Re‐examining how Munc13‐1 facilitates opening of syntaxin‐1

Munc13‐1 is crucial for neurotransmitter release and, together with Munc18‐1, orchestrates assembly of the neuronal SNARE complex formed by syntaxin‐1, SNAP‐25, and synaptobrevin. Assembly starts with syntaxin‐1 folded into a self‐inhibited closed conformation that binds to Munc18‐1. Munc13‐1 is believed to catalyze the opening of syntaxin‐1 to facilitate SNARE complex formation. However, different types of Munc13‐1‐syntaxin‐1 interactions have been reported to underlie this activity, and the critical nature of Munc13‐1 for release may arise because of its key role in bridging the vesicle and plasma membranes. To shed light into the mechanism of action of Munc13‐1, we have used NMR spectroscopy, SNARE complex assembly experiments, and liposome fusion assays. We show that point mutations in a linker region of syntaxin‐1 that forms intrinsic part of the closed conformation strongly impair stimulation of SNARE complex assembly and liposome fusion mediated by Munc13‐1 fragments, even though binding of this linker region to Munc13‐1 is barely detectable. Conversely, the syntaxin‐1 SNARE motif clearly binds to Munc13‐1, but a mutation that disrupts this interaction does not affect SNARE complex assembly or liposome fusion. We also show that Munc13‐1 cannot be replaced by an artificial tethering factor to mediate liposome fusion. Overall, these results emphasize how very weak interactions can play fundamental roles in promoting conformational transitions and strongly support a model whereby the critical nature of Munc13‐1 for neurotransmitter release arises not only from its ability to bridge two membranes but also from an active role in opening syntaxin‐1 via interactions with the linker.     

Munc18-1 stabilizes syntaxin 1, but is not essential for syntaxin 1 targeting and SNARE complex formation

Munc18-1, a member of the Sec1/Munc18 (SM) protein family, is essential for synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Munc18-1 binds tightly to the SNARE protein syntaxin 1, but the physiological significance and functional role of this interaction remain unclear. Here we show that syntaxin 1 levels are reduced by 70% in munc18-1 knockout mice. Pulse-chase analysis in transfected HEK293 cells revealed that Munc18-1 directly promotes the stability of syntaxin 1, consistent with a chaperone function. However, the residual syntaxin 1 in munc18-1 knockout mice is still correctly targeted to synapses and efficiently forms SDS-resistant SNARE complexes, demonstrating that Munc18-1 is not required for syntaxin 1 function as such. These data demonstrate that the Munc18-1 interaction with syntaxin 1 is physiologically important, but does not represent a classical chaperone-substrate relationship. Instead, the presence of SNARE complexes in the absence of membrane fusion in munc18-1 knockout mice indicates that Munc18-1 either controls the spatially correct assembly of core complexes for SNARE-dependent fusion, or acts as a direct component of the fusion machinery itself.     

Conformational change of syntaxin linker region induced by Munc13s initiates SNARE complex formation in synaptic exocytosis

The soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) protein syntaxin-1 adopts a closed conformation when bound to Munc18-1, preventing binding to synaptobrevin-2 and SNAP-25 to form the ternary SNARE complex. Although it is known that the MUN domain of Munc13-1 catalyzes the transition from the Munc18-1/syntaxin-1 complex to the SNARE complex, the molecular mechanism is unclear. Here, we identified two conserved residues (R151, I155) in the syntaxin-1 linker region as key sites for the MUN domain interaction. This interaction is essential for SNARE complex formation in vitro and synaptic vesicle priming in neuronal cultures. Moreover, this interaction is important for a tripartite Munc18-1/syntaxin-1/MUN complex, in which syntaxin-1 still adopts a closed conformation tightly bound to Munc18-1, whereas the syntaxin-1 linker region changes its conformation, similar to that of the LE mutant of syntaxin-1 when bound to Munc18-1. We suggest that the conformational change of the syntaxin-1 linker region induced by Munc13-1 initiates ternary SNARE complex formation in the neuronal system.     

Protein-protein interactions in intracellular membrane fusion

The fusion of intracellular vesicles with their target membranes is an essential feature of the compartmental structure of eukaryotic cells. This process requires proteins that dictate the targeting of a vesicle to the correct cellular location, mediate bilayer fusion and, in some systems, regulate the precise time at which fusion occurs. Recent biophysical and structural studies of these proteins have begun to provide a foundation for understanding their functions at a molecular level.     

