To misfold or to lose structure?: Detection and degradation of oxidized proteins by the 20S proteasome

Aggregation of proteins damaged by stress is often a causal factor of cell death. To prevent aggregation, eukaryotic cells rapidly degrade damaged proteins by engaging two types of proteasomes. The first type is the 26S proteasome (26SP) which is composed of a cylindrical proteolytic core—the 20S proteasome (20SP)—and one or two regulatory particles (RPs) that interact with ubiquitinated proteins. The second type is the free 20SP which mediates ubiquitin-independent proteolysis. We have recently shown that loss of RP function in Arabidopsis leads to an expected decrease in 26SP-dependent protein degradation and hypersensitivity to stresses that induce protein misfolding. Surprisingly, RP mutants have increased 20SP activity and tolerance to oxidative stress. This finding suggests that misfolded proteins carry one type of degradation signal that steers them to ubiquitination enzymes and the 26SP, while oxidatively damaged proteins carry another that guides them directly to the 20SP for degradation. Here we suggest that protein oxidation induces the formation of unstructured regions that serve as targeting signals for 20SP-dependent proteolysis.Key words: 20S proteasome, misfolded proteins, oxidized proteins, ubiquitin-independent proteolysis, unstructured regionsProteasomes are an essential component of the quality-control system that limits the accumulation of non-functional proteins in the cell.^1–4 A protein can be rendered non-functional by mutations, translational and folding errors, and adverse conditions such as heat shock and oxidative stress. These proteins decrease the efficiency of metabolic pathways not only because of their loss of function, but also because of the deleterious gain-of-function effects generally known as proteotoxicity.^1–4 Until recently, it was widely accepted that the detection and degradation of all non-functional proteins is initiated by their loss of native tertiary structure followed by misfolding. Misfolding is believed to expose hydrophobic regions that form interaction domains for chaperones, which are in turn bound to ubiquitin ligases that label the target for 26SP-dependent proteolysis.^5–9 Thus, the degradation of proteins that have lost their native conformation was considered to be an ubiquitin (Ub)- and 26SP-dependent process (Fig. 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Model for the degradation of damaged proteins. (A) Stresses such as heat shock or the incorporation of amino acid analogues induce protein misfolding. If for example, a globular protein is misfolded, its hydrophobic core will be exposed to the cytoplasm. These hydrophobic regions can bind chaperones that either repair the misfolded protein or shuttle it to the ubiquitination enzymes and the 26SP. (B) Protein oxidation leads to a partial loss of secondary structure without disrupting the overall folding pattern of the protein, resulting in flexible, unstructured regions. These regions serve as degradation signals for the Ub-independent 20SP pathway.However, a number of studies have shown that the degradation of proteins damaged by oxidative stress follows another route: oxidized proteins are degraded by the 20SP in a Ub-independent manner.^5–7,10 We have recently shown that this proteolysis pathway is important for oxidative stress tolerance in plants. Loss of function of the Arabidopsis RP subunits RPT2a, RPN10 and RPN12a reduces 26SP function and leads to an expected decrease in Ub-dependent proteolysis.^11–14 Unexpectedly, all three RP mutants have increased 20SP activity, which is probably caused by the stabilization of an activator of proteasome biogenesis that is normally degraded by the 26SP.¹¹ This shift in proteasome activity leads to increased oxidized protein turnover and oxidative stress tolerance, but also to decreased tolerance to stresses that are known to cause protein misfolding.¹¹ Thus, the 26SP in Arabidopsis is needed for the removal of misfolded proteins, and the 20SP is essential for the degradation of oxidized proteins.This differential degradation of damaged proteins implies that plant cells have distinct recognition mechanisms for misfolded and oxidized proteins, and that oxidation leads to the formation of a specific degradation signal that channels the oxidized proteins directly to the 20SP. Nevertheless, it has been suggested that the proteolysis of oxidized proteins also depends on misfolding and exposure of hydrophobic regions that serve as recognition sites for either the 20SP itself or for specific chaperonins that bind the 20SP.^5–7,10,15 If the recognition of proteasomal targets is specific, then—according to the current theory—heat shock and oxidative stress would expose specific types of hydrophobic degradation signals in any cellular protein. These qualitatively different hydrophobic regions would lead either to ubiquitination and 26SP-dependent degradation or to a direct interaction with the 20SP. While we cannot exclude this, it is hard to envision how a random process such as misfolding would produce discernable degradation signals dependent on whether the denaturation was caused by heat shock or by oxidation. An alternative explanation is that the recognition of oxidized proteins does not depend on misfolding.How would oxidized proteins then be targeted to the 20SP? Today we know of some functional proteins that are degraded by the 20SP in a Ub-independent manner, and all these characterized 20SP targets have regions that lack secondary structure.^10,16 The native unstructured regions or intrinsically disordered regions give conformational plasticity to a protein and allow it to form a complex with different partners.^17,18 The unstructured regions are also thought to serve as initiation sites for proteolysis.¹⁹ These findings are a starting point for the “degradation by default” theory which states that many proteins in their native conformation contain unstructured regions that make them inherently unstable and target them to the Ub-independent 20SP pathway.¹⁰ Such proteins tend to be stabilized by forming complexes in which the unstructured regions are masked by other polypeptides. Since oxidized proteins are processed by the 20SP, their common degradation signal could also be an intrinsically disordered region (Fig. 1). Thus, protein oxidation—at least mild protein oxidation⁶—would lead to the formation of flexible peptide stretches (i.e., unstructured regions) rather than to protein misfolding (i.e., unfolding and non-native refolding that exposes otherwise sequestered hydrophobic residues). This hypothesis is supported by a study of the 20SP-dependent degradation of oxidized calmodulin (CaM).²⁰ Oxidation of CaM leads to a significant increase in its 20SP-dependent and Ub-independent degradation. In vitro studies revealed a positive correlation between decreased secondary structure (i.e., increased flexibility) and proteolysis rate, and no correlation between changes in surface hydrophobicity and CaM stability.²⁰There is another paradox concerning 20SP-dependent proteolysis of oxidized proteins. The 20SP is a barrel-shaped particle composed of two α and two β rings in an α7β7b7β7 configuration.²¹ Proteolytic activity is confined to the β rings and is broad range, so that it degrades any target into oligopeptides of 3–25 amino acids in length. To be degraded, targets must not only be recognized by the 20SP, but must also enter into the proteolytic chamber through a constriction in the α rings known as the α-annulus. In 26SP-dependent proteolysis, this entry point is opened by the action of a ring of AAA ATPases from the RP.²¹ However, this entrance gate of the free 20SP is closed and restricts random proteolysis. How then do oxidized proteins enter the proteolytic chamber? It has been shown that some natively unstructured proteins can open the gates possibly by acting as chaotropes and by causing subunit residues to become disordered.²² This then could also be the entry mechanism for oxidized proteins.In conclusion, analyses of Arabidopsis proteasome mutants with decreased Ub-dependent proteolysis reveals that the 20SP-dependent “degradation by the default” pathway is operational in plants and is important for oxidative stress tolerance. However, it remains to be shown whether indeed the unstructured regions, either innate or formed by the action of free radicals, guide proteins to the 20SP and specifically cause the opening of the α-annulus. The identities of native 20SP targets in plants also await further studies.     

