The 51-63 base pair of tRNA confers specificity for binding by EF-Tu

Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) exhibits significant specificity for the different elongator tRNA bodies in order to offset its variable affinity to the esterified amino acid. Three X-ray cocrystal structures reveal that while most of the contacts with the protein involve the phosphodiester backbone of tRNA, a single hydrogen bond is observed between the Glu390 and the amino group of a guanine in the 51-63 base pair in the T-stem of tRNA. Here we show that the Glu390Ala mutation of Thermus thermophilus EF-Tu selectively destabilizes binding of those tRNAs containing a guanine at either position 51 or 63 and that mutagenesis of the 51-63 base pair in several tRNAs modulates their binding affinities to EF-Tu. A comparison of Escherichia coli tRNA sequences suggests that this specificity mechanism is conserved across the bacterial domain. While this contact is an important specificity determinant, it is clear that others remain to be identified.     

The affinity of elongation factor Tu for an aminoacyl-tRNA is modulated by the esterified amino acid

When different mutations were introduced into the anticodon loop and at position 73 of YFA2, a derivative of yeast tRNA(Phe), a single tRNA body was misacylated with 13 different amino acids. The affinities of these misacylated tRNAs for Thermus thermophilus elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu).GTP were determined using a ribonuclease protection assay. A range of 2.5 kcal/mol in the binding energies was observed, clearly demonstrating that EF-Tu specifically recognizes the side chain of the esterified amino acid. Furthermore, this specificity can be altered by introducing a mutation in the amino acid binding pocket on the surface of EF-Tu. Also, when discussed in conjunction with the previously determined specificity of EF-Tu for the tRNA body, these experiments further demonstrate that EF-Tu uses thermodynamic compensation to bind cognate aminoacyl-tRNAs similarly.     

A tRNA aminoacylation system for non-natural amino acids based on a programmable ribozyme

The ability to recognize tRNA identities is essential to the function of the genetic coding system. In translation aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARSs) recognize the identities of tRNAs and charge them with their cognate amino acids. We show that an in vitro evolved ribozyme can also discriminate between specific tRNAs, and can transfer amino acids to the 3' ends of cognate tRNAs. The ribozyme interacts with both the CCA-3' terminus and the anticodon loop of tRNA(fMet), and its tRNA specificity is controlled by these interactions. This feature allows us to program the selectivity of the ribozyme toward specific tRNAs, and therefore to tailor effective aminoacyl-transfer catalysts. This method potentially provides a means of generating aminoacyl tRNAs that are charged with non-natural amino acids, which could be incorporated into proteins through cell-free translation.     

Recognition between tRNAs and aminoacyl-tRNA-synthetases of different specificities]

A few examples of incorrect interactions between aminoacyl-tRNA-synthetases and tRNAs extracted from the same organism have already been demonstrated. These interactions can lead, in most cases, to incorrect aminoacylations. The lack of specificity of the aminoacyl-tRNA suggests that incorrect interactions could be a general phenomenon. The aim of this study is to check whether incorrect interactions are a general feature, i.e. whether every aminoacyl-tTNA-synthetase is able to interact with homologous non-cognate tRNAs. In that case, it is interesting to know whether a given aminoacyl-tRNA-synthetase is able to recognize any tRNA or only a particular group of tRNAs. The existence of such groups would lead to the concept of tRNA families. For that, we estimated the affinities of non-cognate homologous tRNA species for yeast valyl-tRNA-synthetase by using competition experiments. The measured affinities varied, in standard aminoacylation conditions, between 1:100 to 1:1000 of that of the non-cognate tRNA. In the absence of Mg2+ ions or in the presence of low concentration of this cation, the affinities were higher and could reach 1:3 of the affinity of the cognate tRNA. On the other hand, we determined the inhibitory effect of a high concentration of tRNAVal toward the aminoacylation of tRNAs specific for 13 amino acids. In order to compare the effects, we determined approximate Km/Ki values. These values ranged from 0.07 for methionyl tRNA synthetase to 0.002 for leucyl tRNA synthetase. For some aminoacyl-tRNA-synthetases, the inhibition was too low to be detected by this technique. Two conclusions arise from this study. First, it seems that non-specific recognitions are quite a general phenomenon. Secondly, if one classifies tTNAs according to their affinities for valyl-tRNA-synthetase, it does not appear any well cut group of tRNAs. This result is not conflicting with the fact that on the basis of aminoacylation criteria several authors have found tRNA and aminoacyl-tRNA-synthetase families since we have already shown that discrimination depends rather on the maximal velocity of the reaction than on the affinity between the tRNA and the aminoacyl-tRNA-synthetases. Finally, the non-existence of clear-cut recognition families of tRNAs casts some doubts on the approach consisting in the characterisation of recognition sites of the tRNAs by the aminoacyl-tRNA-synthetases by comparing the sequences of tRNAs which are amonoacylated by a given aminoacyl-tRNA-synthetase.     

