Potato Leafroll Virus Binds to the Equatorial Domain of the Aphid Endosymbiotic GroEL Homolog

A GroEL homolog with a molecular mass of 60 kDa, produced by the primary endosymbiotic bacterium (a Buchnera sp.) of Myzus persicae and released into the hemolymph, has previously been shown to be a key protein in the transmission of potato leafroll virus (PLRV). Like other luteoviruses and pea enation mosaic virus, PLRV readily binds to extracellular Buchnera GroEL, and in vivo interference in this interaction coincides with reduced capsid integrity and loss of infectivity. To gain more knowledge of the nature of the association between PLRV and Buchnera GroEL, the groE operon of the primary endosymbiont of M. persicae (MpB groE) and its flanking sequences were characterized and the PLRV-binding domain of Buchnera GroEL was identified by deletion mutant analysis. MpB GroEL has extensive sequence similarity (92%) with Escherichia coli GroEL and other members of the chaperonin-60 family. The genomic organization of the Buchnera groE operon is similar to that of the groE operon of E. coli except that a constitutive promoter sequence could not be identified; only the heat shock promoter was present. By a virus overlay assay of protein blots, it was shown that purified PLRV bound as efficiently to recombinant MpB GroEL (expressed in E. coli) as it did to wild-type MpB GroEL. Mutational analysis of the gene encoding MpB GroEL revealed that the PLRV-binding site was located in the so-called equatorial domain and not in the apical domain which is generally involved in polypeptide binding and folding. Buchnera GroEL mutants lacking the entire equatorial domain or parts of it lost the ability to bind PLRV. The equatorial domain is made up of two regions at the N and C termini that are not contiguous in the amino acid sequence but are in spatial proximity after folding of the GroEL polypeptide. Both the N- and C-terminal regions of the equatorial domain were implicated in virus binding.     

A nonconserved carboxy-terminal segment of GroEL contributes to reaction temperature

The role of the C-terminal segment of the GroEL equatorial domain was analyzed. To understand the molecular basis for the different active temperatures of GroEL from three bacteria, we constructed a series of chimeric GroELs combining the C-terminal segment of the equatorial domain from one species with the remainder of GroEL from another. In each case, the foreign C-terminal segment substantially altered the active temperature range of the chimera. Substitution of L524 of Escherichia coli GroEL with the corresponding residue (isoleucine) from psychrophilic GroEL resulted in a GroE with approximately wild-type activity at 25 degrees C, but also at 10 degrees C, a temperature at which wild-type E. coli GroE is inactive. In a detailed look at the temperature dependence of the GroELs, normal E. coli GroEL and the L524I mutant became highly active above 14 degrees C and 12 degrees C respectively. Similar temperature dependences were observed in a surface plasmon resonance assay of GroES binding. These results suggested that the C-terminal segment of the GroEL equatorial domain has an important role in the temperature dependence of GroEL. Moreover, E. coli acquired the ability to grow at low temperature through the introduction of cold-adapted chimeric or L524I mutant groEL genes.     

A Nonconserved Carboxy-Terminal Segment of GroEL Contributes to Reaction Temperature

The role of the C-terminal segment of the GroEL equatorial domain was analyzed. To understand the molecular basis for the different active temperatures of GroEL from three bacteria, we constructed a series of chimeric GroELs combining the C-terminal segment of the equatorial domain from one species with the remainder of GroEL from another. In each case, the foreign C-terminal segment substantially altered the active temperature range of the chimera. Substitution of L524 of Escherichia coli GroEL with the corresponding residue (isoleucine) from psychrophilic GroEL resulted in a GroE with approximately wild-type activity at 25 °C, but also at 10 °C, a temperature at which wild-type E. coli GroE is inactive. In a detailed look at the temperature dependence of the GroELs, normal E. coli GroEL and the L524I mutant became highly active above 14 °C and 12 °C respectively. Similar temperature dependences were observed in a surface plasmon resonance assay of GroES binding. These results suggested that the C-terminal segment of the GroEL equatorial domain has an important role in the temperature dependence of GroEL. Moreover, E. coli acquired the ability to grow at low temperature through the introduction of cold-adapted chimeric or L524I mutant groEL genes.     

