Neural induction in embryos

Neural differentiation of the ectoderm is inhibited by bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP-4) in amphibia as well as mammalia. This inhibition is released by neural inducing factor(s), which are secreted from the dorsal mesoderm. Masked neuralizing factor(s) are already present in the ectoderm before induction. In homogenates from Xenopus oocytes and embryos neural inducing factors were found in the supernatant (centrifuged at 105 000 g ), in small vesicles and a ribonucleoprotein fraction. A neuralizing factor, which is a protein of small size, has been partially purified from Xenopus gastrulae. Genes that are expressed in the dorsal mesoderm and involved in the de novo synthesis of neuralizing factor(s) have been cloned. The differentiation of cells with a neuronal fate starts in the neural plate immediately after neural induction. Genes homologous to the Notch and Delta genes of lateral inhibition in insects are involved in this process.     

Vertical versus planar induction in amphibian early development

In the Urodeles, the archenteron roof invaginates as a single continuous sheet of cells, vertically inducing the neural anlage in the overlying ectoderm during invagination. The induction comprises first the activation process, leading, to forebrain differentiation tendencies, and then the superimposed transformation process, which changes presumptive forebrain development into that of hindbrain and spinal cord acting with a caudally increasing intensity. The activating action, being maximal anteriorly, decreases caudally to nearly zero. In the double-layered Xenopus embryo, the internal mesodermal marginal zone shows much more independent and earlier regional segregation and involution than the external marginal zone in the Urodeles; its prechordal mesoderm already initiating vertical neural induction in overlying ectoderm at stages 10 to 10⁺ before any visible archenteron invagination. In Xenopus incomplete exogastrulae the prechordal mesoderm involutes normally prior to evagination of the endoderm and mesodem. Artificially produced Xenopus total exogastrulae, made at stage 9 before mesoderm involution, behave just like axolotl total exogastrulae, showing no neural differentiation. The notion of planar neural induction in Xenopus can only be applied in exogastrulae and Keller explants for the transforming action, which is maximal in the caudal archenteron roof. In normal Xenopus development, the formation of the entire nervous system is essentially due to vertical induction by the successively involuting prechordal and notochordal mesoderm. The different behavior of Xenopus embryos in comparison with Urodele embryos can essentially be explained by the double-layered character of the animal moiety of the Xenopus embryo.     

Blastopore formation and dorsal mesoderm induction are independent events in early Cynops embryogenesis

The independent roles of blastopore formation and dorsal mesoderm induction in dorsal axis formation of the Cynops pyrrhogaster embryo were attempted to be clarified. The blastopore-forming (bottle) cells originated mainly from the progeny of the mid-dorsal C and/or D blastomeres of the 32-cell embryo, but were not defined to a fixed blastomere. It was confirmed that the isolated dorsal C and D blastomeres autonomously formed a blastopore. Ultraviolet-irradiated eggs formed an abnormal blastopore and then did not form a dorsal axis, although the lower dorsal marginal zone (LDMZ) still had dorsal mesoderm-inducing activity. Involution of the dorsal marginal zone was disturbed by the abnormal blastopore. These embryos were rescued by artificially facilitating involution of the dorsal marginal zone. Suramin-injected and nocodazole-treated blastulae did not have involution of the dorsal marginal zone, although the blastopore was formed. Neither embryos formed the dorsal axis. The dorsal mesoderm-inducing activity of the LDMZ in the nocodazole-treated gastrulae was still active. In contrast, the LDMZ of the suramin-injected embryos lost its dorsal mesoderm-inducing activity. bra expression was activated in the nocodazole-treated embryos but not in the suramin-injected embryos. The present study suggested that (i) the dorsal determinants consist of blastopore-forming and dorsal mesoderm-inducing factors, which are not always mutually dependent; (ii) both factors are activated during the late blastula stage; (iii) the dorsal marginal zone cannot specify to an organized notochord and muscle without the involution that blastopore formation leads to; and (iv) the localization of both factors in the same place is prerequisite for dorsal axis formation.     

