Effects of cell cycle dependent histone H1 phosphorylation on chromatin structure and chromatin replication.

We have reconstituted salt-treated SV40 minichromosomes with differentially phosphorylated forms of histone H1 extracted from either G0-, S- or M-phase cells. Sedimentation studies revealed a clear difference between minichromosomes reconstituted with S-phase histone H1 compared with histone H1 from G0- or M-phase cells, indicating that the phosphorylation state of histone H1 has a direct effect on chromatin structure. Using reconstituted minichromosomes as substrate in the SV40 in vitro replication system, we measured a higher replication efficiency for SV40 minichromosomes reconstituted with S-phase histone H1 compared with G0- or M-phase histone H1. These data indicate that the chromatin structure induced by the phosphorylation of histone H1 influences the replication efficiency of SV40 minichromosomes in vitro.     

The enhancement of histone H4 and H2A serine 1 phosphorylation during mitosis and S-phase is evolutionarily conserved

Histone phosphorylation has long been associated with condensed mitotic chromatin; however, the functional roles of these modifications are not yet understood. Histones H1 and H3 are highly phosphorylated from late G2 through telophase in many organisms, and have been implicated in chromatin condensation and sister chromatid segregation. However, mutational analyses in yeast and biochemical experiments with Xenopus extracts have demonstrated that phosphorylation of H1 and H3 is not essential for such processes. In this study, we investigated additional histone phosphorylation events that may have redundant functions to H1 and H3 phosphorylation during mitosis. We developed an antibody to H4 and H2A that are phosphorylated at their respective serine 1 (S1) residues and found that H4S1/H2AS1 are highly phosphorylated in the mitotic chromatin of worm, fly, and mammals. Mitotic H4/H2A phosphorylation has similar timing and localization as H3 phosphorylation, and closely correlates with the chromatin condensation events during mitosis. We also detected a lower level of H4/H2A phosphorylation in 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine-positive S-phase cells, which corroborates earlier studies that identified H4S1 phosphorylation on newly synthesized histones during S-phase. The evolutionarily conserved phosphorylation of H4/H2A during the cell cycle suggests that they may have a dual purpose in chromatin condensation during mitosis and histone deposition during S-phase.Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-004-0281-9Communicated by G. Almouzni     

The topoisomerase II inhibitor VM-26 induces marked changes in histone H1 kinase activity, histones H1 and H3 phosphorylation, and chromosome condensation in G2 phase and mitotic BHK cells

We have examined the effects of topoisomerase inhibitors on the phosphorylation of histones in chromatin during the G2 and the M phases of the cell cycle. Throughout the G2 phase of BHK cells, addition of the topoisomerase II inhibitor VM-26 prevented histone H1 phosphorylation, accompanied by the inhibition of intracellular histone H1 kinase activity. However, VM-26 had no inhibitory effect on the activity of the kinase in vitro, suggesting an indirect influence on histone H1 kinase activity. Entry into mitosis was also prevented, as monitored by the absence of nuclear lamina depolymerization, chromosome condensation, and histone H3 phosphorylation. In contrast, the topoisomerase I inhibitor, camptothecin, inhibited histone H1 phosphorylation and entry into mitosis only when applied at early G2. In cells that were arrested in mitosis, VM-26 induced dephosphorylation of histones H1 and H3, DNA breaks, and partial chromosome decondensation. These changes in chromatin parameters probably reverse the process of chromosome condensation, unfolding condensed regions to permit the repair of strand breaks in the DNA that were induced by VM- 26. The involvement of growth-associated histone H1 kinase in these processes raises the possibility that the cell detects breaks in the DNA through their effects on the state of DNA supercoiling in constrained domains or loops. It would appear that histone H1 kinase and topoisomerase II work coordinately in both chromosome condensation and decondensation, and that this process participates in the VM-26- induced G2 arrest of the cell.     

Sequential phsophorylation of histone subfractions in the Chinese hamster cell cycle.

