Denitrification in the top and sub soil of grassland on peat soils

Denitrification is an important process in the nitrogen (N) balance of intensively managed grassland, especially on poorly drained peat soils. Aim of this study was to quantify the N loss through denitrification in the top and sub soil of grassland on peat soils. Sampling took place at 2 sites with both control (0 N) and N fertilised (+ N) treatments. Main difference between the sites was the ground water level. Denitrification was measured on a weekly basis for 2 years with a soil core incubation technique using acetylene (C₂H₂) inhibition. Soil cores were taken from the top soil (0–20 cm depth) and the sub soil (20–40 cm depth) and incubated in containers for 24 hours. The denitrification rate was calculated from the nitrous oxide production between 4 and 24 hours of incubation. Denitrification capacities of the soils and the soil layers were also determined.The top soil was the major layer for denitrification with losses ranging from 9 to 26 kg N ha^–1 yr^–1 from the O N treatment. Losses from the top soil of the + N treatment ranged from 13 to 49 kg N ha^–1 yr^–1. The sub soil contributed, on average, 20% of the total denitrification losses from the 0–40 layer. Losses from the 0–40 cm layer were 2 times higher on the + N treatment than on the O N treatment and totalled up to 70 kg N ha^–1 yr^–1. Significant correlation coefficients were found between denitrification activity on the one hand, and ground water level, water filled pore space and nitrate content on the other, in the top soil but not in the sub soil. The denitrification capacity experiment showed that the availability of easily decomposable organic carbon was an important limiting factor for the denitrification activity in the sub soil of these peat soils.     

Nitrogen losses due to denitrification from cattle slurry injected into grassland soil with and without a nitrification inhibitor

Injection of cattle slurry into a grassland soil decreases NH₃ volatilisation and increases N utilisation by the sward, but may also increase denitrification losses. Denitrification rates were measured using a soil core incubation technique involving acetylene inhibition, following injection of cattle slurry (67 t ha^–1) into a grassland soil. The slurry was injected, either with or without a nitrification inhibitor (DCD), on 8 December 1989. Two-weekly measurements were carried out up to 18 weeks after injection. Compared to the control plot, denitrification rates were significantly higher after slurry injection. Addition of DCD to the slurry almost eliminated this effect. Estimated N-losses during 18 weeks after injection were 0.9 (control), 4.1 (+DCD), and 13.7 (-DCD) kg N ha^–1. Denitrification losses were 7% of the injected NH₄-N and decreased to 2% of the injected NH₄-N when DCD was added. Denitrification could account for about 19% of the difference in apparent recovery of N from slurry injected with and without DCD. The results suggested that considerable amounts of NO₃ ^– were lost due to leaching.     

Denitrification and N2O emission from urine-affected grassland soil

Denitrification and N₂O emission rates were measured following two applications of artificial urine (40 g urine-N m^–2) to a perennial rye-grass sward on sandy soil. To distinguish between N₂O emission from denitrification or nitrification, urine was also applied with a nitrification inhibitor (dicyandiamide, DCD). During a 14 day period following each application, the soil was frequently sampled, and incubated with and without acetylene to measure denitrification and N₂O emission rates, respectively.Urine application significantly increased denitrification and N₂O emission rates up to 14 days after application, with rates amounting to 0.9 and 0.6 g N m^–2 day^–1 (9 and 6 kg N ha^–1 day^–1), respectively. When DCD was added to the urine, N₂O emission rates were significantly lower from 3 to 7 days after urine application onwards. Denitrification was the main source of N₂O immediately following each urine application. 14 days after the first application, when soil water contents dropped to 15% (v/v) N₂O mainly derived from nitrification.Total denitrification losses during the 14 day periods were 7 g N m^–2, or 18% of the urine-N applied. Total N₂O emission losses were 6.5 and 3 g N m^–2, or 16% and 8% of the urine-N applied for the two periods. The minimum estimations of denitrification and N₂O emission losses from urine-affected soil were 45 to 55 kg N ha^–1 year^–1, and 20 to 50 kg N ha^–1 year^–1, respectively.     

