Effects of perceived patient demand on prescribing anti-infective drugs

BACKGROUND: Although patient demand is frequently cited by physicians as a reason for inappropriate prescribing, the phenomenon has not been adequately studied. The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of perceived patient demand in physician-patient encounters; to identify characteristics of the patient, physician and prescribing situation that are associated with perceived demand; and to determine the influence of perceived demand on physicians'' prescribing behaviour. METHODS: An observational study using 2 survey approaches was conducted in February and March 1996. Over a 2-day period 20 family physicians in the Toronto area completed a brief questionnaire for each patient encounter related to suspected infectious disease. Physicians were later asked in an interview to select and describe 1 or 2 incidents from these encounters during which perceived patient demand influenced their prescribing (critical incident technique). RESULTS: Perceived patient demand was reported in 124 (48%) of the 260 physician-patient encounters; however, in almost 80% of these encounters physicians did not think that the demand had much influence on their decision to prescribe an anti-infective. When clinical need was uncertain, 28 (82%) of 34 patients seeking an anti-infective were prescribed one, and physicians reported that they were influenced either "moderately" or "quite a bit" by perceived patient demand in over 50% of these cases. Of the 35 critical prescribing incidents identified during the interviews, anti-infectives were prescribed in 17 (49%); the reasons for prescribing in these situations were categorized. INTERPRETATION: This study provides preliminary data on the prevalence and influence of perceived patient demand in prescribing anti-infectives. Patient demand had more influence on prescribing when physicians were uncertain of the need for an anti-infective.     

Factors associated with the use of evidence-based therapies after discharge among elderly patients with myocardial infarction

Background

In an accompanying article, we report moderate between-hospital variation in the postdischarge use of β-blockers, angiotensin-modifying drugs and statins by elderly patients who had been admitted to hospital with acute myocardial infarction. Our objective was to identify the characteristics of patients, physicians, hospitals and communities associated with differences in the use of these medications after discharge.

Methods

For this retrospective, population-based cohort study, we used linked administrative databases. We examined data for all patients aged 65 years or older who were discharged from hospital in 2005/06 with a diagnosis of myocardial infarction. We determined the effect of patient, physician, hospital and community characteristics on the rate of postdischarge medication use.

Results

Increasing patient age was associated with lower postdischarge use of medications. The odds ratios (ORs) for a 1-year increase in age were 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97–0.99) for β-blockers, 0.97 (95% CI 0.97–0.98) for angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers and 0.94 (95% CI 0.93–0.95) for statins. Having a general or family practitioner, a general internist or a physician of another specialty as the attending physician, relative to having a cardiologist, was associated with lower postdischarge use of β-blockers, angiotensin-modifying agents and statins (ORs ranging from 0.46 to 0.82). Having an attending physician with 29 or more years experience, relative to having a physician who had graduated within the past 15 years, was associated with lower use of β-blockers (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.60–0.84) and statins (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67–0.97).

Interpretation

Patients who received care from noncardiologists and physicians with at least 29 years of experience had substantially lower use of evidence-based drug therapies after discharge. Dissemination strategies should be devised to improve the prescribing of evidence-based medications by these physicians.The use of medications such as acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), β-blockers, angiotensin-modifying drugs (angiotensin-converting-enzyme [ACE] inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers) and statins is a mainstay of secondary prevention of myocardial infarction. In a companion study published in this issue of CMAJ, we report substantial increases in the use of evidence-based drug therapies after discharge among elderly patients with myocardial infarction over a 14-year period.¹ However, despite temporal improvements, the prescribing of evidence-based drug therapies differed among hospitals in 2005.Studies from the late 1980s to the mid-1990s showed that the prescribing of evidence-based drug therapies was influenced by patient characteristics.^2–6 However, the extent to which postdischarge prescribing is influenced by patient, physician, hospital and community characteristics has not been extensively explored.Our objective was to identify patient, physician, hospital and community characteristics associated with the use of of evidence-based drug therapies after discharge among patients with myocardial infarction.     

