Susceptibility of Clostridium Sporogenes Spores to Selected Reference Substances and Disinfectants

Research on the susceptibility of the spores of anaerobic bacteria such as Clostridium sporogenes or Clostridioides difficile is vital for assessing the sporicidal activity of disinfectants. The diverse susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria spores may lead to different disinfection parameters being determined by laboratories that prepare spore suspensions to test sporicidal effectiveness. The tests were performed using the suspension method according to PN-EN 13704:2018-09. In order to assess the susceptibility of the C. sporogenes spores, the criterion established for the C. difficile ribotype 027 spores was used in accordance with PN‑EN 17126:2019-01. The susceptibility of the C. sporogenes spores to glutardialdehyde corresponded to the susceptibility ranges established for the C. difficile ribotype 027 spores. The C. sporogenes spore suspension was susceptible to low concentrations of peracetic acid (0.01%). A disinfectant containing peracetic acid as the active substance showed high sporicidal activity at a low concentration (1%), a short contact time (15 minutes), and a high organic load (3.0 g/l bovine albumin + 3.0 ml/l sheep erythrocytes), as compared to a disinfectant with glutardialdehyde, which was sporicidal at a higher concentration (2.5%), at a longer contact time(60 minutes) and lower organic conditions (3.0 g/l bovine albumin). There is a need to define the minimum susceptibility criteria for the C. sporogenes spores to the reference substances most often found in disinfectants with sporicidal activity. Excessive susceptibility of the C. sporogenes spores to reference substances may result in low-performance parameters of disinfection products with sporicidal activity and lead to ineffective disinfection in practice. Open in a separate window     

Assessment of the efficacy of disinfectants on surfaces

The Literature on testing the efficacy of disinfectants covers a century. Most predominant and standardized are the so called suspension tests that allow for the quantitative estimation of the microbicidal activity (log reduction factors) of disinfectants on test organisms suspended in solutions of these products.Since the outcome of suspension tests might be a poor predictor for the efficacy of a disinfectant under practical circumstances, especially with regard to bacteria attached to surfaces, a variety of test procedures have been designed to mimic those conditions. Within the framework of CEN/TC 216 a quantitative surface test has been developed to assess the activity of disinfectants on bacteria or fungi attached to steenless steel surfaces. Preliminary data suggest that covering a dried inoculum with disinfectant without any further mechanical action to improve contact between organisms and disinfectant, will usually result in lower reduction factors than those obtained with suspension tests. Comparative testing further suggests that by applying mechanical action, with the effect of resuspending cells in the liquid on the surface,—similar to mopping, brushing etc.— will result in higher reduction rates. Although not unexpected these findings emphasize the importance of designing test methods based on practical applications of disinfectants.     

Modified quantitative association of official analytical chemists sporicidal test for liquid chemical germicides

The Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) test for sporicidal activity of disinfectants (966.04) is used in the United States as the legal criteria for classifying a liquid as a chemical sterilant and also as the indicator of the highest level of disinfectant. This qualitative test contains procedures that may cause inaccurate results. A modified, quantitative version of the AOAC sporicidal test has been developed that uses a specified minimum number of spores (2.0 x 10(sup5)) of Bacillus subtilis or Clostridium sporogenes dried onto porcelain penicylinders. This modified test was validated with three commercial sterilant chemicals tested on three separate groups of spore-labeled cylinders.     

Progress report on CEN/TC 216/Working Group 3: Disinfectant test methods for food hygiene, institutional, industrial and domestic applications

The scope of Working Group 3 (WG3) is very wide both in terms of the areas it covers and the range of disinfectant applications. The major role of disinfectants within this field, however, is the control of the microbial contamination of surfaces that could be used to produce products to be eaten or used by people (cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, foodstuffs etc.). For these applications, disinfectants need to be tested to quantify the effects of microbial type and growth conditions, interfering substances, pH, temperature, contact time and concentration. To address these needs, WG3 has produced a Phase 2 Step 1 Bactericidal (prEN 1276) and Fungicidal (prEN 1650) test, which are at the stage of public comment, and are intended to cover the majority of disinfection applications in its remit. More specialist tests are in preparation to cover virucidal and sporicidal applications and will be available by 1997. These are suspension tests and should be applied when the targeted microbial contamination is already in suspension or is brought into suspension by the disinfectant action. In addition, a surface test is being developed on the basis of the protocol published by the Ad-hoc Surface Test Group. This test will be used to assess disinfection efficacy against organisms attached to surfaces, e.g. those remaining on food processing surfaces after a cleaning action. It is hoped that these approaches will provide test methods that will give confidence, to both disinfectant manufacturers and users, of the performance of disinfectant products when used for their intended purpose.     

