Cognitive behaviour therapy for adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome: randomised controlled trial

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of cognitive behaviour therapy for adolescents aged 10-17 years with chronic fatigue syndrome.Design Randomised controlled trial.Setting Department of child psychology.Participants 71 consecutively referred patients with chronic fatigue syndrome; 36 were randomly assigned to immediate cognitive behaviour therapy and 35 to the waiting list for therapy.Intervention 10 sessions of therapy over five months. Treatment protocols depended on the type of activity pattern (relatively active or passive). All participants were assessed again after five months.Main outcome measures Fatigue severity (checklist individual strength), functional impairment (SF-36 physical functioning), and school attendance.Results 62 patients had complete data at five months (29 in the immediate therapy group and 33 on the waiting list). Patients in the therapy group reported significantly greater decrease in fatigue severity (difference in decrease on checklist individual strength was 14.5, 95% confidence interval 7.4 to 21.6) and functional impairment (difference in increase on SF-36 physical functioning was 17.3, 6.2 to 28.4) and their attendance at school increased significantly (difference in increase in percentage school attendance was 18.2, 0.8 to 35.5). They also reported a significant reduction in several accompanying symptoms. Self reported improvement was largest in the therapy group.Conclusion Cognitive behaviour therapy is an effective treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome in adolescents.     

The Association between Daytime Napping and Cognitive Functioning in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Objectives

The precise relationship between sleep and physical and mental functioning in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) has not been examined directly, nor has the impact of daytime napping. This study aimed to examine self-reported sleep in patients with CFS and explore whether sleep quality and daytime napping, specific patient characteristics (gender, illness length) and levels of anxiety and depression, predicted daytime fatigue severity, levels of daytime sleepiness and cognitive functioning, all key dimensions of the illness experience.

Methods

118 adults meeting the 1994 CDC case criteria for CFS completed a standardised sleep diary over 14 days. Momentary functional assessments of fatigue, sleepiness, cognition and mood were completed by patients as part of usual care. Levels of daytime functioning and disability were quantified using symptom assessment tools, measuring fatigue (Chalder Fatigue Scale), sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), cognitive functioning (Trail Making Test, Cognitive Failures Questionnaire), and mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale).

Results

Hierarchical Regressions demonstrated that a shorter time since diagnosis, higher depression and longer wake time after sleep onset predicted 23.4% of the variance in fatigue severity (p <.001). Being male, higher depression and more afternoon naps predicted 25.6% of the variance in objective cognitive dysfunction (p <.001). Higher anxiety and depression and morning napping predicted 32.2% of the variance in subjective cognitive dysfunction (p <.001). When patients were classified into groups of mild and moderate sleepiness, those with longer daytime naps, those who mainly napped in the afternoon, and those with higher levels of anxiety, were more likely to be in the moderately sleepy group.

Conclusions

Napping, particularly in the afternoon is associated with poorer cognitive functioning and more daytime sleepiness in CFS. These findings have clinical implications for symptom management strategies.     

Protocol for the PACE trial: A randomised controlled trial of adaptive pacing, cognitive behaviour therapy, and graded exercise as supplements to standardised specialist medical care versus standardised specialist medical care alone for patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis or encephalopathy

Background

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS, also called myalgic encephalomyelitis/encephalopathy or ME) is a debilitating condition with no known cause or cure. Improvement may occur with medical care and additional therapies of pacing, cognitive behavioural therapy and graded exercise therapy. The latter two therapies have been found to be efficacious in small trials, but patient organisations' surveys have reported adverse effects. Although pacing has been advocated by patient organisations, it lacks empirical support. Specialist medical care is commonly provided but its efficacy when given alone is not established. This trial compares the efficacy of the additional therapies when added to specialist medical care against specialist medical care alone.

