Spore Density Determines Infection Strategy by the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina

Necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens are resisted by different plant defenses. While necrotrophic pathogens are sensitive to jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent resistance, biotrophic pathogens are resisted by salicylic acid (SA)- and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent resistance. Although many pathogens switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy during infection, little is known about the signals triggering this transition. This study is based on the observation that the early colonization pattern and symptom development by the ascomycete pathogen Plectosphaerella cucumerina (P. cucumerina) vary between inoculation methods. Using the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) defense response as a proxy for infection strategy, we examined whether P. cucumerina alternates between hemibiotrophic and necrotrophic lifestyles, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf surface. Untargeted metabolome analysis revealed profound differences in metabolic defense signatures upon different inoculation methods. Quantification of JA and SA, marker gene expression, and cell death confirmed that infection from high spore densities activates JA-dependent defenses with excessive cell death, while infection from low spore densities induces SA-dependent defenses with lower levels of cell death. Phenotyping of Arabidopsis mutants in JA, SA, and ROS signaling confirmed that P. cucumerina is differentially resisted by JA- and SA/ROS-dependent defenses, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf. Furthermore, in situ staining for early callose deposition at the infection sites revealed that necrotrophy by P. cucumerina is associated with elevated host defense. We conclude that P. cucumerina adapts to early-acting plant defenses by switching from a hemibiotrophic to a necrotrophic infection program, thereby gaining an advantage of immunity-related cell death in the host.Plant pathogens are often classified as necrotrophic or biotrophic, depending on their infection strategy (Glazebrook, 2005; Nishimura and Dangl, 2010). Necrotrophic pathogens kill living host cells and use the decayed plant tissue as a substrate to colonize the plant, whereas biotrophic pathogens parasitize living plant cells by employing effector molecules that suppress the host immune system (Pel and Pieterse, 2013). Despite this binary classification, the majority of pathogenic microbes employ a hemibiotrophic infection strategy, which is characterized by an initial biotrophic phase followed by a necrotrophic infection strategy at later stages of infection (Perfect and Green, 2001). The pathogenic fungi Magnaporthe grisea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and Mycosphaerella graminicola, the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, and the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae are examples of hemibiotrophic plant pathogens (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011; van Kan et al., 2014; Kabbage et al., 2015).Despite considerable progress in our understanding of plant resistance to necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens (Glazebrook, 2005; Mengiste, 2012; Lai and Mengiste, 2013), recent debate highlights the dynamic and complex interplay between plant-pathogenic microbes and their hosts, which is raising concerns about the use of infection strategies as a static tool to classify plant pathogens. For instance, the fungal genus Botrytis is often labeled as an archetypal necrotroph, even though there is evidence that it can behave as an endophytic fungus with a biotrophic lifestyle (van Kan et al., 2014). The rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, which is often classified as a hemibiotrophic leaf pathogen (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011), can adopt a purely biotrophic lifestyle when infecting root tissues (Marcel et al., 2010). It remains unclear which signals are responsible for the switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy and whether these signals rely solely on the physiological state of the pathogen, or whether host-derived signals play a role as well (Kabbage et al., 2015).The plant hormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) play a central role in the activation of plant defenses (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012). The first evidence that biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens are resisted by different immune responses came from Thomma et al. (1998), who demonstrated that Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genotypes impaired in SA signaling show enhanced susceptibility to the biotrophic pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (formerly known as Peronospora parastitica), while JA-insensitive genotypes were more susceptible to the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria brassicicola. In subsequent years, the differential effectiveness of SA- and JA-dependent defense mechanisms has been confirmed in different plant-pathogen interactions, while additional plant hormones, such as ethylene, abscisic acid (ABA), auxins, and cytokinins, have emerged as regulators of SA- and JA-dependent defenses (Bari and Jones, 2009; Cao et al., 2011; Pieterse et al., 2012). Moreover, SA- and JA-dependent defense pathways have been shown to act antagonistically on each other, which allows plants to prioritize an appropriate defense response to