Association of Daily Growth Hormone Injection Adherence and Height Among Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency

ObjectiveRecombinant human growth hormone (somatropin) is recommended for children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) to normalize adult height. Prior research has indicated an association between adherence to somatropin and height velocity. Further research is needed using real-world data to quantify this relationship; hence the objective of this study was to investigate the association between adherence to somatropin and change in height among children with GHD.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients in the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus and Ambulatory Electronic Medical Records databases aged 3 to 15 years, with ≥1 GHD diagnosis code claim and newly initiated on somatropin between January 1, 2007 and November 30, 2019. Adherence was measured over the follow-up using the medication possession ratio (MPR); patients were classified as adherent (MPR ≥ 0.8) or nonadherent (MPR < 0.8).ResultsAmong 201 patients initiated on somatropin, 74.6% were male, mean age was 11.4 years, and the mean follow-up was 343.3 days. Approximately 76.6% of patients were adherent to somatropin over the follow-up period. Adjusted growth trajectories were similar between adherent and nonadherent patients pre-treatment initiation (P = .15). Growth trajectories post-initiation were significantly different (P = .001). On average, adherent patients gained an additional 1.8 cm over 1 year compared with nonadherent patients, adjusted for covariates.ConclusionGreater adherence to somatropin therapy is associated with improved height velocity. As suboptimal adherence to daily somatropin therapy is an issue for children with GHD, novel strategies to improve adherence may improve growth outcomes.     

Weight Loss and Gender: An Examination of Physician Attitudes

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate physician attitudes toward the treatment of overweight and obese individuals and to evaluate potential gender differences in treatment recommendations. Research Methods and Procedures: A survey describing several hypothetical patients was sent to 700 randomly selected physicians; 209 (29.9%) returned the survey. Two versions of the questionnaire (one for men and one for women) described three hypothetical patients at three levels of body mass index (BMI) (32, 28, and 25 kg/m²). One‐half of the physicians received a version of the questionnaire describing the patients as women, and one‐half received a version describing the patients as men. Respondents answered questions about attitudes toward treatment and specific interventions and referrals they would view as appropriate. Results: Physicians were more likely to encourage women with a BMI of 25 kg/m² to lose weight than men with the same BMI, and indicated that they would suggest more treatment referrals for women than men. Men with a BMI of 32 kg/m² were more likely to be encouraged to lose weight than women with the identical BMI. Physicians were more likely to encourage weight loss and see treatment referrals as appropriate for patients with higher BMIs. Discussion: This study indicates that physicians treat male and female patients differently, with physicians more likely to encourage weight loss and provide referrals for women with a BMI of 25 kg/m² than for men with an identical BMI and less likely to encourage weight loss for women than men with a BMI of 32 kg/m².     

Bariatric Surgery Patients’ Views of Their Physicians’ Weight‐Related Attitudes and Practices

Objective: A prior study found that nearly 80% of bariatric surgery patients felt that they were treated disrespectfully by members of the medical profession. This study assessed patient‐physician interactions in a group of bariatric surgery patients and in a group of less obese patients who sought weight loss by other means. Research Methods and Procedures: A total of 105 bariatric surgery candidates (mean BMI, 54.8 kg/m²) and 214 applicants to a randomized controlled trial of the effects of behavior modification and sibutramine (mean BMI, 37.8 kg/m²) completed a questionnaire that assessed patient‐physician interactions concerning weight. Results: Only 13% of bariatric surgery patients reported that they were usually or always treated disrespectfully by members of the medical profession, a percentage substantially lower than that found in the previous study. Surprisingly, surgery patients were significantly more satisfied than nonsurgery patients with the care they received for their obesity. Surgery patients also reported significantly more interactions with physicians concerning obesity and weight loss compared with nonsurgery patients. A substantial percentage of both groups, however, reported that their physician did not discuss weight control with them. Discussion: These and other findings suggest that doctor‐patient interactions concerning weight may have improved in the past decade; however, there is still much room for improvement. Increased efforts are needed to help physicians discuss, assess, and potentially treat obesity in primary care practice.     

