Evolution of Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis conception

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that becomes a cause of dementia during atrophic brain changes. There are two distinguished forms of AD: familial early-onset form (FAD, approximately 5% of all cases, develops before age 65, most commonly 40–50) and sporadic late-onset form (SAD, approximately 95% of all cases, develops after 65). Identification of genetic determinants of FAD development and evidence of amyloid-beta peptide’s (Aβ) neurotoxicity as a central event in the cascade of pathological processes significantly expanded the conception of molecular and genetic mechanisms of the disease. However, the question of whether or not the accumulation of Aβ is the triggering factor of more widespread SAD remains open. There are a growing number of arguments for Aβ overproduction being the secondary, concomitant event of AD pathological processes: synaptic failure, hyperphosphorylation of tau protein, neuroinflammation, neuronal loss, and cognitive decline. As one of triggering risk factors of AD development, mitochondrial dysfunction is considered, with the decrease in ATP synthesis and oxidative stress becoming the consequences. However, the specific molecular and genetic mechanisms of AD remain unclear. This is caused by the lack of relevant animal models for studying mechanisms of the disease and objective estimation of pathogenically justified methods of AD prevention and treatment.     

The study of Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is by far the most common dementing illness of late life and is increasing with the ever-growing number of older adults, in particular, in developed countries. The disease is often referred to as the “Long-Goodbye” because the person with the illness slowly becomes lost to everyone a long time before the body finally gives out. Being able to detect AD earlier on during the course of the disease offers better prospects for the future, for AD individuals, their families and friends as well as on the economy, as a whole. Unfortunately, such a detection technique is not yet, available. However, there are a number of promising biological markers (biomarkers) that correlate well with clinical cognitive tests of individuals and/or postmortem histopathological manifestations of the disease, especially when at least two markers are used for the diagnosis. Biosensors are tools that combine a biochemical binding element to a signal conversion unit and are already being used in the study of some AD biomarkers. However, their use in clinical diagnosis remains a challenge. Introduction of nanotechnology leading to nanobiosensors has several potential advantages over other clinical and/or existing analytical tools, including increased assay speed, flexibility, reduced cost of diagnostic testing, potential to deliver molecular diagnostic tools to family general practitioners, and other health care systems. Even more important, nano-based assays have the potential to detect target proteins at attomolar concentration level. They are, therefore, being increasingly exploited for the detection of early metabolic changes associated with diseases. Because brain damage is irreversible, the use of nanotechnology is particularly important in AD and other neurodegenerative disorders. Nanosensors can also facilitate and enable pointofcare-testing (POCT). This article reviews the basic biochemical processes that lead to AD pathology, current biomarkers for AD, and the current role of nanosensor technology for the study of AD biomarkers. Furthermore, it discusses the huge potential of nanosensing to deliver new molecular diagnostic strategies to AD research.     

Mitochondrial DNA variants in a Japanese population of patients with Alzheimer’s disease

The evidence for the role of mitochondria in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has been well investigated, based on the amyloid hypothesis and its relation to the mitochondrial dysfunction due to oxidative stress. However, contrasting reports describe an unclear picture on the relationship between AD and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variations. Therefore, we analyzed complete mtDNA sequences from 153 AD patients and 129 normal control subjects to determine if inherited mtDNA polymorphisms or rare variants, or both contribute to the etiology of late-onset AD. The results reported herein indicate that inherited mtDNA common polymorphisms could not be the single major causes of AD but that some rare variants in the protein-coding-region may have protective effects for high-risk populations with the APOE e4 allele. Furthermore, our results support the idea that the np956–965 poly-c insertion and 856A>G variant might be a riskfactor for AD.     

Trafficking regulation of proteins in Alzheimer’s disease

The β-amyloid (Aβ) peptide has been postulated to be a key determinant in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Aβ is produced through sequential cleavage of the β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) by β- and γ-secretases. APP and relevant secretases are transmembrane proteins and traffic through the secretory pathway in a highly regulated fashion. Perturbation of their intracellular trafficking may affect dynamic interactions among these proteins, thus altering Aβ generation and accelerating disease pathogenesis. Herein, we review recent progress elucidating the regulation of intracellular trafficking of these essential protein components in AD.     