Seasonal dynamics of denitrification activity in two water meadows

Seasonal variation in denitrification activity was measured in twoflooded water meadows, one on peaty and one on sandy soil, over a three-yearperiod. Measurements were taken during flooded and drained periods, usingthe acetylene-blockage technique, and the rates were compared to massbalance estimates of nitrate removal in the percolating water.Denitrification activity was higher in sandy soil than in peaty soil. Higherwater infiltration rate and thereby higher nitrate load was considered to bethe cause of the higher denitrification in the sandy soil. Floodingsignificantly increased denitrification, and the rates were higher in autumnand winter than in spring. This was considered to be a result of highernitrogen concentration in inflowing stream water during winter. Annualdenitrification was estimated to 430–460 kg N ha^-1yr^-1 in the sandy soil meadow, and 220 kg N ha^-1yr^-1 in the peaty soil meadow. In the sandy soil there was alarge discrepancy between nitrate removal rates and denitrification rates,which can be explained by nitrification of ammonium released from the soil.In the peaty soil nitrate disappearance and denitrification correspondedfairly well.     

Nitrogen inputs and losses from New Zealand dairy farmlets, as affected by nitrogen fertilizer application: year one

Inputs and losses of nitrogen (N) were determined in dairy cow farmlets receiving 0, 225 or 360 kg N ha^-1 (in split applications as urea) in the first year of a large grazing experiment near Hamilton, New Zealand. Cows grazed perennial ryegrass/white clover pastures all year round on a free-draining soil. N₂ fixation was estimated (using ¹⁵N dilution) to be 212, 165 and 74 kg N ha^-1 yr^-1 in the 0, 225 and 360 N treatments, respectively. The intermediate N rate had little effect on clover growth during spring but favoured more total pasture cover in summer and autumn, thereby reducing overgrazing and resulting in 140% more clover growth during the latter period.Removal of N in milk was 76,89 and 92 kg N ha^-1 in the 0, 225 and 360 N treatments, respectively. Denitrification losses were low (7–14 kg N ha^-1 yr^-1), increased with N application, and occurred predominantly during winter. Ammonia volatilization was estimated by micrometeorological mass balance at 15, 45 and 63 kg N ha^-1 yr^-1 in the 0, 225 and 360 N treatments, respectively. Most of the increase in ammonia loss was attributed to direct loss after application of the urea fertilizer.Leaching of nitrate was estimated (using ceramic cup samplers at 1 m soil depth, in conjunction with lysimeters) to be 13, 18 and 31 kg N ha^-1 yr^-1 in a year of relatively low rainfall (990 mm yr^-1) and drainage (170–210 mm yr^-1). Drainage was lower in the N fertilized treatments and this was attributed to enhanced evapotranspiration associated with increased grass growth.Nitrate-N concentrations in leachates increased gradually over time to 30 mg L^-1 in the 360 N treatment whereas there was little temporal variation evident in the 0 (mean 6.4 mg L^-1) and 225 (mean 10.1 mg L^-1) N treatments. Thus, the 360 N treatment had a major effect by greatly reducing N₂ fixation and increasing N losses, whereas the 225 N treatment had little effect on N₂ fixation or on nitrate leaching. However, these results refer to the first year of the experiment and further measurements over time will determine the longer-term effects of these treatments on N inputs, transformations and losses.     

Differences among maize cultivars in the utilization of soil nitrate and the related losses of nitrate through leaching

