Comparison of M.I.C.E. and Etest with CLSI Agar Dilution for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing against Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus spp

Objective

The main objective of this study was to comparatively evaluate the performance of M.I.C.E. and Etest methodologies to that of agar dilution for determining the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp.

Methods

A total of 100 oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. isolates were collected from hospitalized patients at a teaching hospital. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid was performed using the reference CLSI agar dilution method (2009), Etest and M.I.C.E. methodologies. The MIC values were interpreted according to CLSI susceptibility breakpoints and compared by regression analysis.

Results

In general, the essential agreement (±1-log₂) between M.I.C.E. and CLSI agar dilution was 93.0%, 84.0% and 77.0% for linezolid, teicoplanin and vancomycin, respectively. Essential agreement rates between M.I.C.E. and Etest were excellent (>90.0%) for all antibiotics tested. Both strips (M.I.C.E. and Etest) yielded two very major errors for linezolid. Unacceptable minor rates were observed for teicoplanin against CoNS and for vancomycin against S. aureus.

Conclusions

According to our results, linezolid and teicoplanin MICs against all staphylococci and S. aureus, respectively, were more accurately predicted by M.I.C.E. strips. However, the Etest showed better performance than M.I.C.E. for predicting vancomycin MICs against all staphylococci. Thus, microbiologists must be aware of the different performance of commercially available gradient strips against staphylococci.     

Campylobacter and fluoroquinolones: a bias data set?

There is no universally accepted standard method for the isolation of Campylobacter spp. and it is considered that currently available isolation media are not yet optimal for the recovery of Campylobacter spp. from a range of sample types. Almost all methods incorporate antibiotics into the isolation media to inhibit growth of other bacteria within the sample. It is established that the incorporation of such antibiotics into isolation media will inhibit the growth of some Campylobacter spp. as well as other bacteria. The results of the use of such suboptimal isolation methods are that the isolates which 'survive' the isolation procedure will be those which: (i) are able to 'out compete' the rest of the bacteria in the sample, i.e. they are able to grow faster; (ii) are resistant to the antibiotics used in the isolation media; and (iii) are randomly selected by the laboratory technician as being a 'typical'Campylobacter spp. It is clear that such a procedure is intrinsically biased and will mean that species resistant to the antibiotics used in the media will be isolated. This introduces real doubt that the bacteria isolated are truly representative of those initially found on the sample. It is also becoming clear that Campylobacter spp. are rather difficult to isolate as pure cultures and many are in fact mixtures of more than one strain. Again this introduces great uncertainty as to the prevalence and distribution of respective species from the different sample types. This is especially true when considering isolation of Campylobacter spp. causing disease in man as there is no certainty that the selected isolate is that which was responsible for disease. The incorporation of antibiotics into the isolation media not only introduces the issue of species bias but perhaps more importantly exposes the Campylobacter spp. to a cocktail of antibiotics thereby providing the potential for them to 'switch on' antibiotic resistance mechanisms. It might be argued that this has always been the case for isolation of Campylobacter spp., however, we know that the antibiotic cocktails used in media over the last 10 years have changed and indeed there was a time when the filtration protocol which didn't use antibiotics was more widely used. As most reports in the literature do not state what methods were used to isolate Campylobacter spp. it is not possible to quantify any relationship between antibiotics used in the isolation media and susceptibility data. An approved method for Campylobacter susceptibility testing was not available until May 2002, all data generated prior to this date will have been generated using non-standard methods. As tremendous variability in the reproducibility data for Campylobacter spp. was observed during the development of the standard agar dilution susceptibility method, data generated with disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods must be considered with caution. It has been shown that, compared with the conventional agar dilution method, the E-test tends to give rise to lower minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for sensitive strains and higher MICs for resistant strains. There are no recommended antibiotic breakpoint concentrations for Campylobacter spp. A breakpoint is used to separate sensitive from resistant strains of bacteria and is thus crucial to any discussion of antibiotic resistance. This discussion is further complicated by introduction of the terms microbiological and clinical breakpoints. While a microbiological breakpoint can be a useful parameter with regard to identifying resistance factors it cannot on its own be used to predict whether that bacteria will respond to treatment from an appropriate antibiotic. Predicting clinical response is a function of the clinical breakpoint which considers the pharmacokinetic profile of the antimicrobial compound, i.e. the concentration of the antimicrobial compound in the body and the MIC. The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) uses microbiological, pharmacokinetic and clinical data to establish breakpoints, without c and clinical data to establish breakpoints, without such considerations it is not possible to consider what is truly clinically sensitive and resistant. There are no reported studies that have systematically determined appropriate breakpoints for Campylobacter, there are data however, which relate MICs to clinical outcome. It is without dispute that microbiological resistance in Campylobacter spp. occurs as a result of mutation in the gyrA gene with single point mutations most frequently causing a four- to eightfold shift in the MIC. What is also clear is that if a high enough concentration of antimicrobial relative to MIC of the infecting organism can be achieved not only will the parent organism be killed but also the 'resistant' mutant. Considering the above and the concentrations of ciprofloxacin achieved in the gastro-intestinal tract it is not surprising that clinical cure can be demonstrated for organisms with an MIC of 32 microg ml(-1).     

