The plastid-encoded protein Orf2971 is required for protein translocation and chloroplast quality control

Photosynthesis and the biosynthesis of many important metabolites occur in chloroplasts. In these semi-autonomous organelles, the chloroplast genome encodes approximately 100 proteins. The remaining chloroplast proteins, close to 3,000, are encoded by nuclear genes whose products are translated in the cytosol and imported into chloroplasts. However, there is still no consensus on the composition of the protein import machinery including its motor proteins and on how newly imported chloroplast proteins are refolded. In this study, we have examined the function of orf2971, the largest chloroplast gene of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. The depletion of Orf2971 causes the accumulation of protein precursors, partial proteolysis and aggregation of proteins, increased expression of chaperones and proteases, and autophagy. Orf2971 interacts with the TIC (translocon at the inner chloroplast envelope) complex, catalyzes ATP (adenosine triphosphate) hydrolysis, and associates with chaperones and chaperonins. We propose that Orf2971 is intimately connected to the protein import machinery and plays an important role in chloroplast protein quality control.

Repression of Orf2971 induces accumulation of chloroplast precursor proteins and impaired chloroplast quality indicating that Orf2971 is required for protein import and chloroplast quality control.

IN A NUTSHELL Background: The chloroplast is an important bioreactor as well as a photosynthetic site. Approximately 3,000 plastid proteins encoded in the nucleus are translocated into the chloroplast envelope via the TOC (translocon at the outer chloroplast envelope) and TIC machineries. Most nucleus-encoded preproteins that enter the plastid are unfolded as they traverse the TOC–TIC import complexes. To prevent these unfolded or misfolded proteins from causing chloroplast damage, a quality control mechanism comprising molecular chaperones and proteases ensures that all polypeptides entering chloroplasts are either correctly folded or degraded. However, there is still no consensus on the TIC complex’s components, motor proteins, or mechanism for refolding proteins entering the chloroplast. Question: What is the precise function of each of the proteins in the TIC complex? What is the composition of the chloroplast protein import machinery motor? How are the newly imported chloroplast proteins refolded and assembled into functional complexes? Findings: We found that Orf2971, encoded by the largest gene in the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplast genome and proposed to be an ortholog of Ycf2, is directly associated with the protein import machinery and plays a crucial role in ensuring the quality of proteins targeted to the chloroplast. Orf2971 deficiency induces protein precursor accumulation, partial proteolysis and protein aggregation, increased expression of chaperones and proteases, and autophagy. We hypothesize that Orf2971 is intimately linked to the protein import machinery and plays a critical role in chloroplast protein quality control. Next steps: The next challenge is to identify the sorting components associated with this complex on the stromal side. Furthermore, additional experimental evidence is required to investigate the relationship between different import machineries, including the analysis of the accumulation of precursor proteins in the various import mutants.     

Downregulation of ClpR2 leads to reduced accumulation of the ClpPRS protease complex and defects in chloroplast biogenesis in Arabidopsis

Plastids contain tetradecameric Clp protease core complexes, with five ClpP Ser-type proteases, four nonproteolytic ClpR, and two associated ClpS proteins. Accumulation of total ClpPRS complex decreased twofold to threefold in an Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA insertion mutant in CLPR2 designated clpr2-1. Differential stable isotope labeling of the ClpPRS complex with iTRAQ revealed a fivefold reduction in assembled ClpR2 accumulation and twofold to fivefold reductions in the other subunits. A ClpR2:(his)(6) fusion protein that incorporated into the chloroplast ClpPRS complex fully complemented clpr2-1. The reduced accumulation of the ClpPRS protease complex led to a pale-green phenotype with delayed shoot development, smaller chloroplasts, decreased thylakoid accumulation, and increased plastoglobule accumulation. Stromal ClpC1 and 2 were both recruited to the thylakoid surface in clpr2-1. The thylakoid membrane of clpr2-1 showed increased carotenoid content, partial inactivation of photosystem II, and upregulated thylakoid proteases and stromal chaperones, suggesting an imbalance in chloroplast protein homeostasis and a well-coordinated network of proteolysis and chaperone activities. Interestingly, a subpopulation of PsaF and several light-harvesting complex II proteins accumulated in the thylakoid with unprocessed chloroplast transit peptides. We conclude that ClpR2 cannot be functionally replaced by other ClpP/R homologues and that the ClpPRS complex is central to chloroplast biogenesis, thylakoid protein homeostasis, and plant development.     

