Telomere and centromere association tendencies in the human male metaphase complement

Summary Generalized distances between centromeres and between telomeres were statistically analyzed (x ² tests) in 100 trypsin-banded metaphase figures derived from normal males.Analysis of association tendencies on the first column of obtained c-c, p-p, q-p, and p-q histograms showed significant heterochromatin attraction not only between nonacrocentrics and acrocentrics but also between two nonacrocentric chromosome pairs (1 and 16). However since, not all c-heterochromatin-rich chromosomes were involved in associations (pair 5), and conversely, since chromosomes without an important centromeric heterochromatin block were involved in associations (pairs 8 and 11), it is probable that centromeric heterochromatin is not the only factor responsible for chromosome association. Moreover associations occur not only at the centromeres; in our circle analysis of the binding capacity of the telomeres or centromere of one chromosome pair with the telomeres or the centromeres of all other chromosome pairs, we also found preferential associations for T(4,13), T(9,15), T(11,15), T(13,19) T(15,19), T(17,18), T(17,22), and T(19,20).We therefore suggest that heterochromatin is not the only reason for chromosome association and that telomeres may also play an important part in this process.     

The compact Brachypodium genome conserves centromeric regions of a common ancestor with wheat and rice

The evolution of five chromosomes of Brachypodium distachyon from a 12-chromosome ancestor of all grasses by dysploidy raises an interesting question about the fate of redundant centromeres. Three independent but complementary approaches were pursued to study centromeric region homologies among the chromosomes of Brachypodium, wheat, and rice. The genes present in pericentromeres of the basic set of seven chromosomes of wheat and the Triticeae, and the 80 rice centromeric genes spanning the CENH3 binding domain of centromeres 3, 4, 5, 7, and 8 were used as “anchor” markers to identify centromere locations in the B. distachyon chromosomes. A total of 53 B. distachyon bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones anchored by wheat pericentromeric expressed sequence tags (ESTs) were used as probes for BAC-fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of B. distachyon mitotic chromosomes. Integrated sequence alignment and BAC-FISH data were used to determine the approximate positions of active and inactive centromeres in the five B. distachyon chromosomes. The following syntenic relationships of the centromeres for Brachypodium (Bd), rice (R), and wheat (W) were evident: Bd1-R6, Bd2-R5-W1, Bd3-R10, Bd4-R11-W4, and Bd5-R4. Six rice centromeres syntenic to five wheat centromeres were inactive in Brachypodium chromosomes. The conservation of centromere gene synteny among several sets of homologous centromeres of three species indicates that active genes can persist in ancient centromeres with more than 40 million years of shared evolutionary history. Annotation of a BAC contig spanning an inactive centromere in chromosome Bd3 which is syntenic to rice Cen8 and W7 pericentromeres, along with BAC FISH data from inactive centromeres revealed that the centromere inactivation was accompanied by the loss of centromeric retrotransposons and turnover of centromere-specific satellites during Bd chromosome evolution.     

Synaptonemal complex components persist at centromeres and are required for homologous centromere pairing in mouse spermatocytes

Recent studies in simple model organisms have shown that centromere pairing is important for ensuring high-fidelity meiotic chromosome segregation. However, this process and the mechanisms regulating it in higher eukaryotes are unknown. Here we present the first detailed study of meiotic centromere pairing in mouse spermatogenesis and link it with key events of the G2/metaphase I transition. In mouse we observed no evidence of the persistent coupling of centromeres that has been observed in several model organisms. We do however find that telomeres associate in non-homologous pairs or small groups in B type spermatogonia and pre-leptotene spermatocytes, and this association is disrupted by deletion of the synaptonemal complex component SYCP3. Intriguingly, we found that, in mid prophase, chromosome synapsis is not initiated at centromeres, and centromeric regions are the last to pair in the zygotene-pachytene transition. In late prophase, we first identified the proteins that reside at paired centromeres. We found that components of the central and lateral element and transverse filaments of the synaptonemal complex are retained at paired centromeres after disassembly of the synaptonemal complex along diplotene chromosome arms. The absence of SYCP1 prevents centromere pairing in knockout mouse spermatocytes. The localization dynamics of SYCP1 and SYCP3 suggest that they play different roles in promoting homologous centromere pairing. SYCP1 remains only at paired centromeres coincident with the time at which some kinetochore proteins begin loading at centromeres, consistent with a role in assembly of meiosis-specific kinetochores. After removal of SYCP1 from centromeres, SYCP3 then accumulates at paired centromeres where it may promote bi-orientation of homologous centromeres. We propose that, in addition to their roles as synaptonemal complex components, SYCP1 and SYCP3 act at the centromeres to promote the establishment and/or maintenance of centromere pairing and, by doing so, improve the segregation fidelity of mammalian meiotic chromosomes.     

