Cohesins and condensins orchestrate the 4D dynamics of yeast chromosomes during the cell cycle

Duplication and segregation of chromosomes involves dynamic reorganization of their internal structure by conserved architectural proteins, including the structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes cohesin and condensin. Despite active investigation of the roles of these factors, a genome‐wide view of dynamic chromosome architecture at both small and large scale during cell division is still missing. Here, we report the first comprehensive 4D analysis of the higher‐order organization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome throughout the cell cycle and investigate the roles of SMC complexes in controlling structural transitions. During replication, cohesion establishment promotes numerous long‐range intra‐chromosomal contacts and correlates with the individualization of chromosomes, which culminates at metaphase. In anaphase, mitotic chromosomes are abruptly reorganized depending on mechanical forces exerted by the mitotic spindle. Formation of a condensin‐dependent loop bridging the centromere cluster with the rDNA loci suggests that condensin‐mediated forces may also directly facilitate segregation. This work therefore comprehensively recapitulates cell cycle‐dependent chromosome dynamics in a unicellular eukaryote, but also unveils new features of chromosome structural reorganization during highly conserved stages of cell division.     

Complement factor H allotype 402H is associated with increased C3b opsonization and phagocytosis of Streptococcus pyogenes

The mechanisms driving bacterial chromosome segregation remain poorly characterized. While a number of factors influencing chromosome segregation have been described in recent years, none of them appeared to play an essential role in the process comparable to the eukaryotic centromere/spindle complex. The research community involved in bacterial chromosome was becoming familiar with the fact that bacteria have selected multiple redundant systems to ensure correct chromosome segregation. Over the past few years a new perspective came out that entropic forces generated by the confinement of the chromosome in the crowded nucleoid shell could be sufficient to segregate the chromosome. The segregating factors would only be required to create adequate conditions for entropy to do its job. In the article by Yazdi et al. ( 2012 ) in this issue of Molecular Microbiology, this model was challenged experimentally in live Escherichia coli cells. A Fis–GFP fusion was used to follow nucleoid choreography and analyse it from a polymer physics perspective. Their results suggest strongly that E. coli nucleoids behave as self‐adherent polymers. Such a structuring and the specific segregation patterns observed do not support an entropic like segregation model. Are we back to the pre‐entropic era?     

The chromosome cycle of prokaryotes

In both eukaryotes and prokaryotes, chromosomal DNA undergoes replication, condensation–decondensation and segregation, sequentially, in some fixed order. Other conditions, like sister‐chromatid cohesion (SCC), may span several chromosomal events. One set of these chromosomal transactions within a single cell cycle constitutes the ‘chromosome cycle’. For many years it was generally assumed that the prokaryotic chromosome cycle follows major phases of the eukaryotic one: –replication–condensation–segregation–(cell division)–decondensation–, with SCC of unspecified length. Eventually it became evident that, in contrast to the strictly consecutive chromosome cycle of eukaryotes, all stages of the prokaryotic chromosome cycle run concurrently. Thus, prokaryotes practice ‘progressive’ chromosome segregation separated from replication by a brief SCC, and all three transactions move along the chromosome at the same fast rate. In other words, in addition to replication forks, there are ‘segregation forks’ in prokaryotic chromosomes. Moreover, the bulk of prokaryotic DNA outside the replication–segregation transition stays compacted. I consider possible origins of this concurrent replication–segregation and outline the ‘nucleoid administration’ system that organizes the dynamic part of the prokaryotic chromosome cycle.     

Developmental stage influences chromosome segregation patterns and arrangement in the extremely polyploid,giant bacterium Epulopiscium sp. type B