Comparison of disc diffusion, Etest and agar dilution for susceptibility testing of colistin against Enterobacteriaceae

Aims: In this study, we compared different methods of colistin susceptibility testing, disc diffusion, agar dilution and Etest using a set of Enterobacteriaceae isolates that included colistin‐resistant strains. Methods and results: Susceptibility of 200 clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae to colistin was tested to compare agar dilution (reference method), disc diffusion (50 and 10 μg) and Etest. MICs (minimum inhibitory concentrations) were interpreted using the criteria established by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Colistin exhibited excellent activity against Escherichia coli and E. cloacae (MIC₉₀ = 0·5 mg l^?1). In contrast, colistin was less active against Klebsiella pneumoniae (MIC₉₀ = 16 mg l^?1). Resistance rates varied from 0% in E. coli to 1·8% in E. cloacae and 13% in K. pneumoniae. High rates of very major errors were observed in the disc diffusion test using either the criteria of the Comité de l’antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie (CA‐SFM) or the criteria of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), respectively, 3·5 and 2·5%. When the criteria of Gales et al. were applied, the number of very major errors was reduced to one (0·5%). The Etest showed good concordance with agar dilution method. Conclusion: Disc susceptibility testing methods are unreliable on detecting colistin resistance. MIC should be determined to confirm the susceptibility results by disc diffusion. Significance and Impact of the study: We recommend the determination of MIC by Etest for all multidrug‐resistant Enterobacteriaceae when colistin is required for the treatment.     

Etest for assessing the susceptibility of filamentous fungi

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Etest as an in vitro antifungal susceptibility test method for different moulds originating from human samples and from the environment. A total of 50 isolates (1 Acremonium, 18 Aspergillus, 2 Cladosporium, 1 Epicoccum, 15 Penicillium, 2 Scopulariopsis and 11 Trichoderma strains) were tested by the Etest. Forty-six of the tested moulds (92%) were resistant to fluconazole with minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) > or = 256 microg ml(-1). There were strains resistant to ketoconazole among Aspergillus niger, A. ochraceus and Cladosporium spp. with MICs > 32 microg ml(-1). For fluconazole, no differences were observed using two different inocula, while for itraconazole, ketoconazole and amphotericin B, a 1 or less step 2-fold dilution difference in MIC was seen for the most of 10 selected strains. The MICs of fluconazole and amphotericin B obtained for Trichoderma strains by the Etest and the agar dilution method were also compared. MICs for fluconazole were in agreement, while MICs for amphotericin B were higher with 1 or 2 steps of 2-fold dilutions for most of Trichoderma strains in the case of the agar dilution method.     

Reliability of the Etest in light of the correlation between an antibiotic's critical concentration (Cc) and MIC values.