Modeling with in vitro kinetic parameters for the elaboration of transfer RNA identity in vivo

A tRNA with "double identity" was created, and this tRNA was demonstrated in vitro to aminoacylate quantitatively with either of two amino acids. In contrast, acceptance of only one of these amino acids was observed in vivo, and a simple manipulation determined which one was accepted. Kinetic parameters were obtained for aminoacylation with each amino acid of the tRNA with double identity and of related tRNAs. Modeling with these parameters largely explains which amino acid specificity is observed in vivo. The results delineate some of the kinetic boundaries for the design and accommodation of tRNA sequence variations in the elaboration of identity in vivo.     

Amino acid specificity of the transfer RNA species coded for by HeLa cell mitochondrial DNA

The amino acid specificity of the tRNA species coded for by HeLa cell mitochondrial DNA has been investigated by carrying out hybridizations between amino acid-tRNA complexes labeled in the amino acid and separated mitochondrial DNA strands.The results indicate that there are in HeLa cell mitochondria at least 17 distinct tRNA species hybridizable with mitochondrial DNA, which are specific for 16 amino acids. For 14 of the 16 amino acids, amino-acyl-tRNA synthetase activities distinct from the cytoplasmic ones have been detected in mitochondria. The remaining four amino acids (asparagine, glutamine, histidine and proline) have consistently failed to charge to any detectable extent mitochondrial tRNA species hybridizable with mitochondrial DNA.No obvious relationship appears to exist between the amino acids incorporated into tRNAs hybridizable to mitochondrial DNA and the previously observed pattern of chloramphenicol-sensitive amino acid incorporation by HeLa cell mitochondria.     

Recent results on how aminoacyl transfer RNA synthetases recognize specific transfer RNAs

Summary Aminoacyl tRNA synthetases discriminate between tRNA species by a highly specific mechanism. Physical and chemical studies indicate that the synthetases bind along and around the inside of the three-dimensional L-shaped tRNA structure. Studies of mutant tRNAs that affect synthetase interaction tend to confirm this conclusion. However, in contrast to proteins that recognize a specific block of contiguous nucleotide units (e.g., repressors, restriction enzymes, etc.), synthetases appear to interact with spatially disperse elements of the structure. Available evidence suggests that tRNA binding clefts on various synthetases may be roughly similar, with specificity being achieved by the choice of amino acid residues in a few critical positions in the tRNA binding clefts. With this idea in mind, it should be possible to introduce amino acid substitutions into the binding clefts and thereby change tRNA recognition specificity. This has been attempted (by genetic manipulations) and a mutant alanine tRNA synthetase with altered tRNA recognition has been isolated. This enzyme can attach alanine to isoleucine specific tRNA. When presented with valine specific tRNA, a tRNA similar in some structural features to the isoleucine specific tRNA, or with the structurally quite different tyrosine specific tRNA, no significant aminoacylation occurs. Thus, a precise specificity alteration can occur through mutation; this result supports the idea of similarities in synthetase binding clefts, with specificity being achieved by the positioning of amino acids at critical positions in these clefts. Finally, further data have been obtained on the issue of possible transient covalent bond formation between synthetases and tRNAs, as a critical part of the interaction.Abbreviations tRNA^x a tRNA specific for the amino acid - x where x is given the standard 3 letter abbreviation     

MIST,a Novel Approach to Reveal Hidden Substrate Specificity in Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARSs) constitute a family of RNA-binding proteins, that participate in the translation of the genetic code, by covalently linking amino acids to appropriate tRNAs. Due to their fundamental importance for cell life, AARSs are likely to be one of the most ancient families of enzymes and have therefore been characterized extensively. Paradoxically, little is known about their capacity to discriminate tRNAs mainly because of the practical challenges that represent precise and systematic tRNA identification. This work describes a new technical and conceptual approach named MIST (Microarray Identification of Shifted tRNAs) designed to study the formation of tRNA/AARS complexes independently from the aminoacylation reaction. MIST combines electrophoretic mobility shift assays with microarray analyses. Although MIST is a non-cellular assay, it fully integrates the notion of tRNA competition. In this study we focus on yeast cytoplasmic Arginyl-tRNA synthetase (yArgRS) and investigate in depth its ability to discriminate cellular tRNAs. We report that yArgRS in submicromolar concentrations binds cognate and non-cognate tRNAs with a wide range of apparent affinities. In particular, we demonstrate that yArgRS binds preferentially to type II tRNAs but does not support their misaminoacylation. Our results reveal important new trends in tRNA/AARS complex formation and potential deep physiological implications.     