NOXA, a sensor of proteasome integrity, is degraded by 26S proteasomes by an ubiquitin-independent pathway that is blocked by MCL-1

Ubiquitin (Ub)-mediated proteasome-dependent proteolysis is critical in regulating multiple biological processes including apoptosis. We show that the unstructured BH3-only protein, NOXA, is degraded by an Ub-independent mechanism requiring 19S regulatory particle (RP) subunits of the 26S proteasome, highlighting the possibility that other unstructured proteins reported to be degraded by 20S proteasomes in vitro may be bona fide 26S proteasome substrates in vivo. A lysine-less NOXA (NOXA-LL) mutant, which is not ubiquitinated, is degraded at a similar rate to wild-type NOXA. Myeloid cell leukemia 1, but not other anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family proteins, stabilizes NOXA by interaction with the NOXA BH3 domain. Depletion of 19S RP subunits, but not alternate proteasome activator REG subunits, increases NOXA half-life in vivo. A NOXA-LL mutant, which is not ubiquitinated, also requires an intact 26S proteasome for degradation. Depletion of the 19S non-ATPase subunit, PSMD1 induces NOXA-dependent apoptosis. Thus, disruption of 26S proteasome function by various mechanisms triggers the rapid accumulation of NOXA and subsequent cell death strongly implicating NOXA as a sensor of 26S proteasome integrity.     