In a 2-year field experiment conducted on a Gleyic Luvisol in Stuttgart-Hohenheim one experimental and nine commercial maize cultivars were compared for their ability to utilize soil nitrate and to reduce related losses of nitrate through leaching. Soil nitrate was monitored periodically in CaCl₂ extracts and in suction cup water. Nitrate concentrations in suction water were generally higher than in CaCl₂ extracts. Both methods revealed that all cultivars examined were able to extract nitrate down to a soil depth of at least 120 cm (1988 season) or 150 cm (1987 season). Significant differences among the cultivars existed in nitrate depletion particularly in the subsoil. At harvest, residual nitrate in the upper 150 cm of the profile ranged from 73–110 kg N ha^–1 in 1987 and from 59–119 kg N ha^–1 in 1988. Residual nitrate was closely correlated with nitrate losses by leaching because water infiltration at 120 cm soil depth started 4 weeks after harvest (1987) or immediately after harvest (1988) and continued until early summer of the following year. The calculated amount of nitrate lost by leaching was strongly influenced by the method of calculation. During the winter of 1987/88 nitrate leaching ranged from 57–84 kg N ha^–1 (suction cups) and 40–55 kg N ha^–1 (CaCl₂ extracts), respectively. The corresponding values for the winter of 1988/89 were 47–79 and 20–39 kg N ha^–1, respectively. ei]Section editor: B E Clothier     

The fate of labelled15N urea and ammonium nitrate applied to a winter wheat crop

Labelled urea or ammonium nitrate was applied to winter wheat growing on a loamy soil in Northern France. Two applications of fertilizer were given: 50 kg N ha^–1 at tillering (early March) and 110 kg N ha^–1 at the beginning of stem elongation (mid-April). The kinetics of urea hydrolysis, nitrification of ammonium and the disappearance of inorganic nitrogen were followed at frequent intervals. Inorganic nitrogen soon disappeared, mainly immobilized by soil microflora and absorbed by the crop. Net immobilization of fertilizer N occured at a very similar rate for urea and ammonium nitrate. Maximum immobilization (16 kg N ha¹) was found at harvest for the first dressing and at anthesis for the second dressing (23 kg N ha¹). During the nitrification period, the labelled ammonium pool was immobilized two to three times faster than the labelled nitrate pool. No significant net¹⁵N remineralization was found during the growth cycle.The actual denitrification and volatilization losses were probably more important than indicated from calculations made by extrapolation of fluxes measured over short intervals. However microbial immobilization was the most important of the processes which compete with plant uptake for nitrogen.     

The nitrogen cycle in shallow water sediment systems of rice fields Part III: The influence of N-application on the yield of rice

Fertilizer application to rice-fields in the river-deltas in the Mediterranean area is a potential menace for wildlife protection, through eutrophication.Fertilizer use shows a trend of increasing rates of N application. A rate for N of 200 kg ha^–1 has become normal and a rate of 400 kg ha^–1 has already been recorded.Denitrification causes large losses of N with the result that more fertilizer is applied. This is especially true for the Camargue (S-France), where N is applied long before the rice (Aryza sativa) can take it up.Therefore we have tried to develop techniques which need the application of smaller amounts of N which are used more efficiently. In order to do this we tried to establish a N budget for rice-fields.Experiments were therefore set up in the field (plots of 550 m²) and in pots (2–3 l). Our results suggest that a late application of N (e.g. when the rice shows signs of N-deficiency by becoming yellowish), but at lower concentrations (70 kg ha^–1) can produce the same ultimate yield. The introduction of carp without any further input of N produced the same final yield.The N budget shows that 15±1.5 g m^–2 of N is needed for a normal crop. N losses due to denitrification may be as high as 12.2–13.6 g m^–2 of N. The input by irrigation water may provide up to about 20% of the input; N fixation is negligible. We estimate that 25–50% of the N missing in the budget comes from minderalization of the organic N pool in the soil. Denitrification may render part of this pool bio-available by oxidation. In sum, this work has revealed some surprising effects with potentially important consequences for farming practice and, in consequence, for conservation.     