Methods/Design

600 patients, who meet operationalised diagnostic criteria for CFS, will be recruited from secondary care into a randomised trial of four treatments, stratified by current comorbid depressive episode and different CFS/ME criteria. The four treatments are standardised specialist medical care either given alone, or with adaptive pacing therapy or cognitive behaviour therapy or graded exercise therapy. Supplementary therapies will involve fourteen sessions over 23 weeks and a 'booster session' at 36 weeks. Outcome will be assessed at 12, 24, and 52 weeks after randomisation. Two primary outcomes of self-rated fatigue and physical function will assess differential effects of each treatment on these measures. Secondary outcomes include adverse events and reactions, subjective measures of symptoms, mood, sleep and function and objective measures of physical activity, fitness, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility. The primary analysis will be based on intention to treat and will use logistic regression models to compare treatments. Secondary outcomes will be analysed by repeated measures analysis of variance with a linear mixed model. All analyses will allow for stratification factors. Mediators and moderators will be explored using multiple linear and logistic regression techniques with interactive terms, with the sample split into two to allow validation of the initial models. Economic analyses will incorporate sensitivity measures.

Discussion

The results of the trial will provide information about the benefits and adverse effects of these treatments, their cost-effectiveness and cost-utility, the process of clinical improvement and the predictors of efficacy.     

Longitudinal study of outcome of chronic fatigue syndrome.

OBJECTIVE--To examine the predictors of long term outcome for patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome. DESIGN--Cohort study. SUBJECTS--139 subjects previously enrolled in two treatment trials; 103 (74%) were reassessed a mean of 3.2 years after start of the trials. SETTING--University hospital referral centre. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Age at onset, duration of illness, psychological and immunological status at initial assessment. Ongoing symptom severity, levels of disability, and immunological function at follow up. RESULTS--65 subjects had improved but only six reported no current symptoms. An alternative medical diagnosis had been made in two and psychiatric illness diagnosed in 20. The assignment of a primary psychiatric diagnosis at follow up and the strength of the belief that a physical disease process explained all symptoms at entry to the trials both predicted poor outcome. Age at onset of illness, duration of illness, neuroticism, premorbid psychiatric diagnoses, and cell mediated immune function did not predict outcome. CONCLUSION--Though most patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome improve, a substantial proportion remain functionally impaired. Psychological factors such as illness attitudes and coping style seem more important predictors of long term outcome than immunological or demographic variables.     

Adaptive pacing, cognitive behaviour therapy, graded exercise, and specialist medical care for chronic fatigue syndrome: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Background

The PACE trial compared the effectiveness of adding adaptive pacing therapy (APT), cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT), or graded exercise therapy (GET), to specialist medical care (SMC) for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. This paper reports the relative cost-effectiveness of these treatments in terms of quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and improvements in fatigue and physical function.

Methods

Resource use was measured and costs calculated. Healthcare and societal costs (healthcare plus lost production and unpaid informal care) were combined with QALYs gained, and changes in fatigue and disability; incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were computed.

Results

SMC patients had significantly lower healthcare costs than those receiving APT, CBT and GET. If society is willing to value a QALY at £30,000 there is a 62.7% likelihood that CBT is the most cost-effective therapy, a 26.8% likelihood that GET is most cost effective, 2.6% that APT is most cost-effective and 7.9% that SMC alone is most cost-effective. Compared to SMC alone, the incremental healthcare cost per QALY was £18,374 for CBT, £23,615 for GET and £55,235 for APT. From a societal perspective CBT has a 59.5% likelihood of being the most cost-effective, GET 34.8%, APT 0.2% and SMC alone 5.5%. CBT and GET dominated SMC, while APT had a cost per QALY of £127,047. ICERs using reductions in fatigue and disability as outcomes largely mirrored these findings.

Conclusions

Comparing the four treatments using a health care perspective, CBT had the greatest probability of being the most cost-effective followed by GET. APT had a lower probability of being the most cost-effective option than SMC alone. The relative cost-effectiveness was even greater from a societal perspective as additional cost savings due to reduced need for informal care were likely.     

Abnormalities of sleep in patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome.

OBJECTIVE--To determine whether patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome have abnormalities of sleep which may contribute to daytime fatigue. DESIGN--A case-control study of the sleep of patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome and that of healthy volunteers. SETTING--An infectious disease outpatient clinic and subjects'' homes. SUBJECTS--12 patients who met research criteria for the chronic fatigue syndrome but not for major depressive disorder and 12 healthy controls matched for age, sex, and weight. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Subjective reports of sleep from patients'' diaries and measurement of sleep patterns by polysomnography. Subjects'' anxiety, depression, and functional impairment were assessed by interview. RESULTS--Patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome spent more time in bed than controls (544 min v 465 min, p < 0.001) but slept less efficiently (90% v 96%, p < 0.05) and spent more time awake after initially going to sleep (31.9 min v 16.6 min, p < 0.05). Seven patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome had a sleep disorder (four had difficulty maintaining sleep, one had difficulty getting to sleep, one had difficulty in both initiating and maintaining sleep, and one had hypersomnia) compared with none of the controls (p = 0.003). Those with sleep disorders showed greater functional impairment than the remaining five patients (score on general health survey 50.4% v 70.4%, p < 0.05), but their psychiatric scores were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS--Most patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome had sleep disorders, which are likely to contribute to daytime fatigue. Sleep disorders may be important in the aetiology of the syndrome.     

Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of two internet interventions for community-dwelling individuals with symptoms of depression—a psychoeducation website offering information about depression and an interactive website offering cognitive behaviour therapy.Design Randomised controlled trial.Setting Internet users in the community, in Canberra, Australia.Participants 525 individuals with increased depressive symptoms recruited by survey and randomly allocated to a website offering information about depression (n = 166) or a cognitive behaviour therapy website (n = 182), or a control intervention using an attention placebo (n = 178).Main outcome measures Change in depression, dysfunctional thoughts; knowledge of medical, psychological, and lifestyle treatments; and knowledge of cognitive behaviour therapy.Results Intention to treat analyses indicated that information about depression and interventions that used cognitive behaviour therapy and were delivered via the internet were more effective than a credible control intervention in reducing symptoms of depression in a community sample. For the intervention that delivered cognitive behaviour therapy the reduction in score on the depression scale of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies was 3.2 (95% confidence interval 0.9 to 5.4). For the “depression literacy” site (BluePages), the reduction was 3.0 (95% confidence interval 0.6 to 5.2). Cognitive behaviour therapy (MoodGYM) reduced dysfunctional thinking and increased knowledge of cognitive behaviour therapy. Depression literacy (BluePages) significantly improved participants'' understanding of effective evidence based treatments for depression (P < 0.05).Conclusions Both cognitive behaviour therapy and psychoeducation delivered via the internet are effective in reducing symptoms of depression.     

Randomised controlled trial of graded exercise in patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of a graded aerobic exercise programme in the chronic fatigue syndrome. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with control treatment crossover after the first follow up examination. SETTING: Chronic fatigue clinic in a general hospital department of psychiatry. SUBJECTS: 66 patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome who had neither a psychiatric disorder nor appreciable sleep disturbance. INTERVENTIONS: Random allocation to 12 weeks of either graded aerobic exercise or flexibility exercises and relaxation therapy. Patients who completed the flexibility programme were invited to cross over to the exercise programme afterwards. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The self rated clinical global impression change score, "very much better" or "much better" being considered as clinically important. RESULTS: Four patients receiving exercise and three receiving flexibility treatment dropped out before completion. 15 of 29 patients rated themselves as better after completing exercise treatment compared with eight of 30 patients who completed flexibility treatment. Analysis by intention to treat gave similar results (17/33 v 9/33 patients better). Fatigue, functional capacity, and fitness were significantly better after exercise than after flexibility treatment. 12 of 22 patients who crossed over to exercise after flexibility treatment rated themselves as better after completing exercise treatment 32 of 47 patients rated themselves as better three months after completing supervised exercise treatment 35 of 47 patients rated themselves as better one year after completing supervised exercise treatment. CONCLUSION: These findings support the use of appropriately prescribed graded aerobic exercise in the management of patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome.     

Cognitive behavioural therapy versus multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (FatiGo)

