克什米尔蜜蜂病毒(KBV)研究进展

克什米尔蜜蜂病毒(Kashmir bee virus, KBV)作为一种毒力较强的蜜蜂急性病毒,自20世纪70年代被分离鉴定以来,已发现其广泛侵染世界各地的东方蜜蜂Apis cerana和西方蜜蜂Apis mellifera。KBV在蜂群内通过垂直和水平两种方式进行传播,且狄斯瓦螨Varroa destructor在其中扮演着重要角色,这使得KBV的分布范围持续扩散。目前已报道的病毒宿主除蜜蜂外,其还可侵染熊蜂、胡蜂等多种野生授粉昆虫。同时,KBV作为一种典型的双顺反子病毒科病毒,由于其在分子生物学上与同科的蜜蜂急性麻痹病毒(acute bee paralysis virus, ABPV)和以色列急性麻痹病毒(Israeli acute paralysis virus, IAPV)间的高相似性,对该病毒流行性的调查与检测、分类等研究的混乱局面也接踵而至。本文对过去40多年来的KBV相关研究进行综述,以期为KBV及类似昆虫病毒的后续研究提供一定的参考和借鉴,促进养蜂业的健康发展。     

猪肠道冠状病毒与入侵受体氨基肽酶N的相互作用

猪肠道冠状病毒是目前危害养猪产业的重要病原。目前已发现能够感染猪肠道的致病性冠状病毒有4种：猪传染性胃肠炎病毒、猪流行性腹泻病毒、猪丁型冠状病毒和猪肠道甲型冠状病毒。冠状病毒感染宿主的第一步是识别宿主细胞膜受体分子并与之结合,随后启动入侵及膜融合进而使病毒基因组进入宿主细胞内部。因此,冠状病毒受体是决定其宿主范围及组织嗜性的关键因素。确定冠状病毒受体及病毒与受体的结合机制对预防新发病毒及开发冠状病毒治疗性药物具有重要意义。猪传染性胃肠炎病毒利用猪氨基肽酶N（aminopeptidase N,APN）作为感染宿主的功能性受体,并利用唾液酸作为辅助结合因子。猪APN最初也被鉴定为猪流行性腹泻病毒的功能性受体,但近年的研究结果与前面的报道存在较大的差异,产生了较大的争议。最近的研究认为,猪丁型冠状病毒的功能性受体也是APN,并且猪丁型冠状病毒能够利用多个物种的APN作为功能性受体,这与其跨物种传播具有密切关系。最新发现的猪肠道甲型冠状病毒则不使用APN作为其入侵受体。本文综述了前面3种猪肠道病毒感染宿主细胞的受体及结合机制的研究进展,并比较分析了猪APN及唾液酸在不同猪肠道冠状病毒入侵宿主过程中结合方式的异同,为进一步研究新发猪肠道冠状病毒受体提供参考。     

中华蜜蜂NPC1蛋白AcNPC1的原核表达、多克隆抗体制备及功能鉴定

【目的】人类C型尼曼匹克病(Niemann-Pick disease type C, NPC)主要是由NPC1基因突变引起的一类遗传疾病。NPC1蛋白主要负责胞内胆固醇运输,同时也作为病毒侵染宿主细胞的重要受体之一近年来备受关注。本研究旨在探究NPC1蛋白与中华蜜蜂囊状幼虫病毒(Chinese sacbrood virus, CSBV)感染的关系。【方法】通过PCR扩增中华蜜蜂Apis cerana cerana AcNPC1基因;将其克隆至pET-30a原核表达载体,转化至大肠杆菌Escherichia coli Rosetta^TM(DE3)进行IPTG诱导表达,采用镍柱纯化重组蛋白,免疫小鼠制备多克隆抗体。设计并合成AcNPC1 siRNA,添食中华蜜蜂幼虫;运用RT-qPCR检测和分析中华蜜蜂CSBV添毒幼虫中AcNPC1的表达量,以及RNAi干扰后不同时间AcNPC1基因和CSBV病毒衣壳蛋白VP1基因在感染CSBV的中华蜜蜂幼虫中的表达水平。【结果】成功构建重组表达质粒pET-30a-AcNPC1,在大肠杆菌中获得高效表达的重组蛋白,目的蛋白大小约为36...     