Contributions of the N- and C-terminal helical segments to the lipid-free structure and lipid interaction of apolipoprotein A-I

The tertiary structure of lipid-free apolipoprotein (apo) A-I in the monomeric state comprises two domains: a N-terminal alpha-helix bundle and a less organized C-terminal domain. This study examined how the N- and C-terminal segments of apoA-I (residues 1-43 and 223-243), which contain the most hydrophobic regions in the molecule and are located in opposite structural domains, contribute to the lipid-free conformation and lipid interaction. Measurements of circular dichroism in conjunction with tryptophan and 8-anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonic acid fluorescence data demonstrated that single (L230P) or triple (L230P/L233P/Y236P) proline insertions into the C-terminal alpha helix disrupted the organization of the C-terminal domain without affecting the stability of the N-terminal helix bundle. In contrast, proline insertion into the N terminus (Y18P) disrupted the bundle structure in the N-terminal domain, indicating that the alpha-helical segment in this region is part of the helix bundle. Calorimetric and gel-filtration measurements showed that disruption of the C-terminal alpha helix significantly reduced the enthalpy and free energy of binding of apoA-I to lipids, whereas disruption of the N-terminal alpha helix had only a small effect on lipid binding. Significantly, the presence of the Y18P mutation offset the negative effects of disruption/removal of the C-terminal helical domain on lipid binding, suggesting that the alpha helix around Y18 concealed a potential lipid-binding region in the N-terminal domain, which was exposed by the disruption of the helix-bundle structure. When these results are taken together, they indicate that the alpha-helical segment in the N terminus of apoA-I modulates the lipid-free structure and lipid interaction in concert with the C-terminal domain.     

PAS domain of the Aer redox sensor requires C-terminal residues for native-fold formation and flavin adenine dinucleotide binding

The Aer protein in Escherichia coli is a membrane-bound, FAD-containing aerotaxis and energy sensor that putatively monitors the redox state of the electron transport system. Binding of FAD to Aer requires the N-terminal PAS domain and residues in the F1 region and C-terminal HAMP domain. The PAS domains of other PAS proteins are soluble in water. To investigate properties of the PAS domain, we subcloned segments of the aer gene from E. coli that encode the PAS domain with and without His6 tags and expressed the PAS peptides in E. coli. The 20-kDa His6-Aer2-166 PAS-F1 fragment was purified as an 800-kDa complex by gel filtration chromatography, and the associating protein was identified by N-terminal sequencing as the chaperone protein GroEL. None of the N-terminal fragments of Aer found in the soluble fraction was released from GroEL, suggesting that these peptides do not fold correctly in an aqueous environment and require a motif external to the PAS domain for proper folding. Consistent with this model, peptide fragments that included the membrane binding region and part (Aer2-231) or all (Aer2-285) of the HAMP domain inserted into the membrane, indicating that they were released by GroEL. Aer2-285, but not Aer2-231, bound FAD, confirming the requirement for the HAMP domain in stabilizing FAD binding. The results raise an interesting possibility that residues outside the PAS domain that are required for FAD binding are essential for formation of the PAS native fold.     