The study relates to the theory of diffusion methods for antibiotic sensitivity testing. The aim of the study was to show the relationship between the antibiotic critical concentration (Cc) and its minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The results contribute to the explanation of the Etest's reliability and support the scientific basis for MIC determination using agar diffusion methods. Susceptibility among 90 clinical isolates of 12 common aerobic bacterial species to gentamicin, erythromycin, or oxacillin was assessed using the multidisc method (for Cc), by the agar dilution method (for MIC) and by the Etest. The results of all three methods were statistically compared and found to be closely related. The regression equation for Cc values and MIC was log2(MIC) = 0.99 x log2(Cc)-0.13; r = 0.99; p < 0.05; the regression equation for Cc values and Etest-MIC (Et) was log2(Et) = 0.86 x log2 (Cc)+0.34; r = 0.96; p < 0.05; the regression equation for Etest-MIC values and MIC was log2(MIC) = 1.12 x log2(Et)-0.50; r = 0.96; p < 0.05.     

Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances

The aim of broth and agar dilution methods is to determine the lowest concentration of the assayed antimicrobial agent (minimal inhibitory concentration, MIC) that, under defined test conditions, inhibits the visible growth of the bacterium being investigated. MIC values are used to determine susceptibilities of bacteria to drugs and also to evaluate the activity of new antimicrobial agents. Agar dilution involves the incorporation of different concentrations of the antimicrobial substance into a nutrient agar medium followed by the application of a standardized number of cells to the surface of the agar plate. For broth dilution, often determined in 96-well microtiter plate format, bacteria are inoculated into a liquid growth medium in the presence of different concentrations of an antimicrobial agent. Growth is assessed after incubation for a defined period of time (16-20 h) and the MIC value is read. This protocol applies only to aerobic bacteria and can be completed in 3 d.     

Antifungal susceptibility of bloodstream yeasts isolated at a public children's hospital in Brazil: comparison of the Etest and the AFST-EUCAST microdilution method

This study compared the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results from the proposed standard methods of the Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee of the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (AFST-EUCAST) with the commercial system Etest(R) in the evaluation of susceptibility to flucytosine, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B of 136 Candida spp. isolated from the blood of hospitalized children. The results presented a greater agreement among Etest(R) MICs +/-2 log2 dilutions of AFST-EUCAST for fluconazole (98.1% and 96.3%) and voriconazole (100% and 100%) for Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis. For Candida glabrata, the agreement was greater only for fluconazole (81.8%) and voriconazole (100%). For amphotericin B, the agreement between the methods was low for all species. The agreement percentage among the Etest(R) and AFST-EUCAST susceptibility profiles was high according to the MIC breakpoints recommended by the M27-A2 protocol for the majority of the yeasts, except for fluconazole and itraconazole against Candida tropicalis and for itraconazole against C. glabrata and Candida krusei. According to both methodologies, a great number of Candida spp. isolates showed an in vitro susceptibility to all evaluated antifungal agents. Overall, both procedures can be reliable techniques for susceptibility tests of yeasts, but the assessment of interlaboratory agreement and correlation of MICs by different methods with in vivo response are of great importance.     

Primary resistance of Helicobacter pylori to antimicrobial agents in Polish children

Helicobacter pylori resistance to antimicrobial agents is an important factor compromising the efficacy of treatment. Therefore the aims of our study were: to determine the prevalence of H. pylori resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole, amoxycillin and tetracycline in children prior to eradication therapy, to compare different methods of susceptibility testing and to detect mutations responsible for clarithromycin resistance. During 1996-2000, 259 H. pylori strains were isolated from antral gastric biopsies. Susceptibility to antimicrobials was determined by the agar dilution method and the Etest. Mutations in the 23S rRNA gene associated with clarithromycin resistance were analysed by PCR-RFLP and direct sequencing. Overall, ninety-six strains (37%) were resistant to metronidazole, 50 strains (19.3%) were resistant to clarithromycin, and 20 strains (7.7%) were simultaneously resistant to both drugs. All cultured isolates were sensitive to amoxycillin and only one isolate (0.4%) was resistant to tetracycline. The agar dilution method and the Etest showed a perfect category correlation for clarithromycin and 4% discrepancies for metronidazole. Primary resistance to clarithromycin was mainly associated with an A2143G mutation in the 23S rRNA gene of H. pylori. The study highlights the high prevalence of H. pylori primary resistance to clarithromycin in Polish children, which implies a need for pretreatment susceptibility testing.     

