Force-induced bidirectional stepping of cytoplasmic dynein

Cytoplasmic dynein is a minus-end-directed microtubule motor whose mechanism of movement remains poorly understood. Here, we use optical tweezers to examine the force-dependent stepping behavior of yeast cytoplasmic dynein. We find that dynein primarily advances in 8 nm increments but takes other sized steps (4-24 nm) as well. An opposing force induces more frequent backward stepping by dynein, and the motor walks backward toward the microtubule plus end at loads above its stall force of 7 pN. Remarkably, in the absence of ATP, dynein steps processively along microtubules under an external load, with less force required for minus-end- than for plus-end-directed movement. This nucleotide-independent walking reveals that force alone can drive repetitive microtubule detachment-attachment cycles of dynein's motor domains. These results suggest a model for how dynein's two motor domains coordinate their activities during normal processive motility and provide new clues for understanding dynein-based motility in living cells.     

A single protofilament is sufficient to support unidirectional walking of Dynein and Kinesin

Cytoplasmic dynein and kinesin are two-headed microtubule motor proteins that move in opposite directions on microtubules. It is known that kinesin steps by a 'hand-over-hand' mechanism, but it is unclear by which mechanism dynein steps. Because dynein has a completely different structure from that of kinesin and its head is massive, it is suspected that dynein uses multiple protofilaments of microtubules for walking. One way to test this is to ask whether dynein can step along a single protofilament. Here, we examined dynein and kinesin motility on zinc-induced tubulin sheets (zinc-sheets) which have only one protofilament available as a track for motor proteins. Single molecules of both dynein and kinesin moved at similar velocities on zinc-sheets compared to microtubules, clearly demonstrating that dynein and kinesin can walk on a single protofilament and multiple rows of parallel protofilaments are not essential for their motility. Considering the size and the motile properties of dynein, we suggest that dynein may step by an inchworm mechanism rather than a hand-over-hand mechanism.     

How Cytoplasmic Dynein Couples ATP Hydrolysis Cycle to Diverse Stepping Motions: Kinetic Modeling

Cytoplasmic dynein is a two-headed molecular motor that moves to the minus end of a microtubule by ATP hydrolysis free energy. By employing its two heads (motor domains), cytoplasmic dynein exhibits various bipedal stepping motions: inchworm and hand-over-hand motions, as well as nonalternating steps of one head. However, the molecular basis to achieve such diverse stepping manners remains unclear because of the lack of an experimental method to observe stepping and the ATPase reaction of dynein simultaneously. Here, we propose a kinetic model for bipedal motions of cytoplasmic dynein and perform Gillespie Monte Carlo simulations that qualitatively reproduce most experimental data obtained to date. The model represents the status of each motor domain as five states according to conformation and nucleotide- and microtubule-binding conditions of the domain. In addition, the relative positions of the two domains were approximated by three discrete states. Accompanied by ATP hydrolysis cycles, the model dynein stochastically and processively moved forward in multiple steps via diverse pathways, including inchworm and hand-over-hand motions, similarly to experimental data. The model reproduced key experimental motility-related properties, including velocity and run length, as functions of the ATP concentration and external force, therefore providing a plausible explanation of how dynein achieves various stepping manners with explicit characterization of nucleotide states. Our model highlights the uniqueness of dynein in the coupling of ATPase with its movement during both inchworm and hand-over-hand stepping.     

The Winch Model Can Explain both Coordinated and Uncoordinated Stepping of Cytoplasmic Dynein

Cytoplasmic dynein moves processively along microtubules, but the mechanism of how its heads use the energy from ATP hydrolysis, coupled to a linker swing, to achieve directed motion, is still unclear. In this article, we present a theoretical model based on the winch mechanism in which the principal direction of the linker stroke is toward the microtubule-binding domain. When mechanically coupling two identical heads (each with postulated elastic properties and a minimal ATPase cycle), the model reproduces stepping with 8-nm steps (even though the motor itself is much larger), interhead coordination, and processivity, as reported for mammalian dyneins. Furthermore, when we loosen the elastic connection between the heads, the model still shows processive directional stepping, but it becomes uncoordinated and the stepping pattern shows a greater variability, which reproduces the properties of yeast dyneins. Their slower chemical kinetics allows processive motility and a high stall force without the need for coordination.     