What Potentially Modifiable Factors are Associated With Treatment Nonadherence in Pediatric Growth Hormone Deficiency? A Quantitative Study

ObjectiveA recent systematic review reported that up to 71% of patients with growth hormone deficiency and their families are nonadherent to treatment as prescribed. Nonadherence to growth hormone treatment presents a substantial and costly problem for the patient, health care provider, and health care system. The current study uniquely investigated the potentially modifiable factors associated with treatment nonadherence in this endocrine disorder.MethodsThe cross-sectional study was conducted among 82 parent/caregivers of children with growth hormone deficiency who were receiving growth hormone treatment. Self-report questionnaires investigated parent/caregiver perceptions and experiences of their child’s condition and prescribed treatment, in addition to their perceived relationship with their health care professional. The 8-item Morisky medication adherence scale was used for the assessment of treatment adherence.ResultsSixty-two percent of parents/caregivers were found to be nonadherent to growth hormone treatment as prescribed. Illness perceptions (consequences, identity, and coherence) and treatment concerns were found to be significantly associated with treatment adherence, as was the quality of the health care professional–parent/caregiver relationship.ConclusionThe study confirmed the extent of the adherence problem evident among the pediatric growth hormone deficiency population. In addition, it presented an insight into the explanatory factors that underpin nonadherence to growth hormone treatment. Our findings can be used to inform the development of adherence-focused interventions, with the purpose of supporting patients and their families and improving the use of prescribed growth hormone treatment within endocrine clinical practice.     

The impact of provider flexibility and capacity allocation on the performance of primary care practices

The two important but often conflicting metrics for any primary care practice are: (1) Timely Access and (2) Patient-physician Continuity. Timely access focuses on the ability of a patient to get access to a physician (or provider, in general) as soon as possible. Patient–physician continuity refers to building a strong or permanent relationship between a patient and a specific physician by maximizing patient visits to that physician. In the past decade, a new paradigm called advanced access or open access has been adopted by practices nationwide to encourage physicians to “do today’s work today.” However, most clinics still reserve pre-scheduled slots for long lead-time appointments due to patient preference and clinical necessities. Therefore, an important problem for clinics is how to optimally manage and allocate limited physician capacities as much as possible to meet the two types of demand—pre-scheduled (non-urgent) and open access (urgent, as perceived by the patient)—while simultaneously maximizing timely access and patient–physician continuity. In this study we adapt ideas of manufacturing process flexibility to capacity management in a primary care practice. Flexibility refers to the ability of a primary care physician to see patients of other physicians. We develop generalizable analytical algorithms for capacity allocation for an individual physician and a two physician practice. For multi-physician practices, we use a two-stage stochastic integer programming approach to investigate the value of flexibility. We find that flexibility has the greatest benefit when system workload is balanced, when the physicians have unequal workloads, and when the number of physicians in the practice increases. We also find that partial flexibility, which restricts the number of physicians a patient sees and thereby promotes continuity, simultaneously succeeds in providing high levels of timely access.     

THE LEBANESE PHYSICIAN: A PUBLIC'S VIEWPOINT

A physician's lack of humanity is a general complaint in public surveys. The physician‐patient relationship is viewed by the public as being reduced to a business relationship where the patient feels that she is merely a ‘client’ and the physician a healthcare ‘practitioner’ instead of a ‘care giver’. This public perception is not a phenomenon that is peculiar to Lebanon. Yet, the problem has been increasing over the years to the extent that patients feel that physicians are becoming inhumane and business oriented. While this might not characterize all physicians of the 21^st century, this might be true of at least some. Responses were collected from a study that was undertaken based on a questionnaire distributed to a pool of 650 participants from different geographical areas and different social and educational backgrounds in Lebanon. Participants were all older than18 years and mentally competent. None were physicians. The questionnaire was open‐ended and initially piloted among a random sample. The physician traits most desired by the public were found to be: moral traits (41%), interpersonal traits (36%), scientific traits (19%) and other (4%). The most unwanted traits/behaviours were a lack of interpersonal traits (57%), a lack of moral traits (40%) and a lack of scientific skills (3%). The physician‐patient relationship was perceived, in general, as being a flawed one. What can be done to remedy the image of the Lebanese physician that has been projected in the minds of the patients and the public at large? Nine major recommendations are presented.     