Few studies have described chromosomal dynamics in bacterial cells with more than two complete chromosome copies or described changes with respect to development in polyploid cells. We examined the arrangement of chromosomal loci in the very large, highly polyploid, uncultivated intestinal symbiont Epulopiscium sp. type B using fluorescent in situ hybridization. We found that in new offspring, chromosome replication origins (oriCs) are arranged in a three‐dimensional array throughout the cytoplasm. As development progresses, most oriCs become peripherally located. Siblings within a mother cell have similar numbers of oriCs. When chromosome orientation was assessed in situ by labeling two chromosomal regions, no specific pattern was detected. The Epulopiscium genome codes for many of the conserved positional guide proteins used for chromosome segregation in bacteria. Based on this study, we present a model that conserved chromosomal maintenance proteins, combined with entropic demixing, provide the forces necessary for distributing oriCs. Without the positional regulation afforded by radial confinement, chromosomes are more randomly oriented in Epulopiscium than in most small rod‐shaped cells. Furthermore, we suggest that the random orientation of individual chromosomes in large polyploid cells would not hamper reproductive success as it would in smaller cells with more limited genomic resources.     

Cell shape and chromosome partition in prokaryotes or,why E. coli is rod-shaped and haploid

In the rod-shaped cells of E. coli, chromosome segregation takes place immediately after replication has been completed. A septum then forms between the two sister chromosomes. In the absence of certain membrane proteins, cells grow instead as large, multichromosomal spheres that divide successively in planes that are at right angles to one another. Although multichromosomal, the spherical cells cannot be maintained as heterozygotes. These observations imply that, in these mutants, each individual chromosome gives rise to a separate clone of descendant cells. This suggests a model in which sites for cell division form between pairs of sister chromosomes at the time of segregation, but are not used in spherical cells until further rounds of replication have taken place, thus ensuring clonal (‘hierarchical’) segregation of chromosomes into progeny cells. The role of the morphogenetic membrane proteins is to convert the basically spherical cell into a cylinder that is able to divide as soon as replication and segregation have been completed, and thus to maximise the number of viable cells per genome.     

In long bacterial cells,the Min system can act off‐center

In many rod‐shaped bacteria, the Min system is well‐known for generating a cell‐pole to cell‐pole standing wave oscillation with a single node at mid‐cell to align cell division. In filamentous E. coli cells, the single‐node standing wave transitions into a multi‐nodal oscillation. These multi‐nodal dynamics have largely been treated simply as an interesting byproduct of artificially elongated cells. However, a recent in vivo study by Muraleedharan et al. shows how multi‐nodal Min dynamics are used to align non‐mid‐cell divisions in the elongated swarmer cells of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. The authors propose a model where the combined actions of cell‐length dependent Min dynamics, in concert with nucleoid occlusion along the cell length and regulation of FtsZ levels ensures Z ring formation and complete chromosome segregation at a single off‐center position. By limiting the number of cell division events to one per cell at an off‐center position, long swarmer cells are preserved within a multiplying population. The findings unveil an elegant mechanism of cell‐division regulation by the Min system that allows long swarmer cells to divide without the need to ‘dedifferentiate’.     

Spatial and Temporal Organization of Chromosome Duplication and Segregation in the Cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942

The spatial and temporal control of chromosome duplication and segregation is crucial for proper cell division. While this process is well studied in eukaryotic and some prokaryotic organisms, relatively little is known about it in prokaryotic polyploids such as Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942, which is known to possess one to eight copies of its single chromosome. Using a fluorescent repressor-operator system, S. elongatus chromosomes and chromosome replication forks were tagged and visualized. We found that chromosomal duplication is asynchronous and that the total number of chromosomes is correlated with cell length. Thus, replication is independent of cell cycle and coupled to cell growth. Replication events occur in a spatially random fashion. However, once assembled, replisomes move in a constrained manner. On the other hand, we found that segregation displays a striking spatial organization in some cells. Chromosomes transiently align along the major axis of the cell and timing of alignment was correlated to cell division. This mechanism likely contributes to the non-random segregation of chromosome copies to daughter cells.     