Bone morphogenetic protein acts as a ventral mesoderm modifier in early Xenopus embryos

Mesoderm of early vertebrate embryos gradually acquires dorsal–ventral polarity during embryogenesis. This specification of mesoderm is thought to be regulated by several polypeptide growth factors. Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), a member of the TGF-β family, is one of the regulators suggested to be involved in the formation of ventral mesoderm. In this paper, the nature of the endogenous BMP signal in dorsal–ventral specification was assessed in early Xenopus embryos using a dominant negative mutant of the Xenopus BMP receptor. In ectodermal explant assays, disruption of endogenous BMP signaling by the mutant receptor changed the competence of the explant cells to mesoderm-inducing factors, activin and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and led to formation of neural tissue without mesoderm induction. This result suggests that endogenous BMP acts as a ventral mesoderm modifier rather than a ventral mesoderm inducer, and that interactions between endogenous BMP and mesoderm-inducing factors may be important in dorsal–ventral patterning of embryonic mesoderm. In addition, the induction of neural tissue by inhibition of the BMP signaling pathway also suggests involvement of BMP in neural induction.     

Noise transmission during the dynamic pattern formation in fly embryos

Background: Developmental patterning is highly reproducible and accurate at the single-cell level during fly embryogenesis despite the gene expression noise and external perturbations such as the variation of the embryo length, temperature and genes. To reveal the underlying mechanism, it is very important to characterize the noise transmission during the dynamic pattern formation. Two hypotheses have been proposed. The “channel” scenario requires a highly reproducible input and an accurate interpretation by downstream genes. In contrast, the “filter” scenario proposes a noisy input and a noise filter via the cross-regulation of the downstream network. It has been under great debates which scenario the fly embryogenesis follows. Results: The first 3-h developmental patterning of fly embryos is orchestrated by a hierarchical segmentation gene network, which rewires upon the maternal to zygotic transition. Starting from the highly reproducible maternal gradients, the positional information is refined to the single-cell precision through the highly dynamical evolved zygotic gene expression profiles. Thus the fly embryo development might strictly fit into neither the originally proposed “filter” nor “channel” scenario. The controversy that which scenario the fly embryogenesis follows could be further clarified by combining quantitative measurements and modeling. Conclusions: Fly embryos have become one of the perfect model systems for quantitative systems biology studies. The underlying mechanism discovered from fly embryogenesis will deepen our understanding of the noise control of the gene network, facilitate searching for more efficient and safer methods for cell programming and reprogramming, and have the great potential for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.     

Calcium signalling during neural induction in Xenopus laevis embryos

In Xenopus, experiments performed with isolated ectoderm suggest that neural determination is a 'by default' mechanism, which occurs when bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are antagonized by extracellular antagonists, BMP being responsible for the determination of epidermis. However, Ca(2+) imaging of intact Xenopus embryos reveals patterns of Ca(2+) transients which are generated via the activation of dihydropyridine-sensitive Ca(2+) channels in the dorsal ectoderm but not in the ventral ectoderm. These increases in the concentration of intracellular Ca(2+)([Ca(2+)]i) appear to be necessary and sufficient to orient the ectodermal cells towards a neural fate as increasing the [Ca(2+)]i artificially results in neuralization of the ectoderm. We constructed a subtractive cDNA library between untreated and caffeine-treated ectoderms (to increase [Ca(2+)]i) and then identified early Ca(2+)-sensitive target genes expressed in the neural territories. One of these genes, an arginine methyltransferase, controls the expression of the early proneural gene, Zic3. Here, we discuss the evidence for the existence of an alternative model to the 'by default' mechanism, where Ca(2+) plays a central regulatory role in the expression of Zic3, an early proneural gene, and in epidermal determination which only occurs when the Ca(2+)-dependent signalling pathways are inactive.     