Non-homologous chromosome pairing and crossover formation in haploid rice meiosis

While many studies have provided significant insight into homolog pairing during meiosis, information on non-homologous pairing is much less abundant. In the present study, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to investigate non-homologous pairing in haploid rice during meiosis. At pachytene, non-homologous chromosomes paired and formed synaptonemal complexes. FISH analysis data indicated that chromosome pairing could be grouped into three major types: (1) single chromosome paired fold-back as the univalent structure, (2) two non-homologous chromosomes paired as the bivalent structure, and (3) three or more non-homologous chromosomes paired as the multivalent structure. In the survey of 70 cells, 65 contained univalents, 45 contained bivalents, and 49 contained multivalent. Moreover, chromosomes 9 and 10 as well as chromosomes 11 and 12 formed non-homologous bivalents at a higher frequency than the other chromosomes. However, chiasma was always detected in the bivalent only between chromosomes 11 and 12 at diakinesis or metaphase I, indicating the pairing between these two chromosomes leads non-homologous recombination during meiosis. The synaptonemal complex formation between non-homologs was further proved by immunodetection of RCE8, PAIR2, and ZEP1. Especially, ZEP1 only loaded onto the paired chromosomes other than the un-paired chromosomes at pachytene in haploid.     

Sequence of centromere separation: Analysis of mitotic chromosomes in man

Summary Mitotic chromosomes from human peripheral lymphocytes studied at the junction of metaphase and anaphase show that the centromeres of various chromosomes separate in a nonrandom, apparently genetically controlled sequence. It does not depend upon the position of the centromere in the chromosome, the length of the chromosome or total amount of detectable C-chromatin. In man, several chromosomes e.g. 18, 17, 2, separate very early. Such early cells do not include nos. 1, 13, 14, 15, and Y and very rarely nos. 21 and 22. The last separating chromosomes are those from group D, G, no. 1, 16, and Y. The possible implication of these findings in evolution, non-disjunction and the control of centromere separation sequences is discussed.This study was supported by a grant from National Institure of Health (GM 24591)     

Cytogenetical studies onBougainvillea. I. a case of interchange heterozygosity

A case of interchange heterozygosity has been found inB. peruviana cv “Princess Margaret Rose” in which there is a regular formation of 15 bivalents and an interchange multiple of 4 chromosomes. The multiple is always associated with the nucleolus at diakinesis, indicating that one of the chromosome involved is nucleolar. The nucleolar pair of chromosomes shows a slight heteromorphicity which may be due to an unequal interchange. Although 80% of interchange multiples orientate non-disjunctionally, yet 65% pollen is stainable. The pollen is ineffective in self pollination, but highly effective in crosses with 2x and 3x cultivars ofB. spectabilis. The higher pollen stainability indicates that the deficiencies and duplications caused by non-disjunction do not have serious physiological offects on pollen grains and that its genome can withstand rearrangements.     

Chromosome engineering: generation of mono- and dicentric isochromosomes in a somatic cell hybrid system

The most common isochromosome found in humans involves the long arm of the X, i(Xq), and is associated with a subset of Turner syndrome cases. To study the formation and behavior of isochromosomes in a more tractable experimental system, we have developed a somatic cell hybrid model system that allows for the selection of mono- or dicentric isochromosomes involving the short arm of the X, i(Xp). Simultaneous positive and negative counterselection of a mouse/human somatic cell hybrid containing a human X chromosome, selecting for retention of the UBE1 locus in Xp but against the HPRT locus in Xq, results in a variety of abnormalities of the X chromosome involving deletions of Xq. We have generated 70 such ”Pushmi-Pullyu” hybrids derived from seven independent X chromosomes. Cytogenetic analysis of these hybrids using fluorescence in situ hybridization showed i(Xp) chromosomes in ∼19% of the hybrids. Southern blot and polymerase chain reaction analyses of the Pushmi-Pullyu hybrids revealed a distribution of breakpoints along Xq. The distance between the centromeres of the dicentric i(Xp)s generated ranged from ∼2 Mb to ∼20 Mb. To examine centromeric activity in these dicentric i(Xp)s, we used indirect immunofluorescence with antibodies to centromere protein E (CENP-E). CENP-E was detected at only one of the centromeres of a dicentric i(Xp) with ∼2–3 Mb of Xq DNA. In contrast, CENP-E was detected at both centromeres of a dicentric i(Xp) with ∼14 Mb of Xq DNA. Two other dicentric i(Xp) chromosomes were heterogeneous with respect to centromeric activity, suggesting that centromeric activity and chromosome stability of dicentric chromosomes may be more complicated than previously thought. The Pushmi-Pullyu model system presented in this study may provide a tool for examining the structure and function of mammalian centromeres. Received: 15 December 1998; in revised form: 2 March 1999 / Accepted: 5 April 1999     