Allostery Wiring Diagrams in the Transitions that Drive the GroEL Reaction Cycle

Determining the network of residues that transmit allosteric signals is crucial to understanding the function of biological nanomachines. During the course of a reaction cycle, biological machines in general, and Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL in particular, undergo large-scale conformational changes in response to ligand binding. Normal mode analyses, based on structure-based coarse-grained models where each residue is represented by an α carbon atom, have been widely used to describe the motions encoded in the structures of proteins. Here, we propose a new C^α-side chain elastic network model of proteins that includes information about the physical identity of each residue and accurately accounts for the side-chain topology and packing within the structure. Using the C^α-side chain elastic network model and the structural perturbation method, which probes the response of a local perturbation at a given site at all other sites in the structure, we determine the network of key residues (allostery wiring diagram) responsible for the T → R and R″ → T transitions in GroEL. A number of residues, both within a subunit and at the interface of two adjacent subunits, are found to be at the origin of the positive cooperativity in the ATP-driven T → R transition. Of particular note are residues G244, R58, D83, E209, and K327. Of these, R38, D83, and K327 are highly conserved. G244 is located in the apical domain at the interface between two subunits; E209 and K327 are located in the apical domain, toward the center of a subunit; R58 and D83 are equatorial domain residues. The allostery wiring diagram shows that the network of residues are interspersed throughout the structure. Residues D83, V174, E191, and D359 play a critical role in the R″ → T transition, which implies that mutations of these residues would compromise the ATPase activity. D83 and E191 are also highly conserved; D359 is moderately conserved. The negative cooperativity between the rings in the R″ → T transition is orchestrated through several interface residues within a single ring, including N10, E434, D435, and E451. Signal from the trans ring that is transmitted across the interface between the equatorial domains is responsible for the R″ → T transition. The cochaperonin GroES plays a passive role in the R″ → T transition. Remarkably, the binding affinity of GroES for GroEL is allosterically linked to GroEL residues 350-365 that span helices K and L. The movements of helices K and L alter the polarity of the cavity throughout the GroEL functional cycle and undergo large-scale motions that are anticorrelated with the other apical domain residues. The allostery wiring diagrams for the T → R and R″ → T transitions of GroEL provide a microscopic foundation for the cooperativity (anticooperativity) within (between) the ring (rings). Using statistical coupling analysis, we extract evolutionarily linked clusters of residues in GroEL and GroES. We find that several substrate protein binding residues as well as sites related to ATPase activity belong to a single functional network in GroEL. For GroES, the mobile loop residues and GroES/GroES interface residues are linked.     

Truncation of N-terminal extracellular or C-terminal intracellular domains of human ETA receptor abrogated the binding activity to ET-1.

We have investigated the function of N-terminal and C-terminal domains of the human ETA receptor by expressing truncated mutants in COS-7 cells. Three kinds of ETA receptors truncated in the N-terminal extracellular or C-terminal intracellular domains were produced. Deletion of the entire extracellular N-terminal or intracellular C-terminal domain completely inactivated the ET-1 binding activity. However, the deletion of one half of the N-terminal extracellular domain of the ETA receptor, missing one of two N-linked glycosylation sites, maintained complete binding activity. Specific monoclonal antibodies detected all the truncated ETA receptors in the cell membrane fraction of transfected COS-7 cells. The size of the ETA receptor was heterogeneous due to differential glycosylation and distributed in 48K, 45K and 42K dalton bands in Western blot analysis. These results demonstrated that a part of the N-terminal domain in close proximity to the first transmembrane region is required for the ligand binding activity of the ETA receptor, and the C-terminal domain is perhaps necessary as an anchor for maintenance of the binding site.     

Discovery of critical Tol A-binding residues in the bactericidal toxin colicin N: a biophysical approach

Colicins translocate across the Escherichia coli outer membrane and periplasm by interacting with several receptors. After first binding to outer membrane surface receptors via their central region, they interact with TolA or TonB proteins via their N-terminal regions. Finally, the toxic C-terminal region is inserted into or across the cytoplasmic membrane. We have measured the binding of colicin N to TolA by isothermal titration microcalorimetry (ITC) and tryptophan fluorescence. The isolated N-terminal domain exhibits a higher affinity for TolA ( K _d = 1 μM) than does the whole colicin (18 μM), and similar behaviour has been observed when the N-terminal domain of the g3p protein of the bacteriophage fd, which also binds TolA, is examined in isolation and in situ . This may indicate a similar mechanism in which a cryptic TolA binding site is revealed after primary receptor binding. The isolated colicin N N-terminal domain appears to be unstructured in circular dichroism and fluorescence studies. We have used mutagenesis and ITC to characterize the TolA binding site and have shown it to be of a different sequence and much further from the N-terminus than previously thought.     

A heptapeptide repeat contributes to the unusual length of chloroplast ribosomal protein S18. Nucleotide sequence and map position of the rpl33-rps18 gene cluster in maize.

