The same two monomers within a MuA tetramer provide the DDE domains for the strand cleavage and strand transfer steps of transposition.

The chemistry of Mu transposition is executed within a tetrameric form of the Mu transposase (MuA protein). A triad of DDE (Asp, Asp35Glu motif) residues in the central domain of MuA (DDE domain) is essential for both the strand cleavage and strand transfer steps of transposition. Previous studies had suggested that complete Mu transposition requires all four subunits in the MuA tetramer to carry an active DDE domain. Using a mixture of MuA proteins with either wild-type or altered att-DNA binding specificities, we have now designed specific arrangements of MuA subunits carrying the DDE domain. From analysis of the abilities of oriented tetramers to carry out DNA cleavage and strand transfer from supercoiled DNA, a new picture of the disposition of DNA and protein partners during transposition has emerged. For DNA cleavage, two subunits of MuA located at attL1 and attR1 (sites that undergo cleavage) provide DDE residues in trans. The same two subunits contribute DDE residues for strand transfer, also in trans. Thus, only two active DDE+ monomers within the tetramer carry out complete Mu transposition. We also show that when the attR1-R2 arrangement used on supercoiled substrates is tested for cleavage on linear substrates, alternative chemically competent DNA-protein associations are produced, wherein the functional DDE subunits are positioned at R2 rather than at R1.     

Domain III function of Mu transposase analysed by directed placement of subunits within the transpososome

Assembly of the functional tetrameric form of Mu transposase (MuA protein) at the two att ends of Mu depends on interaction of MuA with multiple att and enhancer sites on supercoiled DNA, and is stimulated by MuB protein. The N-terminal domain I of MuA harbours distinct regions for interaction with the att ends and enhancer; the C-terminal domain III contains separate regions essential for tetramer assembly and interaction with MuB protein (IIIα and IIIβ, respectively). Although the central domain II (the ‘DDE’ domain) of MuA harbours the known catalytic DDE residues, a 26 amino acid peptide within IIIα also has a non-specific DNA binding and nuclease activity which has been implicated in catalysis. One model proposes that active sites for Mu transposition are assembled by sharing structural/catalytic residues between domains II and III present on separate MuA monomers within the MuA tetramer. We have used substrates with altered att sites and mixtures of MuA proteins with either wild-type or altered att DNA binding specificities, to create tetrameric arrangements wherein specific MuA subunits are nonfunctional in II, IIIα or IIIβ domains. From the ability of these oriented tetramers to carry out DNA cleavage and strand transfer we conclude that domain IIIα or IIIβ function is not unique to a specific subunit within the tetramer, indicative of a structural rather than a catalytic function for domain III in Mu transposition.     

Instability of transposase activity: Evidence from bacteriophage Mu DNA replication

Transposition of genetic elements involves coupled replication and integration events catalyzed in part by a class of proteins called transposases. We have asked whether the transposase activity of bacteriophage Mu (the Mu A protein) is stable and capable of catalyzing multiple rounds of coupled replication/integration, or whether its continued synthesis is required to maintain Mu DNA replication. Inhibition of protein synthesis during the lytic cycle with chloramphenicol inhibited Mu DNA synthesis with a half-life of approximately 3 min, demonstrating a need for continued protein synthesis to maintain Mu DNA replication. Synthesis of specific Mu-encoded proteins was inhibited by infecting a host carrying a temperature-sensitive suppressor, at permissive temperature, with Mu amber phages, then shifting to nonpermissive temperature. When Aam phages were used, Mu DNA replication was inhibited with kinetics essentially identical to those with chloramphenicol addition; hence, it is likely that continued synthesis of the Mu A protein is required to maintain Mu DNA replication. The data suggest that the activity of the Mu A protein is unstable, and raise the possibility that the Mu A protein and other transposases may be used stoichiometrically rather than catalytically.     

The phage Mu transpososome core: DNA requirements for assembly and function.

