How well does the HoT score reflect sequence alignment accuracy?

Multiple sequence alignment is an essential tool in many areas of biological research, and the accuracy of an alignment can strongly affect the accuracy of a downstream application such as phylogenetic analysis, identification of functional motifs, or polymerase chain reaction primer design. The heads or tails (HoT) method (Landan G, Graur D. 2007. Heads or tails: a simple reliability check for multiple sequence alignments. Mol Biol Evol. 24:1380-1383.) assesses the consistency of an alignment by comparing the alignment of a set of sequences with the alignment of the same set of sequences written in reverse order. This study shows that HoT scores and the alignment accuracies are positively correlated, so alignments with higher HoT scores are preferable. However, HoT scores are overestimates of alignment accuracy in general, with the extent of overestimation depending on the method used for multiple sequence alignment.     

The deterministic effects of alignment bias in phylogenetic inference

Alignment of nucleotide and/or amino acid sequences is a fundamental component of sequence‐based molecular phylogenetic studies. Here we examined how different alignment methods affect the phylogenetic trees that are inferred from the alignments. We used simulations to determine how alignment errors can lead to systematic biases that affect phylogenetic inference from those sequences. We compared four approaches to sequence alignment: progressive pairwise alignment, simultaneous multiple alignment of sequence fragments, local pairwise alignment and direct optimization. When taking into account branch support, implied alignments produced by direct optimization were found to show the most extreme behaviour (based on the alignment programs for which nearly equivalent alignment parameters could be set) in that they provided the strongest support for the correct tree in the simulations in which it was easy to resolve the correct tree and the strongest support for the incorrect tree in our long‐branch‐attraction simulations. When applied to alignment‐sensitive process partitions with different histories, direct optimization showed the strongest mutual influence between the process partitions when they were aligned and phylogenetically analysed together, which makes detecting recombination more difficult. Simultaneous alignment performed well relative to direct optimization and progressive pairwise alignment across all simulations. Rather than relying upon methods that integrate alignment and tree search into a single step without accounting for alignment uncertainty, as with implied alignments, we suggest that simultaneous alignment using the similarity criterion, within the context of information available on biological processes and function, be applied whenever possible for sequence‐based phylogenetic analyses.     

Heads or tails: a simple reliability check for multiple sequence alignments

The question of multiple sequence alignment quality has received much attention from developers of alignment methods. Less forthcoming, however, are practical measures for addressing alignment quality issues in real life settings. Here, we present a simple methodology to help identify and quantify the uncertainties in multiple sequence alignments and their effects on subsequent analyses. The proposed methodology is based upon the a priori expectation that sequence alignment results should be independent of the orientation of the input sequences. Thus, for totally unambiguous cases, reversing residue order prior to alignment should yield an exact reversed alignment of that obtained by using the unreversed sequences. Such "ideal" alignments, however, are the exception in real life settings, and the two alignments, which we term the heads and tails alignments, are usually different to a greater or lesser degree. The degree of agreement or discrepancy between these two alignments may be used to assess the reliability of the sequence alignment. Furthermore, any alignment dependent sequence analysis protocol can be carried out separately for each of the two alignments, and the two sets of results may be compared with each other, providing us with valuable information regarding the robustness of the whole analytical process. The heads-or-tails (HoT) methodology can be easily implemented for any choice of alignment method and for any subsequent analytical protocol. We demonstrate the utility of HoT for phylogenetic reconstruction for the case of 130 sequences belonging to the chemoreceptor superfamily in Drosophila melanogaster, and by analysis of the BaliBASE alignment database. Surprisingly, Neighbor-Joining methods of phylogenetic reconstruction turned out to be less affected by alignment errors than maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods.     

CLUSTAL: a package for performing multiple sequence alignment on a microcomputer

An approach for performing multiple alignments of large numbers of amino acid or nucleotide sequences is described. The method is based on first deriving a phylogenetic tree from a matrix of all pairwise sequence similarity scores, obtained using a fast pairwise alignment algorithm. Then the multiple alignment is achieved from a series of pairwise alignments of clusters of sequences, following the order of branching in the tree. The method is sufficiently fast and economical with memory to be easily implemented on a microcomputer, and yet the results obtained are comparable to those from packages requiring mainframe computer facilities.     