Identification by Quantitative Carrier Test of Surrogate Spore-Forming Bacteria To Assess Sporicidal Chemicals for Use against Bacillus anthracis

The spores of six strains of Bacillus anthracis (four virulent and two avirulent) were compared with those of four other types of spore-forming bacteria for their resistance to four liquid chemical sporicides (sodium hypochlorite at 5,000 ppm available chlorine, 70,000 ppm accelerated H₂O₂, 1,000 ppm chlorine dioxide, and 3,000 ppm peracetic acid). All test bacteria were grown in a 1:10 dilution of Columbia broth (with manganese) incubated at 37°C for 72 h. The spore suspensions, heat treated at 80°C for 10 min to rid them of any viable vegetative cells, contained 1 × 10⁸ to 3 × 10⁸ CFU/ml. The second tier of the quantitative carrier test (QCT-2), a standard of ASTM International, was used to assess for sporicidal activity, with disks (1 cm in diameter) of brushed and magnetized stainless steel as spore carriers. Each carrier, with 10 μl (≥10⁶ CFU) of the test spore suspension in a soil load, was dried and then overlaid with 50 μl of the sporicide being evaluated. The contact time at room temperature ranged from 5 to 20 min, and the arbitrarily set criterion for acceptable sporicidal activity was a reduction of ≥10⁶ in viable spore count. Each test was repeated at least three times. In the final analysis, the spores of Bacillus licheniformis (ATCC 14580^T) and Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6051^T) proved to be generally more resistant than the spores of the strains of B. anthracis tested. The use of one or both of the safe and easy-to-handle surrogates identified here should help in developing safer and more-effective sporicides and also in evaluating the field effectiveness of existing and newer formulations in the decontamination of objects and surfaces suspected of B. anthracis contamination.     

Efficacy of a variety of disinfectants against Listeria spp.

The efficacy of 14 disinfectants against Listeria innocua and two strains of Listeria monocytogenes in the presence of organic matter was studied. Quantitative efficacy tests were used. Many of the disinfectants tested were not as effective on Listeria spp. when the test organisms were dried onto the surface of steel disks (carrier tests) as they were when the organisms were placed in suspension (suspension test). The presence of whole serum and milk (2% fat) further reduced the disinfectant capacities of most of the formulations studied. Only three disinfectants (povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine gluconate, and glutaraldehyde) were effective in the carrier test in the presence of serum; however, all three were ineffective when challenged with milk (2% fat). Only one solution, sodium dichloroisocyanurate, was effective in the presence of milk. All but four formulations (chloramine-T, phosphoric acid, an iodophor, and formaldehyde) were effective in the suspension tests, regardless of the organic load. L. monocytogenes was observed to be slightly more resistant to disinfection than L. innocua was. There was no difference in disinfectant susceptibility between the two strains of L. monocytogenes. These findings emphasize the need for caution in selecting an appropriate disinfectant for use on contaminated surfaces, particularly in the presence of organic material.     

四溴甘脲对枯草杆菌黑色变种芽胞损伤作用的电镜观察

为探索四溴甘脲消毒剂杀灭细菌的机理,采用透射电镜技术对四溴甘脲消毒剂处理过的枯草杆菌黑色变种芽胞的超微结构进行了分析和比较.结果显示,以含有效溴274mg/L的四溴甘脲消毒剂作用30min,可使枯草杆菌黑色变种芽胞杀灭率达到100%.在透射电镜下观察到,经该消毒剂作用的枯草杆菌黑色变种芽胞壳质破损断裂明显,壳内结构模糊,核心溶解,有的芽胞近似空壳.结果显示,四溴甘脲消毒剂杀灭芽胞效果优于普通含氯消毒剂,对细菌芽胞超微结构破坏明显.     

