA, Dna2 and Exo1 to promote extensive resection, possibly through overcoming the resection barrier formed by Rad9-bound chromatin.The effect of Fun30 on end resection could be direct or indirect. Evidence in support of a direct role was provided by both studies showing that Fun30 localized to DSBs and along the DNA from the break site with similar kinetics as Sgs1, Dna2 and Exo1^11,12. Furthermore, Chen et al.¹¹ showed that Fun30 co-immunoprecipitates with RPA, Dna2 and Exo1, and enrichment of these resection factors at DSBs was reduced in the fun30Δ mutant. In addition, overexpression of Exo1 in the fun30Δ strain was able to rescue both resection and resistance to the topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin (CPT)¹². These data suggest a direct involvement of Fun30 in long-range end resection, possibly through its interaction with extensive resection factors. It remains to be determined whether Fun30 directly recruits the resection machinery, or Fun30-mediated chromatin remodeling facilitates access of resection proteins to ssDNA.Importantly, the ATPase activity of Fun30, which is essential for its chromatin remodeling activity¹³, was found to be required for efficient resection and resistance to CPT^11,12, indicating a correlation between the two processes. Chen et al.¹¹ reported impaired recruitment of Fun30 to DSBs in the resection-defective mre11Δ and sgs1Δexo1Δ mutants, suggesting that Fun30-mediated chromatin remodeling is coupled with resection. Consistently, ChIP analysis of histone H3 and H2B occupancy around an endonuclease-induced DSB showed the same trend as resection in wild-type, fun30Δ and sgs1Δexo1Δ cells^11,12. Further studies are needed to investigate which one is the causal process, histone eviction or resection. Although histone loss appeared to be slower in fun30Δ and sgs1Δexo1Δ than in wild-type cells, it could be due to impaired long-range resection. Thus Fun30 does not seem to function via evicting histones. It remains to be determined how Fun30 remodels chromatin structure to facilitate resection.Costelloe et al.¹² extended their findings to human cells by showing that SMARCAD1, the potential human counterpart of Fun30, participates in end resection. SMARCAD1 co-localizes with γH2AX to DSBs and the pattern of its accumulation at DSBs is similar to that of Exo1. Knockdown of SMARCAD1 caused a dramatic reduction in ionizing radiation-induced ssDNA formation and RPA loading, indicating impaired resection. Accordingly, cells depleted of SMARCAD1 displayed hypersensitivity to genotoxic drugs and reduced HR.Previous studies suggested that the ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling complexes, INO80, RSC and SWR, affect resection. Chen et al.¹¹ sought to characterize the genetic interaction of these remodelers with Fun30 in promoting resection. Of all the single mutants, fun30Δ showed the strongest phenotype. Deleting components of the INO80 or RSC complexes together with Fun30 further delayed resection and elimination of all three remodeling factors resulted in a severe resection defect, indicating that Fun30 is the primary activity with RSC and INO80 playing redundant roles (Figure 1).A further clue to the mechanism by which Fun30 promotes resection was revealed by its genetic interaction with Rad9, a histone-bound checkpoint mediator known to inhibit resection. Surprisingly, rad9Δ was able to suppress the resection defect of fun30Δ¹¹, suggesting that Fun30 is able to overcome the barrier to resection by Rad9-bound chromatin. Consistent with this hypothesis, elimination of Fun30 led to more Rad9 accumulation at DSBs. Understanding how Fun30 is recruited to DSBs and how it recruits other factors is likely to shed some light on its role in resection. γH2A is required for the recruitment of INO80 and SWR⁸, while recruitment of RSC absolutely requires Mre11 and partially depends on yKu70¹⁴. It will be interesting to know whether Fun30 directly interacts with γH2A and Rad9, since Rad9 is partly recruited by γH2A. According to Chen et al., recruitment of Fun30 and extensive resection factors to DSBs occurs in a mutually dependent manner. One possible explanation for this paradox is that some initial binding of extensive resection factors facilitates Fun30 localization, which in turn remodels the chromatin and makes it more accessible for more resection factors, forming a positive feedback loop.As more ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers with roles in DNA DSB repair are identified, more questions regarding their apparent functional redundancy are raised. Why do cells need so many complexes to remodel chromatin during DSB repair? How is their sequential recruitment to DSBs regulated and does the apparent redundancy reflect the ordered recruitment? Is recruitment of the early- and late-acting chromatin remodelers coordinated? Do the chromatin remodelers that facilitate end resection participate in later steps of repair, such as invasion of the donor locus by the Rad51-ssDNA complex and resolution of recombination intermediates?     