Meiotic segregation of five different reciprocal translocations in the onion fly,Hylemya antiqua (Meigen)

For one translocation (T14) with short interstitial segments in Hylemya antiqua significant differences in segregation behaviour between males and females were observed. In males the ratio of alternate:adjacent 1:adjacent 2 was approximately 730 and in females about 813. This difference is attributed to the difference in type of chromosome association. Female meiosis is chiasmate and male meiosis is achiasmate. It is suggested that meiotic pairing in males results in relative short Coorientation Determing Distances (CDDs) between homologous centromeres which favours alternate and adjacent 1 segregation. In females because of non-localized chiasmata on the average no differences in CDD between homologous and nonhomologous centromeres are expected. This might explain the occurrence of coorientation between non-homologous centromeres resulting in adjacent 2 segregations. Four other translocations with longer interstitial segments than T14 showed in males as well as females predominantly an alternate and adjacent 1 segregation, adjacent 2 was hardly found (0–3.6%). The longer distance between non-homologous centromeres is probably the reason.     

Chromosome pairing in a Lolium temulentum X Lolium perenne diploid hybrid with a low chiasma frequency

Summary Despite an average difference of about 50% in DNA amount, homoeologous chromosomes pair effectively at first metaphase in the diploid interspecific hybrid between Lolium temulentum and Lolium perenne. However, in the presence of accessory B chromosomes and diploidising genes pairing at metaphase I is severely reduced. Reconstruction of serial electron micrographs through pollen mother cell nuclei show that synaptonemal complexes are formed at pachytene between not only homoeologous but also non-homologous chromosome segments resulting in multivalent formation. These associations are largely ineffective in terms of chiasma formation and degenerate at late pachytene. It is highly probable that the pairing determinants exercise their control on chromosome pairing largely by prohibiting the siting of crossovers in homoeologously paired chromosome segments.     

Dynamics of chromosome organization and pairing during meiotic prophase in fission yeast

Interactions between homologous chromosomes (pairing, recombination) are of central importance for meiosis. We studied entire chromosomes and defined chromosomal subregions in synchronous meiotic cultures of Schizosaccharomyces pombe by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Probes of different complexity were applied to spread nuclei, to delineate whole chromosomes, to visualize repeated sequences of centromeres, telomeres, and ribosomal DNA, and to study unique sequences of different chromosomal regions. In diploid nuclei, homologous chromosomes share a joint territory even before entry into meiosis. The centromeres of all chromosomes are clustered in vegetative and meiotic prophase cells, whereas the telomeres cluster near the nucleolus early in meiosis and maintain this configuration throughout meiotic prophase. Telomeres and centromeres appear to play crucial roles for chromosome organization and pairing, both in vegetative cells and during meiosis. Homologous pairing of unique sequences shows regional differences and is most frequent near centromeres and telomeres. Multiple homologous interactions are formed independently of each other. Pairing increases during meiosis, but not all chromosomal regions become closely paired in every meiosis. There is no detectable axial compaction of chromosomes in meiotic prophase. S. pombe does not form mature synaptonemal complexes, but axial element-like structures (linear elements), which were analyzed in parallel. Their appearance coincides with pairing of interstitial chromosomal regions. Axial elements may define minimal structures required for efficient pairing and recombination of meiotic chromosomes.     

Meiosis in polyhaploid Hordeum: hemizygous ineffective control of diploid-like behaviour in a hexaploid?

