Neuroprotection afforded by adenosine A2A receptor blockade is modulated by corticotrophin‐releasing factor (CRF) in glutamate injured cortical neurons

In situations of hypoxia, glutamate excitotoxicity induces neuronal death. The release of extracellular adenosine is also triggered and is accompanied by an increase of the stress mediator, corticotrophin‐releasing factor (CRF). Adenosine A_2A receptors contribute to glutamate excitoxicity and their blockade is effective in stress‐induced neuronal deficits, but the involvement of CRF on this effect was never explored. We now evaluated the interaction between A_2A and CRF receptors (CRFR) function, upon glutamate insult. Primary rat cortical neuronal cultures (9 days in vitro) expressing both CRF₁R and CRF₂R were challenged with glutamate (20–1000 μM, 24 h). CRF₁R was found to co‐localize with neuronal markers and CRF₂R to be present in both neuronal and glial cells. The effects of the CRF and A_2A receptors ligands on cell viability were measured using propidium iodide and Syto‐13 fluorescence staining. Glutamate decreased cell viability in a concentration‐dependent manner. Urocortin (10 pM), an agonist of CRF receptors, increased cell survival in the presence of glutamate. This neuroprotective effect was abolished by blocking either CRF₁R or CRF₂R with antalarmin (10 nM) or anti‐Sauvagine‐30 (10 nM), respectively. The blockade of A_2A receptors with a selective antagonist SCH 58261 (50 nM) improved cell viability against the glutamate insult. This effect was dependent on CRF₂R, but not on CRF₁R activation. Overall, these data show a protective role of CRF in cortical neurons, against glutamate‐induced death. The neuroprotection achieved by A_2A receptors blockade requires CRF₂R activation. This interaction between the adenosine and CRF receptors can explain the beneficial effects of using A_2A receptor antagonists against stress‐induced noxious effects.     

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor subtypes in mediating neuronal activation of brain areas involved in responses to intracerebroventricular CRF and stress in rats

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) plays an important role in stress responses through activation of its receptor subtypes, CRF1 receptor (CRF₁) and CRF2 receptor (CRF₂). The parvocellular paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVNp), the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA), and the oval nucleus of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNSTov), which are rich in CRF neurons with equivocal expression of CRF₁ and CRF₂, are involved in stress-related responses. In these areas, Fos expression is induced by various stimuli, although the functions of CRF receptor subtypes in stimuli-induced Fos expression are unknown. To elucidate this issue and to examine whether Fos is expressed in CRF or non-CRF neurons in these areas, the effects of antalarmin and antisauvagine-30 (AS-30), CRF₁- and CRF₂-specific antagonists, respectively, on intracerebroventricular (ICV) CRF- or 60 min-restraint-induced Fos expression were examined in rats. ICV CRF increased the number of Fos-positive CRF and non-CRF neurons in the PVNp, with the increases being inhibited by antalarmin in CRF and non-CRF neurons and by AS-30 in CRF neurons. Restraint also increased Fos-positive CRF and non-CRF neurons in the PVNp, with the increases being inhibited by antalarmin in the CRF neurons. ICV CRF also increased Fos-positive non-CRF neurons in the CeA and the BNSTov, which was inhibited by AS-30 in both areas, and inhibited by antalarmin in the BNSTov only. Restraint increased Fos-positive non-CRF neurons in the CeA and BNSTov, with the increases being almost completely inhibited by either antagonist. These results indicate that both ICV CRF and restraint activate both CRF and non-CRF neurons in the PVNp and non-CRF neurons in the CeA and BNSTov, and that the activation is mediated by CRF₁ and/or CRF₂. However, the manner of involvement for CRF₁ and CRF₂ in ICV CRF- and restraint-induced activation of neurons differs with respect to the stimuli and brain areas; being roughly equivalent in the CeA and BNSTov, but different in the PVNp. Furthermore, the non-CRF_1&2-mediated signals seem to primarily play a role in restraint-induced activation of non-CRF neurons in the PVNp since the activation was not inhibited by CRF receptor antagonists.     