The Coordination of Dentists and Physicians in Managing Adverse Oral Effects of Drug Therapy–Report of a Case

Because people are living longer and older people generally use more medications than do the young, it is extremely important that the dentist be aware of the medications that are being taken by his/her patients as well as the reasons for the medications. Frequently, it may be necessary to consult with the patient's physician(s) in order to better understand the patient's medication history. This paper describes a case in which a patient was inappropriately following a long-term course of antibiotic therapy when only a short-term regimen had been intended by the patient's physician. The long-term antibiotic use eventually predisposed the patient to oral candidosis. The dentist contacted the physician and referred the patient back to the physician for an alternative medical regimen. This case report emphasizes that patients may incorrectly interpret physician or dentist instructions concerning medication use. The dentist may be in an excellent position to identify medication errors and should contact the patient's physician whenever in doubt.     

Impact of physician BMI on obesity care and beliefs

Using a national cross-sectional survey of 500 primary care physicians conducted between 9 February and 1 March 2011, the objective of this study was to assess the impact of physician BMI on obesity care, physician self-efficacy, perceptions of role-modeling weight-related health behaviors, and perceptions of patient trust in weight loss advice. We found that physicians with normal BMI were more likely to engage their obese patients in weight loss discussions as compared to overweight/obese physicians (30% vs. 18%, P = 0.010). Physicians with normal BMI had greater confidence in their ability to provide diet (53% vs. 37%, P = 0.002) and exercise counseling (56% vs. 38%, P = 0.001) to their obese patients. A higher percentage of normal BMI physicians believed that overweight/obese patients would be less likely to trust weight loss advice from overweight/obese doctors (80% vs. 69%, P = 0.02). Physicians in the normal BMI category were more likely to believe that physicians should model healthy weight-related behaviors-maintaining a healthy weight (72% vs. 56%, P = 0.002) and exercising regularly (73% vs. 57%, P = 0.001). The probability of a physician recording an obesity diagnosis (93% vs. 7%, P < 0.001) or initiating a weight loss conversation (89% vs. 11%, P ≤ 0.001) with their obese patients was higher when the physicians' perception of the patients' body weight met or exceeded their own personal body weight. These results suggest that more normal weight physicians provided recommended obesity care to their patients and felt confident doing so.     

In vitro effect of various mitogens on starfish (Asterias rubens) axial organ cells

The effects of various mitogens on axial organ (AO) cells of the sea star have been studied. Pokeweed mitogen (PWM) stimulates [³H]thymidine incorporation by the whole population of axial organ cells of the sea star. This effect occurs 24 hr after the addition of PWM and is maximal at 40 μg/ml. In contrast, no stimulation is observed when coelomocytes are treated with PWM under the same conditions. No stimulation of the whole AO cell population is observed in the presence of Con A or LPS. However, the AO cell population can be divided, on the basis of surface adherence properties, into two subpopulations, adherent and nonadherent. Con A stimulates the nonadherent cells, but not the adherent cells: The stimulating effect is maximal 24 hr after addition of Con A and at 0.2–0.5 μg/ml. In contrast, LPS stimulates the adherent but not the nonadherent cells and the stimulating effect is maximal at 24 hr and at 45 μg/ml.     

The Impact of Obesity on Primary Care Visits

Objective: To investigate the influence of patient obesity on primary care physician practice style. Research Methods and Procedures: This was a randomized, prospective study of 509 patients assigned for care by 105 primary care resident physicians. Patient data collected included sociodemographic information, self‐reported health status (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form‐36), evaluation for depression (Beck Depression Index), and satisfaction. Height and weight were measured to calculate the BMI. Videotapes of the visits were analyzed using the Davis Observation Code (DOC). Results: Regression equations were estimated relating obesity to visit length, each of the 20 individual DOC codes, and the six DOC Physician Practice Behavior Clusters, controlling for patient health status and sociodemographics. Obesity was not significantly associated with the length of the visit, but influenced what happened during the visit. Physicians spent less time educating obese patients about their health (p = 0.0062) and more time discussing exercise (p = 0.0075). Obesity was not related to discussions regarding nutrition. Physicians spent a greater portion of the visit on technical tasks when the patient was obese (p = 0.0528). Mean pre‐visit general satisfaction for obese patients was significantly lower than for non‐obese patients (p = 0.0069); however, there was no difference in post‐visit patient satisfaction. Discussion: Patient obesity impacts the medical visit. Further research can promote a greater understanding of the relationships between obese patients and their physicians.     