Functional Characterization of Rpn3 Uncovers a Distinct 19S Proteasomal Subunit Requirement for Ubiquitin-Dependent Proteolysis of Cell Cycle Regulatory Proteins in Budding Yeast

By selectively eliminating ubiquitin-conjugated proteins, the 26S proteasome plays a pivotal role in a large variety of cellular regulatory processes, particularly in the control of cell cycle transitions. Access of ubiquitinated substrates to the inner catalytic chamber within the 20S core particle is mediated by the 19S regulatory particle (RP), whose subunit composition in budding yeast has been recently elucidated. In this study, we have investigated the cell cycle defects resulting from conditional inactivation of one of these RP components, the essential non-ATPase Rpn3/Sun2 subunit. Using temperature-sensitive mutant alleles, we show that rpn3 mutations do not prevent the G(1)/S transition but cause a metaphase arrest, indicating that the essential Rpn3 function is limiting for mitosis. rpn3 mutants appear severely compromised in the ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis of several physiologically important proteasome substrates. Thus, RPN3 function is required for the degradation of the G(1)-phase cyclin Cln2 targeted by SCF; the S-phase cyclin Clb5, whose ubiquitination is likely to involve a combination of E3 (ubiquitin protein ligase) enzymes; and anaphase-promoting complex targets, such as the B-type cyclin Clb2 and the anaphase inhibitor Pds1. Our results indicate that the Pds1 degradation defect of the rpn3 mutants most likely accounts for the metaphase arrest phenotype observed. Surprisingly, but consistent with the lack of a G(1) arrest phenotype in thermosensitive rpn3 strains, the Cdk inhibitor Sic1 exhibits a short half-life regardless of the RPN3 genotype. In striking contrast, Sic1 turnover is severely impaired by a temperature-sensitive mutation in RPN12/NIN1, encoding another essential RP subunit. While other interpretations are possible, these data strongly argue for the requirement of distinct RP subunits for efficient proteolysis of specific cell cycle regulators. The potential implications of these data are discussed in the context of possible Rpn3 function in multiubiquitin-protein conjugate recognition by the 19S proteasomal regulatory particle.     

Sem1p is a novel subunit of the 26 S proteasome from Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The 26 S proteasome, which catalyzes degradation of polyubiquitinated proteins, is composed of the 20 S proteasome and the 19 S regulatory particle (RP). The RP is composed of the lid and base subcomplexes and regulates the catalytic activity of the 20 S proteasome. In this study, we carried out affinity purification of the lid and base subcomplexes from the tagged strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and we found that the lid contains a small molecular mass protein, Sem1. The Sem1 protein binds with the 26 S proteasome isolated from a mutant with deletion of SEM1 but not with the 26 S proteasome from the wild type. The lid lacking Sem1 is unstable at a high salt concentration. The 19 S RP was immunoprecipitated together with Sem1 by immunoprecipitation using hemagglutinin epitope-tagged Sem1 as bait. Degradation of polyubiquitinated proteins in vivo or in vitro is impaired in the Sem1-deficient 26 S proteasome. In addition, genetic interaction between SEM1 and RPN10 was detected. The human Sem1 homologue hDSS1 was found to be a functional homologue of Sem1 and capable of interacting with the human 26 S proteasome. The results suggest that Sem1, possibly hDSS1, is a novel subunit of the 26 S proteasome and plays a role in ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis.     