A non-canonical target-binding site in Munc18-1 domain 3b for assembling the Mint1-Munc18-1-syntaxin-1 complex

1. Download : Download high-res image (253KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

SNARE protein analog‐mediated membrane fusion

Fusion of lipid membranes to form a single bilayer is an essential process for life and provides important biological functions including neurotransmitter release. Membrane fusion proteins facilitate approximation of interacting membranes to overcome the energy barrier. In case of synaptic transmission, proteins involved are known as soluble N‐ethylmaleimide‐sensitive‐factor attachment receptor (SNARE) proteins. The SNAREs from synaptic vesicles interact with the SNAREs from the target membrane to form a coiled‐coil bundle of four helices, thus pulling the membranes tightly together and initiating fusion. However, it remains unclear how these proteins function at molecular level. Natural systems are often too complex to obtain unambiguous results. Simple model systems mimicking natural proteins in synthetic lipid bilayers are powerful tools for obtaining insights into this essential biological process. An important advantage of such systems is their well‐defined composition, which can be systematically varied in order to fully understand events at molecular level. In this review, selected model systems are presented based upon specific interactions between recognition units embedded in separate lipid bilayers mimicking native SNARE protein‐mediated membrane fusion. Copyright © 2015 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Single calcium channel domain gating of synaptic vesicle fusion at fast synapses; analysis by graphic modeling

At fast-transmitting presynaptic terminals Ca²⁺ enter through voltage gated calcium channels (CaVs) and bind to a synaptic vesicle (SV) -associated calcium sensor (SV-sensor) to gate fusion and discharge. An open CaV generates a high-concentration plume, or nanodomain of Ca²⁺ that dissipates precipitously with distance from the pore. At most fast synapses, such as the frog neuromuscular junction (NMJ), the SV sensors are located sufficiently close to individual CaVs to be gated by single nanodomains. However, at others, such as the mature rodent calyx of Held (calyx of Held), the physiology is more complex with evidence that CaVs that are both close and distant from the SV sensor and it is argued that release is gated primarily by the overlapping Ca²⁺ nanodomains from many CaVs. We devised a 'graphic modeling' method to sum Ca²⁺ from individual CaVs located at varying distances from the SV-sensor to determine the SV release probability and also the fraction of that probability that can be attributed to single domain gating. This method was applied first to simplified, low and high CaV density model release sites and then to published data on the contrasting frog NMJ and the rodent calyx of Held native synapses. We report 3 main predictions: the SV-sensor is positioned very close to the point at which the SV fuses with the membrane; single domain-release gating predominates even at synapses where the SV abuts a large cluster of CaVs, and even relatively remote CaVs can contribute significantly to single domain-based gating.     

Single calcium channel domain gating of synaptic vesicle fusion at fast synapses; analysis by graphic modeling

At fast-transmitting presynaptic terminals Ca²⁺ enter through voltage gated calcium channels (CaVs) and bind to a synaptic vesicle (SV) -associated calcium sensor (SV-sensor) to gate fusion and discharge. An open CaV generates a high-concentration plume, or nanodomain of Ca²⁺ that dissipates precipitously with distance from the pore. At most fast synapses, such as the frog neuromuscular junction (NMJ), the SV sensors are located sufficiently close to individual CaVs to be gated by single nanodomains. However, at others, such as the mature rodent calyx of Held (calyx of Held), the physiology is more complex with evidence that CaVs that are both close and distant from the SV sensor and it is argued that release is gated primarily by the overlapping Ca²⁺ nanodomains from many CaVs. We devised a ''graphic modeling'' method to sum Ca²⁺ from individual CaVs located at varying distances from the SV-sensor to determine the SV release probability and also the fraction of that probability that can be attributed to single domain gating. This method was applied first to simplified, low and high CaV density model release sites and then to published data on the contrasting frog NMJ and the rodent calyx of Held native synapses. We report 3 main predictions: the SV-sensor is positioned very close to the point at which the SV fuses with the membrane; single domain-release gating predominates even at synapses where the SV abuts a large cluster of CaVs, and even relatively remote CaVs can contribute significantly to single domain-based gating.     

Towards reconstitution of membrane fusion mediated by SNAREs and other synaptic proteins

Abstract

Proteoliposomes have been widely used for in vitro studies of membrane fusion mediated by synaptic proteins. Initially, such studies were made with large unsynchronized ensembles of vesicles. Such ensemble assays limited the insights into the SNARE-mediated fusion mechanism that could be obtained from them. Single particle microscopy experiments can alleviate many of these limitations but they pose significant technical challenges. Here we summarize various approaches that have enabled studies of fusion mediated by SNAREs and other synaptic proteins at a single-particle level. Currently available methods are described and their advantages and limitations are discussed.     

