Highly probable active site of the sweet protein monellin.

The sweet protein monellin consists of two noncovalently associated polypeptide chains, the A chain of 44 amino acid residues and the B chain of 50 residues. Synthetic monellin is 4000 times as sweet as sucrose on a weight basis, and the native conformation is essential for the sweet taste. Knowledge of the active site of monellin will provide important information on the mode of interaction between sweeteners and their receptors. If the replacement of a certain amino acid residue in monellin removes the sweet taste, while the native conformation is retained, it may be concluded that the position replaced is the active site. Our previous replacement studies on Asp residues in the A chain did not remove the sweet taste. The B chain contains two Asp residues at positions 7 and 21, which were replaced by Asn. [AsnB21]Monellin and [AsnB7]monellin were 7000 and 20 times sweeter than sucrose, respectively. The low potency of the [AsnB7]monellin indicates that AspB7 participates in binding with the receptor. AspB7 was then replaced by Abu. [AbuB7]Monellin was devoid of sweetness, and retained the native conformation. AspB7 is located at the surface of the molecule (Ogata et al.). These results suggest that Asp7 in the B chain is the highly probable active site of monellin.     

Highly Probable Active Site of the Sweet Protein Monellin

The sweet protein monellin consists of two noncovalently associated polypeptide chains, the A chain of 44 amino acid residues and the B chain of 50 residues. Synthetic monellin is 4000 times as sweet as sucrose on a weight basis, and the native conformation is essential for the sweet taste. Knowledge of the active site of monellin will provide important information on the mode of interaction between sweeteners and their receptors. If the replacement of a certain amino acid residue in monellin removes the sweet taste, while the native conformation is retained, it may be concluded that the position replaced is the active site. Our previous replacement studies on Asp residues in the A chain did not remove the sweet taste. The B chain contains two Asp residues at positions 7 and 21, which were replaced by Asn. [Asn^B21] Monellin and [Asn^B7]monellin were 7000 and 20 times sweeter than sucrose, respectively. The low potency of the [Asn^B7]monellin indicates that ASp^B7 participates in binding with the receptor. ASp^B7 was then replaced by Abu. [Abu^B7]Monellin was devoid of sweetness, and retained the native conformation. ASp^B7 is located at the surface of the molecule (Ogata et al.). These results suggest that Asp⁷ in the B chain is the highly probable active site of monellin.     

Conformational changes of the sweet protein monellin as measured by fluorescence emission

Monellin is a protein that tastes sweet. In the native state it is a dimer composed of two dissimilar noncovalently associated polypeptides. The conformation of the protein is a determinant of its sweetness, and the present investigation takes advantage of the fluorescence spectrum being a sensitive index of its conformation. The emission spectrum is used to evaluate the ability of temperature and pH to alter the conformation and the sweetness of the protein. When monellin dissolved in water is heated in discrete steps from 25 to 100 degrees C, its sweetness decreases. The halfwidth of the fluorescence emission band increases in parallel with the loss of sweetness. The increase in halfwidth is due primarily to an increase in the intensity of tyrosine emission that may be the result of the two dissimilar polypeptides of monellin beginning to separate. Tyrosine residues are present in both chains, while the single tryptophan occurs in only one. Monellin is less susceptible to denaturation by increasing temperature when dissolved in sodium acetate buffer at pH 4 than it is at pH 3 or 7. When the pH of a solution containing monellin in 0.1 M KC1 is varied from 2 to 13, there is a broad pH range (pH 4 to 9) where monellin's conformation is not markedly altered. Below pH 3.5 and above pH 10.5, however, the emission spectra indicate that substantial denaturation occurs. However, monellin can be partially renatured following pH 12 treatment with only minimal loss of sweetness. The sweetness of monellin under these two types of denaturing conditions, temperature and pH, can be predicted by the fluorescence emission spectrum of the protein. In addition, this study confirms that the biological activity of monellin, its sweetness, is a function of quaternary structure of the protein.     