Denitrification and N2O emissions from a UK pasture soil following the early spring application of cattle slurry and mineral fertiliser

Total denitrification and nitrous oxide (N₂O) losses were measured from three contrasting dairy management systems representing good commercial practice (system 1), production maintained but with reduced N losses (system 2); and nitrate leaching less than 50 mg L^-1 but with reduced production (system 3). Measurements were made following mineral fertiliser application and from two plot experiments where four treatments were applied: control, NH₄NO₃ at 60 kg N ha^-1, cattle slurry applied to the surface (equivalent to 45 kg N ha^-1), and cattle slurry injected. Despite low soil temperatures (<6 °C) and low rainfall (<3 mm), total denitrification and N₂O losses peaked at 56 and 16 g N ha^-1 d^-1, respectively. Total denitrification losses decreased: system 1 system 2 > system 3, whereas N₂O losses decreased: system 2 > system 3 > system 1. Total denitrification losses tended to decrease with decreasing fertiliser application rate, whereas fertiliser application rate was not the sole determinant of the N₂O loss. The system 3 field was injected with cattle slurry for 2 yr, system 2 received some slurry by injection and system 1 received slurry to the surface. Thus, the amount, timing and method of previous cattle slurry application was important in determining the loss following subsequent fertiliser application. For the plot experiments, total denitrification and N₂O losses decreased in the order: slurry injected > mineral fertiliser > slurry applied to the surface > control for 5 days following application. However, 16 and 19 days after application, N₂O losses above the control were measured from plots that had received cattle slurry. It was inferred that the application of cattle slurry to the pasture soil stimulated greater N₂O production and increased losses over a longer time period compared with mineral fertiliser additions.     

The role of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Calamagrostis</Emphasis> communities in preventing soil acidification and base cation losses in a deforested mountain area affected by acid deposition

The effects of grass growth and N deposition on the leaching of nutrients from forest soil were studied in a lysimeter experiment performed in the Moravian-Silesian Beskydy Mts. (the Czech Republic). It was assumed that the grass sward formed on sites deforested due to forest decline would improve the soil environment. Lysimeters with growing acidophilous grasses (Calamagrostis arundinacea and C. villosa), common on clear-cut areas, and with unplanted bare forest soil were installed in the deforested area affected by air pollution. Wet bulk deposition of sulphur in SO₄^2– corresponded to 21.6–40.1 kg ha^–1 and nitrogen in NH₄⁺ and NO₃^– to 8.9–17.4 kg N ha^–1, with a rain water pH of 4.39–4.59 and conductivity of 18.6–36.4 S cm^–1 during the growing seasons 1997–1999. In addition, the lysimeters were treated with 50 kg N ha^–1 yr^–1 as ammonium nitrate during the 3 years of the experiment. Rapid growth of planted grasses resulted in a very fast formation of both above- and below-ground biomass and a large accumulation of nitrogen in the tissue of growing grasses. The greatest differences in N accumulation in aboveground biomass were observed at the end of the third growing season; in C. villosa and C. arundinacea, respectively, 2.66 and 3.44 g N m^–2 after addition of nitrogen and 1.34 and 2.39 g N m^–2 in control. Greater amounts of nitrogen were assessed in below-ground plant parts (9.93–12.97 g N m^–2 in C. villosa and 4.29–4.39 g N m^–2 in C. arundinacea). During the second and third year of experiment, the following effects were the most pronounced: the presence of growing grasses resulted in a decrease of both the acidity and conductivity of lysimetric water and in a lower amount of leached nitrogen, especially of nitrates. Leaching of base cations (Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺) was two to three times lower than from bare soil without grasses. An excess of labile Al³⁺ was substantially eliminated in treatments with grasses. Enhanced N input increased significantly the acidity and losses of nutrients only in unplanted lysimeters. The leaching of N from treatments with grasses (3.9–5.6 kg N ha^–1) was 31–46% of the amount of N in wet deposition. However, the amount of leached N (4.2–6.0 kg N ha^–1) after N application was only 7.1–8.9% of total N input. After a short three year period, the features of soil with planted grasses indicated a slight improvement: higher pH values and Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ contents. The ability of these grass stands to reduce the excess nitrogen in soil is the principal mechanism modifying the negative impact on sites deforested by acid depositions. Thus it is suggested that grass sward formation partly eliminates negative processes associated with soil acidification and has a positive effect on the reduction of nutrient losses from the soil.     