attack by biotrophic pathogens, necrotrophic pathogens, or herbivores (Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008; Pieterse et al., 2009; Verhage et al., 2010).In addition to plant hormones, reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important regulatory role in plant defenses (Torres et al., 2006; Lehmann et al., 2015). Within minutes after the perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns, NADPH oxidases and apoplastic peroxidases generate early ROS bursts (Torres et al., 2002; Daudi et al., 2012; O’Brien et al., 2012), which activate downstream defense signaling cascades (Apel and Hirt, 2004; Torres et al., 2006; Miller et al., 2009; Mittler et al., 2011; Lehmann et al., 2015). ROS play an important regulatory role in the deposition of callose (Luna et al., 2011; Pastor et al., 2013) and can also stimulate SA-dependent defenses (Chaouch et al., 2010; Yun and Chen, 2011; Wang et al., 2014; Mammarella et al., 2015). However, the spread of SA-induced apoptosis during hyperstimulation of the plant immune system is contained by the ROS-generating NADPH oxidase RBOHD (Torres et al., 2005), presumably to allow for the sufficient generation of SA-dependent defense signals from living cells that are adjacent to apoptotic cells. Nitric oxide (NO) plays an additional role in the regulation of SA/ROS-dependent defense (Trapet et al., 2015). This gaseous molecule can stimulate ROS production and cell death in the absence of SA while preventing excessive ROS production at high cellular SA levels via S-nitrosylation of RBOHD (Yun et al., 2011). Recently, it was shown that pathogen-induced accumulation of NO and ROS promotes the production of azelaic acid, a lipid derivative that primes distal plants for SA-dependent defenses (Wang et al., 2014). Hence, NO, ROS, and SA are intertwined in a complex regulatory network to mount local and systemic resistance against biotrophic pathogens. Interestingly, pathogens with a necrotrophic lifestyle can benefit from ROS/SA-dependent defenses and associated cell death (Govrin and Levine, 2000). For instance, Kabbage et al. (2013) demonstrated that S. sclerotiorum utilizes oxalic acid to repress oxidative defense signaling during initial biotrophic colonization, but it stimulates apoptosis at later stages to advance necrotrophic colonization. Moreover, SA-induced repression of JA-dependent resistance not only benefits necrotrophic pathogens but also hemibiotrophic pathogens after having switched from biotrophy to necrotrophy (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012).Plectosphaerella cucumerina ((P. cucumerina, anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) is a filamentous ascomycete fungus that can survive saprophytically in soil by decomposing plant material (Palm et al., 1995). The fungus can cause sudden death and blight disease in a variety of crops (Chen et al., 1999; Harrington et al., 2000). Because P. cucumerina can infect Arabidopsis leaves, the P. cucumerina-Arabidopsis interaction has emerged as a popular model system in which to study plant defense reactions to necrotrophic fungi (Berrocal-Lobo et al., 2002; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Carlucci et al., 2012; Ramos et al., 2013). Various studies have shown that Arabidopsis deploys a wide range of inducible defense strategies against P. cucumerina, including JA-, SA-, ABA-, and auxin-dependent defenses, glucosinolates (Tierens et al., 2001; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014), callose deposition (García-Andrade et al., 2011; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012), and ROS (Tierens et al., 2002; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Barna et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Recent metabolomics studies have revealed large-scale metabolic changes in P. cucumerina-infected Arabidopsis, presumably to mobilize chemical defenses (Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Furthermore, various chemical agents have been reported to induce resistance against P. cucumerina. These chemicals include β-amino-butyric acid, which primes callose deposition and SA-dependent defenses, benzothiadiazole (BTH or Bion; Görlach et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), which activates SA-related defenses (Lawton et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Gamir et al., 2014; Luna et al., 2014), JA (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), and ABA, which primes ROS and callose deposition (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Pastor et al., 2013). However, among all these studies, there is increasing controversy about the exact signaling pathways and defense responses contributing to plant resistance against P. cucumerina. While it is clear that JA and ethylene contribute to basal resistance against the fungus, the exact roles of SA, ABA, and ROS in P. cucumerina resistance vary between studies (Thomma et al., 1998; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2014).This study is based on the observation that the disease phenotype during P. cucumerina infection differs according to the inoculation method used. We provide evidence that the fungus follows a hemibiotrophic infection strategy when infecting from relatively low spore densities on the leaf surface. By contrast, when challenged by localized host defense to relatively high spore densities, the fungus switches to a necrotrophic infection program. Our study has uncovered a novel strategy by which plant-pathogenic fungi can take advantage of the early immune response in the host plant.     