MASCOT: multiple alignment system for protein sequences based on three-way dynamic programming

A multiple alignment methodology that can produce high-qualityalignment is extremely important for predicting the structureof unknown proteins. Nearly all the methodologies developedso far have employed two-way alignment only. Although thesemethods are fast, the alignments they produce lose reliabilityas the similarity of sequences reduces. We developed the MASCOTmultiple alignment system. MASCOT can sustain the reliabilityof alignment even when the similarity of sequences is low. MASCOTachieves high-quality alignment by employing three-way alignmentin addition to two-way alignment. The resultant alignments arerefined by simulated annealing to higher quality. We also usea cluster analysis of sequences to produce highly reliable alignments.     

Effects of nucleotide sequence alignment on phylogeny estimation: a case study of 18S rDNAs of apicomplexa

The reconstruction of phylogenetic history is predicated on being able to accurately establish hypotheses of character homology, which involves sequence alignment for studies based on molecular sequence data. In an empirical study investigating nucleotide sequence alignment, we inferred phylogenetic trees for 43 species of the Apicomplexa and 3 of Dinozoa based on complete small-subunit rDNA sequences, using six different multiple-alignment procedures: manual alignment based on the secondary structure of the 18S rRNA molecule, and automated similarity-based alignment algorithms using the PileUp, ClustalW, TreeAlign, MALIGN, and SAM computer programs. Trees were constructed using neighboring-joining, weighted-parsimony, and maximum- likelihood methods. All of the multiple sequence alignment procedures yielded the same basic structure for the estimate of the phylogenetic relationship among the taxa, which presumably represents the underlying phylogenetic signal. However, the placement of many of the taxa was sensitive to the alignment procedure used; and the different alignments produced trees that were on average more dissimilar from each other than did the different tree-building methods used. The multiple alignments from the different procedures varied greatly in length, but aligned sequence length was not a good predictor of the similarity of the resulting phylogenetic trees. We also systematically varied the gap weights (the relative cost of inserting a new gap into a sequence or extending an already-existing gap) for the ClustalW program, and this produced alignments that were at least as different from each other as those produced by the different alignment algorithms. Furthermore, there was no combination of gap weights that produced the same tree as that from the structure alignment, in spite of the fact that many of the alignments were similar in length to the structure alignment. We also investigated the phylogenetic information content of the helical and nonhelical regions of the rDNA, and conclude that the helical regions are the most informative. We therefore conclude that many of the literature disagreements concerning the phylogeny of the Apicomplexa are probably based on differences in sequence alignment strategies rather than differences in data or tree-building methods.      

A reality check for alignments and trees

Making multiple sequence alignments is one of the more commonplace procedures in modern biology. Multiple alignments are typically generated by feeding sequences into the alignment program from the N-terminus to the C-terminus. Recent results show that if the same sequences are processed from the C- to the N-terminus, a different alignment is often obtained. Because phylogenetic trees are built from alignments, the resulting trees can also differ. The new findings highlight sequence alignment as a crucial step in molecular evolutionary studies and provide straightforward measures to assess alignment reliability.     

Multiple protein sequence alignment

Multiple sequence alignments are essential in computational analysis of protein sequences and structures, with applications in structure modeling, functional site prediction, phylogenetic analysis and sequence database searching. Constructing accurate multiple alignments for divergent protein sequences remains a difficult computational task, and alignment speed becomes an issue for large sequence datasets. Here, I review methodologies and recent advances in the multiple protein sequence alignment field, with emphasis on the use of additional sequence and structural information to improve alignment quality.     

Pandit: a database of protein and associated nucleotide domains with inferred trees

MOTIVATION: A large, high-quality database of homologous sequence alignments with good estimates of their corresponding phylogenetic trees will be a valuable resource to those studying phylogenetics. It will allow researchers to compare current and new models of sequence evolution across a large variety of sequences. The large quantity of data may provide inspiration for new models and methodology to study sequence evolution and may allow general statements about the relative effect of different molecular processes on evolution. RESULTS: The Pandit 7.6 database contains 4341 families of sequences derived from the seed alignments of the Pfam database of amino acid alignments of families of homologous protein domains (Bateman et al., 2002). Each family in Pandit includes an alignment of amino acid sequences that matches the corresponding Pfam family seed alignment, an alignment of DNA sequences that contain the coding sequence of the Pfam alignment when they can be recovered (overall, 82.9% of sequences taken from Pfam) and the alignment of amino acid sequences restricted to only those sequences for which a DNA sequence could be recovered. Each of the alignments has an estimate of the phylogenetic tree associated with it. The tree topologies were obtained using the neighbor joining method based on maximum likelihood estimates of the evolutionary distances, with branch lengths then calculated using a standard maximum likelihood approach.     

