How two become one: HJURP dimerization drives CENP‐A assembly

EMBO J 32 15, 2113–2124 doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.142; published online June142013Curr Biol 23 9, 764–769 doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.03.037; published online May062013Curr Biol 23 9, 770–774 doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.03.042; published online May062013CENP-A containing nucleosomes epigenetically specify centromere position on chromosomes. Deposition of CENP-A into chromatin is mediated by HJURP, a specific CENP-A chaperone. Paradoxically, HJURP binding sterically prevents dimerization of CENP-A, which is critical to form functional centromeric nucleosomes. A recent publication in The EMBO Journal (Zasadzińska et al, 2013) demonstrates that HJURP itself dimerizes through a C-terminal repeat region, which is essential for centromeric assembly of nascent CENP-A.CENP-A containing nucleosomes have a well-established role in the epigenetic specification of centromere position. However, the composition of the CENP-A nucleosome has been the subject of intense investigation and debate (as has been extensively reviewed, e.g., in Black and Cleveland, 2011). X-ray crystallography data, biochemical interaction experiments and in vivo mutational analysis provide strong evidence that CENP-A nucleosomes are octameric (CENP-A/H4/H2A/H2B)₂, analogous to their histone H3-containing counterparts (Tachiwana et al, 2011; Bassett et al, 2012). Alternatively, based primarily on AFM data and nucleosome crosslinking assays, a tetrameric CENP-A/H4/H2A/H2B ‘hemisome'' has been proposed to be present at centromeres, at least during part of the cell cycle (Dalal et al, 2007; Bui et al, 2012). Whether both nucleosome types exist under specific conditions remains an unresolved question. However, recent studies by the Maddox and Black labs have reported single-molecule fluorescence measurements of CENP-A nucleosomes and high-resolution DNA protection assays of centromeric chromatin, respectively, both of which indicate that octamers are the predominant species of CENP-A in vivo (Hasson et al, 2013; Padeganeh et al, 2013).HJURP is the centromeric histone chaperone that is responsible for timely assembly of CENP-A nucleosomes. HJURP binds to soluble CENP-A and is recruited to centromeric chromatin in early G1 phase, concurrently with nascent CENP-A (Stellfox et al, 2013). Importantly, HJURP facilitates CENP-A nucleosome formation in vitro and its transient targeting to non-centromeric chromatin is sufficient to stably deposit CENP-A at these sites in vivo (Barnhart et al, 2011). Together, these observations identify HJURP as a bona fide centromeric CENP-A histone assembly factor.However, there is an apparent discrepancy between the role of HJURP in CENP-A assembly and the octameric nature of CENP-A nucleosomes. The crystal structure of the human prenucleosomal complex clearly shows that HJURP binds to CENP-A/H4 dimers in a manner that precludes CENP-A/H4 hetero-tetramerization (Hu et al, 2011). Interestingly, however, mutational analysis of CENP-A has shown that tetramerization is crucial for centromere assembly (Bassett et al, 2012). Thus, a mechanism must exist to allow for two trimeric HJURP/CENP-A/H4 complexes to coordinately assemble a tetrameric (CENP-A/H4)₂ particle.In this issue, a study by the Foltz lab sheds light on these paradoxical observations (Zasadzińska et al, 2013). Human HJURP contains two C-terminal repeat regions (HJURP C-terminal domains; HCTD). Expression of short fragments of HJURP containing either of these was sufficient to allow for centromere targeting. However, depletion of endogenous HJURP abolished centromere targeting of the C-terminally located HCTD2 fragment, without affecting the localization of the fragment containing HCTD1. These observations suggest that HCTD1 is required for centromere targeting, while HCTD2 allows for HJURP dimerization. Indeed, the authors go on to show that the latter fragment is both necessary and sufficient to form functional dimers of HJURP. RNAi replacement experiments show that HJURP lacking the HCTD2 dimerization domain is incapable of loading nascent CENP-A into centromeres. Importantly, Zasadzińska et al (2013) demonstrate that the defect in CENP-A loading can be directly attributed to a lack of HJURP dimerization. In an elegant experiment where the HCTD2 containing domain is replaced by an unrelated dimerization domain (that of bacterial LacI), CENP-A assembly is rescued to wild-type levels (Figure 1). This indicates that dimerization of HJURP is an essential step in centromeric chromatin assembly and provides a potential mechanism for the assembly of tetrameric (CENP-A/H4)₂ structures into chromatin as precursors to octameric nucleosomes.