Salt Stress Reduces Root Meristem Size by Nitric Oxide-Mediated Modulation of Auxin Accumulation and Signaling in Arabidopsis

The development of the plant root system is highly plastic, which allows the plant to adapt to various environmental stresses. Salt stress inhibits root elongation by reducing the size of the root meristem. However, the mechanism underlying this process remains unclear. In this study, we explored whether and how auxin and nitric oxide (NO) are involved in salt-mediated inhibition of root meristem growth in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) using physiological, pharmacological, and genetic approaches. We found that salt stress significantly reduced root meristem size by down-regulating the expression of PINFORMED (PIN) genes, thereby reducing auxin levels. In addition, salt stress promoted AUXIN RESISTANT3 (AXR3)/INDOLE-3-ACETIC ACID17 (IAA17) stabilization, which repressed auxin signaling during this process. Furthermore, salt stress stimulated NO accumulation, whereas blocking NO production with the inhibitor N^ω-nitro-l-arginine-methylester compromised the salt-mediated reduction of root meristem size, PIN down-regulation, and stabilization of AXR3/IAA17, indicating that NO is involved in salt-mediated inhibition of root meristem growth. Taken together, these findings suggest that salt stress inhibits root meristem growth by repressing PIN expression (thereby reducing auxin levels) and stabilizing IAA17 (thereby repressing auxin signaling) via increasing NO levels.Due to agricultural practices and climate change, soil salinity has become a serious factor limiting the productivity and quality of agricultural crops (Zhu, 2007). Worldwide, high salinity in the soil damages approximately 20% of total irrigated lands and takes 1.5 million ha out of production each year (Munns and Tester, 2008). In general, high salinity affects plant growth and development by reducing plant water potential, altering nutrient uptake, and increasing the accumulation of toxic ions (Hasegawa et al., 2000; Munns, 2002; Zhang and Shi, 2013). Together, these effects severely reduce plant growth and survival.Because the root is the first organ to sense high salinity, salt stress plays a direct, important role in modulating root system architecture (Wang et al., 2009). For instance, salt stress negatively regulates root hair formation and gravitropism (Sun et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2008). The role of salt in lateral root formation depends on the NaCl concentration. While high NaCl levels inhibit lateral root formation, lower NaCl levels stimulate lateral root formation in an auxin-dependent manner (Zolla et al., 2010; Ji et al., 2013). The root meristem plays an essential role in sustaining root growth (Perilli et al., 2012). Salt stress inhibits primary root elongation by suppressing root meristem activity (West et al., 2004). However, how this inhibition occurs remains largely unclear.Plant hormones are important intermediary signaling compounds that function downstream of environmental stimuli. Among plant hormones, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) is thought to play a fundamental role in root system architecture by regulating cell division, expansion, and differentiation. In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) root tips, a distal auxin maximum is formed and maintained by polar auxin transport (PAT), which determines the orientation and extent of cell division in the root meristem as well as root pattern formation (Sabatini et al., 1999). PINFORMED (PIN) proteins, which are components of the auxin efflux machinery, regulate primary root elongation and root meristem size (Blilou et al., 2005; Dello Ioio et al., 2008; Yuan et al., 2013, 2014). The auxin signal transduction pathway is activated by direct binding of auxin to its receptor protein, TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE1 (TIR1)/AUXIN SIGNALING F-BOX (AFB), promoting the degradation of Aux/IAA proteins, releasing auxin response factors (ARFs), and activating the expression of auxin-responsive genes (Gray et al., 2001; Dharmasiri et al., 2005a; Kepinski and Leyser, 2005). Aux/IAA proteins are short-lived, nuclear-localized proteins that play key roles in auxin signal activation and root growth modulation (Rouse et al., 1998). Other hormones and stresses often regulate auxin signaling by affecting Aux/IAA protein stability (Lim and Kunkel, 2004; Nemhauser et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2007; Kushwah and Laxmi, 2014).Nitric oxide (NO) is a signaling molecule with diverse biological functions in plants (He et al., 2004; Fernández-Marcos et al., 2011; Shi et al., 2012), including important roles in the regulation of root growth and development. NO functions downstream of auxin during the adventitious rooting process in cucumber (Cucumis sativus; Pagnussat et al., 2002). Exogenous auxin-induced NO biosynthesis is associated with nitrate reductase activity during lateral root