The rpl33-rps18 gene cluster of the maize chloroplast genome has been mapped and sequenced. The derived amino acid sequence of the S18 protein shows a 7-fold repeat of a hydrophilic heptapeptide domain, S K Q P F R K, in the N-terminal region. Such a sequence is absent in the E. coli S18 and in the chloroplast S18 of the lower plant liverwort. In tobacco and rice chloroplast S18 it is present 2 and 6 times, respectively. Thus a long N-terminal repeat (resembling in composition the large C-terminal heptapeptide repeat in the eukaryotic pol II) appears to be characteristic of monocot cereal S18.     

Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved charged amino acid residues in ClpB from Escherichia coli

ClpB is a member of a multichaperone system in Escherichia coli (with DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE) that reactivates strongly aggregated proteins. The sequence of ClpB contains two ATP-binding domains, each containing Walker consensus motifs. The N- and C-terminal sequence regions of ClpB do not contain known functional motifs. In this study, we performed site-directed mutagenesis of selected charged residues within the Walker A motifs (Lys212 and Lys611) and the C-terminal region of ClpB (Asp797, Arg815, Arg819, and Glu826). We found that the mutations K212T, K611T, D797A, R815A, R819A, and E826A did not significantly affect the secondary structure of ClpB. The mutation of the N-terminal ATP-binding site (K212T), but not of the C-terminal ATP-binding site (K611T), and two mutations within the C-terminal domain (R815A and R819A) inhibited the self-association of ClpB in the absence of nucleotides. The defects in self-association of these mutants were also observed in the presence of ATP and ADP. The four mutants K212T, K611T, R815A, and R819A showed an inhibition of chaperone activity, which correlated with their low ATPase activity in the presence of casein. Our results indicate that positively charged amino acids that are located along the intersubunit interface (this includes Lys212 in the Walker A motif of the N-terminal ATP-binding domain as well as Arg815 and Arg819 in the C-terminal domain) participate in intersubunit salt bridges and stabilize the ClpB oligomer. Interestingly, we have identified a conserved residue within the C-terminal domain (Arg819) which does not participate directly in nucleotide binding but is essential for the chaperone activity of ClpB.     

Identification of the protease-binding domain in the N-terminal region of the influenza A virus matrix protein M1]

A region responsible for protease binding by influenza virus (Flu) matrix protein M1 was identified. Trypsin binding was attributed to the N-terminal 9-kDa fragment obtained by hydrolyzing M1 with formic acid. The binding was inhibited by monoclonal antibodies (mAb) to the N-terminal moiety and by antiserum to region 21-45 of M1, whereas mAb to the middle and C-terminal regions had no effect. Thus, the protease-binding domain (PBD) was mapped to the N-terminal moiety of M1.     

Isolation, cloning and structural characterisation of boophilin, a multifunctional Kunitz-type proteinase inhibitor from the cattle tick

Inhibitors of coagulation factors from blood-feeding animals display a wide variety of structural motifs and inhibition mechanisms. We have isolated a novel inhibitor from the cattle tick Boophilus microplus, one of the most widespread parasites of farm animals. The inhibitor, which we have termed boophilin, has been cloned and overexpressed in Escherichia coli. Mature boophilin is composed of two canonical Kunitz-type domains, and inhibits not only the major procoagulant enzyme, thrombin, but in addition, and by contrast to all other previously characterised natural thrombin inhibitors, significantly interferes with the proteolytic activity of other serine proteinases such as trypsin and plasmin. The crystal structure of the bovine alpha-thrombin.boophilin complex, refined at 2.35 A resolution reveals a non-canonical binding mode to the proteinase. The N-terminal region of the mature inhibitor, Q16-R17-N18, binds in a parallel manner across the active site of the proteinase, with the guanidinium group of R17 anchored in the S(1) pocket, while the C-terminal Kunitz domain is negatively charged and docks into the basic exosite I of thrombin. This binding mode resembles the previously characterised thrombin inhibitor, ornithodorin which, unlike boophilin, is composed of two distorted Kunitz modules. Unexpectedly, both boophilin domains adopt markedly different orientations when compared to those of ornithodorin, in its complex with thrombin. The N-terminal boophilin domain rotates 9 degrees and is displaced by 6 A, while the C-terminal domain rotates almost 6 degrees accompanied by a 3 A displacement. The reactive-site loop of the N-terminal Kunitz domain of boophilin with its P(1) residue, K31, is fully solvent exposed and could thus bind a second trypsin-like proteinase without sterical restraints. This finding explains the formation of a ternary thrombin.boophilin.trypsin complex, and suggests a mechanism for prothrombinase inhibition in vivo.     