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) experience extreme fatigue which often leads to substantial limitations of occupational, educational, social and personal activities. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the treatment of patients with CFS. Patients try many different therapies to overcome their fatigue. Although there is no consensus, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) is seen as one of the most effective treatments. Little is known about multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment (MRT), a combination of CBT with principles of mindfulness, gradual increase of activities, body awareness therapy and pacing. The difference in effectiveness and cost-effectiveness between MRT and CBT for treatment of patients with CFS is as yet unknown. The FatiGo (Fatigue-Go) trial aims to compare the effects of both treatment approaches in outpatient rehabilitation on fatigue severity and quality of life in patients with CFS. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients, who meet the criteria of CFS, fulfil the inclusion criteria and signed the informed consent form, will be recruited into a randomised controlled trial. Both treatments, CBT and MRT, take 6 months to complete. Outcome will be assessed at 6 and 12 months after start of treatment. Two weeks after start of treatment, expectancy and credibility will be measured and patients are asked to write down their personal goals and score their current performance on these goals on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). At 6 and 14 weeks after start of treatment, primary outcome and three potential mediators; self-efficacy, causal attributions, present-centred attention-awareness, will be measured. Primary outcomes are fatigue severity and quality of life. Secondary outcomes are physical activity, psychological symptoms, self-efficacy, causal attributions, impact of disease on emotional and physical functioning, present-centred attention-awareness, life satisfaction, patient personal goals, self rated improvement and economic costs. The primary analysis will be based on intention to treat and longitudinal analysis of covariance will be used to compare treatments. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN77567702. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the trial will provide information on the effects of CBT and MRT at 6 and 12 months follow up, mediators of the outcome, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, and the influence of treatment expectancy and credibility on the effectiveness of both treatments in patients with CFS.     

Discrepanties tussen de Informantvragenlijst (IQCODE) en cognitieve tests bij deelnemers aan psychogeriatrische dagbehandeling

Discrepancies between the IQCODE (Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly) and cognitive test performance Objectives. The IQCODE is an informant-rated scale of estimated cognitive decline. This study examined the scalability of the 16-item form of the IQCODE and its validity to predict performance on a comprehensive cognitive battery. Methods. The medical files of 169 psychogeriatric day care attendants contained an IQCODE. Mokken’s nonparametric item response model for polytomous items was used to assess the unidimensionality of the IQCODE. Tests of orientation, episodic memory and executive functioning (Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale, Category Fluency, and Expanded Mental Control Test) were administered in order to examine predictive validity. Results. H_i-coefficients of scalability for the 16 items of the IQCODE ranged from 0.33 to 0.50. Loevinger’s H was 0.40 for he full scale, which makes it a moderately strong, unidimensional scale. A ‘strong’ scale (H=0.54) was found by selecting a subset of seven items, representing the latent construct of problem solving ability. The correlations of the total IQCODE score with neuropsychological tests differed significantly from zero but the coefficients were quite small, ranging from -0.12 to -0.25. A nonparametric optimal discriminant analysis (ODA) was used to derive a cutoff score for the IQCODE that would maximize the classification accuracy in differentiating patients with comparatively high or low levels of cognitive functioning. Given an effect strength for sensitivity (ESS) of 21%, the optimal IQCODE cutoff score (3.75) did not reliably discriminate between different levels of cognitive ability. More than half of the patients (56%) who were predicted to belong to a group of low cognitive ability, in fact performed at a higher level. Conversely, overestimation of cognitive ability occurred less often (20%). Conclusions. In this sample of psychogeriatric day care attendants the IQCODE tended to underestimate the patient’s cognitive scores. In order to understand deficits or find remaining competencies, direct assessment of cognitive abilities may be preferred to informant based measures. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 2007; 38: 225-236     

Effect of aerobic exercise training and cognitive behavioural therapy on reduction of chronic fatigue in patients with facioscapulohumeral dystrophy: protocol of the FACTS-2-FSHD trial

Background

In facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) muscle function is impaired and declines over time. Currently there is no effective treatment available to slow down this decline. We have previously reported that loss of muscle strength contributes to chronic fatigue through a decreased level of physical activity, while fatigue and physical inactivity both determine loss of societal participation. To decrease chronic fatigue, two distinctly different therapeutic approaches can be proposed: aerobic exercise training (AET) to improve physical capacity and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) to stimulate an active life-style yet avoiding excessive physical strain. The primary aim of the FACTS-2-FSHD (acronym for Fitness And Cognitive behavioural TherapieS/for Fatigue and ACTivitieS in FSHD) trial is to study the effect of AET and CBT on the reduction of chronic fatigue as assessed with the Checklist Individual Strength subscale fatigue (CIS-fatigue) in patients with FSHD. Additionally, possible working mechanisms and the effects on various secondary outcome measures at all levels of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) are evaluated.

