The cell cycle dependence of thermotolerance. II. CHO cells heated at 45.0 degrees C

This report extends our investigations of the cell cycle dependence of the expression of thermotolerance to include tolerance expressed by Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells exposed to 45.0 degrees C hyperthermia. We examined the response of asynchronous cells following exposure at 45.0 degrees C. A maximum in thermotolerance under these conditions was reached approximately 12 hr after a 15-min exposure to 45.0 degrees C hyperthermia and progressively decreased thereafter. Cells were delayed in S and G2 phase for 24 hr, after which time cell growth resumed. We then characterized the response of CHO cell populations synchronized in G1 or early or late S phase. We observed that the expression of tolerance depended on the position of cells in the cell cycle and was modulated by changes in the sensitivity of cells as they progressed through the cell cycle subsequent to the tolerance induction dose. We measured the variation in the sensitivity of these cells to 45.0 degrees C hyperthermia throughout the cell cycle and found substantial changes as cells progressed through S phase. Cells in early S phase were the most sensitive to heat at this temperature, and as these cells progressed through S phase, they became progressively more resistant. In addition, G1 cells were delayed for approximately 15 to 18 hr by a 15-min, 45.0 degrees C heat pulse, whereas S-phase cells were delayed to a lesser extent. The data presented in this report suggest that the induction of thermotolerance is relatively non-cell-cycle specific, but the magnitude of expression of tolerance depends on the position of cells in the cell cycle at the time of the subsequent challenge heat dose.     

The cell cycle dependence of thermotolerance. III. HeLa cells heated at 45.0 degrees C

We have extended our studies on the cell cycle dependence of thermotolerance to include HeLa cells heated at 45.0 degrees C to compare the results to Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. We found that asynchronous HeLa cells were more resistant to heat than CHO cells but showed a similar development and decay of thermotolerance. Flow cytometry (FCM) was used to study redistributions in the cell cycle after an initial heat dose. Cells heated for 35 min at 45.0 degrees C were delayed in G1 by about 7 h compared to controls, with delays in late S and G2/M phase also. The heat sensitivity varied through the cell cycle; G1 cells were the most resistant to heat, while S-phase cells were uniformly sensitive throughout S phase, and G2 cells were resistant. Thermotolerance could be induced and expressed in early or late S-phase cells, but to a lesser extent than for G1 cells. The results were similar in many respects to CHO cells, but there were significant differences.     

Relationship between thermal tolerance and protein degradation in temperature-sensitive mouse cells.

The induction of thermotolerance was studied in a temperature sensitive mouse cell line, ts85, and results were compared with those for the wild-type FM3A cells. At the nonpermissive temperature of 39 degrees C, ts85 cells are defective in the degradation of short-lived abnormal proteins, apparently because of loss of activity of a ubiquitin-activating enzyme. The failure of the ts85 cells to develop thermotolerance to 41-43 degrees C after incubation at the nonpermissive temperature of 39 degrees C correlated with the failure of the cells to degrade short-lived abnormal proteins at 39 degrees C. However, the failure of the ts85 cells to develop thermotolerance to 43 degrees C during incubation at 33 degrees C after either arsenite treatment or heating at 45.5 degrees C for 6 or 10 min did not correlate with protein degradation rates. Although the rate of degrading abnormal protein was reduced after heating at 45.5 degrees C for 10 min, the rates were normal after arsenite treatment or heating at 45.5 degrees C for 6 min. In addition, when protein synthesis was inhibited with cycloheximide both during incubation at 33 degrees C or 39 degrees C and during heating at 41-43 degrees C, resistance to heating was observed, but protein degradation rates at 39 degrees C or 43 degrees C were not altered by the cycloheximide treatment. Therefore, there is apparently no consistent relationship between rates of degrading abnormal proteins and the ability of cells to develop thermotolerance and resistance to heating in the presence of cycloheximide.     

The effect of 45 degrees C hyperthermia on the membrane fluidity of cells of several lines.

The membrane fluidity of cells of human (AG1522 human foreskin fibroblasts), rodent [Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) and radiation-induced mouse fibrosarcoma], and feline (Crandall feline kidney) cell lines after heating at 45 degrees C was measured by flow cytometry. In addition, a heat-resistant variant of radiation-induced mouse fibrosarcoma cells and two heat-sensitive CHO strains were studied. Fluorescence polarization of the plasma membrane probe trimethylammonium-diphenylhexatriene was used as a measure of membrane fluidity. The sensitivity of all cell lines to 45 degrees C hyperthermia was compared. The baseline membrane fluidity varied among the cell lines, but did not correlate with sensitivity to hyperthermia. However, CHO cells, especially the heat-sensitive mutants, had the largest increase in membrane fluidity after heating at 45 degrees C, while the heat-resistant mouse fibrosarcoma variants and Crandall feline kidney cells resisted changes in fluidity. In general, the more resistant the cell line was to killing by heat, the more resistant it was to changes in membrane fluidity.     