indel-Seq-Gen: a new protein family simulator incorporating domains, motifs, and indels

Reconstructing the evolutionary history of protein sequences will provide a better understanding of divergence mechanisms of protein superfamilies and their functions. Long-term protein evolution often includes dynamic changes such as insertion, deletion, and domain shuffling. Such dynamic changes make reconstructing protein sequence evolution difficult and affect the accuracy of molecular evolutionary methods, such as multiple alignments and phylogenetic methods. Unfortunately, currently available simulation methods are not sufficiently flexible and do not allow biologically realistic dynamic protein sequence evolution. We introduce a new method, indel-Seq-Gen (iSG), that can simulate realistic evolutionary processes of protein sequences with insertions and deletions (indels). Unlike other simulation methods, iSG allows the user to simulate multiple subsequences according to different evolutionary parameters, which is necessary for generating realistic protein families with multiple domains. iSG tracks all evolutionary events including indels and outputs the "true" multiple alignment of the simulated sequences. iSG can also generate a larger sequence space by allowing the use of multiple related root sequences. With all these functions, iSG can be used to test the accuracy of, for example, multiple alignment methods, phylogenetic methods, evolutionary hypotheses, ancestral protein reconstruction methods, and protein family classification methods. We empirically evaluated the performance of iSG against currently available methods by simulating the evolution of the G protein-coupled receptor and lipocalin protein families. We examined their true multiple alignments, reconstruction of the transmembrane regions and beta-strands, and the results of similarity search against a protein database using the simulated sequences. We also presented an example of using iSG for examining how phylogenetic reconstruction is affected by high indel rates.     

A framework for phylogenetic sequence alignment

A phylogenetic alignment differs from other forms of multiple sequence alignment because it must align homologous features. Therefore, the goal of the alignment procedure should be to identify the events associated with the homologies, so that the aligned sequences accurately reflect those events. That is, an alignment is a set of hypotheses about historical events rather than about residues, and any alignment algorithm must be designed to identify and align such events. Some events (e.g., substitution) involve single residues, and our current algorithms can successfully align those events when sequence similarity is great enough. However, the other common events (such as duplication, translocation, deletion, insertion and inversion) can create complex sequence patterns that defeat such algorithms. There is therefore currently no computerized algorithm that can successfully align molecular sequences for phylogenetic analysis, except under restricted circumstances. Manual re-alignment of a preliminary alignment is thus the only feasible contemporary methodology, although it should be possible to automate such a procedure.     

Tcoffee@igs: A web server for computing,evaluating and combining multiple sequence alignments

This paper presents Tcoffee@igs, a new server provided to the community by Hewlet Packard computers and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. This server is a web-based tool dedicated to the computation, the evaluation and the combination of multiple sequence alignments. It uses the latest version of the T-Coffee package. Given a set of unaligned sequences, the server returns an evaluated multiple sequence alignment and the associated phylogenetic tree. This server also makes it possible to evaluate the local reliability of an existing alignment and to combine several alternative multiple alignments into a single new one. Tcoffee@igs can be used for aligning protein, RNA or DNA sequences. Datasets of up to 100 sequences (2000 residues long) can be processed. The server and its documentation are available from: http://igs-server.cnrs-mrs.fr/Tcoffee/.     

Improved sensitivity of profile searches through the use of sequence weights and gap excision

Position-specific substitution matrices, known as profiles,derived from multiple sequence alignments are currently usedto search sequence databases for distantly related members ofprotein families. The performance of the database searches isenhanced by using (i) a sequence weighting scheme which assignshigher weights to more distantly related sequences based onbranch lengths derived from phylogenetic trees, (ii) exclusionof positions with mainly padding characters at sites of insertionsor deletions and (iii) the BLOSUM62 residue comparison matrix.A natural consequence of these modifications is an improvementin the alignment of new sequences to the profiles. However,the accuracy of the alignments can be further increased by employinga similarity residue comparison matrix. These developments areimplemented in a program called PROFILEWEIGHT which runs onUnix and Vax computers. The only input required by the programis the multiple sequence alignment. The output from PROFILEWEIGHTis a profile designed to be used by existing searching and alignmentprograms. Test results from database searches with four differentfamilies of proteins show the improved sensitivity of the weightedprofiles.     