Structure and functional analyses of the 26S proteasome subunits from plants – Plant 26S proteasome

As initial steps to define how the 26S proteasome degrades ubiquitinated proteins in plants, we have characterized many of the subunits that comprise the proteolytic complex from Arabidopsis thaliana. A set of 23 Arabidopsis genes encoding the full complement of core particle (CP) subunits and a collection encoding 12 out of 18 known eukaryotic regulatory particle (RP) subunits, including six AAA-ATPase subunits, were identified. Several of these 26S proteasome genes could complement yeast strains missing the corresponding orthologs. Using this ability of plant subunits to functionally replace yeast counterparts, a parallel structure/function analysis was performed with the RP subunit RPN10/MCB1, a putative receptor for ubiquitin conjugates. RPN10 is not essential for yeast viability but is required for amino acid analog tolerance and degradation of proteins via the ubiquitin-fusion degradation pathway, a subpathway within the ubiquitin system. Surprisingly, we found that the C-terminal motif required for conjugate recognition by RPN10 is not essential for in vivo functions. Instead, a domain near the N-terminus is required. We have begun to exploit the moss Physcomitrella patens as a model to characterize the plant 26S proteasome using reverse genetics. By homologous recombination, we have successfully disrupted the RPN10 gene. Unlike yeast rpn10 strains which grow normally, Physcomitrella rpn10 strains are developmentally arrested, being unable to initiate gametophorogenesis. Further analysis of these mutants revealed that RPN10 is likely required for a developmental program triggered by plant hormones.     

Proteasome disassembly and downregulation is correlated with viability during stationary phase

During prolonged starvation, yeast cells enter a stationary phase (SP) during which the synthesis of many proteins is dramatically decreased. We show that a parallel decrease in proteasome-dependent proteolysis also occurs. The reduction in proteolysis is correlated with disassembly of 26S proteasome holoenzymes into their 20S core particle (CP) and 19S regulatory particle (RP) components. Proteasomes are reassembled, and proteolysis resumes prior to cell cycle reentry. Free 20S CPs are found in an autoinhibited state in which the N-terminal tails from neighboring alpha subunits are anchored by an intricate lattice of interactions blocking the channel that leads into the 20S CPs. By deleting channel gating residues of CP alpha subunits, we generated an "open channel" proteasome that exhibits faster rates of protein degradation both in vivo and in vitro, indicating that gating contributes to regulation of proteasome activity. This open channel mutant is delayed in outgrowth from SP and cannot survive following prolonged starvation. In summary, we have found that the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway can be subjected to global downregulation, that the proteasome is a target of this regulation, and that proteasome downregulation is linked to survival of SP cells. Maintaining high viability during SP is essential for evolutionary fitness, which may explain the extreme conservation of channel gating residues in eukaryotic proteasomes.     

Affinity Purification of the Arabidopsis 26 S Proteasome Reveals a Diverse Array of Plant Proteolytic Complexes

Selective proteolysis in plants is largely mediated by the ubiquitin (Ub)/proteasome system in which substrates, marked by the covalent attachment of Ub, are degraded by the 26 S proteasome. The 26 S proteasome is composed of two subparticles, the 20 S core protease (CP) that compartmentalizes the protease active sites and the 19 S regulatory particle that recognizes and translocates appropriate substrates into the CP lumen for breakdown. Here, we describe an affinity method to rapidly purify epitope-tagged 26 S proteasomes intact from Arabidopsis thaliana. In-depth mass spectrometric analyses of preparations generated from young seedlings confirmed that the 2.5-MDa CP-regulatory particle complex is actually a heterogeneous set of particles assembled with paralogous pairs for most subunits. A number of these subunits are modified post-translationally by proteolytic processing, acetylation, and/or ubiquitylation. Several proteasome-associated proteins were also identified that likely assist in complex assembly and regulation. In addition, we detected a particle consisting of the CP capped by the single subunit PA200 activator that may be involved in Ub-independent protein breakdown. Taken together, it appears that a diverse and highly dynamic population of proteasomes is assembled in plants, which may expand the target specificity and functions of intracellular proteolysis.     

