Abnormal behavior of the yolk centrosomes during early embryogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster

After the 10th nuclear cycle the yolk centrosomes follow an irregular pathway. Unlike the somatic centrosomes, which move to the opposite poles of the nuclei to form the bipolar spindles, the yolk centrosomes remain as pairs at one pole of the yolk nuclei or shift feebly and nucleate irregular spindles, most of which have only one main pole. The yolk centrosomes are no longer observed near the yolk nuclei, but progressively move away into the surrounding cytoplasm. Despite the irregular behavior of the centrosomes and although the yolk nuclei cease to divide, the yolk centrosome duplication cycle continues. The early development of Drosophila thus provides an excellent natural system for the study of the uncoupling of the nuclear and centrosomal cycles.     

Live analysis of free centrosomes in normal and aphidicolin-treated Drosophila embryos

In a number of embryonic systems, centrosomes that have lost their association with the nuclear envelope and spindle maintain their ability to duplicate and induce astral microtubules. To identify additional activities of free centrosomes, we monitored astral microtubule dynamics by injecting living syncytial Drosophila embryos with fluorescently labeled tubulin. Our recordings follow multiple rounds of free centrosome duplication and separation during the cortical division. The rate and distance of free sister centrosome separation corresponds well with the initial phase of associated centrosome separation. However, the later phase of separation observed for centrosomes associated with a spindle (anaphase B) does not occur. Free centrosome separation regularly occurs on a plane parallel to the plasma membrane. While previous work demonstrated that centrosomes influence cytoskeletal dynamics, this observation suggests that the cortical cytoskeleton regulates the orientation of centrosome separation. Although free centrosomes do not form spindles, they display relatively normal cell cycle-dependent modulations of their astral microtubules. In addition, free centrosome duplication, separation, and modulation of microtubule dynamics often occur in synchrony with neighboring associated centrosomes. These observations suggest that free centrosomes respond normally to local nuclear division signals. Disruption of the cortical nuclear divisions with aphidicolin supports this conclusion; large numbers of abnormal nuclei recede into the interior while their centrosomes remain on the cortex. Following individual free centrosomes through multiple focal planes for 45 min after the injection of aphidicolin reveals that they do not undergo normal modulation of their astral dynamics nor do they undergo multiple rounds of duplication and separation. We conclude that in the absence of normally dividing cortical nuclei many centrosome activities are disrupted and centrosome duplication is extensively delayed. This indicates the presence of a feedback mechanism that creates a dependency relationship between the cortical nuclear cycles and the centrosome cycles.     

daughterless-abo-like, a Drosophila maternal-effect mutation that exhibits abnormal centrosome separation during the late blastoderm divisions

daughterless-abo-like (dal) is a maternal-effect semilethal mutation in Drosophila. The nuclear divisions of embryos derived from homozygous dal females are normal through nuclear cycle 10. However, during nuclear cycles 11, 12 and 13, a total of about half of the nuclei in each embryo either fail to divide or fuse with a neighboring nucleus during telophase. These abnormal nuclei eventually sink into the interior of the embryo, leaving their centrosomes behind on the surface. The loss of about one-half of the peripheral nuclei into the interior of the embryo results in these embryos cellularizing during nuclear cycle 14 with about one-half the normal number of cells. Surprisingly, many of these embryos develop a nearly normal larval cuticle and 8% develop to adulthood. Observations of live embryos doubly injected with tubulin and histones that have been fluorescently labeled allows nuclear and centrosomal behavior to be directly followed as the embryo develops. We find that the abnormal nuclei arise from nuclei whose centrosomes have failed to separate normally in the previous interphase. These incompletely separated centrosomes can cause a non-functional spindle to form, leading to a nuclear division failure. Alternatively, they can form an abnormal spindle with a centrosome from a neighboring nucleus, causing two nuclei to share a common spindle pole. Such nuclei with a shared centrosome will undergo telophase fusions, unequal divisions, or division failures later in mitosis. These findings have helped us to understand the function of the centrosome in the Drosophila embryo.     

