Reassociation of histone H1 with nucleosomes.

The role of histone H1 in nucleosome heterogeneity and structure has been studied using a reconstitution procedure. Histone H1 and non-histone proteins are removed selectively from enzymatically fragmented chromatin by Dowex 50W-X2 treatment. The resulting "stripped" chromatin then is reassociated with purified histone H1 using step gradient dialysis. Material reconstituted in this manner was examined by gel electrophoresis, protein cross-linking, and chromatin fingerprinting. The results demonstrate that the histone H1 molecule efficiently binds to nucleosomes with fidelity in an apparent noncooperative manner. Polynucleosomes possess two specific binding sites for histone H1 per histone octamer; the first binding site is of higher affinity than the second. The 160-base pair nuclease digestion barrier and nucleosome electrophoretic class (MIII)n are established upon binding the 1st histone H1 molecule. Upon binding the 2nd histone H1 molecule, polynucleosomes assume a highly compact conformation. The experimental approach introduced here should permit determining whether nucleosomes possess independent specific binding sites for other chromosomal proteins, and should allow reconstitution of the other electrophoretic forms of nucleosomes which we have described previously.     

A triple helix model for the structure of chromatin fiber

A model of chromatin fiber structure is presented in which a repeating unit of a trinucleosome forms a 3-dimensional zigzag. Twisting and compression of the zigzag result in a triple helix structure. The model is built mainly on the flow linear dichroism data showing that nucleosomal disc faces are tilted relative to the fiber axis, the orientation of nucleosomes does not change upon folding and unfolding of chromatin, and the orientation of nucleosomes is maintained by the globular domain of histone H1.     

Fragmentation of chromatin by endogenous nucleases, accumulation of the subnucleosomal fragments with high electrophoretic mobility]

Digestion of chromatin by endogenous nucleases to nucleosomes (140-160 base pairs of DNA) is accompanied by the accumulation of subnucleosomal DNP particles with high electrophoretic mobility (20-40 base pairs of DNA). All histones associate with the 140-160 base pairs fragment. The production of subnucleosomal DNP particles does not correlate with the degradation of histone H1 and the appearance of nucleosomes lacking histone H1. Degradation of the protein in this fragment is accompanied by the appearance of free DNA. The data obtained are in agreement with the hypothesis on the origin of subnucleosomes from the nucleosomal locus preferentially associated with the non-histone proteins and on the autonomy of these loci and of the loci associated with histone H1 in the nucleosome.     

Unravelled nucleosomes,nucleosome beads and higher order structures of chromatin: Influence of non-histone components and histone H1

Effects of non-histone components and histone H1 on the morphology of nucleosomes and chromatin were studied by electron microscopy. Soluble rat liver ehromatin was depleted of non-histone components [NH]or non-histone components and H1 [NH and H1] by dissociation and subsequent fractionation in sucrose gradients in the presence of 300 to 350 mm or 500 mm-NaCl, respectively. In reconstitution experiments the depleted samples were mixed either with [NH] or with [NH and H1] or with purified H1. The morphology of the ionic strength-dependent condensation of the samples was monitored by electron microscopy using 0 mm to 100 mm-NaCl. Based on the appearance of the different types of fibres in very low salt (0 mm up to 10 mm-NaCl), namely the zigzag-shaped, the beads-on-a-string or the DNA-like filaments, it is possible to distinguish between nucleosomes, partially unravelled nucleosomes and unravelled nucleosomes, respectively. Only those fibres which were zigzag-shaped at low ionic strength condense at increasing ionic strength into higher order structures of compact fibres. We demonstrate the dependence of the appearance of nucleosomes and chromatin upon its composition and upon the ionic strength of the solvent.[NH] have no detectable influence upon the formation of higher order chromatin structures, but they can prevent the unravelling of nucleosomes at very low ionic strength, presumably by charge shielding.For the appearance of zigzag-shaped fibres and for the condensation into compact fibres with increasing ionic strength, H1 must be present in about native amounts. Partial removal of H1 (about 10%) promotes a change from fibres into tangles. This supports the model that an H1 polymer is stabilizing the higher order chromatin structures.Reconstitution experiments with purified H1 regenerated fibres containing all the features of [NH]-depleted chromatin. Reconstitution experiments with [NH and H1] promoted fibres compatible with control chromatin. Overloading of chromatin with H1 led to additional condensation. The detailed morphology of the reconstituted fibres showed local distortions. One possibility explaining these local distortions would be competition between “main” and “additional” binding sites for histone H1.     

