Gammaretroviral integration into nucleosomal target DNA in vivo

Some of the earliest studies of retroviral integration targeting reported that sites of gammaretroviral DNA integration were positively correlated with DNase I-hypersensitive sites in chromatin. This led to the suggestion that open chromatin was favorable for integration. More recent deep sequencing experiments confirmed that gammaretroviral integration sites and DNase I cleavage sites are associated in genome-wide surveys. Paradoxically, in vitro studies of integration show that nucleosomal DNA is actually favored over naked DNA, raising the question of whether integration target DNA in chromosomes is wrapped in nucleosomes or nucleosome free. In this study we examined gammaretroviral integration by infecting primary human CD4(+) T lymphocytes with a murine leukemia virus (MLV)-based retroviral vector or xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus (XMRV), and isolated 32,585 unique integration sites using ligation-mediated PCR and 454 pyrosequencing. CD4(+) T lymphocytes were chosen for study because of the particularly dense genome-wide mapping of chromatin features available for comparison. Analysis relative to predicted nucleosome positions showed that gammaretroviruses direct integration into outward-facing major grooves on nucleosome-wrapped DNA, similar to the integration pattern of HIV. Also, a suite of histone modifications correlated with gene activity are positively associated with integration by both MLV and XMRV. Thus, we conclude that favored integration near DNase I-hypersensitive sites does not imply that integration takes place exclusively in nucleosome-free regions.     

Estimated comparative integration hotspots identify different behaviors of retroviral gene transfer vectors

Integration of retroviral vectors in the human genome follows non random patterns that favor insertional deregulation of gene expression and may cause risks of insertional mutagenesis when used in clinical gene therapy. Understanding how viral vectors integrate into the human genome is a key issue in predicting these risks. We provide a new statistical method to compare retroviral integration patterns. We identified the positions where vectors derived from the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and the Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus (MLV) show different integration behaviors in human hematopoietic progenitor cells. Non-parametric density estimation was used to identify candidate comparative hotspots, which were then tested and ranked. We found 100 significative comparative hotspots, distributed throughout the chromosomes. HIV hotspots were wider and contained more genes than MLV ones. A Gene Ontology analysis of HIV targets showed enrichment of genes involved in antigen processing and presentation, reflecting the high HIV integration frequency observed at the MHC locus on chromosome 6. Four histone modifications/variants had a different mean density in comparative hotspots (H2AZ, H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K9me1), while gene expression within the comparative hotspots did not differ from background. These findings suggest the existence of epigenetic or nuclear three-dimensional topology contexts guiding retroviral integration to specific chromosome areas.     

Retroviral DNA integration: HIV and the role of LEDGF/p75

To replicate, a retrovirus must integrate a DNA copy of its RNA genome into a chromosome of the host cell. Integration is not random in the host genome but favors particular regions, and preferences differ among retroviruses. Several mechanisms might play a part in this favored integration targeting: (i) open chromatin might be preferentially accessible for viral DNA integration; (ii) DNA replication during cell division might facilitate access of integration complexes to favored sites; and (iii) cellular proteins bound to the host chromosome might tether integration complexes to favored regions. This review summarizes recent advances in understanding the mechanisms of retroviral integration, focusing on LEDGF/p75--the first cellular protein shown to have a role in directing HIV DNA integration. Studies on LEDGF/p75 indicate that it directs HIV integration site selection by a tethering interaction, whereas the chromatin accessibility or cell cycle models are less well supported. Understanding viral integration will help improve the safety of retrovirus-based vectors used in gene therapy.