HOPS is an essential constituent of centrosome assembly

Centrosomes direct microtubule organization during cell division. Aberrant number of centrosomes results from alteration of its components and leads to abnormal mitoses and chromosome instability. HOPS is a newly discovered protein isolated during liver regeneration, implicated in cell proliferation. Here, we provide evidence that HOPS is an integral constituent of centrosomes. HOPS is associated with classical markers of centrosomes and found in cytosolic complexes containing CRM-1, γ-tubulin, eEF-1A and HSP70. These features suggest that HOPS is involved in centrosome assembly and maintenance. HOPS depletion generates supernumerary centrosomes, multinucleated cells and multipolar spindle formation leading to activation of p53 checkpoint and cell cycle arrest. The presence of HOPS in cytosolic complexes supports that centrosome proteins might be preassembled in the cytoplasm to then be rapidly recruited for centrosome duplication. Altogether these data show HOPS implication in the control of cell division. HOPS contribution appears relevant to understand genomic instability and centrosome amplification in cancer.     

The centrosome in normal and transformed cells

The centrosome is a unique organelle that functions as the microtubule organizing center in most animal cells. During cell division, the centrosomes form the poles of the bipolar mitotic spindle. In addition, the centrosomes are also needed for cytokinesis. Each mammalian somatic cell typically contains one centrosome, which is duplicated in coordination with DNA replication. Just like the chromosomes, the centrosome is precisely reproduced once and only once during each cell cycle. However, it remains a mystery how this protein-based structure undergoes accurate duplication in a semiconservative manner. Intriguingly, amplification of the centrosome has been found in numerous forms of cancers. Cells with multiple centrosomes tend to form multipolar spindles, which result in abnormal chromosome segregation during mitosis. It has therefore been postulated that centrosome aberration may compromise the fidelity of cell division and cause chromosome instability. Here we review the current understanding of how the centrosome is assembled and duplicated. We also discuss the possible mechanisms by which centrosome abnormality contributes to the development of malignant phenotype.     

Temporal and spatial control of nucleophosmin by the Ran-Crm1 complex in centrosome duplication

Centrosome duplication is tightly controlled during faithful cell division, and unnecessary reduplication can lead to supernumerary centrosomes and multipolar spindles that are associated with most human cancer cells. In addition to nucleocytoplasmic transport, the Ran-Crm1 network is involved in regulating centrosome duplication to ensure the formation of a bipolar spindle. Here, we discover that nucleophosmin (NPM) may be a Ran-Crm1 substrate that controls centrosome duplication. NPM contains a functional nuclear export signal (NES) that is responsible for both its nucleocytoplasmic shuttling and its association with centrosomes, which are Ran-Crm1-dependent as they are sensitive to Crm1-specific nuclear export inhibition, either by leptomycin B (LMB) or by the expression of a Ran-binding protein, RanBP1. Notably, LMB treatment induces premature centrosome duplication in quiescent cells, which coincides with NPM dissociation from centrosomes. Moreover, deficiency of NPM by RNA interference results in supernumerary centrosomes, which can be reversed by reintroducing wild-type but not NES-mutated NPM. Mutation of a potential proline-dependent kinase phosphorylation site at residue 95, from threonine to aspartic acid (T95D) within the NES motif, abolishes NPM association and inhibition of centrosome duplication. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that the Ran-Crm1 complex may promote a local enrichment of NPM on centrosomes, thereby preventing centrosome reduplication.     

IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY OF FERTILIZATION AND PARTHENOGENESIS IN LAMINARIA ANGUSTATA (PHAEOPHYTA)1

Normal fertilization and parthenogenesis of unfertilized eggs were observed in Laminaria angustata Kjellman by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy using a tubulin antibody. Sperm aster formation did not occur at plasmogamy. The centrosome of the egg gradually disappeared. Shortly after karyogamy, one centrosome reappeared near the zygote nucleus. During mitosis, the centrosome replicated and the daughter centrosomes migrated to opposite poles. The mitotic spindle was formed by microtubules that elongated from both poles. After the first cell division, each of the daughter cells received one centrosome that persisted throughout the development of the sporophyte. During parthenogenetic development, abnormal mono-, tri-, and multi-polar spindles were formed. These abnormal spindles caused abnormal nuclear and cytoplasmic division. Thus, cells were produced with 1) no nuclei, 2) multiple nuclei, 3) irregular numbers of chromosomes, and/or 4) no centrosomes. This is one of the reasons for the abortion and abnormal morphogenesis during parthenogenesis. Ultrastructural observations showed that, although cells of some parthogenetic sporophytes have centrioles, cells of almost all abnormally shaped parthenogenetic sporophytes lack centrioles. These results suggest that centrioles are required for normal centrosomal functions in Laminaria. Although centrioles are inherited paternally, some centrosomal material appears to be present or produced de novo in unfertilized eggs.     