Effects of denaturants on the sweet-tasting protein monellin.

Effects of the denaturants urea and guanidine-HCl on the sweet-tasting protein monellin have been studied. The pH at which monellin is initially treated with denaturant is an important factor in retention of sweetness, but the pH maintained during subsequent removal of denaturant by dialysis has no effect on activity. Recovery of sweetness of denaturant-treated monellin is favored when denaturation occurs at acid pH. Monellin treated with either 6 M guanidine-HCl or 8 M urea at acid pH retains all of its sweetness following removal of denaturant, but urea treatment at neutral pH leads to some irreversible loss of sweetness. Monellin precipitates from solution under some conditions during removal of denaturant by dialysis, and the precipitated protein is no longer sweet. Precipitation is least under acid conditions. Aggregated protein was demonstrated by gel filtration chromatography. The single sulfhydryl group of monellin was not demonstrable in the precipitated protein, having apparently become oxidized during denaturation and formation of the aggregated protein. The data support the hypothesis that the tertiary structure is important in the ability of monellin to elicit a sweet sensation.     

Riboflavin-binding protein exhibits selective sweet suppression toward protein sweeteners

Riboflavin-binding protein (RBP) is well known as a riboflavin carrier protein in chicken egg and serum. A novel function of RBP was found as a sweet-suppressing protein. RBP, purified from hen egg white, suppressed the sweetness of protein sweeteners such as thaumatin, monellin, and lysozyme, whereas it did not suppress the sweetness of low molecular weight sweeteners such as sucrose, glycine, D-phenylalanine, saccharin, cyclamate, aspartame, and stevioside. Therefore, the sweet-suppressing activity of RBP was apparently selective to protein sweeteners. The sweet suppression by RBP was independent of binding of riboflavin with its molecule. Yolk RBP, with minor structural differences compared with egg white RBP, also elicited a weaker sweet suppression. However, other commercially available proteins including ovalbumin, ovomucoid, beta-lactogloblin, myoglobin, and albumin did not substantially alter the sweetness of protein sweeteners. Because a prerinse with RBP reduced the subsequent sweetness of protein sweeteners, whereas the enzymatic activity of lysozyme and the elution profile of lysozyme on gel permeation chromatography were not affected by RBP, it is suggested that the sweet suppression is caused by an interaction of RBP with a sweet taste receptor rather than with the protein sweeteners themselves. The selectivity in the sweet suppression by RBP is consistent with the existence of multiple interaction sites within a single sweet taste receptor.     

The importance of electrostatic potential in the interaction of sweet proteins with the sweet taste receptor

In addition to many small molecular mass sweeteners there are in nature a few sweet proteins. The molecular volume of sweet proteins is so different from that of common sweeteners that it was difficult to understand how molecules as large as proteins can activate a receptor designed to host small molecules. We have recently shown that sweet proteins can activate the sweet receptor by a mechanism of interaction, called 'wedge model", in which proteins fit a large cavity of the receptor with wedge-shaped surfaces of their structures. In order to substantiate this model we have designed, expressed and characterized seven mutants of MNEI, a single chain monellin. Three uncharged residues of the interaction surface, Met42, Tyr63 and Tyr65, were changed either into acidic or basic residues whereas Asp68, a key acidic residue, was changed into a basic one. As a general trend, we observe that an increase of the negative charge is much more detrimental for sweetness than an increase of positive charge. In addition we show that by a careful choice of a residue at the center of the interface between MNEI and receptor, it is possible even to increase the sweetness of MNEI. These results are fully consistent with the wedge model.     