Ion exchange chromatography and preparative electrophoresis were used to examine the phosphorylation of histone f1 and f3 subfractions in synchronized Chinese hamster cells (line CHO). Three discrete f1 phosphorylation events were demonstrated to occur in sequence during the cell cycle. The first event (f1G1) commenced in G1 2 hours prior to entry of cells into S phase; the second event (f1s) commenced simultaneously with initiation of DNA synthesis; and the third event (f1M) commenced when cells entered mitosis. F1M phosphorylation occurred simultaneously with the phosphorylation of histone f3 (which is not phosphorylated during G1, S, or G2). Fractionation of f1 and f3 revealed no differences in these sequential phosphorylation patterns among the various f1 and f3 subfractions, indicating that these phosphorylations are general biochemical events of the cell cycle. Phosphorylated (f1G1) was found to accumulate in cells as they traversed THEIR CELL CYCLE. F1s was phosphorylated to twice the extent of f1G1, but f1s did not accumulate in the cells as they passed through interphase. F1M was phosphorylated to about 4 times the extent of the first phosphorylated form (f1G1). A model of the relationship of histone phosphorylation to the cell cycle is presented which suggests that (a) f1G1 phosphorylation is involved with chromatin structural changes necessary for cell proliferation; (b) f1s phosphorylation is involved with DNA replication; (c) F1M and f3 phosphorylations are involved in chromosome condensation.     

Action of heparin on mammalian nuclei. II. Cell-cycle-specific changes in chromatin organization correlate temporally with histone H1 phosphorylation

The interaction of the polyanion heparin with the inner histones of chromatin has been used to detect changes in chromatin organization associated with cell-cycle traverse. Synchronized populations of Chinese hamster cells were obtained either in early G1 or near the G1/S boundary. The rate of interaction of heparin with chromatin-associated inner histones was measured using nuclei isolated from synchronized cell populations in different phases of the cell cycle. A G1-specific decrease in rate of interaction of heparin with inner histones was observed and found to be independent of the presence of hydroxyurea during traverse of G1. A further decrease in heparin-inner histone interaction occurred in late S and G2. These changes correlate temporally with the interphase phosphorylation(s) of histone H1. This correlation is discussed within the framework of current models of higher order chromatin structure (i.e. organization above the nucleosome level). Analysis of the cooperativity of interaction of heparin with inner histones was performed using the kinetic analog of the Hill equation. This analysis suggests that the organization of inner histones on chromatin does not undergo large variations during the cell cycle.     

Cell cycle-dependent expression of phosphorylated histone H2AX: reduced expression in unirradiated but not X-irradiated G1-phase cells

Exposure of cells to ionizing radiation causes phosphorylation of histone H2AX at sites flanking DNA double-strand breaks. Detection of phosphorylated H2AX (gammaH2AX) by antibody binding has been used as a method to identify double-strand breaks. Although generally performed by observing microscopic foci within cells, flow cytometry offers the advantage of measuring changes in gammaH2AX intensity in relation to cell cycle position. The importance of cell cycle position on the levels of endogenous and radiation-induced gammaH2AX was examined in cell lines that varied in DNA content, cell cycle distribution, and kinase activity. Bivariate analysis of gammaH2AX expression relative to DNA content and synchronization by centrifugal elutriation were used to measure cell cycle-specific expression of gammaH2AX. With the exception of xrs5 cells, gammaH2AX level was approximately 3 times lower in unirradiated G(1)-phase cells than S- and G(2)-phase cells, and the slope of the G(1)-phase dose-response curve was 2.8 times larger than the slope for S-phase cells. Cell cycle differences were confirmed using immunoblotting, indicating that reduced antibody accessibility in intact cells was not responsible for the reduced antibody binding in G(1)-phase cells. Early apoptotic cells could be easily identified on flow histograms as a population with 5-10-fold higher levels of gammaH2AX, although high expression was not maintained in apoptotic cells by 24 h. We conclude that expression of gammaH2AX is associated with DNA replication in unirradiated cells and that this reduces the sensitivity for detecting radiation-induced double-strand breaks in S- and G(2)-phase cells.     