Non-histone proteins of soluble nucleoproteins released from mouse myeloma nuclei by mild micrococcal nuclease digestion

Mono- and dinucleosomes preferentially cleaved from mouse myeloma chromatin by very mild micrococcal nuclease digestion at 0 degree C are soluble and are released from nuclei under near-physiological conditions in which normal nucleosomes containing Hl are insoluble. These nucleosomes are highly enriched in RNA, high-mobility-group proteins and a unique subset of other non-histone proteins. They are nearly devoid of histone Hl and contain DNA significantly less methylated than whole myeloma DNA, indicating that they comprise a subset of genomic sequences. Previously we have shown that this fraction is enriched in transcribed DNA sequences. Non-histone proteins that co-sedimented with readily solubilized nucleosomes included many of the most basic, low-to-moderate molecular weight chromosomal proteins. Many of these proteins were also preferentially acetylated in vivo. The residual, pelleted chromatin was highly enriched in high molecular weight proteins (greater than 60 000), and very depleted in medium molecular weight proteins. Readily solubilized nucleoproteins sedimenting like mononucleosomes were partly resolved by electrophoresis, under non-denaturing conditions, into several subfractions differing significantly in non-histone protein contents. Methods described here should be useful for identifying and isolating non-histone proteins bound to nucleosomes and other chromatin regions that are structurally and functionally unique.     

The essential role of Drosophila HIRA for de novo assembly of paternal chromatin at fertilization

In many animal species, the sperm DNA is packaged with male germ line–specific chromosomal proteins, including protamines. At fertilization, these non-histone proteins are removed from the decondensing sperm nucleus and replaced with maternally provided histones to form the DNA replication competent male pronucleus. By studying a point mutant allele of the Drosophila Hira gene, we previously showed that HIRA, a conserved replication-independent chromatin assembly factor, was essential for the assembly of paternal chromatin at fertilization. HIRA permits the specific assembly of nucleosomes containing the histone H3.3 variant on the decondensing male pronucleus. We report here the analysis of a new mutant allele of Drosophila Hira that was generated by homologous recombination. Surprisingly, phenotypic analysis of this loss of function allele revealed that the only essential function of HIRA is the assembly of paternal chromatin during male pronucleus formation. This HIRA-dependent assembly of H3.3 nucleosomes on paternal DNA does not require the histone chaperone ASF1. Moreover, analysis of this mutant established that protamines are correctly removed at fertilization in the absence of HIRA, thus demonstrating that protamine removal and histone deposition are two functionally distinct processes. Finally, we showed that H3.3 deposition is apparently not affected in Hira mutant embryos and adults, suggesting that different chromatin assembly machineries could deposit this histone variant.     

Biochemical characterization of chromatin fractions isolated from induced and uninduced friend erythroleukemia cells

Summary Chromatin fractions from Friend erythroleukemia cells after induction of differentiation by dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) were compared in their biochemical characteristics to fractions from uninduced cells. Fractions were prepared by extracting chromatin from nuclei after mild micrococcal nuclease treatment with increasing concentrations of NaCl according to Sanders [1]. This procedure has been found to release chromatin containing hyperacetylated histones preferentially [2]. The fractions obtained by this procedure were analysed in respect to the amount of chromatin released, the amount of histone H1, the degree of acetylation of histone H4, the presence of non-histone proteins and the concentration of transcribed and non-transcribed sequences. It was found that the fractions differ in the amount of histone H1 present, in several non-histone proteins and in the acetylation of histonie H4, regardless whether induced or uninduced cells were analysed. The distribution of transcribed sequences versus non-transcribed sequences among the fractions was the same, demonstrating that this fractionation procedure, although leading to fractions with biochemical differences, is not able to discriminate functional states of chromatin and that the biochemical characteristics of the fractions may be common to both, active as well as inactive states of chromatin.     

Competition between histone H1 and HMGN proteins for chromatin binding sites

The ability of regulatory factors to access their nucleosomal targets is modulated by nuclear proteins such as histone H1 and HMGN (previously named HMG-14/-17 family) that bind to nucleosomes and either stabilize or destabilize the higher-order chromatin structure. We tested whether HMGN proteins affect the interaction of histone H1 with chromatin. Using microinjection into living cells expressing H1–GFP and photobleaching techniques, we found that wild-type HMGN, but not HMGN point mutants that do not bind to nucleosomes, inhibits the binding of H1 to nucleosomes. HMGN proteins compete with H1 for nucleosome sites but do not displace statically bound H1 from chromatin. Our results provide evidence for in vivo competition among chromosomal proteins for binding sites on chromatin and suggest that the local structure of the chromatin fiber is modulated by a dynamic interplay between nucleosomal binding proteins.     

Porcine follitropin. The amino-acid sequence of the beta subunit

By treatment with tRNA in the presence of 1 mM MgCl2, a chromatin preparation was obtained containing all five major histone fractions but lacking a considerable portion of non-histone proteins. This chromatin preparation as well as chromatin extracted with 0.6 M NaCl (depleted of H1 histone and some non-histone proteins) were characterized in respect of solubility and chromatin DNA accessibility. Both samples possessed practically the same solubility in the presence of 0.15 M NaCl and 1 mM MgCl2. The solubility of tRNA-treated chromatin in 5 and 10 mM MgCl2 was higher than that of salt-extracted chromation. The accessibility of the DNA of these chromatin preparations was tested with DNA-dependent RNA polymerase of Escherichia coli as a probe, using procedure that permits measurement of binding site frequency. Both tRNA-treated and salt-extracted chromatin contained as many as 33% and untreated chromatin as few as 4% of the number of binding sites found on protein-free DNA. These results demonstrate that at least in part the non-histone proteins are responsible for salt-induced insolubility and low DNA accessibility of chromatin, thus revealing the importance of non-histone proteins in the maintenance of an overall chromatin structure.     