formation, and NO is necessary for auxin-induced lateral root and root hair development (Pagnussat et al., 2002; Lombardo et al., 2006). Pharmacological and genetic analyses in Arabidopsis indicate that NO suppresses primary root growth and root meristem activity (Fernández-Marcos et al., 2011). Additionally, both exogenous application of the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and overaccumulation of NO in the mutant chlorophyll a/b binding protein underexpressed1 (cue1)/nitric oxide overproducer1 (nox1) result in reduced PIN1 expression and auxin accumulation in root tips. The auxin receptors protein TIR1 is S-nitrosylated by NO, suggesting that this protein is a direct target of NO in the regulation of root development (Terrile et al., 2012).Because NO is a free radical, NO levels are dynamically regulated by endogenous and environmental cues. Many phytohormones, including abscisic acid, auxin, cytokinin, salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and ethylene, induce NO biosynthesis (Zottini et al., 2007; Kolbert et al., 2008; Tun et al., 2008; García et al., 2011). In addition, many abiotic and biotic stresses or stimuli, such as cold, heat, salt, drought, heavy metals, and pathogens/elicitors, also stimulate NO biosynthesis (Zhao et al., 2009; Mandal et al., 2012). Salt stress stimulates NO and ONOO^– accumulation in roots (Corpas et al., 2009), but the contribution of NO to root meristem growth under salinity stress has yet to be examined in detail.In this study, we found that salt stress significantly down-regulated the expression of PIN genes and promoted AUXIN RESISTANT3 (AXR3)/IAA17 stabilization. Furthermore, salt stress stimulated NO accumulation, and pharmacological inhibition of NO biosynthesis compromised the salt-mediated reduction in root meristem size. Our results support a model in which salt stress reduces root meristem size by increasing NO accumulation, which represses PIN expression and stabilizes IAA17, thereby reducing auxin levels and repressing auxin signaling.     

Spore Density Determines Infection Strategy by the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina

Necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens are resisted by different plant defenses. While necrotrophic pathogens are sensitive to jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent resistance, biotrophic pathogens are resisted by salicylic acid (SA)- and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent resistance. Although many pathogens switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy during infection, little is known about the signals triggering this transition. This study is based on the observation that the early colonization pattern and symptom development by the ascomycete pathogen Plectosphaerella cucumerina (P. cucumerina) vary between inoculation methods. Using the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) defense response as a proxy for infection strategy, we examined whether P. cucumerina alternates between hemibiotrophic and necrotrophic lifestyles, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf surface. Untargeted metabolome analysis revealed profound differences in metabolic defense signatures upon different inoculation methods. Quantification of JA and SA, marker gene expression, and cell death confirmed that infection from high spore densities activates JA-dependent defenses with excessive cell death, while infection from low spore densities induces SA-dependent defenses with lower levels of cell death. Phenotyping of Arabidopsis mutants in JA, SA, and ROS signaling confirmed that P. cucumerina is differentially resisted by JA- and SA/ROS-dependent defenses, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf. Furthermore, in situ staining for early callose deposition at the infection sites revealed that necrotrophy by P. cucumerina is associated with elevated host defense. We conclude that P. cucumerina adapts to early-acting plant defenses by switching from a hemibiotrophic to a necrotrophic infection program, thereby gaining an advantage of immunity-related cell death in the host.Plant pathogens are often classified as necrotrophic or biotrophic, depending on their infection strategy (Glazebrook, 2005; Nishimura and Dangl, 2010). Necrotrophic pathogens kill living host cells and use the decayed plant tissue as a substrate to colonize the plant, whereas biotrophic pathogens parasitize living plant cells by employing effector molecules that suppress the host immune system (Pel and Pieterse, 2013). Despite this binary classification, the majority of pathogenic microbes employ a hemibiotrophic infection strategy, which is characterized by an initial biotrophic phase followed by a necrotrophic infection strategy at later stages of infection (Perfect and Green, 2001). The pathogenic fungi Magnaporthe grisea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and Mycosphaerella graminicola, the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, and