Methods/Design

A multi-centre, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial is conducted. A sample of 75 FSHD patients with severe chronic fatigue (CIS-fatigue ≥ 35) will be recruited and randomized to one of three groups: (1) AET + usual care, (2) CBT + usual care or (3) usual care alone, which consists of no therapy at all or occasional (conventional) physical therapy. After an intervention period of 16 weeks and a follow-up of 3 months, the third (control) group will as yet be randomized to either AET or CBT (approximately 7 months after inclusion). Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, immediately post intervention and at 3 and 6 months follow up.

Discussion

The FACTS-2-FSHD study is the first theory-based randomized clinical trial which evaluates the effect and the maintenance of effects of AET and CBT on the reduction of chronic fatigue in patients with FSHD. The interventions are based on a theoretical model of chronic fatigue in patients with FSHD. The study will provide a unique set of data with which the relationships between outcome measures at all levels of the ICF could be assessed.

Trial registration

Dutch Trial Register, NTR1447.

     

CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME BEGINNING SUDDENLY OCCURS SEASONALLY OVER THE YEAR

The fact that many patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) have an infectiouslike sudden onset to their illness has led to the hypothesis that CFS is a medical illness. If CFS were, on the other hand, a psychiatric disorder related to symptom amplification, one would expect illness onset to occur randomly over the calendar year. This study tested that hypothesis with 69 CFS patients whose illness was on the more severe side of the illness spectrum; all patients reported sudden illness onset with the full syndrome of sore throat, fatigue/malaise, and diffuse achiness developing over no longer than a 2-day period. Date of illness onset was distinctly nonrandom. It peaked from November through January and was at its lowest from April through May. These data support the hypothesis that an infectious illness can trigger the onset of CFS. (Chronobiology International, 17(1), 95–99, 2000).

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a medically unexplained illness characterized by fatigue, pain, and cognitive complaints. Because many of the symptoms of CFS overlap with those of depression, some argue that CFS is a somatic manifestation of depression or a somatoform disorder. Komaroff (1988) has suggested that, because CFS patients develop their illness suddenly with an infectiouslike presentation, this supports an underlying medical etiology to the illness. If CFS were indeed triggered by an infectious illness, one would expect to find the dates of sudden illness onset to occur more often in months when viral infections are common. If CFS were a somatoform disorder, one would expect a random distribution of dates of illness onset across the calendar year. Since our center has a large number of CFS patients who report a sudden infectiouslike illness onset, the purpose of this paper was to determine if the dates of illness onset occurred randomly or nonrandomly across the calendar year.     

Chronic fatigue syndrome beginning suddenly occurs seasonally over the year

The fact that many patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) have an infectiouslike sudden onset to their illness has led to the hypothesis that CFS is a medical illness. If CFS were, on the other hand, a psychiatric disorder related to symptom amplification, one would expect illness onset to occur randomly over the calendar year. This study tested that hypothesis with 69 CFS patients whose illness was on the more severe side of the illness spectrum; all patients reported sudden illness onset with the full syndrome of sore throat, fatigue/malaise, and diffuse achiness developing over no longer than a 2-day period. Date of illness onset was distinctly nonrandom. It peaked from November through January and was at its lowest from April through May. These data support the hypothesis that an infectious illness can trigger the onset of CFS. (Chronobiology International, 17(1), 95-99, 2000).

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a medically unexplained illness characterized by fatigue, pain, and cognitive complaints. Because many of the symptoms of CFS overlap with those of depression, some argue that CFS is a somatic manifestation of depression or a somatoform disorder. Komaroff (1988) has suggested that, because CFS patients develop their illness suddenly with an infectiouslike presentation, this supports an underlying medical etiology to the illness. If CFS were indeed triggered by an infectious illness, one would expect to find the dates of sudden illness onset to occur more often in months when viral infections are common. If CFS were a somatoform disorder, one would expect a random distribution of dates of illness onset across the calendar year. Since our center has a large number of CFS patients who report a sudden infectiouslike illness onset, the purpose of this paper was to determine if the dates of illness onset occurred randomly or nonrandomly across the calendar year.     

Effectiveness of teaching general practitioners skills in brief cognitive behaviour therapy to treat patients with depression: randomised controlled trial

ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of teaching general practitioners skills in brief cognitive behaviour therapy.DesignParallel group, cluster randomised, controlled trial of an educational package on cognitive behaviour therapy.SettingGeneral practices in north London.Participants84 general practitioner principals and 272 patients attending their practices who scored above the threshold for psychological distress on the hospital anxiety and depression scale.InterventionA training package of four half days on brief cognitive behaviour therapy.ResultsDoctors'' knowledge of depression and attitudes towards its treatment showed no major difference between intervention and control groups after 6 months. The training had no discernible impact on patients'' outcomes.ConclusionGeneral practitioners may require more training and support than a basic educational package on brief cognitive behaviour therapy to acquire skills to help patients with depression.