Evidence for cooperative interactions between the two motor domains of cytoplasmic dynein.

Cytoplasmic dynein is a force-transducing ATPase that powers the movement of cellular cargoes along microtubules. Two identical heavy chain polypeptides (> 500 kDa) of the cytoplasmic dynein complex contain motor domains that possess the ATPase and microtubule-binding activities required for force production [1]. It is of great interest to determine whether both heavy chains (DHCs) in the dynein complex are required for progression of the mechanochemical cycle and motility, as observed for other dimeric motors. We have used transgenic constructs to investigate cooperative interactions between the two motor domains of the Drosophila cytoplasmic dynein complex. We show that 138 kDa and 180 kDa amino-terminal fragments of DHC can assemble with full-length DHC to form heterodimeric complexes containing only a single motor domain. The single-headed dynein complexes can bind and hydrolyze ATP, yet do not show the ATP-induced detachment from microtubules that is characteristic of wild-type homodimeric dynein. These results suggest that cooperative interactions between the monomeric units of the dimer are required for efficient ATP-induced detachment of dynein and unidirectional movement along the microtubule.     

The Winch Model Can Explain both Coordinated and Uncoordinated Stepping of Cytoplasmic Dynein

Cytoplasmic dynein moves processively along microtubules, but the mechanism of how its heads use the energy from ATP hydrolysis, coupled to a linker swing, to achieve directed motion, is still unclear. In this article, we present a theoretical model based on the winch mechanism in which the principal direction of the linker stroke is toward the microtubule-binding domain. When mechanically coupling two identical heads (each with postulated elastic properties and a minimal ATPase cycle), the model reproduces stepping with 8-nm steps (even though the motor itself is much larger), interhead coordination, and processivity, as reported for mammalian dyneins. Furthermore, when we loosen the elastic connection between the heads, the model still shows processive directional stepping, but it becomes uncoordinated and the stepping pattern shows a greater variability, which reproduces the properties of yeast dyneins. Their slower chemical kinetics allows processive motility and a high stall force without the need for coordination.     

Two activators of microtubule-based vesicle transport

Cytoplasmic dynein purified by nucleotide dependent microtubule affinity has significant minus end-directed vesicle motor activity that decreases with each further purification step. Highly purified dynein causes membrane vesicles to bind but not move on microtubules. We exploited these observations to develop an assay for factors that, in combination with dynein, would permit minus end-directed vesicle motility. At each step of the purification, non-dynein fractions were recombined with dynein and assayed for vesicle motility. Two activating fractions were identified by this method. One, called Activator I, copurified with 20S dynein by velocity sedimentation but could be separated from it by ion exchange chromatography. Activator I increased only the frequency of dynein-driven vesicle movements. Activator II, sedimenting at 9S, increased both the frequency and velocity of vesicle transport and also supported plus end movements. Our results suggest that dynein-based motility is controlled at multiple levels and provide a preliminary characterization of two regulatory factors.     

Dynactin enhances the processivity of kinesin-2

Kinesin-2 is a major microtubule-based motor in most cell types. Its in vitro motile properties have been analyzed extensively and been found to differ considerably from kinesin-1. Although recombinant kinesin-2 heterodimers exhibit processive movement, the processivity of the native kinesin-2 holoenzyme has never been evaluated. Kinesin-2 can interact with dynactin, a 'processivity factor' for cytoplasmic dynein, which may alter its motile properties. In this study, we analyze the in vitro motility of single native kinesin-2 molecules and determine the effects of dynactin on motor processivity. We find that individual native kinesin-2 molecules travel processively. Dynactin has no effect on velocity but significantly increases the run length of kinesin-2 movements. These results show that the interaction with dynactin has important functional consequences on the activity of the kinesin-2 motor.     

