一氧化氮(NO)在植物逆境响应中的作用

简要介绍了有关一氧化氮(NO)在植物非生物胁迫响应中生理作用的研究现状,并对与这一问题相关的研究趋势作了分析和讨论.     

一氧化氮(NO)对海洋浮游植物的作用

该文介绍海洋浮游植物内源一氧化氮(NO)的产生,NO对海洋浮游植物生长的作用,以及有关NO在海洋浮游植物环境胁迫响应中生理作用的研究现状,并对与这些问题相关的研究趋势作了分析和讨论。     

植物一氧化氮(NO)研究进展

一氧化氮(NO)是植物的重要生物活性分子,它参与植物生长发育的许多过程,如种子萌发、下胚轴伸长、叶扩展、根生长、侧根形成、细胞凋亡以及植物抗逆反应等。大量的证据表明,植物可以通过与动物NO合酶类似的酶产生NO。此外,植物还可通过硝酸还原酶产生NO。NO在植物中的信号传递途径仍不十分清楚,植物有可能采用与动物相类似的机制。由于植物的大多数生长发育现象都受到植物激素的调节和控制,NO与植物激素之间的关系也受到越来越多的关注。通过激素起作用可能是植物内源NO作用的机理之一。     

植物一氧化氮(NO)研究进展

一氧化氮（NO）是植物的重要生物活性分子,它参与植物生长发育的许多过程,如种子萌发、下胚轴伸长、叶扩展、根生长、侧根形成、细胞凋亡以及植物抗逆反应等。大量的证据表明,植物可以通过与动物NO合酶类似的酶产生NO。此外,植物还可通过硝酸还原酶产生NO。NO在植物中的信号传递途径仍不十分清楚,植物有可能采用与动物相类似的机制。由于植物的大多数生长发育现象都受到植物激素的调节和控制,NO与植物激素之间的关系也受到越来越多的关注。通过激素起作用可能是植物内源NO作用的机理之一。     

一氧化氮在炎性疼痛中的作用

一氧化氮（nitric oxide,NO）是细胞内重要的信使分子和神经递质,它参与多种生命活动,包括炎性疼痛.NO对炎性疼痛的发展和维持起到了重要的作用.研究NO在疼痛中所起到的作用及其机制有利于阐明痛觉生理和发现疼痛治疗的新手段.目前研究表明,脊髓水平NO参与炎性疼痛调制的可能机制主要有NO/cGMP途径、参与调控即刻早期基因、与其他神经递质的协同作用.另外研究表明,3种类型的一氧化氮合酶（nitric oxide synthases,NOS）在炎性疼痛过程中被激活或者有不同程度的增强表达.     

内源性一氧化氮在感染性休克中的作用

内源性一氧化氮（ＮＯ）是一种机体合成的具有多种生物学功能的小分子化合物。在感染性休克中，机体可大量生产ＮＯ。体内存在诱导性和结构性两种ＮＯ合成酶。ＮＯ合成抑制剂对感染性休克的作用与药物剂量，实验动物被感染的方式及其状态有关。ＮＯ合成抑制剂已试用于临床感染性休克的治疗，但须对其有效浓度、毒副作用、与其他药物的合理组合及药品规范化作进一步研究。     

一氧化氮在缺氧耐受形成中的作用

分别给小鼠腹腔注射Ｌ－精氨酸（５０ｍｇ／ｋｇ）、Ｌ－精氨酸类似物Ｎω－ＮＩＴＲＯ－Ｌ－ＡＲＧＩＮＩＮＥ（５０ｍｇ／ｋｇ）,３０ｍｉｎ后进行急性缺氧重复实验。结果发现,Ｌ－精氨酸、Ｌ－精氨酸类似物组第一次缺氧耐受性时间平均为１１ｍｉｎ、１６ｍｉｎ,分别近似于、高于盐水对照组小鼠的第一次平均耐受时间（１２ｍｉｎ）。Ｌ－精氨酸组、Ｌ－精氨酸类似物组第二、三、四次重复缺氧的耐受时间分别为其各自第一次缺氧耐受时间的２．０、２．７、３．１;２．６、３．７、４．９倍,分别略低于、明显高于对照组（对照组第二、三、四次重复缺氧的耐受时间分别为其第一次缺氧耐受时间的２．２、３．１、３．６倍）。用荧光方法测定正常对照组第一、二、三、四次缺氧组脑内一氧化氮的含量,结果发现,一次缺氧组一氧化氮含量明显高于正常对照组,二、三、四次缺氧组,一氧化氮含量比一次缺氧组明显回降,结果提示,脑内一氧化氮减少可能有助于缺氧耐受性的形成。     

