MicroRNA‐301b‐3p contributes to tumour growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma by repressing vestigial like family member 4

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are key regulators in the tumour growth and metastasis of human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Increasing evidence suggests that miR‐301b‐3p functions as a driver in various types of human cancer. However, the expression pattern of miR‐301b‐3p and its functional role as well as underlying molecular mechanism in HCC remain poorly known. Our study found that miR‐301b‐3p expression was significantly up‐regulated in HCC tissues compared to adjacent non‐tumour tissues. Clinical association analysis revealed that the high level of miR‐301b‐3p closely correlated with large tumour size and advanced tumour‐node‐metastasis stages. Importantly, the high miR‐301b‐3p level predicted a prominent poorer overall survival of HCC patients. Knockdown of miR‐301b‐3p suppressed cell proliferation, led to cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase and induced apoptosis of Huh7 and Hep3B cells. Furthermore, miR‐301b‐3p knockdown suppressed tumour growth of HCC in mice. Mechanistically, miR‐301b‐3p directly bond to 3′UTR of vestigial like family member 4 (VGLL4) and negatively regulated its expression. The expression of VGLL4 mRNA was down‐regulated and inversely correlated with miR‐301b‐3p level in HCC tissues. Notably, VGLL4 knockdown markedly repressed cell proliferation, resulted in G2/M phase arrest and promoted apoptosis of HCC cells. Accordingly, VGLL4 silencing rescued miR‐301b‐3p knockdown attenuated HCC cell proliferation, cell cycle progression and apoptosis resistance. Collectively, our results suggest that miR‐301b‐3p is highly expressed in HCC. miR‐301b‐3p facilitates cell proliferation, promotes cell cycle progression and inhibits apoptosis of HCC cells by repressing VGLL4.     

LINC01303 functions as a competing endogenous RNA to regulate EZH2 expression by sponging miR‐101‐3p in gastric cancer

Long non‐coding RNA (lncRNA) is one of the important regulators of many malignancies. However, the biological function and clinical significance of a large number of lncRNAs in gastric cancer remain unclear. Therefore, we analysed the TCGA data to find that LINC01303 is significantly up‐regulated in gastric cancer tissues. However, the biological function of LINC01303 in GC remains unknown. In our study, we found that the expression of LINC01303 was significantly higher in GC tissues than in adjacent tissues by real‐time quantitative PCR. We can significantly inhibit the malignant proliferation, migration and invasion of GC cells by silencing LINC01303 expression. In addition, LINC01303 knockdown can also inhibit GC growth in vivo. After the bioinformatics analysis, we found that LINC01303 can be used as a miR‐101‐3p sponge to competitively adsorb miR‐101‐3p with EZH2. Therefore, our results indicate that LINC01303 promotes the expression of EZH2 by inhibiting miR‐101‐3p activity and promotes GC progression. In summary, in this study, we demonstrated for the first time that the LINC01303/miR‐101‐3p/EZH2 axis promotes GC progression.     

Long non‐coding RNA NNT‐AS1 sponges miR‐424/E2F1 to promote the tumorigenesis and cell cycle progression of gastric cancer

Long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been illustrated to function as important regulators in carcinogenesis and cancer progression. However, the roles of lncRNA NNT‐AS1 in gastric cancer remain unclear. In the present study, we investigate the biological role of NNT‐AS1 in gastric cancer tumorigenesis. Results revealed that NNT‐AS1 expression level was significantly up‐regulated in GC tissue and cell lines compared with adjacent normal tissue and normal cell lines. The ectopic overexpression of NNT‐AS1 indicated the poor prognosis of GC patients. In vitro experiments validated that NNT‐AS1 knockdown suppressed the proliferation and invasion ability and induced the GC cell cycle progression arrest at G0/G1 phase. In vivo xenograft assay, NNT‐AS1 silencing decreased the tumour growth of GC cells. Bioinformatics online program predicted that miR‐424 targeted the 3′‐UTR of NNT‐AS1. Luciferase reporter assay, RNA‐immunoprecipitation (RIP) and RNA pull‐down assay validated the molecular binding within NNT‐AS1 and miR‐424, therefore jointly forming the RNA‐induced silencing complex (RISC). Moreover, E2F1 was verified to act as the target gene of NNT‐AS1/miR‐424, indicating the NNT‐AS1/miR‐424/E2F1 axis. In conclusion, our study indicates that NNT‐AS1 sponges miR‐424/E2F1 to facilitate GC tumorigenesis and cycle progress, revealing the oncogenic role of NNT‐AS1 for GC.     