Probing the sweet determinants of brazzein: wild-type brazzein and a tasteless variant, brazzein-ins(R18a-I18b), exhibit different pH-dependent NMR chemical shifts

Brazzein is a small, intensely sweet protein. As a probe of the functional properties of its solvent-exposed loop, two residues (Arg-Ile) were inserted between Leu18 and Ala19 of brazzein. Psychophysical testing demonstrated that this mutant is totally tasteless. NMR chemical shift mapping of differences between this mutant and brazzein indicated that residues affected by the insertion are localized to the mutated loop, the region of the single alpha-helix, and around the Cys16-Cys37 disulfide bond. Residues unaffected by this mutation included those near the C-terminus and in the loop connecting the alpha-helix and the second beta-strand. In particular, several residues of brazzein previously shown to be essential for its sweetness (His31, Arg33, Glu41, Arg43, Asp50, and Tyr54) exhibited negligible chemical shift changes. Moreover, the pH dependence of the chemical shifts of His31, Glu41, Asp50, and Tyr54 were unaltered by the insertion. The insertion led to large chemical shift and pKa perturbation of Glu36, a residue shown previously to be important for brazzein's sweetness. These results serve to refine the known sweetness determinants of brazzein and lend further support to the idea that the protein interacts with a sweet-taste receptor through a multi-site interaction mechanism, as has been postulated for brazzein and other sweet proteins (monellin and thaumatin).     

Solution structure, backbone dynamics, and stability of a double mutant single-chain monellin. structural origin of sweetness

Single-chain monellin (SCM), which is an engineered 94-residue polypeptide, has been characterized as being as sweet as native two-chain monellin. Data from gel-filtration high performance liquid chromatography and NMR has proven that SCM exists as a monomer in aqueous solution. In order to determine the structural origin of the taste of sweetness, we engineered several mutant SCM proteins by mutating Glu(2), Asp(7), and Arg(39) residues, which are responsible for sweetness. In this study, we present the solution structure, backbone dynamics, and stability of mutant SCM proteins using circular dichroism, fluorescence, and NMR spectroscopy. Based on the NMR data, a stable alpha-helix and five-stranded antiparallel beta-sheet were identified for double mutant SCM. Strands beta1 and beta2 are connected by a small bulge, and the disruption of the first beta-strand were observed with SCM(DR) comprising residues of Ile(38)-Cys(41). The dynamical and folding characteristics from circular dichroism, fluorescence, and backbone dynamics studies revealed that both wild type and mutant proteins showed distinct dynamical as well as stability differences, suggesting the important role of mutated residues in the sweet taste of SCM. Our results will provide an insight into the structural origin of sweet taste as well as the mutational effect in the stability of the engineered sweet protein SCM.     

Monkey electrophysiological and human psychophysical responses to mutants of the sweet protein brazzein: delineating brazzein sweetness

Responses to brazzein, 25 brazzein mutants and two forms of monellin were studied in two types of experiments: electrophysiological recordings from chorda tympani S fibers of the rhesus monkey, Macaca mulatta, and psychophysical experiments. We found that different mutations at position 29 (changing Asp29 to Ala, Lys or Asn) made the molecule significantly sweeter than brazzein, while mutations at positions 30 or 33 (Lys30Asp or Arg33Ala) removed all sweetness. The same pattern occurred again at the beta-turn region, where Glu41Lys gave the highest sweetness score among the mutants tested, whereas a mutation two residues distant (Arg43Ala) abolished the sweetness. The effects of charge and side chain size were examined at two locations, namely positions 29 and 36. The findings indicate that charge is important for eliciting sweetness, whereas the length of the side-chain plays a lesser role. We also found that the N- and C-termini are important for the sweetness of brazzein. The close correlation (r = 0.78) between the results of the above two methods corroborates our hypothesis that S fibers convey sweet taste in primates.     

Redesigning a sweet protein: increased stability and renaturability

Monellin is one of two natural proteins from African berries with potent sweet taste. Monellin is the smaller of the two, and consists of two peptides. The protein loses sweetness when heated above 50 degrees C under acidic pH. Based on the crystal structure of monellin we have fused the two chains into a single chain using several different linkers copied and 'transplanted' from the same molecule. One of the newly designed proteins is as potently sweet as the natural one, is more stable upon temperature or pH changes, and renatures easily even after heating to 100 degrees C at low pH.     

