Crucial role of vHNF1 in vertebrate hepatic specification

Mouse liver induction occurs via the acquisition of ventral endoderm competence to respond to inductive signals from adjacent mesoderm, followed by hepatic specification. Little is known about the regulatory circuit involved in these processes. Through the analysis of vHnf1 (Hnf1b)-deficient embryos, generated by tetraploid embryo complementation, we demonstrate that lack of vHNF1 leads to defective hepatic bud formation and abnormal gut regionalization. Thickening of the ventral hepatic endoderm and expression of known hepatic genes do not occur. At earlier stages, hepatic specification of vHnf1(-/-) ventral endoderm is disrupted. More importantly, mutant ventral endoderm cultured in vitro loses its responsiveness to inductive FGF signals and fails to induce the hepatic-specification genes albumin and transthyretin. Analysis of liver induction in zebrafish indicates a conserved role of vHNF1 in vertebrates. Our results reveal the crucial role of vHNF1 at the earliest steps of liver induction: the acquisition of endoderm competence and the hepatic specification.     

Establishing three blastocyst lineages--then what?

Development of the mouse embryo to the blastocyst stage occurs over 3 to 4 days following fertilization of the oocyte. During this time, several molecular and morphological events take place that result in the formation of three distinct cell lineages: the trophectoderm, the epiblast, and the primitive endoderm. Many studies have investigated the processes that control lineage specification in the blastocyst including gene expression, cell signaling, cell-cell contact/positional relationships, and most recently, epigenetics. Here we review, at the molecular level, recent contributions to our understanding of the mechanisms that play a role in formation of these lineages. Additionally, we focus on the next steps in differentiation to highlight processes important in the development of those lineages that contribute to the extraembryonic tissues. In this context, we discuss the establishment of extraembryonic ectoderm and the contributions of parietal and visceral endoderm to yolk sac formation.     

BMP signaling induces visceral endoderm differentiation of XEN cells and parietal endoderm

The extraembryonic endoderm of mammals is essential for nutritive support of the fetus and patterning of the early embryo. Visceral and parietal endoderm are major subtypes of this lineage with the former exhibiting most, if not all, of the embryonic patterning properties. Extraembryonic endoderm (XEN) cell lines derived from the primitive endoderm of mouse blastocysts represent a cell culture model of this lineage, but are biased towards parietal endoderm in culture and in chimeras. In an effort to promote XEN cells to adopt visceral endoderm character we have mimicked different aspects of the in vivo environment. We found that BMP signaling promoted a mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition of XEN cells with up-regulation of E-cadherin and down-regulation of vimentin. Gene expression analysis showed the differentiated XEN cells most resembled extraembryonic visceral endoderm (exVE), a subtype of VE covering the extraembryonic ectoderm in the early embryo, and during gastrulation it combines with extraembryonic mesoderm to form the definitive yolk sac. We found that laminin, a major component of the extracellular matrix in the early embryo, synergised with BMP to promote highly efficient conversion of XEN cells to exVE. Inhibition of BMP signaling with the chemical inhibitor, Dorsomorphin, prevented this conversion suggesting that Smad1/5/8 activity is critical for exVE induction of XEN cells. Finally, we show that applying our new culture conditions to freshly isolated parietal endoderm (PE) from Reichert's membrane promoted VE differentiation showing that the PE is developmentally plastic and can be reprogrammed to a VE state in response to BMP. Generation of visceral endoderm from XEN cells uncovers the true potential of these blastocyst-derived cells and is a significant step towards modelling early developmental events ex vivo.     

X chromosome inactivation revealed by the X-linked lacZ transgene activity in periimplantation mouse embryos

Using H253 mouse stock harboring X-linked HMG-lacZ transgene, we examined X chromosome inactivation patterns in sectioned early female embryos. X-gal staining patterns were generally consistent with the paternal X inactivation in the trophectoderm and the primitive endoderm cell lineages and random inactivation in the epiblast lineages. The occurrence of embryonic visceral endoderm cells apparently at variance with the paternal X chromosome inactivation in 7.5 dpc embryos was explained by the replacement of visceral endoderm cells with cells of epiblast origin. The frequency of cells negative for X-gal staining in 4.5-5.5 dpc XmXp* embryos fluctuated considerably especially in the extraembryonic ectoderm and the primitive endoderm, whereas it was less variable in the embryonic ectoderm. We could not, however, determine whether it is a normal phenomenon revealed for the first time by the use of HMG-lacZ transgene or an abnormality caused by the multicopy transgene.     