Anticodon sequence mutants of Escherichia coli initiator tRNA: effects of overproduction of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases,methionyl-tRNA formyltransferase,and initiation factor 2 on activity in initiation

Anticodon sequence mutants of Escherichia coli initiator tRNA initiate protein synthesis with codons other than AUG and amino acids other than methionine. Because the anticodon sequence is, in many cases, important for recognition of tRNAs by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, the mutant tRNAs are aminoacylated in vivo with different amino acids. The activity of a mutant tRNA in initiation in vivo depends on (i) the level of expression of the tRNA, (ii) the extent of aminoacylation of the tRNA, (iii) the extent of formylation of the aminoacyl-tRNA to formylaminoacyl-tRNA (fAA-tRNA), and (iv) the affinity of the fAA-tRNA for the initiation factor IF2 and the ribosome. Previously, using E. coli overproducing aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, methionyl-tRNA formyltransferase, or IF2, we identified the steps limiting the activity in initiation of mutant tRNAs aminoacylated with glutamine and valine. Here, we have identified the steps limiting the activity of mutant tRNAs aminoacylated with isoleucine and phenylalanine. The combined results of experiments involving a variety of initiation codons (AUG, UAG, CAG, GUC, AUC, and UUC) provide support to the hypothesis that the ribosome.fAA-tRNA complex can act as an intermediate in initiation of protein synthesis. Comparison of binding affinities of various fAA-tRNAs (fMet-, fGln-, fVal-, fIle-, and fPhe-tRNAs) to IF2 using surface plasmon resonance supports the idea that IF2 can act as a carrier of fAA-tRNA to the ribosome. Other results suggest that the C1xA72 base pair mismatch, unique to eubacterial and organellar initiator tRNAs, may also be important for the binding of fAA-tRNA to IF2.     

Tissue-specific differences in human transfer RNA expression

Over 450 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes have been annotated in the human genome. Reliable quantitation of tRNA levels in human samples using microarray methods presents a technical challenge. We have developed a microarray method to quantify tRNAs based on a fluorescent dye-labeling technique. The first-generation tRNA microarray consists of 42 probes for nuclear encoded tRNAs and 21 probes for mitochondrial encoded tRNAs. These probes cover tRNAs for all 20 amino acids and 11 isoacceptor families. Using this array, we report that the amounts of tRNA within the total cellular RNA vary widely among eight different human tissues. The brain expresses higher overall levels of nuclear encoded tRNAs than every tissue examined but one and higher levels of mitochondrial encoded tRNAs than every tissue examined. We found tissue-specific differences in the expression of individual tRNA species, and tRNAs decoding amino acids with similar chemical properties exhibited coordinated expression in distinct tissue types. Relative tRNA abundance exhibits a statistically significant correlation to the codon usage of a collection of highly expressed, tissue-specific genes in a subset of tissues or tRNA isoacceptors. Our findings demonstrate the existence of tissue-specific expression of tRNA species that strongly implicates a role for tRNA heterogeneity in regulating translation and possibly additional processes in vertebrate organisms.     

Transfer RNA Identity Change in Anticodon Variants of E. coli tRNAPhe in Vivo

The anticodon sequence is a major recognition element for most aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. We investigated the in vivo effects of changing the anticodon on the aminoacylation specificity in the example of E. coli tRNA^Phe. Constructing different anticodon mutants of E. coli tRNA^Phe by site-directed mutagenesis, we isolated 22 anticodon mutant tRNA^Phe; the anticodons corresponded to 16 amino acids and an opal stop codon. To examine whether the mutant tRNAs had changed their amino acid acceptor specificity in vivo, we tested the viability of E. coli strains containing these tRNA^Phe genes in a medium which permitted tRNA induction. Fourteen mutant tRNA genes did not affect host viability. However, eight mutant tRNA genes were toxic to the host and prevented growth, presumably because the anticodon mutants led to translational errors. Many mutant tRNAs which did not affect host viability were not aminoacylated in vivo. Three mutant tRNAs containing anticodon sequences corresponding to lysine (UUU), methionine (CAU) and threonine (UGU) were charged with the amino acid corresponding to their anticodon, but not with phenylalanine. These three tRNAs and tRNA^Phe are located in the same cluster in a sequence similarity dendrogram of total E. coli tRNAs. The results support the idea that such tRNAs arising from in vivo evolution are derived by anticodon change from the same ancestor tRNA.     