A standard model of Alzheimer’s disease?

ABSTRACT

The recent Research Framework proposed by the US National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association (NIA-AA) recommends that Alzheimer’s disease be defined by its specific biology rather than by non-specific neurodegenerative and syndromal features. By affirming markers of abnormal Aβ and tau proteins as the essential pathobiological signature of Alzheimer’s disease, the Framework tacitly reinforces the amyloid (Aβ) cascade as the leading theory of Alzheimer pathogenesis. In light of recent evidence that the cascade is driven by the misfolding and templated aggregation of Aβ and tau, we believe that an empirically grounded Standard Model of Alzheimer’s pathogenesis is within reach. A Standard Model can clarify and consolidate existing information, contextualize risk factors and the complex disease phenotype, identify testable hypotheses for future research, and pave the most direct path to effective prevention and treatment.     

Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease in body fluids

Various innovative diagnostic methods for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have been developed in view of the increasing preva-lence and consequences of later-life dementia. Biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood for AD are primarily based on the detection of components derived from amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). Published reports on CSF and blood biomarkers in AD indicate that although biomarkers in body fluids may be utilized in the clinical diagnosis of AD, there are no specific markers that permit accurate and reliable diagnosis of early-stage AD or the monitoring of disease pro-gression.     

GPCR,a rider of Alzheimer’s disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia that affects thinking, learning, memory and behavior of older people. Based on the previous studies, three pathogenic pathways are now commonly accepted as the culprits of this disease namely, amyloid-β pathway, tauopathology and cholinergic dysfunction. This review focuses on the current findings on the regulatory roles of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in the pathological progression of AD and discusses the potential of the GPCRs as novel therapeutic targets for AD.     

Tackling neurodegenerative diseases: animal models of Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease

Our ageing society is confronted with a dramatic increase in incidence of age-related neurodegenerative diseases; biomedical research leading to novel therapeutic strategies is crucial to address this problem. Animal models of neurodegenerative conditions are invaluable in improving our understanding of the molecular basis of pathology, potentially revealing novel targets for intervention. Here, we review transgenic animal models of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease reported in mice, zebrafish, Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster. This information will enable researchers to compare different animal models targeting disease-associated molecules by genomic engineering and to facilitate the development of novel animal models for any particular study, depending on the ultimate research goals.     

Homeostasis of metals in the progression of Alzheimer’s disease

In order to study the involvement of metals in the progression of Alzheimer’s disease, serum samples from patients with Alzheimer and mild cognitive impairment were investigated. For this purpose, metal content was analyzed after size-fractionation of species and then, inter-element and inter-fraction ratios were computed. In this way, the analysis allowed discovering changes that could be used as markers of disease, but also provided a new insight into the interactions in the homeostasis of elements in neurodegeneration and its progression. Aluminum and labile forms of iron and copper were increased in demented patients, while manganese, zinc and selenium were reduced. Interestingly, levels of different elements, principally iron, aluminum and manganese, were closely inter-related, which could evidence a complex interdependency between the homeostasis of the different metals in this disorder. On the other hand, imbalances in metabolism of copper, zinc and selenium could be associated to abnormal redox status. Therefore, this study may contribute to our understanding of the pathological mechanisms related to metals in Alzheimer’s disease.     

New approaches for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most prevalent chronic neurodegenerative disease. Current approved therapies are symptomatic treatments having some effect on cognitive function. Therapies that target β-amyloid (Aβ) have been the focus of efforts to develop a disease modification treatment for AD but these approaches have failed to show any clinical benefit so far. Beyond the ‘Aβ hypothesis’, there are a number of newer approaches to treat AD with neuroinflammation emerging as a very active area of research based on risk gene analysis. This short review will summarize approved drug therapies, recent clinical trials and new approaches for the treatment of AD.     