Auxin Resistant1 and PIN-FORMED2 Protect Lateral Root Formation in Arabidopsis under Iron Stress

A stunted root system is a significant symptom of iron (Fe) toxicity, yet little is known about the effects of excess Fe on lateral root (LR) development. In this work, we show that excess Fe has different effects on LR development in different portions of the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) root system and that inhibitory effects on the LR initiation are only seen in roots newly formed during excess Fe exposure. We show that root tip contact with Fe is both necessary and sufficient for LR inhibition and that the auxin, but not abscisic acid, pathway is engaged centrally in the initial stages of excess Fe exposure. Furthermore, Fe stress significantly reduced PIN-FORMED2 (PIN2)-green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression in root tips, and pin2-1 mutants exhibited significantly fewer LR initiation events under excess Fe than the wild type. Exogenous application of both Fe and glutathione together increased PIN2-GFP expression and the number of LR initiation events compared with Fe treatment alone. The ethylene inhibitor aminoethoxyvinyl-glycine intensified Fe-dependent inhibition of LR formation in the wild type, and this inhibition was significantly reduced in the ethylene overproduction mutant ethylene overproducer1-1. We show that Auxin Resistant1 (AUX1) is a critical component in the mediation of endogenous ethylene effects on LR formation under excess Fe stress. Our findings demonstrate the relationship between excess Fe-dependent PIN2 expression and LR formation and the potential role of AUX1 in ethylene-mediated LR tolerance and suggest that AUX1 and PIN2 protect LR formation in Arabidopsis during the early stages of Fe stress.Iron (Fe) is an essential trace element for plants (Pilon et al., 2009), and species differ greatly in how much Fe they require for optimal growth (Wheeler and Power, 1995; Batty and Younger, 2003). As Fe is frequently limiting, Fe deficiency is more commonly studied than toxicity arising from excess Fe exposure (Lei et al., 2014; Bashir et al., 2015; Briat et al., 2015). Fe is also a major focus for efforts in biofortification by targeting Fe transporters (Zhai et al., 2014; Pinto and Ferreira, 2015). However, the excessive presence of Fe in soils is equally common, in particular in soils characterized by low pH and hypoxic or anoxic conditions (Connolly and Guerinot, 2002). Toxicity arising from excess Fe exposure is recognized as one of the major plant diseases attributable to abiotic factors that impact the development and yield potential in the world’s leading cereal crops, rice (Oryza sativa) and wheat (Triticum aestivum; Becker and Asch, 2005; Khabaz-Saberi et al., 2012). Understanding the mechanisms underlying excess Fe toxicity is therefore essential.Plastic responses in the plant’s root system architecture are known to constitute a major mechanism by which plants cope with fluctuating environments. Lateral roots (LRs), which typically comprise the majority of the root system, contribute pivotally to nutrient acquisition from soil, and modulating LR development is a very important avoidance strategy for plants when confronted with unfavorable edaphic conditions, such as high salinity or heavy metals (Ivanov et al., 2003). In the case of excess exposure to Fe, stunting of the root system is among the chief symptoms of toxicity (Becker and Asch, 2005). However, while some information has been emerging on the primary root axis (Li et al., 2015), the specific role of the plant’s LR apparatus remains poorly studied. Yamauchi and Peng (1995) reported retardation of root growth and a reduction in LR length and number under excess Fe conditions. Recently, Reyt et al. (2015) showed that excess Fe had no significant effect on LR initiation in the LR branching zone and that ferritins play an important role in LR emergence under excess Fe in this portion of the root, although the authors had not investigated LR development in the root portions near the growing tip of the primary root. Because LR initiation is restricted to specific pericycle cell files adjacent to a xylem pole in the basal region of the meristem (De Smet et al., 2007; Fukaki and Tasaka, 2009), and LR formation in this new growing root portion may be more susceptible to stress stimuli, such as observed with exposure to high NH₄⁺ and salt (Duan et al., 2013; Li et al., 2013), it is reasonable to suggest that modulation of LR formation near the growing tip of the primary root is critical to the response to excess Fe stress.In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), the development of LRs proceeds through the following stages: lateral root primordia (LRP) initiation, establishment, emergence, activation into mature LRs, and final maintenance of LR elongation (Fukaki and Tasaka, 2009; Péret et al., 2009). The hormones abscisic acid (ABA) and auxin are important internal negative and positive regulators during LR development, respectively (Fukaki and Tasaka, 2009). ABA has been implicated in LRP emergence and meristem activation independent of auxin (De Smet et al., 2003). Auxin is an important internal positive regulator during LR development (Fukaki and Tasaka, 2009), and auxin transport is critical (Blilou et al., 2005). Mutants in auxin efflux carriers such as PIN-FORMED (PIN) and P-Glycoprotein show significant defects in LR formation (Fukaki and Tasaka, 2009; Péret et al., 2009). For example, LR initiation frequency was significantly reduced in pin2 and pin3 mutants (Dubrovsky et al., 2009), and PIN2 was also shown to be involved in exogenous and endogenous signal-mediated LR development (by brassinosteroid, jasmonate, and fungal challenge; Li et al., 2005; Felten et al., 2009; Sun et al., 2009). Similarly, Auxin Resistant1 (AUX1), an auxin influx carrier, also regulates LRP positioning and initiation (De Smet et al., 2007). While both AUX1 and PIN2 are required specifically for the basipetal transport of auxin through the outer root cell layers (Fukaki and Tasaka, 2009), PIN1 localized at the basal end of vascular cells is responsible for direct acropetal auxin flow in the root stele (Blilou et al., 2005). Recently, the roles of ethylene on LR development have also been highlighted, and the ethylene-mediated LR formation is dependent on the auxin pathway (Ivanchenko et al., 2008; Lewis et al., 2011). Ethylene treatment could mediate fluorescence of AUX1 and PIN2 fluorescent protein fusions at the root tip (Růzicka et al., 2007; Lewis et al., 2011). Although ABA, auxin, and ethylene signals have been implicated as important for LR development, it is not known whether and how the three hormones are involved in the response of LR formation to Fe stress.The previously described phenotypes and physiological processes related to Fe toxicity do not clarify the effect of excess Fe on LR formation. In this study, we employed the Arabidopsis wild type and ABA-, auxin-, and ethylene-related mutants to explore the LR formation response to Fe toxicity and to elucidate the roles of ABA, auxin, and ethylene. Potential mechanisms involved in the early stress response to Fe stress are discussed.     