The N-terminal domain of Rpn4 serves as a portable ubiquitin-independent degron and is recognized by specific 19S RP subunits

The number of proteasomal substrates that are degraded without prior ubiquitylation continues to grow. However, it remains poorly understood how the proteasome recognizes substrates lacking a ubiquitin (Ub) signal. Here we demonstrated that the Ub-independent degradation of Rpn4 requires the 19S regulatory particle (RP). The Ub-independent degron of Rpn4 was mapped to an N-terminal region including the first 80 residues. Inspection of its amino acid sequence revealed that the Ub-independent degron of Rpn4 consists of an intrinsically disordered domain followed by a folded segment. Using a photo-crosslinking-label transfer method, we captured three 19S RP subunits (Rpt1, Rpn2 and Rpn5) that bind the Ub-independent degron of Rpn4. This is the first time that specific 19S RP subunits have been identified interacting with a Ub-independent degron. This study provides insight into the mechanism by which Ub-independent substrates are recruited to the 26S proteasome.     

Shigella effector IpaH4.5 targets 19S regulatory particle subunit RPN13 in the 26S proteasome to dampen cytotoxic T lymphocyte activation

Subversion of antigen‐specific immune responses by intracellular pathogens is pivotal for successful colonisation. Bacterial pathogens, including Shigella, deliver effectors into host cells via the type III secretion system (T3SS) in order to manipulate host innate and adaptive immune responses, thereby promoting infection. However, the strategy for subverting antigen‐specific immunity is not well understood. Here, we show that Shigella flexneri invasion plasmid antigen H (IpaH) 4.5, a member of the E3 ubiquitin ligase effector family, targets the proteasome regulatory particle non‐ATPase 13 (RPN13) and induces its degradation via the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS). IpaH4.5‐mediated RPN13 degradation causes dysfunction of the 19S regulatory particle (RP) in the 26S proteasome, inhibiting guidance of ubiquitinated proteins to the proteolytically active 20S core particle (CP) of 26S proteasome and thereby suppressing proteasome‐catalysed peptide splicing. This, in turn, reduces antigen cross‐presentation to CD8+ T cells via major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I in vitro. In RPN13 knockout mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), loss of RPN13 suppressed CD8+ T cell priming during Shigella infection. Our results uncover the unique tactics employed by Shigella to dampen the antigen‐specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response.     

The RPN1 subunit of the 26S proteasome in Arabidopsis is essential for embryogenesis

The 26S proteasome plays a central role in the degradation of regulatory proteins involved in a variety of developmental processes. It consists of two multisubunit protein complexes: the proteolytic core protease and the regulatory particle (RP). The function of most RP subunits is poorly understood. Here, we describe mutants in the Arabidopsis thaliana RPN1 subunit, which is encoded by two paralogous genes, RPN1a and RPN1b. Disruption of RPN1a caused embryo lethality, while RPN1b mutants showed no obvious abnormal phenotype. Embryos homozygous for rpn1a arrested at the globular stage with defects in the formation of the embryonic root, the protoderm, and procambium. Cyclin B1 protein was not degraded in these embryos, consistent with cell division defects. Double mutant plants (rpn1a/RPN1a rpn1b/rpn1b) produced embryos with a phenotype indistinguishable from that of the rpn1a single mutant. Thus, despite their largely overlapping expression patterns in flowers and developing seeds, the two isoforms do not share redundant functions during gametogenesis and embryogenesis. However, complementation of the rpn1a mutation with the coding region of RPN1b expressed under the control of the RPN1a promoter indicates that the two RPN1 isoforms are functionally equivalent. Overall, our data indicate that RPN1 activity is essential during embryogenesis, where it might participate in the destruction of a specific set of protein substrates.     

Identification of a specific motif of the DSS1 protein required for proteasome interaction and p53 protein degradation