NO在脊髓痛觉传递过程中的作用

一氧化氮(nitric oxide,NO)是神经元细胞内一种新型的神经递质,它参与多种生命活动,包括脊髓水平的伤害性信息传递过程。研究NO在伤害性信息传递过程中的作用及其机制,有利于阐明痛觉生理和发现疼痛治疗的新手段。本文将NO在慢性痛脊髓伤害性信息传递中的作用及其机制的相关研究进展作一综述。     

一氧化氮及在脑发育中的作用

一氧化氮(NO)是一种小分子气体,是生物体内第一个被证实的气体信息分子。自1988年Carthwaite首次提出在神经系统中的传导作用后,NO在神经系统中的作用越来越受到重视。NO具有脂溶性、在体内易扩散、半衰期短(只有数秒钟)等生物学特征。体内的NO是由一氧化氮合酶(NOS)以左旋精氨酸为底物催化生成。     

The Effect of Nitric Oxide on Bacteria

Nitric oxide, as well as several other oxides of nitrogen, were assayed for their antibacterial action. It is shown that nitric oxide has virtually no effect on bacteria, whereas both NaNO₃ and NaNO₂ appear to have either neutral or stimulatory effects. It is suggested that the formation of nitrous acid is mainly responsible for the quantitative as well as the qualitative changes that occur in the bacterial flora of cured meat. A pH-dependent “nitrite cycle” is presented to account for the production of nitrous acid in cured meat systems.     

一氧化氦（NO）对海洋浮游植物的作用

该文介绍海洋浮游植物内源一氧化氮（NO）的产生,NO对海洋浮游植物生长的作用,以及有关NO在海洋浮游植物环境胁迫响应中生理作用的研究现状,并对与这些问题相关的研究趋势作了分析和讨论。     

Antistress Effect of Nitric Oxide

Rat strains feature different resistances to stress. The increased production of nitric oxide (NO) in the August strain prevents the appearance of ulcerous lesions of gastric mucosa and behavioral changes induced by restraint stress. Wistar rats feature a lower level of NO production and are more sensitive to restraint stress compared to the August rats according to both the ulcerous gastric lesions and behavioral parameters. The stress-induced release of catecholamines was mimicked by experimental hyperfunction of the dopaminergic (DA) system induced by L-DOPA. The NO synthase inhibitor N-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA) enhanced the L-DOPA-induced behavioral changes. This effect was more pronounced in the August strain. The administration of the exogenous NO donor, dinitrosyl iron complexes (DNIC), limited the behavioral disturbances induced by L-DOPA in both rat strains. The protective effect of DNIC in conditions of the DA system hyperfunction is similar to the effect of a D₂blocker sulpiride. Thus, NO has a central antistress effect apparently mediated by limiting the release of catecholamines.     