The two chemical steps of phage Mu transpositional recombination, donor DNA cleavage and strand transfer, take place within higher order protein-DNA complexes called transpososomes. At the core of these complexes is a tetramer of MuA (the transposase), bound to the two ends of the Mu genome. While transpososome assembly normally requires a number of cofactors, under certain conditions only MuA and a short DNA fragment are required. DNA requirements for this process, as well as the stability and activity of the ensuing complexes, were established. The divalent cation normally required for assembly of the stable complex could be omitted if the substrate was prenicked, if the flanking DNA was very short or if the two flanking strands were non-complementary. The presence of a single nucleotide beyond the Mu genome end on the non-cut strand was critical for transpososome stability. Donor cleavage additionally required at least two flanking nucleotides on the strand to be cleaved. The flanking DNA double helix was destabilized, implying distortion of the DNA near the active site. Although donor cleavage required Mg2+, strand transfer took place in the presence of Ca2+ as well, suggesting a conformational difference in the active site for the two chemical steps.     

Bacteriophage Mu DNA replication in vitro

An in vitro system for bacteriophage Mu DNA replication using lysates on cellophane discs is described. Mu replication was monitored by DNA hybridization. Using a thermoinducible Mu lysogen, 30-50% of all DNA synthesis in vitro was Mu-specific. Mu DNA synthesis is semidiscontinuous. In the presence of the DNA ligase inhibitor NMN, about one-half of the DNA was in Okazaki pieces and one-half in large DNA. The Mu Okazaki pieces hybridized mainly to the Mu light strand; the large DNA hybridized mainly to the Mu heavy strand. Okazaki pieces isolated from uninfected cells also hybridized to 2000-3000 bases of host DNA present in Mu-separated strands. However, the host Okazaki pieces hybridize to both Mu strands symmetrically. Most, if not all, host sequences were represented in mature Mu viral DNA. The in vitro data are most consistent with models in which Mu sequences, oriented randomly in both directions in the host chromosome, have recruited a bacterial replisome which traverses the Mu genome from left to right.     

Host factors that promote transpososome disassembly and the PriA-PriC pathway for restart primosome assembly

Initiation of bacteriophage Mu DNA replication by transposition requires the disassembly of the transpososome that catalyses strand exchange and the assembly of a replisome promoted by PriA, PriB, PriC and DnaT proteins, which function in the host to restart stalled replication forks. Once the molecular chaperone ClpX weakens the very tight binding of the transpososome to the Mu ends, host disassembly factors (MRFalpha-DF) promote the dissociation of the transpososome from the DNA template and the assembly of a new nucleoprotein complex. Prereplisome factors (MRFalpha-PR) further alter the complex, allowing PriA binding and loading of major replicative helicase DnaB onto the template promoted by the restart proteins. MRFalpha-PR is essential for DnaB loading by restart proteins even on the deproteinized Mu fork whereas MRFalpha-DF is not required on the deproteinized template. When the transition from transpososome to replisome was reconstituted using MRFalpha-DF and MRFalpha-PR, initiation of Mu DNA replication was strictly dependent upon added PriC and PriA helicase. In contrast, initiation on the deproteinized template was predominantly dependent upon PriB and did not require PriA's helicase activity. The results indicate that transition mechanisms beginning with the transpososome disassembly can determine the pathway of replisome assembly by restart proteins.     

Mechanism of transposition of bacteriophage Mu: structure of a transposition intermediate

Mu transposition works efficiently in vitro and generates both cointegrate and simple insert products. We have examined the reaction products obtained under modified in vitro reaction conditions that do not permit efficient initiation of DNA replication. The major product is precisely the intermediate structure predicted from one of the current models of DNA transposition. Both cointegrates and simple inserts can be made in vitro using this intermediate as the DNA substrate, demonstrating that it is indeed a true transposition intermediate. The requirements for efficient formation of the intermediate include the Mu A protein, the Mu B protein, an unknown number of E. coli host proteins, ATP, and divalent cation. Only E. coli host proteins are required for conversion of the intermediate to cointegrate or simple insert products. Structures resulting from DNA strand transfer at only one end of the transposon are not observed, suggesting that the strand transfers at each end of the transposon are tightly coupled.     

MuB protein allosterically activates strand transfer by the transposase of phage Mu.

The MuA and MuB proteins collaborate to mediate efficient transposition of the phage Mu genome into many DNA target sites. MuA (the transposase) carries out all the DNA cleavage and joining steps. MuB stimulates strand transfer by activating the MuA-donor DNA complex through direct protein-protein contact. The C-terminal domain of MuA is required for this MuA-MuB interaction. Activation of strand transfer occurs irrespective of whether MuB is bound to target DNA. When high levels of MuA generate a pool of free MuB (not bound to DNA) or when chemical modification of MuB impairs its ability to bind DNA, MuB still stimulates strand transfer. However, under these conditions, intramolecular target sites are used exclusively because of their close proximity to the MuA-MuB-donor DNA complex.     