Transformation of15N-labelled urea and its modified forms in tropical wetland rice culture

Summary The fate of 100 kg N ha^–1 applied as¹⁵N-urea and its modified forms was followed in 4 successive field-grown wetland rice crops in a vertisol. The first wet season crop recovered about 27 to 36.6% of the applied N depending upon the N source. In subsequent seasons the average uptake was very small and it gradually decreased from 1.4 to 0.5 kg N ha^–1 although about 18 to 20, 12 to 17 and 14 to 18 kg ha^–1 residual fertilizer N was available in the root zone after harvest of first, second and third crops, respectively. The average uptake of the residual fertilizer N was only 7.6% in the second crop and it decreased to 4.5% in the third and to 3.2% in the fourth crop although all these crops were adequately fertilized with unlabelled urea. The basal application of neem coated urea was more effective in controlling the leaching loss of labelled NH₄+NO₃–N than split application of uncoated urea. In the first 3 seasons in which¹⁵N was detectable, the loss of fertilizer N through leaching as NH₄+NO₃–N amounted to 0.5 kg ha^–1 from neem-coated urea, 1.5 kg from split urea and 4.1 kg from coal tar-coated urea. At the end of 4 crops, most of the labelled fertilizer N (about 69% on average) was located in the upper 0–20 cm soil layer showing very little movement beyond this depth. In the profile sampled upto 60 cm depth, totally about 13.8 kg labelled fertilizer N ha^–1 from neem-coated urea, 12.7 kg from coal-tar coated urea, and 11.8 kg from split urea were recovered. The average recovery of labelled urea-N in crops and soil during the entire experimental period ranged between 42 and 51%. After correcting for leaching losses, the remaining 47 to 56% appeared to have been lost through ammonia volatilization and denitrification.     

Cycling of nitrogen in modern agricultural systems

Summary Agro-ecosystems have developed from mixed- and multiple-cropping systems with relatively closed N cycles to intensively managed monocultures with large N inputs in the form of commercial fertilizers. Cultivation of increasingly larger areas of land has resulted in substantial losses of soil organic matter and N. Also, the move from slash and burn agriculture to intensively ploughed systems has resulted in losses through increased erosion.The use of N fertilizers has increased rapidly toca. 60 Tg N yr^–1 (1980/81), which is equivalent to at least 40% of the N fixed biologically in all terrestrial systems and 36% more than is fixed in all croplands. On a global scale, the major losses of N from agro-ecosystems are estimated to be: harvest, 30 Tg; leaching, 2 Tg; erosion, 2–20 Tg; denitrification 1–44 Tg; and ammonia volatilization, 13–23 Tg. However, the data base is very crude and several estimates may be wrong by as much as one order of magnitude.Additions of N fertilizers have both direct and indirect effects on soil microorganisms. The possible importance of such effects is briefly discussed and a specific example is given on long-term effects on soil microbial biomass and nitrification rates in 27-year-old cropping systems with different N additions: (i) 0 kg N ha^–1 yr^–1, (ii) 80 kg N ha^–1 yr^–1, (iii) farmyard manureca. 80 kg N ha^–1 yr^–1.Few detailed N budgets exist for agro-ecosystems, despite its major importance as a limiting plant nutrient and the large losses of N from such systems. In conclusion, preliminary nitrogen budgets for four cropping systems (barley receiving 0 or 120 kg N ha^–1 yr^–1; meadow fescue ley with 200 kg N ha^–1 yr^–1 and a lucerne ley) are presented, with special attention to N flow through the soil organisms.Keynote address     

Soil N mineralization and nitrification in relation to nitrogen solution chemistry in a small forested watershed

Spatial variations in soil processes regulating mineral N losses to streams were studied in a small watershed near Toronto, Ontario. Annual net N mineralization in the 0–8 cm soil was measured in adjacent upland and riparian forest stands using in situ soil incubations from April 1985 to 1987. Mean annual rates of soil N mineralization and nitrification were higher in a maple soil (93.8 and 87.0 kg.ha^–1) than in a pine soil (23.3 and 8.2 kg.ha^–1 ). Very low mean rates of mineralization (3.3 kg.ha^–1) and nitrification (3.4 kg.ha^–1) were found in a riparian hemlock stand. Average NO₃-N concentrations in soil solutions were 0.3–1.0 mg.L^–1 in the maple stand and >0.06mg.L^–1 in the pine stand. Concentrations of NO₃–N in shallow ground water and stream water were 3–4× greater in a maple subwatershed than in a pine subwatershed. Rapid N uptake by vegetation was an important mechanism reducing solution losses of NO₃–N in the maple stand. Low rates of nitrification were mainly responsible for negligible NO₃–N solution losses in the pine stand.     