Salt Stress Reduces Root Meristem Size by Nitric Oxide-Mediated Modulation of Auxin Accumulation and Signaling in Arabidopsis

The development of the plant root system is highly plastic, which allows the plant to adapt to various environmental stresses. Salt stress inhibits root elongation by reducing the size of the root meristem. However, the mechanism underlying this process remains unclear. In this study, we explored whether and how auxin and nitric oxide (NO) are involved in salt-mediated inhibition of root meristem growth in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) using physiological, pharmacological, and genetic approaches. We found that salt stress significantly reduced root meristem size by down-regulating the expression of PINFORMED (PIN) genes, thereby reducing auxin levels. In addition, salt stress promoted AUXIN RESISTANT3 (AXR3)/INDOLE-3-ACETIC ACID17 (IAA17) stabilization, which repressed auxin signaling during this process. Furthermore, salt stress stimulated NO accumulation, whereas blocking NO production with the inhibitor N^ω-nitro-l-arginine-methylester compromised the salt-mediated reduction of root meristem size, PIN down-regulation, and stabilization of AXR3/IAA17, indicating that NO is involved in salt-mediated inhibition of root meristem growth. Taken together, these findings suggest that salt stress inhibits root meristem growth by repressing PIN expression (thereby reducing auxin levels) and stabilizing IAA17 (thereby repressing auxin signaling) via increasing NO levels.Due to agricultural practices and climate change, soil salinity has become a serious factor limiting the productivity and quality of agricultural crops (Zhu, 2007). Worldwide, high salinity in the soil damages approximately 20% of total irrigated lands and takes 1.5 million ha out of production each year (Munns and Tester, 2008). In general, high salinity affects plant growth and development by reducing plant water potential, altering nutrient uptake, and increasing the accumulation of toxic ions (Hasegawa et al., 2000; Munns, 2002; Zhang and Shi, 2013). Together, these effects severely reduce plant growth and survival.Because the root is the first organ to sense high salinity, salt stress plays a direct, important role in modulating root system architecture (Wang et al., 2009). For instance, salt stress negatively regulates root hair formation and gravitropism (Sun et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2008). The role of salt in lateral root formation depends on the NaCl concentration. While high NaCl levels inhibit lateral root formation, lower NaCl levels stimulate lateral root formation in an auxin-dependent manner (Zolla et al., 2010; Ji et al., 2013). The root meristem plays an essential role in sustaining root growth (Perilli et al., 2012). Salt stress inhibits primary root elongation by suppressing root meristem activity (West et al., 2004). However, how this inhibition occurs remains largely unclear.Plant hormones are important intermediary signaling compounds that function downstream of environmental stimuli. Among plant hormones, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) is thought to play a fundamental role in root system architecture by regulating cell division, expansion, and differentiation. In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) root tips, a distal auxin maximum is formed and maintained by polar auxin transport (PAT), which determines the orientation and extent of cell division in the root meristem as well as root pattern formation (Sabatini et al., 1999). PINFORMED (PIN) proteins, which are components of the auxin efflux machinery, regulate primary root elongation and root meristem size (Blilou et al., 2005; Dello Ioio et al., 2008; Yuan et al., 2013, 2014). The auxin signal transduction pathway is activated by direct binding of auxin to its receptor protein, TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE1 (TIR1)/AUXIN SIGNALING F-BOX (AFB), promoting the degradation of Aux/IAA proteins, releasing auxin response factors (ARFs), and activating the expression of auxin-responsive genes (Gray et al., 2001; Dharmasiri et al., 2005a; Kepinski and Leyser, 2005). Aux/IAA proteins are short-lived, nuclear-localized proteins that play key roles in auxin signal activation and root growth modulation (Rouse et al., 1998). Other hormones and stresses often regulate auxin signaling by affecting Aux/IAA protein stability (Lim and Kunkel, 2004; Nemhauser et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2007; Kushwah and Laxmi, 2014).Nitric oxide (NO) is a signaling molecule with diverse biological functions in plants (He et al., 2004; Fernández-Marcos et al., 2011; Shi et al., 2012), including important roles in the regulation of root growth and development. NO functions downstream of auxin during the adventitious rooting process in cucumber (Cucumis sativus; Pagnussat et al., 2002). Exogenous auxin-induced NO biosynthesis is associated with nitrate reductase activity during lateral root formation, and NO is necessary for auxin-induced lateral root and root hair development (Pagnussat et al., 2002; Lombardo et al., 2006). Pharmacological and genetic analyses in Arabidopsis indicate that NO suppresses primary root growth and root meristem activity (Fernández-Marcos et al., 2011). Additionally, both exogenous application of the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and overaccumulation of NO in the mutant chlorophyll a/b binding protein underexpressed1 (cue1)/nitric oxide overproducer1 (nox1) result in reduced PIN1 expression and auxin accumulation in root tips. The auxin receptors protein TIR1 is S-nitrosylated by NO, suggesting that this protein is a direct target of NO in the regulation of root development (Terrile et al., 2012).Because NO is a free radical, NO levels are dynamically regulated by endogenous and environmental cues. Many phytohormones, including abscisic acid, auxin, cytokinin, salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and ethylene, induce NO biosynthesis (Zottini et al., 2007; Kolbert et al., 2008; Tun et al., 2008; García et al., 2011). In addition, many abiotic and biotic stresses or stimuli, such as cold, heat, salt, drought, heavy metals, and pathogens/elicitors, also stimulate NO biosynthesis (Zhao et al., 2009; Mandal et al., 2012). Salt stress stimulates NO and ONOO^– accumulation in roots (Corpas et al., 2009), but the contribution of NO to root meristem growth under salinity stress has yet to be examined in detail.In this study, we found that salt stress significantly down-regulated the expression of PIN genes and promoted AUXIN RESISTANT3 (AXR3)/IAA17 stabilization. Furthermore, salt stress stimulated NO accumulation, and pharmacological inhibition of NO biosynthesis compromised the salt-mediated reduction in root meristem size. Our results support a model in which salt stress reduces root meristem size by increasing NO accumulation, which represses PIN expression and stabilizes IAA17, thereby reducing auxin levels and repressing auxin signaling.     