Mapping yeast mitotic 5′ resection at base resolution reveals the sequence and positional dependence of nucleases in vivo

Resection of the 5′-terminated strand at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is the critical regulated step in the transition to homologous recombination. Recent studies have described a multi-step model of DSB resection where endonucleolytic cleavage mediated by Mre11 and Sae2 leads to further degradation mediated by redundant pathways catalyzed by Exo1 and Sgs1/Dna2. These models have not been well tested at mitotic DSBs in vivo because most methods used to monitor resection cannot precisely map early cleavage events. Here we report resection monitoring with high-throughput sequencing using molecular identifiers, allowing exact counting of cleaved 5′ ends at base resolution. Mutant strains, including exo1Δ, mre11-H125N and exo1Δ sgs1Δ, revealed a major Mre11-dependent cleavage position 60–70 bp from the DSB end whose exact position depended on local sequence. They further revealed an Exo1-dependent pause point approximately 200 bp from the DSB. Suppressing resection extension in exo1Δ sgs1Δ yeast exposed a footprint of regions where cleavage was restricted within 119 bp of the DSB. These results provide detailed in vivo views of prevailing models of DSB resection and extend them to show the combined influence of sequence specificity and access restrictions on Mre11 and Exo1 nucleases.     

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rif1 cooperates with MRX-Sae2 in promoting DNA-end resection

Diverse roles in DNA metabolism have been envisaged for budding yeast and mammalian Rif1. In particular, yeast Rif1 is involved in telomere homeostasis, while its mammalian counterpart participates in the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Here, we show that Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rif1 supports cell survival to DNA lesions in the absence of MRX or Sae2. Furthermore, it contributes to the nucleolytic processing (resection) of DSBs. This Rif1-dependent control of DSB resection becomes important for DSB repair by homologous recombination when resection activities are suboptimal.     

Sae2 Function at DNA Double-Strand Breaks Is Bypassed by Dampening Tel1 or Rad53 Activity

The MRX complex together with Sae2 initiates resection of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to generate single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) that triggers homologous recombination. The absence of Sae2 not only impairs DSB resection, but also causes prolonged MRX binding at the DSBs that leads to persistent Tel1- and Rad53-dependent DNA damage checkpoint activation and cell cycle arrest. Whether this enhanced checkpoint signaling contributes to the DNA damage sensitivity and/or the resection defect of sae2Δ cells is not known. By performing a genetic screen, we identify rad53 and tel1 mutant alleles that suppress both the DNA damage hypersensitivity and the resection defect of sae2Δ cells through an Sgs1-Dna2-dependent mechanism. These suppression events do not involve escaping the checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest. Rather, defective Rad53 or Tel1 signaling bypasses Sae2 function at DSBs by decreasing the amount of Rad9 bound at DSBs. As a consequence, reduced Rad9 association to DNA ends relieves inhibition of Sgs1-Dna2 activity, which can then compensate for the lack of Sae2 in DSB resection and DNA damage resistance. We propose that persistent Tel1 and Rad53 checkpoint signaling in cells lacking Sae2 increases the association of Rad9 at DSBs, which in turn inhibits DSB resection by limiting the activity of the Sgs1-Dna2 resection machinery.     

Role of Saccharomyces single-stranded DNA-binding protein RPA in the strand invasion step of double-strand break repair

The single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein replication protein A (RPA) is essential for both DNA replication and recombination. Chromatin immunoprecipitation techniques were used to visualize the kinetics and extent of RPA binding following induction of a double-strand break (DSB) and during its repair by homologous recombination in yeast. RPA assembles at the HO endonuclease-cut MAT locus simultaneously with the appearance of the DSB, and binding spreads away from the DSB as 5′ to 3′ exonuclease activity creates more ssDNA. RPA binding precedes binding of the Rad51 recombination protein. The extent of RPA binding is greater when Rad51 is absent, supporting the idea that Rad51 displaces RPA from ssDNA. RPA plays an important role during RAD51-mediated strand invasion of the MAT ssDNA into the donor sequence HML. The replication-proficient but recombination-defective rfa1-t11 (K45E) mutation in the large subunit of RPA is normal in facilitating Rad51 filament formation on ssDNA, but is unable to achieve synapsis between MAT and HML. Thus, RPA appears to play a role in strand invasion as well as in facilitating Rad51 binding to ssDNA, possibly by stabilizing the displaced ssDNA.     