Efficacy of a variety of disinfectants against Listeria spp

The efficacy of 14 disinfectants against Listeria innocua and two strains of Listeria monocytogenes in the presence of organic matter was studied. Quantitative efficacy tests were used. Many of the disinfectants tested were not as effective on Listeria spp. when the test organisms were dried onto the surface of steel disks (carrier tests) as they were when the organisms were placed in suspension (suspension test). The presence of whole serum and milk (2% fat) further reduced the disinfectant capacities of most of the formulations studied. Only three disinfectants (povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine gluconate, and glutaraldehyde) were effective in the carrier test in the presence of serum; however, all three were ineffective when challenged with milk (2% fat). Only one solution, sodium dichloroisocyanurate, was effective in the presence of milk. All but four formulations (chloramine-T, phosphoric acid, an iodophor, and formaldehyde) were effective in the suspension tests, regardless of the organic load. L. monocytogenes was observed to be slightly more resistant to disinfection than L. innocua was. There was no difference in disinfectant susceptibility between the two strains of L. monocytogenes. These findings emphasize the need for caution in selecting an appropriate disinfectant for use on contaminated surfaces, particularly in the presence of organic material.     

Development of a Standard Test To Assess the Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Cells to Disinfectants

A standardized disinfectant test for Staphylococcus aureus cells in biofilms was developed. Two disinfectants, the membrane-active compound benzalkonium chloride (BAC) and the oxidizing agent sodium hypochlorite, were used to evaluate the biofilm test. S. aureus formed biofilms on glass, stainless steel, and polystyrene in a simple system with constant nutrient flow that mimicked as closely as possible the conditions used in the current standard European disinfectant test (EN 1040). The biofilm that was formed on glass contained cell clumps and extracellular polysaccharides. The average surface coverage was 60%, and most (92%) of the biofilm cells were viable. Biofilm formation and biofilm disinfection in different experiments were reproducible. For biofilms exposed to BAC and hypochlorite the concentrations needed to achieve 4-log killing were 50 and 600 times higher, respectively, than the concentrations needed to achieve this level of killing with the European phase 1 suspension test cells. Our results show that a standardized disinfectant test for biofilm cells is a useful addition to the current standard tests.     

Comparative testing of disinfectants using proposed European surface test methods

A surface test method for disinfectants currently under development as a standard European test method is described. The test involves determining the number of viable organisms recoverable from a contaminated stainless steel surface before and after application of disinfectant. Evaluation of a range of disinfectant agents and products currently used in the UK indicated that products at recommended use concentrations produced log reductions in viable count ranging from < 1.0 to > 6.4 (i.e. no detectable survivors) after a 5 min contact period against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecium and Candida albicans. Increased activity was observed by increasing the disinfectant contact time to 30 min. Addition of 3% w/v albumin to the test suspension used to inoculate surfaces caused a substantial reduction in activity.     

Development of a standard test to assess the resistance of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm cells to disinfectants

A standardized disinfectant test for Staphylococcus aureus cells in biofilms was developed. Two disinfectants, the membrane-active compound benzalkonium chloride (BAC) and the oxidizing agent sodium hypochlorite, were used to evaluate the biofilm test. S. aureus formed biofilms on glass, stainless steel, and polystyrene in a simple system with constant nutrient flow that mimicked as closely as possible the conditions used in the current standard European disinfectant test (EN 1040). The biofilm that was formed on glass contained cell clumps and extracellular polysaccharides. The average surface coverage was 60%, and most (92%) of the biofilm cells were viable. Biofilm formation and biofilm disinfection in different experiments were reproducible. For biofilms exposed to BAC and hypochlorite the concentrations needed to achieve 4-log killing were 50 and 600 times higher, respectively, than the concentrations needed to achieve this level of killing with the European phase 1 suspension test cells. Our results show that a standardized disinfectant test for biofilm cells is a useful addition to the current standard tests.     

Sporicidal Properties of Some Halogens

S ummary . Sodium hypochlorite, sodium dichloro iso cyanurate, dichlorodimethyl hydantoin, dibromodimethyl hydantoin and an iodophor have been examined for disinfectant activity against spores of Bacillus cereus. Under the test conditions used sodium hypochlorite was the most effective compound and dibromodimethyl hydantoin was least affected by increase in pH from 6.5 to 8; the activity of the iodophor was unaffected in the pH range 2.3–6.5. Bacillus subtilis spores were much more resistant to the disinfectants than were B. cereus spores. The addition of KBr to solutions of sodium dichloro iso yanurate enhanced its activity at pH 9 but not at pH 7 or 8.
Mixtures of 1.5–4% of NaOH with NaOCl (200 p of available chlorine/m) were much more rapidly sporicidal than either NaOH or NaOCl (pH 9 and above) alone.     

