RNA polymerase II acts as an RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase to extend and destabilize a non‐coding RNA

RNA polymerase II (Pol II) is a well‐characterized DNA‐dependent RNA polymerase, which has also been reported to have RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) activity. Natural cellular RNA substrates of mammalian Pol II, however, have not been identified and the cellular function of the Pol II RdRP activity is unknown. We found that Pol II can use a non‐coding RNA, B2 RNA, as both a substrate and a template for its RdRP activity. Pol II extends B2 RNA by 18 nt on its 3′‐end in an internally templated reaction. The RNA product resulting from extension of B2 RNA by the Pol II RdRP can be removed from Pol II by a factor present in nuclear extracts. Treatment of cells with α‐amanitin or actinomycin D revealed that extension of B2 RNA by Pol II destabilizes the RNA. Our studies provide compelling evidence that mammalian Pol II acts as an RdRP to control the stability of a cellular RNA by extending its 3′‐end.     

Small non‐coding RNA and colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignance. Although great efforts have been made to understand the pathogenesis of CRC, the underlying mechanisms are still unclear. It is now clear that more than 90% of the total genome is actively transcribed, but lack of protein‐coding potential. The massive amount of RNA can be classified as housekeeping RNAs (such as ribosomal RNAs, transfer RNAs) and regulatory RNAs (such as microRNAs [miRNAs], PIWI‐interacting RNA [piRNAs], tRNA‐derived stress‐induced RNA, tRNA‐derived small RNA [tRFs] and long non‐coding RNAs [lncRNAs]). Small non‐coding RNAs are a group of ncRNAs with the length no more than 200 nt and they have been found to exert important regulatory functions under many pathological conditions. In this review, we summarize the biogenesis and functions of regulatory sncRNAs, such as miRNAs, piRNA and tRFs, and highlight their involvements in cancers, particularly in CRC.     

4‐O‐methylhonokiol protects against diabetic cardiomyopathy in type 2 diabetic mice by activation of AMPK‐mediated cardiac lipid metabolism improvement

Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) is characterized by increased left ventricular mass and wall thickness, decreased systolic function, reduced ejection fraction (EF) and ultimately heart failure. The 4‐O‐methylhonokiol (MH) has been isolated mainly from the bark of the root and stem of Magnolia species. In this study, we aimed to elucidate whether MH can effectively prevent DCM in type 2 diabetic (T2D) mice and, if so, whether the protective response of MH is associated with its activation of AMPK‐mediated inhibition of lipid accumulation and inflammation. A total number of 40 mice were divided into four groups: Ctrl, Ctrl + MH, T2D, T2D + MH. Five mice from each group were sacrificed after 3‐month MH treatment. The remaining animals in each group were kept for additional 3 months without further MH treatment. In T2D mice, the typical DCM symptoms were induced as expected, reflected by decreased ejection fraction and lipotoxic effects inducing lipid accumulation, oxidative stress, inflammatory reactions, and final fibrosis. However, these typical DCM changes were significantly prevented by the MH treatment immediately or 3 months after the 3‐month MH treatment, suggesting MH‐induced cardiac protection from T2D had a memory effect. Mechanistically, MH cardiac protection from DCM may be associated with its lipid metabolism improvement by the activation of AMPK/CPT1‐mediated fatty acid oxidation. In addition, the MH treatment of DCM mice significantly improved their insulin resistance levels by activation of GSK‐3β. These results indicate that the treatment of T2D with MH effectively prevents DCM probably via AMPK‐dependent improvement of the lipid metabolism.     

Long non‐coding RNA expressed in macrophage co‐varies with the inflammatory phenotype during macrophage development and polarization

Advances in microarray, RNA‐seq and omics techniques, thousands of long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) with unknown functions have been discovered. LncRNAs have presented a diverse perspective on gene regulation in diverse biological processes, especially in human immune response. Macrophages participate in the whole phase of immune inflammatory response. They are able to shape their phenotype and arouse extensive functional activation after receiving physiological and pathological stimuli. Emerging studies indicated that lncRNAs participated in the gene regulatory network during complex biological processes of macrophage, including macrophage‐induced inflammatory responses. Here, we reviewed the existing knowledges of lncRNAs in the processes of macrophage development and polarization, and their roles in several different inflammatory diseases. Specifically, we focused on how lncRNAs function in macrophage, which might help to discover some potential therapeutic targets and diagnostic biomarkers.