Effect of Nitric Oxide on Anammox Bacteria

The effects of nitrogen oxides on anammox bacteria are not well known. Therefore, anammox bacteria were exposed to 3,500 ppm nitric oxide (NO) in the gas phase. The anammox bacteria were not inhibited by the high NO concentration but rather used it to oxidize additional ammonium to dinitrogen gas under conditions relevant to wastewater treatment.Nitric oxide (NO) has several different roles in bacteria, fungi, and mammals (24). In nitrogen cycle bacteria, it acts as an intermediate and cell communication/signal transduction molecule. On the other hand, NO is a highly reactive and toxic compound that contributes to ozone depletion and air pollution (5). Due to its reactive nature, many bacteria employ an arsenal of proteins (those encoded by norVW, as well as bacterial globins, heme proteins, etc.) that are used to detoxify NO to the less-reactive and more-stable nitrous oxide (N₂O) (24). Still, N₂O is a very effective greenhouse gas and an unfavorable constituent in the off-gases from nitrification/denitrification nitrogen removal systems (4). The presence of gene(s) encoding cytochrome cd₁ nitrite reductase (EMBL accession no. {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"CAJ74898","term_id":"91201838","term_text":"CAJ74898"}}CAJ74898), flavorubredoxin NorVW (accession no. {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"CAJ73918","term_id":"91200863","term_text":"CAJ73918"}}CAJ73918 and {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"CAJ73688","term_id":"91200638","term_text":"CAJ73688"}}CAJ73688), and bacterial hemoglobin (accession no. {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"CAJ72702","term_id":"91203063","term_text":"CAJ72702"}}CAJ72702) in the genome of Kuenenia stuttgartiensis led to the proposal that NO also plays this dual role (metabolic versus toxic) in anammox bacteria (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) (10, 20). This has ramifications for both application and metabolism of anammox bacteria. The source of NO in an anammox reactor could be the activity of other community members (ammonium-oxidizing or denitrifying bacteria) or high concentrations of nitrite in the influent wastewater stream. Full-scale anammox reactors typically contain a significant population of ammonium-oxidizing bacteria (AOB). In the single nitritation-anammox reactors, these carry out the conversion of 50% of the ammonium in the wastewater to nitrite (6). It has been shown that AOB may produce significant amounts of NO (2, 7), and recently it was reported that NO and N₂O could be emitted from these reactors up to 0.005 and 1.2% of the total nitrogen load to the reactor, respectively (6, 23). NO may inhibit the anammox bacteria and could also be further reduced to N₂O in these reactors (6, 23). It is presently unknown whether anammox bacteria contribute to the NO or N₂O emissions, although it has been suggested previously that anammox bacteria do not produce N₂O under physiologically relevant conditions (10). Nevertheless, if conversion of NO could be coupled to anaerobic ammonium oxidation, the toxic air pollutant NO would facilitate further removal of ammonium in full-scale anammox bioreactors. In the present study, we investigated the effect of very high NO fluxes on anammox bacteria.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.The hypothetical anammox pathway with possible routes of NO removal. Solid black arrows: anammox pathway, including nitrite oxidation to nitrate; gray arrow, possible detoxification pathway to N₂O (not observed in the bioreactor); dashed gray arrow, NO oxidation to nitrite/nitrate (not possible under anoxic conditions).NO has been described many times as a potent inhibitor of nitrogen cycle bacteria; aerobic ammonium oxidizers, nitrite oxidizers, and denitrifiers were all inhibited by concentrations as low as a few micromolar units (1, 18, 24). In a previous study, it was suggested that “Candidatus Brocadia anammoxidans” could tolerate up to 600 ppm NO (approximately 1 mg NO·day⁻¹ NO load) (16). In the reported experiments, without direct measurement of nitrous oxide (N₂O) in the effluent gas stream, it was postulated that NO was reduced to N₂O (16). In the present study, we used a carefully monitored sequencing batch reactor (SBR) to further our understanding of the effect and fate of NO in a laboratory-scale anammox reactor under conditions which are relevant in wastewater treatment plants.An SBR (working volume, 3.5 liters) consisting of approximately 80% of the anammox bacterium “Candidatus Brocadia fulgida” and no detectable aerobic ammonium oxidizers (determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as described previously [15]) was used in the present study. Before the first introduction of NO into the reactor, the influent (synthetic wastewater) (21) was supplied to the reactor at a flow rate of 1.4 ml·min⁻¹ with nitrite and ammonium concentrations (assayed as previously described [9]) at 45 and 39 mM, respectively (corresponding to a total of 2,370 mg N·day⁻¹). All nitrite was consumed in the reactor, while 2 mM ammonium was still present in the effluent. For every 1 mol of ammonium, 1.22 mol of nitrite was consumed, similar to the previously determined anammox stoichiometry (19). NO was first introduced at a concentration of 400 to 600 ppm in the gas phase at a flow rate of 10 ml/min (CLD 700EL chemiluminescence NOx analyzer, detection limit of 0.1 ppm NO, with 15 ml/min Ar/CO₂ as the dilution gas [a load of 25 to 28 mg NO·day⁻¹]; EcoPhysics, Michigan). During this period, 45% (±6%) of the supplied NO was removed from the system. Initially, there was no detectable change in the ammonium and nitrite removal efficiencies and no detectable nitrous oxide (N₂O) in the flue gas (analyzed with an Agilent 6890 gas chromatograph). It is most likely that NO was converted to N₂, but the increase