Inhibition of heat shock protein synthesis and thermotolerance by cycloheximide

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were exposed to a 43 degrees C, 15-min heat shock to study the relationship between protein synthesis and the development of thermotolerance. The 43 degrees C heat shock triggered the synthesis of three protein families having molecular weights of 110,000, 90,000, and 65,000 (HSP). These proteins were synthesized at 37 and 46 degrees C. This heat shock also induced the development of thermotolerance, which was measured by incubating the cells at 46 degrees C 4 h after the 43 degrees C heat treatment. CHO cells were also exposed to 20 micrograms/ml of cycloheximide for 30 min at 37 degrees C, 15 min at 43 degrees C, and 4 h at 37 degrees C. This treatment inhibited the enhanced synthesis of the Mr 110,000, 90,000, and 65,000 proteins. The cycloheximide was then washed out and the cells were incubated at 46 degrees C. HSP synthesis did not recover during the 46 degrees C incubation. This cycloheximide treatment also partially inhibited the development of thermotolerance. These results suggest that for CHO cells to express thermotolerance when exposed to the supralethal temperature of 46 degrees C protein synthesis is necessary.     

Influence of temperature on the development and decay of thermotolerance and heat shock proteins

The development of thermotolerance and its decay in plateau-phase Chinese hamster cells are shown to be temperature-dependent phenomena. Development of tolerance, after an initial dose of 10 min at 45 degrees C, is appreciably slower between 20 and 28 degrees C than it is at 37 degrees C. Decay of tolerance is also slower in that temperature range; at 4-23 degrees C, it does not decay at all during the 96-h interval of the experiment. At 41 degrees C, thermotolerance decay, "step-down" cell killing, and thermotolerance induction apparently all occur and affect cell survival. The decay of HSP 70 mirrors that of thermotolerance, except at 41 degrees C. At that temperature very likely de novo synthesis of that protein becomes important in determining protein concentration. Our data show that care must be taken when extrapolating from kinetic data obtained with surface tissues in vivo to those in depth. The former are usually at a temperature between 25 and 32 degrees C; the latter are at 37 degrees C.     

Temperature-dependent induction of thermotolerance by ethanol

Ethanol (1 M) cytotoxicity in asynchronous Chinese hamster ovary cells was strongly temperature dependent, yielding families of cell survival curves between 34 and 39 degrees C that were similar to those obtained at hyperthermic temperatures in medium without ethanol. Below 36 degrees C, survival curves were biphasic, indicating the development of thermotolerance during ethanol exposures. At room temperature (22 degrees C) ethanol was completely nontoxic with incubation periods up to 6 h. A comparison of survival curves with and without ethanol showed that the major effect of ethanol was an effective temperature shift of circa 6.5 degrees C, i.e., the cell survival curve at 37 degrees C in 1 M ethanol was equivalent to that at 43.6 degrees C in medium without ethanol. In addition to the effective temperature shift, ethanol also resulted in sensitization to "heat" with a temperature dependence that was similar to the stepdown heating effect. When thermotolerance was induced with acute ethanol exposures (25 min, 37 degrees C or 60 min, 35.5 degrees C), the kinetics and the magnitude of tolerance were similar to those after isotoxic conditioning treatments with heat alone (10 min, 45 degrees C). In contrast, equimolar ethanol at 22 degrees C did not induce thermotolerance. These data provide a rationale for conflicting results in the literature regarding thermotolerance induction by ethanol. Both heat sensitization and the induction of thermotolerance are interpreted as the effect of ethanol on the solution properties of intracellular water. These solvent alterations reduce the temperature necessary to elicit cytotoxicity and the development of thermotolerance.     