Mesodermal induction in early amphibian embryos by activin A (erythroid differentiation factor)

Summary Recently the mesoderm-inducing effects of the transforming growth factor (TGF-) family of proteins have been widely examined. In an attemt to elucidate the functions of these proteins, porcine inhibin A and activin A (erythroid differentiation factor; EDF) were examined. Treatment of explants with activin A led to differentiation of mesodermal derivatives such as mesenchyme, notochord, blood cells and muscle, but inhibin A had a much lesser effect. The mesodermal differentiation induced by activin A was also comfirmed by analyses using a polyclonal antibody against muscle myosin. By indirect immunofluorescence analysis, the differentiation of muscle blocks was observed in the activin-A-treated explants, whereas no differentiation was observed in inhibin-A-treated and control explants. These findings confirm that this protein of the TGF- family has mesoderm-inducing ability.     

Cell migration, pattern formation and cell fate during head development in lungfishes and amphibians

Summary In the evolution of land-living vertebrates, the transition from spending the entire life cycle in the water to first a biphasic (adult on land, eggs and larvae in water) and later a terrestrial life-history mode was achieved by changes in developmental processes and regulatory mechanisms. Lungfishes, salamanders and frogs are studied as examples of species which span this transition. The migration and fate of the embryonic cells that form the head is studied, using experimental embryology (extirpation and transplantation of cells), molecular markers and novel microscopy techniques — such as confocal microscopy. Knowing the migratory routes and fates of the cells that form head structures is important for an elucidation of the changes that took place e.g. when gill arches transformed into head cartilages, and when the specialised larval mouth structures present in today’s frogs and toads arose as an evolutionary innovation. Results so far indicate that the early migration and pattern formation of neural crest cells in the head region is surprisingly conserved. Both the amphibians investigated and the Australian lungfish have the same number of migrating neural crest streams, and the identity of the streams is preserved. The major difference lies in the timing of migration, where there has been a heterochronic shift such that cell migration starts much later in the Australian lungfish than in the amphibians. The molecular mechanisms regulating the formation of streams of cranial neural crest cells seem, at least in part, to be differential expression of ephrins and ephrin receptors, which mediate cell sorting. Our understanding of the behaviour of migrating cells (primarily the more well characterised neural crest cells) could be enhanced by a modelling approach. I present preliminary ideas on how this could be achieved, inspired by recent work on Dictyostelium development and our own previous work on pigment cells and their pattern formation during salamander embryogenesis.     

Spatio-temporal pattern of MAP kinase activation in embryos of the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi

To understand developmental mechanisms, it is important to know when and where signaling pathways are activated. The spatio-temporal pattern of activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK/ERK) was investigated during embryogenesis of the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi, using an antibody specific to the activated form of MAPK. During cleavage stages, activated MAPK was transiently observed in nuclei of the precursor blastomeres of endoderm, notochord, mesenchyme, brain, secondary muscle, trunk lateral cells and trunk ventral cells. These sites of MAPK activation are consistent with results of previous studies that have analyzed the embryonic induction of various tissues, and with results of inhibition of MAPK kinase (MEK) in ascidians. Activation of MAPK in notochord and mesenchyme blastomeres was observed in a short period in a single cell cycle. In contrast, in brain and secondary muscle lineages, MAPK activation spanned two or three cell cycles, and upon each cleavage, MAPK was asymmetrically activated in only one of the two daughter cells that remained brain or secondary muscle lineages. During later stages, MAPK activation was predominantly observed in the central nervous system. A conspicuous feature at this stage was that activation appeared to alternate between positive and negative along the anterior-posterior axis of the neural tube. During the tail elongation stage, MAPK was quiescent.     