MiR‐149 sensitizes esophageal cancer cell lines to cisplatin by targeting DNA polymerase β

Human DNA polymerase β (polβ) is a small, monomeric protein essential for short‐patch base excision repair (BER). polβ plays an important role in the regulation of chemotherapy sensitivity in tumour cells. In this study, we determined that the expression levels of polβ mRNA and miR‐149 in tumour tissues were significantly higher than in adjacent non‐tumour tissues. We also found that the expression level of miR‐149 in EC tumour tissues was inverse to that of polβ expression. Bioinformatics analysis and dual‐luciferase reporter assay predicted that miR‐149 negatively regulates polβ expression by directly binding to its 3′UTR. CCK‐8 assay indicated that miR‐149 could enhance the anti‐proliferative effects of cisplatin in EC1 and EC9706 cell lines. Flow cytometry, caspase 3/7 activity, and immunofluorescence microscopy results indicated that miR‐149 could enhance the apoptotic effects of cisplatin in EC1 and EC9706 cell lines. We also showed that the expression of polβ lacking the 3′UTR sequence could override the proliferative and apoptotic functions of miR‐149, suggesting that miR‐149 negatively regulates polβ expression by binding to its 3′UTR. Surface plasmon resonance results also showed that miR‐149 could bind with wild‐type polβ. In addition, we identified a new variant of polβ (C1134G). In conclusion, this study confirms that miR‐149 may enhance the sensitivity of EC cell lines to cisplatin by targeting polβ, and that miR‐149 may be unable to regulate the C1134G variant of polβ. Based on these findings, potential drugs could be developed with a focus on enhanced sensitivity of EC patients to chemotherapy.     

LINC01436, regulating miR‐585 and FBXO11, is an oncogenic lncRNA in the progression of gastric cancer

Accumulating studies have indicated that long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are crucial modulators in cancer biology. In this work, we investigated the function and related mechanisms of LINC01436 in the progression of gastric cancer (GC). We demonstrated that LINC01436 was significantly up‐regulated in cancerous tissues of GC samples, and its overexpression was correlated with a worse prognosis for the patients. In the GC cell line BGC823 cells, LINC01436 knockdown repressed the proliferation and metastasis of cancer cells; conversely, in GC cell line AGS cells, overexpression of LINC01436 showed the opposite effects. We then demonstrated that miR‐585, a tumor suppressor, could bind to both LINC01436 and the 3′‐UTR of F‐box protein 11 (FBOX11), and LINC01436 was proved to sponge miR‐585 and repress it, and indirectly promoted the expression of FBOX11. Collectively, these results suggested that LINC01436 was an oncogenic lncRNA in GC and promoted proliferation and metastasis of GC cell via regulating miR‐585 and FBOX11.     

MicroRNA-494 suppresses cell proliferation and induces senescence in A549 lung cancer cells

Objectives: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small functional RNAs that regulate mRNAs for degradation or translational suppression. In the present study, we aimed to reveal functional importance of miRNA‐494 (miR‐494) in A549 human lung cancer cells. Materials and methods: We established A549 cells that constitutively expressed miR‐494. Next, we sought to investigate insulin‐like growth factor 2 mRNA‐binding protein 1 (IGF2BP1) mRNA as an miR‐494 target. For this, we constructed a reporter plasmid bearing potential miR‐494 binding sequences derived from the 3′‐untranslated region (3′‐UTR) of IGF2BP1 mRNA in the 3′‐UTR of the luciferase gene. Results: Through comparison between miR‐494 expressing cells and control cells, we revealed that miR‐494 suppressed cell proliferation and colony forming activity, and induced senescence. Reporter activity was inhibited by miR‐494. In addition, IGF2BP1 mRNA levels were down‐regulated in A549 cells that constitutively expressed miR‐494. IGF2BP1 has been shown to bind and suppress IGF2 mRNA, and this could be a reason why IGF2BP1 can regulate cell function. Therefore, we analysed IGF2 mRNA levels and revealed that IGF2 was up‐regulated in A549 cells that constitutively expressed miR‐494. Finally, elevated IGF2 mRNA levels in A549 cells that constitutively expressed miR‐494 were suppressed to basal level by an miR‐494 inhibitor. Conclusions: Taken together, IGF2BP1 and its downstream target IGF2 could be a crucial axis for miR‐494 in regulation of the destiny of A549 cells.     