Spindle Assembly and Mitosis without Centrosomes in Parthenogenetic Sciara Embryos

In Sciara, unfertilized embryos initiate parthenogenetic development without centrosomes. By comparing these embryos with normal fertilized embryos, spindle assembly and other microtubule-based events can be examined in the presence and absence of centrosomes. In both cases, functional mitotic spindles are formed that successfully proceed through anaphase and telophase, forming two daughter nuclei separated by a midbody. The spindles assembled without centrosomes are anastral, and it is likely that their microtubules are nucleated at or near the chromosomes. These spindles undergo anaphase B and successfully segregate sister chromosomes. However, without centrosomes the distance between the daughter nuclei in the next interphase is greatly reduced. This suggests that centrosomes are required to maintain nuclear spacing during the telophase to interphase transition. As in Drosophila, the initial embryonic divisions of Sciara are synchronous and syncytial. The nuclei in fertilized centrosome-bearing embryos maintain an even distribution as they divide and migrate to the cortex. In contrast, as division proceeds in embryos lacking centrosomes, nuclei collide and form large irregularly shaped nuclear clusters. These nuclei are not evenly distributed and never successfully migrate to the cortex. This phenotype is probably a direct result of a failure to form astral microtubules in parthenogenetic embryos lacking centrosomes. These results indicate that the primary function of centrosomes is to provide astral microtubules for proper nuclear spacing and migration during the syncytial divisions. Fertilized Sciara embryos produce a large population of centrosomes not associated with nuclei. These free centrosomes do not form spindles or migrate to the cortex and replicate at a significantly reduced rate. This suggests that the centrosome must maintain a proper association with the nucleus for migration and normal replication to occur.     

The centrosomin protein is required for centrosome assembly and function during cleavage in Drosophila.

Centrosomin is a 150 kDa centrosomal protein of Drosophila melanogaster. To study the function of Centrosomin in the centrosome, we have recovered mutations that are viable but male and female sterile (cnnmfs). We have shown that these alleles (1, 2, 3, 7, 8 and hk21) induce a maternal effect on early embryogenesis and result in the accumulation of low or undetectable levels of Centrosomin in the centrosomes of cleavage stage embryos. Hemizygous cnn females produce embryos that show dramatic defects in chromosome segregation and spindle organization during the syncytial cleavage divisions. In these embryos the syncytial divisions proceed as far as the twelfth cycle, and embryos fail to cellularize. Aberrant divisions and nuclear fusions occur in the early cycles of the nuclear divisions, and become more prominent at later stages. Giant nuclei are seen in late stage embryos. The spindles that form in mutant embryos exhibit multiple anomalies. There is a high occurrence of apparently linked spindles that share poles, indicating that Centrosomin is required for the proper spacing and separation of mitotic spindles within the syncytium. Spindle poles in the mutants contain little or no detectable amounts of the centrosomal proteins CP60, CP190 and (gamma)-tubulin and late stage embryos often do not have astral microtubules at their spindle poles. Spindle morphology and centrosomal composition suggest that the primary cause of these division defects in mutant embryos is centrosomal malfunction. These results suggest that Centrosomin is required for the assembly and function of centrosomes during the syncytial cleavage divisions.     

The centrosome and bipolar spindle assembly: Does one have anything to do with the other?

In vertebrate somatic cells, the centrosome functions as the major microtubule-organizing center (MTOC), which splits and separates to form the poles of the mitotic spindle. However, the role of the centriole-containing centrosome in the formation of bipolar mitotic spindles continues to be controversial. Cells normally containing centrosomes are still able to build bipolar spindles after their centrioles have been removed or ablated. In naturally occurring cellular systems that lack centrioles, such as plant cells and many oocytes, bipolar spindles form in the complete absence of canonical centrosomes. These observations have led to the notion that centrosomes play no role during mitosis. However, recent work has re-examined spindle assembly in the absence of centrosomes, both in cells that naturally lack them and those that have had them experimentally removed. The results of these studies suggest that an appreciation of microtubule network organization, both before and after nuclear envelope breakdown (NEB), is the key to understanding the mechanisms that regulate spindle assembly and the generation of bipolarity.Key words: centrosome, centriole, mitosis, spindle, cell cycle, meiosis, plant cell, microsurgery     

