Functional analysis of promoters involved in quorum sensing-based regulation of bacteriocin production in Lactobacillus

Bacteriocin production in Lactobacillus sake LTH673 involves at least four operons: a regulatory operon (sppIPKR); two operons encoding bacteriocins and their immunity proteins (sppAiA and orfX); and an operon needed for secretion (sppTE). We show here that the response regulator encoded by sppR in L. sake LTH673, as well as the homologous response regulators encoded by plnC and plnD in Lactobacillus plantarum C11, bind to characteristic repeats found in the -80 to -40 regions of spp operons. The promoters controlling bacteriocin operons are strictly regulated, and their activity is increased more than 1000-fold upon activation. Constitutive expression for the regulatory and transport operons is driven, at least in part, by promoters upstream of the -80 to -40 regions. Peak promoter activity of the regulatory and transporter operons precedes that of the two bacteriocin operons. The results reveal how promoters involved in quorum sensing-based regulation of bacteriocin production in Lactobacillus differ in strength, leakiness and timing of their activity.     

Inducible bacteriocin production in Lactobacillus is regulated by differential expression of the pln operons and by two antagonizing response regulators,the activity of which is enhanced upon phosphorylation

Expression of the five (pln) operons involved in the bacteriocin production of Lactobacillus plantarum C11 is regulated by a so-called pheromone-based signal-transducing network, in which the peptide pheromone (PlnA) induces bacteriocin production through the action of a histidine protein kinase (PlnB) and two antagonizing response regulators (PlnC as an activator and PlnD as a negative regulator). All pln-regulated promoters contain a conserved pair of direct repeats that serve as binding sites for PlnC and PlnD. In the present work, we show that the five PlnA-responsive operons are differentially expressed with regard to both timing and strength, and that the pheromone triggers a strong autoactivating loop of the regulatory unit (plnABCD) during an early stage of induction that gradually leads to enhanced activation of the other operons. The transport operon (plnGHSTUV), which is involved in the secretion of the pheromone and bacteriocins, is also expressed relatively early upon induction, but is quickly turned off soon after peak expression. Further investigation of the various promoters revealed that, although subtle differences within the promoter regions could account for the observed differential regulation, the presence of a downstream promoter-proximal sequence in one promoter was found to cause delayed peak activity. How phosphorylation regulates the activity of the pln response regulators was also accessed by direct mutagenesis at their phosphorylation sites. It was found that the two response regulators exert activity at two different levels: a low level when they are not phosphorylated and an elevated level when they are phosphorylated. The present data demonstrate that bacteriocin production in L. plantarum C11 is a highly regulated process, in which different regulatory mechanisms are applied to fine tune the timing and strength of expression of the five pln operons.     

Quorum-sensing regulation of gene expression: Fundamental and applied aspects and the role in bacterial communication

Quorum sensing (QS) is a specific type of regulation of gene expression in bacteria; it is dependent on the population density. QS systems include two obligate components: a low-molecular-weight regulator (autoinducer), readily diffusible through the cytoplasmic membrane, and a regulatory receptor protein, which interacts with the regulator. As the bacterial population reaches a critical level of density, autoinducers accumulate to a necessary threshold value and abrupt activation (induction) of certain genes and operons occurs. By means of low-molecular-weight regulators, bacteria accomplish communication between cells belonging to the same or different species, genera, and even families. QS systems have been shown to play a key role in the regulation of various metabolic processes in bacteria and to function as global regulators of the expression of bacterial genes. Data are presented on different types of QS systems present in bacteria of various taxonomic groups, on the species specificity of these systems, and on communication of bacteria by means of QS systems. The possibility is considered of using QS regulation systems as targets while combating bacterial infections; other applied aspects of QS investigation are discussed.     

Quorum-sensing regulation of gene expression: fundamental and applied aspects and the role in bacterial communication

Quorum sensing (QS) is a specific type of regulation of gene expression in bacteria; it is dependent on the population density. QS systems include two obligate components: a low-molecular-weight regulator (autoinducer), readily diffusible through the cytoplasmic membrane, and a regulatory receptor protein, which interacts with the regulator. As the bacterial population reaches a critical level of density, autoinducers accumulate to a necessary threshold value and abrupt activation (induction) of certain genes and operons occurs. By means of low-molecular-weight regulators, bacteria accomplish communication between cells belonging to the same or different species, genera, and even families. QS systems have been shown to play a key role in the regulation of various metabolic processes in bacteria and to function as global regulators of the expression of bacterial genes. Data are presented on different types of QS systems present in bacteria of various taxonomic groups, on the species specificity of these systems, and on communication of bacteria by means of QS systems. The possibility is considered of using QS regulation systems as targets while combating bacterial infections; other applied aspects of QS investigation are discussed.     