Dynein participates in chromosome segregation in fission yeast

Background information. In eukaryotic cells, proper formation of the spindle is necessary for successful cell division. For faithful segregation of sister chromatids, each sister kinetochore must attach to microtubules that extend to opposite poles (chromosome bi‐orientation). At the metaphase—anaphase transition, cohesion between sister chromatids is removed, and each sister chromatid is pulled to opposite poles of the cell by microtubule‐dependent forces. Results. We have studied the role of the minus‐end‐directed motor protein dynein by analysing kinetochore dynamics in fission yeast cells deleted for the dynein heavy chain (Dhc1) or the light chain (Dlc1). In these mutants, we found an increased frequency of cells showing defects in chromosome segregation, which leads to the appearance of lagging chromosomes and an increased rate of chromosome loss. By following simultaneously kinetochore dynamics and localization of the checkpoint protein Mad2, we provide evidence that dynein function is not necessary for spindle‐assembly checkpoint inactivation. Instead, we have demonstrated that loss of dynein function alters chromosome segregation and activates the Mad2‐dependent spindle‐assembly checkpoint. Conclusions. These results show an unexpected role for dynein in the control of chromosome segregation in fission yeast, most probably operating during the process of bi‐orientation during early mitosis.     

Noc protein binds to specific DNA sequences to coordinate cell division with chromosome segregation

Coordination of chromosome segregation and cytokinesis is crucial for efficient cell proliferation. In Bacillus subtilis, the nucleoid occlusion protein Noc protects the chromosomes by associating with the chromosome and preventing cell division in its vicinity. Using protein localization, ChAP‐on‐Chip and bioinformatics, we have identified a consensus Noc‐binding DNA sequence (NBS), and have shown that Noc is targeted to about 70 discrete regions scattered around the chromosome, though absent from a large region around the replication terminus. Purified Noc bound specifically to an NBS in vitro. NBSs inserted near the replication terminus bound Noc–YFP and caused a delay in cell division. An autonomous plasmid carrying an NBS array recruited Noc–YFP and conferred a severe Noc‐dependent inhibition of cell division. This shows that Noc is a potent inhibitor of division, but that its activity is strictly localized by the interaction with NBS sites in vivo. We propose that Noc serves not only as a spatial regulator of cell division to protect the nucleoid, but also as a timing device with an important role in the coordination of chromosome segregation and cell division.     

Variation of the folding and dynamics of the Escherichia coli chromosome with growth conditions

We examine whether the Escherichia coli chromosome is folded into a self‐adherent nucleoprotein complex, or alternately is a confined but otherwise unconstrained self‐avoiding polymer. We address this through in vivo visualization, using an inducible GFP fusion to the nucleoid‐associated protein Fis to non‐specifically decorate the entire chromosome. For a range of different growth conditions, the chromosome is a compact structure that does not fill the volume of the cell, and which moves from the new pole to the cell centre. During rapid growth, chromosome segregation occurs well before cell division, with daughter chromosomes coupled by a thin inter‐daughter filament before complete segregation, whereas during slow growth chromosomes stay adjacent until cell division occurs. Image correlation analysis indicates that sub‐nucleoid structure is stable on a 1 min timescale, comparable to the timescale for redistribution time measured for GFP–Fis after photobleaching. Optical deconvolution and writhe calculation analysis indicate that the nucleoid has a large‐scale coiled organization rather than being an amorphous mass. Our observations are consistent with the chromosome having a self‐adherent filament organization.     

Incomplete sister chromatid separation of long chromosome arms

Chromosome segregation ensures the equal partitioning of chromosomes at mitosis. However, long chromosome arms may pose a problem for complete sister chromatid separation. In this paper we report on the analysis of cell division in primary cells from field vole Microtus agrestis, a species with 52 chromosomes including two giant sex chromosomes. Dual chromosome painting with probes specific for the X and the Y chromosomes showed that these long chromosomes are prone to mis-segregate, producing DNA bridges between daughter nuclei and micronuclei. Analysis of mitotic cells with incomplete chromatid separation showed that reassembly of the nuclear membrane, deposition of INner CENtromere Protein (INCENP)/Aurora B to the spindle midzone and furrow formation occur while the two groups of daughter chromosomes are still connected by sex chromosome arms. Late cytokinetic processes are not efficiently inhibited by the incomplete segregation as in a significant number of cell divisions cytoplasmic abscission proceeds while Aurora B is at the midbody. Live-cell imaging during late mitotic stages also revealed abnormal cell division with persistent sister chromatid connections. We conclude that late mitotic regulatory events do not monitor incomplete sister chromatid separation of the large X and Y chromosomes of Microtus agrestis, leading to defective segregation of these chromosomes. These findings suggest a limit in chromosome arm length for efficient chromosome transmission through mitosis.Electronic supplementary material Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at and is accessible for authorized users.     