Amino acid modifications on tRNA

The accurate formation of cognate aminoacyl-transfer RNAs (aa-tRNAs) is essential for the fidelity of translation. Most amino acids are esterified onto their cognate tRNA isoacceptors directly by aa-tRNA synthetases. However, in the case of four amino acids (Gln, Asn, Cys and Sec), aminoacyl-tRNAs are made through indirect pathways in many organisms across all three domains of life. The process begins with the charging of noncognate amino acids to tRNAs by a specialized synthetase in the case of Cys-tRNA(Cys) formation or by synthetases with relaxed specificity, such as the non-discriminating glutamyl-tRNA, non-discriminating aspartyl-tRNA and seryl-tRNA synthetases. The resulting misacylated tRNAs are then converted to cognate pairs through transformation of the amino acids on the tRNA, which is catalyzed by a group of tRNA-dependent modifying enzymes, such as tRNA-dependent amidotransferases, Sep-tRNA:Cys-tRNA synthase, O-phosphoseryl-tRNA kinase and Sep-tRNA:Sec-tRNA synthase. The majority of these indirect pathways are widely spread in all domains of life and thought to be part of the evolutionary process.     

Binding of misacylated tRNAs to the ribosomal A site

To test whether the ribosome displays specificity for the esterified amino acid and the tRNA body of an aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA), the stabilities of 4 correctly acylated and 12 misacylated tRNAs in the ribosomal A site were determined. By introducing the GAC (valine) anticodon into each tRNA, a constant anticodon.codon interaction was maintained, thus removing concern that different anticodon.codon strengths might affect the binding of the different aa-tRNAs to the A site. Surprisingly, all 16 aa-tRNAs displayed similar dissociation rate constants from the A site. These results suggest that either the ribosome is not specific for different amino acids and tRNA bodies when intact aa-tRNAs are used or the specificity for the amino acid side chain and tRNA body is masked by a conformational change upon aa-tRNA release.     

In vitro selection of tRNAs for efficient four-base decoding to incorporate non-natural amino acids into proteins in an Escherichia coli cell-free translation system

Position-specific incorporation of non-natural amino acids into proteins is a useful technique in protein engineering. In this study, we established a novel selection system to obtain tRNAs that show high decoding activity, from a tRNA library in a cell-free translation system to improve the efficiency of incorporation of non-natural amino acids into proteins. In this system, a puromycin-tRNA conjugate, in which the 3'-terminal A unit was replaced by puromycin, was used. The puromycin-tRNA conjugate was fused to a C-terminus of streptavidin through the puromycin moiety in the ribosome. The streptavidin-puromycin-tRNA fusion molecule was collected and brought to the next round after amplification of the tRNA sequence. We applied this system to select efficient frameshift suppressor tRNAs from a tRNA library with a randomly mutated anticodon loop derived from yeast tRNA CCCG Phe. After three rounds of the selection, we obtained novel frameshift suppressor tRNAs which had high decoding activity and good orthogonality against endogenous aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. These results demonstrate that the in vitro selection system developed here is useful to obtain highly active tRNAs for the incorporation of non-natural amino acid from a tRNA library.     

Studying the evolutionary relationships and phylogenetic trees of 21 groups of tRNA sequences based on complex networks

To find out the evolutionary relationships among different tRNA sequences of 21 amino acids, 22 networks are constructed. One is constructed from whole tRNAs, and the other 21 networks are constructed from the tRNAs which carry the same amino acids. A new method is proposed such that the alignment scores of any two amino acids groups are determined by the average degree and the average clustering coefficient of their networks. The anticodon feature of isolated tRNA and the phylogenetic trees of 21 group networks are discussed. We find that some isolated tRNA sequences in 21 networks still connect with other tRNAs outside their group, which reflects the fact that those tRNAs might evolve by intercrossing among these 21 groups. We also find that most anticodons among the same cluster are only one base different in the same sites when S ≥ 70, and they stay in the same rank in the ladder of evolutionary relationships. Those observations seem to agree on that some tRNAs might mutate from the same ancestor sequences based on point mutation mechanisms.     