The Role of a Potassium Transporter OsHAK5 in Potassium Acquisition and Transport from Roots to Shoots in Rice at Low Potassium Supply Levels

In plants, K transporter (KT)/high affinity K transporter (HAK)/K uptake permease (KUP) is the largest potassium (K) transporter family; however, few of the members have had their physiological functions characterized in planta. Here, we studied OsHAK5 of the KT/HAK/KUP family in rice (Oryza sativa). We determined its cellular and tissue localization and analyzed its functions in rice using both OsHAK5 knockout mutants and overexpression lines in three genetic backgrounds. A β-glucuronidase reporter driven by the OsHAK5 native promoter indicated OsHAK5 expression in various tissue organs from root to seed, abundantly in root epidermis and stele, the vascular tissues, and mesophyll cells. Net K influx rate in roots and K transport from roots to aerial parts were severely impaired by OsHAK5 knockout but increased by OsHAK5 overexpression in 0.1 and 0.3 mm K external solution. The contribution of OsHAK5 to K mobilization within the rice plant was confirmed further by the change of K concentration in the xylem sap and K distribution in the transgenic lines when K was removed completely from the external solution. Overexpression of OsHAK5 increased the K-sodium concentration ratio in the shoots and salt stress tolerance (shoot growth), while knockout of OsHAK5 decreased the K-sodium concentration ratio in the shoots, resulting in sensitivity to salt stress. Taken together, these results demonstrate that OsHAK5 plays a major role in K acquisition by roots faced with low external K and in K upward transport from roots to shoots in K-deficient rice plants.Potassium (K) is one of the three most important macronutrients and the most abundant cation in plants. As a major osmoticum in the vacuole, K drives the generation of turgor pressure, enabling cell expansion. In the vascular tissue, K is an important participant in the generation of root pressure (for review, see Wegner, 2014 [including his new hypothesis]). In the phloem, K is critical for the transport of photoassimilates from source to sink (Marschner, 1996; Deeken et al., 2002; Gajdanowicz et al., 2011). In addition, enhancing K absorption and decreasing sodium (Na) accumulation is a major strategy of glycophytes in salt stress tolerance (Maathuis and Amtmann, 1999; Munns and Tester, 2008; Shabala and Cuin, 2008).Plants acquire K through K-permeable proteins at the root surface. Since available K concentration in the soil may vary by 100-fold, plants have developed multiple K uptake systems for adapting to this variability (Epstein et al., 1963; Grabov, 2007; Maathuis, 2009). In a classic K uptake experiment in barley (Hordeum vulgare), root K absorption has been described as a high-affinity and low-affinity biphasic transport process (Epstein et al., 1963). It is generally assumed that the low-affinity transport system (LATS) in the roots mediates K uptake in the millimolar range and that the activity of this system is insensitive to external K concentration (Maathuis and Sanders, 1997; Chérel et al., 2014). In contrast, the high-affinity transport system (HATS) was rapidly up-regulated when the supply of exogenous K was halted (Glass, 1976; Glass and Dunlop, 1978).The membrane transporters for K flux identified in plants are generally classified into three channels and three transporter families based on phylogenetic analysis (Mäser et al., 2001; Véry and Sentenac, 2003; Lebaudy et al., 2007; Alemán et al., 2011). For K uptake, it was predicted that, under most circumstances, K transporters function as HATS, while K-permeable channels mediate LATS (Maathuis and Sanders, 1997). However, a root-expressed K channel in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), Arabidopsis K Transporter1 (AKT1), mediates K absorption over a wide range of external K concentrations (Sentenac et al., 1992; Lagarde et al., 1996; Hirsch et al., 1998; Spalding et al., 1999), while evidence is accumulating that many K transporters, including members of the K transporter (KT)/high affinity K transporter (HAK)/K uptake permease (KUP) family, are low-affinity K transporters (Quintero and Blatt, 1997; Senn et al., 2001), implying that functions of plant K channels and transporters overlap at different K concentration ranges.Out of the three families of K transporters, cation proton