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Human HJURP contains separate protein domains that are responsible for CENP-A/H4 binding (blue), centromere targeting (brown) and dimerization (red). Full-length HJURP containing all these domains is capable of assembling CENP-A nucleosomes at centromeres (left). Zasadzińska et al (2013) now show that HJURP lacking the dimerization domain is still able to localize to centromeres, but is unable to assemble CENP-A nucleosomes (middle). However, replacement of the HJURP dimerization domain by an exogenous dimerization domain fully rescues the capability to form CENP-A nucleosomes at centromeres (right). These findings show that HJURP dimerization is an essential feature in the process of nucleosome formation, and explain how (CENP-A/H4)₂ tetramers can be formed by a chaperone that exclusively binds to CENP-A/H4 dimers.While the composition of the HJURP complex suggests a likely mechanism for the formation of octameric nucleosomes, this poses a new challenge to the field. Future studies will be needed to dissect how the shielded HJURP-bound state of CENP-A/H4 can transition to a tetramer on DNA. Interestingly, HJURP is not the only histone chaperone that exclusively binds to histone dimers. Crystal structures of trimeric complexes of both Asf1a/H3.1/H4 (English et al, 2006) as well as DAXX/H3.3/H4 (Elsässer et al, 2012) clearly show sterical incompatibility between chaperone binding and histone tetramerization. It follows that efficient chromatin assembly requires a mode for two histone chaperones to deposit histone dimers in a coordinated fashion, e.g., through dimerization as has been shown for Nap1 (McBryant and Peersen, 2004) and now for HJURP. However, dimerization does not appear to be a universal feature for histone chaperones, as a single CAF1 chaperone is able to bind two H3/H4 dimers as well as (H3/H4)₂ tetramers (Winkler et al, 2012). Thus, while deposition of H3.1/H4 at the replication fork may be driven by the high density of pre-assembly complexes, assembly of nucleosomes containing the replacement variant H3.3, H3.1 nucleosomes at DNA damage sites, and CENP-A at the centromere would require a more active form of coordination. Histone chaperone dimerization may therefore be a common feature in the pipeline to chromatin formation.In summary, Zasadzińska et al (2013) propose a solution to a paradox in the assembly pathway of CENP-A. They show that while each HJURP molecule can exclusively bind a single CENP-A/H4 dimer, HJURP itself dimerizes, ultimately allowing for the formation of tetrameric (CENP-A/H4)₂ structures in chromatin. Interestingly, exclusive dimer binding has been observed for a number of histone chaperones, suggesting that chaperone dimerization may be a more general process in the nucleosome assembly pathway.     

An in Trans Interaction at the Interface of the Helicase and Primase Domains of the Hexameric Gene 4 Protein of Bacteriophage T7 Modulates Their Activities

DNA helicase and primase are essential for DNA replication. The helicase unwinds the DNA to provide single-stranded templates for DNA polymerase. The primase catalyzes the synthesis of oligoribonucleotides for the initiation of lagging strand synthesis. The two activities reside in a single polypeptide encoded by gene 4 of bacteriophage T7. Their coexistence within the same polypeptide facilitates their coordination during DNA replication. One surface of helix E within the helicase domain is positioned to interact with the primase domain and the linker connecting the two domains within the functional hexamer. The interaction occurs in trans such that helix E interacts with the primase domain and the linker of the adjacent subunit. Most alterations of residues on the surface of helix E (Arg⁴⁰⁴, Lys⁴⁰⁸, Tyr⁴¹¹, and Gly⁴¹⁵) eliminate the ability of the altered proteins to complement growth of T7 phage lacking gene 4. Both Tyr⁴¹¹ and Gly⁴¹⁵ are important in oligomerization of the protein. Alterations G415V and K408A simultaneously influence helicase and primase activities in opposite manners that mimic events observed during coordinated DNA synthesis. The results suggest that Asp²⁶³ located in the linker of one subunit can interact with Tyr⁴¹¹, Lys⁴⁰⁸, or Arg⁴⁰⁴ in helix E of the adjacent subunit depending on the oligomerization state. Thus the switch in contacts between Asp²⁶³ and its three interacting residues in helix E of the adjacent subunit results in conformational changes that modulate helicase and primase activity.At the replication fork DNA helicase unwinds the duplex DNA to expose single-stranded DNA for use as templates for the leading and lagging strand DNA polymerases (1). The 5′ to 3′ polymerization of nucleotides by the leading strand DNA polymerase proceeds in a continuous manner, whereas synthesis on the lagging strand occurs in a discontinuous manner, generating Okazaki fragments. The synthesis of each Okazaki fragment is initiated by the extension of an oligoribonucleotide that serves as a primer for the lagging strand DNA polymerase. These oligoribonucleotides are synthesized in a template-directed manner by DNA primase. For the two polymerases to communicate with each other, the lagging strand folds back on itself such that the lagging strand DNA polymerase becomes part of the replisome. This association of the two polymerases enables both strands to be synthesized in the same overall direction, and synthesis of both strands proceeds at identical rates. The folding of the lagging strand