A new component of bacteriophage Mu replicative transposition machinery: the Escherichia coli ClpX protein

We have shown previously that some particular mutations in bacteriophage Mu repressor, the frameshift vir mutations, made the protein very sensitive to the Escherichia coli ATP-dependent Clp protease. This enzyme is formed by the association between a protease subunit (ClpP) and an ATPase subunit. ClpA, the best characterized of these ATPases, is not required for the degradation of the mutant Mu repressors. Recently, a new potential ClpP associated ATPase, ClpX, has been described. We show here that this new subunit is required for Mu vir repressor degradation. Moreover, ClpX (but not ClpP) was found to be required for normal Mu replication. Thus ClpX has activities that do not require its association with ClpP. In the pathway of Mu replicative transposition, the block resides beyond the strand transfer reaction, i.e. after the transposition reaction per se is completed, suggesting that ClpX is required for the transition to the formation of the active replication complex at one Mu end. This is a new clear-cut case of the versatile activity of polypeptides that form multi-component ATP-dependent proteases.     

Immunoelectron microscopic analysis of the A, B, and HU protein content of bacteriophage Mu transpososomes

Stable protein-DNA complexes or transpososomes mediate the Mu DNA strand transfer reaction in vitro (Surette, M. G., Buch, S. J., and Chaconas, G. (1987) Cell 49, 253-262; Craigie, R., and Mizuuchi, K. (1987) Cell 51, 493-501). Formation of the Type 1 complex, an intermediate in the strand transfer reaction, requires the Mu A and Escherichia coli HU proteins. Generation of the Type 2 complex, in which the Mu ends have been covalently linked to the target DNA, requires the Mu B protein, ATP, and target DNA in addition to A and HU. The protein content of these higher order synaptic complexes has been studied by immunoelectron microscopy using protein A-colloidal gold conjugates to visualize antibody-bound complexes. Under our in vitro transposition conditions, Type 1 complexes were found to contain A and HU; in addition, Type 2 complexes contained Mu B. However, both the HU and the Mu B protein were found to be loosely associated and could be quantitatively removed from the nucleoprotein core of both complexes by incubation in 0.5 M NaCl. Depletion of HU from the Type 1 complex did not affect the ability of this complex to be converted into the strand-transferred product. Hence, the indispensable role of the HU protein in the Mu DNA strand transfer reaction is limited to the formation of the Type 1 transpososome.     

Progressive structural transitions within Mu transpositional complexes

Assembly of the Mu transpososome is dependent on specific binding sites for the MuA transposase near the ends of the phage genome. MuA also contacts terminal nucleotides but only upon transpososome assembly, and base-specific recognition of the terminal nucleotides is critical for assembly. We show that Mu ends lacking the terminal 5 bp can form transpososomes, while longer DNA substrates with mutated terminal nucleotides cannot. The impact of the mutations can be suppressed by base mismatches near the end of Mu. Deletion of the flanking strands or mutation of the terminal nucleotides has differential effects on the cleavage and strand transfer reactions. These results show that the terminal nucleotides control the assembly and activation of transpososomes by influencing conformational changes around the active site.     

Duplex opening by primosome protein PriA for replisome assembly on a recombination intermediate.

PriA and other primosome assembly proteins of Escherichia coli recruit the major replicative helicase DnaB for replisome assembly during bacteriophage Mu transposition and replication. MuA transposase catalyzes the transfer of Mu ends to target DNA, forming a potential replication fork that provides the assembly site for the replisome. However, this fork lacks the single-stranded DNA needed to load DnaB. Although no pre-existing primosome assembly sites that bind PriA were found within the Mu end sequences, PriA was able to bind to the forked DNA structure created by MuA. The helicase activity of PriA could then open the duplex to create the DnaB binding site. In a tightly coupled reaction on synthetic forked substrates, PriA promoted both the unwinding of the lagging strand arm and preprimosome assembly to load DnaB onto the lagging strand template. PriA apparently translocated 3' to 5' along the lagging strand template until sufficient single-stranded DNA was exposed for binding of DnaB, which then translocated 5' to 3' in the opposite direction. Mutant PriA lacking helicase activity was unable to promote this process, and loss of PriA helicase impaired Mu DNA replication in vivo and in vitro. This suggests that the opening of the duplex by PriA helicase is a critical step in the initiation of Mu DNA replication. Concerted helicase and primosome assembly functions would allow PriA to act as initiator on recombination intermediates and stalled replication forks. As part of the replisome, PriA may act as a mobile initiator that minimizes interruptions in chromosomal replication.     