丙型肝炎病毒受体研究进展

丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)入侵宿主细胞是在多种受体联合介导下才能完成的复杂过程.我们针对已报道的HCV 可能的细胞受体 CD81、低密度脂蛋白受体、B 族Ⅰ型清道夫受体、紧密连接蛋白家族、表皮生长子受体、酪氨酸激酶 EphA2受体、NPC1L1受体展开介绍,为今后研究和探索新型 HCV 疫苗和药物奠定基础.     

疱疹病毒膜融合的分子机制

囊膜病毒与宿主细胞的膜融合是病毒入侵宿主细胞的重要过程,这一过程涉及到病毒囊膜表面糖蛋白与宿主细胞表面受体之间的相互作用和构象变化．疱疹病毒有多个糖蛋白及不同类型的细胞作用受体,相应的受体-糖蛋白复合体构成方式也有多种,其引致的膜融合机制被认为是目前病毒融合机制研究中最复杂的,近年来被广泛研究并取得突破性进展．从病毒糖蛋白与相应受体的结构与功能、受体-糖蛋白复合体的形成与入侵途径,以及膜融合模式几个方面,全面综述疱疹病毒膜融合的分子机制,并展望了未来研究趋势．     

综述: 病毒与宿主细胞的糖基化修饰及相关功能

病毒的复制和对宿主的入侵与自身结构蛋白的糖基化修饰密切相关．对于宿主而言,在病毒感染宿主和宿主抗病毒的过程中,宿主的糖基化过程一方面可抑制病毒的复制和入侵,另一方面可促进病毒对宿主的感染,抑制宿主糖苷酶可抑制病毒的复制．从病毒方面来看,由于病毒自身缺乏糖基化修饰系统,病毒的糖基化过程是借宿主细胞内的合成系统对自身进行糖基化修饰．病毒的糖基化过程对病毒蛋白的折叠与稳定、病毒的感染和入侵、参与识别宿主细胞受体和参与病毒的免疫逃逸等过程起着重要的作用．随着糖基化研究技术的发展,以糖基化为基础的功能应用也越来越深入：如新型病毒疫苗和新型抗病毒药物的研制,以糖蛋白质组学研究为基础的质谱技术和生物信息学方法的发展,以及利用糖基化对病毒性疾病的诊断和治疗等,这些均为糖基化深入研究发展奠定了基础．本文就病毒与宿主细胞糖基化过程、相关功能以及研究应用等进展作一综述．     

冠状病毒S蛋白N-端结构域在病毒入侵过程中的作用机制

冠状病毒(coronavirus)是单股正链RNA病毒,可以引起包括人类在内的多种动物的呼吸道、胃肠道和中枢神经系统疾病。病毒刺突蛋白(spike protein,S蛋白)的S1亚基的N-端结构域(N-terminal domain,NTD)和C-端结构域(C-terminal domain,CTD)都可以作为受体结合域(receptor-binding domain,RBD),且是病毒入侵宿主细胞的关键因素。一般认为,在病毒入侵过程中,S1-NTD主要通过识别并结合糖类受体(attachment receptors)来辅助S1-CTD特异性识别蛋白质受体[小鼠肝炎病毒(mouse hepatitis virus,MHV)除外]。然而,随着对新冠病毒的深入研究,发现S1-NTD也可以识别多种蛋白受体,其作用机理与特点也逐渐被揭示。该文综述了冠状病毒的S1-NTD与受体识别的结构基础,总结了冠状病毒S1-NTD的进化过程,有利于深入理解冠状病毒入侵宿主细胞机制和病毒跨物种传播机制,并为基于NTD的药物及疫苗的开发提供参考。     

植物病毒病媒介昆虫的传毒特性和机制研究进展

植物病毒病是农作物的“癌症”, 至今缺少有效的防治方法。目前已知80%的植物病毒病依赖于媒介昆虫传播, 而媒介昆虫对植物病毒的传播是一个昆虫、 病毒、 寄主植物互作的过程, 历经获毒、 持毒和传毒等多个阶段, 昆虫体内一系列病毒受体或蛋白参与了这个过程。昆虫传播病毒的方式有口针携带式、 前肠保留式和体内循环式3类, 它们各自对应的持久性为非持久性、 半持久性和持久性, 不同昆虫获取这3类病毒的获毒时间、 在体内存留位置和传毒时间也各不相同。 这个过程受到媒介昆虫的性别及龄期、 寄主植物、 环境条件、 昆虫体内共生菌等多种因素的影响。与之相关的蛋白主要有病毒衣壳蛋白(CP)、 次要衣壳蛋白（CPm）、 GroEL蛋白、 辅助因子(HC)和下颚口针蛋白等。近年来对植物病毒基因组的研究也取得了很大的进展, 对昆虫传毒机制的研究正受到越来越广泛的关注。本文综述了近年来该领域内的相关研究进展, 包括昆虫传播植物病毒的传毒方式、 影响传毒效率的因素、 传毒机制特别是昆虫体内与病毒传播可能相关的受体等。     