the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae are examples of hemibiotrophic plant pathogens (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011; van Kan et al., 2014; Kabbage et al., 2015).Despite considerable progress in our understanding of plant resistance to necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens (Glazebrook, 2005; Mengiste, 2012; Lai and Mengiste, 2013), recent debate highlights the dynamic and complex interplay between plant-pathogenic microbes and their hosts, which is raising concerns about the use of infection strategies as a static tool to classify plant pathogens. For instance, the fungal genus Botrytis is often labeled as an archetypal necrotroph, even though there is evidence that it can behave as an endophytic fungus with a biotrophic lifestyle (van Kan et al., 2014). The rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, which is often classified as a hemibiotrophic leaf pathogen (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011), can adopt a purely biotrophic lifestyle when infecting root tissues (Marcel et al., 2010). It remains unclear which signals are responsible for the switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy and whether these signals rely solely on the physiological state of the pathogen, or whether host-derived signals play a role as well (Kabbage et al., 2015).The plant hormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) play a central role in the activation of plant defenses (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012). The first evidence that biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens are resisted by different immune responses came from Thomma et al. (1998), who demonstrated that Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genotypes impaired in SA signaling show enhanced susceptibility to the biotrophic pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (formerly known as Peronospora parastitica), while JA-insensitive genotypes were more susceptible to the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria brassicicola. In subsequent years, the differential effectiveness of SA- and JA-dependent defense mechanisms has been confirmed in different plant-pathogen interactions, while additional plant hormones, such as ethylene, abscisic acid (ABA), auxins, and cytokinins, have emerged as regulators of SA- and JA-dependent defenses (Bari and Jones, 2009; Cao et al., 2011; Pieterse et al., 2012). Moreover, SA- and JA-dependent defense pathways have been shown to act antagonistically on each other, which allows plants to prioritize an appropriate defense response to attack by biotrophic pathogens, necrotrophic pathogens, or herbivores (Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008; Pieterse et al., 2009; Verhage et al., 2010).In addition to plant hormones, reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important regulatory role in plant defenses (Torres et al., 2006; Lehmann et al., 2015). Within minutes after the perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns, NADPH oxidases and apoplastic peroxidases generate early ROS bursts (Torres et al., 2002; Daudi et al., 2012; O’Brien et al., 2012), which activate downstream defense signaling cascades (Apel and Hirt, 2004; Torres et al., 2006; Miller et al., 2009; Mittler et al., 2011; Lehmann et al., 2015). ROS play an important regulatory role in the deposition of callose (Luna et al., 2011; Pastor et al., 2013) and can also stimulate SA-dependent defenses (Chaouch et al., 2010; Yun and Chen, 2011; Wang et al., 2014; Mammarella et al., 2015). However, the spread of SA-induced apoptosis during hyperstimulation of the plant immune system is contained by the ROS-generating NADPH oxidase RBOHD (Torres et al., 2005), presumably to allow for the sufficient generation of SA-dependent defense signals from living cells that are adjacent to apoptotic cells. Nitric oxide (NO) plays an additional role in the regulation of SA/ROS-dependent defense (Trapet et al., 2015). This gaseous molecule can stimulate ROS production and cell death in the absence of SA while preventing excessive ROS production at high cellular SA levels via S-nitrosylation of RBOHD (Yun et al., 2011). Recently, it was shown that pathogen-induced accumulation of NO and ROS promotes the production of azelaic acid, a lipid derivative that primes distal plants for SA-dependent defenses (Wang et al., 2014). Hence, NO, ROS, and SA are intertwined in a complex regulatory network to mount local and systemic resistance against biotrophic pathogens. Interestingly, pathogens with a necrotrophic lifestyle can benefit from ROS/SA-dependent defenses and associated cell death (Govrin and Levine, 2000). For instance, Kabbage et al. (2013) demonstrated that S. sclerotiorum utilizes oxalic acid to repress oxidative defense signaling during initial biotrophic colonization, but it stimulates apoptosis at later stages to advance necrotrophic colonization. Moreover, SA-induced repression of JA-dependent resistance not only