The Pseudo Signal Peptide of the Corticotropin-releasing Factor Receptor Type 2a Decreases Receptor Expression and Prevents Gi-mediated Inhibition of Adenylyl Cyclase Activity

The corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 2a (CRF_2(a)R) belongs to the family of G protein-coupled receptors. The receptor possesses an N-terminal pseudo signal peptide that is unable to mediate targeting of the nascent chain to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane during early receptor biogenesis. The pseudo signal peptide remains uncleaved and consequently forms an additional hydrophobic receptor domain with unknown function that is unique within the large G protein-coupled receptor protein family. Here, we have analyzed the functional significance of this domain in comparison with the conventional signal peptide of the homologous corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 (CRF₁R). We show that the presence of the pseudo signal peptide leads to a very low cell surface receptor expression of the CRF_2(a)R in comparison with the CRF₁R. Moreover, whereas the presence of the pseudo signal peptide did not affect coupling to the G_s protein, G_i-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity was abolished. The properties mediated by the pseudo signal peptide were entirely transferable to the CRF₁R in signal peptide exchange experiments. Taken together, our results show that signal peptides do not only influence early protein biogenesis. In the case of the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor subtypes, the use of conventional and pseudo signal peptides have an unexpected influence on signal transduction.     

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor subtypes in mediating neuronal activation of brain areas involved in responses to intracerebroventricular CRF and stress in rats

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) plays an important role in stress responses through activation of its receptor subtypes, CRF1 receptor (CRF₁) and CRF2 receptor (CRF₂). The parvocellular paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVNp), the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA), and the oval nucleus of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNSTov), which are rich in CRF neurons with equivocal expression of CRF₁ and CRF₂, are involved in stress-related responses. In these areas, Fos expression is induced by various stimuli, although the functions of CRF receptor subtypes in stimuli-induced Fos expression are unknown. To elucidate this issue and to examine whether Fos is expressed in CRF or non-CRF neurons in these areas, the effects of antalarmin and antisauvagine-30 (AS-30), CRF₁- and CRF₂-specific antagonists, respectively, on intracerebroventricular (ICV) CRF- or 60 min-restraint-induced Fos expression were examined in rats. ICV CRF increased the number of Fos-positive CRF and non-CRF neurons in the PVNp, with the increases being inhibited by antalarmin in CRF and non-CRF neurons and by AS-30 in CRF neurons. Restraint also increased Fos-positive CRF and non-CRF neurons in the PVNp, with the increases being inhibited by antalarmin in the CRF neurons. ICV CRF also increased Fos-positive non-CRF neurons in the CeA and the BNSTov, which was inhibited by AS-30 in both areas, and inhibited by antalarmin in the BNSTov only. Restraint increased Fos-positive non-CRF neurons in the CeA and BNSTov, with the increases being almost completely inhibited by either antagonist. These results indicate that both ICV CRF and restraint activate both CRF and non-CRF neurons in the PVNp and non-CRF neurons in the CeA and BNSTov, and that the activation is mediated by CRF₁ and/or CRF₂. However, the manner of involvement for CRF₁ and CRF₂ in ICV CRF- and restraint-induced activation of neurons differs with respect to the stimuli and brain areas; being roughly equivalent in the CeA and BNSTov, but different in the PVNp. Furthermore, the non-CRF_1&2-mediated signals seem to primarily play a role in restraint-induced activation of non-CRF neurons in the PVNp since the activation was not inhibited by CRF receptor antagonists.     

Characterization of CRF1 receptor antagonists with differential peripheral vs central actions in CRF challenge in rats

The aim of this study was to investigate peripheral and central roles of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) in endocrinological and behavioral changes. Plasma adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) concentration was measured as an activity of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. As behavioral changes, locomotion and anxiety behavior were measured after CRF challenge intravenously (i.v.) for the peripheral administration or intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) for the central administration. Plasma ACTH concentration was significantly increased by both administration routes of CRF; however, hyperlocomotion and anxiety behavior were induced only by the i.c.v. administration. In the drug discovery of CRF₁ receptor antagonists, we identified two types of compounds, Compound A and Compound B, which antagonized peripheral CRF-induced HPA axis activation to the same extent, but showed different effects on the central CRF signal. These had similar in vitro CRF₁ receptor binding affinities (15 and 10 nM) and functional activities in reporter gene assay (15 and 9.5 nM). In the ex vivo binding assays using tissues of the pituitary, oral treatment with Compound A and Compound B at 10 mg/kg inhibited [¹²⁵I]-CRF binding, whereas in the assay using tissues of the frontal cortex, treatment of Compound A but not Compound B inhibited [¹²⁵I]-CRF binding, indicating that only Compound A inhibited central [¹²⁵I]-CRF binding. In the peripheral CRF challenge, increase in plasma ACTH concentration was significantly suppressed by both Compound A and Compound B. In contrast, Compound A inhibited the increase in locomotion induced by the central CRF challenge while Compound B did not. Compound A also reduced central CRF challenge-induced anxiety behavior and c-fos immunoreactivity in the cortex and the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. These results indicate that the central CRF signal, rather than the peripheral CRF signal would be related to anxiety and other behavioral changes, and CRF₁ receptor antagonism in the central nervous system may be critical for identifying drug candidates for anxiety and mood disorders.     