NAP-2: histone chaperone function and phosphorylation state through the cell cycle

We have recently cloned the human nucleosome assembly protein 2 (NAP-2). Here, we demonstrate that casein kinase 2 (CKII) from HeLa cell nuclear extracts interacts with immobilized NAP-II, and phosphorylates both NAP-2 and nucleosome assembly protein 1 (NAP-1) in vitro. Furthermore, NAP-1 and NAP-2 phosphorylation in crude HeLa cell extracts is abolished by heparin, a specific inhibitor of CKII. Addition of core histones can stimulate phosphorylation of NAP-1 and NAP-2 by CKII. NAP-2 is also a phosphoprotein in vivo. The protein is phosphorylated at the G0/G1 boundary but it is not phosphorylated in S-phase. Here, we show that NAP-2 is a histone chaperone throughout the cell cycle and that its cell-cycle distribution might be governed by its phosphorylation status. Phosphorylated NAP-2 remains in the cytoplasm in a complex with histones during the G0/G1 transition, whereas its dephosphorylation triggers its transport into the nucleus, at the G1/S-boundary, with the histone cargo, suggesting that binding to histones does not depend on phosphorylation status. Finally, indirect immunofluorescence shows that NAP-2 is present during metaphase of HeLa and COS cells, and its localization is distinct from metaphase chromosomes.     

Partial displacement of histone H1 from chromatin is required before it can be phosphorylated by mitotic H1 kinase in vitro.

The massive nonselective and reversible phosphorylation of histone H1 during mitosis is a universal phenomenon among eukaryotes. The growth-associated kinase responsible for this phosphorylation is identical to the maturation promoting factor, a key regulator of the cell cycle. Here we showed that growth-associated kinase, isolated from mitotic HeLa cells which were capable of phosphorylating HeLa H1 in vitro with high activity and mostly at the same sites phosphorylated during mitosis in vivo (assayed by two-dimensional analysis of tryptic phosphopeptides), did not significantly phosphorylate chromatin-bound or nuclear H1 in vitro. Its inability to phosphorylate chromatin-bound H1 did not change when the amount of kinase was increased or the incubation was prolonged. The resistance of chromatin-bound H1 to phosphorylation did not result from chromatin aggregation. Rapid phosphorylation of H1 in vitro, as well as in a nuclear system, was restored when NaCl concentrations were raised above 200 mM where H1:DNA interactions are weakened. At 300 mM NaCl, chromatin-bound H1 was phosphorylated in a subset of the sites observed for free H1 phosphorylated in vitro. These results suggest that active displacement of H1 from chromatin DNA may take place before H1 can be fully phosphorylated during mitosis.     

Analysis of dynamic changes in post-translational modifications of human histones during cell cycle by mass spectrometry

The N-terminal tails of the four core histones are subject to several types of covalent post-translational modifications that have specific roles in regulating chromatin structure and function. Here we present an extensive analysis of the core histone modifications occurring through the cell cycle. Our MS experiments characterized the modification patterns of histones from HeLa cells arrested in phase G1, S, and G2/M. For all core histones, the modifications in the G1 and S phases were largely identical but drastically different during mitosis. Modification changes between S and G2/M phases were quantified using the SILAC (stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture) approach. Most striking was the mitotic phosphorylation on histone H3 and H4, whereas phosphorylation on H2A was constant during the cell cycle. A loss of acetylation was observed on all histones in G2/M-arrested cells. The pattern of cycle-dependent methylation was more complex: during G2/M, H3 Lys27 and Lys36 were decreased, whereas H4 Lys20 was increased. Our results show that mitosis was the period of the cell cycle during which many modifications exhibit dynamic changes.     

Dynamics and dispensability of variant-specific histone H1 Lys-26/Ser-27 and Thr-165 post-translational modifications

In mammals, the linker histone H1, involved in DNA packaging into chromatin, is represented by a family of variants. H1 tails undergo post-translational modifications (PTMs) that can be detected by mass spectrometry. We developed antibodies to analyze several of these as yet unexplored PTMs including the combination of H1.4 K26 acetylation or trimethylation and S27 phosphorylation. H1.2-T165 phosphorylation was detected at S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle and was dispensable for chromatin binding and cell proliferation; while the H1.4-K26 residue was essential for proper cell cycle progression. We conclude that histone H1 PTMs are dynamic over the cell cycle and that the recognition of modified lysines may be affected by phosphorylation of adjacent residues.     