Analysis of Single Locus Trajectories for Extracting In Vivo Chromatin Tethering Interactions

Is it possible to extract tethering forces applied on chromatin from the statistics of a single locus trajectories imaged in vivo? Chromatin fragments interact with many partners such as the nuclear membrane, other chromosomes or nuclear bodies, but the resulting forces cannot be directly measured in vivo. However, they impact chromatin dynamics and should be reflected in particular in the motion of a single locus. We present here a method based on polymer models and statistics of single trajectories to extract the force characteristics and in particular when they are generated by the gradient of a quadratic potential well. Using numerical simulations of a Rouse polymer and live cell imaging of the MAT-locus located on the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome III, we recover the amplitude and the distance between the observed and the interacting monomer. To conclude, the confined trajectories we observed in vivo reflect local interaction on chromatin.     

Dysfunctional MreB inhibits chromosome segregation in Escherichia coli

The mechanism of prokaryotic chromosome segregation is not known. MreB, an actin homolog, is a shape-determining factor in rod-shaped prokaryotic cells. Using immunofluorescence microscopy we found that MreB of Escherichia coli formed helical filaments located beneath the cell surface. Flow cytometric and cytological analyses indicated that MreB-depleted cells segregated their chromosomes in pairs, consistent with chromosome cohesion. Overexpression of wild-type MreB inhibited cell division but did not perturb chromosome segregation. Overexpression of mutant forms of MreB inhibited cell division, caused abnormal MreB filament morphology and induced severe localization defects of the nucleoid and of the oriC and terC chromosomal regions. The chromosomal terminus regions appeared cohered in both MreB-depleted cells and in cells overexpressing mutant forms of MreB. Our observations indicate that MreB filaments participate in directional chromosome movement and segregation.     

Bacterial cell division: regulating Z-ring formation

The earliest stage of cell division in bacteria is the formation of a Z ring, composed of a polymer of the FtsZ protein, at the division site. Z rings appear to be synthesized in a bi‐directional manner from a nucleation site (NS) located on the inside of the cytoplasmic membrane. It is the utilization of a NS specifically at the site of septum formation that determines where and when division will occur. However, a Z ring can be made to form at positions other than at the division site. How does a cell regulate utilization of a NS at the correct location and at the right time? In rod‐shaped bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, two factors involved in this regulation are the Min system and nucleoid occlusion. It is suggested that in B. subtilis, the main role of the Min proteins is to inhibit division at the nucleoid‐free cell poles. In E. coli it is currently not clear whether the Min system can direct a Z ring to the division site at mid‐cell or whether its main role is to ensure that division inhibition occurs away from mid‐cell, a role analogous to that in B. subtilis. While the nucleoid negatively influences Z‐ring formation in its vicinity in these rod‐shaped organisms, the exact relationship between nucleoid occlusion and the ability to form a mid‐cell Z ring is unresolved. Recent evidence suggests that in B. subtilis and Caulobacter crescentus, utilization of the NS at the division site is intimately linked to the progress of a round of chromosome replication and this may form the basis of achieving co‐ordination between chromosome replication and cell division.     

Nucleoid occlusion protein Noc recruits DNA to the bacterial cell membrane

To proliferate efficiently, cells must co‐ordinate division with chromosome segregation. In Bacillus subtilis, the nucleoid occlusion protein Noc binds to specific DNA sequences (NBSs) scattered around the chromosome and helps to protect genomic integrity by coupling the initiation of division to the progression of chromosome replication and segregation. However, how it inhibits division has remained unclear. Here, we demonstrate that Noc associates with the cell membrane via an N‐terminal amphipathic helix, which is necessary for function. Importantly, the membrane‐binding affinity of this helix is weak and requires the assembly of nucleoprotein complexes, thus establishing a mechanism for DNA‐dependent activation of Noc. Furthermore, division inhibition by Noc requires recruitment of NBS DNA to the cell membrane and is dependent on its ability to bind DNA and membrane simultaneously. Indeed, Noc production in a heterologous system is sufficient for recruitment of chromosomal DNA to the membrane. Our results suggest a simple model in which the formation of large membrane‐associated nucleoprotein complexes physically occludes assembly of the division machinery.     