Corticotropin-releasing factor type-1 receptor antagonists: the next class of antidepressants?

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) is a neuropeptide that plays a primary role in the neuroendocrine, autonomic, and behavioral responses to stressors. Numerous reports suggest that alterations in CRF function contribute to the pathogenesis of depression. Recently, selective nonpeptide CRF type 1 (CRF1) receptor antagonists have been discovered and several of these CRF1 receptor antagonists have demonstrated antidepressant-like efficacy in animals. The CRF1 receptor antagonists appear to be unique, as they exhibit antidepressant-like activity principally in animal models that are hyperresponsive to stress or under experimental conditions that alter endogenous stress-hormone activity. A nonpeptide CRF1 receptor antagonist has also been shown to reduce symptoms of major depression in an open-label clinical trial. Accumulating evidence supports a role for nonpeptide CRF1 receptor antagonists among the future pharmacotherapies for the treatment of depression.     

Interaction of an Amphiphilic Peptide with a Phospholipid Bilayer Surface by Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study

Abstract

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) is the principal neuroregulator of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) secretion. Previous experiments have demonstrated that CRF binds avidly to the surface of single egg phosphatidylcholine vesicles and its amphiphilic secondary structure might play an important role in the function. In this study, the interaction of the residues 13–41 in human CRF with the surface of a DOPC bilayer was investigated by molecular dynamics (MD) simulation in order to understand the role of the membrane surface in the formation of the amphiphilic α helix as well as to determine the effects of the peptide on the lipid bilayer. The model used included 60 DOPC molecules, 1 helical peptide (CRF_13–41) on the bilayer surface, and explicit waters of solvation in the lipid polar head group regions, together with constant-volume periodic boundary conditions in three dimensions. The MD simulation was carried out for 510 ps. In addition, CRF_13–41, initially in a helical form, was simulated in vacuo as a control. The results indicate that while it was completely unstable in vacuo, the peptide helical form was generally maintained on the bilayer surface, but with distortions near the terminal ends. The peptide was confined to the bilayer headgroup/water region, similar to that reported from neutron diffraction measurement of tripeptides bound to the phosphatidylcholine bilayer surface (Ref 1). The amphiphilicity of the peptide matched that of the bilayer headgroup environment, with the hydrophilic side oriented toward water and the hydrophobic side making contact with the bilayer hydrocarbon core. These results support the hypothesis that the amphiphilic environment of a membrane surface is important in the induction of peptide amphiphilic α-helical secondary structure. Two major effects of the peptide on the lipids were found: the first CH₂ segment in the lipid chains was significantly disordered and the lipid headgroup distribution was broadened towards the water region.     

Effects of acidic-astressin and ovine-CRF microinfusions into the ventral hippocampus on defensive behaviors in rats

This study investigated a possible role for ventral hippocampal corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) in modulating both unconditioned and conditioned defensive behaviors by examining the effects of pre-training ventral hippocampal ovine-CRF (oCRF) or acidic-astressin ([Glu^11,16]Ast) microinfusions in male Long-Evans hooded rats exposed to various threat stimuli including the elevated plus-maze (EPM) (oCRF), cat odor (oCRF and [Glu^11,16]Ast) and a live cat ([Glu^11,16]Ast). Unconditioned defensive behaviors were assessed during threat exposure, while conditioned defensive behaviors were assessed in each predator context 24 h after the initial threat encounter. Pre-training infusions of the CRF₁ and CRF₂ receptor agonist oCRF significantly increased defensive behaviors during both the unconditioned and conditioned components of the cat odor test, as well as exposure to the EPM. In contrast to the behavioral effects of oCRF microinfusions, the CRF₁ and CRF₂ receptor antagonist [Glu^11,16]Ast significantly decreased defensive behaviors during exposure to cat odor, while producing no discernible effects following a second injection in the cat exposure test. During conditioned test trials, pre-training infusions of [Glu^11,16]Ast also significantly reduced defensive behaviors during re-exposure to both predator contexts. These results suggest a specific role for ventral hippocampal CRF receptors in modulating anxiety-like behaviors in several ethologically relevant animal models of defense.     