Chromatin remodeling by cell cycle stage-specific extracts from Physarum polycephalum

Remodeling of chromatin is an essential process allowing the establishment of specific genetic programs. The slime mold Physarum polycephalum presents the attractive advantage of natural synchrony of the cell cycle in several million nuclei. Whole-cell extracts prepared at precise stages during the cell cycle were tested for the ability to induce remodeling in erythrocyte nuclei as monitored by microscopy, protamine competition assays, micrococcal nuclease digestions, and release of histone H5. Extracts derived from two specific cell cycle stages caused opposite types of changes in erythrocyte nuclei. An increase in chromatin compaction was imparted by extracts prepared during S-phase while extracts harvested at the end of G2-phase caused increases in nuclear volume, DNA accessibility, and release of linker histone. We also found that late G2 extracts had the ability to alter the DNase I digestion profile of mononucleosomes reconstituted in vitro in a classical nucleosomes remodeling assay. The relevance of these finding to the Physarum cell cycle is discussed.     

Histone H1 of Trypanosoma cruzi is concentrated in the nucleolus region and disperses upon phosphorylation during progression to mitosis

Phosphorylation of histone H1 is intimately related to the cell cycle progression in higher eukaryotes, reaching maximum levels during mitosis. We have previously shown that in the flagellated protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi, which does not condense chromatin during mitosis, histone H1 is phosphorylated at a single cyclin-dependent kinase site. By using an antibody that recognizes specifically the phosphorylated T. cruzi histone H1 site, we have now confirmed that T. cruzi histone H1 is also phosphorylated in a cell cycle-dependent manner. Differently from core histones, the bulk of nonphosphorylated histone H1 in G(1) and S phases of the cell cycle is concentrated in the central regions of the nucleus, which contains the nucleolus and less densely packed chromatin. When cells pass G(2), histone H1 becomes phosphorylated and starts to diffuse. At the onset of mitosis, histone H1 phosphorylation is maximal and found in the entire nuclear space. As permeabilized parasites preferentially lose phosphorylated histone H1, we conclude that this modification promotes its release from less condensed and nucleolar chromatin after G(2).     

Differential contribution of inhibitory phosphorylation of CDC2 and CDK2 for unperturbed cell cycle control and DNA integrity checkpoints

Inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) by Thr14/Tyr15 phosphorylation is critical for normal cell cycle progression and is a converging event for several cell cycle checkpoints. In this study, we compared the relative contribution of inhibitory phosphorylation for cyclin A/B1-CDC2 and cyclin A/E-CDK2 complexes. We found that inhibitory phosphorylation plays a major role in the regulation of CDC2 but only a minor role for CDK2 during the unperturbed cell cycle of HeLa cells. The relative importance of inhibitory phosphorylation of CDC2 and CDK2 may reflect their distinct cellular functions. Despite this, expression of nonphosphorylation mutants of both CDC2 and CDK2 triggered unscheduled histone H3 phosphorylation early in the cell cycle and was cytotoxic. DNA damage by a radiomimetic drug or replication block by hydroxyurea stimulated a buildup of cyclin B1 but was accompanied by an increase of inhibitory phosphorylation of CDC2. After DNA damage and replication block, all cyclin-CDK pairs that control S phase and mitosis were to different degrees inhibited by phosphorylation. Ectopic expression of nonphosphorylated CDC2 stimulated DNA replication, histone H3 phosphorylation, and cell division even after DNA damage. Similarly, a nonphosphorylation mutant of CDK2, but not CDK4, disrupted the G2 DNA damage checkpoint. Finally, CDC25A, CDC25B, a dominant-negative CHK1, but not CDC25C or a dominant-negative WEE1, stimulated histone H3 phosphorylation after DNA damage. These data suggest differential contributions for the various regulators of Thr14/Tyr15 phosphorylation in normal cell cycle and during the DNA damage checkpoint.     

