Dimerization of the CENP‐A assembly factor HJURP is required for centromeric nucleosome deposition

The epigenetic mark of the centromere is thought to be a unique centromeric nucleosome that contains the histone H3 variant, centromere protein‐A (CENP‐A). The deposition of new centromeric nucleosomes requires the CENP‐A‐specific chromatin assembly factor HJURP (Holliday junction recognition protein). Crystallographic and biochemical data demonstrate that the Scm3‐like domain of HJURP binds a single CENP‐A–histone H4 heterodimer. However, several lines of evidence suggest that HJURP forms an octameric CENP‐A nucleosome. How an octameric CENP‐A nucleosome forms from individual CENP‐A/histone H4 heterodimers is unknown. Here, we show that HJURP forms a homodimer through its C‐terminal domain that includes the second HJURP_C domain. HJURP exists as a dimer in the soluble preassembly complex and at chromatin when new CENP‐A is deposited. Dimerization of HJURP is essential for the deposition of new CENP‐A nucleosomes. The recruitment of HJURP to centromeres occurs independent of dimerization and CENP‐A binding. These data provide a mechanism whereby the CENP‐A pre‐nucleosomal complex achieves assembly of the octameric CENP‐A nucleosome through the dimerization of the CENP‐A chaperone HJURP.     

Live‐cell imaging reveals sustained centromere binding of CENP‐T via CENP‐A and CENP‐B

At the centromere, a network of proteins, the kinetochore, assembles in order to grant correct chromatin segregation. In this study the dynamics and molecular interactions of the inner kinetochore protein CENP‐T were analyzed employing a variety of fluorescence microscopy techniques in living human cells. Acceptor‐bleaching FRET indicates that CENP‐T directly associates with CENP‐A and CENP‐B. CENP‐T exchange into centromeres is restricted to the S‐phase of the cell cycle as revealed by FRAP, suggesting a coreplicational loading mechanism, as we have recently also demonstrated for CENP‐I. These properties make CENP‐T one of the basic inner kinetochore proteins with most further proteins binding downstream, suggesting a fundamental role of CENP‐T in kinetochore function. (© 2008 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

CENP‐T provides a structural platform for outer kinetochore assembly

The kinetochore forms a dynamic interface with microtubules from the mitotic spindle during mitosis. The Ndc80 complex acts as the key microtubule‐binding complex at kinetochores. However, it is unclear how the Ndc80 complex associates with the inner kinetochore proteins that assemble upon centromeric chromatin. Here, based on a high‐resolution structural analysis, we demonstrate that the N‐terminal region of vertebrate CENP‐T interacts with the ‘RWD' domain in the Spc24/25 portion of the Ndc80 complex. Phosphorylation of CENP‐T strengthens a cryptic hydrophobic interaction between CENP‐T and Spc25 resulting in a phospho‐regulated interaction that occurs without direct recognition of the phosphorylated residue. The Ndc80 complex interacts with both CENP‐T and the Mis12 complex, but we find that these interactions are mutually exclusive, supporting a model in which two distinct pathways target the Ndc80 complex to kinetochores. Our results provide a model for how the multiple protein complexes at kinetochores associate in a phospho‐regulated manner.     

Molecular basis for Cdk1‐regulated timing of Mis18 complex assembly and CENP‐A deposition

The centromere, a chromosomal locus that acts as a microtubule attachment site, is epigenetically specified by the enrichment of CENP‐A nucleosomes. Centromere maintenance during the cell cycle requires HJURP‐mediated CENP‐A deposition, a process regulated by the Mis18 complex (Mis18α/Mis18β/Mis18BP1). Spatial and temporal regulation of Mis18 complex assembly is crucial for its centromere association and function. Here, we provide the molecular basis for the assembly and regulation of the Mis18 complex. We show that the N‐terminal region of Mis18BP1 spanning amino acid residues 20–130 directly interacts with Mis18α/β to form the Mis18 complex. Within Mis18α/β, the Mis18α MeDiY domain can directly interact with Mis18BP1. Mis18α/β forms a hetero‐hexamer with 4 Mis18α and 2 Mis18β. However, only two copies of Mis18BP1 interact with Mis18α/β to form a hetero‐octameric assembly, highlighting the role of Mis18 oligomerization in limiting the number of Mis18BP1 within the Mis18 complex. Furthermore, we demonstrate the involvement of consensus Cdk1 phosphorylation sites on Mis18 complex assembly and thus provide a rationale for cell cycle‐regulated timing of Mis18 assembly and CENP‐A deposition.     