Disinfection in Food Processing – Efficacy Testing of Disinfectants

The key to effective cleaning and disinfection of food plants is the understanding of the type of the soil to be removed from the surfaces. An efficient cleaning and disinfection procedure consists of a sequence of rinses using good quality water with application of detergents and disinfectants. Disinfection is required in food plant operations, where wet surfaces provide favourable conditions for the growth of microbes. The efficacy of disinfectants is usually determined in suspensions, which do not mimic the growth conditions on surfaces where the agents are required to inactivate the microbes. Therefore, the suspension tests do not give adequate information and reliable carrier tests, which mimic surface growth, are needed. In developing a proposal for the testing of disinfectants on surfaces to an analytical standard, it is important to identify the major sources of variation in the procedure. In response to the need for a relatively realistic, simple and reliable test for disinfectant efficacy a method for culturing laboratory model biofilms has developed. The use of artificial biofilms i.e. biofilm-constructs inoculated with process contaminants in disinfectant testing can also be used for screening the activity of various disinfectants on biofilm cells. Both biofilm carrier tests showed clearly that the biofilm protects the microbes against the disinfectants. The chemical cleanliness is also essential in food plants. The total cleanliness of the process lines is mainly based on measuring the microbial load using culturing techniques. These results can give an incorrect picture of the total cleanliness, because the viable microbes do not grow when disinfectants are left on the surface. The luminescent bacteria light inhibition method offers a useful alternative for testing chemical residue left on surfaces after cleaning and disinfection operations.     

Gamma radiation resistance of Bacillus anthracis spores

The aim of the presented study was determined the effectiveness of action the gamma radiation on water suspension B. anthracis spores. The irradiation was performed using a Cobalt 60 (Co 60) source, by using single and fractionary irradiation doses. In the investigations was used B. anthracis stain "Sterne" 34F2. The obtained results show, that gamma radiation effectively inactivates B. anthracis spores. On the efficiency of sterilization process influence the irradiation's method and the number of spores in 1 ml suspension. In the suspension 1.5 x 10(9) spore in 1 ml, sporicidal doses gamma radiation amount to 25.0 kGy (single dose) or 41.5 kGy (fractionary dose). The volume suspension about definite inoculum of spores, subjected working the gamma rays has not influence on sporicidal effectiveness of radiation sterilization.     

Bacterial spore structures and their protective role in biocide resistance

The structure and chemical composition of bacterial spores differ considerably from those of vegetative cells. These differences largely account for the unique resistance properties of the spore to environmental stresses, including disinfectants and sterilants, resulting in the emergence of spore-forming bacteria such as Clostridium difficile as major hospital pathogens. Although there has been considerable work investigating the mechanisms of action of many sporicidal biocides against Bacillus subtilis spores, there is far less information available for other species and particularly for various Clostridia. This paucity of information represents a major gap in our knowledge given the importance of Clostridia as human pathogens. This review considers the main spore structures, highlighting their relevance to spore resistance properties and detailing their chemical composition, with a particular emphasis on the differences between various spore formers. Such information will be vital for the rational design and development of novel sporicidal chemistries with enhanced activity in the future.     

PCR detection of potentially pathogenic aeromonads in raw and cold-smoked freshwater fish

AIMS: To determine the mechanism of killing of spores of Bacillus subtilis by ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA), an aromatic dialdehyde currently in use as an antimicrobial agent. METHODS AND RESULTS: OPA is sporicidal, although spores are much more OPA resistant than are vegetative cells. Bacillus subtilis mutants deficient in DNA repair, spore DNA protection and spore coat assembly have been used to show that (i) the coat appears to be a major component of spore OPA resistance, which is acquired late in sporulation of B. subtilis at the time of spore coat maturation, and (ii) B. subtilis spores are not killed by OPA through DNA damage but by elimination of spore germination. Furthermore, OPA-treated spores that cannot germinate are not recovered by artificial germinants or by treatment with NaOH or lysozyme. CONCLUSIONS: OPA appears to kill spores by blocking the spore germination process. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This work provides information on the mechanism of spore resistance to, and spore killing by, the disinfectant, OPA.     