Behaviour of centrosomes in early Tubifex embryos: asymmetric segregation and mitotic cycle-dependent duplication

An antibody raised against a highly conserved peptide of -tubulin (Joshi et al. 1992) recognized a 50 kDa polypeptide in centrosomes in Tubifex embryos. Centrosomes labelled with this antibody are found at both poles of the first meiotic spindle and at the inner pole of the second meiotic spindle. At the transition to the second meiosis, there is no change in morphology of the centrosomes which are retained in the egg proper. In contrast, as the second meiosis proceeds from anaphase to telophase, centrosomes labelled with the antibody gradually become smaller, but are still recognized as tiny dots; each egg exhibits no more than one tiny dot. The first cleavage spindles exhibit a centrosome at one pole but not at the other. The spindle pole with a centrosome forms an aster which is inherited by the larger cell, CD, of the two-cell embryo; the centrosome-free spindle pole then becomes anastral and is segregated to a smaller cell AB. Centrosomes are present in the C and D cell lineages but not in the A and B lineages, at least up to the eighth cleavage cycle. During cleavage stages, centrosomes duplicate early in telophase of each mitosis, and their size changes in a cell cycle-specific fashion. Centrosomes which otherwise duplicate asynchronously in separate cells do so synchronously in a common cytoplasm. Centrosome duplication is inhibited by nocodazole but not by cytochalasin D. An examination of embryos treated with cycloheximide or aphidicolin also suggests that centrosome duplication during cleavages requires protein synthesis but no DNA replication per se. These results suggest that the centrosome cycle in Tubifex blastomeres is linked to the mitotic cycle more closely than is that in other animals.     

Radiation-induced centrosome overduplication and multiple mitotic spindles in human tumor cells

The centrosome is a highly regulated organelle and its proper duplication is indispensable for the formation of bipolar mitotic spindles and balanced chromosome segregation. To elucidate a possible linkage between centrosome duplication and radiation-induced nuclear damage, we examined centrosome dynamics in U2-OS osteosarcoma cells following gamma-irradiation. Nearly all control cells contained one or two centrosomes, and at mitosis more than 97% of the cells displayed typical bipolar spindles. In contrast, over 20% of cells at 48 h after 10 Gy gamma-irradiation contained more than two centrosomes, and 60% of the mitotic cells showed aberrant spindles organized by multiple poles. Remarkably, the cells with multiple centrosomes frequently exhibited changes in size and/or morphology of the nucleus, including micronuclei formation. We conclude that abnormal centrosome duplication could be one of the key events involved in nuclear fragmentation and perhaps even cell death following irradiation.     

The Golgi protein GM130 regulates centrosome morphology and function

The Golgi apparatus (GA) of mammalian cells is positioned in the vicinity of the centrosome, the major microtubule organizing center of the cell. The significance of this physical proximity for organelle function and cell cycle progression is only beginning to being understood. We have identified a novel function for the GA protein, GM130, in the regulation of centrosome morphology, position and function during interphase. RNA interference-mediated depletion of GM130 from five human cell lines revealed abnormal interphase centrosomes that were mispositioned and defective with respect to microtubule organization and cell migration. When GM130-depleted cells entered mitosis, they formed multipolar spindles, arrested in metaphase, and died. We also detected aberrant centrosomes during interphase and multipolar spindles during mitosis in ldlG cells, which do not contain detectable GM130. Although GA proteins have been described to regulate mitotic centrosomes and spindle formation, this is the first report of a role for a GA protein in the regulation of centrosomes during interphase.     

The Sac3 homologue shd1 is involved in mitotic progression in mammalian cells

Saccharomyces Sac3 required for actin assembly was shown to be involved in DNA replication. Here, we studied the function of a mammalian homologue SHD1 in cell cycle progression. SHD1 is localized on centrosomes at interphase and at spindle poles and mitotic spindles, similar to alpha-tubulin, at M phase. RNA interference suppression of endogenous shd1 caused defects in centrosome duplication and spindle formation displaying cells with a single apparent centrosome and down-regulated Mad2 expression, generating increased micronuclei. Conversely, increased expression of SHD1 by DNA transfection with shd1-green fluorescent protein (gfp) vector for a fusion protein of SHD1 and GFP caused abnormalities in centrosome duplication displaying cells with multiple centrosomes and deregulated spindle assembly with up-regulated Mad2 expression until anaphase, generating polyploidy cells. These results demonstrated that shd1 is involved in cell cycle progression, in particular centrosome duplication and a spindle assembly checkpoint function.     