CRF1-R Activation of the Dynorphin/Kappa Opioid System in the Mouse Basolateral Amygdala Mediates Anxiety-Like Behavior

Stress is a complex human experience and having both rewarding and aversive motivational properties. The adverse effects of stress are well documented, yet many of underlying mechanisms remain unclear and controversial. Here we report that the anxiogenic properties of stress are encoded by the endogenous opioid peptide dynorphin acting in the basolateral amygdala. Using pharmacological and genetic approaches, we found that the anxiogenic-like effects of Corticotropin Releasing Factor (CRF) were triggered by CRF₁-R activation of the dynorphin/kappa opioid receptor (KOR) system. Central CRF administration significantly reduced the percent open-arm time in the elevated plus maze (EPM). The reduction in open-arm time was blocked by pretreatment with the KOR antagonist norbinaltorphimine (norBNI), and was not evident in mice lacking the endogenous KOR ligand dynorphin. The CRF₁-R agonist stressin 1 also significantly reduced open-arm time in the EPM, and this decrease was blocked by norBNI. In contrast, the selective CRF₂-R agonist urocortin III did not affect open arm time, and mice lacking CRF₂-R still showed an increase in anxiety-like behavior in response to CRF injection. However, CRF₂-R knockout animals did not develop CRF conditioned place aversion, suggesting that CRF₁-R activation may mediate anxiety and CRF₂-R may encode aversion. Using a phosphoselective antibody (KORp) to identify sites of dynorphin action, we found that CRF increased KORp-immunoreactivity in the basolateral amygdala (BLA) of wildtype, but not in mice pretreated with the selective CRF₁-R antagonist, antalarmin. Consistent with the concept that acute stress or CRF injection-induced anxiety was mediated by dynorphin release in the BLA, local injection of norBNI blocked the stress or CRF-induced increase in anxiety-like behavior; whereas norBNI injection in a nearby thalamic nucleus did not. The intersection of stress-induced CRF and the dynorphin/KOR system in the BLA was surprising, and these results suggest that CRF and dynorphin/KOR systems may coordinate stress-induced anxiety behaviors and aversive behaviors via different mechanisms.     

Discovery of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimido[1,2-a]benzimidazoles as novel class of corticotropin releasing factor 1 receptor antagonists

A new class of corticotropin releasing factor 1 (CRF₁) receptor antagonists characterized by a tricyclic core ring was designed and synthesized. Novel tricyclic derivatives 2a–e were designed as CRF₁ receptor antagonists based on conformation analysis of our original 2-anilinobenzimidazole CRF₁ receptor antagonist. The synthesized tricyclic derivatives 2a–e showed CRF₁ receptor binding activity with IC₅₀ values of less than 400?nM, and the 1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimido-[1,2-a]benzimidazole derivative 2e was selected as a lead compound with potent in vitro CRF₁ receptor binding activity (IC₅₀?=?7.1?nM). To optimize the pharmacokinetic profiles of lead compound 2e, we explored suitable substituents on the 1-position and 6-position, leading to the identification of compound 42c-R, which exhibited potent CRF₁ receptor binding activity (IC₅₀?=?58?nM) with good oral bioavailability (F?=?68% in rats). Compound 42c-R exhibited dose-dependent inhibition of [¹²⁵I]-CRF binding in the frontal cortex (5 and 10?mg/kg, p.o.) as well as suppression of locomotor activation induced by intracerebroventricular administration of CRF in rats (10?mg/kg, p.o.). These results suggest that compound 42c-R successfully binds CRF₁ receptors in the brain and exhibits the potential to be further examined for clinical studies.     