in the N₂ concentrations in the off-gas was below the detection limit (1,000 ppm).At day 49, the influent NO concentration was increased to 3,500 ppm (640 mg NO·day⁻¹ load). Simultaneously, the stirring speed of the reactor was increased from 200 to 600 rpm to enable better mass transfer to the flocculent anammox biomass. The increase in the stirring speed did not result in any disturbance in the floc size and settling ability of the biomass but did lead to a much higher level of NO removal (128 mg NO·day⁻¹) by the anammox bacteria. The converted NO could theoretically be converted to N₂O via detoxification enzymes or coupled to ammonium oxidation (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). Surprisingly, there was no change in the nitrite removal capacity of the bioreactor, suggesting that NO was not a substrate preferred over nitrite. Nitrate concentrations (assayed according to the method in reference 9) were stable around 7.2 mM (±0.7 mM). Theoretically, as anammox bacteria reduce NO, they could oxidize a larger proportion of nitrite to nitrate (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) to increase their capacity for CO₂ fixation; however, such an increase in nitrate production was not observed (or could not be discriminated by the method used [sensitivity, 100 μM]). During this phase of the experiment, the effluent ammonium concentration gradually decreased to below the detection limit (Fig. ​(Fig.2).2). There was only a minimal N₂O (0.6 ppm) emission from the system, and the total N₂ production increased from 3,060 to 3,680 mg N₂·day⁻¹. This indicated that NO reduction was coupled to the catabolism of the anammox bacteria rather than being detoxified by anammox or other community members. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first time that such a high load of NO was not found to be toxic to the nitrogen cycle bacteria. In a previous study, an NO load of 1 mg NO·day⁻¹ was reported to be toxic to anammox bacteria, most probably due to the fact that the experiments were conducted with biomass that had a 100-fold lower cell density and 10-fold lower activity compared to the current enrichment cultures. Furthermore, the NO conversion in the current experiments was stoichiometrically coupled to ammonium oxidation and not converted to N₂O, indicating that the previously reported N₂O emissions from full-scale anammox bioreactors originated not with the anammox bacteria but rather with other community members as hypothesized previously (8).Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.Ammonium concentration in the effluent of the anammox bioreactor. Dashed lines indicate the trend of effluent ammonium concentration during different phases of the reactor operation. Black arrows indicate the manipulations to influent NO stream, and the gray arrow points to an increase in the influent ammonium concentration. d, day.To determine if there could be more NO-dependent ammonium removal, the influent ammonium concentration was first increased to 41 mM (day 80) and then to 43 mM (day 81). This resulted in a slow but gradual increase in the effluent ammonium concentration, and additional ammonium did not appear to be completely converted, most probably due to NO mass transfer limitations. As a result of the higher level of ammonium removal, the observed anammox stoichiometry in the reactor decreased from 1.22 to 0.91 (nitrite/ammonium). Between days 95 and 131, the NO supply to the reactor was turned off, which resulted in an average ammonium concentration of 3.3 mM (±0.9 mM) in the effluent. Following this period, on day 132, the NO load on the reactor was increased back to 640 mg NO·day⁻¹ (Fig. ​(Fig.2).2). As a result, the effluent ammonium concentration gradually decreased again to an average of 1.5 mM (±0.36 mM). The highest level of NO removal achieved in this period was 371 mg NO·day⁻¹. When the NO supply was turned off on day 165, ammonium concentrations increased back to 3.5 mM (±0.71 mM).During the course of the experiment, the biodiversity of the reactor was monitored using FISH and 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis as described previously (15) with probes specific to eubacteria (3), Planctomycetes (13), anammox bacteria (15), “Ca. Brocadia fulgida” (11), and a variety of aerobic ammonium-oxidizing bacteria (12, 22). Before the experiments started and throughout the cultivation of the anammox bacteria with NO, the only detectable anammox species (with FISH and 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis) was “Candidatus Brocadia fulgida.”In the present study, we showed that 2 mM ammonium (4.5% of the influent concentration) could be removed by anammox bacteria via direct coupling to NO reduction. These observations support the proposal of NO as an intermediate of the anammox reaction and have two consequences for application of the anammox process for nitrogen removal. First, we obtained strong indications that previously reported N₂O emissions (6, 8) from full-scale anammox reactors were not generated by anammox bacteria. In our experiments, even under a very high load of NO, there was hardly any detectable N₂O in the effluent gas stream. The competition for nitrogen oxides by denitrifying and anammox bacteria needs further study but may ultimately be used to design operational conditions that would reduce or even prevent NO and N₂O emissions from full-scale nitritation-anammox reactors. Second, by implementing the results of this study, in the future the anammox process could be designed to remove NO from flue gases. Since NO is mostly emitted together with O₂, this could be achieved by the combination of anammox and aerobic ammonium-oxidizing bacteria, for example, with CANON (completely autotrophic nitrogen removal over nitrite)- or OLAND (oxygen-limited autotrophic nitrification-denitrification)-type reactor systems (14, 17).     