The relative sensitivity of different alignment methods and character codings in sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity analysis provides a way to measure robustness of clades in sequence‐based phylogenetic analyses to variation in alignment parameters rather than measuring their branch support. We compared three different approaches to multiple sequence alignment in the context of sensitivity analysis: progressive pairwise alignment, as implemented in MUSCLE; simultaneous multiple alignment of sequence fragments, as implemented in DCA; and direct optimization followed by generation of the implied alignment(s), as implemented in POY. We set out to determine the relative sensitivity of these three alignment methods using rDNA sequences and randomly generated sequences. A total of 36 parameter sets were used to create the alignments, varying the transition, transversion, and gap costs. Tree searches were performed using four different character‐coding and weighting approaches: the cost function used for alignment or equally weighted parsimony with gap positions treated as missing data, separate characters, or as fifth states. POY was found to be as sensitive, or more sensitive, to variation in alignment parameters than DCA and MUSCLE for the three empirical datasets, and POY was found to be more sensitive than MUSCLE, which in turn was found to be as sensitive, or more sensitive, than DCA when applied to the randomly generated sequences when sensitivity was measured using the averaged jackknife values. When significant differences in relative sensitivity were found between the different ways of weighting character‐state changes, equally weighted parsimony, for all three ways of treating gapped positions, was less sensitive than applying the same cost function used in alignment for phylogenetic analysis. When branch support is incorporated into the sensitivity criterion, our results favour the use of simultaneous alignment and progressive pairwise alignment using the similarity criterion over direct optimization followed by using the implied alignment(s) to calculate branch support.     

The impact of multiple protein sequence alignment on phylogenetic estimation

Multiple sequence alignment is typically the first step in estimating phylogenetic trees, with the assumption being that as alignments improve, so will phylogenetic reconstructions. Over the last decade or so, new multiple sequence alignment methods have been developed to improve comparative analyses of protein structure, but these new methods have not been typically used in phylogenetic analyses. In this paper, we report on a simulation study that we performed to evaluate the consequences of using these new multiple sequence alignment methods in terms of the resultant phylogenetic reconstruction. We find that while alignment accuracy is positively correlated with phylogenetic accuracy, the amount of improvement in phylogenetic estimation that results from an improved alignment can range from quite small to substantial. We observe that phylogenetic accuracy is most highly correlated with alignment accuracy when sequences are most difficult to align, and that variation in alignment accuracy can have little impact on phylogenetic accuracy when alignment error rates are generally low. We discuss these observations and implications for future work.     

Phylo-VISTA: interactive visualization of multiple DNA sequence alignments

MOTIVATION: The power of multi-sequence comparison for biological discovery is well established. The need for new capabilities to visualize and compare cross-species alignment data is intensified by the growing number of genomic sequence datasets being generated for an ever-increasing number of organisms. To be efficient these visualization algorithms must support the ability to accommodate consistently a wide range of evolutionary distances in a comparison framework based upon phylogenetic relationships. RESULTS: We have developed Phylo-VISTA, an interactive tool for analyzing multiple alignments by visualizing a similarity measure for multiple DNA sequences. The complexity of visual presentation is effectively organized using a framework based upon interspecies phylogenetic relationships. The phylogenetic organization supports rapid, user-guided interspecies comparison. To aid in navigation through large sequence datasets, Phylo-VISTA leverages concepts from VISTA that provide a user with the ability to select and view data at varying resolutions. The combination of multiresolution data visualization and analysis, combined with the phylogenetic framework for interspecies comparison, produces a highly flexible and powerful tool for visual data analysis of multiple sequence alignments. AVAILABILITY: Phylo-VISTA is available at http://www-gsd.lbl.gov/phylovista. It requires an Internet browser with Java Plug-in 1.4.2 and it is integrated into the global alignment program LAGAN at http://lagan.stanford.edu     

Positional statistical significance in sequence alignment.

Beginning with the concept of near-optimal sequence alignments, we can assign a probability that each element in one sequence is paired in an alignment with each element in another sequence. This involves a sum over the set of all possible pairwise alignments. The method employs a designed hidden Markov model (HMM) and the rigorous forward and forward-backward algorithms of Rabiner. The approach can use any standard sequence-element-to-element probabilistic similarity measures and affine gap penalty functions. This allows the positional alignment statistical significance to be obtained as a function of such variables. A measure of the probabilistic relationship between any single sequence and a set of sequences can be directly obtained. In addition, the employed HMM with the Viterbi algorithm provides a simple link to the standard dynamic programming optimal alignment algorithms.     