The influence of CRF and alpha-helical CRF(9-41) on rat fear responses, c-Fos and CRF expression, and concentration of amino acids in brain structures

In the present study we have examined the influence of intracerebroventricullary administered CRF, and a non-selective CRF receptor antagonist, α-helical CRF_(9–41), on rat conditioned fear response, serum corticosterone, c-Fos and CRF expression, and concentration of amino acids (in vitro), in several brain structures. Pretreatment of rats with CRF in a dose of 1μg/rat, enhanced rat-freezing response, and further increased conditioned fear-elevated concentration of serum corticosterone. Moreover, exogenous CRF increased aversive context-induced expression of c-Fos in the parvocellular neurons of the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus (pPVN), CA1 area of the hippocampus, and M1 area of the frontal cortex. A different pattern of behavioral and biochemical changes was present after pre-test administration of α-helical CRF_(9–41) (10μg/rat): a decrease in rat fear response and serum corticosterone concentration; an attenuation of fear-induced c-Fos expression in the dentate gyrus, CA1, Cg1, Cg2, and M1 areas of the frontal cortex; a complete reversal of the rise in the number of CRF immunoreactive complexes in the M2 cortical area, induced by conditioned fear. Moreover, α-helical CRF_(9–41) increased the concentration of GABA in the amygdala of fear-conditioned rats. Altogether, the present data confirm and extend previous data on the integrative role of CRF in the central, anxiety-related, behavioral and biochemical processes. The obtained results underline also the role of frontal cortex and amygdala in mediating the effects of CRF on the conditioned fear response.     

PheVI:09 (Phe6.44) as a Sliding Microswitch in Seven-transmembrane (7TM) G Protein-coupled Receptor Activation

In seven-transmembrane (7TM), G protein-coupled receptors, highly conserved residues function as microswitches, which alternate between different conformations and interaction partners in an extended allosteric interface between the transmembrane segments performing the large scale conformational changes upon receptor activation. Computational analysis using x-ray structures of the β₂-adrenergic receptor demonstrated that PheVI:09 (6.44), which in the inactive state is locked between the backbone and two hydrophobic residues in transmembrane (TM)-III, upon activation slides ∼2 Å toward TM-V into a tight pocket generated by five hydrophobic residues protruding from TM-III and TM-V. Of these, the residue in position III:16 (3.40) (often an Ile or Val) appears to function as a barrier or gate for the transition between inactive and active conformation. Mutational analysis showed that PheVI:09 is essential for the constitutive and/or agonist-induced signaling of the ghrelin receptor, GPR119, the β₂-adrenergic receptor, and the neurokinin-1 receptor. Substitution of the residues constituting the hydrophobic pocket between TM-III and TM-V in the ghrelin receptor in four of five positions impaired receptor signaling. In GPR39, representing the 12% of 7TM receptors lacking an aromatic residue at position VI:09, unchanged agonist-induced signaling was observed upon Ala substitution of LeuVI:09 despite reduced cell surface expression of the mutant receptor. It is concluded that PheVI:09 constitutes an aromatic microswitch that stabilizes the active, outward tilted conformation of TM-VI relative to TM-III by sliding into a tight hydrophobic pocket between TM-III and TM-V and that the hydrophobic residue in position III:16 constitutes a gate for this transition.     

Investigation of Interactions at the Extracellular Loops of the Relaxin Family Peptide Receptor 1 (RXFP1)

Relaxin, an emerging pharmaceutical treatment for acute heart failure, activates the relaxin family peptide receptor (RXFP1), which is a class A G-protein-coupled receptor. In addition to the classic transmembrane (TM) domain, RXFP1 possesses a large extracellular domain consisting of 10 leucine-rich repeats and an N-terminal low density lipoprotein class A (LDLa) module. Relaxin-mediated activation of RXFP1 requires multiple coordinated interactions between the ligand and various receptor domains including a high affinity interaction involving the leucine-rich repeats and a predicted lower affinity interaction involving the extracellular loops (ELs). The LDLa is essential for signal activation; therefore the ELs/TM may additionally present an interaction site to facilitate this LDLa-mediated signaling. To overcome the many challenges of investigating relaxin and the LDLa module interactions with the ELs, we engineered the EL1 and EL2 loops onto a soluble protein scaffold, mapping specific ligand and loop interactions using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Key EL residues were subsequently mutated in RXFP1, and changes in function and relaxin binding were assessed alongside the RXFP1 agonist ML290 to monitor the functional integrity of the TM domain of these mutant receptors. The outcomes of this work make an important contribution to understanding the mechanism of RXFP1 activation and will aid future development of small molecule RXFP1 agonists/antagonists.     