Medication Adherence in the General Population

Background

Adherence to medication is low in specific populations who need chronic medication. However, adherence to medication is also of interest in a more general fashion, independent of specific populations or side effects of particular drugs. If clinicians and researchers expect patients to show close to full adherence, it is relevant to know how likely the achievement of this goal is. Population based rates can provide an estimate of efforts needed to achieve near complete adherence in patient populations. The objective of the study was to collect normative data for medication nonadherence in the general population.

Methods and Findings

We assessed 2,512 persons (a representative sample of German population). Adherence was measured by Rief Adherence Index. We also assessed current medication intake and side effects. We found that at least 33% of Germans repeatedly fail to follow their doctor''s recommendations regarding pharmacological treatments and only 25% of Germans describe themselves as fully adherent. Nonadherence to medication occurs more often in younger patients with higher socioeconomic status taking short-term medications than in older patients with chronic conditions. Experience with medication side effects was the most prominent predictor of nonadherence.

Conclusions

The major strengths of our study are a representative sample and a novel approach to assess adherence. Nonadherece seems to be commonplace in the general population. Therefore adherence cannot be expected per se but needs special efforts on behalf of prescribers and public health initiatives. Nonadherence to medication should not only be considered as a drug-specific behaviour problem, but as a behaviour pattern that is independent of the prescribed medication.     

Medication nonadherence: an unrecognized cardiovascular risk factor

Nonadherence with prescribed drug regimens is a pervasive medical problem. Multiple variables affecting physicians and patients contribute to nonadherence, which negatively affects treatment outcomes. In patients with hypertension, medication nonadherence is a significant, often unrecognized, risk factor that contributes to poor blood pressure control, thereby contributing to the development of further vascular disorders such as heart failure, coronary heart disease, renal insufficiency, and stroke. Analysis of various patient populations shows that choice of drug, use of concomitant medications, tolerability of drug, and duration of drug treatment influence the prevalence of nonadherence. Intervention is required among patients and healthcare prescribers to increase awareness of the need for improved medication adherence. Within this process, it is important to identify indicators of nonadherence within patient populations. This review examines the prevalence of nonadherence as a risk factor in the management of chronic diseases, with a specific focus on antihypertensive medications. Factors leading to increased incidence of nonadherence and the strategies needed to improve adherence are discussed. Medication nonadherence, defined as a patient's passive failure to follow a prescribed drug regimen, remains a significant concern for healthcare professionals and patients. On average, one third to one half of patients do not comply with prescribed treatment regimens.[1-3] Nonadherence rates are relatively high across disease states, treatment regimens, and age groups, with the first several months of therapy characterized by the highest rate of discontinuation.[3] In fact, it has recently been reported that low adherence to beta-blockers or statins in patients who have survived a myocardial infarction results in an increased risk of death.[4] In addition to inadequate disease control, medication nonadherence results in a significant burden to healthcare utilization - the estimated yearly cost is $396 to $792 million.[1] Additionally, between one third and two thirds of all medication-related hospital admissions are attributed to nonadherence.[5,6]Cardiovascular disease, which accounts for approximately 1 million deaths in the United States each year, remains a significant health concern.[7] Risk factors for the development of cardiovascular disease are associated with defined risk-taking behaviors (eg, smoking), inherited traits (eg, family history), or laboratory abnormalities (eg, abnormal lipid panels).[7] A significant but often unrecognized cardiovascular risk factor universal to all patient populations is medication nonadherence; if a patient does not regularly take the medication prescribed to attenuate cardiovascular disease, no potential therapeutic gain can be achieved. Barriers to medication adherence are multifactorial and include complex medication regimens, convenience factors (eg, dosing frequency), behavioral factors, and treatment of asymptomatic conditions.[2] This review highlights the significance of nonadherence in the treatment of hypertension, a silent but life-threatening disorder that affects approximately 72 million adults in the United States.[7] Hypertension often develops in a cluster with insulin resistance, obesity, and hypercholesterolemia, which contributes to the risk imposed by nonadherence with antihypertensive medications. Numerous strategies to improve medication adherence are available, from enhancing patient education to providing medication adherence information to the healthcare team and will be discussed in this article.     