The Effect of Cauda Equina Constriction on Nitric Oxide Synthase Activity

Nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity was studied in the gray and white matter regions of the spinal cord 2 and 5 days after multiple cauda equina constrictions of the central processes of L7-Co5 dorsal root ganglia neurons. The results show considerable differences in enzyme activity in the thoracic, upper lumbar, lower lumbar, and sacral segments. Increased NOS activity was observed at 2 days after multiple cauda equina constrictions in the dorsal, lateral, and ventral columns of the lower lumbar segments and in the ventral column of the upper lumbar segments. The values returned to control levels within 5 postconstriction days. In the lateral columns of thoracic segments taken 2 and 5 days after surgery, NOS activity was enhanced by 54% and 55% and in the upper lumbar segments by 130% and 163%, respectively. Multiple cauda equina constrictions performed surgically for 2 and 5 days caused a significant increase in NOS activity predominantly in the gray matter regions of thoracic segments. A quite different response was found 5 days postconstriction in the upper lumbar segments, where the enzyme activity was significantly decreased in the dorsal horn, intermediate zone, and ventral horn. No such extreme differences could be seen in the lower lumbar segments, where NOS activity was significantly enhanced only in the ventral horn. The data correspond with a higher number of NOS immunoreactive somata, quantitatively evaluated in the ventral horn of the lower lumbar segments at 5 days after multiple cauda equina constrictions. While the great region-dependent heterogeneity in NOS activity seen 2 and 5 days after multiple cauda equina constrictions is quite apparent and suggestive of an active role played by nitric oxide in neuroprotective or neurotoxic processes occurring in the gray and white matter of the spinal cord, the extent of damage or the degree of neuroprotection caused by nitric oxide in compartmentalized gray and white matter in this experimental paradigm would be possible only using longer postconstriction periods.     

软体动物的一氧化氮及其合酶的研究进展

一氧化氮作为一种重要的信息分子,参与调节软体动物的嗅觉、运动、取食、机体防御及学习行为。本文从生理、生化、形态定位以及信号转导几方面综述了有关软体动物一氧化氮及其合酶的最新研究进展。     

The Effect of Air Pollution on Exhaled Nitric Oxide of Atopic and Nonatopic Subjects

Levels of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) were determined in well-characterized atopic and nonatopic subjects on 4 days with a different level of outdoor air pollution. The two groups matched well regarding spirometric values, i.e., no difference with regard to FEV(1), FVC, and peak flow. On the 4 test days asymptomatic atopic subjects exhaled 1.5- to 2.4-fold higher levels of NO compared with nonatopic subjects. In both groups the increase in exhaled NO in response to air pollution was similar (2.5 times maximal increase, P < 0.01). In conclusion, atopic subjects exhale higher levels of NO compared with nonatopic subjects, but respond to a similar degree to increased levels of air pollution.