creates a replication loop of lagging strand DNA that contains the nascent Okazaki fragment and the ssDNA³ extruded behind the helicase. Single-stranded DNA-binding protein binds to the exposed single-stranded DNA to remove secondary structure, but it also interacts with the other proteins of the replisome to assist in the coordination of DNA synthesis (2).Among the several protein interactions within the replisome, the interaction of the helicase with the primase is one of the most critical (2–6). The association of the primase with the helicase places it in position to catalyze primer synthesis on the single-stranded DNA extruded by the moving helicase. In addition, the higher affinity of the helicase for single-stranded DNA serves to stabilize the primase on the lagging strand. Perhaps the most important is the ability of the primase to communicate with the helicase. During the rate-limiting step of primer synthesis, leading strand synthesis would be expected to outpace lagging strand synthesis. The association of primase with helicase provides a mechanism by which helicase movement can be coordinated with primer synthesis (7).The gene 4 protein of bacteriophage T7 is unique in that it contains both helicase and primase activities within the same polypeptide chain (see Fig. 1A). Although separate genes encode other replicative helicases and primases, they nonetheless require a physical association to function properly (2, 5). The helicase activity resides in the C-terminal 295 residues, and the primase activity resides in the N-terminal 245 residues (8). A linker of 26 residues separates the helicase and primase domains. The linker plays a critical role in the oligomerization of gene 4 protein (9). The primase and the helicase domains have been purified separately and shown to exhibit their activities independently (9–11). However, the presence of each domain has striking effects on the activity of the other (2).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Elements involved in the interaction between helicase and primase in E. coli and bacteriophage T7. A, schematic presentation of helicase and primase together with the structural elements involved in their interaction. In E. coli the helicase and primase interact via contacts of the C-terminal p16 of the primase with the N-terminal p17 of the helicase. In bacteriophage T7 the two activities are found in a single polypeptide where the primase and helicase domains are covalently connected via a flexible linker. Helix E is located in the helicase domain. B, top view of the hexameric T7 helicase (right panel) (Protein Data Bank accession code 1E0J). C, side view of the heptameric gene 4 protein containing both the helicase and primase domains (right panel) (Protein Data Bank accession code 1Q57). In B and C, two adjacent subunits are shown in green and yellow, respectively. The linker region and residues Ala²²⁵–Gly²²⁶ in the primase domain of the green subunit are shown in blue and magenta, respectively. Helix E in the helicase domain of the adjacent yellow subunit is shown in red. Residues potentially involved in the in trans interaction at the interface are indicated (left panels). In the heptameric structure (C), Gly⁴¹⁵ in Helix E is potentially interacting with Ala²²⁵ and/or Gly²²⁶ from the primase domain of the adjacent subunit. Lys⁴⁰⁸ is close to Asp²⁶³ in the linker from the adjacent subunit. In the hexameric structure (B), because the primase domain and a portion of the linker region are missing in this structure, the counterpart of Gly⁴¹⁵ is not present. Another obvious difference in this structure compared with that shown in C is that Asp²⁶³ in the linker of the heptamer is oriented toward Lys⁴⁰⁸, whereas it is close to Tyr⁴¹¹ in the hexamer structure. Distances shown in B and C are in similar ranges regardless of locations of interfaces in both hexameric and heptameric gene 4 protein structures. Structures from the Protein Data Bank were analyzed using PyMOL (DeLano Scientific LLC).Like other members of the Family 4 helicases, the helicase domain of gene 4 protein functions as a hexamer (see Fig. 1B). Members of this family assemble on single-stranded DNA with the DNA passing through the central channel formed by the oligomerization (4, 12). The nucleotide-binding site of the helicase is located at the subunit interface located between two RecA-like subdomains that bind dTTP, the preferred nucleotide for T7 helicase (13–17). The location of the nucleotide-binding site at the subunit interface provides multiple interactions of residues with the bound dTTP (18). These interactions assist in oligomerization, in binding to DNA, and in coupling the hydrolysis of dTTP to mechanical movement of the helicase (19–23).The primase domain, residing in the N-terminal half of the gene 4 protein, is a member of the DnaG family of prokaryotic primases. Three structural features distinguish members of this family. An N-terminal zinc-binding domain plays a critical role in recognizing sites for primer synthesis in ssDNA. An RNA polymerase domain, linked to the zinc-binding domain by a flexible linker, contains the catalytic site