Network-wide dysregulation of calcium homeostasis in Alzheimer’s disease

Dysregulation of intracellular Ca²⁺ homeostasis has been proposed as a common proximal cause of neural dysfunction during aging and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In this context, aberrant Ca²⁺ signaling has been viewed as a neuronal phenomenon mostly related to the dysfunction of intracellular Ca²⁺ stores. However, recent data suggest that, in AD, Ca²⁺ dyshomeostasis is not restricted to neurons but represents a global phenomenon affecting virtually all cells in the brain. AD-related aberrant Ca²⁺ signaling in astrocytes and microglia, which is activated during the disease, probably contributes profoundly to an inflammatory response that, in turn, impacts neuronal Ca²⁺ homeostasis and brain function. Based on recent data obtained in vivo and in vitro, we propose that bidirectional interactions between the inflammatory responses of glial cells and aberrant Ca²⁺ signaling represent a vicious cycle accelerating disease progression.     

Recent cerebrospinal fluid biomarker studies of Alzheimer’s disease

Alzheimer’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder and the most common form of dementia. The disease is confirmed by the presence of neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in the cerebral cortex at autopsy, but the accuracy of antemortem diagnosis, especially at the early stages of the disease, is not ideal. Thus, there is a substantial need for the discovery and validation of diagnostic biomarkers. Many Alzheimer’s disease biomarker discovery studies emphasize the analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) because of its close association with the brain. Here, we review recent mass spectrometry-based studies of Alzheimer’s disease CSF, and additionally discuss issues associated with CSF in proteomics studies.     

Mathematical model on Alzheimer’s disease

Background

Alzheimer disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that destroys memory and cognitive skills. AD is characterized by the presence of two types of neuropathological hallmarks: extracellular plaques consisting of amyloid β-peptides and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles of hyperphosphorylated tau proteins. The disease affects 5 million people in the United States and 44 million world-wide. Currently there is no drug that can cure, stop or even slow the progression of the disease. If no cure is found, by 2050 the number of alzheimer’s patients in the U.S. will reach 15 million and the cost of caring for them will exceed $ 1 trillion annually.

Results

The present paper develops a mathematical model of AD that includes neurons, astrocytes, microglias and peripheral macrophages, as well as amyloid β aggregation and hyperphosphorylated tau proteins. The model is represented by a system of partial differential equations. The model is used to simulate the effect of drugs that either failed in clinical trials, or are currently in clinical trials.

Conclusions

Based on these simulations it is suggested that combined therapy with TNF- α inhibitor and anti amyloid β could yield significant efficacy in slowing the progression of AD.

     

A brief overview of amyloids and Alzheimer’s disease

Amyloid fibrils are self-assembled fibrous protein aggregates that are associated with a number of presently incurable diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Millions of people worldwide suffer from amyloid diseases. This review summarizes the unique cross-β structure of amyloid fibrils, morphological variations, the kinetics of amyloid fibril formation, and the cytotoxic effects of these fibrils and oligomers. Alzheimer’s disease is also explored as an example of an amyloid disease to show the various approaches to treat these amyloid diseases. Finally, this review investigates the nanotechnological and biological applications of amyloid fibrils; as well as a summary of the typical biological pathways involved in the disposal of amyloid fibrils and their precursors.     

TREM2 in Alzheimer’s disease

Recent works have demonstrated a rare functional variant (R47H) in triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (TREM) 2 gene, encoding TREM2 protein, increase susceptibility to late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD), with an odds ratio similar to that of the apolipoprotein E ε4 allele. The reduced function of TREM2 was speculated to be the main cause in the pathogenic effects of this risk variant, and TREM2 is highly expressed in white matter, as well as in the hippocampus and neocortex, which is partly consistent with the pathological features reported in AD brain, indicating the possible involvement of TREM2 in AD pathogenesis. Emerging evidence has demonstrated that TREM2 could suppress inflammatory response by repression of microglia-mediated cytokine production and secretion, which may prevent inflammation-induced bystander damage of neurons. TREM2 also participates in the regulation of phagocytic pathways that are responsible for the removal of neuronal debris. In this article, we review the recent epidemiological findings of TREM2 that related with late-onset AD and speculate the possible roles of TREM2 in progression of this disease. Based on the potential protective actions of TREM2 in AD pathogenesis, targeting TREM2 might provide new opportunities for AD treatment.