Efficacy of some commerical disinfectants against the bacterial isolates from a poultry slaughterhouse in Turkey

In this study, efficacy of seven different commercial disinfectant preparations was investigated against characteristic bacteria of a poultry slaughterhouse in Ankara (Turkey) by using paper disc-agar diffusion method and surface effectiveness test. According to paper disc-agar diffusion method, some disinfectants had wide efficacy against the test bacteria. The disinfectant effectiveness generally increased by the increasing of disinfectant concentration. However, some disinfectants were ineffective even though at their highest concentrations. The most effective disinfectant was B which contains QAC as active agent.Staphylococcus spp.,Staphyloccus aureus andEscherichia coli were the most sensitive bacteria to the disinfectants. Some pathogenic isolates, especiallySalmonella spp. andCampylobacter spp., were the most resistant ones to many of the disinfectants tested. The results of paper disc-agar diffusion method indicated the importance of characteristic bacterial strains of food plants as the test bacteria for disinfectant efficacy tests. Conversely of paper disc-agar diffusion method, all disinfectants were effective against the isolates by surface effectiveness test depending on exposure time. The disinfectants, except A and F, produced at least 3 log unit reduction during 5 min of exposure. However, all disinfectants at their lowest concentrations were effective against all tested bacteria during 15 and 30 min by this test.     

The testing of disinfectants

Although all disinfectant tests have the same final purpose, namely measuring the antimicrobial activity of a chemical substance or preparation, a large number of testing methods has been described. They are subdivided into suspension tests, carrier and surface disinfection tests and other practice-mimicking tests. The suspension tests comprise qualitative and quantitative suspension tests, and, as derived tests, the determination of the phenol coefficient and capacity tests. There is an essential difference between a carrier test and a surface disinfectant test: in the former case the carrier is submerged in the disinfectant solution during the whole exposure time, whereas in the latter case the disinfectant is applied on the carrier for the application time and thereafter the carrier is drying during the exposure.The basic principle now widely accepted is that the antimicrobial efficiency of a disinfectant is examined at three stages of testing.The first stage concerns laboratory tests in which it is verified whether a chemical compound or a preparation possesses antimicrobial activity. For these preliminary screening tests, suspension tests are considered.In the second stage of tests, disinfection procedures and not disinfectants are examined. It is determined under which conditions and at which use-dilution for a given application the preparation is active: the tests simulate real-life situations; such tests are carrier tests for the disinfection of materials by submersion and surface disinfection tests.The last stage takes place in the field, and comprises the in-loco or in-situ tests with as variants the in-use tests, which examine whether, after a normal period of use, germs are still killed by the disinfectant solution.It is the task of the European and international standardization organisations to develop new standards and to elaborate tests, which predict the effectiveness of a preparation in practice under variable circumstances.     

Mechanism of Sporicidal Activity for the Synergistic Combination of Peracetic Acid and Hydrogen Peroxide

There is still great interest in controlling bacterial endospores. The use of chemical disinfectants and, notably, oxidizing agents to sterilize medical devices is increasing. With this in mind, hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) and peracetic acid (PAA) have been used in combination, but until now there has been no explanation for the observed increase in sporicidal activity. This study provides information on the mechanism of synergistic interaction of PAA and H₂O₂ against bacterial spores. We performed investigations of the efficacies of different combinations, including pretreatments with the two oxidizers, against wild-type spores and a range of spore mutants deficient in the spore coat or small acid-soluble spore proteins. The concentrations of the two biocides were also measured in the reaction vessels, enabling the assessment of any shift from H₂O₂ to PAA formation. This study confirmed the synergistic activity of the combination of H₂O₂ and PAA. However, we observed that the sporicidal activity of the combination is largely due to PAA and not H₂O₂. Furthermore, we observed that the synergistic combination was based on H₂O₂ compromising the spore coat, which was the main spore resistance factor, likely allowing better penetration of PAA and resulting in the increased sporicidal activity.     

The effect of disinfectants on a geosmin-producing strain of Streptomyces griseus.

This study describes the bactericidal and sporicidal effects of four disinfectants on a geosmin-producing strain of Streptomyces griseus. The disinfectants investigated were chlorine, chloramine, chlorine dioxide and ozone. Chlorine and chlorine dioxide at concentrations around 1 mg/l were effective inactivators of both spore and mycelial propagules. Decimation times of less than 1 min were determined in each case. Both growth forms exhibited a high ozone demand, but decimation times resulting from an initial dose of around 2.5 mg/l were approximately 1.5 min. Monochloramine was comparatively less effective: at a concentration of approximately 1 mg/l the decimation times for spores and mycelia were 13.8 and 22.7 min, respectively.