Genetic mechanisms of bacilli adaptation

Adaptive strategies of bacilli involving genetic regulatory mechanisms are reviewed. The role of master regulators and signal transduction systems that coordinate the interaction of the extracellular signals and the genetic programs responsible for the metabolic state of bacteria are discussed. Most of the known regulatory pathways are directly or indirectly regulated by the DegU, Spo0A, AbrB, and CodY global regulators. The main factor affecting the development of cell phenotype is the concentration of the regulatory protein and its ability to bind with varying affinity to promoters of the genes and operons. The effect of the regulatory systems on the bistability of microbial populations is discussed.     

Identification of the DNA-binding sites for two response regulators involved in control of bacteriocin synthesis in Lactobacillus plantarum C11

In Lactobacillus plantarum C11, bacteriocin production has previously been shown to be an inducible process, in which a secreted peptide, produced by the host itself, is involved. The inducing factor, designated plantaricin A (PlnA), is a bacteriocin-like peptide encoded by a gene (plnA) located on the same operon as the genes for a two-component regulatory system (plnBCD). This system consists of a histidine kinase (PlnB) and two response regulators (PlnC,D), and belongs to a recently defined subfamily of two-component regulatory systems, which are activated by secreted peptide pheromones through a quorum-sensing mechanism. We show here that the two response regulators PlnC and PlnD bind specifically to imperfect direct repeats found within the adjacent promoter of the plnABCD operon, and to similar sequences found within the promoter regions of two nearby operons containing bacteriocin structural genes (plnEFI and plnJKLR). Binding of PlnC and PlnD was increased two to three fold in the presence of acetyl phosphate. The results suggest that bacteriocin synthesis in L. plantarum C11 is regulated by the DNA-binding activity of the two response regulators PlnC and PlnD.

     

Identification of the DNA-binding sites for two response regulators involved in control of bacteriocin synthesis in Lactobacillus plantarum C11

In Lactobacillus plantarum C11, bacteriocin production has previously been shown to be an inducible process, in which a secreted peptide, produced by the host itself, is involved. The inducing factor, designated plantaricin A (PlnA), is a bacteriocin-like peptide encoded by a gene (plnA) located on the same operon as the genes for a two-component regulatory system (plnBCD). This system consists of a histidine kinase (PlnB) and two response regulators (PlnC,D), and belongs to a recently defined subfamily of two-component regulatory systems, which are activated by secreted peptide pheromones through a quorum-sensing mechanism. We show here that the two response regulators PlnC and PlnD bind specifically to imperfect direct repeats found within the adjacent promoter of the plnABCD operon, and to similar sequences found within the promoter regions of two nearby operons containing bacteriocin structural genes (plnEFI and plnJKLR). Binding of PlnC and PlnD was increased two to three fold in the presence of acetyl phosphate. The results suggest that bacteriocin synthesis in L. plantarum C11 is regulated by the DNA-binding activity of the two response regulators PlnC and PlnD. Received: 21 January 1998 / Accepted: 28 April 1998     

Bacterial regulatory networks include direct contact of response regulator proteins: interaction of RegA and NtrX in Rhodobacter capsulatus

The formation of photosynthetic complexes in facultatively photosynthetic bacteria is controlled by the oxygen tension in the environment. In Rhodobacter capsulatus the two-component system RegB/RegA plays a major role in the redox control of photosynthesis genes but also controls other redox-dependent systems. The response regulator RegA is phosphorylated under low oxygen tension and activates the puf and puc operons, which encode pigment binding proteins, by binding to their promoter regions. Data from a yeast two-hybrid analysis as well as an in vitroanalysis indicate that RegA interacts with the NtrX protein, the response regulator of the NtrY/NtrX two-component system which is believed to be involved in regulation of nitrogen fixation genes. Our further analysis revealed that NtrX is indeed involved in the regulation of the puf and puc operons. Furthermore, we showed that an altered NtrX protein, which is predicted to adopt the conformation of phosphorylated NtrX protein, binds within the puf promoter region close to the RegA binding sites. We conclude that a direct interaction of two response regulators connects the regulatory systems for redox control and nitrogen control.