Functionally different agonists induce distinct conformations in the G protein coupling domain of the beta 2 adrenergic receptor

G protein-coupled receptors represent the largest class of drug discovery targets. Drugs that activate G protein-coupled receptors are classified as either agonists or partial agonists. To study the mechanism whereby these different classes of activating ligands modulate receptor function, we directly monitored ligand-induced conformational changes in the G protein-coupling domain of the beta(2) adrenergic receptor. Fluorescence lifetime analysis of a reporter fluorophore covalently attached to this domain revealed that, in the absence of ligands, this domain oscillates around a single detectable conformation. Binding to an antagonist does not change this conformation but does reduce the flexibility of the domain. However, when the beta(2) adrenergic receptor is bound to a full agonist, the G protein coupling domain exists in two distinct conformations. Moreover, the conformations induced by a full agonist can be distinguished from those induced by partial agonists. These results provide new insight into the structural consequence of antagonist binding and the basis of agonism and partial agonism.     

Ligand-stabilized conformational states of human beta(2) adrenergic receptor: insight into G-protein-coupled receptor activation

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are known to exist in dynamic equilibrium between inactive- and several active-state conformations, even in the absence of a ligand. Recent experimental studies on the β₂ adrenergic receptor (β₂AR) indicate that structurally different ligands with varying efficacies trigger distinct conformational changes and stabilize different receptor conformations. We have developed a computational method to study the ligand-induced rotational orientation changes in the transmembrane helices of GPCRs. This method involves a systematic spanning of the rotational orientation of the transmembrane helices (TMs) that are in the vicinity of the ligand for predicting the helical rotations that occur on ligand binding. The predicted ligand-stabilized receptor conformations are characterized by a simultaneous lowering of the ligand binding energy and a significant gain in interhelical and receptor-ligand hydrogen bonds. Using the β₂AR as a model, we show that the receptor conformational state depends on the structure and efficacy of the ligand for a given signaling pathway. We have studied the ligand-stabilized receptor conformations of five different ligands, a full agonist, norepinephrine; a partial agonist, salbutamol; a weak partial agonist, dopamine; a very weak agonist, catechol; and an inverse agonist, ICI-115881. The predicted ligand-stabilized receptor models correlate well with the experimentally observed conformational switches in β₂AR, namely, the breaking of the ionic lock between R131^3.50 at the intracellular end of TM3 (part of the DRY motif) and E268^6.30 on TM6, and the rotamer toggle switch on W286^6.48 on TM6. In agreement with trp-bimane quenching experiments, we found that norepinephrine and dopamine break the ionic lock and engage the rotamer toggle switch, whereas salbutamol, a noncatechol partial agonist only breaks the ionic lock, and the weak agonist catechol only engages the rotamer toggle switch. Norepinephrine and dopamine occupy the same binding region, between TM3, TM5, and TM6, whereas the binding site of salbutamol is shifted toward TM4. Catechol binds deeper into the protein cavity compared to the other ligands, making contact with TM5 and TM6. A part of the catechol binding site overlaps with those of dopamine and norepinephrine but not with that of salbutamol. Virtual ligand screening on 10,060 ligands on the norepinephrine-stabilized receptor conformation shows an enrichment of 38% compared to ligand unbound receptor conformation. These results show that ligand-induced conformational changes are important for developing functionally specific drugs that will stabilize a particular receptor conformation. These studies represent the first step toward a more universally applicable computational method for studying ligand efficacy and GPCR activation.     

Ligand-dependent perturbation of the conformational ensemble for the GPCR β2 adrenergic receptor revealed by HDX

Mechanism of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation and their modulation by functionally distinct ligands remains elusive. Using the technique of amide hydrogen/deuterium exchange coupled with mass spectrometry, we examined the ligand-induced changes in conformational states and stability within the beta-2-adrenergic receptor (β(2)AR). Differential HDX reveals ligand-specific alterations in the energy landscape of the receptor's conformational ensemble. The inverse agonists timolol and carazolol were found to be most stabilizing even compared with the antagonist alprenolol, notably in intracellular regions where G proteins are proposed to bind, while the agonist isoproterenol induced the largest degree of conformational mobility. The partial agonist clenbuterol displayed conformational effects found in both the inverse agonists and the agonist. This study highlights the?regional plasticity of the receptor and characterizes unique conformations spanning the entire receptor sequence stabilized by functionally selective ligands, all of which differ from the profile for the apo receptor.     