where metal-dependent polymerization of nucleotides occurs. A C-terminal segment covalently attaches the primase to the helicase. In other primases of this family, this segment interacts with the cognate helicase. T7 primase, like the primases of phage T4 and Escherichia coli, recognizes a trinucleotide sequence (5). T7 primase recognizes the sequence 5′-GTC-3′, at which it catalyzes the template directed synthesis of a dinucleotide (pppAC); the 3′-cytosine is essential for recognition, although this “cryptic” nucleotide is not copied into the product (24). The dinucleotide is then extended by the primase, provided the proper nucleotides, T and G, are present in the template. Consequently, the predominant T7 primase recognition sites are 5′-GGGTC-3′, 5′-TGGTC-3′, and 5′-GTGTC-3′ (25, 26). Thus T7 primase catalyzes the synthesis of the tetraribonucleotides pppACCC, pppACCA, and pppACAC. The lagging strand DNA polymerase then extends these functional tetranucleotides.The covalent linkage of primase and helicase in the gene 4 protein of bacteriophage T7 distinguishes it from most other replication systems where the association of the two proteins is dependent on a physical interaction of the two separate proteins. In bacteria such as E. coli, Bacillus stearothermophilus, and Staphylococcus aureus, this interaction is mediated through two structurally similar regions: the helicase-binding domain (p16 domain) located at the C terminus of the DnaG primase and the p17 domain of the DnaB helicase located at the N terminus of the protein (see Fig. 1A) (27–31). The association of DnaB with DnaG alters sequence recognition by DnaG and affects the length of primers synthesized (28, 31–33). Furthermore, cooperative binding of two or three DnaG monomers to the hexameric DnaB can halt translocation of DnaB on DNA (34). Such “association and dissociation” between the helicase and primase mediated by the p16 and p17 domains are believed to coordinate DNA synthesis by regulating the initiation of Okazaki fragment synthesis (6, 35, 36). Mutations in the p16 domain of DnaG can either affect the ability of the two proteins to form a complex, enhance the primase activity, or modulate the ATPase and/or helicase activities allosterically (31).The covalent association of primase and helicase in the bacteriophage T7 system clearly provides several of the advantages derived from the physical association of the two proteins in other systems. The primase is positioned correctly for primer synthesis, and DNA binding is achieved via the helicase. Furthermore, communication between the two domains of the gene 4 protein is dramatically revealed by the cessation of helicase movement during primer synthesis (7). However, the covalent association of the two activities precludes regulation by dissociation as in the other replication systems. The frequency of primase recognition sites in the phage genome is considerably more than that required for the initiation of Okazaki fragments. Consequently, primase activity in the T7 replication system must be highly regulated to ensure the translocation of helicase and the almost constant length of Okazaki fragments (2).T7 gene 4 protein is present in solution as a mixture of hexamers and heptamers (37), and the crystal structures of both oligomeric forms have been determined (see Fig. 1, B and C) (15, 38). In the heptameric structure an interaction of the helicase and primase domains occurs through helix E (see Fig. 1C). Located at the front of the helicase domain facing toward the primase domain, helix E is not only in proximity to the primase of the adjacent subunit but also in contact with the linker region connecting the two domains of the adjacent subunit. By this trans-packing interaction, the primase domain from one subunit is loosely stacked on the top of the helicase from the adjacent subunit (38) (see Fig. 1C). In the six-membered ring structure (15), the functional form of gene 4 protein, the primase domain is missing. However, the contact between helix E and the linker region from the adjacent subunit is present (see Fig. 1B). Some residues in the linker region have been identified previously as key factors involved in the conformational switch of helicase (39).How does the primase domain of gene 4 protein communicate with the helicase domain? Although the two domains cannot dissociate into solution, a transient dissociation of the two domains is possible as a result of the flexible linker through which they are connected. Alternatively, primase activity or helicase activity may be conveyed to the other domain as a result of conformational changes in the protein at the interface between the two domains. In either instance the linker region and the interface between the two domains are certain to be critical for this communication. Helix E, although quite distant from the catalytic sites of either the helicase or primase, contacts both the primase domain and the linker. In the present study we have examined the role of helix E in the function of gene 4 by genetically altering several residues and examining the function of the altered proteins in vivo and in vitro.     