antiporter (CPA), high affinity K/Na transporter (HKT), and KT/HAK/KUP, CPA was characterized as a K⁺(Na⁺)/H⁺ antiporter, HKT may cotransport Na and K or transport Na only (Rubio et al., 1995; Uozumi et al., 2000), while KT/HAK/KUP were predicted to be H⁺-coupled K⁺ symporters (Mäser et al., 2001; Lebaudy et al., 2007). KT/HAK/KUP were named by different researchers who first identified and cloned them (Quintero and Blatt, 1997; Santa-María et al., 1997). In plants, the KT/HAK/KUP family is the largest K transporter family, including 13 members in Arabidopsis and 27 members in the rice (Oryza sativa) genome (Rubio et al., 2000; Mäser et al., 2001; Bañuelos et al., 2002; Gupta et al., 2008). Sequence alignments show that genes of this family share relatively low homology to each other. The KT/HAK/KUP family was divided into four major clusters (Rubio et al., 2000; Gupta et al., 2008), and in cluster I and II, they were further separated into A and B groups. Genes of cluster I or II likely exist in all plants, cluster III is composed of genes from both Arabidopsis and rice, while cluster IV includes only four rice genes (Grabov, 2007; Gupta et al., 2008).The functions of KT/HAK/KUP were studied mostly in heterologous expression systems. Transporters of cluster I, such as AtHAK5, HvHAK1, OsHAK1, and OsHAK5, are localized in the plasma membrane (Kim et al., 1998; Bañuelos et al., 2002; Gierth et al., 2005) and exhibit high-affinity K uptake in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Santa-María et al., 1997; Fu and Luan, 1998; Rubio et al., 2000) and in Escherichia coli (Horie et al., 2011). Transporters of cluster II, like AtKUP4 (TINY ROOT HAIRS1, TRH1), HvHAK2, OsHAK2, OsHAK7, and OsHAK10, could not complement the K uptake-deficient yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) but were able to mediate K fluxes in a bacterial mutant; they might be tonoplast transporters (Senn et al., 2001; Bañuelos et al., 2002; Rodríguez-Navarro and Rubio, 2006). The function of transporters in clusters III and IV is even less known (Grabov, 2007).Existing data suggest that some KT/HAK/KUP transporters also may respond to salinity stress (Maathuis, 2009). The cluster I transporters of HvHAK1 mediate Na influx (Santa-María et al., 1997), while AtHAK5 expression is inhibited by Na (Rubio et al., 2000; Nieves-Cordones et al., 2010). Expression of OsHAK5 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) BY2 cells enhanced the salt tolerance of these cells by accumulating more K without affecting their Na content (Horie et al., 2011).There are only scarce reports on the physiological function of KT/HAK/KUP in planta. In Arabidopsis, mutation of AtKUP2 (SHORT HYPOCOTYL3) resulted in a short hypocotyl, small leaves, and a short flowering stem (Elumalai et al., 2002), while a loss-of-function mutation of AtKUP4 (TRH1) resulted in short root hairs and a loss of gravity response in the root (Rigas et al., 2001; Desbrosses et al., 2003; Ahn et al., 2004). AtHAK5 is the only system currently known to mediate K uptake at concentrations below 0.01 mm (Rubio et al., 2010) and provides a cesium uptake pathway (Qi et al., 2008). AtHAK5 and AtAKT1 are the two major physiologically relevant molecular entities mediating K uptake into roots in the range between 0.01 and 0.05 mm (Pyo et al., 2010; Rubio et al., 2010). AtAKT1 may contribute to K uptake within the K concentrations that belong to the high-affinity system described by Epstein et al. (1963).Among all 27 members of the KT/HAK/KUP family in rice, OsHAK1, OsHAK5, OsHAK19, and OsHAK20 were grouped in cluster IB (Gupta et al., 2008). These four rice HAK members share 50.9% to 53.4% amino acid identity with AtHAK5. OsHAK1 was expressed in the whole plant, with maximum expression in roots, and was up-regulated by K deficiency; it mediated high-affinity K uptake in yeast (Bañuelos et al., 2002). In this study, we examined the tissue-specific localization and the physiological functions of OsHAK5 in response to variation in K supply and to salt stress in rice. By comparing K uptake and translocation in OsHAK5 knockout (KO) mutants and in OsHAK5-overexpressing lines with those in their respective wild-type lines supplied with different K concentrations, we found that OsHAK5 not only mediates high-affinity K acquisition but also participates in root-to-shoot K transport as well as in K-regulated salt tolerance.     