Structural and functional insights into the chloroplast ATP-dependent Clp protease in Arabidopsis

In contrast with the model Escherichia coli Clp protease, the ATP-dependent Clp protease in higher plants has a remarkably diverse proteolytic core consisting of multiple ClpP and ClpR paralogs, presumably arranged within a dual heptameric ring structure. Using antisense lines for the nucleus-encoded ClpP subunit, ClpP6, we show that the Arabidopsis thaliana Clp protease is vital for chloroplast development and function. Repression of ClpP6 produced a proportional decrease in the Clp proteolytic core, causing a chlorotic phenotype in young leaves that lessened upon maturity. Structural analysis of the proteolytic core revealed two distinct subcomplexes that likely correspond to single heptameric rings, one containing the ClpP1 and ClpR1-4 proteins, the other containing ClpP3-6. Proteomic analysis revealed several stromal proteins more abundant in clpP6 antisense lines, suggesting that some are substrates for the Clp protease. A proteolytic assay developed for intact chloroplasts identified potential substrates for the stromal Clp protease in higher plants, most of which were more abundant in young Arabidopsis leaves, consistent with the severity of the chlorotic phenotype observed in the clpP6 antisense lines. The identified substrates all function in more general housekeeping roles such as plastid protein synthesis, folding, and quality control, rather than in metabolic activities such as photosynthesis.     

Mycobacterium tuberculosis ClpP1 and ClpP2 Function Together in Protein Degradation and Are Required for Viability in vitro and During Infection

In most bacteria, Clp protease is a conserved, non-essential serine protease that regulates the response to various stresses. Mycobacteria, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and Mycobacterium smegmatis, unlike most well studied prokaryotes, encode two ClpP homologs, ClpP1 and ClpP2, in a single operon. Here we demonstrate that the two proteins form a mixed complex (ClpP1P2) in mycobacteria. Using two different approaches, promoter replacement, and a novel system of inducible protein degradation, leading to inducible expression of clpP1 and clpP2, we demonstrate that both genes are essential for growth and that a marked depletion of either one results in rapid bacterial death. ClpP1P2 protease appears important in degrading missense and prematurely terminated peptides, as partial depletion of ClpP2 reduced growth specifically in the presence of antibiotics that increase errors in translation. We further show that the ClpP1P2 protease is required for the degradation of proteins tagged with the SsrA motif, a tag co-translationally added to incomplete protein products. Using active site mutants of ClpP1 and ClpP2, we show that the activity of each subunit is required for proteolysis, for normal growth of Mtb in vitro and during infection of mice. These observations suggest that the Clp protease plays an unusual and essential role in Mtb and may serve as an ideal target for antimycobacterial therapy.     

The chloroplast protease subunit ClpP4 is a substrate of the E3 ligase AtCHIP and plays an important role in chloroplast function

Animal CHIP proteins are chaperone-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligases that physically interact with Hsp70, Hsp90 and proteasome, promoting degradation of a selective group of non-native or damaged proteins in animal cells. The plant CHIP-like protein, AtCHIP, also plays important roles in protein turnover metabolism. AtCHIP interacts with a proteolytic subunit, ClpP4, of the chloroplast Clp protease in vivo, and ubiquitylates ClpP4 in vitro. The steady-state level of ClpP4 is reduced in AtCHIP-overexpressing plants under high-intensity light conditions, suggesting that AtCHIP targets ClpP4 for degradation and thereby regulates the Clp proteolytic activity in chloroplasts under certain stress conditions. Overexpression of ClpP4 in Arabidopsis leads to chlorotic phenotypes in transgenic plants, and chloroplast structures in the chlorotic tissues of ClpP4-overexpressing plants are abnormal and largely devoid of thylakoid membranes, suggesting that ClpP4 plays a critical role in chloroplast structure and function. As AtCHIP is a cytosolic protein that has been shown to play an important role in regulating an essential chloroplast protease, this research provides new insights into the regulatory networks controlling protein turnover catabolism in chloroplasts.     