Clonal analysis of early mammalian development

Various extrinsic markers have been used to label single cells in the early mouse embryo. However, they are appropriate only for short-term experiments because of their susceptibility to dilution. Studies on cell lineage and commitments have therefore depended mainly on exploiting genes as markers by combining cells from embryos that differ in genotype at particular loci. Tissue recombination and transplantation experiments using such indelible intrinsic markers have enabled the fate of different cell populations in the blastocyst to be determined with reasonable precision. The trophectoderm and inner cell mass (i.c.m.) give rise to distinct complementary groups of tissues in the later conceptus, as do the primitive endodermal and primitive ectodermal components of the more mature i.c.m. When cloned by blastocyst injection, single i.c.m. cells colonize only those parts of host conceptuses that are derived from their tissue of origin. Thus, while clonal descendants of early i.c.m. cells can contribute to all tissues other than those of trophectodermal origin, primitive endodermal and primitive ectodermal clones are restricted, respectively, to the extraembryonic endoderm versus all i.c.m. derivatives except the extraembryonic endoderm. Interestingly, individual primitive ectoderm cells can include both germ cells and somatic cells among their mitotic descendants. By using the genetically determined presence versus absence of cytoplasmic malic enzyme activity as a cell marker, the deployment of clones has been made visible in situ in whole-mount preparations of extraembryonic membranes. Very little mixing of donor and host cells was seen in either the endoderm of the visceral yolk sac or the mesodermal and ectodermal layers of the amnion. In contrast, mosaicism in the parietal endoderm was so fine grained that, in all except 1 of 15 fields from several specimens that were analysed, the arrangement of donor and host cells did not differ significantly from that expected on the basis of their random association.     

From fertilization to gastrulation: axis formation in the mouse embryo.

Although much remains unknown about how the embryonic axis is laid down in the mouse, it is now clear that reciprocal interactions between the extraembryonic and embryonic lineages establish and reinforce patterning of the embryo. At early post-implantation stages, the extraembryonic ectoderm appears to impart proximal-posterior identity to the adjacent proximal epiblast, whereas the distal visceral endoderm signals to the underlying epiblast to restrict posterior identity as it moves anteriorward. At gastrulation, the visceral endoderm is necessary for specifying anterior primitive streak derivatives, which, in turn, pattern the anterior epiblast. Polarity of these extraembryonic tissues can be traced back to the blastocyst stage, where asymmetry has been linked to the point of sperm entry at fertilization.     

X inactivation in the mouse embryo deficient for Dnmt1: distinct effect of hypomethylation on imprinted and random X inactivation

It has been suggested that DNA methylation plays a crucial role in genomic imprinting and X inactivation. Using DNA methyltransferase 1 (Dnmt1)-deficient mouse embryos carrying X-linked lacZ transgenes, we studied the effects of genomic demethylation on X inactivation. Based on the expression pattern of lacZ, the imprinted X inactivation in the visceral endoderm, a derivative of the extraembryonic lineage, was unaffected in Dnmt1 mutant embryos at the time other imprinted genes showed aberrant expression. Random X inactivation in the embryonic lineage of Dnmt1 mutant embryos, however, was unstable as a result of hypomethylation, causing reactivation of, at least, one lacZ transgene that had initially been repressed. Our results suggest that maintenance of imprinted X inactivation in the extraembryonic lineage can tolerate extensive demethylation while normal levels of methylation are required for stable maintenance of X inactivation in the embryonic lineage.     