A unique serine-specific elongation factor Tu found in nematode mitochondria

The translation elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) delivers aminoacyl-tRNAs to ribosomes by recognizing the tRNA acceptor and T stems. However, the unusual truncation observed in some animal mitochondrial tRNAs seems to prevent recognition by a canonical EF-Tu. For instance, nematode mitochondria contain tRNAs lacking a T or D arm. We recently found an atypical EF-Tu (EF-Tu1) specific for nematode mitochondrial tRNAs that lack the T arm. We have now discovered a second factor, EF-Tu2, which binds only to tRNAs that lack a D arm. EF-Tu2 seems unique in its amino acid specificity because it recognizes the aminoacyl moiety of seryl-tRNAs and the tRNA structure itself. Such EF-Tu evolution might explain tRNA structural divergence in animal mitochondria.     

Distinct tRNA recognition strategies used by a homologous family of editing domains prevent mistranslation

Errors in protein synthesis due to mispairing of amino acids with tRNAs jeopardize cell viability. Several checkpoints to prevent formation of Ala- and Cys-tRNA^Pro have been described, including the Ala-specific editing domain (INS) of most bacterial prolyl-tRNA synthetases (ProRSs) and an autonomous single-domain INS homolog, YbaK, which clears Cys-tRNA^Pro in trans. In many species where ProRS lacks an INS domain, ProXp-ala, another single-domain INS-like protein, is responsible for editing Ala-tRNA^Pro. Although the amino acid specificity of these editing domains has been established, the role of tRNA sequence elements in substrate selection has not been investigated in detail. Critical recognition elements for aminoacylation by bacterial ProRS include acceptor stem elements G72/A73 and anticodon bases G35/G36. Here, we show that ProXp-ala and INS require these same acceptor stem and anticodon elements, respectively, whereas YbaK lacks inherent tRNA specificity. Thus, these three related domains use divergent approaches to recognize tRNAs and prevent mistranslation. Whereas some editing domains have borrowed aspects of tRNA recognition from the parent aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase, relaxed tRNA specificity leading to semi-promiscuous editing may offer advantages to cells.     

The role of initiator tRNAimet in fidelity of initiation of protein synthesis

The proper arrangement of amino acids in a protein determines its proper function, which is vital for the cellular metabolism. This indicates that the process of peptide bond formation requires high fidelity. One of the most important processes for this fidelity is kinetic proofreading. As biochemical experiments suggest that kinetic proofreading plays a major role in ensuring the fidelity of protein synthesis, it is not certain whether or not a misacylated tRNA would be corrected by kinetic proofreading during the peptide bond formation. Using 2-layered ONIOM (QM/MM) computational calculations, we studied the behavior of misacylated tRNAs and compared the results with these for cognate aminoacyl-tRNAs during the process of peptide bond formation to investigate the effect of nonnative amino acids on tRNAs. The difference between the behavior of initiator tRNA(i) (met) compared to the one for the elongator tRNAs indicates that only the initiator tRNA(i) (met) specifies the amino acid side chain.     

Chromatographic Analyses of Isoaccepting tRNAs from Avian Myeloblastosis Virus

Avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV) 4S RNA was tested for amino acid acceptor activity for 18 of the 20 amino acids. A nonrandom distribution of viral tRNAs was found compared with tRNA from normal liver or from AMV-infected leukemic myeloblasts, confirming previous reports. Methionine and proline tRNAs were considerably enriched, whereas glutamic acid, glutamine, serine, tyrosine, and valine tRNAs were markedly depleted in AMV relative to homologous cellular tRNAs. The seven AMV tRNAs with the greatest amino acid acceptance capacities, which were in order methionine, proline, lysine, arginine, histidine, isoleucine, and threonine tRNAs, were compared with homologous tRNAs from leukemic myeloblasts and liver by reversed-phase 5 chromatography. Of the 25 isoaccepting chromatographic fractions identified, no tRNA species unique to AMV was detected. Only methionyl-tRNA showed a substantial quantitative variation in isoaccepting species compared with the host cell. Thus, viral selectivity for amino acid-specific tRNAs is not, generally, paralleled by selectivity for individual isoaccepting tRNA species. Qualitative differences in arginyl- and histidyl-tRNA isoaccepting species were discovered in virus and leukemic myeloblasts compared with liver. This indicates the existence of structural differences in these tRNA species which could be related to virus replication or expression.