Role of lysine187 within the second extracellular loop of the type A cholecystokinin receptor in agonist-induced activation. Use of complementary charge-reversal mutagenesis to define a functionally important interdomain interaction

Activation of guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptors is believed to involve conformational change that exposes a domain for G protein coupling at the cytosolic surface of the helical confluence, although the mechanisms for achieving this are not well understood. This conformational change can be achieved by docking a diverse variety of agonist ligands, known to occur by interacting with different regions of these receptors. In this study, we focus on the importance of a specific basic residue (Lys187) within the second extracellular loop of the receptor for the peptide hormone, cholecystokinin. Alanine-replacement and charge-reversal mutagenesis of this residue showed that it had no effect on the binding of natural peptide and nonpeptidyl ligands of this receptor but markedly interfered with agonist-stimulated signaling. It was demonstrated that this negative effect on biological activity could be eliminated with the truncation of the first 30 residues of the amino-terminal tail of this receptor. Complementary charge-reversal mutagenesis of each of the five conserved acidic residues within this region of the receptor in the presence of the charge-reversed Lys187 revealed that only the Asp5 mutant fully reversed the negative functional impact of the Lys187 charge reversal. Thus, we have demonstrated that a basic residue within the second extracellular loop of the cholecystokinin receptor interacts with a specific acidic residue within the amino terminus of this receptor. This residue-residue interaction is nicely accommodated within a new molecular model of the agonist-occupied cholecystokinin receptor.     

An activation switch in the ligand binding pocket of the C5a receptor

Although agonists are thought to occupy binding pockets within the seven-helix core of serpentine receptors, the topography of these binding pockets and the conformational changes responsible for receptor activation are poorly understood. To identify the ligand binding pocket in the receptor for complement factor 5a (C5aR), we assessed binding affinities of hexapeptide ligands, each mutated at a single position, for seven mutant C5aRs, each mutated at a single position in the putative ligand binding site. In ChaW (an antagonist) and W5Cha (an agonist), the side chains at position 5 are tryptophan and cyclohexylalanine, respectively. Comparisons of binding affinities indicated that the hexapeptide residue at this position interacts with two C5aR residues, Ile-116 (helix III) and Val-286 (helix VII); in a C5aR model these two side chains point toward one another. Both the I116A and the V286A mutations markedly increased binding affinity of W5Cha but not that of ChaW. Moreover, ChaW, the antagonist hexapeptide, acted as a full agonist on the I116A mutant. These results argue that C5aR residues Ile-116 and Val-286 interact with the side chain at position 5 of the hexapeptide ligand to form an activation switch. Based on this and previous work, we present a docking model for the hexapeptide within the C5aR binding pocket. We propose that agonists induce a small change in the relative orientations of helices III and VII and that these helices work together to allow movement of helix VI away from the receptor core, thereby triggering G protein activation.     

Agonist-specific conformational changes in the yeast alpha-factor pheromone receptor.

The yeast alpha-factor pheromone receptor is a member of the G-protein-coupled receptor family. Limited trypsin digestion of yeast membranes was used to investigate ligand-induced conformational changes in this receptor. The agonist, alpha-factor, accelerated cleavage in the third intracellular loop, whereas the antagonist, desTrp1,Ala3-alpha-factor, reduced the cleavage rate. Thus, the enhanced accessibility of the third intracellular loop is specific to the agonist. alpha-Factor inhibited cleavage weakly at a second site near the cytoplasmic terminus of the seventh transmembrane helix, whereas the antagonist showed a stronger inhibition of cleavage at this site and at another site in the C-terminal domain of the receptor. The alpha-factor-induced conformational changes appeared to be inherent properties of the receptor, as they were retained in G-protein-deficient mutants. Moreover, a mutant receptor (ste2-L236H) that affects the third loop and is defective for G-protein coupling retained the ability to undergo the agonist-induced conformational changes. These results are consistent with a model in which G-protein activation is limited by the availability of specific contacts between the G protein and the third intracellular loop of the receptor. The antagonist appears to promote a distinct conformational state that differs from either the unoccupied or the agonist-occupied state.     