Stage-specific embryonic antigen 3 as a marker of visceral extraembryonic endoderm

The distribution of the stage-specific embryonic antigen SSEA-3 was studied immunohistochemically on postimplantation mouse embryos. This carbohydrate antigen, identified as an epitope of a globo-series ganglioside isolated from human teratocarcinoma cells (Kannagi et al., 1983, J. Biol. Chem.258, 8934–8942) was originally detected on the zygote and mouse early cleavage-stage embryos. It disappears on the early blastocyst and reappears on the primitive endoderm of the implanting blastocyst (Shevinsky et al., 1982, Cell30, 697–705). We now show in the early egg cylinder (on the sixth day of pregnancy) SSEA-3 is present in the entire visceral endoderm but not in any other part of the conceptus. From Day 7 of pregnancy onward, SSEA-3 is restricted to the extraembryonic visceral endoderm and the visceral yolk sac cells. Therefore, SSEA-3 is a useful marker for this endodermal cell lineage in midgestational mouse embryos.     

Lim1 is required in both primitive streak-derived tissues and visceral endoderm for head formation in the mouse.

Lim1 is a homeobox gene expressed in the extraembryonic anterior visceral endoderm and in primitive streak-derived tissues of early mouse embryos. Mice homozygous for a targeted mutation of Lim1 lack head structures anterior to rhombomere 3 in the hindbrain. To determine in which tissues Lim1 is required for head formation and its mode of action, we have generated chimeric mouse embryos and performed tissue layer recombination explant assays. In chimeric embryos in which the visceral endoderm was composed of predominantly wild-type cells, we found that Lim1(-)(/)(-) cells were able to contribute to the anterior mesendoderm of embryonic day 7.5 chimeric embryos but that embryonic day 9.5 chimeric embryos displayed a range of head defects. In addition, early somite stage chimeras generated by injecting Lim1(-)(/)(-) embryonic stem cells into wild-type tetraploid blastocysts lacked forebrain and midbrain neural tissue. Furthermore, in explant recombination assays, anterior mesendoderm from Lim1(-)(/)(-) embryos was unable to maintain the expression of the anterior neural marker gene Otx2 in wild-type ectoderm. In complementary experiments, embryonic day 9.5 chimeric embryos in which the visceral endoderm was composed of predominantly Lim1(-)(/)(-) cells and the embryo proper of largely wild-type cells, also phenocopied the Lim1(-)(/)(-) headless phenotype. These results indicate that Lim1 is required in both primitive streak-derived tissues and visceral endoderm for head formation and that its inactivation in these tissues produces cell non-autonomous defects. We discuss a double assurance model in which Lim1 regulates sequential signaling events required for head formation in the mouse.     

Extraembryonic Endoderm cells as a model of endoderm development

In recent years the multipotent extraembryonic endoderm (XEN) stem cells have been the center of much attention. In vivo, XEN cells contribute to the formation of the extraembryonic endoderm, visceral and parietal endoderm and later on, the yolk sac. Recent data have shown that the distinction between embryonic and extraembryonic endoderm is not as strict as previously thought due to the integration, and not the displacement, of the visceral endoderm into the definitive embryonic endoderm. Therefore, cells from the extraembryonic endoderm also contribute to definitive endoderm. Many research groups focused on unraveling the potential and ability of XEN cells to both support differentiation and/or differentiate into endoderm‐like tissues as an alternative to embryonic stem (ES) cells. Moreover, the conversion of ES to XEN cells, shown recently without genetic manipulations, uncovers significant and novel molecular mechanisms involved in extraembryonic endoderm and definitive endoderm development. XEN cell lines provide a unique model for an early mammalian lineage that complements the established ES and trophoblast stem cell lines. Through the study of essential genes and signaling requirements for XEN cells in vitro, insights will be gained about the developmental program of the extraembryonic and embryonic endodermal lineage in vivo. This review will provide an overview on the current literature focusing on XEN cells as a model for primitive endoderm and possibly definitive endoderm as well as the potential of using these cells for therapeutic applications.     