benefits necrotrophic pathogens but also hemibiotrophic pathogens after having switched from biotrophy to necrotrophy (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012).Plectosphaerella cucumerina ((P. cucumerina, anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) is a filamentous ascomycete fungus that can survive saprophytically in soil by decomposing plant material (Palm et al., 1995). The fungus can cause sudden death and blight disease in a variety of crops (Chen et al., 1999; Harrington et al., 2000). Because P. cucumerina can infect Arabidopsis leaves, the P. cucumerina-Arabidopsis interaction has emerged as a popular model system in which to study plant defense reactions to necrotrophic fungi (Berrocal-Lobo et al., 2002; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Carlucci et al., 2012; Ramos et al., 2013). Various studies have shown that Arabidopsis deploys a wide range of inducible defense strategies against P. cucumerina, including JA-, SA-, ABA-, and auxin-dependent defenses, glucosinolates (Tierens et al., 2001; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014), callose deposition (García-Andrade et al., 2011; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012), and ROS (Tierens et al., 2002; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Barna et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Recent metabolomics studies have revealed large-scale metabolic changes in P. cucumerina-infected Arabidopsis, presumably to mobilize chemical defenses (Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Furthermore, various chemical agents have been reported to induce resistance against P. cucumerina. These chemicals include β-amino-butyric acid, which primes callose deposition and SA-dependent defenses, benzothiadiazole (BTH or Bion; Görlach et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), which activates SA-related defenses (Lawton et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Gamir et al., 2014; Luna et al., 2014), JA (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), and ABA, which primes ROS and callose deposition (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Pastor et al., 2013). However, among all these studies, there is increasing controversy about the exact signaling pathways and defense responses contributing to plant resistance against P. cucumerina. While it is clear that JA and ethylene contribute to basal resistance against the fungus, the exact roles of SA, ABA, and ROS in P. cucumerina resistance vary between studies (Thomma et al., 1998; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2014).This study is based on the observation that the disease phenotype during P. cucumerina infection differs according to the inoculation method used. We provide evidence that the fungus follows a hemibiotrophic infection strategy when infecting from relatively low spore densities on the leaf surface. By contrast, when challenged by localized host defense to relatively high spore densities, the fungus switches to a necrotrophic infection program. Our study has uncovered a novel strategy by which plant-pathogenic fungi can take advantage of the early immune response in the host plant.     

HAPLESS13, the Arabidopsis μ1 Adaptin,Is Essential for Protein Sorting at the trans-Golgi Network/Early Endosome

In plant cells, secretory and endocytic routes intersect at the trans-Golgi network (TGN)/early endosome (EE), where cargos are further sorted correctly and in a timely manner. Cargo sorting is essential for plant survival and therefore necessitates complex molecular machinery. Adaptor proteins (APs) play key roles in this process by recruiting coat proteins and selecting cargos for different vesicle carriers. The µ1 subunit of AP-1 in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) was recently identified at the TGN/EE and shown to be essential for cytokinesis. However, little was known about other cellular activities affected by mutations in AP-1 or the developmental consequences of such mutations. We report here that HAPLESS13 (HAP13), the Arabidopsis µ1 adaptin, is essential for protein sorting at the TGN/EE. Functional loss of HAP13 displayed pleiotropic developmental defects, some of which were suggestive of disrupted auxin signaling. Consistent with this, the asymmetric localization of PIN-FORMED2 (PIN2), an auxin transporter, was compromised in the mutant. In addition, cell morphogenesis was disrupted. We further demonstrate that HAP13 is critical for brefeldin A-sensitive but wortmannin-insensitive post-Golgi trafficking. Our results show that HAP13 is a key link in the sophisticated trafficking network in plant cells.Plant cells contain sophisticated endomembrane compartments, including the endoplasmic reticulum, the Golgi, the trans-Golgi network (TGN)/early endosome (EE), the prevacuolar compartments/multivesicular bodies (PVC/MVB), various types of vesicles, and the plasma membrane (PM; Ebine and Ueda, 2009; Richter et al., 2009). Intracellular protein sorting