In vitro antimicrobial activity of propolis samples from different geographical origins against certain oral pathogens

Propolis is an agent having antimicrobial properties, however, its composition can vary depending on the area where it is collected. In the present study, the antimicrobial activity of five propolis samples, collected from four different regions in Turkey and from Brazil, against nine anaerobic strains was evaluated. Ethanol extracts of propolis (EEP) were prepared from propolis samples and we determined minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) of EEP on the growth of test microorganisms by using agar dilution method. All strains were susceptible and MIC values ranged from 4 to 512 microg/ml for propolis activity. Propolis from Kazan-Ankara showed most effective MIC values to the studied microorganisms. MBC values of Kazan-Ankara EEP samples were ranged from 8 to 512 microg/ml. Death was observed within 4 h of incubation for Peptostreptococcus anaerobius and micros and Lactobacillus acidophilus and Actinomyces naeslundii, while 8 h for Prevotella oralis and Prevotella melaninogenica and Porphyromonas gingivalis, 12 h for Fusobacterium nucleatum, 16 h for Veillonella parvula. It was shown that propolis samples were more effective against Gram positive anaerobic bacteria than Gram negative ones. The organic chemical compositions of EEPs were determined by high-resolution gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The main compounds of EEPs were flavonoids such as pinobanksin, quercetin, naringenin, galangine, chrysin and aromatic acids such as cafeic acid. Because of increased antimicrobial resistance, propolis may be kept in mind in the treatment of oral cavity diseases.     

Significance of anaerobic preincubation of Helicobacter pylori for measuring metronidazole susceptibility by the Etest.

The Etest is widely used for measuring the susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori to metronidazole. By using 55 H. pylori isolates from 55 patients and a standard H. pylori strain, NCTC11637, we compared metronidazole susceptibility results obtained from the Etest with or without anaerobic preincubation to those obtained from the agar dilution method. Mueller Hinton agar plates supplemented with 5% horse blood were used for both methods. For the Etest, plates were incubated for 72 hr at 35 C under microaerophilic conditions after 0-, 4- or 24-hr periods of anaerobic preincubation. For the agar dilution method, the plates were incubated at the same microaerophilic conditions as those for the Etest. Without anaerobic preincubation for the Etest, 39 of the 56 (70%) H. pylori isolates were categorized as resistant to metronidazole (minimal inhibitory concentration>8 mg/liter), whereas only one of the 56 (1.8%) isolates was resistant according to the agar dilution method. The resistant and susceptible agreement rate was 32%. Four-hour anaerobic preincubation did not alter the readings of the Etest significantly. However, when the Etest was performed with 24-hr anaerobic preincubation, the number of isolates categorized as resistant was reduced to six (11%), improving the agreement rate to 91%. For measuring the metronidazole susceptibility of H. pylori by the Etest, 24-hr anaerobic preincubation is necessary to agree with the results obtained by the agar dilution test.     

Comparison of Neisseria gonorrhoeae MICs obtained by Etest and agar dilution for ceftriaxone,cefpodoxime, cefixime and azithromycin

We evaluated Neisseria gonorrhoeae Etest minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) relative to agar dilution MICs for 664 urethral isolates for ceftriaxone (CRO) and azithromycin (AZM), 351 isolates for cefpodoxime (CPD) and 315 isolates for cefixime (CFM). Etest accurately determined CPD, CFM and AZM MICs, but resulted in higher CRO MICs.     

Antimicrobial potentiality of a new non-antibiotic: the cardiovascular drug oxyfedrine hydrochloride

Ten cardiovascular drugs, having diverse pharmacological action, were screened for possible antimicrobial property against known eight sensitive bacteria, belonging to Gram positive and Gram negative types. Although five drugs failed to show antimicrobial activity and three had moderate antimicrobial action, oxyfedrine HCl and dobutamine were seen to possess pronounced antimicrobial property. Oxyfedrine was further tested in vitro against 471 strains of bacteria from two Gram positive and fourteen Gram negative genera. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of oxyfedrine was determined by agar dilution method, which ranged from 50-200 microg/ml in most of the strains, while some strains were inhibited at even lower concentrations. In animal experiments, this compound was capable of offering significant protection to Swiss strain of white mice, challenged with 50 median lethal dose (MLD) of a virulent strain of Salmonella typhimurium at concentrations of 15, 30 and 60 microg/mouse. The in vivo results were highly significant according to chi-square test.     