Centriole inheritance

Early cell biologists perceived centrosomes to be permanent cellular structures. Centrosomes were observed to reproduce once each cycle and to orchestrate assembly a transient mitotic apparatus that segregated chromosomes and a centrosome to each daughter at the completion of cell division. Centrosomes are composed of a pair of centrioles buried in a complex pericentriolar matrix. The bulk of microtubules in cells lie with one end buried in the pericentriolar matrix and the other extending outward into the cytoplasm. Centrioles recruit and organize pericentriolar material. As a result, centrioles dominate microtubule organization and spindle assembly in cells born with centrosomes. Centrioles duplicate in concert with chromosomes during the cell cycle. At the onset of mitosis, sibling centrosomes separate and establish a bipolar spindle that partitions a set of chromosomes and a centrosome to each daughter cell at the completion of mitosis and cell division. Centriole inheritance has historically been ascribed to a template mechanism in which the parental centriole contributed to, if not directed, assembly of a single new centriole once each cell cycle. It is now clear that neither centrioles nor centrosomes are essential to cell proliferation. This review examines the recent literature on inheritance of centrioles in animal cells.Key words: centrosome, centriol, spindle, mitosis, microtubule, cell cycle, checkpoints     

Telomeres and centromeres have interchangeable roles in promoting meiotic spindle formation

Telomeres and centromeres have traditionally been considered to perform distinct roles. During meiotic prophase, in a conserved chromosomal configuration called the bouquet, telomeres gather to the nuclear membrane (NM), often near centrosomes. We found previously that upon disruption of the fission yeast bouquet, centrosomes failed to insert into the NM at meiosis I and nucleate bipolar spindles. Hence, the trans-NM association of telomeres with centrosomes during prophase is crucial for efficient spindle formation. Nonetheless, in approximately half of bouquet-deficient meiocytes, spindles form properly. Here, we show that bouquet-deficient cells can successfully undergo meiosis using centromere–centrosome contact instead of telomere–centrosome contact to generate spindle formation. Accordingly, forced association between centromeres and centrosomes fully rescued the spindle defects incurred by bouquet disruption. Telomeres and centromeres both stimulate focal accumulation of the SUN domain protein Sad1 beneath the centrosome, suggesting a molecular underpinning for their shared spindle-generating ability. Our observations demonstrate an unanticipated level of interchangeability between the two most prominent chromosomal landmarks.     

Downregulation of protein 4.1R, a mature centriole protein, disrupts centrosomes, alters cell cycle progression, and perturbs mitotic spindles and anaphase

Centrosomes nucleate and organize interphase microtubules and are instrumental in mitotic bipolar spindle assembly, ensuring orderly cell cycle progression with accurate chromosome segregation. We report that the multifunctional structural protein 4.1R localizes at centrosomes to distal/subdistal regions of mature centrioles in a cell cycle-dependent pattern. Significantly, 4.1R-specific depletion mediated by RNA interference perturbs subdistal appendage proteins ninein and outer dense fiber 2/cenexin at mature centrosomes and concomitantly reduces interphase microtubule anchoring and organization. 4.1R depletion causes G(1) accumulation in p53-proficient cells, similar to depletion of many other proteins that compromise centrosome integrity. In p53-deficient cells, 4.1R depletion delays S phase, but aberrant ninein distribution is not dependent on the S-phase delay. In 4.1R-depleted mitotic cells, efficient centrosome separation is reduced, resulting in monopolar spindle formation. Multipolar spindles and bipolar spindles with misaligned chromatin are also induced by 4.1R depletion. Notably, all types of defective spindles have mislocalized NuMA (nuclear mitotic apparatus protein), a 4.1R binding partner essential for spindle pole focusing. These disruptions contribute to lagging chromosomes and aberrant microtubule bridges during anaphase/telophase. Our data provide functional evidence that 4.1R makes crucial contributions to the structural integrity of centrosomes and mitotic spindles which normally enable mitosis and anaphase to proceed with the coordinated precision required to avoid pathological events.     