Inversion of the phosphate chirality at the target site of Mu DNA strand transfer: evidence for a one-step transesterification mechanism.

Central to transposition of phage Mu are two reactions mediated by the MuA protein. First, MuA introduces single-stranded cuts at the ends of the Mu DNA to generate 3' OH termini. In the subsequent strand-transfer step, the MuA-Mu DNA end complex cuts a target DNA and joins the Mu 3' ends to the 5' ends of the target. DNA containing chiral phosphorothioates was used to demonstrate inversion of the chirality during the course of strand transfer. This result strongly supports a one-step transesterification mechanism in which the 3' OH of the cleaved donor DNA is the attacking nucleophile. Furthermore, this donor 3' OH group was essential for target DNA cleavage. In contrast, during lambda integration the phosphate chirality was retained, as expected for a two-step transesterification involving a covalent protein-DNA intermediate.     

Solution structure of the Mu end DNA-binding ibeta subdomain of phage Mu transposase: modular DNA recognition by two tethered domains.

The phage Mu transposase (MuA) binds to the ends of the Mu genome during the assembly of higher order nucleoprotein complexes. We investigate the structure and function of the MuA end-binding domain (Ibetagamma). The three-dimensional solution structure of the Ibeta subdomain (residues 77-174) has been determined using multidimensional NMR spectroscopy. It comprises five alpha-helices, including a helix-turn-helix (HTH) DNA-binding motif formed by helices 3 and 4, and can be subdivided into two interacting structural elements. The structure has an elongated disc-like appearance from which protrudes the recognition helix of the HTH motif. The topology of helices 2-4 is very similar to that of helices 1-3 of the previously determined solution structure of the MuA Igamma subdomain and to that of the homeodomain family of HTH DNA-binding proteins. We show that each of the two subdomains binds to one half of the 22 bp recognition sequence, Ibeta to the more conserved Mu end distal half (beta subsite) and Igamma to the Mu end proximal half (gamma subsite) of the consensus Mu end-binding site. The complete Ibetagamma domain binds the recognition sequence with a 100- to 1000-fold higher affinity than the two subdomains independently, indicating a cooperative effect. Our results show that the Mu end DNA-binding domain of MuA has a modular organization, with each module acting on a specific part of the 22 bp binding site. Based on the present binding data and the structures of the Ibeta and Igamma subdomains, a model for the interaction of the complete Ibetagamma domain with DNA is proposed.     

Bacteriophage Mu transposase contains a fragment with primary structure similar to that of protein VPg covalently linked with poliovirus RNA

A statistically valid similarity was found to exist between the amino acid sequences of poliovirus genome-linked protein VPg and a fragment of bacteriophage Mu transposase (Mu A protein). Based on this observation a hypothesis is proposed that the molecular mechanisms underlying the functions of the two proteins may be analogous. Both proteins are supposed to be site-specific endonucleases which form covalent linkage with the 5'-phosphate group of the nicked DNA or RNA strand. The amino acid residue participating in the formation of this linkage in MuA is tentatively identified as Tyr413.     

A protein factor which reduces the negative supercoiling requirement in the Mu DNA strand transfer reaction is Escherichia coli integration host factor

We have examined the supercoiling requirement for the in vitro Mu DNA strand transfer reaction and found that optimal efficiency requires a high level (sigma = -0.06) of donor plasmid superhelicity. At in vivo levels of supercoiling (sigma = -0.025) the reaction does not occur. Using an unreactive donor plasmid with a near physiological level of supercoiling, we identified an Escherichia coli protein factor which has the novel property of reducing the donor plasmid supercoiling requirement for the in vitro Mu DNA strand transfer reaction by 40%. This protein, which we named supercoiling relief factor was purified to near homogeneity and found to be identical to integration host factor (IHF), a protein known to induce site specific bends in DNA. The dramatic reduction in the supercoiling requirement was promoted by about 1.5 IHF dimers/donor substrate molecule. At these low levels of IHF, the HU requirement for the reaction was also reduced; a synergistic effect of the two proteins resulted in a greater than 10-fold stimulation of the reaction under appropriate conditions. Furthermore, at high concentrations of IHF, HU could be completely eliminated from the reaction.     