Deleted in Split hand/Split foot 1 (DSS1) was previously identified as a novel 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA)-inducible gene with possible involvement in early event of mouse skin carcinogenesis. The mechanisms by which human DSS1 (HsDSS1) exerts its biological effects via regulation of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) are currently unknown. Here, we demonstrated that HsDSS1 regulates the human proteasome by associating with it in the cytosol and nucleus via the RPN3/S3 subunit of the 19S regulatory particle (RP). Molecular anatomy of HsDSS1 revealed an RPN3/S3-interacting motif (R3IM), located at amino acid residues 15 to 21 of the NH(2) terminus. Importantly, negative charges of the R3IM motif were demonstrated to be required for proteasome interaction and binding to poly-ubiquitinated substrates. Indeed, the R3IM motif of HsDSS1 protein alone was sufficient to replace the ability of intact HsDSS1 protein to pull down proteasome complexes and protein substrates with high-molecular mass ubiquitin conjugates. Interestingly, this interaction is highly conserved throughout evolution from humans to nematodes. Functional study, lowering the levels of the endogenous HsDSS1 using siRNA, indicates that the R3IM/proteasome complex binds and targets p53 for ubiquitin-mediated degradation via gankyrin-MDM2/HDM2 pathway. Most significantly, this work indicates that the R3IM motif of HsDSS1, in conjunction with the complexes of 19S RP and 20S core particle (CP), regulates proteasome interaction through RPN3/S3 molecule, and utilizes a specific subset of poly-ubiquitinated p53 as a substrate.     

Down-regulation of the 26S proteasome subunit RPN9 inhibits viral systemic transport and alters plant vascular development

Plant viruses utilize the vascular system for systemic movement. The plant vascular network also transports water, photosynthates, and signaling molecules and is essential for plant growth. However, the molecular mechanisms governing vascular development and patterning are still largely unknown. From viral transport suppressor screening using virus-induced gene silencing, we identified a 26S proteasome subunit, RPN9, which is required for broad-spectrum viral systemic transport. Silencing of RPN9 in Nicotiana benthamiana inhibits systemic spread of two taxonomically distinct viruses, Tobacco mosaic virus and Turnip mosaic virus. The 26S proteasome is a highly conserved eukaryotic protease complex controlling many fundamental biochemical processes, but the functions of many 26S proteasome regulatory subunits, especially in plants, are still poorly understood. We demonstrate that the inhibition of viral systemic transport after RPN9 silencing is largely due to alterations in the vascular tissue. RPN9-silenced plants display extra leaf vein formation with increased xylem and decreased phloem. We further illustrate that RPN9 functions at least in part through regulation of auxin transport and brassinosteroid signaling, two processes that are crucial for vascular formation. We propose that RPN9 regulates vascular formation by targeting a subset of regulatory proteins for degradation. The brassinosteroid-signaling protein BZR1 is one of the targets.     

In vivo relevance of substrate recognition function of major Arabidopsis ubiquitin receptors

Ubiquitylation marks proteins for destruction by the 26S proteasome. These signals are deciphered and targeted by distinct direct and indirect pathways involving a set of evolutionarily conserved ubiquitin receptors. Although biochemical and structural studies have revealed the mechanistic complexity of these substrate recognition pathways, conclusive evidence of the in vivo relevance of their substrate recognition function is currently not available. We recently showed that the structural elements involved in substrate recognition are not responsible for the important roles of the ubiquitin receptor RPN10 in vegetative and reproductive growth or for the abundance of the two-capped proteasomes (RP2-CP). Moreover, Arabidopsis plants subjected to severe knockdown or knockout any of the major ubiquitin receptors displayed wild-type phenotypes. Our results clearly suggest a functional redundancy of the major Arabidopsis ubiquitin receptors, and this evolved multiplicity is probably used to secure the substrates delivery. Based on the reduced abundance of RP2-CP in rpn10-2 and a role of RPN10 in lid-base association, a structural role of RPN10 in 26S proteasome stability is likely to be more relevant in vivo. Further efforts using structural and functional analyses in higher-order mutants to identify the specific biological functions of substrate recognition for the major Arabidopsis ubiquitin receptors are described here.     