between the various locations in the endomembrane system occurs in both secretory and endocytic routes (Richter et al., 2009; De Marcos Lousa et al., 2012). Vesicles in the secretory route start at the endoplasmic reticulum, passing through the Golgi before reaching the TGN/EE, while vesicles in the endocytic route start from the PM before reaching the TGN/EE (Dhonukshe et al., 2007; Viotti et al., 2010). The TGN/EE in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) is an independent and highly dynamic organelle transiently associated with the Golgi (Dettmer et al., 2006; Lam et al., 2007; Viotti et al., 2010), distinct from the animal TGN. Once reaching the TGN/EE, proteins delivered by their vesicle carriers are subject to further sorting, being incorporated either into vesicles that pass through the PVC/MVB before reaching the vacuole for degradation or into vesicles that enter the secretory pathway for delivery to the PM (Ebine and Ueda, 2009; Richter et al., 2009). Therefore, the TGN/EE is a critical sorting compartment that lies at the intersection of the secretory and endocytic routes.Fine-tuned control of intracellular protein sorting at the TGN/EE is essential for plant development (Geldner et al., 2003; Dhonukshe et al., 2007, 2008; Richter et al., 2007; Kitakura et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2013). An auxin gradient is crucial for pattern formation in plants, whose dynamic maintenance requires the polar localization of auxin efflux carrier PINs through endocytic recycling (Geldner et al., 2003; Blilou et al., 2005; Paciorek et al., 2005; Abas et al., 2006; Jaillais et al., 2006; Dhonukshe et al., 2007; Kleine-Vehn et al., 2008). Receptor-like kinases (RLKs) have also been recognized as major cargos undergoing endocytic trafficking, which are either recycled back to the PM or sent for vacuolar degradation (Geldner and Robatzek, 2008; Irani and Russinova, 2009). RLKs are involved in most if not all developmental processes of plants (De Smet et al., 2009).Intracellular protein sorting relies on sorting signals within cargo proteins and on the molecular machinery that recognizes sorting signals (Boehm and Bonifacino, 2001; Robinson, 2004; Dhonukshe et al., 2007). Adaptor proteins (AP) play a key role (Boehm and Bonifacino, 2001; Robinson, 2004) in the recognition of sorting signals. APs are heterotetrameric protein complexes composed of two large subunits (β and γ/α/δ/ε), a small subunit (σ), and a medium subunit (µ) that is crucial for cargo selection (Boehm and Bonifacino, 2001). APs associate with the cytoplasmic side of secretory and endocytic vesicles, recruiting coat proteins and recognizing sorting signals within cargo proteins for their incorporation into vesicle carriers (Boehm and Bonifacino, 2001). Five APs have been identified so far, classified by their components, subcellular localization, and function (Boehm and Bonifacino, 2001; Robinson, 2004; Hirst et al., 2011). Of the five APs, AP-1 associates with the TGN or recycling endosomes (RE) in yeast and mammals (Huang et al., 2001; Robinson, 2004), mediating the sorting of cargo proteins to compartments of the endosomal-lysosomal system or to the basolateral PM of polarized epithelial cells (Gonzalez and Rodriguez-Boulan, 2009). Knockouts of AP-1 components in multicellular organisms resulted in embryonic lethality (Boehm and Bonifacino, 2001; Robinson, 2004).We show here that the recently identified Arabidopsis µ1 adaptin AP1M2 (Park et al., 2013; Teh et al., 2013) is a key component in the cellular machinery mediating intracellular protein sorting at the TGN/EE. AP1M2 was previously named HAPLESS13 (HAP13), whose mutant allele hap13 showed male gametophytic lethality (Johnson et al., 2004). In recent quests for AP-1 in plants, HAP13/AP1M2 was confirmed as the Arabidopsis µ1 adaptin based on its interaction with other components of the AP-1 complex as well as its localization at the TGN (Park et al., 2013; Teh et al., 2013). A novel mutant allele of HAP13/AP1M2, ap1m2-1, was found to be defective in the intracellular distribution of KNOLLE, leading to defective cytokinesis (Park et al., 2013; Teh et al., 2013). However, it was not clear whether HAP13/AP1M2 mediated other cellular activities and their developmental consequences. Using the same mutant allele, we found that functional loss of HAP13 (hap13-1/ap1m2-1) resulted in a full spectrum of growth defects, suggestive of compromised auxin signaling and of defective RLK signaling. Cell morphogenesis was also disturbed in hap13-1. Importantly, hap13-1 was insensitive to brefeldin A (BFA) washout, indicative of defects in guanine nucleotide exchange factors for ADP-ribosylation factor (ArfGEF)-mediated post-Golgi trafficking. Furthermore, HAP13/AP1M2 showed evolutionarily conserved function during vacuolar fusion, providing additional support to its identity as a µ1 adaptin. These results demonstrate the importance of the Arabidopsis µ1 adaptin for intracellular protein sorting centered on the TGN/EE.     