Recent structural insights into the mechanism of ClpP protease regulation by AAA+ chaperones and small molecules

ClpP is a highly conserved serine protease that is a critical enzyme in maintaining protein homeostasis and is an important drug target in pathogenic bacteria and various cancers. In its functional form, ClpP is a self-compartmentalizing protease composed of two stacked heptameric rings that allow protein degradation to occur within the catalytic chamber. ATPase chaperones such as ClpX and ClpA are hexameric ATPases that form larger complexes with ClpP and are responsible for the selection and unfolding of protein substrates prior to their degradation by ClpP. Although individual structures of ClpP and ATPase chaperones have offered mechanistic insights into their function and regulation, their structures together as a complex have only been recently determined to high resolution. Here, we discuss the cryoelectron microscopy structures of ClpP-ATPase complexes and describe findings previously inaccessible from individual Clp structures, including how a hexameric ATPase and a tetradecameric ClpP protease work together in a functional complex. We then discuss the consensus mechanism for substrate unfolding and translocation derived from these structures, consider alternative mechanisms, and present their strengths and limitations. Finally, new insights into the allosteric control of ClpP gained from studies using small molecules and gain or loss-of-function mutations are explored. Overall, this review aims to underscore the multilayered regulation of ClpP that may present novel ideas for structure-based drug design.     

Large Scale Comparative Proteomics of a Chloroplast Clp Protease Mutant Reveals Folding Stress, Altered Protein Homeostasis, and Feedback Regulation of Metabolism