Muscle differentiation: how two cells become one

A key feature of myogenesis is the fusion of myoblasts to form multinucleate myotubes. Recent work in Drosophila has uncovered a collection of genes that operate at different stages of this process. Some interactions between them have been described that begin to define links from outside the cell via the plasma membrane to the cytoskeleton. Future studies will establish the extent to which the molecular mechanisms of myoblast fusion are conserved between Drosophila and other animals, as found in other aspects of myogenesis.     

Trait‐based partner selection drives mycorrhizal network assembly

Plants and their microbial symbionts are often found to interact non‐randomly in nature, but we have yet to understand the mechanisms responsible for such preferential species associations. Theory predicts that host plants should select symbiotic partners bearing traits complementary to their own, as this should favor cooperation and evolutionary stability of mutualisms. Here, we present the first field‐based empirical test for this hypothesis using arbuscular mycorrhizas (AM), the oldest and most widespread plant symbiosis. Preferential associations occurring within a local plant–AM fungal community could not be predicted by the spatial distributions of interacting partners, nor by gradients in soil properties. Rather, plants with similar traits preferentially hosted similar AM fungi and, likewise, phylogenetically related AM fungi (assumed to have similar functional traits) interacted with similar plants. Our results suggest that trait‐based partner selection may have been a strong force in maintaining plant–AM fungal symbioses since the evolution of land plants.     

BH3‐in‐groove dimerization initiates and helix 9 dimerization expands Bax pore assembly in membranes

Pro‐apoptotic Bax induces mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) by forming oligomers through a largely undefined process. Using site‐specific disulfide crosslinking, compartment‐specific chemical labeling, and mutational analysis, we found that activated integral membrane Bax proteins form a BH3‐in‐groove dimer interface on the MOM surface similar to that observed in crystals. However, after the α5 helix was released into the MOM, the remaining interface with α2, α3, and α4 helices was rearranged. Another dimer interface was formed inside the MOM by two intersected or parallel α9 helices. Combinations of these interfaces generated oligomers in the MOM. Oligomerization was initiated by BH3‐in‐groove dimerization, without which neither the other dimerizations nor MOMP occurred. In contrast, α9 dimerization occurred downstream and was required for release of large but not small proteins from mitochondria. Moreover, the release of large proteins was facilitated by α9 insertion into the MOM and localization to the pore rim. Therefore, the BH3‐in‐groove dimerization on the MOM nucleates the assembly of an oligomeric Bax pore that is enlarged by α9 dimerization at the rim.     

Cryo‐EM structure of the CENP‐A nucleosome in complex with phosphorylated CENP‐C

The CENP‐A nucleosome is a key structure for kinetochore assembly. Once the CENP‐A nucleosome is established in the centromere, additional proteins recognize the CENP‐A nucleosome to form a kinetochore. CENP‐C and CENP‐N are CENP‐A binding proteins. We previously demonstrated that vertebrate CENP‐C binding to the CENP‐A nucleosome is regulated by CDK1‐mediated CENP‐C phosphorylation. However, it is still unknown how the phosphorylation of CENP‐C regulates its binding to CENP‐A. It is also not completely understood how and whether CENP‐C and CENP‐N act together on the CENP‐A nucleosome. Here, using cryo‐electron microscopy (cryo‐EM) in combination with biochemical approaches, we reveal a stable CENP‐A nucleosome‐binding mode of CENP‐C through unique regions. The chicken CENP‐C structure bound to the CENP‐A nucleosome is stabilized by an intramolecular link through the phosphorylated CENP‐C residue. The stable CENP‐A‐CENP‐C complex excludes CENP‐N from the CENP‐A nucleosome. These findings provide mechanistic insights into the dynamic kinetochore assembly regulated by CDK1‐mediated CENP‐C phosphorylation.     