HIM-8 binds to the X chromosome pairing center and mediates chromosome-specific meiotic synapsis

The him-8 gene is essential for proper meiotic segregation of the X chromosomes in C. elegans. Here we show that loss of him-8 function causes profound X chromosome-specific defects in homolog pairing and synapsis. him-8 encodes a C2H2 zinc-finger protein that is expressed during meiosis and concentrates at a site on the X chromosome known as the meiotic pairing center (PC). A role for HIM-8 in PC function is supported by genetic interactions between PC lesions and him-8 mutations. HIM-8 bound chromosome sites associate with the nuclear envelope (NE) throughout meiotic prophase. Surprisingly, a point mutation in him-8 that retains both chromosome binding and NE localization fails to stabilize pairing or promote synapsis. These observations indicate that stabilization of homolog pairing is an active process in which the tethering of chromosome sites to the NE may be necessary but is not sufficient.     

Meiotic chromosome distribution in Drosophila oocytes: Roles of two kinesin-related proteins

Summary The recent finding that two proteins required for proper chromosome distribution in Drosophila oocytes are related to the microtubule motor protein, kinesin, provides new insights into the forces involved in meiotic chromosome movement. ncd is a spindle motor in meiosis but may perform a different role in the early mitotic divisions of the embryo. nod, until recently, has been thought to be a component of the distributive process of chromosome segregation. The finding that nod is a kinesin protein provides an alternative explanation of the effect of mutants on nonexchange chromosomes and suggests that nonexchange chromosomes segregate with exchange chromosomes in a single process, rather than via a two-step distributive system.     

A novel component of the division‐site selection system of Bacillus subtilis and a new mode of action for the division inhibitor MinCD

Cell division in bacteria is governed by a complex cytokinetic machinery in which the key player is a tubulin homologue, FtsZ. Most rod‐shaped bacteria divide precisely at mid‐cell between segregated sister chromosomes. Selection of the correct site for cell division is thought to be determined by two negative regulatory systems: the nucleoid occlusion system, which prevents division in the vicinity of the chromosomes, and the Min system, which prevents inappropriate division at the cell poles. In Bacillus subtilis recruitment of the division inhibitor MinCD to cell poles depends on DivIVA, and these proteins were thought to be sufficient for Min function. We have now identified a novel component of the division‐site selection system, MinJ, which bridges DivIVA and MinD. minJ mutants are impaired in division because MinCD activity is no longer restricted to cell poles. Although MinCD was thought to act specifically on FtsZ assembly, analysis of minJ and divIVA mutants showed that their block in division occurs downstream of FtsZ. The results support a model in which the main function of the Min system lies in allowing only a single round of division per cell cycle, and that MinCD acts at multiple levels to prevent inappropriate division.     

Bacterial filaments recover by successive and accelerated asymmetric divisions that allow rapid post-stress cell proliferation

Filamentation is a reversible morphological change triggered in response to various stresses that bacteria might encounter in the environment, during host infection or antibiotic treatments. Here we re-visit the dynamics of filament formation and recovery using a consistent framework based on live-cells microscopy. We compare the fate of filamentous Escherichia coli induced by cephalexin that inhibits cell division or by UV-induced DNA-damage that additionally perturbs chromosome segregation. We show that both filament types recover by successive and accelerated rounds of divisions that preferentially occur at the filaments' tip, thus resulting in the rapid production of multiple daughter cells with tightly regulated size. The DNA content, viability and further division of the daughter cells essentially depends on the coordination between chromosome segregation and division within the mother filament. Septum positioning at the filaments' tip depends on the Min system, while the nucleoid occlusion protein SlmA regulates the timing of division to prevent septum closure on unsegregated chromosomes. Our results not only recapitulate earlier conclusions but provide a higher level of detail regarding filaments division and the fate of the daughter cells. Together with previous reports, this work uncovers how filamentation recovery allows for a rapid cell proliferation after stress treatment.