Can We Achieve Clinical Breakpoints for the Triazoles in Aspergillosis?

The azoles are first-line agents for the treatment of aspergillosis. A number of recent studies have shown increasing rates of resistance in A. fumigatus. Consequently, reliable in vitro susceptibility testing and breakpoints that appropriately classify resistant isolates are of paramount importance. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) have developed susceptibility testing standards, but so far no breakpoints have been defined. The following aspects are evaluated during the process of developing EUCAST breakpoints: the most common dosage, the definition of the wild-type population and epidemiologic cutoff values, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, and the correlation between the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and clinical outcome. This article reviews the issues to be considered before breakpoints can be established for azole drugs and Aspergillus and describes how MICs can be interpreted until clinical breakpoints have been defined.     

In vitro antimicrobial activity of propolis and synergism between propolis and antimicrobial drugs

The aim of this study was to investigate antimicrobial properties of ethanolic extract of 13 propolis (EEP) samples from different regions of Serbia against 39 microorganisms (14 resistant or multiresistant to antibiotics), and to determine synergistic activity between antimicrobials and propolis. Antimicrobial activity of propolis samples was evaluated by agar diffusion and agar dilution method. The synergistic action of propolis with antimicrobial drugs was assayed by the disc diffusion method on agar containing subinhibitory concentrations of propolis. Obtained results indicate that EEP, irrespectively of microbial resistance to antibiotics, showed significant antimicrobial activities against Gram-positive bacteria (MIC 0.078%–1.25% of EEP) and yeasts (0.16%–1.25%), while Gram-negative bacteria were less susceptible (1.25&%ndash;>5%). Enterococcus faecalis was the most resistant Gram-positive bacterium, Salmonella spp. the most resistant Gram-negative bacteria, and Candida albicans the most resistant yeast. EEP showed synergism with selected antibiotics, and displayed ability to enhance the activities of antifungals. The shown antimicrobial potential of propolis alone or in combination with certain antibiotics and antifungals is of potential medical interest.     

Reduced susceptibility to triclosan in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Susceptibility to triclosan in Staphylococcus aureus was determined. The study was carried out on 200 strains, including 100 resistant (MRSA) and 100 susceptibile (MSSA) to methicillin. The examined strains were isolated from varied clinical samples and patients in 18 medical centers, in majority from hospitals in the region of Gdansk. The susceptibility was estimated by the MIC (minimal inhibitory concentration) using dilution test in Mueller-Hinton agar. The antimicrobial resistance patterns were determined, including resistance to methicillin and mupirocin. The most of MRSA strains (62%) demonstrated reduced susceptibility to triclosan (MIC 2mg/L), while 93% of MSSA strains were highly sensitive to this antibacterial agent (MIC 0,031mg/L). The majority (66,1%) of MRSA strains with reduced susceptibility to triclosan demonstrated the same antimicrobial resistance pattern. Reduced susceptibility to triclosan was observed in 8 from 9 high - level mupirocin resistant strains, but the most of MRSA strains with reduced triclosan susceptibility (91,5%) were found among fusidic acid resistant strains.     

Bacillus cereus from blood cultures: virulence genes, antimicrobial susceptibility and risk factors for blood stream infection

We characterized the profiles of virulence genes and antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus cereus isolates from blood cultures as well as the risk factors for blood stream infections (BSIs). The diversity of virulence gene patterns was found to be wide among 15 B. cereus isolates from BSIs and also among 11 isolates from contaminated blood cultures. The MicroScan broth microdilution method yielded results corresponding with those of the agar dilution (reference) method for levofloxacin, linezolid, and vancomycin, while the Etest results were consistent with the reference results for clindamycin, gentamicin, imipenem, levofloxacin, and linezolid. Compared with the reference values, however, some isolates showed marked differences of the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for ampicillin and clindamycin when determined using the MicroScan method, or the MICs for ampicillin, meropenem, and vancomycin when determined using the Etest method. Significantly more patients were treated with antimicrobials for more than 3 days during the 3-month period before isolation in the BSI group. Prior antimicrobial therapy may be a risk factor for BSIs due to B. cereus.     