The clpr2-1 mutant is delayed in development due to reduction of the chloroplast ClpPR protease complex. To understand the role of Clp proteases in plastid biogenesis and homeostasis, leaf proteomes of young seedlings of clpr2-1 and wild type were compared using large scale mass spectrometry-based quantification using an LTQ-Orbitrap and spectral counting with significance determined by G-tests. Virtually only chloroplast-localized proteins were significantly affected, indicating that the molecular phenotype was confined to the chloroplast. A comparative chloroplast stromal proteome analysis of fully developed plants was used to complement the data set. Chloroplast unfoldase ClpB3 was strongly up-regulated in both young and mature leaves, suggesting widespread and persistent protein folding stress. The importance of ClpB3 in the clp2-1 mutant was demonstrated by the observation that a CLPR2 and CLPB3 double mutant was seedling-lethal. The observed up-regulation of chloroplast chaperones and protein sorting components further illustrated destabilization of protein homeostasis. Delayed rRNA processing and up-regulation of a chloroplast DEAD box RNA helicase and polynucleotide phosphorylase, but no significant change in accumulation of ribosomal subunits, suggested a bottleneck in ribosome assembly or RNA metabolism. Strong up-regulation of a chloroplast translational regulator TypA/BipA GTPase suggested a specific response in plastid gene expression to the distorted homeostasis. The stromal proteases PreP1,2 were up-regulated, likely constituting compensation for reduced Clp protease activity and possibly shared substrates between the ClpP and PreP protease systems. The thylakoid photosynthetic apparatus was decreased in the seedlings, whereas several structural thylakoid-associated plastoglobular proteins were strongly up-regulated. Two thylakoid-associated reductases involved in isoprenoid and chlorophyll synthesis were up-regulated reflecting feedback from rate-limiting photosynthetic electron transport. We discuss the quantitative proteomics data and the role of Clp proteolysis using a “systems view” of chloroplast homeostasis and metabolism and provide testable hypotheses and putative substrates to further determine the significance of Clp-driven proteolysis.Intracellular proteolysis is important for regulation of metabolic and signaling pathways as well as protein homeostasis and viability of cells and organelles. Chloroplasts contain multiple soluble and membrane-bound proteases and processing peptidases (1) presumably with partially overlapping substrates. These include stromal processing peptidase (2) and stromal PreP1,2 involved in degradation of cleaved transit peptides (3); various amino peptidases (4, 5); the thylakoid processing peptidases cTPA (6), TPP (7), and thylakoid/envelope signal peptidase I (8); and thylakoid-bound proteases SppA (9) and Egy1 (10) as well as stromal and thylakoid members of the Deg, FtsH, and Clp families (11–13). Together with several chaperone systems, including CPN60/CPN10, HSP70/DnaJ, HSP90, and ClpB3 (14), these proteases are part of the chloroplast protein homeostasis network. Importantly the connectivity and overlap of proteins within this homeostasis network is poorly understood; in particular it is unclear how protease substrates are recognized by the different proteolytic systems. Several suppressors of variegated FtsH protease mutants in Arabidopsis have elegantly demonstrated that the balance between protein synthesis and degradation plays an important role in chloroplast homeostasis (15–17). Comparative proteome analysis of chloroplast homeostasis mutants will provide insights in this homeostasis network as we recently showed for a protein sorting mutant (18), and it will identify candidate protease substrates.The Clp proteins form the largest plastid localized protease family with five serine-type ClpP (P1,P3–6) proteases, four non-catalytic ClpR (R1–4) proteins, three Clp AAA⁺ chaperones (C1,C2, and D), and several additional members (ClpT1,T2,S) with unknown functions (1, 13, 19). We note that we renamed Arabidopsis ClpS1,S2 and ClpT as ClpT1,T2 and ClpS to be consistent with the Escherichia coli nomenclature for ClpS (20). The ClpR proteins lack the three catalytic amino acid residues that are conserved across ClpP proteins (21). All proteins of the Arabidopsis Clp proteolytic system have been identified by mass spectrometry (13), including a potential substrate affinity regulator, ClpS.¹Recent evidence shows that the Clp proteolytic system plays a critical role in plant growth, development, and protein homeostasis. ClpP1 is plastid-encoded and was shown to be essential for shoot development in tobacco (22, 23). Down-regulation of the plastid-encoded CLPP1 gene in the green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii suggested that ClpP1 is involved in the degradation of the thylakoid-bound subunits of cytochrome b₆f and photosystem II (PSII)² complex (24, 25). Arabidopsis mutant clpr1-1 carries a premature stop codon in the CLPR1 gene and showed a virescent phenotype and delayed chloroplast development and differentiation (26). Maturation of 23 and 4.5 S chloroplast ribosomal RNA (rRNA) is delayed in clpr1-1 (26), but it is not clear how this is related to the loss of ClpR1 protein. Phenotypes of Arabidopsis antisense lines against CLPP4 (27) and CLPP6 (28) also showed delayed chloroplast and plant development as well as reduced accumulation of other ClpP,R subunits. Based on two-dimensional gel analysis, several chloroplast proteins were suggested to be substrates of the Clp machinery (28–30), but direct evidence is lacking. A null mutant for the CLPC1 chaperone (also named HSP93-V) resulted in reduced plant growth, chloroplast development, and protein import rates, but homozygous plants are autotrophic and seeds are viable (31–33). A null mutant for chaperone CLPC2 has no visible phenotype, whereas lack of both CLPC1 and CLPC2 prevents embryogenesis (34). Interestingly ClpC1 is also involved in accumulation of chlorophyll a oxygenase, which is responsible for conversion of chlorophyll a to chlorophyll b (35).In a previous study, we identified and characterized a T-DNA-tagged Arabidopsis thaliana mutant with reduced expression of CLPR2; this mutant was named clpr2-1 (36). Accumulation of the assembled 325-kDa ClpPRT complex was 2–3-fold reduced and resulted in delayed chloroplast and plant development with small chloroplasts and a pale green phenotype. The clpr2-1 mutant shows the strongest visible phenotype when seedlings are young. To better understand the role of the Clp machinery in chloroplast biogenesis and homeostasis and to discover potential Clp substrates, a comprehensive proteome analysis at different points in leaf development of the clpr2-1 mutant is presented in the current study. The methods to quantitatively analyze differences in protein accumulation have greatly improved over the last decade and have shifted from gel image-based quantification to quantification within the mass spectrometer (37–39). Taking advantage of these new developments and opportunities, we compared the leaf proteome of clpr2-1 and wt seedlings early in development using spectral counting. This was complemented with a comparative analysis of the chloroplast soluble proteome of fully developed leaf rosettes. The seedling proteome analysis showed that the strongest effects occurred within the chloroplast. The functional significance of one of the most up-regulated proteins, ClpB3, was confirmed by additional mutant analysis. Putative substrates for the Clp system suggested in recent studies (28–30, 35) are reviewed in the context of our findings. This study provides testable hypotheses to further determine the significance of Clp-driven proteolysis and provides new insights in the plastid protein homeostasis network and how secondary metabolism is intertwined with photosynthetic capacity. We show that a systems view of chloroplast biogenesis and proteome homeostasis is needed to identify putative protease substrates and to understand the role of proteolysis in chloroplast biology. Finally we believe that the experimental setup described in this study provides an attractive template for comparative proteome analysis of other (chloroplast) mutants.     