RAD51-dependent break-induced replication differs in kinetics and checkpoint responses from RAD51-mediated gene conversion

Diploid Saccharomyces cells experiencing a double-strand break (DSB) on one homologous chromosome repair the break by RAD51-mediated gene conversion >98% of the time. However, when extensive homologous sequences are restricted to one side of the DSB, repair can occur by both RAD51-dependent and RAD51-independent break-induced replication (BIR) mechanisms. Here we characterize the kinetics and checkpoint dependence of RAD51-dependent BIR when the DSB is created within a chromosome. Gene conversion products appear within 2 h, and there is little, if any, induction of the DNA damage checkpoint; however, RAD51-dependent BIR occurs with a further delay of 2 to 4 h and cells arrest in response to the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. RAD51-dependent BIR does not require special facilitating sequences that are required for a less efficient RAD51-independent process. RAD51-dependent BIR occurs efficiently in G(2)-arrested cells. Once repair is initiated, the rate of repair replication during BIR is comparable to that of normal DNA replication, as copying of >100 kb is completed less than 30 min after repair DNA synthesis is detected close to the DSB.     

Drosophila PCH2 is required for a pachytene checkpoint that monitors double-strand-break-independent events leading to meiotic crossover formation

During meiosis, programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired to create at least one crossover per chromosome arm. Crossovers mature into chiasmata, which hold and orient the homologous chromosomes on the meiotic spindle to ensure proper segregation at meiosis I. This process is usually monitored by one or more checkpoints that ensure that DSBs are repaired prior to the meiotic divisions. We show here that mutations in Drosophila genes required to process DSBs into crossovers delay two important steps in meiotic progression: a chromatin-remodeling process associated with DSB formation and the final steps of oocyte selection. Consistent with the hypothesis that a checkpoint has been activated, the delays in meiotic progression are suppressed by a mutation in the Drosophila homolog of pch2. The PCH2-dependent delays also require proteins thought to regulate the number and distribution of crossovers, suggesting that this checkpoint monitors events leading to crossover formation. Surprisingly, two lines of evidence suggest that the PCH2-dependent checkpoint does not reflect the accumulation of unprocessed recombination intermediates: the delays in meiotic progression do not depend on DSB formation or on mei-41, the Drosophila ATR homolog, which is required for the checkpoint response to unrepaired DSBs. We propose that the sites and/or conditions required to promote crossovers are established independently of DSB formation early in meiotic prophase. Furthermore, the PCH2-dependent checkpoint is activated by these events and pachytene progression is delayed until the DSB repair complexes required to generate crossovers are assembled. Interestingly, PCH2-dependent delays in prophase may allow additional crossovers to form.     

Nej1 interacts with Sae2 at DNA double-stranded breaks to inhibit DNA resection

The two major pathways of DNA double-strand break repair, nonhomologous end-joining and homologous recombination, are highly conserved from yeast to mammals. The regulation of 5′-DNA resection controls repair pathway choice and influences repair outcomes. Nej1 was first identified as a canonical NHEJ factor involved in stimulating the ligation of broken DNA ends, and more recently, it was shown to participate in DNA end-bridging and in the inhibition of 5′-resection mediated by the nuclease/helicase complex Dna2–Sgs1. Here, we show that Nej1 interacts with Sae2 to impact DSB repair in three ways. First, we show that Nej1 inhibits interaction of Sae2 with the Mre11–Rad50–Xrs2 complex and Sae2 localization to DSBs. Second, we found that Nej1 inhibits Sae2-dependent recruitment of Dna2 independently of Sgs1. Third, we determined that NEJ1 and SAE2 showed an epistatic relationship for end-bridging, an event that restrains broken DNA ends and reduces the frequency of genomic deletions from developing at the break site. Finally, we demonstrate that deletion of NEJ1 suppressed the synthetic lethality of sae2Δ sgs1Δ mutants, and that triple mutant viability was dependent on Dna2 nuclease activity. Taken together, these findings provide mechanistic insight to how Nej1 functionality inhibits the initiation of DNA resection, a role that is distinct from its involvement in end-joining repair at DSBs.     