The unfolding of substrates and ubiquitin-independent protein degradation by proteasomes

26S proteasomes are composed of a 20S proteolytic core and two ATPase-containing 19S regulatory particles. To clarify the role of these ATPases in proteolysis, we studied the PAN complex, the archaeal homolog of the 19S ATPases. When ATP is present, PAN stimulates protein degradation by archaeal 20S proteasomes. PAN is a molecular chaperone that catalyzes the ATP-dependent unfolding of globular proteins. If 20S proteasomes are present, this unfoldase activity is linked to degradation. Thus PAN, and presumably the 26S ATPases, unfold substrates and facilitate their entry into the 20S particle. 26S proteasomes preferentially degrade ubiquitinated proteins. However, we found that calmodulin (CaM) and troponin C are degraded by 26S proteasomes without ubiquitination. Ca(2+)-free native CaM and in vitro 'aged' CaM are degraded faster than the Ca(2+)-bound form. Ubiquitination of CaM does not enhance its degradation. Degradation of ovalbumin normally requires ubiquitination, but can occur without ubiquitination if ovalbumin is denatured. The degradation of these proteins still requires ATP and the 19S particle. Thus, ubiquitin-independent degradation by 26S proteasomes may be more important than generally assumed.     

Intracellular proteolysis: Signals of selective protein degradation

Selective proteolysis is one of the mechanisms for the maintenance of cell homeostasis via rapid degradation of defective polypeptides and certain short-lived regulatory proteins. In prokaryotic cells, high-molecular-mass oligomeric ATP-dependent proteases are responsible for selective protein degradation. In eukaryotes, most polypeptides are attacked by the multicatalytic 26S proteasome, and the degradation of the majority of substrates involves their preliminary modification with the protein ubiquitin. The proteins undergoing the selective proteolysis often contain specific degradation signals necessary for their recognition by the corresponding proteases. This article is dedicated to the 25th Anniversary of the journal Bioorganicheskaya Khimiya     

Integral UBL domain proteins: a family of proteasome interacting proteins

The family of ubiquitin-like (UBL) domain proteins (UDPs) comprises a conserved group of proteins involved in a multitude of different cellular activities. However, recent studies on UBL-domain proteins indicate that these proteins appear to share a common property in their ability to interact with 26S proteasomes. The 26S proteasome is a multisubunit protease which is responsible for the majority of intracellular proteolysis in eukaryotic cells. Before degradation commences most proteins are first marked for destruction by being coupled to a chain of ubiquitin molecules. Some UBL-domain proteins catalyse the formation of ubiquitin-protein conjugates, whereas others appear to target ubiquitinated proteins for degradation and interact with chaperones. Hence, by binding to the 26S proteasome the UBL-domain proteins seem to tailor and direct the basic proteolytic functions of the particle to accommodate various cellular substrates.     

Stalled proteasomes are directly relieved by P97 recruitment

The 26 S proteasome is the eukaryotic protease responsible for the degradation of most cellular proteins. As such it accommodates the ability to function under diverse conditions that the cell may encounter. This function is supported by various adaptors that modulate various aspects in protein degradation, these include regulation of substrate delivery, deubiquitination, unfolding, and 20 S gate dilation. Here we show a new functional complex between the P97 and the proteasome that is assembled in response to proteasomal impairment. This entails P97 binding to the 26 S proteasome via the 19 S particle thereby forming an additional hexameric ATPase ring to relieve repression. P97-bound proteasomes showed selective binding toward the Npl4-ufd1 P97 co-factors, indicating a unique cellular role for P97 binding to proteasomes. P97-bound proteasomes display enhanced activity, showing a relief in proteolysis impairment. Our findings place P97 directly in non-ERAD proteasomal functions and establish a new checkpoint in UPS impairment. The ability to modulate proteasome activity and properly respond to protein misfolding, is of great importance in cellular regulation.     

Multiple chaperone-assisted formation of mammalian 20S proteasomes

Protein degradation is essential for maintenance of cellular homeostasis. The majority of proteins are selectively degraded in eukaryotic cells by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. The 26S proteasome selects target proteins that are covalently modified with polyubiquitin chains. The 26S proteasome is a multisubunit protease responsible for regulated proteolysis in eukaryotic cells. The catalytic activities are carried out by the core 20S proteasome. The eukaryotic 20S proteasome is composed of 28 subunits arranged in a cylindrical particle as four heteroheptameric rings, alpha1-7beta1-7beta1-7alpha1-7. Recent studies have revealed the mechanism responsible for the assembly of such a complex structure. This article recounts the observations that disclosed the biogenesis of 20S proteasomes and discusses the difference in the mechanism of assembly between archael, yeast, and mammalian 20S proteasomes.