The cysteine-rich region of T1R3 determines responses to intensely sweet proteins

A wide variety of chemically diverse compounds taste sweet, including natural sugars such as glucose, fructose, sucrose, and sugar alcohols, small molecule artificial sweeteners such as saccharin and acesulfame K, and proteins such as monellin and thaumatin. Brazzein, like monellin and thaumatin, is a naturally occurring plant protein that humans, apes, and Old World monkeys perceive as tasting sweet but that is not perceived as sweet by other species including New World monkeys, mouse, and rat. It has been shown that heterologous expression of T1R2 plus T1R3 together yields a receptor responsive to many of the above-mentioned sweet tasting ligands. We have determined that the molecular basis for species-specific sensitivity to brazzein sweetness depends on a site within the cysteine-rich region of human T1R3. Other mutations in this region of T1R3 affected receptor activity toward monellin, and in some cases, overall efficacy to multiple sweet compounds, implicating this region as a previously unrecognized important determinant of sweet receptor function.     

Enzymatic ligation for synthesis of single‐chain analogue of monellin by transglutaminase*

Monellin, a sweet protein, consists of two noncovalently associated polypeptide chains: an A chain of 44 amino acid residues and a B chain of 50 residues. Microbial transglutaminase (MTGase) was used for ligation of the monellin subunits without any protecting groups, and without activation of the C^α‐carboxyl group at the C‐terminus. Since a peptide fragment LLQG is a good substrate for MTGase to form an amide bond between the γ‐amide group of the Gln residue and the ε‐amino group of Lys, a monellin B chain analogue in which LLQG was elongated at the C‐terminus (B‐LLQG) was synthesized by solid‐phase synthesis. The monellin A chain analogue in which KGK was elongated at the N‐terminus (KGK‐A) was synthesized by the same method as that of the B chain analogue. The KGK‐A chain and the B‐LLQG chain were coupled by MTGase to give single‐chain analogue of monellin. The single‐chain analogue of monellin was characterized by analytical reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography, electrospray ionization, and amino acid analyses. All analyses gave satisfactory results. The single‐chain analogue of monellin was more heat stable than natural monellin. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biopoly 50: 193–200, 1999     

Reduced sweetness of a monellin (MNEI) mutant results from increased protein flexibility and disruption of a distant poly-(L-proline) II helix

Monellin is a highly potent sweet-tasting protein but relatively little is known about how it interacts with the sweet taste receptor. We determined X-ray crystal structures of 3 single-chain monellin (MNEI) proteins with alterations at 2 core residues (G16A, V37A, and G16A/V37A) that induce 2- to 10-fold reductions in sweetness relative to the wild-type protein. Surprisingly, no changes were observed in the global protein fold or the positions of surface amino acids important for MNEI sweetness that could explain these differences in protein activity. Differential scanning calorimetry showed that while the thermal stability of each mutant MNEI was reduced, the least sweet mutant, G16A-MNEI, was not the least stable protein. In contrast, solution spectroscopic measurements revealed that changes in protein flexibility and the C-terminal structure correlate directly with protein activity. G16A mutation-induced disorder in the protein core is propagated via changes to hydrophobic interactions that disrupt the formation and/or position of a critical C-terminal poly-(L-proline) II helix. These findings suggest that MNEI interaction with the sweet taste receptor is highly sensitive to the relative positions of key residues across its protein surface and that loss of sweetness in G16A-MNEI may result from an increased entropic cost of binding.     

