CHD4在染色体重塑中的作用

染色质作为真核细胞遗传信息,体内外各种因素的作用致使不断的产生损伤,但是细胞仍能保持正常的生长、分裂和繁殖,这与基因组稳定性和完整性保持,并且通过自身的损伤修复有着密切的联系。ATP依赖的染色质重塑是染色质重塑的最重要的方式之一,主要是利用ATP水解释放的能量,将凝聚的异染色质打开,协调损伤修复蛋白与DNA损伤位点的作用,通过对组蛋白的共价键修饰或ATP依赖的染色质重塑复合物开启了DNA的损伤修复的大门。CHD4/Mi-2β的类SWI2/SNF2 ATP酶/解螺旋酶域结构域保守性最强,这一结构域存在与多种依赖于ATP的核小体重构复合物。Mi-2蛋白复合物称为核小体重塑及去乙酰化酶NuRd(nucleoside remodeling and deacetylase,NuRD),是个多亚基蛋白复合物,Mi2β/CHD4是该复合物的核心成员。近来的研究发现,CHD4具有染色质重塑功能,并且参与DNA损伤修复的调控。CHD4羧基端的PHD通过乙酰化或甲基化识别组蛋白H3氨基端Lys9(H3K9ac和H3K9me),并且通过Lys4甲基化(H3K4me)或Ala1乙酰化(H3A Lac)抑制与H3、H4的结合,为染色质重塑提供了保障。Mi-2β/CHD4参与DNA损伤反应,定位于DNA损伤γ-H2AX的foci。沉默Mi-2β/CHD4基因,细胞自发性DNA损伤增多和辐射敏感性增强。表明CHD4在染色质重塑中具有重要的作用。     

Adenosine induces G2/M cell‐cycle arrest by inhibiting cell mitosis progression

Cellular adenosine accumulates under stress conditions. Few papers on adenosine are concerned with its function in the cell cycle. The cell cycle is the essential mechanism by which all living things reproduce and the target machinery when cells encounter stresses, so it is necessary to examine the relationship between adenosine and the cell cycle. In the present study, adenosine was found to induce G₂/M cell‐cycle arrest. Furthermore, adenosine was found to modulate the expression of some important proteins in the cell cycle, such as cyclin B and p21, and to inhibit the transition of metaphase to anaphase in mitosis.     

DNA damage signaling triggers the cytoplasm-to-vacuole pathway of autophagy to regulate cell cycle progression

Budding yeast cells suffering a single unrepaired DNA double-strand break (DSB) trigger the ATR (Mec1)-dependent DNA damage checkpoint and arrest prior to anaphase for 12–15 h, following which they adapt and resume cell division. When the DNA lesion can be repaired, the checkpoint is extinguished and cells “recover” and resume mitosis. In this autophagic punctum, we report that hyperactivation of autophagy—specifically via the cytoplasm-to-vacuole targeting (Cvt) pathway—prevents both adaptation to, and recovery from, DNA damage, resulting in the permanent arrest of cells in G₂/M. We show that Saccharomyces cerevisiae deleted for genes encoding the Golgi-associated retrograde protein transport (GARP) complex are both adaptation- and recovery-defective. GARP mutants such as vps51Δ exhibit mislocalization of the key mitotic regulator, securin (Pds1), and its degradation by the vacuolar protease Prb1. In addition, separase (Esp1), is excluded from the nucleus, accounting for pre-anaphase arrest. Pds1 is degraded via the Cvt pathway. Many of the same defects seen by deleting GARP genes can be mimicked by hyperactivation of the Cvt pathway by overexpressing an unphosphorylatable form of ATG13 or by adding the TORC1 inhibitor rapamycin. These results suggest that nuclear events such as DNA damage can have profound effects on cytoplasmic processes and further expand the burgeoning connections between DNA damage and autophagy.     

Distinct roles of ATR and DNA‐PKcs in triggering DNA damage responses in ATM‐deficient cells

The cellular response to DNA double‐strand breaks involves direct activation of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and indirect activation of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) in an ATM/Mre11/cell‐cycle‐dependent manner. Here, we report that the crucial checkpoint signalling proteins—p53, structural maintainance of chromosomes 1 (SMC1), p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1), checkpoint kinase (Chk)1 and Chk2—are phosphorylated rapidly by ATR in an ATM/Mre11/cell‐cycle‐independent manner, albeit at low levels. We observed the sequential recruitment of replication protein A (RPA) and ATR to the sites of DNA damage in ATM‐deficient cells, which provides a mechanistic basis for the observed phosphorylations. The recruitment of ATR and consequent phosphorylations do not require Mre11 but are dependent on Exo1. We show that these low levels of phosphorylation are biologically important, as ATM‐deficient cells enforce an early G2/M checkpoint that is ATR‐dependent. ATR is also essential for the late G2 accumulation that is peculiar to irradiated ATM‐deficient cells. Interestingly, phosphorylation of KRAB associated protein 1 (KAP‐1), a protein involved in chromatin remodelling, is mediated by DNA‐dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA‐PKcs) in a spatio‐temporal manner in addition to ATM. We posit that ATM substrates involved in cell‐cycle checkpoint signalling can be minimally phosphorylated independently by ATR, while a small subset of proteins involved in chromatin remodelling are phosphorylated by DNA‐PKcs in addition to ATM.     