Analyses in transfected cells and in vitro of a putative peroxisomal targeting signal of rat liver serine:pyruvate aminotransferase

Serine:pyruvate aminotransferase (SPT; EC 2.6.1.51) of rat liver is a unique enzyme in that it is located in both mitochondria and peroxisomes. To analyze a peroxisomal targeting signal (PTS) of SPT, we constructed in this study various peroxisomal SPT clones having mutations at the C-terminal 20-amino acid region in which a putative PTS is located, and we examined subcellular localization of mutated products expressed in transfected COS-1 cells. When the mutant SPTs were unstable in transfected COS-1 cells, their translocation into peroxisomes was examined using an in vitro peroxisomal import system. Deletion of the C-terminal tripeptide, NKL, and amino acid substitution of K2 (the second lysine from the C-terminus), K4, or E15 abolished or impaired the peroxisomal import of the translated product, resulting in cytosolic accumulation in the cell. In the cases of mutation of R18G, D19A, or K2Q and the conversion to proline of L9, L13, V17, or A20, no products were detected in transfected cells. However, the results of an in vitro peroxisomal import experiment showed that the mutation of L9P, L13P, V17P, and A20P caused loss of the PTS function. When serine was introduced instead of N3 to generate a typical PTS1, the SKL motif, at the C-terminus, all of the proteins having mutations at P5, E11, R12, or E15 showed extensive localization in peroxisomes. These results suggest that the putative C-terminal PTS of SPT is not equivalent to the typical PTS1 shown in acyl-CoA oxidase and urate oxidase, because the PTS of SPT is not restricted to the C-terminal tripeptide. The results also suggest that the alpha-helical structure of the C-terminal region of SPT is important for the stable conformation of the enzyme and the peroxisomal targeting function of its PTS.     

Differential membrane binding of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 matrix protein.

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 matrix protein (p17MA) plays a central role at both the early and late stages of the virus life cycle. During viral assembly, the p17MA domain of Pr55gag promotes membrane association, which is essential for the formation of viral particles. When viral infection occurs, the mature p17MA dissociates from the plasma membrane and participates in the nuclear targeting process. Thus, p17MA contains a reversible membrane binding signal to govern its differential subcellular localization and biological functions. We previously identified a membrane binding signal within the amino-terminal 31 amino acids of the matrix domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Gag, consisting of myristate and a highly basic region (W. Zhou, L. J. Parent, J. W. Wills, and M. D. Resh, J. Virol. 68:2556-2569, 1994). Here we show that exposure of this membrane binding signal is regulated in different Gag protein contexts. Within full-length Pr55gag, the membrane targeting signal is exposed and can direct Pr55gag as well as heterologous proteins to the plasma membrane. However, in the context of p17MA alone, this signal is hidden and unable to confer plasma membrane binding. To investigate the molecular mechanism for regulation of membrane binding, a series of deletions within p17MA was generated by sequentially removing alpha-helical regions defined by the nuclear magnetic resonance structure. Removal of the last alpha helix (amino acids 97 to 109) of p17MA was associated with enhancement of binding to biological membranes in vitro and in vivo. Liposome binding experiments indicated that the C-terminal region of p17MA exerts a negative effect on the N-terminal MA membrane targeting domain by sequestering the myristate signal. We propose that mature p17MA adopts a conformation different from that of the p17MA domain within Pr55gag and present evidence to support this hypothesis. It is likely that such a conformational change results in an N-terminal myristyl switch which governs differential membrane binding.     