The conformation of proteins in chromatin. A circular dichroism study below 250 nm.

This paper is an investigation of the circular dichroism (CD) spectra of DNA and protein in chromatin. The circular dichroism (CD) of chromatin below 250 nm is due to DNA and protein peptide chromophores. The spectrum in this region is resolved into contributions from salt-extractable proteins (histone and non-histone proteins extractable with sodium chloride), residual non-histone proteins (not extractable with 3 M sodium chloride), and DNA. Below 250 nm, DNA in chromatin has the same CD spectrum as DNA free in solution, in contrast to the CD of DNA above 250 nm (Hjelm, R. and Huang, R. C., (1974), Biochemistry 13, 5275). Histones and salt-extractable non-histone proteins in chromatin are seen to have an average CD like those observed for globular proteins. The average CD of the residual non-histone proteins is consistent with a population of proteins with more extended conformation. The CD of each of these components is found to be the same in chromatins isolated from tissues having different nuclear synthetic activities: chick embryo brain, pig cerebellum, myeloma K41, calf thymus, and chicken erythrocyte.     

Form of DNA and the nature of interactions with proteins in chromatin.

Studies of native chromatins and of isolated nucleosomes (from calf thymus) show that the DNA is in the B form or modified B form. This was determined by Raman spectroscopy of chromatins, of nucleosomes (from calf thymus) and of DNA fibres and directly correlated with X-ray diffraction studies. The Raman spectra of three forms of DNA (A, B and C) have been characterized in fibres both by X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy on the same sample. In particular, the Raman spectrum of the C form of DNA is characterized by a band of about 870 cm(-1). For the first time, chromatins of different origins with increasing content of non-histone proteins have been investigated by Raman spectroscopy. The site of interaction of the non-histone proteins appears to involve the N7 position of guanine while the histone core does not interact at this site. It is proposed that the mechanism of specific recognition in chromatin involves the large groove.     

Chromatin Polymorphism and the Nucleosome Superfamily: A Genealogy

Nucleosomes were discovered more than thirty years ago as the basic repeating units of chromatin. Since then, nucleosomes have progressively revealed their taste to come in many appearances, upon either adjunction of other proteins (e.g. a fifth histone or a non-histone protein, HMG-N), histone substitution for isoforms (histone variants), depletion of one or the two H2A-H2B dimers (sub-nucleosomes), intimate two-particle association, or isomeric structural alterations. The resulting entities, some of them are only transient, acquire new properties useful for their specific roles in chromatin function. These structures are presented here in the chronological order of their identification, from the chromatosome to the sub-nucleosomal hexasome and tetrasome, and from the dinucleosomal altosome and nucleodisome to the nucleosome variants and altered forms: the old lexosome and the most recent reversome.     

The role of histone H1 and non-structured domains of core histones in maintaining the orientation of nucleosomes within the chromatin fiber

Calf thymus chromatin was digested with trypsin and the structural alterations which occurred were followed by flow linear dichroism. After a sharp initial increase, the amplitude of the positive signal gradually decreased followed by a change of the sign of the dichroism and further increase of the negative signal up to a plateau. These changes of the dichroism were compared to the respective changes in the histone pattern. It was shown that the positive dichroism of chromatin did not depend on the condensation state of chromatin, and that the orientation of the nucleosomes along the chromatin fiber was maintained by the globular domain of H1 and the non-structured parts of core histones.     

Role of non-histone proteins in chromatin solubility

Treatment of chromatin gel with low ionic strength solution of tRNA has produced the dioxyribonucleoprotein (dnptRNA) in which only part of non-histone proteins was removed without loss of any major histone fraction. The solubility of DNP in the presence of 0.15 M NaCl and 1 to 5 mM MgCl2 was considerably higher than that of initial untreated chromatin. It has been assumed that the solubility of chromatin depended primarily on some non-histone proteins and not on H1 histone.     

Interaction of chromatin with a histone H1 containing swapped N- and C-terminal domains

Although the details of the structural involvement of histone H1 in the organization of the nucleosome are quite well understood, the sequential events involved in the recognition of its binding site are not as well known. We have used a recombinant human histone H1 (H1.1) in which the N- and C-terminal domains (NTD/CTD) have been swapped and we have reconstituted it on to a 208-bp nucleosome. We have shown that the swapped version of the protein is still able to bind to nucleosomes through its structurally folded wing helix domain (WHD); however, analytical ultracentrifuge analysis demonstrates its ability to properly fold the chromatin fibre is impaired. Furthermore, FRAP analysis shows that the highly dynamic binding association of histone H1 with the chromatin fibre is altered, with a severely decreased half time of residence. All of this suggests that proper binding of histone H1 to chromatin is determined by the simultaneous and synergistic binding of its WHD–CTD to the nucleosome.