Isolation of a temperature-sensitive variant Chinese hamster ovary cell line with a morphologically altered endocytic recycling compartment

We have enriched a mutagenized population of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells for those defective in endocytosis by selection for survival to treatment with transferrin (Tf)-ricin and Tf-diphtheria toxin conjugates. Surviving cells were screened with a fluorescently labeled Tf uptake assay to identify cells with mor-phologically aberrant endocytic phenotypes. One of the cell lines identified, B104-5, has a striking temperature-induced alteration in the morphology of its endocytic receptor recycling compartment. In parental cells the tightly clustered endocytic recycling compartment is located near the Golgi complex. In the mutant cells, following incubation at 40°C, this compartment appears fragmented and widely dispersed. Surprisingly, this alteration in the morphology of the recycling compartment has no effect on the kinetics of Tf internationalization and recycling. The wild-type endocytic compartment is closely aligned with the microtubule-organizing center and the Golgi apparatus, and like the Golgi, its clustered appearance is dependent upon intact microtubules. Although the disruption of the B104-5 receptor recycling compartment morphology can be phenocopied in wild-type cells by microtubule depolymerizing drugs, the microtubule cytoskeleton in B104-5 cells appears normal in immunofluorescent staining. B104-5 cells, unlike the parental cells, do not proliferate at 40°C. The mutation in B104-5 cells is recessive, as fusion with wild-type cells results in a reversion of the B104-5 phenotype. The finding that the morphology of the recycling compartment in CHO cells can be altered without affecting recycling of endocytosed Tf is consistent with the variety of recycling compartment morphologies observed among different cell lines. An interpretation of this result is that the lesion in B104-5 cells is in a gene that is involved in determining the endocytic compartment morphologies observed in different cell lines. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Differences in thermotolerance induced by heat or sodium arsenite: cell killing and inhibition of protein synthesis

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells became thermotolerant after treatment with either heat for 10 min at 45.5 degrees C or incubation in 100 microM sodium arsenite for 1 h at 37 degrees C. Thermotolerance was tested using heat treatment at 45 degrees C or 43 degrees C administered 6-12 h after the inducing agent. At 45 degrees C thermotolerance ratios at 10(-2) isosurvival levels were 4.2 and 3.8 for heat and sodium arsenite, respectively. Recovery from heat damage as measured by resumption of protein synthesis was more rapid in heat-induced thermotolerant cells than in either sodium arsenite-induced thermotolerant cells or nonthermotolerant cells. Differences in inhibition of protein synthesis between heat-induced thermotolerant cells and sodium arsenite-induced thermotolerant cells were also evident after test heating at 43 degrees C for 5 h. At this temperature heat-induced thermotolerant cells were protected immediately from inhibition of protein synthesis, whereas sodium arsenite-induced thermotolerant cells, while initially suppressed, gradually recovered within 24 h. Furthermore, adding cycloheximide during the thermotolerance development period greatly inhibited sodium arsenite-induced thermotolerance (SF less than 10(-6] but not heat-induced thermotolerance (SF = 1.7 X 10(-1] when tested with 43 degrees C for 5 h. Our results suggest that both the development of thermotolerance and the thermotolerant state for the two agents, while similar in terms of survival, differed significantly for several parameters associated with protein synthesis.     

Time-temperature relationships for L1A2 cells step-down heated from 38 to 45 degrees C in vitro

The in vitro response of L1A2 cells to a single exposure to one temperature and to step-down heating was investigated. Single heating consisted of heating for a specified time at a constant temperature in the range 38.0-45.0 degrees C, whereas step-down heating involved a pretreatment of either 45.0 degrees C for 10 min or 42.0 degrees C for 90 min. The pretreatments were adjusted to give the same survival level. The survival curves for single heating had an initial shoulder followed by an exponential region, whereas for step-down heating they were strictly exponential and had no shoulder. The time-temperature relationship for cells exposed to single heating showed a biphasic Arrhenius curve with a downward inflection at 40.5 degrees C. Biphasic Arrhenius curves were also observed for step-down heating, but both the 45 degrees C/10 min and the 42 degrees C/90 min pretreatment showed an upward inflection that broke at 42.5 degrees C and 40.5 degrees C, respectively. The downward inflection on the Arrhenius curve for single heating has been attributed to thermotolerance development and the effect of step-down heating to a temporary inhibition of thermotolerance development. However, the present shape of the Arrhenius curves for step-down heating cannot be explained by inhibition of thermotolerance. It is therefore reasonable to assume that step-down heating is more than just the inhibition of thermotolerance, and that step-down heating and thermotolerance are distinct phenomena which act independently.     