The Mycobacterium tuberculosis ClpP1P2 Protease Interacts Asymmetrically with Its ATPase Partners ClpX and ClpC1

Clp chaperone-proteases are cylindrical complexes built from ATP-dependent chaperone rings that stack onto a proteolytic ClpP double-ring core to carry out substrate protein degradation. Interaction of the ClpP particle with the chaperone is mediated by an N-terminal loop and a hydrophobic surface patch on the ClpP ring surface. In contrast to E. coli, Mycobacterium tuberculosis harbors not only one but two ClpP protease subunits, ClpP1 and ClpP2, and a homo-heptameric ring of each assembles to form the ClpP1P2 double-ring core. Consequently, this hetero double-ring presents two different potential binding surfaces for the interaction with the chaperones ClpX and ClpC1. To investigate whether ClpX or ClpC1 might preferentially interact with one or the other double-ring face, we mutated the hydrophobic chaperone-interaction patch on either ClpP1 or ClpP2, generating ClpP1P2 particles that are defective in one of the two binding patches and thereby in their ability to interact with their chaperone partners. Using chaperone-mediated degradation of ssrA-tagged model substrates, we show that both Mycobacterium tuberculosis Clp chaperones require the intact interaction face of ClpP2 to support degradation, resulting in an asymmetric complex where chaperones only bind to the ClpP2 side of the proteolytic core. This sets the Clp proteases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and probably other Actinobacteria, apart from the well-studied E. coli system, where chaperones bind to both sides of the protease core, and it frees the ClpP1 interaction interface for putative new binding partners.     

The Clp chaperones and proteases of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum

The Clp chaperones and proteases play an important role in protein homeostasis in the cell. They are highly conserved across prokaryotes and found also in the mitochondria of eukaryotes and the chloroplasts of plants. They function mainly in the disaggregation, unfolding and degradation of native as well as misfolded proteins. Here, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the Clp chaperones and proteases in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. The parasite contains four Clp ATPases, which we term PfClpB1, PfClpB2, PfClpC and PfClpM. One PfClpP, the proteolytic subunit, and one PfClpR, which is an inactive version of the protease, were also identified. Expression of all Clp chaperones and proteases was confirmed in blood-stage parasites. The proteins were localized to the apicoplast, a non-photosynthetic organelle that accommodates several important metabolic pathways in P. falciparum, with the exception of PfClpB2 (also known as Hsp101), which was found in the parasitophorous vacuole. Both PfClpP and PfClpR form mostly homoheptameric rings as observed by size-exclusion chromatography, analytical ultracentrifugation and electron microscopy. The X-ray structure of PfClpP showed the protein as a compacted tetradecamer similar to that observed for Streptococcus pneumoniae and Mycobacterium tuberculosis ClpPs. Our data suggest the presence of a ClpCRP complex in the apicoplast of P. falciparum.     