HPC‐1/syntaxin 1A and syntaxin 1B play distinct roles in neuronal survival

Two types of syntaxin 1 isoforms, HPC‐1/syntaxin 1A (STX1A) and syntaxin 1B (STX1B), are thought to have similar functions in exocytosis of synaptic vesicles. STX1A^?/? mice which we generated previously develop normally, possibly because of compensation by STX1B. We produced STX1B^?/? mice using targeted gene disruption and investigated their phenotypes. STX1B^?/? mice were born alive, but died before postnatal day 14, unlike STX1A^?/? mice. Morphologically, brain development in STX1B^?/? mice was impaired. In hippocampal neuronal culture, the cell viability of STX1B^?/? neurons was lower than that of WT or STX1A^?/? neurons after 9 days. Interestingly, STX1B^?/? neurons survived on WT or STX1A^?/? glial feeder layers as well as WT neurons. However, STX1B^?/? glial feeder layers were less effective at promoting survival of STX1B^?/? neurons. Conditioned medium from WT or STX1A^?/? glial cells had a similar effect on survival, but that from STX1B^?/? did not promote survival. Furthermore, brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) or neurotrophin‐3 supported survival of STX1B^?/? neurons. BDNF localization in STX1B^?/? glial cells was disrupted, and BDNF secretion from STX1B^?/? glial cells was impaired. These results suggest that STX1A and STX1B may play distinct roles in supporting neuronal survival by glia.

     

The influenza fusion peptide promotes lipid polar head intrusion through hydrogen bonding with phosphates and N‐terminal membrane insertion depth

Influenza infection requires fusion between the virus envelope and a host cell endosomal membrane. The influenza hemagglutinin fusion peptide (FP) is essential to viral membrane fusion. It was recently proposed that FPs would fuse membranes by increasing lipid tail protrusion, a membrane fusion transition state. The details of how FPs induce lipid tail protrusion, however, remain to be elucidated. To decipher the molecular mechanism by which FPs promote lipid tail protrusion, we performed molecular dynamics simulations of the wild‐type (WT) FP, fusogenic mutant F9A, and nonfusogenic mutant W14A in model bilayers. This article presents the peptide–lipid interaction responsible for lipid tail protrusion and a related lipid perturbation, polar head intrusion, where polar heads are sunk under the membrane surface. The backbone amides from the four N‐terminal peptide residues, deeply inserted in the membrane, promoted both perturbations through H bonding with lipid phosphates. Polar head intrusion correlated with peptides N‐terminal insertion depth and activity: the N‐termini of WT and F9A were inserted deeper into the membrane than nonfusogenic W14A. Based on these results, we propose that FP‐induced polar head intrusion would complement lipid tail protrusion in catalyzing membrane fusion by reducing repulsions between juxtaposed membranes headgroups. The presented model provides a framework for further research on membrane fusion and influenza antivirals. Proteins 2014; 82:2118–2127. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Astrocytes with previous chronic exposure to amyloid β‐peptide fragment 1–40 suppress excitatory synaptic transmission

Synaptic dysfunction and neuronal death are responsible for cognitive and behavioral deficits in Alzheimer's disease (AD). It is well known that such neurological abnormalities are preceded by long‐term exposure of amyloid β‐peptide (Aβ) and/or hyperphosphorylated tau prior. In addition to the neurological deficit, astrocytes as a major glial cell type in the brain, significantly participate in the neuropathogenic mechanisms underlying synaptic modulation. Although astrocytes play a significant key role in modulating synaptic transmission, little is known on whether astrocyte dysfunction caused by such long‐term Aβ exposure affects synapse formation and function. Here, we show that synapse formation and synaptic transmission are attenuated in hippocampal‐naïve neurons co‐cultured with astrocytes that have previously experienced chronic Aβ_1‐40 exposure. In this abnormal astrocytic condition, hippocampal neurons exhibit decrements of evoked excitatory post‐synaptic currents (EPSCs) and miniature EPSC frequency. Furthermore, size of readily releasable synaptic pools and number of excitatory synapses were also significantly decreased. Contrary to these negative effects, release probability at individual synapses was significantly increased in the same astrocytic condition. Taken together, our data indicate that lower synaptic transmission caused by astrocytes previously, and chronically, exposed to Aβ1–40 is attributable to a small number of synapses with higher release probability.

     

Tropomyosin is essential in yeast, yet the TPM1 and TPM2 products perform distinct functions

Sequence analysis of chromosome IX of Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed an open reading frame of 166 residues, designated TPM2, having 64.5% sequence identity to TPM1, that encodes the major form of tropomyosin in yeast. Purification and characterization of Tpm2p revealed a protein with the characteristics of a bona fide tropomyosin; it is present in vivo at about one sixth the abundance of Tpm1p. Biochemical and sequence analysis indicates that Tpm2p spans four actin monomers along a filament, whereas Tpmlp spans five. Despite its shorter length, Tpm2p can compete with Tpm1p for binding to F-actin. Over-expression of Tpm2p in vivo alters the axial budding of haploids to a bipolar pattern, and this can be partially suppressed by co-over-expression of Tpm1p. This suggests distinct functions for the two tropomyosins, and indicates that the ratio between them is important for correct morphogenesis. Loss of Tpm2p has no detectable phenotype in otherwise wild type cells, but is lethal in combination with tpm1 delta. Over-expression of Tpm2p does not suppress the growth or cell surface targeting defects associated with tpm1 delta, so the two tropomyosins must perform an essential function, yet are not functionally interchangeable. S. cerevisiae therefore provides a simple system for the study of two tropomyosins having distinct yet overlapping functions.     