Two Fundamentally Distinct PCNA Interaction Peptides Contribute to Chromatin Assembly Factor 1 Function

Chromatin assembly factor 1 (CAF-1) deposits histones H3 and H4 rapidly behind replication forks through an interaction with the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a DNA polymerase processivity factor that also binds to a number of replication enzymes and other proteins that act on nascent DNA. The mechanisms that enable CAF-1 and other PCNA-binding proteins to function harmoniously at the replication fork are poorly understood. Here we report that the large subunit of human CAF-1 (p150) contains two distinct PCNA interaction peptides (PIPs). The N-terminal PIP binds strongly to PCNA in vitro but, surprisingly, is dispensable for nucleosome assembly and only makes a modest contribution to targeting p150 to DNA replication foci in vivo. In contrast, the internal PIP (PIP2) lacks one of the highly conserved residues of canonical PIPs and binds weakly to PCNA. Surprisingly, PIP2 is essential for nucleosome assembly during DNA replication in vitro and plays a major role in targeting p150 to sites of DNA replication. Unlike canonical PIPs, such as that of p21, the two p150 PIPs are capable of preferentially inhibiting nucleosome assembly, rather than DNA synthesis, suggesting that intrinsic features of these peptides are part of the mechanism that enables CAF-1 to function behind replication forks without interfering with other PCNA-mediated processes.Eukaryotic cells in S phase not only have to replicate their entire genome but also faithfully reproduce preexisting chromatin structures onto the two nascent chromatids. The duplication of chromatin structures during DNA replication is a challenging task for eukaryotic cells. Newly synthesized histones are deposited very rapidly behind replication forks (150 to 300 bp), almost as soon as enough DNA has emerged from the replisome to allow the formation of nucleosome core particles (52). A key protein involved in coupling nucleosome assembly to DNA replication is chromatin assembly factor 1 (CAF-1). CAF-1 is a complex of three polypeptide subunits, known as p150, p60, and RbAp48 in vertebrates, that mediates the first step in nucleosome formation by depositing newly synthesized histone H3/H4 onto DNA (25, 50).In mouse and human cells, CAF-1 localizes to virtually all DNA replication foci throughout the S phase (28, 38, 49, 54). This strongly argues that CAF-1 is a physiologically relevant histone H3/H4 nucleosome assembly factor. In addition, disruption of CAF-1 function in human cells results in a severe loss of viability that is accompanied by spontaneous DNA damage and a block in S-phase progression (20, 40, 60). Thus, unlike in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the function of CAF-1 in vertebrates cannot be replaced by that of other nucleosome factors, such as members of the Hir protein family or Rtt106 (24, 27, 29). This may be because, unlike CAF-1, HIRA (a human homologue of yeast Hir1 and Hir2) does not associate with core histones that are synthesized during S phase (55). In human cells, the ability to promote nucleosome assembly preferentially onto replicating DNA is thus far unique to CAF-1.This distinctive property of CAF-1 is mediated through proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a homotrimeric ring that encircles double-stranded DNA (4) and acts as a sliding clamp to tether DNA polymerases to their DNA substrate and thereby enhance their processivity. Several lines of biochemical and genetic evidence support the role of PCNA in CAF-1-mediated nucleosome assembly. First, CAF-1 colocalizes with PCNA in vivo and binds directly to PCNA in vitro (27, 35, 49, 61). Second, even in the presence of excess unreplicated DNA, CAF-1 can select fully replicated plasmid DNA molecules as preferential substrates for histone deposition, but only when those molecules are associated with PCNA (49). Third, PCNA-driven DNA synthesis can also attract CAF-1 to sites of DNA repair events, such as nucleotide excision repair (12, 15, 32, 35). Fourth, a specific PCNA mutation impairs the role of CAF-1 in telomeric silencing in S. cerevisiae (48, 61). Interestingly, a number of PCNA mutations that reduce its interaction with other PCNA-binding proteins have apparently no effect on CAF-1 function in vivo (48, 61). This implies that the interaction of CAF-1 with PCNA is substantially different from that of other PCNA-binding proteins.Enhancing DNA polymerase processivity is not the only function of PCNA in DNA replication. The sliding clamp also directly binds to other replication enzymes, such as DNA ligase 1, DNA polymerase δ, and FEN1 (14, 21, 37). In addition to its roles in DNA synthesis and nucleosome assembly, PCNA also directly binds to a number of enzymes that continuously monitor and correct the quality of nascent DNA. These include enzymes involved in epigenetic inheritance, such as the maintenance DNA methyltransferase DNMT1 (8), base excision repair (UNG2) (42), mismatch repair (MSH3 and MSH6) (9), DNA lesion bypass (23), and many other processes (31, 36). Even subtle defects in many of these processes, including CAF-1-dependent nucleosome assembly (39), lead to either chromosome rearrangements or mutator phenotypes, which are common features of many human cancers. Surprisingly, many of these enzymes interact with PCNA via canonical PCNA interaction peptides (PIPs) that conform to the consensus sequence QXXhXXaa, where Q is a glutamine, h is a hydrophobic residue (valine, methionine, leucine, or isoleucine), a is an aromatic residue (phenylalanine, tyrosine, tryptophan, or occasionally histidine), and X represents any amino acid. Therefore, regulatory mechanisms must exist to ensure that these fundamentally distinct PCNA-dependent processes occur in a carefully orchestrated manner without mutually interfering with each other.In order to understand how the action of CAF-1 is coordinated with that of other PCNA-binding proteins at replication forks, we carried out a thorough study of CAF-1 PIPs by analyzing their functions using a number of assays. We found that the p150 subunit of CAF-1 contains two fundamentally distinct PIPs. The N-terminal motif (PIP1) binds strongly to PCNA in vitro but is dispensable for nucleosome assembly during simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA replication. In contrast, despite the lack of a key conserved residue, the second PIP (PIP2) of CAF-1 is crucial for replication-dependent nucleosome assembly in vitro and for targeting CAF-1 to DNA replication foci in vivo. Remarkably, although PIP2 exhibits some features of canonical PIPs, it binds only weakly to PCNA in vitro. We suggest that regulated PCNA binding via this peptide may play an important role in ensuring that CAF-1 can efficiently deposit histones behind replication forks without competing with the numerous other enzymes that require continuous access to PCNA during DNA replication. Consistent with this, we show that CAF-1 PIPs possess the ability to preferentially interfere with nucleosome assembly rather than with DNA synthesis.     