Key processes of the nitrogen cycle in an irrigated and a non-irrigated grazed pasture

The paper presents integrated measurements of N fixation, net mineralisation, pasture yield and change in soil mineral N over a 12 month period for dairy pastures on a sandy loam soil in the South East of South Australia. The two adjacent pastures studied were an irrigated perennial white clover-ryegrass and an annual non-irrigated subterranean clover with mixed annual grasses. This produced the most comprehensive mineral N balance reported for grazed pastures, to the authors' knowledge, allowing calculation of gaseous and leaching losses of N (210 kg ha^–1 in the irrigated and paddock and 81 kg ha^–1 in the non irrigated paddock) primarily from urine patches. In both paddocks these losses were about three times the N yield in milk (61 and 28 kg N ha^–1 respectively) and were replenished by biological N fixation (294 and 100 kg N ha^–1). However, mineralisation of soil organic N, excretal N and pasture residues (687 and 438 kg N ha^–1) was the major source of mineral N for cycling and losses. The results demonstrate the enormous impact of pasture management on N fluxes and reinforce the importance of livestock urine on the magnitude of N fluxes including gaseous and leaching losses.     

Changes in soil mineral nitrogen during and after 3-year and 5-year set-aside and nitrate leaching losses after ploughing out the 5-year plant covers in the UK

The management and effects of 3-year and 5-year set-aside covers on soil mineral nitrogen (SMN, 0.0–0.9 m) were studied at six sites in England. Soil mineral N was measured annually in autumn and spring during the period of set-aside cover, with more frequent SMN sampling over the first winter after ploughing out the covers. Spring SMN was measured in the second year after set-aside. Nitrate leaching losses were also measured at three sites in the first winter after destruction of the 5-year set-aside covers. Winter cereals were grown in both test years after each set-aside period.Amounts of both autumn and spring SMN in the perennial rye-grass (PRG), perennial rye-grass/white clover (PRG/WC) and natural regeneration (NR) covers were generally less than, or similar to those in the continuous arable treatment during each year of set-aside, indicating a slightly smaller nitrate leaching risk under set-aside management. Slight increases in autumn SMN, and hence leaching potential were, however, observed under PRG/WC in the fourth and fifth years, compared with continuous arable cropping.Ploughing out of both 3-year and 5-year covers increased soil N supply and potential nitrate leaching losses over winter, compared with continuous arable cropping. By the following spring, mean increases across all sites in amounts of SMN after 3-year covers of PRG, NR and PRG/WC were 14, 18 and 33 kg ha^–1 N, respectively, compared with the arable rotation. Equivalent increases in spring SMN following destruction of the 5-year set-aside covers were almost identical, at 17, 19 and 33 kg ha^–1, respectively, although only the ploughed-out PRG/WC covers increased SMN at the clay sites. Measured nitrate leaching losses in the first winter after 5-year set-aside were greatest after PRG/WC at two sites on shallow chalk but greatest after NR, which had a naturally large clover content, at the third site which was on a sandy soil. However, the leaching losses after set-aside were relatively small, relative to typical losses after ploughing out intensively managed grass or grass/clover swards, and would have been compensated for by potentially less leaching during set-aside.Spring SMN measurements in the second year after ploughing out the set-aside covers, showed negligible or, for PRG/WC, only slight increases (12 – 18 kg ha^–1) in residual soil N supply after both 3-year and 5-year covers, compared to continuous arable cropping. The extra N mineralisation after cover destruction justified small reductions in fertiliser N inputs for the first, but not second crop following either 3- or 5-year set-aside, unless the cover had contained a large clover content. Both 3-year and 5-year set-aside covers had minimal or no effect on either organic matter content, apart from a slight increase in the PRG/WC treatments, or extractable phosphorus, potassium and magnesium status in the topsoil.     

