The ATPase and helicase activities of Prp43p are stimulated by the G‐patch protein Pfa1p during yeast ribosome biogenesis

Prp43p is a RNA helicase required for pre‐mRNA splicing and for the synthesis of large and small ribosomal subunits. The molecular functions and modes of regulation of Prp43p during ribosome biogenesis remain unknown. We demonstrate that the G‐patch protein Pfa1p, a component of pre‐40S pre‐ribosomal particles, directly interacts with Prp43p. We also show that lack of Gno1p, another G‐patch protein associated with Prp43p, specifically reduces Pfa1p accumulation, whereas it increases the levels of the pre‐40S pre‐ribosomal particle component Ltv1p. Moreover, cells lacking Pfa1p and depleted for Ltv1p show strong 20S pre‐rRNA accumulation in the cytoplasm and reduced levels of 18S rRNA. Finally, we demonstrate that Pfa1p stimulates the ATPase and helicase activities of Prp43p. Truncated Pfa1p variants unable to fully stimulate the activity of Prp43p fail to complement the 20S pre‐rRNA processing defect of Δpfa1 cells depleted for Ltv1p. Our results strongly suggest that stimulation of ATPase/helicase activities of Prp43p by Pfa1p is required for efficient 20S pre‐rRNA‐to‐18S rRNA conversion.     

DbpA is a region‐specific RNA helicase

DbpA is a DEAD‐box RNA helicase implicated in RNA structural rearrangements in the peptidyl transferase center. DbpA contains an RNA binding domain, responsible for tight binding of DbpA to hairpin 92 of 23S ribosomal RNA, and a RecA‐like catalytic core responsible for double‐helix unwinding. It is not known if DbpA unwinds only the RNA helices that are part of a specific RNA structure, or if DbpA unwinds any RNA helices within the catalytic core's grasp. In other words, it is not known if DbpA is a site‐specific enzyme or region‐specific enzyme. In this study, we used protein and RNA engineering to investigate if DbpA is a region‐specific or a site‐specific enzyme. Our data suggest that DbpA is a region‐specific enzyme. This conclusion has an important implication for the physiological role of DbpA. It suggests that during ribosome assembly, DbpA could bind with its C‐terminal RNA binding domain to hairpin 92, while its catalytic core may unwind any double‐helices in its vicinity. The only requirement for a double‐helix to serve as a DbpA substrate is for the double‐helix to be positioned within the catalytic core's grasp.     

The acidic domain is a unique structural feature of the splicing factor SYNCRIP

The splicing factor SYNCRIP (hnRNP Q) is involved in viral replication, neural morphogenesis, modulation of circadian oscillation, and the regulation of the cytidine deaminase APOBEC1. It consists of three globular RNA‐recognition motifs (RRM) domains flanked by an N‐terminal acid‐rich acidic sequence segment domain (AcD_12–97) and a C‐terminal domain containing an arginine–glycine‐rich sequence motif (RGG/RXG box), which are located near to the N‐ and C‐terminals, respectively. The acid‐rich sequence segment is unique to SYNCRIP and the closely related protein hnRNP R, and is involved in interactions with APOBEC1. Here, we show that while AcD_12–97 does not form a globular domain, structure‐based annotation identified a self‐folding globular domain with an all α‐helix architecture, AcD_24–107. The NMR structure of AcD_24?107 is fundamentally different from previously reported AcD molecular models. In addition to negatively charged surface areas, it contains a large hydrophobic cavity and a positively charged surface area as potential epitopes for intermolecular interactions.     

Solvent-exposed residues located in the beta-sheet modulate the stability of the tetramerization domain of p53--a structural and combinatorial approach

The role of hydrophobic amino acids in the formation of hydrophobic cores as one of the major driving forces in protein folding has been extensively studied. However, the implication of neutral solvent-exposed amino acids is less clear and available information is scarce. We have used a combinatorial approach to study the structural relevance of three solvent-exposed residues (Tyr(327), Thr(329), and Gln(331)) located in thebeta-sheet of the tetramerization domain of the tumor suppressor p53 (p53TD). A conformationally defined peptide library was designed where these three positions were randomized. The library was screened for tetramer stability. A set of p53TD mutants containing putative stabilizing or destabilizing residue combinations was synthesized for a thermodynamic characterization. Unfolding experiments showed a wide range of stabilities, with T(m) values between 27 and 83 degrees C. Wild type p53TD and some highly destabilized and stabilized mutants were further characterized. Thermodynamic and biophysical data indicated that these proteins were folded tetramers, with the same overall structure, in equilibrium with unfolded monomers. An NMR study confirmed that the main structural features of p53TD are conserved in all the mutants analyzed. The thermodynamic stability of the different p53TD mutants showed a strong correlation with parameters that favor formation and stabilization of the beta-sheet. We propose that stabilization through hydrophobic interactions of key secondary structure elements might be the underlying mechanism for the strong influence of solvent-exposed residues in the stability of p53TD.     

SOT1, a pentatricopeptide repeat protein with a small MutS‐related domain,is required for correct processing of plastid 23S–4.5S rRNA precursors in Arabidopsis thaliana

Ribosomal RNA processing is essential for plastid ribosome biogenesis, but is still poorly understood in higher plants. Here, we show that SUPPRESSOR OF THYLAKOID FORMATION1 (SOT1), a plastid‐localized pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein with a small MutS‐related domain, is required for maturation of the 23S–4.5S rRNA dicistron. Loss of SOT1 function leads to slower chloroplast development, suppression of leaf variegation, and abnormal 23S and 4.5S processing. Predictions based on the PPR motif sequences identified the 5′ end of the 23S–4.5S rRNA dicistronic precursor as a putative SOT1 binding site. This was confirmed by electrophoretic mobility shift assay, and by loss of the abundant small RNA ‘footprint’ associated with this site in sot1 mutants. We found that more than half of the 23S–4.5S rRNA dicistrons in sot1 mutants contain eroded and/or unprocessed 5′ and 3′ ends, and that the endonucleolytic cleavage product normally released from the 5′ end of the precursor is absent in a sot1 null mutant. We postulate that SOT1 binding protects the 5′ extremity of the 23S–4.5S rRNA dicistron from exonucleolytic attack, and favours formation of the RNA structure that allows endonucleolytic processing of its 5′ and 3′ ends.