Thermotolerance and thermosensitization in CHO and R1H cells: a comparative study

In CHO and R1H cells thermotolerance was induced by a pre-incubation at 40 degrees C, by an acute heat shock at 43 degrees C followed by a time interval at 37 degrees C, and during continuous heating at 42 degrees C. Thermotolerance, which was tested at 43 degrees C, primarily causes an increase in D0 of the heat-response curve. The degree of maximum thermotolerance was found to be generally more pronounced in CHO than in R1H cells, but the time interval at 37 degrees C, as well as at 40 degrees C, to reach this maximum level was the same in both cell lines. CHO and R1H cells could be sensitized to 40 degrees C by a pre-treatment at 43 degrees C. When compared for the same survival rate after pre-treatment at 43 degrees C alone the degree of thermosensitization was about the same in both cell lines. In either cell line thermosensitization was found to be suppressed when cells were made thermotolerant by a previous incubation at 40 degrees C for 16 hours.     

Rapidly reversible enzyme inhibition in a temperature-sensitive mammalian cell mutant lacks thermotolerance

The temperature-sensitive (ts) Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell mutant tsH1 contains a thermolabile leucyl-tRNA synthetase. Upon incubation at the nonpermissive temperature of 39.5 degrees C, the enzyme became reversibly inhibited over a period of minutes, and the cells lost viability over a period of many hours. However, killing of tsH1 by acute heating at 45 degrees C was identical to that of wild-type (SC) cells. In addition, the heat-induced inhibition of protein synthesis was similar for both cell types, as measured after acute heating at 45 degrees C. Furthermore, both killing and inhibition of protein synthesis showed thermotolerance in both cell types. In contrast to the effects at 45 degrees C, at 39.5 degrees C, neither the inhibition of leucyl-tRNA synthetase activity nor the killing of tsH1 expressed thermotolerance. Also, treatment of tsH1 at 39.5 degrees C did not induce thermotolerance to killing at 45 degrees C. The inhibition of leucyl-tRNA synthetase activity in tsH1 at 39.5 degrees C was further distinguished from the 45 degrees C-induced inhibition of protein synthesis in SC cells by a much more rapid reversal of the inhibition of leucyl-tRNA synthetase activity. Also, the rate of reversal of the inhibition of protein synthesis by 45 degrees C in SC cells was decreased by increased heat dose. Such was not true for the 39.5 degrees C inhibition of leucyl-tRNA synthetase activity in tsH1. The data indicate that there exist two distinct types of thermal inhibition--one slowly reversible type which was observed during and after heating at 45 degrees C and both induced and expressed thermotolerance, and a second, rapidly reversible type, which was evident only during heating of tsH1 at 39.5 degrees C and neither induced nor expressed thermotolerance.     

Thermotolerance induced by heat, sodium arsenite, or puromycin: its inhibition and differences between 43 degrees C and 45 degrees C

When CHO cells were treated either for 10 min at 45-45.5 degrees C or for 1 hr with 100 microM sodium arsenite (ARS) or for 2 hr with 20 micrograms/ml puromycin (PUR-20), they became thermotolerant to a heat treatment at 45-45.5 degrees C administered 4-14 hr later, with thermotolerance ratios at 10(-3) isosurvival of 4-6, 2-3.2, and 1.7, respectively. These treatments caused an increase in synthesis of HSP families (70, 87, and 110 kDa) relative to total protein synthesis. However, for a given amount of thermotolerance, the ARS and PUR-20 treatments induced 4 times more synthesis than the heat treatment. This decreased effectiveness of the ARS treatment may occur because ARS has been reported to stimulate minimal redistribution of HSP-70 to the nucleus and nucleolus. Inhibiting protein synthesis with cycloheximide (CHM, 10 micrograms/ml) or PUR (100 micrograms/ml) after the initial treatments greatly inhibited thermotolerance to 45-45.5 degrees C in all cases. However, for a challenge at 43 degrees C, thermotolerance was inhibited only for the ARS and PUR-20 treatments. CHM did not suppress heat-induced thermotolerance to 43 degrees C, which was the same as heat protection observed when CHM was added before and during heating at 43 degrees C without the initial heat treatment. These differences between the initial treatments and between 43 and 45 degrees C may possibly be explained by reports that show that heat causes more redistribution of HSP-70 to the nucleus and nucleolus than ARS and that redistribution of HSP-70 can occur during heating at 42 degrees C with or without the presence of CHM. Heating cells at 43 degrees C for 5 hr after thermotolerance had developed induced additional thermotolerance, as measured with a challenge at 45 degrees C immediately after heating at 43 degrees C. Compared to the nonthermotolerant cells, thermotolerance ratios were 10 for the ARS treatment and 8.5 for the initial heat treatment. Adding CHM (10 micrograms/ml) or PUR (100 micrograms/ml) to inhibit protein synthesis during heating at 43 degrees C did not greatly reduce this additional thermotolerance. If, however, protein synthesis was inhibited between the initial heat treatment and heating at 43 degrees C, protein synthesis was required during 43 degrees C for the development of additional thermotolerance to 45 degrees C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Involvement of rRNA synthesis in the enhanced survival and recovery of protein synthesis seen in thermotolerance