BRCA1 and CtIP Are Both Required to Recruit Dna2 at Double-Strand Breaks in Homologous Recombination

Homologous recombination plays a key role in the repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs), and thereby significantly contributes to cellular tolerance to radiotherapy and some chemotherapy. DSB repair by homologous recombination is initiated by 5’ to 3’ strand resection (DSB resection), with nucleases generating the 3’ single-strand DNA (3’ssDNA) at DSB sites. Genetic studies of Saccharomyces cerevisiae demonstrate a two-step DSB resection, wherein CtIP and Mre11 nucleases carry out short-range DSB resection followed by long-range DSB resection done by Dna2 and Exo1 nucleases. Recent studies indicate that CtIP contributes to DSB resection through its non-catalytic role but not as a nuclease. However, it remains elusive how CtIP contributes to DSB resection. To explore the non-catalytic role, we examined the dynamics of Dna2 by developing an immuno-cytochemical method to detect ionizing-radiation (IR)-induced Dna2-subnuclear-focus formation at DSB sites in chicken DT40 and human cell lines. Ionizing-radiation induced Dna2 foci only in wild-type cells, but not in Dna2 depleted cells, with the number of foci reaching its maximum at 30 minutes and being hardly detectable at 120 minutes after IR. Induced foci were detectable in cells in the G2 phase but not in the G1 phase. These observations suggest that Dna2 foci represent the recruitment of Dna2 to DSB sites for DSB resection. Importantly, the depletion of CtIP inhibited the recruitment of Dna2 to DSB sites in both human cells and chicken DT40 cells. Likewise, a defect in breast cancer 1 (BRCA1), which physically interacts with CtIP and contributes to DSB resection, also inhibited the recruitment of Dna2. Moreover, CtIP physically associates with Dna2, and the association is enhanced by IR. We conclude that BRCA1 and CtIP contribute to DSB resection by recruiting Dna2 to damage sites, thus ensuring the robust DSB resection necessary for efficient homologous recombination.     

Caffeine inhibits gene conversion by displacing Rad51 from ssDNA

Efficient repair of chromosomal double-strand breaks (DSBs) by homologous recombination relies on the formation of a Rad51 recombinase filament that forms on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) created at DSB ends. This filament facilitates the search for a homologous donor sequence and promotes strand invasion. Recently caffeine treatment has been shown to prevent gene targeting in mammalian cells by increasing non-productive Rad51 interactions between the DSB and random regions of the genome. Here we show that caffeine treatment prevents gene conversion in yeast, independently of its inhibition of the Mec1^ATR/Tel1^ATM-dependent DNA damage response or caffeine''s inhibition of 5′ to 3′ resection of DSB ends. Caffeine treatment results in a dosage-dependent eviction of Rad51 from ssDNA. Gene conversion is impaired even at low concentrations of caffeine, where there is no discernible dismantling of the Rad51 filament. Loss of the Rad51 filament integrity is independent of Srs2''s Rad51 filament dismantling activity or Rad51''s ATPase activity and does not depend on non-specific Rad51 binding to undamaged double-stranded DNA. Caffeine treatment had similar effects on irradiated HeLa cells, promoting loss of previously assembled Rad51 foci. We conclude that caffeine treatment can disrupt gene conversion by disrupting Rad51 filaments.     

Structure–activity relationships at a nucleobase-stacking tryptophan required for chemomechanical coupling in the DNA resecting motor-nuclease AdnAB

Mycobacterial AdnAB is a heterodimeric helicase-nuclease that initiates homologous recombination by resecting DNA double-strand breaks. The AdnB subunit hydrolyzes ATP to drive single-nucleotide steps of 3′-to-5′ translocation of AdnAB on the tracking DNA strand via a ratchet-like mechanism. Trp325 in AdnB motif III, which intercalates into the tracking strand and makes a π stack on a nucleobase 5′ of a flipped-out nucleoside, is the putative ratchet pawl without which ATP hydrolysis is mechanically futile. Here, we report that AdnAB mutants wherein Trp325 was replaced with phenylalanine, tyrosine, histidine, leucine, or alanine retained activity in ssDNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis but displayed a gradient of effects on DSB resection. The resection velocities of Phe325 and Tyr325 mutants were 90% and 85% of the wild-type AdnAB velocity. His325 slowed resection rate to 3% of wild-type and Leu325 and Ala325 abolished DNA resection. A cryo-EM structure of the DNA-bound Ala325 mutant revealed that the AdnB motif III peptide was disordered and the erstwhile flipped out tracking strand nucleobase reverted to a continuous base-stacked arrangement with its neighbors. We conclude that π stacking of Trp325 on a DNA nucleobase triggers and stabilizes the flipped-out conformation of the neighboring nucleoside that underlies formation of a ratchet pawl.     

