DNA binding properties of the vitamin D3 receptor zinc finger region.

The DNA binding domains of the nuclear receptor superfamily are highly conserved and consist of residues that fold into two zinc finger-like motifs, suggesting that the structures of this region among the members of the superfamily are likely to be very similar. Furthermore, the response elements that these receptors bind to are similar in sequence and organization. Nevertheless, these receptors selectively recognize target response elements and differentially regulate linked genes. In order to study the details of receptor:DNA binding, we have overexpressed and purified the vitamin D3 receptor DNA binding domain (VDRF) and have begun characterizing its DNA binding properties. We find that the VDRF protein binds strongly and specifically to direct repeats constituting a vitamin D response element from the mouse osteopontin (Spp-1) promoter region but weakly to the human osteocalcin vitamin D response element. Unlike receptors that recognize hormone response elements oriented as inverted repeats, such as the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and estrogen receptor, VDRF appears to bind half-sites noncooperatively, without the free energy contribution of dimerization seen when the glucocorticoid receptor DNA binding domain associates with a glucocorticoid response element. By comparing and contrasting the DNA binding properties of the vitamin D and glucocorticoid receptors, we suggest a model for how receptors that prefer direct repeats differ in their binding strategy from those that recognize inverted repeats.     

Complex human glucocorticoid receptor dim mutations define glucocorticoid induced apoptotic resistance in bone cells

A mutation in the D-loop of the second zinc finger of the DNA-binding domain of the human glucocorticoid receptor (hGR), A458T (GR(dim)), has been suggested to be essential for dimerization and DNA binding of the GR, and genetically altered GR(dim) mice survive, whereas murine GR knockout mice die. Interestingly, thymocytes isolated from the GR(dim) mice were reported to be resistant to glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis. To further evaluate the dim mutations in glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis, we stably expressed either the hGR(dim) (A458T) or the hGR(dim4) (A458T, R460D, D462C, and N454D) mutant receptors in human osteosarcoma (U-2 OS) cells that are devoid of hGR and unresponsive to glucocorticoids. We analyzed these cell lines by comparison with a stable expression hGRα U-2 OS cell line, which undergoes apoptosis after glucocorticoid treatment. Transient reporter gene assays with glucocorticoid response element-driven vectors revealed that the hGR(dim) mutation had diminished steroid responsiveness and cells carrying the hGR(dim4) mutation were unresponsive to steroid, whereas glucocorticoid-induced nuclear factor κB repression was unaffected by either mutation. Interestingly, both the hGR(dim) and hGR(dim4) receptors readily formed dimers as measured by immunoprecipitation. Examination of GR-mediated apoptosis showed that hGR(dim) cells were only partially resistant to apoptosis, whereas hGR(dim4) cells were completely resistant to glucocorticoid-induced cell death despite remaining sensitive to other apoptotic stimuli. Global gene expression analysis revealed that hGR(dim4) cells widely regulated gene expression but differentially regulated apoptotic mRNA when compared with cells expressing wild-type hGRα. These studies challenge conclusions drawn from previous studies of GR dim mutants.     

Characterization of a monoclonal antibody that probes the functional domains of the glucocorticoid receptor.

Monoclonal antibodies to the rat hepatic glucocorticoid receptor (GR) were produced by using 4000-fold-purified unactivated rat hepatic GR as the immunogen in an immunization in vitro. Hybridomas were screened for anti-GR antibody production by using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The antibody, 3A6, described here, is an IgM (lambda). The interaction of 3A6 with the purified GR was explored by sedimentation analysis, where a shift of the 9 S GR to a form with a higher s20,w value was demonstrated. Binding specificity and sensitivity were demonstrated by protein immunoblotting. 3A6 cross-reacted with all rat tissue glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) examined, except those of the brain. Species cross-reactivity was observed with other mammalian GRs (from human CEM-C7 cells and from pig and mouse liver). Immunocytochemical localization of the GR was assessed by indirect immunofluorescence in intact fixed cells, which demonstrated intense cytoplasmic staining in the absence of pretreatment with glucocorticoids and nuclear localization when cells were pretreated with glucocorticoids. This monoclonal antibody significantly inhibited steroid binding to unoccupied receptor and DNA binding of activated steroid-receptor complexes. Furthermore, preincubation of the purified activated GR complex with 3A6 prevented phosphorylation of the GR in vitro. Thus 3A6 differs from previous monoclonal antibodies to the GR in its capacity to cross-react with the human GR and by its specificity for an epitope on or near a functional domain of the GR.     

Quantitative analysis of the glucocorticoid receptor-DNA interaction at the mouse mammary tumor virus glucocorticoid response element

Purified glucocorticoid receptor (GR) from rat liver was used for a quantitative analysis of the protein-DNA interaction at specific GR-binding segments within the 5'-long terminal repeat of the mouse mammary tumor virus. A truncated receptor was generated and used to demonstrate formation of heterodimeric GR, which furthermore was shown to be in rapid equilibrium with receptor-monomer. The relative affinity for GR binding to specific GR sites versus random calf thymus DNA was approximately 2 x 10(3). At equilibrium a free GR concentration of 3 x 10(-10) M was required for half-maximal saturation of the two functionally important DNA sites within the mouse mammary tumor virus 5'-long terminal repeat. Although these two DNA segments act synergistically in mediating hormonal response, we did not detect cooperative GR binding to these regions in vitro. However, GR bound cooperatively within the downstream binding region. Similarly, GR was unable to facilitate factor binding to a neighboring nuclear factor 1 site, another essential element in the promoter. In contrast, nuclear factor 1 binding was inhibited slightly by GR.