Requirement for Wnt and FGF signaling in Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration

We have investigated the requirement for the FGF and Wnt/beta-catenin pathways for Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration. Pathways were modified either by treatment with small molecules or by induction of transgene expression with heat shocks. Regeneration is inhibited by treatment with the FGF inhibitor SU5402, or by activation of a dominant negative FGF receptor, or by activation of expression of the Wnt inhibitor Dkk1. Agents promoting Wnt activity: the small molecule BIO, or a constitutively active form of beta-catenin, led to an increased growth rate. Combination of a Wnt activator with FGF inhibitor suppressed regeneration, while combination of a Wnt inhibitor with a FGF activator allowed regeneration. This suggests that the Wnt activity lies upstream of the FGF activity.Expression of both Wnt and FGF components was inhibited by activation of noggin, suggesting that BMP signalling lies upstream of both Wnt and FGF.The results show that the molecular mechanism of Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration is surprisingly similar to that of the Xenopus limb bud and the zebrafish caudal fin, despite the difference of anatomy.     

Skeletal muscle regeneration in Xenopus tadpoles and zebrafish larvae

Background

Mammals are not able to restore lost appendages, while many amphibians are. One important question about epimorphic regeneration is related to the origin of the new tissues and whether they come from mature cells via dedifferentiation and/or from stem cells. Several studies in urodele amphibians (salamanders) indicate that, after limb or tail amputation, the multinucleated muscle fibres do dedifferentiate by fragmentation and proliferation, thereby contributing to the regenerate. In Xenopus laevis tadpoles, however, it was shown that muscle fibres do not contribute directly to the tail regenerate. We set out to study whether dedifferentiation was present during muscle regeneration of the tadpole limb and zebrafish larval tail, mainly by cell tracing and histological observations.

Results

Cell tracing and histological observations indicate that zebrafish tail muscle do not dedifferentiate during regeneration. Technical limitations did not allow us to trace tadpole limb cells, nevertheless we observed no signs of dedifferentiation histologically. However, ultrastructural and gene expression analysis of regenerating muscle in tadpole tail revealed an unexpected dedifferentiation phenotype. Further histological studies showed that dedifferentiating tail fibres did not enter the cell cycle and in vivo cell tracing revealed no evidences of muscle fibre fragmentation. In addition, our results indicate that this incomplete dedifferentiation was initiated by the retraction of muscle fibres.

Conclusions

Our results show that complete skeletal muscle dedifferentiation is less common than expected in lower vertebrates. In addition, the discovery of incomplete dedifferentiation in muscle fibres of the tadpole tail stresses the importance of coupling histological studies with in vivo cell tracing experiments to better understand the regenerative mechanisms.     

YAP‐TEAD signaling promotes basal cell carcinoma development via a c‐JUN/AP1 axis

The mammalian Hippo signaling pathway, through its effectors YAP and TAZ, coerces epithelial progenitor cell expansion for appropriate tissue development or regeneration upon damage. Its ability to drive rapid tissue growth explains why many oncogenic events frequently exploit this pathway to promote cancer phenotypes. Indeed, several tumor types including basal cell carcinoma (BCC) show genetic aberrations in the Hippo (or YAP/TAZ) regulators. Here, we uncover that while YAP is dispensable for homeostatic epidermal regeneration, it is required for BCC development. Our clonal analyses further demonstrate that the few emerging Yap‐null dysplasia have lower fitness and thus are diminished as they progress to invasive BCC. Mechanistically, YAP depletion in BCC tumors leads to effective impairment of the JNK‐JUN signaling, a well‐established tumor‐driving cascade. Importantly, in this context, YAP does not influence canonical Wnt or Hedgehog signaling. Overall, we reveal Hippo signaling as an independent promoter of BCC pathogenesis and thereby a viable target for drug‐resistant BCC.     