Block of ATP-Binding Cassette B19 Ion Channel Activity by 5-Nitro-2-(3-Phenylpropylamino)-Benzoic Acid Impairs Polar Auxin Transport and Root Gravitropism

Polar transport of the hormone auxin through tissues and organs depends on membrane proteins, including some B-subgroup members of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family. The messenger RNA level of at least one B-subgroup ABCB gene in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), ABCB19, increases upon treatment with the anion channel blocker 5-nitro-2-(3-phenylpropylamino)-benzoic acid (NPPB), possibly to compensate for an inhibitory effect of the drug on ABCB19 activity. Consistent with this hypothesis, NPPB blocked ion channel activity associated with ABCB19 expressed in human embryonic kidney cells as measured by patch-clamp electrophysiology. NPPB inhibited polar auxin transport through Arabidopsis seedling roots similarly to abcb19 mutations. NPPB also inhibited shootward auxin transport, which depends on the related ABCB4 protein. NPPB substantially decreased ABCB4 and ABCB19 protein levels when cycloheximide concomitantly inhibited new protein synthesis, indicating that blockage by NPPB enhances the degradation of ABCB transporters. Impairing the principal auxin transport streams in roots with NPPB caused aberrant patterns of auxin signaling reporters in root apices. Formation of the auxin-signaling gradient across the tips of gravity-stimulated roots, and its developmental consequence (gravitropism), were inhibited by micromolar concentrations of NPPB that did not affect growth rate. These results identify ion channel activity of ABCB19 that is blocked by NPPB, a compound that can now be considered an inhibitor of polar auxin transport with a defined molecular target.The directed flow of auxin from cell to cell, through tissues and organs, from sites of synthesis to sites of action underlies the coordination of many processes during plant growth and development. Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) PIN-FORMED (PIN) genes were the first found to be necessary for the phenomenon known as polar auxin transport (Okada et al., 1991; Chen et al., 1998; Gälweiler et al., 1998). Asymmetric localization of PIN proteins to the downstream ends of each cell in auxin-transporting tissues was correctly suggested to be a molecular component of the efflux mechanisms (Gälweiler et al., 1998) originally hypothesized as necessary for a directionally biased, or polar movement of auxin through tissues (Rubery and Sheldrake, 1974; Raven, 1975; Goldsmith, 1977; Goldsmith et al., 1981). Other members of the eight-gene PIN family in Arabidopsis were subsequently shown to affect auxin distribution in various tissues and stages of development (Křeček et al., 2009).Shortly after the breakthrough work on PIN1, members of the B subfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABCB) transporters were discovered to be equally necessary for the phenomenon of polar auxin transport. They were originally called P-GLYCOPROTEIN1 (Dudler and Hertig, 1992; Sidler et al., 1998) and MULTIDRUG RESISTANCE1 (Noh et al., 2001) and ultimately renamed AtABCB1 and AtABCB19, respectively (Verrier et al., 2008). The connection between ABCB transporters and auxin transport was first made through the analysis of Arabidopsis knockout mutants. Polar auxin flow through abcb19 mutant stems is impaired by approximately 80% compared with the wild type and further reduced in abcb1 abcb19 double mutants (Noh et al., 2001). Resultant effects on development include abnormal hypocotyl tropisms (Noh et al., 2003) and the photomorphogenic control of hypocotyl elongation (Wu et al., 2010). Import of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) to cotyledons through the petiole is reduced by 50% in abcb19 mutants, and this is correlated with an equivalent reduction in cotyledon blade expansion (Lewis et al., 2009). In roots, loss of ABCB19 greatly impairs auxin flow toward the tip without any detectable effect on shootward flow (Lewis et al., 2007). Surprisingly, the only defect detected in abcb19 primary roots associated with this major disruption of auxin transport is greater meandering of the tip during elongation down a vertical agar surface; gravitropism is unaffected (Lewis et al., 2007). Outgrowth of lateral roots, although not their initiation, depends significantly on ABCB19-mediated tipward auxin transport (Wu et al., 2007). The emergence of adventitious roots at the base of hypocotyls from which roots have been excised from Arabidopsis seedlings depends strongly on ABCB19-mediated auxin accumulation at the sites of primordium initiation (Sukumar et al., 2013).The ABCB19 protein is present predominantly in the central cylinder and cortex of the root, consistent