Enforcing temporal control of maternal mRNA translation during oocyte cell‐cycle progression

Meiotic cell‐cycle progression in progesterone‐stimulated Xenopus oocytes requires that the translation of pre‐existing maternal mRNAs occur in a strict temporal order. Timing of translation is regulated through elements within the mRNA 3′ untranslated region (3′ UTR), which respond to cell cycle‐dependant signalling. One element that has been previously implicated in the temporal control of mRNA translation is the cytoplasmic polyadenylation element (CPE). In this study, we show that the CPE does not direct early mRNA translation. Rather, early translation is directed through specific early factors, including the Musashi‐binding element (MBE) and the MBE‐binding protein, Musashi. Our findings indicate that although the cyclin B5 3′ UTR contains both CPEs and an MBE, the MBE is the critical regulator of early translation. The cyclin B2 3′ UTR contains CPEs, but lacks an MBE and is translationally activated late in maturation. Finally, utilizing antisense oligonucleotides to attenuate endogenous Musashi synthesis, we show that Musashi is critical for the initiation of early class mRNA translation and for the subsequent activation of CPE‐dependant mRNA translation.     

Polyamines may regulate S-phase progression but not the dynamic changes of chromatin during the cell cycle

Several studies suggest that polyamines may stabilize chromatin and play a role in its structural alterations. In line with this idea, we found here by chromatin precipitation and micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digestion analyses, that spermidine and spermine stabilize or condense the nucleosomal organization of chromatin in vitro. We then investigated the possible physiological role of polyamines in the nucleosomal organization of chromatin during the cell cycle in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells deficient in ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) activity. An extended polyamine deprivation (for 4 days) was found to arrest 70% of the odc⁻ cells in S phase. MNase digestion analyses revealed that these cells have a highly loosened and destabilized nucleosomal organization. However, no marked difference in the chromatin structure was detected between the control and polyamine-depleted cells following the synchronization of the cells at the S-phase. We also show in synchronized cells that polyamine deprivation retards the traverse of the cells through the S phase already in the first cell cycle. Depletion of polyamines had no significant effect on the nucleosomal organization of chromatin in G₁–early S. The polyamine-deprived cells were also capable of condensing the nucleosomal organization of chromatin in the S/G₂ phase of the cell cycle. These data indicate that polyamines do not regulate the chromatin condensation state during the cell cycle, although they might have some stabilizing effect on the chromatin structure. Polyamines may, however, play an important role in the control of S-phase progression. J. Cell Biochem. 68:200–212, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Loss of CHD1 causes DNA repair defects and enhances prostate cancer therapeutic responsiveness

The CHD1 gene, encoding the chromo‐domain helicase DNA‐binding protein‐1, is one of the most frequently deleted genes in prostate cancer. Here, we examined the role of CHD1 in DNA double‐strand break (DSB) repair in prostate cancer cells. We show that CHD1 is required for the recruitment of CtIP to chromatin and subsequent end resection during DNA DSB repair. Our data support a role for CHD1 in opening the chromatin around the DSB to facilitate the recruitment of homologous recombination (HR) proteins. Consequently, depletion of CHD1 specifically affects HR‐mediated DNA repair but not non‐homologous end joining. Together, we provide evidence for a previously unknown role of CHD1 in DNA DSB repair via HR and show that CHD1 depletion sensitizes cells to PARP inhibitors, which has potential therapeutic relevance. Our findings suggest that CHD1 deletion, like BRCA1/2 mutation in ovarian cancer, may serve as a marker for prostate cancer patient stratification and the utilization of targeted therapies such as PARP inhibitors, which specifically target tumors with HR defects.     