Ambulatory Management of Childhood Obesity

Objective: Childhood obesity is one of the most challenging issues facing healthcare providers today. The aims of this study were to describe the ambulatory management of childhood obesity by pediatricians (PDs) and family physicians (FPs) and to evaluate knowledge of and adherence to published recommendations. Research Methods and Procedures: A 42‐item, self‐administered questionnaire was mailed to 1207 randomly selected primary care physicians (PDs = 700, FPs = 507) between September 2001 and January 2002. Results: Of 339 (28%) responses, 287 were eligible (PDs = 213, FPs = 74). Most respondents were in group or solo practice (87%) in a suburban or urban, non‐inner city location (67%). The average age was 48 years (range = 31 to 85 years), and the mean years in practice was 17 (range = 1 to 55 years). Nineteen percent of physicians were aware of national recommendations. Three percent of physicians reported adherence to all recommendations. Knowledge of recommendations was not associated with a greater likelihood of adherence. However, physicians who were aware of recommendations were more likely to have positive attitudes about personal counseling ability (odds ratio = 2.4, confidence interval = 1.3 to 4.4) and the overall efficacy of obesity counseling (odds ratio = 4.3, confidence interval = 1.7 to 10.8). Poor patient motivation, patient noncompliance, and treatment futility were perceived as the most frequently encountered barriers to obesity treatment. Discussion: Most physicians are not aware of or adherent to national recommendations regarding childhood obesity. Awareness of recommendations was associated with more positive attitudes about personal counseling ability and the effectiveness of obesity counseling in general.     

A simple filtration device for separating nonadherent microorganisms from mammalian cells in in vitro studies on microbial adherence

In adherence studies, the removal of nonadherent microorganisms is essential for the valid enumeration of microorganisms that adhere to host cells. Although filtration devices are available commercially for the removal of nonadherent microorganisms, these are expensive and not reusable. In this article, we describe a simple, inexpensive, and reusable filtration device composed of two chambers of nylon, a nylon membrane of desired pore size, a rubber washer, and supporting stainless steel mesh. The device was effective in in vitro adherence assays for removing nonadherent endospores of Rhinosporidium seeberi from human buccal epithelial cells, providing valid counts of adherent microorganisms.     

Medication adherence in type 2 diabetes: the ENTRED study 2007, a French Population-Based Study

Background

Adherence to prescribed medications is a key dimension of healthcare quality. The aim of this large population-based study was to evaluate self-reported medication adherence and to identify factors linked with poor adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes in France.

Methodology

The ENTRED study 2007, a French national survey of people treated for diabetes, was based on a representative sample of patients who claimed reimbursement for oral hypoglycaemic agents and/or insulin at least three times between August 2006 and July 2007, and who were randomly selected from the database of the two main National Health Insurance Systems. Medication adherence was determined using a six-item self-administered questionnaire. A multinomial polychotomous logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with medication adherence in the 3,637 persons with type 2 diabetes.

Principal Findings

Thirty nine percent of patients reported good medication adherence, 49% medium adherence and 12% poor adherence. The factors significantly associated with poor adherence in multivariate analysis were socio-demographic factors: age <45 years, non-European geographical origin, financial difficulties and being professionally active; disease and therapy-related factors: HbA_1c>8% and existing diabetes complications; and health care-related factors: difficulties for taking medication alone, decision making by the patient only, poor acceptability of medical recommendations, lack of family or social support, need for information on treatment, reporting no confidence in the future, need for medical support and follow-up by a specialist physician.

Conclusions

In a country with a high level of access to healthcare, our study demonstrated a substantial low level of medication adherence in type 2 diabetic patients. Better identification of those with poor adherence and individualised suitable recommendations remain essential for better healthcare management.