Subunit stoichiometry, evolution, and functional implications of an asymmetric plant plastid ClpP/R protease complex in Arabidopsis

The caseinolytic protease (Clp) protease system has been expanded in plant plastids compared with its prokaryotic progenitors. The plastid Clp core protease consists of five different proteolytic ClpP proteins and four different noncatalytic ClpR proteins, with each present in one or more copies and organized in two heptameric rings. We determined the exact subunit composition and stoichiometry for the intact core and each ring. The chloroplast ClpP/R protease was affinity purified from clpr4 and clpp3 Arabidopsis thaliana null mutants complemented with C-terminal StrepII-tagged versions of CLPR4 and CLPP3, respectively. The subunit stoichiometry was determined by mass spectrometry-based absolute quantification using stable isotope-labeled proteotypic peptides generated from a synthetic gene. One heptameric ring contained ClpP3,4,5,6 in a 1:2:3:1 ratio. The other ring contained ClpP1 and ClpR1,2,3,4 in a 3:1:1:1:1 ratio, resulting in only three catalytic sites. These ClpP1/R1-4 proteins are most closely related to the two subunits of the cyanobacterial P3/R complex and the identical P:R ratio suggests conserved adaptation. Furthermore, the plant-specific C-terminal extensions of the ClpP/R subunits were not proteolytically removed upon assembly, suggesting a regulatory role in Clp chaperone interaction. These results will now allow testing ClpP/R structure-function relationships using rationale design. The quantification workflow we have designed is applicable to other protein complexes.     

Clp protease complexes from photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic plastids and mitochondria of plants, their predicted three-dimensional structures, and functional implications

Tetradecameric Clp protease core complexes in non-photosynthetic plastids of roots, flower petals, and in chloroplasts of leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana were purified based on native mass and isoelectric point and identified by mass spectrometry. The stoichiometry between the subunits was determined. The protease complex consisted of one to three copies of five different serine-type protease Clp proteins (ClpP1,3-6) and four non-proteolytic ClpR proteins (ClpR1-4). Three-dimensional homology modeling showed that the ClpP/R proteins fit well together in a tetradecameric complex and also indicated unique contributions for each protein. Lateral exit gates for proteolysis products are proposed. In addition, ClpS1,2, unique to land plants, tightly interacted with this core complex, with one copy of each per complex. The three-dimensional modeling show that they do fit well on the axial sites of the ClpPR cores. In contrast to plastids, plant mitochondria contained a single approximately 320-kDa homo-tetradecameric ClpP2 complex, without association of ClpR or ClpS proteins. It is surprising that the Clp core composition appears identical in all three plastid types, despite the remarkable differences in plastid proteome composition. This suggests that regulation of plastid proteolysis by the Clp machinery is not through differential regulation of ClpP/R/S gene expression, but rather through substrate recognition mechanisms and regulated interaction of chaperone-like molecules (ClpS1,2 and others) to the ClpP/R core.     

Identification of new protein substrates for the chloroplast ATP-dependent Clp protease supports its constitutive role in Arabidopsis

The ATP-dependent Clp protease in plant chloroplasts consists of a heterogeneous proteolytic core containing multiple ClpP and ClpR paralogues. In this study, we have examined in detail the only viable knockout mutant to date of one of these subunits in Arabidopsis thaliana, ClpR1. Loss of ClpR1 caused a slow-growth phenotype, with chlorotic leaves during early development that later partially recovered upon maturity. Analysis of the Clp proteolytic core in the clpR1 mutant (clpR1-1) revealed approx. 10% of the wild-type levels remaining, probably due to a relative increase in the closely related ClpR3 protein and its partial substitution of ClpR1 in the core complex. A proteomic approach using an in organello proteolytic assay revealed 19 new potential substrates for the chloroplast Clp protease. Many of these substrates were constitutive enzymes involved in different metabolic pathways, including photosynthetic carbon fixation, nitrogen metabolism and chlorophyll/haem biosynthesis, whereas others function in housekeeping roles such as RNA maturation, protein synthesis and maturation, and recycling processes. In contrast, degradation of the stress-related chloroplast proteins Hsp21 (heat-shock protein 21) and lipoxygenase 2 was unaffected in the clpR1-1 line and thus not facilitated by the Clp protease. Overall, we show that the chloroplast Clp protease is principally a constitutive enzyme that degrades numerous stromal proteins, a feature that almost certainly underlies its vital importance for chloroplast function and plant viability.