病毒与宿主细胞的糖基化修饰及相关功能

病毒的复制和对宿主的入侵与自身结构蛋白的糖基化修饰密切相关.对于宿主而言,在病毒感染宿主和宿主抗病毒的过程中,宿主的糖基化过程一方面可抑制病毒的复制和入侵,另一方面可促进病毒对宿主的感染,抑制宿主糖苷酶可抑制病毒的复制.从病毒方面来看,由于病毒自身缺乏糖基化修饰系统,病毒的糖基化过程是借宿主细胞内的合成系统对自身进行糖基化修饰.病毒的糖基化过程对病毒蛋白的折叠与稳定、病毒的感染和入侵、参与识别宿主细胞受体和参与病毒的免疫逃逸等过程起着重要的作用.随着糖基化研究技术的发展,以糖基化为基础的功能应用也越来越深入:如新型病毒疫苗和新型抗病毒药物的研制,以糖蛋白质组学研究为基础的质谱技术和生物信息学方法的发展,以及利用糖基化对病毒性疾病的诊断和治疗等,这些均为糖基化深入研究发展奠定了基础.本文就病毒与宿主细胞糖基化过程、相关功能以及研究应用等进展作一综述.     

冠状病毒S蛋白及其受体的结构和功能

冠状病毒是有包膜的单股正链RNA病毒。作为人和动物的重要致病原,冠状病毒感染主要导致宿主呼吸系统、肝脏、胃肠道以及神经系统出现急性或慢性症状。2000年以来,传染性非典型肺炎和中东呼吸综合征的暴发,以及猪流行性腹泻病毒在全球猪群中的暴发流行,引起大家对动物冠状病毒的极大重视。S蛋白具有受体结合活性和膜融合活性,是冠状病毒感染细胞的关键蛋白;S蛋白在病毒的组织或宿主嗜性和毒力等方面发挥重要作用。本文重点对近年来冠状病毒S蛋白的结构、功能以及S蛋白与受体相互作用的研究进行综述,以期为冠状病毒的入侵机制和反向遗传学研究以及受体阻断药物的开发提供参考。     

Viral Infection Affects Sucrose Responsiveness and Homing Ability of Forager Honey Bees,Apis mellifera L.

Honey bee health is mainly affected by Varroa destructor, viruses, Nosema spp., pesticide residues and poor nutrition. Interactions between these proposed factors may be responsible for the colony losses reported worldwide in recent years. In the present study, the effects of a honey bee virus, Israeli acute paralysis virus (IAPV), on the foraging behaviors and homing ability of European honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) were investigated based on proboscis extension response (PER) assays and radio frequency identification (RFID) systems. The pollen forager honey bees originated from colonies that had no detectable level of honey bee viruses and were manually inoculated with IAPV to induce the viral infection. The results showed that IAPV-inoculated honey bees were more responsive to low sucrose solutions compared to that of non-infected foragers. After two days of infection, around 10⁷ copies of IAPV were detected in the heads of these honey bees. The homing ability of IAPV-infected foragers was depressed significantly in comparison to the homing ability of uninfected foragers. The data provided evidence that IAPV infection in the heads may enable the virus to disorder foraging roles of honey bees and to interfere with brain functions that are responsible for learning, navigation, and orientation in the honey bees, thus, making honey bees have a lower response threshold to sucrose and lose their way back to the hive.     

The Acute bee paralysis virus–Kashmir bee virus–Israeli acute paralysis virus complex

Acute bee paralysis virus (ABPV), Kashmir bee virus (KBV) and Israeli acute paralysis virus (IAPV) are part of a complex of closely related viruses from the Family Dicistroviridae. These viruses have a widespread prevalence in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies and a predominantly sub-clinical etiology that contrasts sharply with the extremely virulent pathology encountered at elevated titres, either artificially induced or encountered naturally. These viruses are frequently implicated in honey bee colony losses, especially when the colonies are infested with the parasitic mite Varroa destructor. Here we review the historical and recent literature of this virus complex, covering history and origins; the geographic, host and tissue distribution; pathology and transmission; genetics and variation; diagnostics, and discuss these within the context of the molecular and biological similarities and differences between the viruses. We also briefly discuss three recent developments relating specifically to IAPV, concerning its association with Colony Collapse Disorder, treatment of IAPV infection with siRNA and possible honey bee resistance to IAPV.     