with its role in rootward auxin transport (Lewis et al., 2007; Mravec et al., 2008), whereas the closely related ABCB4 is restricted to the lateral root cap and epidermis (Cho et al., 2007), where it functions in shootward auxin transport (Lewis et al., 2007). Loss of ABCB4 function alters the timing and spatial pattern of gravitropic curvature development, apparently because the gravity-induced auxin gradient across the root is less rapidly dissipated by normal shootward (basipetal) transport of the hormone through the elongation zone (Lewis et al., 2007). Root hairs are significantly longer in abcb4 mutants, a phenotype attributed to auxin accumulation due to impaired efflux (Cho et al., 2007). ABCB4 is reported to conduct auxin influx or efflux, depending on the prevailing external auxin concentration (Kubeš et al., 2012).Noh et al. (2001) originally isolated ABCB19 in a molecular screen for genes encoding an ion channel activity in Arabidopsis cells shown by patch-clamp electrophysiology to be blocked by 5-nitro-2-(3-phenylpropylamino)-benzoic acid (NPPB). The rationale for the screen was that a plant challenged with a channel blocker would overexpress the gene encoding the blocked activity. A hypothesis emerging from the Noh et al. (2001) study is that ABCB19 encodes such an ion channel, which is required for polar auxin transport. If true, NPPB would be established as a blocker of polar auxin transport.Pharmacological inhibitors, used for decades in auxin transport research, have some advantages over mutations. Mutations can create complicating pleiotropic effects by inhibiting the process throughout development, while inhibitors can be used to impose an effect at a specific time. 1-Naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA) is the most commonly used inhibitor of polar auxin transport (Katekar and Geissler, 1980), but others are being discovered (Rojas-Pierce et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2010; Tsuda et al., 2011). Inhibitors are especially useful when their targets are well defined, which would be the case if NPPB blocked ABCB19 and induced its expression as hypothesized. The experiments reported here were designed to test this hypothesis with electrophysiological measurements of ABCB19 transport activity, radiotracer measurements of polar auxin transport in roots, levels of fluorescently tagged ABCB19 proteins, auxin reporter expression patterns, and machine-vision measurements of a root growth response that depends on auxin redistribution.     

Reactive Oxygen Species Tune Root Tropic Responses

The default growth pattern of primary roots of land plants is directed by gravity. However, roots possess the ability to sense and respond directionally to other chemical and physical stimuli, separately and in combination. Therefore, these root tropic responses must be antagonistic to gravitropism. The role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in gravitropism of maize and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) roots has been previously described. However, which cellular signals underlie the integration of the different environmental stimuli, which lead to an appropriate root tropic response, is currently unknown. In gravity-responding roots, we observed, by applying the ROS-sensitive fluorescent dye dihydrorhodamine-123 and confocal microscopy, a transient asymmetric ROS distribution, higher at the concave side of the root. The asymmetry, detected at the distal elongation zone, was built in the first 2 h of the gravitropic response and dissipated after another 2 h. In contrast, hydrotropically responding roots show no transient asymmetric distribution of ROS. Decreasing ROS levels by applying the antioxidant ascorbate, or the ROS-generation inhibitor diphenylene iodonium attenuated gravitropism while enhancing hydrotropism. Arabidopsis mutants deficient in Ascorbate Peroxidase 1 showed attenuated hydrotropic root bending. Mutants of the root-expressed NADPH oxidase RBOH C, but not rbohD, showed enhanced hydrotropism and less ROS in their roots apices (tested in tissue extracts with Amplex Red). Finally, hydrostimulation prior to gravistimulation attenuated the gravistimulated asymmetric ROS and auxin signals that are required for gravity-directed curvature. We suggest that ROS, presumably H₂O₂, function in tuning root tropic responses by promoting gravitropism and negatively regulating hydrotropism.Plants evolved the ability to sense and respond to various environmental stimuli in an integrated fashion. Due to their sessile nature, they respond to directional stimuli such as light, gravity, touch, and moisture by directional organ growth (curvature), a phenomenon termed tropism. Experiments on coleoptiles conducted by Darwin in the 1880s