Loading and Unloading: Orchestrating Centrosome Duplication and Spindle Assembly by Ran/Crm1

The cell cycle is an intricate process of DNA replication and cell division thatconcludes with the formation of two genetically equivalent daughter cells. In thisprogression, the centrosome is duplicated once and only once during the G1/S transitionto produce the bipolar spindle and ensure proper chromosome segregation. The presenceof multiple centrosomes in cancer cells suggests that this process is mis-regulated duringcarcinogenesis. This suggests that certain factors exist that license the progression ofcentrosome duplication and serve to inhibit further duplications during a single cell cycle.Recent studies suggest that the Ran/Crm1 complex not only regulates nucleocytoplasmictransport but is also independently involved in mitotic spindle assembly. Factors that arecapable of interacting with Ran/Crm1 through their nuclear export sequences, such ascyclins/cdks, p53 and Brca1/2, may potentially function as centrosome checkpoints akinto the G1/S and G2/M checkpoints of the cell cycle. Our recent findings indicate thatnucleophosmin, a protein whose trafficking is mediated by the Ran/Crm1 network, is oneof such checkpoint factors for maintaining proper centrosome duplication. We proposethat Ran/Crm1 may act as a ‘loading dock’ to coordinate various checkpoint factors inregulating the fidelity of centrosome duplication during cell cycle progression, and thedisruption of these processes may lead to genomic instability and an acceleration ofoncogenesis.     

Centrosome-independent mitotic spindle formation in vertebrates

BACKGROUND: In cells lacking centrosomes, the microtubule-organizing activity of the centrosome is substituted for by the combined action of chromatin and molecular motors. The question of whether a centrosome-independent pathway for spindle formation exists in vertebrate somatic cells, which always contain centrosomes, remains unanswered, however. By a combination of labeling with green fluorescent protein (GFP) and laser microsurgery we have been able to selectively destroy centrosomes in living mammalian cells as they enter mitosis. RESULTS: We have established a mammalian cell line in which the boundaries of the centrosome are defined by the constitutive expression of gamma-tubulin-GFP. This feature allows us to use laser microsurgery to selectively destroy the centrosomes in living cells. Here we show that this method can be used to reproducibly ablate the centrosome as a functional entity, and that after destruction the microtubules associated with the ablated centrosome disassemble. Depolymerization-repolymerization experiments reveal that microtubules form in acentrosomal cells randomly within the cytoplasm. When both centrosomes are destroyed during prophase these cells form a functional bipolar spindle. Surprisingly, when just one centrosome is destroyed, bipolar spindles are also formed that contain one centrosomal and one acentrosomal pole. Both the polar regions in these spindles are well focused and contain the nuclear structural protein NuMA. The acentrosomal pole lacks pericentrin, gamma-tubulin, and centrioles, however. CONCLUSIONS: These results reveal, for the first time, that somatic cells can use a centrosome-independent pathway for spindle formation that is normally masked by the presence of the centrosome. Furthermore, this mechanism is strong enough to drive bipolar spindle assembly even in the presence of a single functional centrosome.     

T-1, a mitotic arrester, alters centrosome configurations in fertilized sea urchin eggs

T-1 induces modifications in the shape of the centrosome at division in fertilized eggs of the North American sea urchin, Lytechinus pictus. Phase contrast microscopy observations of mitotic apparatus isolated from T-1-treated (1.7-8.5 microM) eggs at first division shows that the centrosomes already begin to spread or to separate by prophase and that the mitotic spindle is barrel-shaped. When eggs are fertilized with sperm that have been preteated with T-1, the centrosomes become flattened; the spindles are of normal length. Immunofluorescence microscopy using an anti-centrosomal monoclonal antibody reveals that T-1 modifies the structure of the centrosome so that barrel-shaped spindles with broad centrosomes are observed at metaphase, rather than the expected focused poles and fusiform spindle. Higher concentrations of T-1 induce fragmentation of centrosomes, causing abnormal accumulation of microtubules in polar regions. These results indicate that T-1 directly alters centrosomal configuration from a compact structure to a flattened or a spread structure. T-1 can be classified as a new category of mitotic drugs that may prove valuable in dissecting the molecular nature of centrosomes.