Simultaneous observation of tail and head movements of myosin V during processive motion

Processive stepping of myosin Va (myoV) has been tracked by monitoring either the tail position (center of mass) or the position of one or both heads. Here, we combine these two approaches by attaching a quantum dot to one of the motor domains and a bead to the tail. Using laser trapping and total internal reflection microscopy, the position of one head and the tail are observed simultaneously as myoV moves processively on an actin filament bundle against the resistive load of the laser trap. The head moves one step (73 ± 10 nm) for every two steps of the tail (35 ± 9 nm). One tail step occurs concurrently with quantum dot-labeled head movement, whereas the other occurs with movement of the unlabeled head, consistent with a hand-over-hand model. Load increases the probability of the motor taking a back step. The back step is triggered by the motor taking a shorter forward step (head step, 68 ± 11 nm; tail step, 32 ± 10 nm), likely one actin monomer short of its preferred binding site. During a back step, the motor reverses its hand-over-hand motion, with the leading head detaching and reattaching to one of multiple actin sites behind the trailing head. After a back step, the motor can correct its mistake and step processively forward at resistive loads <0.7 piconewton or stall or detach at higher loads. Back stepping may provide a mechanism to ensure efficient cargo delivery even when myoV encounters obstacles within the actin cytoskeletal meshwork or when other motors are attached to the same cargo.     

Navigation Strategies of Motor Proteins on Decorated Tracks

Motor proteins display widely different stepping patterns as they move on microtubule tracks, from the deterministic linear or helical motion performed by the protein kinesin to the uncoordinated random steps made by dynein. How these different strategies produce an efficient navigation system needed to ensure correct cellular functioning is still unclear. Here, we show by numerical simulations that deterministic and random motor steps yield different outcomes when random obstacles decorate the microtubule tracks: kinesin moves faster on clean tracks but its motion is strongly hindered on decorated tracks, while dynein is slower on clean tracks but more efficient in avoiding obstacles. Further simulations indicate that dynein’s advantage on decorated tracks is due to its ability to step backwards. Our results explain how different navigation strategies are employed by the cell to optimize motor driven cargo transport.     

Cell cycle regulation of dynein association with membranes modulates microtubule-based organelle transport

Cytoplasmic dynein is a minus end-directed microtubule motor that performs distinct functions in interphase and mitosis. In interphase, dynein transports organelles along microtubules, whereas in metaphase this motor has been implicated in mitotic spindle formation and orientation as well as chromosome segregation. The manner in which dynein activity is regulated during the cell cycle, however, has not been resolved. In this study, we have examined the mechanism by which organelle transport is controlled by the cell cycle in extracts of Xenopus laevis eggs. Here, we show that photocleavage of the dynein heavy chain dramatically inhibits minus end-directed organelle transport and that purified dynein restores this motility, indicating that dynein is the predominant minus end-directed membrane motor in Xenopus egg extracts. By measuring the amount of dynein associated with isolated membranes, we find that cytoplasmic dynein and its activator dynactin detach from the membrane surface in metaphase extracts. The sevenfold decrease in membrane-associated dynein correlated well with the eightfold reduction in minus end-directed membrane transport observed in metaphase versus interphase extracts. Although dynein heavy or intermediate chain phosphorylation did not change in a cell cycle- dependent manner, the dynein light intermediate chain incorporated approximately 12-fold more radiolabeled phosphate in metaphase than in interphase extracts. These studies suggest that cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation of cytoplasmic dynein may regulate organelle transport by modulating the association of this motor with membranes.     