Hippo Signaling Regulates Pancreas Development through Inactivation of Yap

The mammalian pancreas is required for normal metabolism, with defects in this vital organ commonly observed in cancer and diabetes. Development must therefore be tightly controlled in order to produce a pancreas of correct size, cell type composition, and physiologic function. Through negative regulation of Yap-dependent proliferation, the Hippo kinase cascade is a critical regulator of organ growth. To investigate the role of Hippo signaling in pancreas biology, we deleted Hippo pathway components in the developing mouse pancreas. Unexpectedly, the pancreas from Hippo-deficient offspring was reduced in size, with defects evident throughout the organ. Increases in the dephosphorylated nuclear form of Yap are apparent throughout the exocrine compartment and correlate with increases in levels of cell proliferation. However, the mutant exocrine tissue displays extensive disorganization leading to pancreatitis-like autodigestion. Interestingly, our results suggest that Hippo signaling does not directly regulate the pancreas endocrine compartment as Yap expression is lost following endocrine specification through a Hippo-independent mechanism. Altogether, our results demonstrate that Hippo signaling plays a crucial role in pancreas development and provide novel routes to a better understanding of pathological conditions that affect this organ.     

Methods of In Vivo Gene-Specific Knockdown Using Morpholino and Vivo-Morpholino Oligonucleotides

The functioning of the small GTPase gene, Ras-dva1, has been studied during regeneration processes of the tadpole tails of the clawed frog Xenopus laevis. For this purpose, we have developed two approaches for the gene knockdown using injections of sequence-specific antisense morpholino oligonucleotides (MO) or vivo-morpholino oligonucleotides (vivo-MO). It has been shown for the first time that intracellular Ras-dva-specific MO injected into Xenopus 4–16 of blastomere embryos or vivo-MO injected directly into the distal part of the tadpole tail at stages 40–41 efficiently inhibit the Ras-dva1 gene functioning and leads to the same morphological malformations of the tail regeneration. Using qRT-PCR, we detected the inhibition of expression of the regeneration marker genes (Fgf20a and Msx1b) on the first day after amputation in the tail tissues of tadpoles with the Ras-dva1 knockdown.     

Morphogenetic control during tail regeneration in Plethodon cinereus: the role of skeletal muscle

The caudal myofibers of Plethodon cinereus do not appear to participate directly in epimorphic tail regeneration following either autotomy or surgical amputation of the tail. The possibility that tail musculature might indirectly influence morphogenesis of the regenerate was tested by unilaterally removing 99% of the lateral muscle mass for five to six caudal segments. Ten days after muscle ablation, tails were amputated through the deficient area. Unlike previous experiences with ambystomid larvae, P. cinereus regulates completely producing a normal tail regenerate and at a rate comparable to that following simple amputation.     

Patterns of Mitosis and Activation of the Map-Kinase Cascade during Tadpole Tail Regeneration in the Refractory Period of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Xenopus laevis</Emphasis> Development

Patterns of mitotic cells’ distribution and activation of the MAP-kinase cascade during the regeneration of Xenopus laevis tadpole tails were studied before and during the refractory period. It is known that the tadpoles of Xenopus laevis are able to fully restore the full structure of the tail after amputation. However, in the refractory period (stage 45–47), the ability to regenerate is significantly reduced, until its complete absence. The mechanisms of this phenomenon are still poorly understood. We conducted a comparative analysis of the average number of mitotic cells on 0–4 days post amputation in normally regenerating tails and in tails amputated during the refractory period. A significant decrease in the number of proliferating cells throughout the surface of the tail in the refractory period compared with their sharp increase in the blastema area in normally regenerating tadpoles was shown. In addition, we detected activation of the MAP-kinase cascade (dpERK1/2) during normal regeneration and demonstrated its full inhibition during the refractory period. At the same time, in the distal part of the tail amputated in the refractory period, activation of the expression of the regenerative marker gene Fgf20 was not detected. Thus, we can conclude that the blocking of the regenerative capacity in tadpoles during the refractory period is accompanied by a sharp suppression of the mitotic activity of the cells and a misregulation of the activation of the Fgf–MAP-kinase cascade in the tail after amputation.