GroEL Recognizes an Amphipathic Helix and Binds to the Hydrophobic Side

GroEL is an essential Escherichia coli molecular chaperon that uses ATP to facilitate correct folding of a range of proteins in a cell. Central to the GroEL substrate diversity is how GroEL recognizes the substrates. The interaction between GroEL and substrate has been proposed to be largely hydrophobic because GroEL interacts with proteins in non-native conformations but not in native forms. Analysis of GroEL substrate proteins reveals that one of its main substrates are proteins with αβ folding domains, suggesting that GroEL may stabilize the collapsed αβ core by binding to hydrophobic surfaces that are usually buried between the α and β elements. In this study, we characterize the interaction between GroEL and a peptide derived from our previous selection via a phage display method. NMR studies map the peptide-binding site to the region containing Helices H and I, which is consistent with evidence that this region comprises the primary substrate-binding site. The peptide is largely unstructured in solution but adopts a helical conformation when bound to the GroEL apical domain with a moderate affinity (K_d = 17.1 ± 2.5 μm). The helical conformation aligns residues to form an amphipathic structure, and the hydrophobic side of this amphipathic helix interacts with GroEL as suggested by fluorescence quenching studies. Together with previous structural studies on the GroEL-peptide complexes, our work supports the notion that the amphipathic secondary elements in the substrate proteins may be the structural motif recognized by GroEL.The bacterial chaperonin GroEL and its co-chaperonin GroES are essential for cell viability by assisting folding of a wide range of proteins via an ATP-dependent mechanism (1–3). Structurally, fourteen 57-kDa GroEL subunits assemble into two back-to-back stacking heptameric rings, giving rise to two functionally independent central cavities (4). Each GroEL subunit folds into three distinctive domains: equatorial domain, intermediate domain, and apical domain. The equatorial domains contain the ATP-binding sites and provide most of the intra-ring interactions and all the inter-ring interactions. The apical domains form the rims of the central cavities and contain the binding sites for the substrate proteins and GroES. The intermediate domains link the apical domains and the equatorial domains. For the co-chaperonin GroES, seven GroES subunits, of 10 kDa each, assemble into a heptamer ring (5, 6). In forming the GroEL-GroES complex, GroES caps one end of GroEL, and large structural changes are observed in both GroEL and GroES (7). In GroEL, the apical domain is rotated 90° along its axis and 60° upwards, and the intermediate domain is closed down ∼25° to the equatorial domain. A loop in GroES (residues 17–33) that is unstructured in the isolated GroES adopts a β-turn structure and forms contact with the GroEL apical domain. Compared with the unliganded GroEL, the volume of the enclosed GroEL-GroES cavity is doubled, and the surface lining the wall of the GroEL cavity changes from hydrophobic to hydrophilic.A wealth of information derived from both intensive biochemical and structural characterizations has revealed a general role of GroEL-GroES in assisting protein folding (see reviews in Refs. 3, 8, and 9). Briefly, GroEL binds the substrate proteins in their aggregation-prone non-native states, preventing them from aggregating. Binding of ATP to the substrate occupied GroEL ring (cis-ring) presumably induces large conformational change in GroEL that promotes binding of GroES to the cis-ring. As a result of ATP and GroES binding, the substrate protein is displaced into the GroEL central cavity, initiating the folding process. Both hydrolysis of ATP in the cis-ring and binding of ATP to the substrate unoccupied ring (trans ring) weaken the GroES-GroEL interaction, and ATP binding to the trans ring results in the dissociation of GroES from GroEL, releasing substrate from the central cavity of GroEL. The released substrate may continue folding into the native state if in a folding competent state or may rebind to GroEL if it is still misfolded.One of the most intriguing aspects of the GroE-assisted folding is the substrate promiscuity. It has been shown that about 300 Escherichia coli proteins can interact with GroEL, and these proteins are diverse in terms of both structures and functions (10). A range of techniques have been applied to investigate this important yet complex aspect, and salient features regarding GroEL-substrate interactions have emerged. The apical domains, on the rim of the GroEL central cavity, contain the main substrate-binding site (11–13). Structural flexibility, reflected by both high temperature factors of the apical domain in the crystal structure of tetradecameric GroEL (14) and conformational multiplicity around Helix H and I (15), is proposed to account for the diverse spectrum of GroEL substrates. Mutational studies on GroEL suggest that the GroEL-substrate interactions are largely hydrophobic (16). Structural study on GroEL-substrate interaction, however, is hindered mainly because of the multiple conformations of the bound substrate protein. Very recently, NMR techniques have been used to directly investigate the bound conformations of the substrate (17, 18); yet the nature of GroEL-substrate interaction is not revealed. Peptides may mimic segments of substrate proteins, and studies of GroEL-peptide interactions have uncovered detailed intermolecular interactions and provided insights into principles of substrate recognition by GroEL. The bound peptides may adopt α-helix (19–23), β-hairpin (15), or extended conformations (24), and despite different conformations, they all appear to bind to Helix H and I of GroEL. Hydrophobic interaction dominates the interface between GroEL and peptides in either β-hairpin or extended structures and is proposed so between GroEL and α-helical peptides. These detailed structural characterizations on GroEL-peptide interactions have contributed to dissecting the complex nature of the substrate recognition by GroEL (25).We previously identified a high affinity peptide (strong binding peptide (SBP))² for GroEL using a phage display method and found that SBP adopts a β-hairpin structure bound to GroEL (15, 26). To investigate the contribution of the β-turn in SBP to the GroEL-SBP interaction, we have created various SBP variants with the intension to disrupt the β-turn structure and have studied their binding to GroEL. One of the peptides (termed SBP-W2DP6V), however, adopts a helical conformation when bound to GroEL by NMR analysis. NMR results also map the peptide-binding site on GroEL to be a region formed by Helix H and I. The helical peptide has an amphipathic feature, and fluorescence studies provide direct evidence that the hydrophobic face is involved in the interaction with GroEL. Our structural analysis, combined with previous studies, suggests that GroEL recognizes the amphipathic property in the secondary structures of the substrate protein and binds preferably to the hydrophobic side of these structural elements to stabilize and preserve their structures.     