Natural Variation of Arabidopsis Root Architecture Reveals Complementing Adaptive Strategies to Potassium Starvation

Root architecture is a highly plastic and environmentally responsive trait that enables plants to counteract nutrient scarcities with different foraging strategies. In potassium (K) deficiency (low K), seedlings of the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) reference accession Columbia (Col-0) show a strong reduction of lateral root elongation. To date, it is not clear whether this is a direct consequence of the lack of K as an osmoticum or a triggered response to maintain the growth of other organs under limiting conditions. In this study, we made use of natural variation within Arabidopsis to look for novel root architectural responses to low K. A comprehensive set of 14 differentially responding root parameters were quantified in K-starved and K-replete plants. We identified a phenotypic gradient that links two extreme strategies of morphological adaptation to low K arising from a major tradeoff between main root (MR) and lateral root elongation. Accessions adopting strategy I (e.g. Col-0) maintained MR growth but compromised lateral root elongation, whereas strategy II genotypes (e.g. Catania-1) arrested MR elongation in favor of lateral branching. K resupply and histochemical staining resolved the temporal and spatial patterns of these responses. Quantitative trait locus analysis of K-dependent root architectures within a Col-0 × Catania-1 recombinant inbred line population identified several loci each of which determined a particular subset of root architectural parameters. Our results indicate the existence of genomic hubs in the coordinated control of root growth in stress conditions and provide resources to facilitate the identification of the underlying genes.The ability of plants to actively respond to nutrient scarcity with changes in root architecture is a fascinating phenomenon. Advances in root research and breeding efforts that focus on the enhancement of root traits have been recognized as principal goals to ensure those high yields necessary to feed an ever-growing human population (Hammer et al., 2009; Den Herder et al., 2010). Indeed, understanding the adaptations of root systems to environmental factors has been pointed out as a key issue in modern agriculture (Den Herder et al., 2010).Potassium (K) is the quantitatively most important cation for plant growth, as it serves as the major osmoticum for cell expansion (Leigh and Wyn Jones, 1984; Amtmann et al., 2006). Moreover, K is essential for many cellular and tissue processes, such as enzymatic activity, transport of minerals and metabolites, and regulation of stomatal aperture (Amtmann et al., 2006). Even in fertilized fields, rapid K uptake by plants can lead to K shortage in the root environment, especially early in the growth season. Root adaptations to K deficiency (low K) take place at the physiological (Armengaud et al., 2004; Shin and Schachtman, 2004; Alemán et al., 2011), metabolic (Armengaud et al., 2009a), and morphological levels. In a classic study, Drew (1975) showed an increase in overall lateral root (LR) growth of barley seedlings, even when K was supplied only to parts of the root system. Conversely, a typical response of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) Columbia (Col-0) seedlings to low K is the drastic reduction of LR elongation (Armengaud et al., 2004; Shin and Schachtman, 2004). Conflicting data have been published on the effect of low K on main root (MR) growth in the same species, ranging from no effect (Shin and Schachtman, 2004) to impaired MR elongation (Jung et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2010). Some components involved in K starvation responses have been identified, such as jasmonates (Armengaud et al., 2004, 2010), reactive oxygen species (Shin and Schachtman, 2004), and ethylene (Jung et al., 2009). However, the molecular identity of a root K sensor acting at the base of the signaling cascade is so far unknown.Genetic variation within species is a useful resource to dissect the genetic components determining phenotypes (Koornneef et al., 2004; Trontin et al., 2011; Weigel, 2012). Natural variation within Arabidopsis has been the basis for many studies on plant morphology, physiology, and development as well as stress response (Alonso-Blanco et al., 2009; Weigel, 2012). Natural variation of root traits such as primary root length (Mouchel et al., 2004; Loudet et al., 2005; Sergeeva et al., 2006), LR length (Loudet et al., 2005), and total root size (Fitz Gerald et al., 2006) have pinpointed genomic regions underlying the phenotypic variation via mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) as a first step toward the identification of novel regulatory genes (Mouchel et al., 2004). This strategy has also been applied to environmental responses, such as growth responses to phosphate starvation (Reymond et al., 2006; Svistoonoff et al., 2007). However, despite their importance for plant growth and their strong effect on overall root architecture, root responses to K deficiency have not been genetically dissected.Here, we show that Arabidopsis accessions follow different strategies to adapt to K starvation. We present the quantification of a comprehensive set of root architectural parameters of Arabidopsis grown in K-sufficient and K-deficient media and the identification of genetic loci, each of which determines the response of a distinct subset of root architectural parameters to K starvation.     