Two separable functions of Ctp1 in the early steps of meiotic DNA double-strand break repair

Meiotic programmed DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair is essential for crossing-over and viable gamete formation and requires removal of Spo11-oligonucleotide complexes from 5′ ends (clipping) and their resection to generate invasive 3′-end single-stranded DNA (resection). Ctp1 (Com1, Sae2, CtIP homolog) acting with the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRN) complex is required in both steps. We isolated multiple S. pombe ctp1 mutants deficient in clipping but proficient in resection during meiosis. Remarkably, all of the mutations clustered in or near the conserved CxxC or RHR motif in the C-terminal portion. The mutants tested, like ctp1Δ, were clipping-deficient by both genetic and physical assays­. But, unlike ctp1Δ, these mutants were recombination-proficient for Rec12 (Spo11 homolog)-independent break-repair and resection-proficient by physical assay. We conclude that the intracellular Ctp1 C-terminal portion is essential for clipping, while the N-terminal portion is sufficient for DSB end-resection. This conclusion agrees with purified human CtIP resection and endonuclease activities being independent. Our mutants provide intracellular evidence for separable functions of Ctp1. Some mutations truncate Ctp1 in the same region as one of the CtIP mutations linked to the Seckel and Jawad severe developmental syndromes, suggesting that these syndromes are caused by a lack of clipping at DSB ends that require repair.     

Ctp1-dependent clipping and resection of DNA double-strand breaks by Mre11 endonuclease complex are not genetically separable

Homologous recombination (HR) repair of programmed meiotic double-strand breaks (DSBs) requires endonucleolytic clipping of Rec12^Spo11-oligonucleotides from 5′ DNA ends followed by resection to generate invasive 3′ single-stranded DNA tails. The Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRN) endonuclease and Ctp1 (CtIP and Sae2 ortholog) are required for both activities in fission yeast but whether they are genetically separable is controversial. Here, we investigate the mitotic DSB repair properties of Ctp1 C-terminal domain (ctp1-CD) mutants that were reported to be specifically clipping deficient. These mutants are sensitive to many clastogens, including those that create DSBs devoid of covalently bound proteins. These sensitivities are suppressed by genetically eliminating Ku nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) protein, indicating that Ctp1-dependent clipping by MRN is required for Ku removal from DNA ends. However, this rescue requires Exo1 resection activity, implying that Ctp1-dependent resection by MRN is defective in ctp1-CD mutants. The ctp1-CD mutants tolerate one but not multiple broken replication forks, and they are highly reliant on the Chk1-mediated cell cycle checkpoint arrest, indicating that HR repair is inefficient. We conclude that the C-terminal domain of Ctp1 is required for both efficient clipping and resection of DSBs by MRN and these activities are mechanistically similar.     

Developing Single-Molecule TPM Experiments for Direct Observation of Successful RecA-Mediated Strand Exchange Reaction

RecA recombinases play a central role in homologous recombination. Once assembled on single-stranded (ss) DNA, RecA nucleoprotein filaments mediate the pairing of homologous DNA sequences and strand exchange processes. We have designed two experiments based on tethered particle motion (TPM) to investigate the fates of the invading and the outgoing strands during E. coli RecA-mediated pairing and strand exchange at the single-molecule level in the absence of force. TPM experiments measure the tethered bead Brownian motion indicative of the DNA tether length change resulting from RecA binding and dissociation. Experiments with beads labeled on either the invading strand or the outgoing strand showed that DNA pairing and strand exchange occurs successfully in the presence of either ATP or its non-hydrolyzable analog, ATPγS. The strand exchange rates and efficiencies are similar under both ATP and ATPγS conditions. In addition, the Brownian motion time-courses suggest that the strand exchange process progresses uni-directionally in the 5′-to-3′ fashion, using a synapse segment with a wide and continuous size distribution.