Comparison of N losses (NO − 3, N 2O, NO) from surface applied, injected or amended (DCD) pig slurry of an irrigated soil in a Mediterranean climate

Nitrous oxide (N ₂O), nitric oxide (NO), denitrification losses and NO^–₃ leaching from an irrigated sward were quantified under Mediterranean conditions. The effect of injected pig slurry (IPS) with and without the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) was evaluated and also compared with that of a surface pig slurry application (SPS) and a control treatment (Control) without fertiliser. After application, fluxes of NO and N ₂O peaked from SPS (3.06 mg NO-N m ^–2 d ^–1 and 108 mg N ₂O-N m ^–2 d ^–1) and IPS (3.50 mg NO-N m ^–2 d ^–1 and 105 mg N ₂O-N m ^–2 d ^–1). However, when irrigation was applied, N ₂O and NO emissions declined. The total N ₂O and denitrification losses were slightly large from IPS than from SPS, although the differences were not significant (P < 0.05). Emission of NO was not affected by the method of pig slurry application. DCD inhibited nitrification during the first 20–30 days and reduced N ₂O and NO emissions from pig slurry by at least 46% and 37%, respectively. Considering the 215 days following pig slurry application, the emission factor of N ₂O based on N fertiliser was 1.60% (SPS), 2.95% (IPS), and 0.50% (IPS + DCD). The emission factor for NO was 0.14% (SPS), 0.12% (IPS), and 0.02% (IPS + DCD). Environmental conditions of the crop favoured the denitrification process as the most important source of N ₂O during the experimental period. The differences in the denitrification rate between treatments could be explained by the pattern of water soluble carbon (WSC), that was the highest value in injected pig slurry (with and without DCD). Due to low drainage (5% of water applied), leaching losses of NO₃^– were lower than those of denitrification from the upper soil layer (0–10 cm) in all treatments and especially with IPS + DCD, where the nitrification inhibitor was very efficient in reducing leaching losses.     

The fate of 15N-labelled nitrate additions to a northern hardwood forest in eastern Maine,USA

We followed the movements of ¹⁵N-labelled nitrate additions into biomass and soil pools of experimental plots (15×15 m each) in a mid-successional beech-maple-birch-spruce forest in order to identify sinks for nitrate inputs to a forest ecosystem. Replicate plots (n=3) were spray-irrigated with either 28 or 56 kg N ha^–1 year^–1 using ¹⁵N-labelled nitric acid solutions (¹⁵N = 344 ) during four successive growing seasons (April–October). The ¹⁵N contents of foliage, bolewood, forests floor and mineral soil (0–5 cm) increased during the course of treatments. Mass balance calculations showed that one-fourth to one-third of the nitrate applied to forest plots was assimilated into and retained by above ground plant tissues and surface soil horizons at both rates of nitrate application. Plant and microbial assimilation were of approximately equal importance in retaining nitrate additions to this forest. Nitrate use among tree species varied, however, with red spruce showing lower rates of nitrate assimilation into foliage and bolewood than American beech and other deciduous species.     

Seasonal Patterns of Soil Respiration and Related Soil Biochemical Properties under Nitrogen Addition in Winter Wheat Field