Pattern formation in a pentameral animal: induction of early adult rudiment development in sea urchins

We investigated adult rudiment induction in the direct-developing sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma microsurgically. After removal of the archenteron (which includes presumptive coelomic mesoderm as well as presumptive endoderm) from late gastrulae, larval ectoderm develops properly but obvious rudiments (tube feet, nervous system, and adult skeleton) fail to form, indicating that coelomic mesoderm, endoderm, or both are required for induction of adult development. Recombination of ectoderm and archenteron rescues development. Implanted endoderm alone or left coelom alone each regenerate the full complement of archenteron derivatives; thus, they are uninformative as to the relative inductive potential of the two regions. However, in isolated ectoderm, more limited regeneration gives rise to larvae containing no archenteron derivatives at all, endoderm only, or both endoderm and left coelom. Adult nervous system begins to develop only in the latter, indicating that left coelom is required for the inductive signal. Isolated ectoderm develops a vestibule (the precursor of adult ectoderm) and correctly regulates vestibular expression of the ectodermal territory marker HeET-1, indicating that the early phase of vestibule development occurs autonomously; only later development requires the inductive signal. Another ectodermal marker, HeARS, is regulated properly in the larval ectoderm region, but not in the vestibule. HeARS regulation thus represents an early response to the inducing signal. We compare HeARS expression in H. erythrogramma with that in indirect developers and discuss its implications for modularity in the evolution of developmental mode.     

Planar and vertical induction of anteroposterior pattern during the development of the amphibian central nervous system

In amphibians and other vertebrates, neural development is induced in the ectoderm by signals coming from the dorsal mesoderm during gastrulation. Classical embryological results indicated that these signals follow a “vertical” path, from the involuted dorsal mesoderm to the overlying ectoderm. Recent work with the frog Xenopus laevis, however, has revealed the existence of “planar” neural-inducing signals, which pass within the continuous sheet or plane of tissue formed by the dorsal mesoderm and presumptive neurectoderm. Much of this work has made use of Keller explants, in which dorsal mesoderm and ectoderm are cultured in a planar configuration with contact along only a single edge, and vertical contact is prevented. Planar signals can induce the full anteroposterior (A-P) extent of neural pattern, as evidenced in Keller explants by the expression of genes that mark specific positions along the A-P axis. In this review, classical and modern molecular work on vertical and planar inductionwill be discussed. This will be followed by a discussion of various models for vertical induction and planar induction. It has been proposed that the A-P pattern in the nervous system is derived from a parallel pattern of inducers in the dorsal mesoderm which is “imprinted” vertically onto the overlying ectoderm. Since it is now known that planar signals can also induce A-P neural pattern, this kind of model must be reassessed. The study of planar induction of A-P pattern in Xenopus embryos provides a simple, manipulable, two-dimensional system in which to investigate pattern formation. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Position dependent expression of GL2-type homeobox gene, Roc1: significance for protoderm differentiation and radial pattern formation in early rice embryogenesis

In early plant embryogenesis, the determination of cell fate in the protodermal cell layer is considered to be the earliest event in radial pattern formation. To elucidate the mechanisms of epidermal cell fate determination and radial pattern formation in early rice embryogenesis, we have isolated a GL2-type homeobox gene Roc1 (Rice outermost cell-specific gene1), which is specifically expressed in the protoderm (epidermis). In early rice embryogenesis, cell division occurs randomly and the morphologically distinct layer structure of the protoderm cannot be observed until the embryo reaches more than 100 microm in length. Nonetheless, in situ hybridization analyses revealed that specific expression of Roc1 in the outermost cells is established shortly after fertilization, much earlier than protoderm differentiation. In the regeneration process from callus, the Roc1 gene is also expressed in the outermost cells of callus in advance of tissue and organ differentiation, and occurs independently of whether the cells will differentiate into epidermis in the future or not. Furthermore, this cell-specific Roc1 expression could be induced flexibly in the newly produced outermost cells when we cut the callus. These findings suggest that the expression of Roc1 in the outermost cells may be dependent on the positional information of cells in the embryo or callus prior to the cell fate determination of the protoderm (epidermis). Furthermore, the Roc1 expression is downregulated in the inner cells of ligule, which have previously been determined as protodermal cells, also suggesting that the Roc1 expression is position dependent and that this position dependent Roc1 expression is important also in post-embryonic protoderm (epidermis) differentiation.     