Protein and DNA Effectors Control the TraI Conjugative Helicase of Plasmid R1

The mechanisms controlling progression of conjugative DNA processing from a preinitiation stage of specific plasmid strand cleavage at the transfer origin to a stage competent for unwinding the DNA strand destined for transfer remain obscure. Linear heteroduplex substrates containing double-stranded DNA binding sites for plasmid R1 relaxosome proteins and various regions of open duplex for TraI helicase loading were constructed to model putative intermediate structures in the initiation pathway. The activity of TraI was compared in steady-state multiple turnover experiments that measured the net production of unwound DNA as well as transesterase-catalyzed cleavage at nic. Helicase efficiency was enhanced by the relaxosome components TraM and integration host factor. The magnitude of stimulation depended on the proximity of the specific protein binding sites to the position of open DNA. The cytoplasmic domain of the R1 coupling protein, TraDΔN130, stimulated helicase efficiency on all substrates in a manner consistent with cooperative interaction and sequence-independent DNA binding. Variation in the position of duplex opening also revealed an unsuspected autoinhibition of the unwinding reaction catalyzed by full-length TraI. The activity reduction was sequence dependent and was not observed with a truncated helicase, TraIΔN308, lacking the site-specific DNA binding transesterase domain. Given that transesterase and helicase domains are physically tethered in the wild-type protein, this observation suggests that an intramolecular switch controls helicase activation. The data support a model where protein-protein and DNA ligand interactions at the coupling protein interface coordinate the transition initiating production and uptake of the nucleoprotein secretion substrate.Controlled duplex DNA unwinding is a crucial prerequisite for the expression and maintenance of genomes. Genome-manipulating and -regulating proteins are central to that biological function in recognizing appropriate DNA targets at initiation sequences and unwinding the complementary strands to provide single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) templates for nucleic acid synthesis and other processing reactions. The protein machineries involved include nucleic acid helicases. DNA helicases are powerful enzymes that convert the energy of nucleoside triphosphate hydrolysis to directional DNA strand translocation and separation of the double helix into its constituent single strands (for reviews, see references 13, 14, 16, 38, 55, and 64). By necessity, these enzymes interact with DNA strands via mechanisms independent of sequence recognition. At replication initiation helicases gain controlled access to the double-stranded genome at positions determined by the DNA binding properties of initiator proteins that comprise an origin recognition complex (1, 9, 17, 31, 45, 66). The mechanisms supporting localized unwinding within the complex include initiator-induced DNA looping, wrapping, and bending and feature regions of low thermodynamic stability. The exposed ssDNA mediates helicase binding followed by directional translocation along that strand until the enzyme engages the duplex for unwinding.In the MOB_F family of conjugation systems, the plasmid DNA strand destined for transfer (T strand) is unwound from its complement by a dedicated conjugative helicase, TraI of F-like plasmids or TrwC of the IncW paradigm. These enzymes are remarkable in that the same polypeptides additionally harbor in a distinct domain a DNA transesterase activity. That function is required to recognize and cleave the precise phosphodiester bond, nic, in the T strand where unwinding of the secretion substrate begins. In current models the conjugative helicases are thus targeted to the transfer origin (oriT) of their cognate plasmid by the high-affinity DNA sequence interactions of their N-terminal DNA transesterase domains. In the bacterial cell, recruitment and activation of the conjugative