Transposon-Mediated Alteration of TaMATE1B Expression in Wheat Confers Constitutive Citrate Efflux from Root Apices

The TaMATE1B gene (for multidrug and toxic compound extrusion) from wheat (Triticum aestivum) was isolated and shown to encode a citrate transporter that is located on the plasma membrane. TaMATE1B expression in roots was induced by iron deficiency but not by phosphorus deficiency or aluminum treatment. The coding region of TaMATE1B was identical in a genotype showing citrate efflux from root apices (cv Carazinho) to one that lacked citrate efflux (cv Egret). However, sequence upstream of the coding region differed between these two genotypes in two ways. The first difference was a single-nucleotide polymorphism located approximately 2 kb upstream from the start codon in cv Egret. The second difference was an 11.1-kb transposon-like element located 25 bp upstream of the start codon in cv Carazinho that was absent from cv Egret. The influence of these polymorphisms on TaMATE1B expression was investigated using fusions to green fluorescent protein expressed in transgenic lines of rice (Oryza sativa). Fluorescence measurements in roots of rice indicated that 1.5- and 2.3-kb regions upstream of TaMATE1B in cv Carazinho (which incorporated 3′ regions of the transposon-like element) generated 20-fold greater expression in the apical 1 mm of root compared with the native promoter in cv Egret. By contrast, fluorescence in more mature tissues was similar in both cultivars. The presence of the single-nucleotide polymorphism alone consistently generated 2-fold greater fluorescence than the cv Egret promoter. We conclude that the transposon-like element in cv Carazinho extends TaMATE1B expression to the root apex, where it confers citrate efflux and enhanced aluminum tolerance.Intraspecific variation in aluminum (Al3+) tolerance is evident in many crop species and has been shown to be under either simple or complex genetic control (Ma et al., 2004; Magalhaes et al., 2007; Krill et al., 2010; Famoso et al., 2011). In wheat (Triticum aestivum), Al3+ tolerance is primarily associated with efflux of organic anions from root tips, with at least two independent mechanisms being involved. The first and most widely distributed among genotypes is the Al3+-activated efflux of malate from root apices (Delhaize et al., 1993, Ryan et al., 1995). More recently, a second and less prevalent mechanism has been identified that relies on the constitutive efflux of citrate from root apices (Ryan et al., 2009).Organic anions protect roots by chelating and detoxifying Al3+ in the apoplast and rhizosphere around sensitive root apices (Delhaize et al., 1993, 2012; Ryan et al., 2001). For example, Al3+-tolerant genotypes of wheat release significantly more malate than sensitive genotypes (Ryan et al., 1995). The efflux of malate from root apices is mediated by the TaALMT1 (for Al3+-activated malate transporter) gene, which resides on chromosome 4DL (Raman et al., 2005, 2008; Zhou et al., 2007). TaALMT1 encodes an Al3+-activated anion channel permeable to malate located on the plasma membrane of root cells (Sasaki et al., 2004; Yamaguchi et al., 2005; Piñeros et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2008). Similarly, ALMT1 genes contribute to Al3+ tolerance in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), oilseed rape (Brassica napus), and rye (Secale cereale; Ryan et al., 2011). While all members of the ALMT family characterized to date encode transport proteins, only a minority are involved in Al3+ tolerance. The others contribute to physiological processes related to ionic relations and osmotic adjustment (Kovermann et al., 2007; Gruber et al., 2010; Meyer et al., 2010, 2011; Sasaki et al., 2010).In many plant species, citrate efflux from root apices also confers Al3+ tolerance. The genes controlling citrate efflux were first identified in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor; SbMATE [for multidrug and toxic compound extrusion]; Magalhaes et al., 2007) and barley (Hordeum vulgare; HvAACT1; Furukawa et al., 2007), with additional genes subsequently identified in Arabidopsis (Liu et al., 2009), maize (Zea mays; Maron et al., 2010), rice (Yokosho et al., 2009), and rice bean (Vigna umbellate; Yang et al., 2011). These genes belong to a large and ubiquitous family of MATE genes that were first identified in prokaryotes (Hvorup et al., 2003). SbMATE and HvAACT1 are part of a subset of plant MATE genes that facilitate citrate efflux (Liu et al., 2009; Magalhaes, 2010) with roles in Al3+ tolerance and iron (Fe) nutrition. For example, FRD3 from Arabidopsis and OsFRDL1 from rice both encode MATE proteins located in vascular tissue, where they release citrate into the xylem to enable Fe transport to shoots (Durrett et al., 2007). Recent evidence suggests that the Al3+ tolerance gene in barley, HvAACT1, was coopted from an original function in Fe nutrition by a random mutation. Al3+-tolerant genotypes of barley have a 1-kb insertion in the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) of the HvAACT1 coding region that alters its expression pattern. The insertion extends HvAACT1 expression to the root apices, which, in the presence of Al3+, causes citrate efflux from the apices and enhanced Al3+ tolerance (Fujii et al., 2012).Evidence that citrate efflux confers Al3+ tolerance in some genotypes of wheat was provided by Ryan et al. (2009). The trait was mapped to the long arm of chromosome 4B and cosegregated with an EST showing 94% sequence identity to HvAACT1. This EST was expressed only in the root apices of wheat lines that showed citrate efflux (e.g. cv Carazinho; Ryan et al., 2009), suggesting that a MATE gene encodes citrate efflux from root apices. Here, we describe the isolation and characterization of a MATE gene from wheat named TaMATE1B that encodes a citrate transporter located on the plasma membrane. A large transposable element-like sequence was found to be inserted near the start of the TaMATE1B coding region specifically in genotypes that release citrate. We demonstrate that the fragment functions as a promoter that extends TaMATE1B expression to root apices and discuss how this mutation recruited a gene to confer a new phenotype associated with Al3+ tolerance.