Lower Virus Infections in Varroa destructor-Infested and Uninfested Brood and Adult Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) of a Low Mite Population Growth Colony Compared to a High Mite Population Growth Colony

A comparison was made of the prevalence and relative quantification of deformed wing virus (DWV), Israeli acute paralysis virus (IAPV), black queen cell virus (BQCV), Kashmir bee virus (KBV), acute bee paralysis virus (ABPV) and sac brood virus (SBV) in brood and adult honey bees (Apis mellifera) from colonies selected for high (HMP) and low (LMP) Varroa destructor mite population growth. Two viruses, ABPV and SBV, were never detected. For adults without mite infestation, DWV, IAPV, BQCV and KBV were detected in the HMP colony; however, only BQCV was detected in the LMP colony but at similar levels as in the HMP colony. With mite infestation, the four viruses were detected in adults of the HMP colony but all at higher amounts than in the LMP colony. For brood without mite infestation, DWV and IAPV were detected in the HMP colony, but no viruses were detected in the LMP colony. With mite infestation of brood, the four viruses were detected in the HMP colony, but only DWV and IAPV were detected and at lower amounts in the LMP colony. An epidemiological explanation for these results is that pre-experiment differences in virus presence and levels existed between the HMP and LMP colonies. It is also possible that low V. destructor population growth in the LMP colony resulted in the bees being less exposed to the mite and thus less likely to have virus infections. LMP and HMP bees may have also differed in susceptibility to virus infection.     

Viral impacts on honey bee populations: A review

Honey bee is vital for pollination and ecological services, boosting crops productivity in terms of quality and quantity and production of colony products: wax, royal jelly, bee venom, honey, pollen and propolis. Honey bees are most important plant pollinators and almost one third of diet depends on bee’s pollination, worth billions of dollars. Hence the role that honey bees have in environment and their economic importance in food production, their health is of dominant significance. Honey bees can be infected by various pathogens like: viruses, bacteria, fungi, or infested by parasitic mites. At least more than 20 viruses have been identified to infect honey bees worldwide, generally from Dicistroviridae as well as Iflaviridae families, like ABPV (Acute Bee Paralysis Virus), BQCV (Black Queen Cell Virus), KBV (Kashmir Bee Virus), SBV (Sacbrood Virus), CBPV (Chronic bee paralysis virus), SBPV (Slow Bee Paralysis Virus) along with IAPV (Israeli acute paralysis virus), and DWV (Deformed Wing Virus) are prominent and cause infections harmful for honey bee colonies health. This issue about honey bee viruses demonstrates remarkably how diverse this field is, and considerable work has to be done to get a comprehensive interpretation of the bee virology.     

Molecular and phylogenetic characterization of honey bee viruses,Nosema microsporidia,protozoan parasites,and parasitic mites in China

China has the largest number of managed honey bee colonies, which produce the highest quantity of honey and royal jelly in the world; however, the presence of honey bee pathogens and parasites has never been rigorously identified in Chinese apiaries. We thus conducted a molecular survey of honey bee RNA viruses, Nosema microsporidia, protozoan parasites, and tracheal mites associated with nonnative Apis mellifera ligustica and native Apis cerana cerana colonies in China. We found the presence of black queen cell virus (BQCV), chronic bee paralysis virus (CBPV), deformed wing virus (DWV), Israeli acute paralysis virus (IAPV), and sacbrood virus (SBV), but not that of acute bee paralysis virus (ABPV) or Kashmir bee virus (KBV). DWV was the most prevalent in the tested samples. Phylogenies of Chinese viral isolates demonstrated that genetically heterogeneous populations of BQCV, CBPV, DWV, and A. cerana‐infecting SBV, and relatively homogenous populations of IAPV and A. meliifera‐infecting new strain of SBV with single origins, are spread in Chinese apiaries. Similar to previous observations in many countries, Nosema ceranae, but not Nosema apis, was prevalent in the tested samples. Crithidia mellificae, but not Apicystis bombi was found in five samples, including one A. c. cerana colony, demonstrating that C. mellificae is capable of infecting multiple honey bee species. Based on kinetoplast‐encoded cytochrome b sequences, the C. mellificae isolate from A. c. cerana represents a novel haplotype with 19 nucleotide differences from the Chinese and Japanese isolates from A. m. ligustica. This suggests that A. c. cerana is the native host for this specific haplotype. The tracheal mite, Acarapis woodi, was detected in one A. m. ligustica colony. Our results demonstrate that honey bee RNA viruses, N. ceranae, C. mellificae, and tracheal mites are present in Chinese apiaries, and some might be originated from native Asian honey bees.     