Kinetic characterization of tail swing steps in the ATPase cycle of Dictyostelium cytoplasmic dynein

According to the power stroke model of dynein deduced from electron microscopic and fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies, the power stroke and the recovery stroke are expected to take place at the two isomerization steps of the ATPase cycle at the primary ATPase site. Here, we have conducted presteady-state kinetic analyses of these two isomerization steps with the single-headed motor domain of Dictyostelium cytoplasmic dynein by employing fluorescence resonance energy transfer to probe ATPase steps at the primary site and tail positions. Our results show that the recovery stroke at the first isomerization step proceeds quickly ( approximately 180 s(-1)), whereas the power stroke at the second isomerization step is very slow ( approximately 0.2 s(-1)) in the absence of microtubules, and that the presence of microtubules accelerates the second but not the first step. Moreover, a comparison of the microtubule-induced acceleration of the power stroke step and that of steady-state ATP hydrolysis implies the intriguing possibility that microtubules simultaneously accelerate the ATPase activity not only at the primary site but also at other site(s) in the motor domain.     

Myosin VI steps via a hand-over-hand mechanism with its lever arm undergoing fluctuations when attached to actin

Myosin VI is a reverse direction myosin motor that, as a dimer, moves processively on actin with an average center-of-mass movement of approximately 30 nm for each step. We labeled myosin VI with a single fluorophore on either its motor domain or on the distal of two calmodulins (CaMs) located on its putative lever arm. Using a technique called FIONA (fluorescence imaging with one nanometer accuracy), step size was observed with a standard deviation of <1.5 nm, with 0.5-s temporal resolution, and observation times of minutes. Irrespective of probe position, the average step size of a labeled head was approximately 60 nm, strongly supporting a hand-over-hand model of motility and ruling out models in which the unique myosin VI insert comes apart. However, the CaM probe displayed large spatial fluctuations (presence of ATP but not ADP or no nucleotide) around the mean position, whereas the motor domain probe did not. This supports a model of myosin VI motility in which the lever arm is either mechanically uncoupled from the motor domain or is undergoing reversible isomerization for part of its motile cycle on actin.     

Golgin160 recruits the dynein motor to position the Golgi apparatus

Membrane motility is a fundamental characteristic of all eukaryotic cells. One of the best-known examples is that of the mammalian Golgi apparatus, where constant inward movement of Golgi membranes results in its characteristic position near the centrosome. While it is clear that the minus-end-directed motor dynein is required for this process, the mechanism and regulation of dynein recruitment to Golgi membranes remains unknown. Here, we show that the Golgi protein golgin160 recruits dynein to Golgi membranes. This recruitment confers centripetal motility to membranes and is regulated by the GTPase Arf1. Further, during cell division, motor association with membranes is regulated by the dissociation of the receptor-motor complex from membranes. These results identify a cell-cycle-regulated membrane receptor for a molecular motor and?suggest a mechanistic basis for achieving the dramatic changes in organelle positioning seen during cell division.     

Head-head coordination is required for the processive motion of cytoplasmic dynein, an AAA+ molecular motor

Cytoplasmic dynein is an AAA(+)-type molecular motor whose major components are two identical heavy chains containing six AAA(+) modules in tandem. It moves along a single microtubule in multiple steps which are accompanied with multiple ATP hydrolysis. This processive sliding is crucial for cargo transports in vivo. To examine how cytoplasmic dynein exhibits this processivity, we performed in vitro motility assays of two-headed full-length or truncated single-headed heavy chains. The results indicated that four to five molecules of the single-headed heavy chain were required for continuous microtubule sliding, while approximately one molecule of the two-headed full-length heavy chain was enough for the continuous sliding. The ratio of the stroking time to the total ATPase cycle time, which is a quantitative indicator of the processivity, was approximately 0.2 for the single-headed heavy chain, while it was approximately 0.6 for the full-length molecule. When two single-headed heavy chains were artificially linked by a coiled-coil of myosin, the processivity was restored. These results suggest that the two heads of a single cytoplasmic dynein communicate with each other to take processive steps along a microtubule.     