Lectin receptors on the peri- and early post-implantation mouse embryo

Summary Mouse embryos at the blastocyst, blastocyst outgrowth, and primitive streak (day 7.5) stages of development were analysed for expression of lectin receptors using a panel of six FITC-conjugated lectins with affinities for five distinct saccharides (BSL, ConA, DBA, LTL, UEA and WGA). Blastocyst trophoblast expressed receptors for all the lectins but later tissues of the trophectoderm lineage lost receptors for distinct but overlapping subsets of the lectin panel. The inner cell mass (ICM) of the early blastocyst lacked receptors only for UEA. Differentiation of primary endoderm was accompanied by the aquisition of UEA receptors but subsequent differentiation into visceral and parietal endoderm involved the loss of receptors for both fucose binding lectins (UEA and LTL). Embryonic ectoderm in the day 7.5 egg cylinder retained receptors only for ConA and WGA. Thus, in general, differentiation during the peri- and early post-implantation period was associated with a differential loss of lectin receptors in all cell lineages of the mouse conceptus.     

Indian hedgehog signaling in extraembryonic endoderm and ectoderm differentiation in ES embryoid bodies

We previously demonstrated that a member of the Hedgehog gene family, Indian hedgehog (Ihh), is expressed in the visceral endoderm of EC and ES cell embryoid bodies and mouse embryos. Overexpression studies suggested that Ihh was involved in visceral endoderm differentiation. We now provide evidence for a Hh response in the embryoid body core and in the mesothelial layer of the visceral yolk sac. We also demonstrate that treatment of ES embryoid bodies with the Hh antagonists cAMP and forskolin results in downregulation of the Hh response and altered embryoid body differentiation. The outer endoderm layer undergoes a transition to parietal endoderm while formation of an embryonic ectoderm layer surrounding a cavity is inhibited. These treatments also result in a decrease in the expression of markers for the mesoderm derivatives, blood and endothelial cells. We present a model to explain how Ihh and BMP signaling may regulate extraembryonic endoderm and embryonic ectoderm differentiation.     

SPARC synthesis in pre-implantation and early post-implantation mouse embryos

Summary SPARC (secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine), also known as osteonectin and BM-40, is a secreted protein associated with a variety of embryonic and adult tissue and cell types, including placenta, parietal and visceral endoderm, certain epithelia (e.g. gut, skin, glandular epithelia), and regions of active chondrogenesis and osteogenesis. Although much is known concerning the tissue distribution of this protein, neither the time and location of its initial appearance nor its functions during embryogenesis have been clearly established. We identified the location of SPARC on two-dimensional protein gels. By using two-dimensional gel analysis of both pre- and post-implantation stage mouse embryos, we find that SPARC is initially synthesized between 3.5 and 4.5 days of embryogenesis. This is the earliest time during development at which synthesis of SPARC has been demonstrated. Inner cell masses isolated from 4.5 day blastocysts synthesize SPARC indicating that either primitive ectoderm, primitive endoderm, or both produce this protein. SPARC synthesis is also detectable in isolated trophoblast vesicles. Thus, SPARC is synthesized not only in placenta, parietal endoderm, and visceral endoderm, but in the precursors of these tissues as well. Examination of 7.5 day embryos reveals that SPARC is synthesized in isolated parietal yolk sac and in whole extraembryonic and embryonic regions. Relative to other proteins, synthesis of SPARC was most prevalent in the parietal yolk sac. The possible implications of SPARC synthesis as early as 4.5 days are discussed.     

Differential localization of TGF-beta 2 in mouse preimplantation and early postimplantation development

The localization of transforming growth factor type beta 2 (TGF-beta 2) has been followed during preimplantation and early postimplantation murine development using an anti-peptide antibody that specifically recognizes TGF-beta 2. The staining pattern showed that TGF-beta 2 is expressed from the four-cell stage onward and is differentially regulated as cells diverge to various lineages. High levels of staining were found in the trophectoderm of the blastocyst but no staining was observed in the inner cell mass. During postimplantation development the primitive and embryonic ectoderm also lacked detectable staining while visceral endoderm stained well. Parietal endoderm cells also showed positive staining reaction although to a lesser extent than visceral endoderm cells. These findings were confirmed in model systems of the embryo, namely, embryonal carcinoma and embryonic stem cells differentiated to to cells with either visceral or parietal endoderm characteristics. The possible regulatory role of this factor in early embryogenesis is discussed.