Identification of novel sweet protein for nutritional applications

The prevalence of obesity and diabetes has increased exponentially in recent years around the globe, especially in India. Sweet proteins have the potential to substitute the sugars, by acting as natural, good and low calorie sweeteners. They also do not trigger a demand for insulin in diabetic patients unlike sucrose. In humans, the sweet taste perception is mainly due to taste-specific G protein-coupled heterodimeric receptors T1R2-T1R3. These receptors recognize diverse natural and synthetic sweeteners such as monelin, brazzein, thaumatin, curculin, mabinlin, miraculin and pentadin. Structural modeling of new sweetener proteins will be a great leap in further advancement of knowledge and their utility as sweeteners. We have explored the fingerprints of sweetness by studying the aminoacid composition and structure properties of the above proteins. The structural analysis of monellin revealed that the individual A or B chains of monellin are not contributing to its sweetness. However, the native conformation and ionic interaction between AspB7 of monellin with active site of T1R2-T1R3 receptor, along with hydrogen bonding stability of IleB6 and IleB8 are responsible for the sweet taste. Based on structural similarity search, we found a new hypothetical protein from Shewanella loihica, which has the presence of Asp(32) with adjacent isoleucine residues. Further, we examined the lead protein by two-step docking for the study of interaction of functionally conserved residues with receptors. The identified protein showed similar ionic and hydrophobic interactions with monelin. This gives a promising opportunity to explore this protein for potential health application in the low calorie sweetener industry viz., soft drinks, snacks, food, chocolate industries etc.     

The mechanism of interaction of sweet proteins with the T1R2-T1R3 receptor: evidence from the solution structure of G16A-MNEI

The mechanism by which sweet proteins elicit a response on the T1R2-T1R3 sweet taste receptor is still mostly unknown but has been so far related to the presence of "sweet fingers" on the protein surface able to interact with the same mechanism as that of low molecular mass sweeteners. In the search for the identification of sweet fingers, we have solved the solution structure of G16A MNEI, a structural mutant that shows a reduction of one order of magnitude in sweetness with respect to its parent protein, MNEI, a single-chain monellin. Comparison of the structures of wild-type monellin and its G16A mutant shows that the mutation does not affect the structure of potential glucophores but produces a distortion of the surface owing to the partial relative displacement of elements of secondary structure. These results show conclusively that sweet proteins do not possess a sweet finger and strongly support the hypothesis that the mechanism of interaction of sweet-tasting proteins with the recently identified T1R2-T1R3 GPC receptor is different from that of low molecular mass sweeteners.     

Solid-phase synthesis of [AsnA16]-, [AsnA22]-, [GlnA25]-, and [AsnA26]monellin, analogues of the sweet protein monellin.

In an attempt to delineate the binding site(s) of monellin to the receptor by means of a structure-taste relationship, we synthesized four monellin analogues, [AsnA16]-, [AsnA22]-, [GlnA25]-, and [AsnA26]-monellin, which were 7500, 750, 2500, and 5500 times as sweet as sucrose on a weight basis, respectively. Among them, [AsnA22]monellin and [GlnA25]monellin were less sweet than monellin, and were susceptible to the HPLC conditions used. It can be concluded that Asp16, Asp22, Glu25, and Asp26 residues of the A chain did not participate in binding with the receptor, since the sweet taste was not removed by replacing the amino acid residues with Asn or Gln. It can also be concluded that Asp22 and Glu25 of the A chain may have participated in intramolecular binding, as was pointed out by Kim et al., since exchanging Asp22 and Glu25 of the A chain with Asn and Gln significantly decreased the stability in solution.     