Meiotic chromosome behaviour was studied in the hexaploid Hordeum parodii (2n=6x=42) and in six haploids (2n=3x=21) obtained from a cross between H. parodii and H. bulbosum (2n=2x=14) whereby all bulbosum chromosomes were selectively eliminated. The alloploid nature of H. parodii was evident from the exclusive bivalent formation at the hexaploid level and the low and variable number of bivalents in its haploid derivatives. In haploids, both nonhomologous (intragenomic) and homoeologous (intergenomic) chromosomes paired at prophase. Foldbacks in single chromosomes, bivalents and trivalents were observed at prophase and metaphase I. At diakinesis, the associations involved a maximum of 20 chromosomes which decreased to 12 by metaphase I. This decrease was attributed to the failure of the non-homologous associations to persist until metaphase I. A hemizygous-ineffective control for the diploid-like behaviour of the hexaploid parodii is proposed to explain the homeologous chromosome pairing in its haploid derivatives.     

Genetic control of aluminium tolerance in rye (Secale cereale L.)

 Aluminium (Al) tolerance in roots of two cultivars (“Ailés” and “JNK”) and two inbred lines (“Riodeva” and “Pool”) of rye was studied using intact roots immersed in a nutrient solution at a controlled pH and temperature. Both the cultivars and the inbred lines analysed showed high Al tolerance, this character being under multigenic control. The inbred line “Riodeva” was sensitive (non-telerant) at a concentration of 150 μM, whereas the “Ailes” cultivar showed the highest level of Al tolerance at this concentration. The segregation of aluminium-tolerance genes and several isozyme loci in different F₁s, F₂s and backcrosses between plants of “Ailés” and “Riodeva” were also studied. The segregation ratios obtained for aluminium tolerance in the F₂s analysed were 3 : 1 and 15 : 1 (tolerant : non-tolerant) while in backcrosses they were 1 : 1 and 3 : 1. These results indicated that Al tolerance is controlled by, at least, two major dominant and independent loci in rye (Alt1 and Alt3). Linkage analyses carried out between Al-tolerance genes and several isozyme loci revealed that the Alt1 locus was linked to the aconitase-1 (Aco1), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide dehydrogenase-2 (Ndh2), esterase-6 (Est6) and esterase-8 (Est8) loci, located on chromosome arm 6RL. The order obtained was Alt1-Aco1-Ndh2-Est6-Est8. The Alt3 locus was not linked to the Lap1, Aco1 and Ndh2 loci, located on chromosome arms, 6RS, 6RL and 6RL respectively. Therefore, the Alt3 locus is probably on a different chromosome. Received: 18 March 1997 / Accepted: 21 March 1997     

Development of the synaptonemal complex and the “recombination nodules” during meiotic prophase in the seven bivalents of the fungus Sordaria macrospora Auersw

Complete reconstruction of seven leptotene, six zygotene, three pachytene and three diplotene nuclei has permitted to follow the pairing process in the Ascomycete Sordaria macrospora. The seven bivalents in Sordaria can be identified by their length. The lateral components of the synaptonemal complexes (SC) are formed just after karyogamy but are discontinuous at early leptotene. Their ends are evenly distributed on the nuclear envelope. The homologous chromosomes alignment occurs at late leptotene before SC formation. The precise pairing starts when a distance of 200–300 nm is reached. Each bivalent has several independent central component initiation sites with preferentially pairing starting near the nuclear envelope. These sites are located in a constant position along the different bivalents in the 6 observed nuclei. The seven bivalents are not synchronous either in the process of alignment or in SC formation: the small chromosomes are paired first. At pachytene the SC is completed in each of the 7 bivalents. Six bivalents have one fixed and one randomly attached telomeres. The fixed end of the nucleolar organizer is the nucleolus anchored end. At diffuse stage and diplotene, only small stretches of the SC are preserved. The lateral components increase in length is approximately 34% between leptotene and pachytene. Their lengths remain constant during pachytene. From zygotene to diplotene the central components contain local thickenings (nodules). At late zygotene and pachytene each bivalent has 1 to 4 nodules and the location of at least one is constant. The total number of nodules remains constant from pachytene to diplotene and is equal to the mean total number of chiasmata. The observations provide additional insight into meiotic processes such as chromosome movements, initiation and development of the pairing sites during zygotene, the existence of fixed telomeres, the variations in SC length. The correspondence between nodules and chiasmata are discussed.     