Hyperphosphorylation of histone H2A.X and dephosphorylation of histone H1 subtypes in the course of apoptosis.

Chromatin condensation paralleled by DNA fragmentation is one of the most important nuclear events occurring during apoptosis. Histone modifications, and in particular phosphorylation, have been suggested to affect chromatin function and structure during both cell cycle and cell death. We report here that phosphate incorporation into all H1 subtypes decreased rapidly after induction of apoptosis, evidently causing a strong reduction in phosphorylated forms of main H1 histone subtypes. H1 dephosphorylation is accompanied by chromatin condensation preceding the onset of typical chromatin oligonucleosomal fragmentation, whereas H2A.X hyperphosphorylation is strongly correlated to apoptotic chromatin fragmentation. Using various kinase inhibitors we were able to exclude some of the possible kinases which can be involved directly or indirectly in phosphorylation of histone H2A.X. Neither DNA-dependent protein kinase, protein kinase A, protein kinase G, nor the kinases driven by the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAP) pathway appear to be responsible for H2A.X phosphorylation. The protein kinase C activator phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), however, markedly reduced the induction of apoptosis in TNFalpha-treated cells with a simultaneous change in the phosphorylation pattern of histone H2A.X. Hyperphosphorylation of H2A.X in apoptotic cells depends indirectly on activation of caspases and nuclear scaffold proteases as shown in zVAD-(OMe)-fmk- or zAPF-cmk-treated cells, whereas the dephosphorylation of H1 subtypes seems to be influenced solely by caspase inhibitors. Together, these results illustrate that H1 dephosphorylation and H2A.X hyperphosphorylation are necessary steps on the apoptotic pathway.     

Chromatin unfolding by Cdt1 regulates MCM loading via opposing functions of HBO1 and HDAC11-geminin

The efficiency of metazoan origins of DNA replication is known to be enhanced by histone acetylation near origins. Although this correlates with increased MCM recruitment, the mechanism by which such acetylation regulates MCM loading is unknown. We show here that Cdt1 induces large scale chromatin decondensation that is required for MCM recruitment. This process occurs in G1, is suppressed by Geminin, and requires HBO1 HAT activity and histone H4 modifications. HDAC11, which binds Cdt1 and replication origins during S-phase, potently inhibits Cdt1-induced chromatin unfolding and re-replication, suppresses MCM loading, and binds Cdt1 more efficiently in the presence of Geminin. We also demonstrate that chromatin at endogenous origins is more accessible in G1 relative to S-phase. These results provide evidence that histone acetylation promotes MCM loading via enhanced chromatin accessibility. This process is regulated positively by Cdt1 and HBO1 in G1 and repressed by Geminin-HDAC11 association with Cdt1 in S-phase, and represents a novel form of replication licensing control.     

Cell-cycle-regulated control of VSG expression site silencing by histones and histone chaperones ASF1A and CAF-1b in Trypanosoma brucei

Antigenic variation in African trypanosomes involves monoallelic expression and reversible silencing of variant surface glycoprotein (VSG) genes found adjacent to telomeres in polycistronic expression sites (ESs). We assessed the impact on ES silencing of five candidate essential chromatin-associated factors that emerged from a genome-wide RNA interference viability screen. Using this approach, we demonstrate roles in VSG ES silencing for two histone chaperones. Defects in S-phase progression in cells depleted for histone H3, or either chaperone, highlight in particular the link between chromatin assembly and DNA replication control. S-phase checkpoint arrest was incomplete, however, allowing G₂/M-specific VSG ES derepression following knockdown of histone H3. In striking contrast, knockdown of anti-silencing factor 1A (ASF1A) allowed for derepression at all cell cycle stages, whereas knockdown of chromatin assembly factor 1b (CAF-1b) revealed derepression predominantly in S-phase and G₂/M. Our results support a central role for chromatin in maintaining VSG ES silencing. ASF1A and CAF-1b appear to play constitutive and DNA replication-dependent roles, respectively, in the recycling and assembly of chromatin. Defects in these functions typically lead to arrest in S-phase but defective cells can also progress through the cell cycle leading to nucleosome depletion and derepression of telomeric VSG ESs.