Towards a reliable objective function for multiple sequence alignments.

Multiple sequence alignment is a fundamental tool in a number of different domains in modern molecular biology, including functional and evolutionary studies of a protein family. Multiple alignments also play an essential role in the new integrated systems for genome annotation and analysis. Thus, the development of new multiple alignment scores and statistics is essential, in the spirit of the work dedicated to the evaluation of pairwise sequence alignments for database searching techniques. We present here norMD, a new objective scoring function for multiple sequence alignments. NorMD combines the advantages of the column-scoring techniques with the sensitivity of methods incorporating residue similarity scores. In addition, norMD incorporates ab initio sequence information, such as the number, length and similarity of the sequences to be aligned. The sensitivity and reliability of the norMD objective function is demonstrated using structural alignments in the SCOP and BAliBASE databases. The norMD scores are then applied to the multiple alignments of the complete sequences (MACS) detected by BlastP with E-value<10, for a set of 734 hypothetical proteins encoded by the Vibrio cholerae genome. Unrelated or badly aligned sequences were automatically removed from the MACS, leaving a high-quality multiple alignment which could be reliably exploited in a subsequent functional and/or structural annotation process. After removal of unreliable sequences, 176 (24 %) of the alignments contained at least one sequence with a functional annotation. 103 of these new matches were supported by significant hits to the Interpro domain and motif database.     

Improving the alignment quality of consistency based aligners with an evaluation function using synonymous protein words

Most sequence alignment tools can successfully align protein sequences with higher levels of sequence identity. The accuracy of corresponding structure alignment, however, decreases rapidly when considering distantly related sequences (<20% identity). In this range of identity, alignments optimized so as to maximize sequence similarity are often inaccurate from a structural point of view. Over the last two decades, most multiple protein aligners have been optimized for their capacity to reproduce structure-based alignments while using sequence information. Methods currently available differ essentially in the similarity measurement between aligned residues using substitution matrices, Fourier transform, sophisticated profile-profile functions, or consistency-based approaches, more recently.In this paper, we present a flexible similarity measure for residue pairs to improve the quality of protein sequence alignment. Our approach, called SymAlign, relies on the identification of conserved words found across a sizeable fraction of the considered dataset, and supported by evolutionary analysis. These words are then used to define a position specific substitution matrix that better reflects the biological significance of local similarity. The experiment results show that the SymAlign scoring scheme can be incorporated within T-Coffee to improve sequence alignment accuracy. We also demonstrate that SymAlign is less sensitive to the presence of structurally non-similar proteins. In the analysis of the relationship between sequence identity and structure similarity, SymAlign can better differentiate structurally similar proteins from non- similar proteins. We show that protein sequence alignments can be significantly improved using a similarity estimation based on weighted n-grams. In our analysis of the alignments thus produced, sequence conservation becomes a better indicator of structural similarity. SymAlign also provides alignment visualization that can display sub-optimal alignments on dot-matrices. The visualization makes it easy to identify well-supported alternative alignments that may not have been identified by dynamic programming. SymAlign is available at http://bio-cluster.iis.sinica.edu.tw/SymAlign/.     

Evolutionary distances in the twilight zone--a rational kernel approach

Phylogenetic tree reconstruction is traditionally based on multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) and heavily depends on the validity of this information bottleneck. With increasing sequence divergence, the quality of MSAs decays quickly. Alignment-free methods, on the other hand, are based on abstract string comparisons and avoid potential alignment problems. However, in general they are not biologically motivated and ignore our knowledge about the evolution of sequences. Thus, it is still a major open question how to define an evolutionary distance metric between divergent sequences that makes use of indel information and known substitution models without the need for a multiple alignment. Here we propose a new evolutionary distance metric to close this gap. It uses finite-state transducers to create a biologically motivated similarity score which models substitutions and indels, and does not depend on a multiple sequence alignment. The sequence similarity score is defined in analogy to pairwise alignments and additionally has the positive semi-definite property. We describe its derivation and show in simulation studies and real-world examples that it is more accurate in reconstructing phylogenies than competing methods. The result is a new and accurate way of determining evolutionary distances in and beyond the twilight zone of sequence alignments that is suitable for large datasets.