APC/CCdh1 controls CtIP stability during the cell cycle and in response to DNA damage

Human cells have evolved elaborate mechanisms for responding to DNA damage to maintain genome stability and prevent carcinogenesis. For instance, the cell cycle can be arrested at different stages to allow time for DNA repair. The APC/C^Cdh1 ubiquitin ligase mainly regulates mitotic exit but is also implicated in the DNA damage‐induced G₂ arrest. However, it is currently unknown whether APC/C^Cdh1 also contributes to DNA repair. Here, we show that Cdh1 depletion causes increased levels of genomic instability and enhanced sensitivity to DNA‐damaging agents. Using an integrated proteomics and bioinformatics approach, we identify CtIP, a DNA‐end resection factor, as a novel APC/C^Cdh1 target. CtIP interacts with Cdh1 through a conserved KEN box, mutation of which impedes ubiquitylation and downregulation of CtIP both during G₁ and after DNA damage in G₂. Finally, we find that abrogating the CtIP–Cdh1 interaction results in delayed CtIP clearance from DNA damage foci, increased DNA‐end resection, and reduced homologous recombination efficiency. Combined, our results highlight the impact of APC/C^Cdh1 on the maintenance of genome integrity and show that this is, at least partially, achieved by controlling CtIP stability in a cell cycle‐ and DNA damage‐dependent manner.     

Increased tRNA modification and gene-specific codon usage regulate cell cycle progression during the DNA damage response

S-phase and DNA damage promote increased ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) activity. Translation of RNR1 has been linked to the wobble uridine modifying enzyme tRNA methyltransferase 9 (Trm9). We predicted that changes in tRNA modification would translationally regulate RNR1 after DNA damage to promote cell cycle progression. In support, we demonstrate that the Trm9-dependent tRNA modification 5-methoxycarbonylmethyluridine (mcm?U) is increased in hydroxyurea (HU)-induced S-phase cells, relative to G? and G?, and that mcm?U is one of 16 tRNA modifications whose levels oscillate during the cell cycle. Codon-reporter data matches the mcm?U increase to Trm9 and the efficient translation of AGA codons and RNR1. Further, we show that in trm9Δ cells reduced Rnr1 protein levels cause delayed transition into S-phase after damage. Codon re-engineering of RNR1 increased the number of trm9Δ cells that have transitioned into S-phase 1 h after DNA damage and that have increased Rnr1 protein levels, similar to that of wild-type cells expressing native RNR1. Our data supports a model in which codon usage and tRNA modification are regulatory components of the DNA damage response, with both playing vital roles in cell cycle progression.     

Increased tRNA modification and gene-specific codon usage regulate cell cycle progression during the DNA damage response

S-phase and DNA damage promote increased ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) activity. Translation of RNR1 has been linked to the wobble uridine modifying enzyme tRNA methyltransferase 9 (Trm9). We predicted that changes in tRNA modification would translationally regulate RNR1 after DNA damage to promote cell cycle progression. In support, we demonstrate that the Trm9-dependent tRNA modification 5-methoxycarbonylmethyluridine (mcm⁵U) is increased in hydroxyurea (HU)-induced S-phase cells, relative to G₁ and G₂, and that mcm⁵U is one of 16 tRNA modifications whose levels oscillate during the cell cycle. Codon-reporter data matches the mcm⁵U increase to Trm9 and the efficient translation of AGA codons and RNR1. Further, we show that in trm9Δ cells reduced Rnr1 protein levels cause delayed transition into S-phase after damage. Codon re-engineering of RNR1 increased the number of trm9Δ cells that have transitioned into S-phase 1 h after DNA damage and that have increased Rnr1 protein levels, similar to that of wild-type cells expressing native RNR1. Our data supports a model in which codon usage and tRNA modification are regulatory components of the DNA damage response, with both playing vital roles in cell cycle progression.     

ATM-dependent chromatin remodeler Rsf-1 facilitates DNA damage checkpoints and homologous recombination repair

As a member of imitation switch (ISWI) family in ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors, RSF complex consists of SNF2h ATPase and Rsf-1. Although it has been reported that SNF2h ATPase is recruited to DNA damage sites (DSBs) in a poly(ADP-ribosyl) polymerase 1 (PARP1)-dependent manner in DNA damage response (DDR), the function of Rsf-1 is still elusive. Here we show that Rsf-1 is recruited to DSBs confirmed by various cellular analyses. Moreover, the initial recruitment of Rsf-1 and SNF2h to DSBs shows faster kinetics than that of γH2AX after micro-irradiation. Signals of Rsf-1 and SNF2h are retained over 30 min after micro-irradiation, whereas γH2AX signals are gradually reduced at 10 min. In addition, Rsf-1 is accumulated at DSBs in ATM-dependent manner, and the putative pSQ motifs of Rsf-1 by ATM are required for its accumulation at DSBs. Furtheremore, depletion of Rsf-1 attenuates the activation of DNA damage checkpoint signals and cell survival upon DNA damage. Finally, we demonstrate that Rsf-1 promotes homologous recombination repair (HRR) by recruiting resection factors RPA32 and Rad51. Thus, these findings reveal a new function of chromatin remodeler Rsf-1 as a guard in DNA damage checkpoints and homologous recombination repair.