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium difficile isolated from neonatal pigs with enteritis

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of eight antimicrobial agents was determined by the agar dilution method for 80 isolates of Clostridium difficile from neonatal pigs with enteritis. MICs(50) for erythromycin, tilmicosin, and tylosin were relatively low (0.25-0.50 microg/mL), but MICs(90) (64 or > or =256 microg/mL) suggest in vivo resistance of a proportion of isolates. Susceptibility to tetracycline varied widely, with MIC(50) and MIC(90) of 8 and 32 microg/mL, respectively. The MICs(90) for tiamulin (8 microg/mL) and virginiamycin (16 microg/mL) suggest moderate susceptibility. Bacitracin and ceftiofur (MICs(90) > or =256 microg/mL) have little activity against C. difficile. Tiamulin and virginiamycin may decrease fecal shedding of C. difficile by sows, and erythromycin, tetracycline, and tylosin may be useful for treatment of infected piglets.     

外排泵抑制剂对阴沟肠杆菌耐药表型影响

目的探讨主动外排泵在临床分离阴沟肠杆菌多重耐药的作用。方法收集、分离及鉴定阴沟肠杆菌,采用琼脂稀释法测定多重耐药泵抑制剂氰氯苯腙(carbonyl cyanldem-chlorophenylhydrazone,CCCP)应用前后,阴沟肠杆菌对头孢他啶、阿米卡星、阿奇霉素、左氧氟沙星和四环素5种抗生素的最小抑菌浓度(MIC)的变化。结果以上述5种抗生素为底物8,3株阴沟肠杆菌中,分别有303、61、9、32和28株在10μg/mL CCCP条件下MIC值降低4倍或4倍以上,其中有19株同时对3种及以上抗生素有明显外排作用。外排泵存在于耐药株和非耐药株中,但对耐药株的影响较大。结论主动外排系统广泛存在于临床分离阴沟肠杆菌中,是引起阴沟肠杆菌多重耐药的重要机制。外排泵抑制剂CCCP可增加阴沟肠杆菌对抗菌药物的敏感性。     

A new antimicrobial susceptibility testing method of Escherichia coli against ampicillin by MSPQC

A new antimicrobial susceptibility testing method by multi-channel series piezoelectric quartz crystal (MSPQC) was proposed. This method was used to test susceptibility of clinical Escherichia coli isolates against ampicillin. Both the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and interpretive categorization of clinical E. coli isolates were determined by proposed method. Comparing tests were run at the same time by the agar dilution method and the disk diffusion method. The experimental results showed that MSPQC method had a good agreement with the reference methods. Compared with those methods, the MSPQC method is simple, rapid, and convenient to perform. It can offer both a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and an interpretive category result.     

Alaska sentinel surveillance for antimicrobial resistance in Helicobacter pylori isolates from Alaska native persons, 1999-2003

BACKGROUND: Previous studies in Alaska have demonstrated elevated proportions of antimicrobial resistance among Helicobacter pylori isolates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed H. pylori data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s sentinel surveillance in Alaska from July 1999 to June 2003 to determine the proportion of culture-positive biopsies from Alaska Native persons undergoing routine upper-endoscopy, and the susceptibility of H. pylori isolates to metronidazole [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of > 8 g metronidazole/mL), clarithromycin (MIC > or = 1), tetracycline (MIC > or = 2) and amoxicillin (MIC > or = 1)] using agar dilution. RESULTS: Nine-hundred sixty-four biopsy specimens were obtained from 687 participants; 352 (51%) patients tested culture positive. Mean age of both culture-positive and culture-negative patients was 51 years. Metronidazole resistance was demonstrated in isolates from 155 (44%) persons, clarithromycin resistance from 108 (31%) persons, amoxicillin resistance from 8 (2%) persons, and 0 for tetracycline resistance. Metronidazole and clarithromycin resistance varied by geographic region. Female patients were more likely than male subjects to show metronidazole resistance (p < .01) and clarithromycin resistance (p = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Resistance to metronidazole and clarithromycin is more common among H. pylori isolates from Alaska Native persons when compared with those from elsewhere in the USA.