Understanding the changes of soil respiration under increasing N fertilizer in cropland ecosystems is crucial to accurately predicting global warming. This study explored seasonal variations of soil respiration and its controlling biochemical properties under a gradient of Nitrogen addition during two consecutive winter wheat growing seasons (2013–2015). N was applied at four different levels: 0, 120, 180 and 240 kg N ha^-1 year^-1 (denoted as N0, N12, N18 and N24, respectively). Soil respiration exhibited significant seasonal variation and was significantly affected by soil temperature with Q₁₀ ranging from 2.04 to 2.46 and from 1.49 to 1.53 during 2013–2014 and 2014–2015 winter wheat growing season, respectively. Soil moisture had no significant effect on soil respiration during 2013–2014 winter wheat growing season but showed a significant and negative correlation with soil respiration during 2014–2015 winter wheat growing season. Soil respiration under N24 treatment was significantly higher than N0 treatment. Averaged over the two growing seasons, N12, N18 and N24 significantly increased soil respiration by 13.4, 16.4 and 25.4% compared with N0, respectively. N addition also significantly increased easily extractable glomalin-related soil protein (EEG), soil organic carbon (SOC), total N, ammonium N and nitrate N contents. In addition, soil respiration was significantly and positively correlated with β-glucosidase activity, EEG, SOC, total N, ammonium N and nitrate N contents. The results indicated that high N fertilization improved soil chemical properties, but significantly increased soil respiration.     

Competition in tree row agroforestry systems. 2. Distribution, dynamics and uptake of soil inorganic N

The effect of tree row species on the distribution of soil inorganic N and the biomass growth and N uptake of trees and crops was investigated beneath a Grevillea robustaA. Cunn. ex R. Br. (grevillea) tree row and Senna spectabilisDC. (senna) hedgerow grown with Zea mays L. (maize) and a sole maize crop, during one cropping season. The hypothesis was that a tree with a large nutrient uptake would have a greater competitive effect upon coexisting plants than a tree that takes up less and internally cycles nutrients. The field study was conducted on a kaolinitic Oxisol in the sub-humid highlands of western Kenya. Soil nitrate and ammonium were measured to 300 cm depth and 525 cm distance from the tree rows, before and after maize cropping. Ammonium concentrations were small and did not change significantly during the cropping season. There was > 8 mg nitrate kg^–1 in the upper 60 cm and at 90–180 cm depth at the start of the season, except within 300 cm of the senna hedgerow where concentrations were smaller. During the season, nitrate in the grevillea-maize system only decreased in the upper 60 cm, whereas nitrate decreased at almost every depth and distance from the senna hedgerow. Inorganic N (nitrate plus ammonium) decreased by 94 kg ha^–1 in the senna-maize system and 33 kg ha^–1 in the grevillea-maize system.The aboveground N content of the trees increased by 23 kg ha^–1 for grevillea and 39 kg ha^–1 for senna. Nitrogen uptake by maize was 85 kg ha^–1 when grown with grevillea and 65 kg ha^–1 with senna. Assuming a mineralisation input of 50 kg N ha^–1season^–1, the decrease in inorganic soil N approximately equalled plant N uptake in the grevillea-maize system, but exceeded that in the senna-maize system. Pruning and litter fall removed about 14 kg N ha^–1 a^–1 from grevillea, and > 75 kg N ha^–1 a^–1 from senna. The removal of pruned material from an agroforestry system may lead to nutrient mining and a decline in productivity.     

Denitrification in Aquifer Soil and Nearshore Marine Sediments Influenced by Groundwater Nitrate

We estimated rates of denitrification at various depths in sediments known to be affected by submarine discharge of groundwater, and also in the parent aquifer. Surface denitrification was only measured in the autumn; at 40-cm depth, where groundwater-imported nitrate has been measured, denitrification occurred consistently throughout the year, at rates from 0.14 to 2.8 ng-atom of N g⁻¹ day⁻¹. Denitrification consistently occurred below the zone of sulfate reduction and was sometimes comparable to it in magnitude. Denitrification occurred deep (14 to 40 cm) in the sediments along 30 km of shoreline, with highest rates occurring where groundwater input was greatest. Denitrification rates decreased with distance offshore, as does groundwater influx. Added glucose greatly stimulated denitrification at depth, but added nitrate did not. High rates of denitrification were measured in the aquifer (17 ng-atom of N g⁻¹ day⁻¹), and added nitrate did stimulate denitrification there. The denitrification measured was enough to remove 46% of the nitrate decrease observed between 40- and 14-cm depth in the sediment.