helicase occur not on naked DNA but within an initiator complex called the relaxosome (67). For the F-like plasmid R1, sequence-specific DNA binding properties of the plasmid proteins TraI, TraY, TraM, and the host integration factor (IHF) direct assembly of the relaxosome at oriT (10, 12, 29, 33, 51, 52). Integration of protein TraM confers recognition features to the relaxosome, which permit its selective docking to TraD, the coupling protein associated with the conjugative type IV secretion system (T4CP) (2, 15, 49). In current models, the T4CP forms a hexameric translocation pore at the cytoplasmic membrane that not only governs substrate entry to the envelope spanning type IV secretion machinery but also provides energy for macromolecular transport via ATP hydrolysis (36, 50). These models propose that T4CPs provide not only a physical bridge between the plasmid and the type IV transporter but also a unique control function in distinguishing one plasmid (relaxosome) from another (7, 8). Before the current study (see accompanying report [41]), evidence indicating that regulation of the initiation of conjugative DNA processing also takes place at this interface had not been reported.F plasmid TraI protein, originally named Escherichia coli DNA helicase I, was initially characterized in the Hoffman-Berling laboratory (19). The purified enzyme exhibits properties in vitro consistent with its function in conjugative DNA strand transfer including a very high 1,100-bp/s rate of duplex unwinding, high processivity, and a 5′-to-3′ directional bias (relative to the strand to which it is bound) (34, 54). Together these features should readily support the observed rate of conjugative DNA translocation as well as concomitant replacement synthesis of the mobilized T strand from the 3′ OH product of nic cleavage.Comparatively little is known about the mechanisms of initiating TraI helicase activity. The enzyme requires ssDNA 5′ to the duplex junction (32), and a minimum length of 30 nucleotides (nt) is necessary to promote efficient duplex unwinding on substrates lacking oriT (11, 54). To our knowledge, oriT is the only sequence where the helicase activity is naturally initiated, however. Moreover, the unique fusion of a helicase to the site- and strand-specific DNA transesterase domains within MOB_F enzymes is expected to pose intriguing regulatory challenges during initiation. The combination within a single polypeptide of a site-specific DNA binding capacity with a helical motor activity would seem counterproductive. The extraordinary efficiency of these proteins in intercellular DNA strand transfer belies this prediction and instead hints strongly at a coordinated progression of the initiation pathway. Since relaxosome assembly is thus far insufficient to initiate helicase activity on supercoiled oriT substrates in vitro, we have developed a series of heteroduplex DNA substrates which support the unwinding reaction and model possible intermediate structures of R1 plasmid strand transfer initiation (10). In this system linear double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) substrates with a central region of sequence heterogeneity trap defined lengths of R1 oriT sequence in unwound conformation. Unexpectedly, efficient helicase activity initiated from a melted oriT duplex required ssDNA twice as long (60 nt) as that previously observed on substrates lacking this sequence (11).In the current report, we describe an application of these models where variation in the position of duplex opening in the vicinity of nic, as well as the additional presence of auxiliary relaxosome proteins, has revealed novel insights into control of a conjugative helicase involving both DNA and protein interactions. Moreover, we observe a sequence-independent stimulation of the unwinding reaction in the presence of T4CP TraD. These results support a model where docking of the preinitiation relaxosome assembly to the T4CP alters the composition and architecture of the complex in a manner essential to the subsequent initiation of T-strand unwinding.     