Although acquired thermotolerance has been linked to the induction of heat shock proteins, the molecular mechanism(s) by which cells become resistant to heat is unknown. The present study shows a strong correlation between the survival of cells following heat shock and the rate of recovery of protein, total RNA, and rRNA synthesis. Increasing exposure of CHO cells to 45 degrees C was found to decrease survival and cause a lengthening delay in these synthetic processes. The same reciprocal correlation was seen in thermotolerant cells. As thermotolerance develops, more cells survive a heat challenge and the delay in synthesis decreases. These data argue that enhanced recovery of protein and RNA synthesis is one factor which plays a key role in thermotolerance. The involvement of rRNA synthesis was further investigated by using actinomycin D at 0.1 microgram m1(-1), a concentration at which rRNA synthesis is selectively inhibited. When the drug was present during the recovery from a challenge heat treatment, the survival of thermotolerant cells was approximately 3-fold lower than expected from the mild toxicity of the drug. As this could not be accounted for by an interaction of the drug with the response of cells to single heat treatments, it is concluded that the drug inhibits the expression of thermotolerance in cells which would otherwise express a full degree of thermotolerance. The time and concentration dependence of this effect indicates that the drug acts though inhibition of rRNA synthesis. Therefore, enhanced recovery of RNA synthesis, presumably rRNA synthesis, is identified as one of the mechanisms responsible for enhanced survival of thermotolerant cells following heat shock.     

Characterization of the Arabidopsis thermosensitive mutant atts02 reveals an important role for galactolipids in thermotolerance

Plants are constantly challenged with various abiotic stresses in their natural environment. Elevated temperatures have a detrimental impact on overall plant growth and productivity. Many plants increase their tolerance to high temperatures through an adaptation response known as acquired thermotolerance. To identify the various mechanisms that plants have evolved to cope with high temperature stress, we have isolated a series of Arabidopsis mutants that are defective in the acquisition of thermotolerance after an exposure to 38 degrees C, a treatment that induces acquired thermotolerance in wild-type plants. One of these mutants, atts02, was not only defective in acquiring thermotolerance after the treatment, but also displayed a reduced level of basal thermotolerance in a 30 degrees C growth assay. The affected gene in atts02 was identified by positional cloning and encodes digalactosyldiacylglycerol synthase 1 (DGD1) (the atts02 mutant was, at that point, renamed dgd1-2). An additional dgd1 allele, dgd1-3, was identified in two other mutant lines displaying altered acquired thermotolerance, atts100 and atts104. Expression patterns of several heat shock proteins (HSPs) in heat-treated dgd1-2 homozygous plants were similar to those from identically treated wild-type plants, suggesting that the thermosensitivity in the dgd1-2 mutant was not caused by a defect in HSP induction. Lipid analysis of wild-type and mutant plants indicated a close correlation between the ability to acquire thermotolerance and the increases in digalactosyldiacylglycerol (DGDG) level and in the ratio of DGDG to monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG). Thermosensitivity in dgd1-2 and dgd1-3 was associated with (1) a decreased DGDG level and (2) an inability to increase the ratio of DGDG to MGDG upon exposure to a 38 degrees C sublethal temperature treatment. Our results suggest that the DGDG level and/or the ratio of DGDG to MGDG may play an important role in basal as well as acquired thermotolerance in Arabidopsis.     