Stable expression of the sweet protein monellin variant MNEI in tobacco chloroplasts

Monellin is a naturally sweet protein that consists of two polypeptide chains and has potential uses as a highly potent non-carbohydrate sweetener. We aimed to make this protein more usable by increasing its stability and expressing it in a high-yielding system. MNEI is a modified version of the protein that consists of the two natural chains of monellin joined via a dipeptide linkage. In the thermostability analysis of MNEI variants, four mutated MNEIs, MNEI-E24L, MNEI-E24F, MNEI-E24W, and MNEI-E24A, had higher melting temperatures than wild-type MNEI and retained their sweet flavor even at temperatures above 70?°C. Our findings indicate that the increased stability of monellin allows it to retain its strong sweetness even under extreme conditions. We successfully overexpressed the thermostable MNEI mutants in tobacco chloroplasts. Here, we report that the MNEI mutants showed enhanced thermostability, and the stable forms of MNEI can be produced through plastid transformation in tobacco.     

Purification and complete amino acid sequence of a new type of sweet protein taste-modifying activity, curculin

A new taste-modifying protein named curculin was extracted with 0.5 M NaCl from the fruits of Curculigo latifolia and purified by ammonium sulfate fractionation, CM-Sepharose ion-exchange chromatography, and gel filtration. Purified curculin thus obtained gave a single band having a Mr of 12,000 on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the presence of 8 M urea. The molecular weight determined by low-angle laser light scattering was 27,800. These results suggest that native curculin is a dimer of a 12,000-Da polypeptide. The complete amino acid sequence of curculin was determined by automatic Edman degradation. Curculin consists of 114 residues. Curculin itself elicits a sweet taste. After curculin, water elicits a sweet taste, and sour substances induce a stronger sense of sweetness. No protein with both sweet-tasting and taste-modifying activities has ever been found. There are five sets of tripeptides common to miraculin (a taste-modifying protein), six sets of tripeptides common to thaumatin (a sweet protein), and two sets of tripeptides common to monellin (a sweet protein). Anti-miraculin serum was not immunologically reactive with curculin. The mechanism of the taste-modifying action of curculin is discussed.     

Cloning, expression and characterization of recombinant sweet-protein thaumatin II using the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris

Thaumatin, an intensely sweet-tasting protein, was secreted by the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. The mature thaumatin II gene was directly cloned from Taq polymerase-amplified PCR products by using TA cloning methods and fused the pPIC9K expression vector that contains Saccharomyces cerevisiae prepro alpha-mating factor secretion signal. Several additional amino acid residues were introduced at both the N- and C-terminal ends by genetic modification to investigate the role of the terminal end region for elicitation of sweetness in the thaumatin molecule. The secondary and tertiary structures of purified recombinant thaumatin were almost identical to those of the plant thaumatin molecule. Recombinant thaumatin II elicited a sweet taste as native plant thaumatin II; its threshold value of sweetness to humans was around 50 nM, which is the same as that of plant thaumatin II. These results demonstrate that the functional expression of thaumatin II was attained by Pichia pastoris systems and that the N- and C-terminal regions of the thaumatin II molecule do not -play an important role in eliciting the sweet taste of thaumatin.     

Intra- versus intermolecular interactions in monellin: contribution of surface charges to protein assembly

The relative significance of weak non-covalent interactions in biological context has been much debated. Here, we have addressed the contribution of Coulombic interactions to protein stability and assembly experimentally. The sweet protein monellin, a non-covalently linked heterodimeric protein, was chosen for this study because of its ability to spontaneously reconstitute from separated fragments. The reconstitution of monellin mutants containing large surface charge perturbations was compared to the thermostability of structurally equivalent single-chain monellin containing the same sets of mutations under varying salt concentrations. The affinity between monellin fragments is found to correlate with the thermostability of single chain monellin, indicating the involvement of the same underlying Coulombic interactions. This confirms that there are no principal differences in the interactions involved in folding and binding. Based on comparison with a previous mutational study involving hydrophobic core residues, the relative contribution of Coulombic interactions to stability and affinity is modest. However, the Coulombic perturbations only affect the association rates of reconstitution in contrast to perturbations involving hydrophobic residues, which affect primarily the dissociation rates. These results indicate that Coulombic interactions are likely to be of main importance for the association of protein assembly, relevant for functions of proteins.