What is already known on this topic

Trained professionals can deliver effective cognitive behaviour therapy to depressed patients presenting to general practitionersLimited evidence shows that cognitive behaviour therapy is effective when delivered by general practitioners who have received extensive instructionMost doctors do not have the time or inclination to carry out such comprehensive training

What this study adds

Basic training in brief cognitive behaviour therapy has little effect on general practitioners'' attitudes to the identification and treatment of depression or the outcome of their patients with emotional problemsGeneral practitioners may require more extensive training and support if they are to acquire skills in brief cognitive behaviour therapy that will have a positive impact on their patients     

Professional and popular views of chronic fatigue syndrome.

OBJECTIVE--To study the coverage of the chronic fatigue syndrome in the popular and professional press. DESIGN--Search of all original research papers on the chronic fatigue syndrome published in British journals from 1980 onwards and of professional trade papers, national newspapers, and women''s magazines. Interviews with six medical journalists. SETTING--British scientific, medical, and popular press. RESULTS--37 (49%) articles in research journals did not favour organic causes and 23 (31%) favoured organic causes. By contrast 31 (55%) articles in the medical trade press and 118 (69%) in national newspapers and women''s magazines favoured organic causes. CONCLUSIONS--Press coverage of chronic fatigue syndrome has amplified and distorted divisions in the research community concerning the chronic fatigue syndrome. Articles in the press concentrate on a simple medical model of illness reinforcing the stigma of psychological illness and dissatisfaction with traditional medical authority.     

Transactions of the One Hundredth Annual Meeting of The Canadian Medical Association: Part II

The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare (1) regular methadone withdrawal treatment and (2) prolonged methadone withdrawal treatment in 105 and 71 voluntary patients respectively, who attended the Narcotic Addiction Foundation (N.A.F.) between 1959 and mid-1964. Treatment consisted of individual counselling and medical care for all, and only residential care and psychiatric assessment for selected cases. The number of treatment sessions and the details of drug therapy are described.One hundred and fifty-three of 176 patients (87%) were interviewed approximately one to five years after the first clinic contact. Forty-three per cent showed some overall improvement in their behaviour. Rehabilitation was defined as change in a specific area—drug use, work, criminal behaviour, community associations, friendship patterns and family relationships—rather than in terms of abstention from drugs only. Age affected comparative results.     

Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial

Objectives To assess the clinical effectiveness of surgical stabilisation (spinal fusion) compared with intensive rehabilitation for patients with chronic low back pain.Design Multicentre randomised controlled trial.Setting 15 secondary care orthopaedic and rehabilitation centres across the United Kingdom.Participants 349 participants aged 18-55 with chronic low back pain of at least one year''s duration who were considered candidates for spinal fusion.Intervention Lumbar spine fusion or an intensive rehabilitation programme based on principles of cognitive behaviour therapy.Main outcome measure The primary outcomes were the Oswestry disability index and the shuttle walking test measured at baseline and two years after randomisation. The SF-36 instrument was used as a secondary outcome measure.Results 176 participants were assigned to surgery and 173 to rehabilitation. 284 (81%) provided follow-up data at 24 months. The mean Oswestry disability index changed favourably from 46.5 (SD 14.6) to 34.0 (SD 21.1) in the surgery group and from 44.8 (SD14.8) to 36.1 (SD 20.6) in the rehabilitation group. The estimated mean difference between the groups was –4.1 (95% confidence interval –8.1 to –0.1, P = 0.045) in favour of surgery. No significant differences between the treatment groups were observed in the shuttle walking test or any of the other outcome measures.Conclusions Both groups reported reductions in disability during two years of follow-up, possibly unrelated to the interventions. The statistical difference between treatment groups in one of the two primary outcome measures was marginal and only just reached the predefined minimal clinical difference, and the potential risk and additional cost of surgery also need to be considered. No clear evidence emerged that primary spinal fusion surgery was any more beneficial than intensive rehabilitation.     

Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient generated measure,MYMOP, compared with the SF-36 health survey.

OBJECTIVE--To assess the sensitivity to within person change over time of an outcome measure for practitioners in primary care that is applicable to a wide range of illness. DESIGN--Comparison of a new patient generated instrument, the measure yourself medical outcome profile (MYMOP), with the SF-36 health profile and a five point change score; all scales were completed during the consultation with'' practitioners and repeated after four weeks. 103 patients were followed up for 16 weeks and their results charted; seven practitioners were interviewed. SETTING--Established practice of the four NHS general practitioners and four of the private complementary practitioners working in one medical centre. SUBJECTS--Systematic sample of 218 patients from general practice and all 47 patients of complementary practitioners; patients had had symptoms for more than seven days. OUTCOME MEASURES--Standardised response mean and index of responsiveness; view of practitioners. RESULTS--The index of responsiveness, relating to the minimal clinically important difference, was high for MYMOP: 1.4 for the first symptom, 1.33 for activity, and 0.85 for the profile compared with < 0.45 for SF-36. MYMOP''s validity was supported by significant correlation between the change score and the change in the MYMOP score and the ability of this instrument to detect more improvement in acute than in chronic conditions. Practitioners found that MYMOP was practical and applicable to all patients with symptoms and that its use increased their awareness of patients'' priorities. CONCLUSION--MYMOP shows promise as an outcome measure for primary care and for complementary treatment. It is more sensitive to change than the SF-36 and has the added bonus of improving patient-practitioner communication.     

蒙特利尔认知评估量表在血管性认知功能障碍中的应用分析

目的:研究蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)诊断临界值在宁夏回族自治区患有血管性认知功能障碍(VCI)中的应用价值。方法:对宁夏回族自治区人民医院神经内科住院治疗的126例脑血管功能性认知缺陷患者分为非痴呆性血管认知功能障碍(VCIND)组53例、认知功能正常(NCI)组47例和血管性痴呆(VaD)组26例,分别予以简易精神状态量表(MMSE)和MoCA进行认知能力检测,分析比较三组患者的诊断效果。结果:将认知功能障碍MoCA临界值26分定义认知功能障碍时,VCIND组MoCA评分结果显示敏感度86.8%、准确度94.3%;VaD组敏感度100.0%、准确度88.5%与MMSE比较均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:采用MoCA在VCI筛查评估中的诊断效果极佳,具有良好的敏感性、特异度和信度,临床推荐应用。     

Aesthetic outcomes in patients undergoing breast conservation therapy for the treatment of localized breast cancer

Localized breast cancer can be treated with lumpectomy and postoperative radiation therapy, also called breast conservation therapy, with an efficacy equivalent to that of mastectomy. Reports evaluating the effects of radiotherapy suggested that breast conservation therapy had "acceptable" cosmetic outcomes; thus, posttreatment evaluation for aesthetic impact has not been instituted as a standard of care. More recent reports have suggested that the effect of breast conservation therapy on aesthetic outcome is not minimal and that patients may benefit from reconstructive consultation. The purpose of this study was to measure objectively the aesthetic change in women who undergo breast conservation therapy and whether the extent of change is significant enough (objectively and subjectively) to warrant plastic surgery consultation. The authors evaluated 21 patients who had undergone breast conservation therapy. Eleven non-breast cancer patients seeking plastic surgery consultation were used as controls. Standardized five-view photographs (frontal, left and right lateral, and left and right lateral oblique views) were obtained. Patient photograph sets were compiled and evaluated independently by eight reviewers (four surgeons, two nurses, and two medical students). Reviewers evaluated the photographs using the breast asymmetry score (score range, 0 to 9) assessing breast size, ptosis, nipple-areola position, shape, scar appearance, contour deformity, and skin changes. The authors considered 2 SD above the control mean as significant. Breast conservation therapy patients also completed a 15-item questionnaire targeting objective and subjective data about treatment-related breast change. Breast conservation therapy patients had an average treatment-related asymmetry score of 1.93, with 35 percent demonstrating significant change as compared with controls. Although most patients (86 percent) were satisfied with the cancer treatment outcome, all patients noted asymmetry. The authors' data indicate that breast conservation therapy can cause significant asymmetry; thus, an option for plastic surgery consultation as part of the treatment protocol is warranted.