Loss of PPM1F expression predicts tumour recurrence and is negatively regulated by miR‐590‐3p in gastric cancer

Objectives

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) as small non‐coding RNA molecules act by negatively regulating their target genes. Recent studies have shown that protein phosphatase Mg2+/Mn2+‐dependent 1F (PPM1F) plays a critical role in cancer metastasis. But, the regulation mechanisms of PPM1F by miRNAs in gastric cancer (GC) remain undefined.

Methods

The correlation of PPM1F or miR‐590‐3p (miR‐590) expression with clinicopathological features and prognosis of the patients with GC was analysed by TCGA RNA‐sequencing data. The miRNAs that target PPM1F gene were identified by bioinformatics and Spearman correlation analysis, and the binding site between miR‐590 and PPM1F 3′UTR was confirmed by dual luciferase assay. MTT and Transwell assays were conducted to evaluate the effects of miR‐590 or (and) PPM1F on cell proliferation and invasion.

Results

We found that PPM1F expression was downregulated in GC tissues and cell lines and was correlated with tumour recurrence in patients with GC. The decreased expression of PPM1F was attributed to the dysregulation of miR‐590 expression rather than its genetic or epigenetic alterations. Overexpression of miR‐590 promoted cell proliferation and invasion capability of GC cells, while knockdown of miR‐590 reversed these effects. Moreover, PPM1F was validated as a direct target of miR‐590 and counteracted the tumour‐promoting effects caused by miR‐590. The expression of miR‐590 presented the negative correlation with PPM1F expression and acted as an independent prognostic factor for tumour recurrence in patients with GC.

Conclusion

PPM1F may function as a suppressive factor and is negatively regulated by miR‐590 in GC.

     

YAP-TEAD up-regulates IRS2 expression to induce and deteriorate oesophageal cancer

Oesophageal cancer (EC) represents a significant cause of cancer worldwide. Yes-associated protein (YAP) is reported to correlate with the initiation of multiple cancers including EC, but the underlying mechanism remains elusive. The current study aimed to investigate the molecular mechanism of YAP-TEAD in the occurrence and progression of EC. EC tissues and cells were obtained, followed by determination of the expression of YAP, c-Jun, pc-Jun and IRS2. The effect of YAP-TEAD on the biological EC cell processes was explored through gain- and loss-of-function approaches. The interaction between YAP and TEAD was detected by co-immunoprecipitation. The binding of TEAD to the c-Jun promoter was determined using chromatin immunoprecipitation. Tumour formation in the nude mice was detected in order to ascertain the effect of YAP and IRS2 in vivo. We found elevated YAP in the EC tissues and cells. YAP silencing led to a decrease in EC cell proliferation, invasion and sphere formation. YAP-TEAD complex bound to the promotor of c-Jun, and c-Jun led to an increase in the expression of IRS2 through the JNK/c-Jun pathway. Additionally, pc-Jun and phosphorylated JNK were localized in the nuclear in addition to displaying enhanced expression in the EC tissues. IRS2 overexpression negated the inhibition of cell proliferation, invasion and sphere formation triggering YAP silencing. YAP up-regulated IRS2 and aggravated EC in vivo. Taken together, YAP-TEAD activates the JNK/c-Jun pathway to up-regulate IRS2, ultimately promoting EC progression. Therefore, YAP-TEAD inhibition could be a promising therapeutic approach for EC treatment.