How persons become things: economic and epistemological changes among Nayaka hunter‐gatherers

The ontologies and epistemologies of hunter‐gatherers have attracted growing attention in recent years as these people are undergoing changes. We examine these changes, focusing on one particular case based on our studies of the South Indian Nayaka; they have recently added cultivation and animal husbandry to their partially ongoing hunting and gathering life‐style. Resisting analysis based on an assumed forest/domesticated dichotomy, we show that forest and domesticated animals and plants are both regarded as sentient co‐dwellers in some cases, and as objects in others, depending not on what they are in essence, or where they are, but on when, by whom, and for what purpose they are approached. We argue that pockets of utilitarian framing emerge within the continuing relational epistemology of the Nayaka along with a growing departure from immediacy in the production‐consumption nexus. In these pockets, the vivid presence of animals and plants is concealed, and they no longer appear as persons but as things.     

When two become one: the limits of causality analysis of brain dynamics

Biological systems often consist of multiple interacting subsystems, the brain being a prominent example. To understand the functions of such systems it is important to analyze if and how the subsystems interact and to describe the effect of these interactions. In this work we investigate the extent to which the cause-and-effect framework is applicable to such interacting subsystems. We base our work on a standard notion of causal effects and define a new concept called natural causal effect. This new concept takes into account that when studying interactions in biological systems, one is often not interested in the effect of perturbations that alter the dynamics. The interest is instead in how the causal connections participate in the generation of the observed natural dynamics. We identify the constraints on the structure of the causal connections that determine the existence of natural causal effects. In particular, we show that the influence of the causal connections on the natural dynamics of the system often cannot be analyzed in terms of the causal effect of one subsystem on another. Only when the causing subsystem is autonomous with respect to the rest can this interpretation be made. We note that subsystems in the brain are often bidirectionally connected, which means that interactions rarely should be quantified in terms of cause-and-effect. We furthermore introduce a framework for how natural causal effects can be characterized when they exist. Our work also has important consequences for the interpretation of other approaches commonly applied to study causality in the brain. Specifically, we discuss how the notion of natural causal effects can be combined with Granger causality and Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM). Our results are generic and the concept of natural causal effects is relevant in all areas where the effects of interactions between subsystems are of interest.     

Structural insights into the intramolecular interactions of centromere protein CENP‐I

In mitosis, the accurate segregation of sister chromosomes relies on kinetochore, a multiple subunits complex assembled on centromere of each sister chromosome. As a core component of inner kinetochore, CENP‐I plays important functions to mediate kinetochore assembly and supports the faithful chromosome segregation. The structures of the N‐terminus and C‐terminus of CENP‐I homologs in complex with CENP‐H/K have been reported, respectively. Unfortunately, the intramolecular interactions of CENP‐I are poorly understood, and how CENP‐I interacts with CENP‐M remains unknown. Here, we verified a unique helix α11, which forms the intramolecular interactions with N‐terminal HEAT repeats in fungal CENP‐I. Deletion of the helix α11 exposed the hydrophobic surface and resulted in the in vitro protein aggregation of N‐terminal HEAT repeats of fungal CENP‐I. The corresponding helix and its intramolecular interaction are highly conserved in human CENP‐I. Deletion of the corresponding helix in human CENP‐I dramatically reduced the functional activity to interact with CENP‐H and CENP‐M. Mutations of the conserved residues on the helix in human CENP‐I significantly weakened the binding to CENP‐M, but not CENP‐H, in HeLa cells. Therefore, our findings for the first time unveiled a conserved helix of CENP‐I, which is important for the intramolecular interaction and function, and would be helpful for understanding the structure basis of how CENP‐I mediates the kinetochore assembly during cell cycle and mitosis.     

Mechanisms of kinesin‐7 CENP‐E in kinetochore–microtubule capture and chromosome alignment during cell division

Chromosome congression is essential for faithful chromosome segregation and genomic stability in cell division. Centromere‐associated protein E (CENP‐E), a plus‐end‐directed kinesin motor, is required for congression of pole‐proximal chromosomes in metaphase. CENP‐E accumulates at the outer plate of kinetochores and mediates the kinetochore‐microtubule capture. CENP‐E also transports the chromosomes along spindle microtubules towards the equatorial plate. CENP‐E interacts with Bub1‐related kinase, Aurora B and core kinetochore components during kinetochore–microtubule attachment. In this review, we introduce the structures and mechanochemistry of kinesin‐7 CENP‐E. We highlight the complicated interactions between CENP‐E and partner proteins during chromosome congression. We summarise the detailed roles and mechanisms of CENP‐E in mitosis and meiosis, including the kinetochore–microtubule capture, chromosome congression/alignment in metaphase and the regulation of spindle assembly checkpoint. We also shed a light on the roles of CENP‐E in tumourigenesis and CENP‐E's specific inhibitors.     