Interspecies complementation analysis of xeroderma pigmentosum and UV-sensitive chinese hamster cells

Complementation analysis was performed 24 h after fusion of UV-sensitive CHO cells (CHO 12 RO) with XP cells of complementation groups A, B, C, D, F and G. The parental cells are characterized by low levels of unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS). In all combinations, the UDS levels observed in heterokaryons were higher than those in parental mutant cells, clearly indicating cooperation of human and Chinese hamster repair functions. In heterokaryons of CHO 12 RO with XP-A and XP-C cells, the UDS values reached about the normal human level, whereas in heterokaryons with XP-B, XP-D and XP-F, UDS was restored at a level approaching that in wild-type CHO cells. The results obtained after fusion of CHO cells with two representative cell strains from the XP-G group, XP 2 BI and XP 3 BR, were inconsistent. Fusion with XP 3 BR cells yielded UDS levels ranging from wild-type Chinese hamster to normal human, whereas fusion with XP 2 BI cells resulted in a slight increase in UDS which even after 48 h remained below the level found in wild-type CHO cells. The occurrence of complementation in these interspecies heterokaryons indicates that the genetic defect in the CHO 12 RO cells is different from the defects in the XP complementation groups tested.     

Requirement of the Escherichia coli dnaK gene for thermotolerance and protection against H2O2

Thermotolerance in Escherichia coli is induced by exposing cells to a brief heat shock (42 degrees C for 15 min). This results in resistance to the lethal effect of exposure to a higher temperature (50 degrees C). Mutants defective in the recA, uvrA and xthA genes are more sensitive to heat than the wild-type. However, after development of thermotolerance these mutants are like the wild-type in their heat sensitivity. This suggests that thermotolerance is an inducible response capable of protecting cells from the lethal effects of heat, independently of recA, uvrA and xthA. Thermotolerance does not develop in a dnaK mutant. In addition, the dnaK mutant is sensitive to heat and H2O2, but is resistant to UV irradiation. This implies that the E. coli heat-shock response includes a mechanism that protects cells from heat and H2O2, but not from UV.     

Molybdate induces thermotolerance in yeast

Application of a mild heat pretreatment, performed by shifting cells from 27 degrees C to 37 degrees C led to the protection of yeast cells from death due to a subsequent extreme heat shock at 53 degrees C. The presence of cycloheximide inhibited this induction of thermotolerance, indicating the involvement of de novo protein. The phosphatase inhibitor sodium molybdate induced thermotolerance to the non-pretreated yeast cells. This induction of thermotolerance did not seem to depend upon de novo protein synthesis. Thus, acquisition of thermotolerance in yeast may involve a number of cellular mechanisms depending on the conditions the organism encounters at any particular time.     

T lymphocyte stress response. II. Protection of translation and DNA replication against some forms of stress by prior hyperthermic stress

We have compared the effects of a mild heat shock and febrile temperatures on heat-shock protein (hsp) synthesis and development of stress tolerance in T lymphocytes. Our previous studies demonstrated that febrile temperatures (less than or equal to 41 degrees C) induced the synthesis of hsp110, hsp90, and the constitutive or cognate form of hsp70 (hscp70; a weak induction of the strongly stress-induced hsp70 was also observed. In the studies reported herein, we demonstrate that a mild heat shock (42.5 degrees C) reverses this ratio; that is, hsp70 and not hscp70 is the predominate member of this family synthesized at this temperature. Modest heat shock also enhanced the synthesis of hsp110 and hsp90. In order to assess the relationship between hsp synthesis and the acquisition of thermotolerance, purified T cells were first incubated at 42.5 degrees C (induction temperature) and then subsequently subjected to a severe heat-shock challenge (45 degrees C, 30 min). T cells first incubated at a mild heat-shock temperature were capable of total protein synthesis at a more rapid rate following a severe heat shock than control cells (induction temperature 37 degrees C). This phenomenon, which has been previously termed translational tolerance, did not develop in cells incubated at the febrile temperature (induction temperature 41 degrees C). Protection of translation also extended to immunologically relevant proteins such as interleukin-2 and the interleukin-2 receptor. Because clonal expansion is a critical event during an immune response, the effects of hyperthermic stress on DNA replication (mitogen-induced T cell proliferation) was also evaluated in thermotolerant T cells. DNA synthesis in control cells (induction temperature 37 degrees C) was severely inhibited following heat-shock challenge at 44 degrees C or 45 degrees C; in contrast, T cells preincubated at 42.5 degrees C rapidly recovered their DNA synthetic capacity. T cells preincubated at a febrile temperature were moderately protected against hyperthermic stress. The acquisition of thermotolerance was also associated with enhanced resistance to chemical (ethanol)-induced stress but not to heavy metal toxicity (cadmium) or dexamethasone-induced immunosuppression. These studies suggest that prior hsp synthesis may protect immune function against some forms of stress (e.g., febrile episode) but would be ineffective against others such as elevated glucocorticoid levels which normally occur during an immune response.