Infestation of Japanese Native Honey Bees by Tracheal Mite and Virus from Non-native European Honey Bees in Japan

Invasion of alien species has been shown to cause detrimental effects on habitats of native species. Insect pollinators represent such examples; the introduction of commercial bumble bee species for crop pollination has resulted in competition for an ecological niche with native species, genetic disturbance caused by mating with native species, and pathogen spillover to native species. The European honey bee, Apis mellifera, was first introduced into Japan for apiculture in 1877, and queen bees have been imported from several countries for many years. However, its effects on Japanese native honey bee, Apis cerana japonica, have never been addressed. We thus conducted the survey of honey bee viruses and Acarapis mites using both A. mellifera and A. c. japonica colonies to examine their infestation in native and non-native honey bee species in Japan. Honey bee viruses, Deformed wing virus (DWV), Black queen cell virus (BQCV), Israeli acute paralysis virus (IAPV), and Sacbrood virus (SBV), were found in both A. mellifera and A. c. japonica colonies; however, the infection frequency of viruses in A. c. japonica was lower than that in A. mellifera colonies. Based on the phylogenies of DWV, BQCV, and SBV isolates from A. mellifera and A. c. japonica, DWV and BQCV may infect both honey bee species; meanwhile, SBV has a clear species barrier. For the first time in Japan, tracheal mite (Acarapis woodi) was specifically found in the dead honey bees from collapsing A. c. japonica colonies. This paper thus provides further evidence that tracheal-mite-infested honey bee colonies can die during cool winters with no other disease present. These results demonstrate the infestation of native honey bees by parasite and pathogens of non-native honey bees that are traded globally.     

Medium for development of bee cell cultures (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Apis mellifera</Emphasis>: Hymenoptera: Apidae)

A media for the production of cell cultures from hymenopteran species such as honey bee, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) was developed. Multiple bee cell cultures were produced when using bee larvae and pupae as starting material and modified Hert–Hunter 70 media. Cell culture systems for bees solves an impasse that has hindered efforts to isolate and screen pathogens which may be influencing or causing colony collapse disorder of bees. Multiple life stages of maturing larvae to early pupae were used to successfully establish cell cultures from the tissues of the head, thorax, and abdomen. Multiple cell types were observed which included free-floating suspensions, fibroblast-like, and epithelia-like monolayers. The final culture medium, WH2, was originally developed for hemipterans, Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri, and leafhopper, Homalodisca vitripennis cell cultures but has been shown to work for a diverse range of insect species such as bees. Bee cell cultures had various doubling times at 21–23°C ranging from 9–15 d. Deformed wing virus was detected in the primary explanted tissues, which tested negative by rt-PCR for Israeli acute paralysis virus (IAPV), Kashmir bee virus, acute bee paralysis virus, and black queen cell virus. Culture inoculation with IAPV from an isolate from Florida field samples, was detectable in cell cultures after two subcultures. Cell culture from hymenoptera species, such as bees, greatly advances the approaches available to the field of study on colony collapse disorders.     

Viral transmission in honey bees and native bees,supported by a global black queen cell virus phylogeny

In recent decades, we have realized that honey bee viruses are not, in fact, exclusive to honey bees. The potential impact of Apis-affiliated viruses on native pollinators is prompting concern. Our research addresses the issue of virus crossover between honey bees and native bees foraging in the same localities. We measured the presence of black queen cell virus (BQCV), deformed wing virus (DWV) and sacbrood virus (SBV) in managed Apis mellifera (honey bees) and native Andrena spp. (subgenus Melandrena) bee populations in five commercial orchards. We identified viral presence across sites and bees and related these data to measures of bee community diversity. All viruses were found in both managed and native bees, and BQCV was the most common virus in each. To establish evidence for viral crossover between taxa, we undertook an additional examination of BQCV where 74 samples were sequenced and placed in a global phylogenic framework of hundreds of BQCV strains. We demonstrate pathogen sharing across managed honey bees and distantly related wild bees. This phylogenetic analysis contributes to growing evidence for host switching and places local incidence patterns in a worldwide context, revealing multispecies viral transmission.