Protein evolution: when two become three

Bacterial signaling pathways provide wonderful systems for analyzing protein evolution in?vivo. A systematic dissection of the phosphate-sensing machinery in proteobacteria shows that adaptive, not neutral, mutations disable deleterious crosstalk with closely related signaling systems.     

Dissecting protein‐protein interactions in proteasome assembly: Implication to its self‐assembly

The 26S proteasome is a multi‐catalytic ATP‐dependent protease complex that recognizes and cleaves damaged or misfolded proteins to maintain cellular homeostasis. The 26S subunit consists of 20S core and 19S regulatory particles. 20S core particle consists of a stack of heptameric alpha and beta subunits. To elucidate the structure‐function relationship, we have dissected protein‐protein interfaces of 20S core particle and analyzed structural and physiochemical properties of intra‐alpha, intra‐beta, inter‐beta, and alpha‐beta interfaces. Furthermore, we have studied the evolutionary conservation of 20S core particle. We find the size of intra‐alpha interfaces is significantly larger and is more hydrophobic compared with other interfaces. Inter‐beta interfaces are well packed, more polar, and have higher salt‐bridge density than other interfaces. In proteasome assembly, residues in beta subunits are better conserved than alpha subunits, while multi‐interface residues are the most conserved. Among all the residues at the interfaces of both alpha and beta subunits, Gly is highly conserved. The largest size of intra‐alpha interfaces complies with the hypothesis that large interfaces form first during the 20S assembly. The tight packing of inter‐beta interfaces makes the core particle impenetrable from outer wall of the cylinder. Comparing the three domains, eukaryotes have large and well‐packed interfaces followed by archaea and bacteria. Our findings provide a structural basis of assembly of 20S core particle in all the three domains of life.     

Actin‐induced dimerization of palladin promotes actin‐bundling

A subset of actin binding proteins is able to form crosslinks between two or more actin filaments, thus producing structures of parallel or networked bundles. These actin crosslinking proteins interact with actin through either bivalent binding or dimerization. We recently identified two binding sites within the actin binding domain of palladin, an actin crosslinking protein that plays an important role in normal cell adhesion and motility during wound healing and embryonic development. In this study, we show that actin induces dimerization of palladin. Furthermore, the extent of dimerization reflects earlier comparisons of actin binding and bundling between different domains of palladin. On the basis of these results we hypothesized that actin binding may promote a conformational change that results in dimerization of palladin, which in turn may drive the crosslinking of actin filaments. The proximal distance between two actin binding sites on crosslinking proteins determines the ultrastructural properties of the filament network, therefore we also explored interdomain interactions using a combination of chemical crosslinking experiments and actin cosedimentation assays. Limited proteolysis data reveals that palladin is less susceptible to enzyme digestion after actin binding. Our results suggest that domain movements in palladin are necessary for interactions with actin and are induced by interactions with actin filaments. Accordingly, we put forth a model linking the structural changes to functional dynamics.     

Retromer oligomerization drives SNX‐BAR coat assembly and membrane constriction

Proteins exit from endosomes through tubular carriers coated by retromer, a complex that impacts cellular signaling, lysosomal biogenesis and numerous diseases. The coat must overcome membrane tension to form tubules. We explored the dynamics and driving force of this process by reconstituting coat formation with yeast retromer and the BAR‐domain sorting nexins Vps5 and Vps17 on oriented synthetic lipid tubules. This coat oligomerizes bidirectionally, forming a static tubular structure that does not exchange subunits. High concentrations of sorting nexins alone constrict membrane tubes to an invariant radius of 19 nm. At lower concentrations, oligomers of retromer must bind and interconnect the sorting nexins to drive constriction. Constricting less curved membranes into tubes, which requires more energy, coincides with an increased surface density of retromer on the sorting nexin layer. Retromer‐mediated crosslinking of sorting nexins at variable densities may thus tune the energy that the coat can generate to deform the membrane. In line with this, genetic ablation of retromer oligomerization impairs endosomal protein exit in yeast and human cells.