The N-terminal domain of the reticulocyte-type 15-lipoxygenase is not essential for enzymatic activity but contains determinants for membrane binding

The rabbit reticulocyte-type 15-lipoxygenase is capable of oxygenating biomembranes and lipoproteins without the preceding action of ester lipid cleaving enzymes. This reaction requires an efficient membrane binding, and the N-terminal beta-barrel domain of the enzyme has been implicated in this process. To obtain detailed information on the structural requirements for membrane oxygenation, we expressed the rabbit wild-type 15-lipoxygenase, its beta-barrel deletion mutant (catalytic domain), and several lipoxygenase point mutations as His-tagged fusion proteins in Escherichia coli and tested their membrane binding characteristics. We found that: (i) the beta-barrel deletion mutant was catalytically active and its enzymatic properties (K(M), V(max), pH optimum, substrate specificity) were similar to those of the wild-type enzyme; (ii) when compared with the wild-type lipoxygenase, the membrane binding properties of the N-terminal truncation mutant were impaired but not abolished, suggesting a role of the catalytic domain in membrane binding; and (iii) Phe-70 and Leu-71 (constituents of the beta-barrel domain) but also Trp-181, which is located in the catalytic domain, were identified as sequence determinants for membrane binding. Mutation of these amino acids to more polar residues (F70H, L71K, W181E) impaired the membrane binding capacity of the recombinant enzyme. These data indicate that the C-terminal catalytic domain of the rabbit 15-lipoxygenase is enzymatically active and that the membrane binding properties of the enzyme are determined by a concerted action of the N-terminal beta-barrel and the C-terminal catalytic domain.     

Ezrin/radixin/moesin: versatile controllers of signaling molecules and of the cortical cytoskeleton

Ezrin, radixin and moesin (ERM) proteins are widely distributed proteins located in the cellular cortex, in microvilli and adherens junctions. They feature an N-terminal membrane binding domain linked by an alpha-helical domain to the C-terminal actin-binding domain. In the dormant state, binding sites in the N-terminal domain are masked by interactions with the C-terminal region. The alpha-helical domain also contributes to masking of binding sites. A specific sequence of signaling events results in dissociation of these intramolecular interactions resulting in ERM activation. ERM molecules have been implicated in mediating actin-membrane linkage and in regulating signaling molecules. They are involved in cell membrane organization, cell migration, phagocytosis and apoptosis, and may also play cell-specific roles in tumor progression. Their precise involvement in these processes has yet to be elucidated.