L‐OPA1 regulates mitoflash biogenesis independently from membrane fusion

Mitochondrial flashes mediated by optic atrophy 1 (OPA1) fusion protein are bioenergetic responses to stochastic drops in mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψ_m) whose origin is unclear. Using structurally distinct genetically encoded pH‐sensitive probes, we confirm that flashes are matrix alkalinization transients, thereby establishing the pH nature of these events, which we renamed “mitopHlashes”. Probes located in cristae or intermembrane space as verified by electron microscopy do not report pH changes during Δψ_m drops or respiratory chain inhibition. Opa1 ablation does not alter Δψ_m fluctuations but drastically decreases the efficiency of mitopHlash/Δψ_m coupling, which is restored by re‐expressing fusion‐deficient OPA1^K301A and preserved in cells lacking the outer‐membrane fusion proteins MFN1/2 or the OPA1 proteases OMA1 and YME1L, indicating that mitochondrial membrane fusion and OPA1 proteolytic processing are dispensable. pH/Δψ_m uncoupling occurs early during staurosporine‐induced apoptosis and is mitigated by OPA1 overexpression, suggesting that OPA1 maintains mitopHlash competence during stress conditions. We propose that OPA1 stabilizes respiratory chain supercomplexes in a conformation that enables respiring mitochondria to compensate a drop in Δψ_m by an explosive matrix pH flash.     

Sly1 protein bound to Golgi syntaxin Sed5p allows assembly and contributes to specificity of SNARE fusion complexes

Fusion of transport vesicles with their target organelles involves specific membrane proteins, SNAREs, which form tight complexes bridging the membranes to be fused. Evidence from yeast and mammals indicates that Sec1 family proteins act as regulators of membrane fusion by binding to the target membrane SNAREs. In experiments with purified proteins, we now made the observation that the ER to Golgi core SNARE fusion complex could be assembled on syntaxin Sed5p tightly bound to the Sec1-related Sly1p. Sly1p also bound to preassembled SNARE complexes in vitro and was found to be part of a vesicular/target membrane SNARE complex immunoprecipitated from yeast cell lysates. This is in marked contrast to the exocytic SNARE assembly in neuronal cells where high affinity binding of N-Sec1/Munc-18 to syntaxin 1A precluded core SNARE fusion complex formation. We also found that the kinetics of SNARE complex formation in vitro with either Sly1p-bound or free Sed5p was not significantly different. Importantly, several presumably nonphysiological SNARE complexes easily generated with Sed5p did not form when the syntaxin was first bound to Sly1p. This indicates for the first time that a Sec1 family member contributes to the specificity of SNARE complex assembly.     

突触小泡膜蛋白与神经递质释放的局部调节

突触小泡膜蛋白及其在神经递质释放过程中的作用已取得若干研究进展.突触素I、SY蛋白、SO蛋白、SB蛋白、SG蛋白等都是突触小泡膜的重要蛋白质,这些蛋白质在突触小泡的贴靠、膜融合及胞吐作用中起着局部自主性调节作用.     

Opposing functions of two sub‐domains of the SNARE‐complex in neurotransmission

The SNARE‐complex consisting of synaptobrevin‐2/VAMP‐2, SNAP‐25 and syntaxin‐1 is essential for evoked neurotransmission and also involved in spontaneous release. Here, we used cultured autaptic hippocampal neurons from Snap‐25 null mice rescued with mutants challenging the C‐terminal, N‐terminal and middle domains of the SNARE‐bundle to dissect out the involvement of these domains in neurotransmission. We report that the stabilities of two different sub‐domains of the SNARE‐bundle have opposing functions in setting the probability for both spontaneous and evoked neurotransmission. Destabilizing the C‐terminal end of the SNARE‐bundle abolishes spontaneous neurotransmitter release and reduces evoked release probability, indicating that the C‐terminal end promotes both modes of release. In contrast, destabilizing the middle or deleting the N‐terminal end of the SNARE‐bundle increases both spontaneous and evoked release probabilities. In both cases, spontaneous release was affected more than evoked neurotransmission. In addition, the N‐terminal deletion delays vesicle priming after a high‐frequency train. We propose that the stability of N‐terminal two‐thirds of the SNARE‐bundle has a function for vesicle priming and limiting spontaneous release.