Discovery of pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-ones as corticotropin-releasing factor 1 receptor antagonists with a carbonyl-based hydrogen bonding acceptor

A new class of pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-one corticotropin-releasing factor 1 (CRF₁) receptor antagonists has been designed and synthesized. In general, reported CRF₁ receptor antagonists possess a sp²-nitrogen atom as hydrogen bonding acceptor (HBA) on their core scaffolds. We proposed to use a carbonyl group of pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-one derivatives as a replacement for the sp²-nitrogen atom as HBA in classical CRF₁ receptor antagonists. As a result, several pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-one derivatives showed CRF₁ receptor binding affinity with IC₅₀ values in the submicromolar range. Ex vivo ¹²⁵I-sauvagine binding studies showed that 2-(dipropylamino)-3,7-dimethyl-5-(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-3,7-dihydro-4H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-one (16b) (30 mg/kg, po) was able to penetrate into the brain and inhibit radioligand binding to CRF₁ receptors (frontal cortex, olfactory bulb, and pituitary) in mice. We identified pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-one derivatives as the first CRF₁ antagonists with a carbonyl-based HBA.     

Corticotrophin-Releasing Factor (CRF) and the Urocortins Are Potent Regulators of the Inflammatory Phenotype of Human and Mouse White Adipocytes and the Differentiation of Mouse 3T3L1 Pre-Adipocytes

Chronic activation of innate immunity takes place in obesity and initiated by the hypertrophic adipocytes which obtain a pro-inflammatory phenotype. The corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) family of neuropeptides and their receptors (CRF₁ and CRF₂) affect stress response and innate immunity. Adipose tissue expresses a complete CRF system. The aim of this study was to examine the role of CRF neuropeptides in the immune phenotype of adipocytes assessed by their expression of the toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4), the production of inflammatory cytokines IL-6, TNF-α and IL-1β, chemokines IL-8, monocyte attractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and of the adipokines adiponectin, resistin and leptin. Our data are as follows: (a) CRF, UCN2 and UCN3 are expressed in human white adipocytes as well as CRFR_1a, CRFR_2a and CRFR_2b but not CRFR_2c. 3T3L1 pre-adipocytes and differentiated adipocytes expressed both CRF₁ and CRF₂ receptors and UCN3, while UCN2 was detected only in differentiated adipocytes. CRF₂ was up-regulated in mouse mature adipocytes. (b) CRF₁ agonists suppressed media- and LPS-induced pre-adipocyte differentiation while CRF₂ receptor agonists had no effect. (c) In mouse pre-adipocytes, CRF₂ agonists suppressed TLR4 expression and the production of IL-6, CXCL1 and adiponectin while CRF₁ agonists had no effect. (d) In mature mouse adipocytes LPS induced IL-6 and CXCL1 production and suppressed leptin. (e) In human visceral adipocytes LPS induced IL-6, TNF-α, IL-8, MCP-1 and leptin production and suppressed adiponectin and resistin. (f) In mouse mature adipocytes CRF₁ and CRF₂ agonists suppressed basal and LPS-induced production of inflammatory cytokines, TLR4 expression and adiponectin production, while in human visceral adipocytes CRF and UCN1 suppressed basal and LPS-induced IL-6, TNF-α, IL-8 and MCP-1 production. In conclusion, the effects of the activation of CRF₁ and CRF₂ may be significant in ameliorating the pro-inflammatory activity of adipocytes in obesity.     

Dimerization of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Receptor Type 1 Is Not Coupled to Ligand Binding

As described previously, receptor dimerization of G protein-coupled receptors may influence signaling, trafficking, and regulation in vivo. Up to now, most studies aiming at the possible role of receptor dimerization in receptor activation and signal transduction are focused on class A GPCRs. In the present work, the dimerization behavior of the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 (CRF₁R), which belongs to class B of GPCRs and plays an important role in coordination of the immune response, stress, and learning behavior, was investigated by using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). For this purpose, we generated fusion proteins of CRF₁R tagged at their C-terminus to a cyan or yellow fluorescent protein, which can be used as a FRET pair. Binding studies verified that the receptor constructs were able to bind their natural ligands in a manner comparable with the wild-type receptor, whereas cAMP accumulation proved the functionality of the constructs. In microscopic studies, a dimerization of the CRF₁R was observed, but the addition of either CRF-related agonists or antagonists did not show any dose-related increase of the observed FRET signal, indicating that the dimer-monomer ratio is not changed on addition of ligand.     