Meiotic disjunction and embryonic lethality in sex-linked double-translocation heterozygous males of the onion fly,Hylemya antiqua (Meigen)

Summary The frequencies of disjunction types in double-translocation heterozygous males (2⁶2^Y6²6XY²) in Hylemya antiqua have been established in MII cells and eggs of testcrosses.Several disjunction types occurred but four predominated. A correlation was found between the frequencies of the disjunction types and the relative position of the centromeres. The frequency of numerical non-disjunction (NND) was 4%. Differences in frequency of NND between sex-linked and autosomal translocations of H. antiqua are discussed. A good correspondence between the frequencies of unbalanced karyotypes, and embryonic and larval mortality was found. The total genetic load which can be induced by the T14/T61 males is estimated to be 60–65%. Some duplication/deficiency karyotypes appeared to be viable in pupal and even adult stages. In 2⁶2⁶2^Y6²6²X males a regular coorientation between 2^Y and X was observed, in spite of non-homologous centromeres and a complicated synapsis of 2^Y. Application possibilities of the present material for genetic control of H. antiqua are discussed.     

Similarities and differences between “uncapped” telomeres and DNA double-strand breaks

Telomeric DNA is present at the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes and is bound by telomere “capping” proteins, which are the (Cdc13–Stn1–Ten1) CST complex, Ku (Yku70–Yku80), and Rap1–Rif1–Rif2 in budding yeast. Inactivation of any of these complexes causes telomere “uncapping,” stimulating a DNA damage response (DDR) that frequently involves resection of telomeric DNA and stimulates cell cycle arrest. This is presumed to occur because telomeres resemble one half of a DNA double-strand break (DSB). In this review, we outline the DDR that occurs at DSBs and compare it to the DDR occurring at uncapped telomeres, in both budding yeast and metazoans. We give particular attention to the resection of DSBs in budding yeast by Mre11–Xrs2–Rad50 (MRX), Sgs1/Dna2, and Exo1 and compare their roles at DSBs and uncapped telomeres. We also discuss how resection uncapped telomeres in budding yeast is promoted by the by 9–1–1 complex (Rad17–Mec3–Ddc1), to illustrate how analysis of uncapped telomeres can serve as a model for the DDR elsewhere in the genome. Finally, we discuss the role of the helicase Pif1 and its requirement for resection of uncapped telomeres, but not DSBs. Pif1 has roles in DNA replication and mammalian and plant CST complexes have been identified and have roles in global genome replication. Based on these observations, we suggest that while the DDR at uncapped telomeres is partially due to their resemblance to a DSB, it may also be partially due to defective DNA replication. Specifically, we propose that the budding yeast CST complex has dual roles to inhibit a DSB-like DDR initiated by Exo1 and a replication-associated DDR initiated by Pif1. If true, this would suggest that the mammalian CST complex inhibits a Pif1-dependent DDR.     

Dicentric chromosomes and the inactivation of the centromere

Summary The origin and behavior of human dicentric chromosomes are reviewed. Most dicentrics between two non-homologous or two homologous chromosomes (isodicentrics), which are permanent members of a chromosome complement, probably originate from segregation of an adjacent quadriradial; such configurations are the result of a chromatid translocation between two nonhomologous chromosomes, or they represent an adjacent counterpart of a mitotic chiasma. The segregation of such a quadriradial may also give rise to a cell line monosomic for the chromosome concerned (e.g., a 45,X line). Contrary to the generally held opinion, isodicentrics rarely result from an isolocal break in two chromatids followed by rejoining of sister chromatids. In this case the daughter centromeres go to opposite poles in the next anaphase, and the resulting bridge breaks at a random point. This mechanism, therefore, leads to the formation of an isodicentric chromosome only if the two centromeres are close together, or if one centromere is immediately inactivated. Observations on the origin of dicentrics in Bloom syndrome support these conclusions. One centromere is permanently inactivated in most dicentric chromosomes, and even when the dicentric breaks into two chromosomes, the centromere is not reactivated. The appearance and behavior of the acentric X chromosomes show that their centromeres are similarly inactivated and not prematurely divided. Two Bloom syndrome lymphocytes, one with an extra chromosome 2 and the other with an extra chromosome 7, each having an inactivated centromere, show that this can also happen in monocentric autosomes.     

Ahp2 (Hop2) function in Arabidopsis thaliana (Ler) is required for stabilization of close alignment and synaptonemal complex formation except for the two short arms that contain nucleolus organizer regions