revealed that in phototropism, the light stimulus is perceived by the tip, from which a signal is transmitted to the growing part (Darwin and Darwin, 1880). Darwin postulated that in a similar manner, the root tip perceives stimuli from the environment, including gravity and moisture, processes them, and directs the growth movement, acting like “the brain of one of the lower animals” (Darwin and Darwin, 1880). The transmitted signal in phototropism and gravitropism was later found to be a phytohormone, and its redistribution on opposite sides of the root or shoot was hypothesized to promote differential growth and bending of the organ (Went, 1926; Cholodny, 1927). Over the years, the phytohormone was characterized as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA, auxin; Kögl et al., 1934; Thimann, 1935), and the ‘Cholodny-Went’ theory was demonstrated for gravitropism and phototropism (Rashotte et al., 2000; Friml et al., 2002). In addition to auxin, second messengers such as Ca²⁺, pH oscillations, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and abscisic acid (ABA) were shown to play an essential role in gravitropism (Young and Evans, 1994; Fasano et al., 2001; Joo et al., 2001; Ponce et al., 2008). Auxin was shown to induce ROS accumulation during root gravitropism, where the gravitropic bending is ROS dependent (Joo et al., 2001; Peer et al., 2013).ROS such as superoxide and hydrogen peroxide were initially considered toxic byproducts of aerobic respiration but currently are known also for their essential role in myriad cellular and physiological processes in animals and plants (Mittler et al., 2011). ROS and antioxidants are essential components of plant cell growth (Foreman et al., 2003), cell cycle control, and shoot apical meristem maintenance (Schippers et al., 2016) and play a crucial role in protein modification and cellular redox homeostasis (Foyer and Noctor, 2005). ROS function as signal molecules by mediating both biotic- (Sagi and Fluhr, 2006; Miller et al., 2009) and abiotic- (Kwak et al., 2003; Sharma and Dietz, 2009) stress responses. Joo et al. (2001) reported a transient increase in intracellular ROS concentrations early in the gravitropic response, at the concave side of maize roots, where auxin concentrations are higher. Indeed, this asymmetric ROS distribution is required for gravitropic bending, since maize roots treated with antioxidants, which act as ROS scavengers, showed reduced gravitropic root bending (Joo et al., 2001). The link between auxin and ROS production was later shown to involve the activation of NADPH oxidase, a major membrane-bound ROS generator, via a PI3K-dependent pathway (Brightman et al., 1988; Joo et al., 2005; Peer et al., 2013). Peer et al. (2013) suggested that in gravitropism, ROS buffer auxin signaling by oxidizing the active auxin IAA to the nonactive and nontransported form, oxIAA.Gravitropic-oriented growth is the default growth program of the plant, with shoots growing upwards and roots downward. However, upon exposure to specific external stimuli, the plant overcomes its gravitropic growth program and bends toward or away from the source of the stimulus. For example, as roots respond to physical obstacles or water deficiency. The ability of roots to direct their growth toward environments of higher water potential was described by Darwin and even earlier and was later defined as hydrotropism (Von Sachs, 1887; Jaffe et al., 1985; Eapen et al., 2005).In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), wild-type seedlings respond to moisture gradients (hydrostimulation) by bending their primary roots toward higher water potential. Upon hydrostimulation, amyloplasts, the starch-containing plastids in root-cap columella cells, which function as part of the gravity sensing system, are degraded within hours and recover upon water replenishment (Takahashi et al., 2003; Ponce et al., 2008; Nakayama et al., 2012). Moreover, mutants with a reduced response to gravity (pgm1) and to auxin (axr1 and axr2) exhibit higher responsiveness to hydrostimulation, manifested as accelerated bending compared to wild-type roots (Takahashi et al., 2002, 2003). Recently, we have shown that hydrotropic root bending does not require auxin redistribution and is accelerated in the presence of auxin polar transport inhibitors and auxin-signaling antagonists (Shkolnik et al., 2016). These results reflect the competition, or interference, between root gravitropism and hydrotropism (Takahashi et al., 2009). However, which cellular signals participate in the integration of the different environmental stimuli that direct root tropic curvature is still poorly understood. Here we sought to assess the potential role of ROS in regulating hydrotropism and gravitropism in Arabidopsis roots.