Pancreatic Polypeptide Is Recognized by Two Hydrophobic Domains of the Human Y4 Receptor Binding Pocket

Structural characterization of the human Y₄ receptor (hY₄R) interaction with human pancreatic polypeptide (hPP) is crucial, not only for understanding its biological function but also for testing treatment strategies for obesity that target this interaction. Here, the interaction of receptor mutants with pancreatic polypeptide analogs was studied through double-cycle mutagenesis. To guide mutagenesis and interpret results, a three-dimensional comparative model of the hY₄R-hPP complex was constructed based on all available class A G protein-coupled receptor crystal structures and refined using experimental data. Our study reveals that residues of the hPP and the hY₄R form a complex network consisting of ionic interactions, hydrophobic interactions, and hydrogen binding. Residues Tyr^2.64, Asp^2.68, Asn^6.55, Asn^7.32, and Phe^7.35 of Y₄R are found to be important in receptor activation by hPP. Specifically, Tyr^2.64 interacts with Tyr²⁷ of hPP through hydrophobic contacts. Asn^7.32 is affected by modifications on position Arg³³ of hPP, suggesting a hydrogen bond between these two residues. Likewise, we find that Phe^7.35 is affected by modifications of hPP at positions 33 and 36, indicating interactions between these three amino acids. Taken together, we demonstrate that the top of transmembrane helix 2 (TM2) and the top of transmembrane helices 6 and 7 (TM6–TM7) form the core of the peptide binding pocket. These findings will contribute to the rational design of ligands that bind the receptor more effectively to produce an enhanced agonistic or antagonistic effect.     

SEB‐3, a CRF receptor‐like GPCR,regulates locomotor activity states,stress responses and ethanol tolerance in Caenorhabditis elegans

The CRF (corticotropin‐releasing factor) system is a key mediator of the stress response. Alterations in CRF signaling have been implicated in drug craving and ethanol consumption. The development of negative reinforcement via activation of brain stress systems has been proposed as a mechanism that contributes to alcohol dependence. Here, we isolated a gain‐of‐function allele of seb‐3, a CRF receptor‐like GPCR in Caenorhabditis elegans, providing an in vivo model of a constitutively activated stress system. We also characterized a loss‐of‐function allele of seb‐3 and showed that SEB‐3 positively regulates a stress response that leads to an enhanced active state of locomotion, behavioral arousal and tremor. SEB‐3 also contributed to acute tolerance to ethanol and to the development of tremor during ethanol withdrawal. Furthermore, we found that a specific CRF₁ receptor antagonist reduced acute functional tolerance to ethanol in mice. These findings demonstrate functional conservation of the CRF system in responses to stress and ethanol in vertebrates and invertebrates.     

Urocortin 3 expression at baseline and during inflammation in the colon: Corticotropin releasing factor receptors cross-talk

Urocortins (Ucn1-3), members of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) family of neuropeptides, are emerging as potent immunomodulators. Localized, cellular expression of Ucn1 and Ucn2, but not Ucn3, has been demonstrated during inflammation. Here, we investigated the role of Ucn3 in a rat model of Crohn's colitis and the relative contribution of CRF receptors (CRF₁ and CRF₂) in regulating Ucn3 expression at baseline and during inflammation. Ucn3 mRNA and peptide were ubiquitously expressed throughout the GI tract in naïve rats. Ucn3 immunoreactivity was seen in epithelial cells and myenteric neurons. On day 1 of colitis, Ucn3 mRNA levels decreased by 80% and did not recover to baseline even by day 9. Next, we ascertained pro- or anti-inflammatory actions of Ucn3 during colitis. Surprisingly, unlike observed anti-inflammatory actions of Ucn1, exogenous Ucn3 did not alter histopathological outcomes during colitis and neither did it alter levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α. At baseline, colon-specific knockdown of CRF₁, but not CRF₂ decreased Ucn3 mRNA by 78%, whereas during colitis, Ucn3 mRNA levels increased after CRF₁ knockdown. In cultured cells, co-expression of CRF₁ + CRF₂ attenuated Ucn3-stimulated intracellular Ca²⁺ peak by 48% as compared to cells expressing CRF₂ alone. Phosphorylation of p38 kinase increased by 250% during colitis and was significantly attenuated after Ucn3 administration. Thus, our results suggest that a balanced and coordinated expression of CRF receptors is required for proper regulation of Ucn3 at baseline and during inflammation.