Mesoderm induction in amphibians and chick

Induction is a process in which the developmental pathway of one cell is controlled by signals emitted from another. Mesoderm induction is the first inductive interaction in theXenopus enbryo and probably occurs in all vertebrates. It is a very important event as it is implicated in the regulation of morphogenesis. Nieuwkoop first demonstrated the importance of vegetal endoderm in inducing the mesoderm. Slack and co-workers incorporated the information obtained from experimental embryology in a “three signal” model for mesoderm induction in amphibians (signals arising from ventral vegetal hemisphere, dorsal vegetal hemisphere and the organizer). More recent research has resulted in the detection of mesoderm inducing factors which are members of FGF and TGF--β families. Activin, a member of the TGF-β family, has been shown to induce differential gene expression and cell differentiation in a concentration-dependent manner giving credence to the theory of morphogen gradients. Study of mesoderm induction in the chick embryo is much more difficult due to several reasons. Novel experimental approaches, however, have been used which point to the role of activin and FGF in chick mesoderm induction. The demonstration of mesoderm inducing activity of activin and FGF in other groups of vertebrates, particularly the chick embryo brings out the possibility of a universal mechanism of mesoderm induction being operative in all the vertebrates.     

Neural induction: New achievements and prospects

Neural induction is a triggering of neural differentiation in a portion of cells of the vertebrate embryonic ectoderm in response to signals emanating from adjacent tissues. As revealed more than ten years ago in experiments with Xenopus embryos, the major role in neural induction is played by suppression of the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling cascade in neural cell precursors. Consequently, the epidermal differentiation program is blocked and a neural program is activated in such cells by default. The so-called default model of neural induction was supported with other experimental subjects. An important role in neural induction is also played by the FGF and Wnt signaling cascades via their interactions with the BMP cascade. As new regulatory proteins involved in neural induction were identified and their properties analyzed in detail, it became possible to apply mathematical modeling to study, with the example of neural induction, the spatial self-organization of cell differentiation in the embryo as one of the main problems of developmental biology.     

Lithium induces changes in the plasma membrane protein pattern of early amphibian embryos

Summary— The plasma membrane protein pattern of Rana ridibunda embryos subjected to lithium (Li) treatment at various stages of development was examined by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Differences were observed at the neurula stage not only as compared to controls but among lithium-treated embryos as well. Of particular interest was the presence of proteins, specific for the gastrula stage, in lithium-treated embryos. The results are discussed in relation to the well-known effect of lithium on amphibian morphogenesis.     

An expression pattern screen for genes involved in the induction of the posterior nervous system of zebrafish

The posterior nervous system, including the hindbrain and the spinal cord, has been shown to be formed by the transformation of neural plate of anterior character by signals derived from non-axial mesoderm. Although secreted factors, such as fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), Wnts, retinoic acid (RA) and Nodal, have been proposed to be the posteriorizing factors, the mechanism how neural tissue of posterior character is induced and subsequently specified along the anteroposterior axis remains elusive. To identify intercellular signaling molecules responsible for posteriorization of the neural plate as well as to find molecules induced intracellularly by the posteriorizing signal in the caudal neural plate, we screened by in situ hybridization for genes specifically expressed in posterior tissues, including the posterior neural plate and non-axial mesoderm when posteriorization of the neural plate takes place. From a subtracted library differentiating anterior versus posterior neural plate, 420 cDNA clones were tested, out of which 76 cDNA fragments showed expression restricted to the posterior tissue. These clones turned out to represent 32 different genes, including one novel secreted factor and one transmembrane protein. Seven genes were induced by non-axial mesodermal implants and bFGF beads, suggesting that these are among the early-response genes of the posteriorizing signal. Thus, our approach employing cDNA subtraction and subsequent expression pattern screening allows us to clone candidate genes involved in a novel signaling pathway contributing to the formation of the posterior nervous system.