Dual Nuclease and Helicase Activities of Helicobacter pylori AddAB Are Required for DNA Repair, Recombination, and Mouse Infectivity

Helicobacter pylori infection of the human stomach is associated with disease-causing inflammation that elicits DNA damage in both bacterial and host cells. Bacteria must repair their DNA to persist. The H. pylori AddAB helicase-exonuclease is required for DNA repair and efficient stomach colonization. To dissect the role of each activity in DNA repair and infectivity, we altered the AddA and AddB nuclease (NUC) domains and the AddA helicase (HEL) domain by site-directed mutagenesis. Extracts of Escherichia coli expressing H. pylori addA^NUCB or addAB^NUC mutants unwound DNA but had approximately half of the exonuclease activity of wild-type AddAB; the addA^NUCB^NUC double mutant lacked detectable nuclease activity but retained helicase activity. Extracts with AddA^HELB lacked detectable helicase and nuclease activity. H. pylori with the single nuclease domain mutations were somewhat less sensitive to the DNA-damaging agent ciprofloxacin than the corresponding deletion mutant, suggesting that residual nuclease activity promotes limited DNA repair. The addA^NUC and addA^HEL mutants colonized the stomach less efficiently than the wild type; addB^NUC showed partial attenuation. E. coli ΔrecBCD expressing H. pylori addAB was recombination-deficient unless H. pylori recA was also expressed, suggesting a species-specific interaction between AddAB and RecA and also that H. pylori AddAB participates in both DNA repair and recombination. These results support a role for both the AddAB nuclease and helicase in DNA repair and promoting infectivity.Infection of the stomach with Helicobacter pylori causes a variety of diseases including gastritis, peptic ulcers, and gastric cancer (1). A central feature of the pathology of these conditions is the establishment of a chronic inflammatory response that acts both on the host and the infecting bacteria (2). Both epithelial (3, 4) and lymphoid (5, 6) cells in the gastric mucosa of infected individuals release DNA-damaging agents that can introduce double-stranded (ds)² breaks into the bacterial chromosome (7). The ds breaks must be repaired for the bacteria to survive and establish chronic colonization of the stomach. Homologous recombination is required for the faithful repair of DNA damage and bacterial survival. Alteration of the expression of one of a series of cell surface proteins on H. pylori occurs by an apparent gene conversion of babA, the frequency of which is reduced in repair-deficient strains (8, 9). This change in the cell surface, which may allow H. pylori to evade the host immune response, is a second means by which recombination can promote efficient colonization of the stomach by H. pylori.The initiation or presynaptic steps of recombination at dsDNA breaks in most bacteria involves the coordinated action of nuclease and helicase activities provided by one of two multisubunit enzymes, the AddAB and RecBCD enzymes (10). Escherichia coli recBCD null mutants have reduced cell viability, are hypersensitive to DNA-damaging agents, and are homologous recombination-deficient (11–14). Similarly, H. pylori addA and addB null mutants are hypersensitive to DNA-damaging agents, have reduced frequencies of babA gene conversion, and colonize the stomach of mice less efficiently than wild-type strains (8).The activities of RecBCD enzyme from E. coli (15–19) and AddAB from H. pylori (8) or Bacillus subtilis (20–23) indicate some common general features of the presynaptic steps of DNA repair. In the case of E. coli, repair begins when the RecBCD enzyme binds to a dsDNA end and unwinds the DNA using its ATP-dependent helicase activities (17, 24). Single-stranded (ss) DNA produced during unwinding, with or without accompanying nuclease, is coated with RecA protein (16, 25). This recombinogenic substrate engages in strand exchange with a homologous intact duplex to form a joint molecule. Joint molecules are thought to be converted into intact, recombinant DNA either by replication or by cutting and ligation of exchanged strands (26).Although the AddAB and RecBCD enzymes appear to play similar roles in promoting recombination and DNA repair, they differ in several ways. RecBCD is a heterotrimer, composed of one copy of the RecB, RecC, and RecD gene products (27), whereas AddAB has two subunits, encoded by the addA and addB genes (21, 28). The enzyme subunit(s) responsible for helicase activity can be inferred from the presence of conserved protein domains or the activity of purified proteins. AddA, RecB, and RecD are superfamily I helicases with six highly conserved helicase motifs, including the conserved Walker A box found in many enzymes that bind ATP (29–32). A Walker A box is defined by the consensus sequence (G/A)XXGXGKT (X is any amino acid (29). RecBCD enzymes in which the conserved Lys in this motif is changed to Gln have a reduced affinity for ATP binding (33, 34) and altered helicase activity (17, 35–37).A nuclease domain with the conserved amino acid sequence LDYK is found in RecB, AddA, AddB, and many other nucleases (38). The conserved Asp plays a role in Mg²⁺ binding at the active site; Mg²⁺ is required for nuclease activity (39). The recB1080 mutation, which changes codon 1080 from the conserved Asp in this motif to Ala, eliminates nuclease activity (39).We have recently shown that addA and addB deletion mutants are hypersensitive to DNA-damaging agents and impaired in colonization of the mouse stomach compared with wild-type strains (8). To determine the roles of the individual helicase and nuclease activities of H. pylori AddAB in DNA repair and infectivity, we used site-directed mutagenesis to inactivate the conserved nuclease domains of addA and addB and the conserved ATPase (helicase) domain of AddA. Here, we report that loss of the AddAB helicase is sufficient to impair H. pylori DNA repair and infectivity and, when the genes are expressed in E. coli, homologous recombination. AddAB retains partial activity in biochemical and genetic assays when either of the two nuclease domains is inactivated but loses all detectable nuclease activity when both domains are inactivated. Remarkably, H. pylori AddAB can produce recombinants in E. coli only in the presence of H. pylori RecA, suggesting a species-specific interaction in which AddAB facilitates the production of ssDNA-coated with RecA protein. Our results show that both the helicase and nuclease activities are required for the biological roles of H. pylori AddAB.