Efficient Mu transposition requires interaction of transposase with a DNA sequence at the Mu operator: implications for regulation

Phage Mu transposition is initiated by the Mu DNA strand-transfer reaction, which generates a branched DNA structure that acts as a transposition intermediate. A critical step in this reaction is formation of a special synaptic DNA-protein complex called a plectosome. We find that formation of this complex involves, in addition to a pair of Mu end sequences, a third cis-acting sequence element, the internal activation sequence (IAS). The IAS is specifically recognized by the N-terminal domain of Mu transposase (MuA protein). Neither the N-terminal domain of MuA protein nor the IAS is required for later reaction steps. The IAS overlaps with the sequences to which Mu repressor protein binds in the Mu operator region; the Mu repressor directly inhibits the Mu DNA strand-transfer reaction by interfering with the interaction between MuA protein and the IAS, providing an additional mode of regulation by the repressor.     

Stimulation of the Mu DNA strand cleavage and intramolecular strand transfer reactions by the Mu B protein is independent of stable binding of the Mu B protein to DNA.

Interactions between the Mu A and Mu B proteins are important in the early steps of the in vitro transposition of a mini-Mu plasmid. We have examined these interactions by assaying Mu B stimulation of Mu A-mediated strand cleavage and strand transfer reactions. We have previously shown that in the presence of ATP the Mu B protein can stimulate the Mu A-directed cleavage reaction of mini-Mu plasmids carrying a terminal base pair mutation (Surette, M.G., Harkness, T., and Chaconas, G. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 3118-3124). Here we demonstrate that in the absence of a non-Mu DNA target molecule the Mu B protein stimulates intramolecular integration of a mini-Mu in an ATP-dependent fashion. Furthermore, modification of the Mu B protein with N-ethylmaleimide severely compromises the ability of B to form a stable complex with DNA; however, the modified protein stimulates the strand cleavage and intramolecular strand transfer reactions as efficiently as the untreated protein. These results indicate that the Mu B protein is capable of stimulating the Mu A protein through direct interaction in the absence of stable Mu B-DNA complex formation. Our results increase the spectrum of Mu B protein activities and uncouple the stimulatory properties of the Mu B protein from stable DNA binding but not the ATP cofactor requirement.     

Altering the DNA-binding specificity of Mu transposase in vitro.

We describe the isolation of a variant of Mu transposase (MuA protein) which can recognize altered att sites at the ends of Mu DNA. No prior knowledge of the structure of the DNA binding domain or its mode of interaction with att DNA was necessary to obtain this variant. Protein secondary structure programs initially helped target mutations to predicted helical regions within a subdomain of MuA demonstrated to harbor att DNA binding activity. Of the 54 mutant positions examined, only two showed decreased affinity for att DNA, while eight others affected assembly of the Mu transpososome. A variant impaired in DNA binding [MuA(R146V)], and predicted to be in the recognition helix of an HTH motif, was challenged with altered att sites created from degenerate oligonucleotides to select for novel DNA binding specificity. DNA sequences bound to MuA(R146V) were detected by gel-retardation, and following several steps of PCR amplification/enrichment, were identified by cloning and sequencing. The strategy allowed recovery of an altered att site for which MuA(R146V) showed higher affinity than for the wild-type site, although this site was bound by wild-type MuA as well. The altered association between MuA(R146V) and an altered att site target was competent in transposition. We discuss the strengths and limitations of this methodology, which has applications in dissecting the functional role of specific protein-DNA associations.     

The phiX174-type primosome promotes replisome assembly at the site of recombination in bacteriophage Mu transposition.

Initiation of Escherichia coli DNA synthesis primed by homologous recombination is believed to require the phiX174-type primosome, a mobile priming apparatus assembled without the initiator protein DnaA. We show that this primosome plays an essential role in bacteriophage Mu DNA replication by transposition. Upon promoting transfer of Mu ends to target DNA, the Mu transpososome undergoes transition to a pre-replisome that permits initiation of DNA synthesis only in the presence of primosome assembly proteins PriA, DnaT, DnaB and DnaC. These assembly proteins promote the engagement of primase and DNA polymerase III holoenzyme, initiating semi-discontinuous replication preferentially at the Mu left end. The results indicate that these proteins play a crucial role in promoting replisome assembly on a recombination intermediate.