Single-molecule observations of neck linker conformational changes in the kinesin motor protein

Kinesin-1 is a dimeric motor protein that moves cargo processively along microtubules. Kinesin motility has been proposed to be driven by the coordinated forward extension of the neck linker (a approximately 12-residue peptide) in one motor domain and the rearward positioning of the neck linker in the partner motor domain. To test this model, we have introduced fluorescent dyes selectively into one subunit of the kinesin dimer and performed 'half-molecule' fluorescence resonance energy transfer to measure conformational changes of the neck linker. We show that when kinesin binds with both heads to the microtubule, the neck linkers in the rear and forward heads extend forward and backward, respectively. During ATP-driven motility, the neck linkers switch between these conformational states. These results support the notion that neck linker movements accompany the 'hand-over-hand' motion of the two motor domains.     

Dynactin increases the processivity of the cytoplasmic dynein motor

Cytoplasmic dynein supports long-range intracellular movements of cargo in vivo but does not appear to be a processive motor protein by itself. We show here that the dynein activator, dynactin, binds microtubules and increases the average length of cytoplasmic-dynein-driven movements without affecting the velocity or microtubule-stimulated ATPase kinetics of cytoplasmic dynein. Enhancement of microtubule binding and motility by dynactin are both inhibited by an antibody to dynactin's microtubule-binding domain. These results indicate that dynactin acts as a processivity factor for cytoplasmic-dynein-based motility and provide the first evidence that cytoskeletal motor processivity can be affected by extrinsic factors.     

Distinct cytoplasmic dynein complexes are transported by different mechanisms in axons

In neurons, cytoplasmic dynein is synthesized in the cell body, but its function is to move cargo from the axon back to the cell body. Dynein must therefore be delivered to the axon and its motor activity must be regulated during axonal transport. Cytoplasmic dynein is a large protein complex composed of a number of different subunits. The dynein heavy chains contain the motor domains and the intermediate chains are involved in binding the complex to cargo. Five different intermediate chain polypeptides, which are the result of the alternative splicing of the two intermediate chain genes, have been identified. We have characterized two distinct pools of dynein that are transported from the cell body along the axon by different mechanisms. One pool, which contains the ubiquitous intermediate chain, is associated with the membranous organelles transported by kinesin in the fast transport component. The other pool, which contains the other developmentally regulated intermediate chains, is transported in slow component b. The mechanism of dynein regulation will therefore depend on which pool of dynein is recruited to function as the retrograde motor. In addition, the properties of the large pool of dynein associated with actin in slow component b are consistent with the hypothesis that this dynein may be the motor for microtubule transport in the axon.     

A flexible domain is essential for the large step size and processivity of myosin VI

Myosin VI moves processively along actin with a larger step size than expected from the size of the motor. Here, we show that the proximal tail (the approximately 80-residue segment following the IQ domain) is not a rigid structure but, rather, a flexible domain that permits the heads to separate. With a GCN4 coiled coil inserted in the proximal tail, the heads are closer together in electron microscopy (EM) images, and the motor takes shorter processive steps. Single-headed myosin VI S1 constructs take nonprocessive 12 nm steps, suggesting that most of the processive step is covered by a diffusive search for an actin binding site. Based on these results, we present a mechanical model that describes stepping under an applied load.     

A unique mechanism for the processive movement of single-headed myosin-IX

It has been puzzled that in spite of its single-headed structure, myosin-IX shows the typical character of processive motor in multi-molecule in vitro motility assay, because this cannot be explained by hand-over-hand mechanism of the two-headed processive myosins. Here, we show direct evidence of the processive movement of myosin-IX using two different single molecule techniques. Using optical trap nanometry, we found that myosin-IX takes several large ( approximately 20nm) steps before detaching from an actin filament. Furthermore, we directly visualized the single myosin-IX molecules moving on actin filaments for several hundred nanometers without dissociating from actin filament. Since myosin-IX processively moves without anchoring the neck domain, the result suggests that the neck tilting is not involved for the processive movement of myosin-IX. We propose that the myosin-IX head moves processively along an actin filament like an inchworm via a unique long and positively charged insertion in the loop 2 region of the head.