A cytological comparative analysis of male meiocytes was performed for Arabidopsis wild type and the ahp2 (hop2) mutant with emphasis on ahp2’s largely uncharacterized prophase I. Leptotene progression appeared normal in ahp2 meiocytes; chromosomes exhibited regular axis formation and assumed a typical polarized nuclear organization. In contrast, 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole-stained ahp2 pachytene chromosome spreads demonstrated a severe reduction in stabilized pairing. However, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis of sections from meiocytes revealed that ahp2 chromosome axes underwent significant amounts of close alignment (44% of total axis). This apparent paradox strongly suggests that the Ahp2 protein is involved in the stabilization of homologous chromosome close alignment. Fluorescent in situ hybridization in combination with Zyp1 immunostaining revealed that ahp2 mutants undergo homologous synapsis of the nucleolus-organizer-region-bearing short arms of chromosomes 2 and 4, despite the otherwise “nucleus-wide” lack of stabilized pairing. The duration of ahp2 zygotene was significantly prolonged and is most likely due to difficulties in chromosome alignment stabilization and subsequent synaptonemal complex formation. Ahp2 and Mnd1 proteins have previously been shown, “in vitro,” to form a heterodimer. Here we show, “in situ,” that the Ahp2 and Mnd1 proteins are synchronous in their appearance and disappearance from meiotic chromosomes. Both the Ahp2 and Mnd1 proteins localize along the chromosomal axis. However, localization of the Ahp2 protein was entirely foci-based whereas Mnd1 protein exhibited an immunostaining pattern with some foci along the axis and a diffuse staining for the rest of the chromosome.     

A novel fission yeast gene, kms1 +, is required for the formation of meiotic prophase-specific nuclear architecture

In the meiotic prophase nucleus of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, chromosomes are arranged in an oriented manner: telomeres cluster in close proximity to the spindle pole body (SPB), while centromeres form another cluster at some distance from the SPB. We have isolated a mutant, kms1, in which the structure of the meiotic prophase nucleus appears to be distorted. Using specific probes to localize the SPB and telomeres, multiple signals were observed in the mutant nuclei, in contrast to the case in wild-type. Genetic analysis showed that in the mutant, meiotic recombination frequency was reduced to about one-quarter of the wild-type level and meiotic segregation was impaired. This phenotype strongly suggests that the telomere-led rearrangement of chromosomal distribution that normally occurs in the fission yeast meiotic nucleus is an important prerequisite for the efficient pairing of homologous chromosomes. The kms1 mutant was also impaired in karyogamy, suggesting that the kms1 ⁺ gene is involved in SPB function. However, the kms1 ⁺ gene is dispensable for mitotic growth. The predicted amino acid sequence of the gene product shows no significant similarity to known proteins. Received: 5 September 1996 / Accepted: 21 November 1996     

Arrangement of chromatin in the nucleus

Summary The factors responsible for producing some degree of order to the arrangement of chromatin in the nucleus are reviewed. They are the following: 1. Chromosomes are attached to the nuclear membrane, nucleolus and intranuclear matrix. As a result they have a relatively fixed position in the nucleus. 2. In some species somatic pairing results in alignment of homologs. This is rare in mammals. 3. The association of ribosomal DNA and 5S DNA with the nucleolous results in the close approximation of the chromosomes carrying these DNA sequences. In man and other animals the most obvious consequence is satellite association. 4. Heterochromatin is condensed onto the inner nuclear membrane and periphery of the nucleolous while genetically active chromatin occupies the more central portion of the nucleus. The results is a peripheral location of late replicating DNA and a central location of early relicating DNA. 5. The DNA replication points tend to be associated with the nuclear matrix. Autoradiography of briefly labelled cells shows a high frequency of grains associated with nuclear matrix material. 6. Heterochromatin association results in chromocenters and ectopic pairing. 7. In addition to all these is the Rabl orientation or alignment of centromeres with centromeres and telomeres with telomeres. This polarization of the chromosomes results from the traction on the centromeres by the spindle fibers. There is no firm evidence for any higher degrees of order that might bring specific functioning genes into close proximity.Supported by NIH Grant GM 15886     

Chromosome organization in wheat endosperm and embryo

We have analysed the chromosome organization in endosperm and embryo of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), in order to compare these tissues with developing anthers, in which the centromeres associate, and the developing root xylem vessel cells, in which the chromosomes endoreduplicate to become polytene and associate via their centromeres. Both endosperm and embryo showed a typical Rabl configuration and a degree of non-homologous centromere association and the endosperm also showed extensive telomere association. Wheat endosperm is initially triploid and during its development a percentage of the nuclei increase their DNA content to 6C and 12C. 6C nuclei showed twice as many centromeres as 3C nuclei and the centromere number increased further in 12C nuclei. The higher the C-content of a nucleus the more the telomeres associated in endosperm. The vast majority of 12C nuclei showed six rye chromosome arms, although a few showed three associated groups of rye chromosome arms. This means that during endosperm development wheat nuclei show both polyploidization and polytenization.