Molecular characterization of a purified 5-HT4 receptor: a structural basis for drug efficacy

Serotonin 5-HT(4(a)) receptor, a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), was produced as a functional isolated protein using Escherichia coli as an expression system. The isolated receptor was characterized at the molecular level by circular dichroism (CD) and steady-state fluorescence. A specific change in the near-UV CD band associated with the GPCR disulfide bond connecting the third transmembrane domain to the second extracellular loop (e2) was observed upon agonist binding to the purified receptor. This is a direct experimental evidence for a change in the conformation of the e2 loop upon receptor activation. Different variations were obtained depending whether the ligand was an agonist (partial or full) or an inverse agonist. In contrast, antagonist binding did not induce any variation. These observations provide a first direct evidence for the fact that free (or antagonist-occupied), active (partial- or full agonist-occupied) and silent (inverse agonist-occupied) states of the receptor involve different arrangements of the e2 loop. Finally, ligand-induced changes in the fluorescence emission profile of the purified receptor confirmed that the partial agonist stabilized a single, well-defined, conformational state and not a mixture of different states. This result is of particular interest in a pharmacological perspective since it directly demonstrates that the efficacy of a drug is likely due to the stabilization of a ligand-specific state rather than selection of a mixture of different conformational states of the receptor.     

Structures of Aplysia AChBP complexes with nicotinic agonists and antagonists reveal distinctive binding interfaces and conformations

Upon ligand binding at the subunit interfaces, the extracellular domain of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor undergoes conformational changes, and agonist binding allosterically triggers opening of the ion channel. The soluble acetylcholine-binding protein (AChBP) from snail has been shown to be a structural and functional surrogate of the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the receptor. Yet, individual AChBP species display disparate affinities for nicotinic ligands. The crystal structure of AChBP from Aplysia californica in the apo form reveals a more open loop C and distinctive positions for other surface loops, compared with previous structures. Analysis of Aplysia AChBP complexes with nicotinic ligands shows that loop C, which does not significantly change conformation upon binding of the antagonist, methyllycaconitine, further opens to accommodate the peptidic antagonist, alpha-conotoxin ImI, but wraps around the agonists lobeline and epibatidine. The structures also reveal extended and nonoverlapping interaction surfaces for the two antagonists, outside the binding loci for agonists. This comprehensive set of structures reflects a dynamic template for delineating further conformational changes of the LBD of the nicotinic receptor.     

Synthesis and receptor binding properties of chimeric peptides containing a mu-opioid receptor ligand and nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor ligand Ac-RYYRIK-amide

Four chimera peptides composed of ORL1 receptor ligand Ac-RYYRIK-NH2 and a mu-opioid receptor agonist dermorphin YAFGYPS-NH2 or YRFB-NH2, with a spacer linking the two pharmacophores, were synthesized and tested for their receptor binding properties. Chimera peptides with long spacers (a Lys and five or eight Gly residues) showed synergistically improved affinity for both the mu-opioid receptor and ORL1 receptor, while the chimera peptides with short spacers (Lys residue only) showed decreased or similar affinity compared to the monomeric receptor ligands. Chimera peptides containing long spacers may prove to be useful tools for studying ORL1 receptor/mu-opioid receptor heterodimers.     

Charged residues in the beta2 subunit involved in GABAA receptor activation

Fast synaptic inhibition in the mammalian central nervous system is mediated primarily via activation of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABAA-R). Upon agonist binding, the receptor undergoes a structural transition from the closed to the open state. This transition, known as gating, is thought to be associated with a sequence of conformational changes originating at the agonist-binding site, ultimately resulting in opening of the channel. Using site-directed mutagenesis and several different GABAA-R agonists, we identified a number of highly conserved charged residues in the GABAA-R beta2 subunit that appear to be involved in receptor activation. We then used charge reversal double mutants and disulfide trapping to investigate the interactions between these flexible loops within the beta2 subunit. The results suggest that interactions between an acidic residue in loop 7 (Asp146) and a basic residue in pre-transmembrane domain-1 (Lys215) are involved in coupling agonist binding to channel gating.     

Identification of residue-to-residue contact between a peptide ligand and its G protein-coupled receptor using periodate-mediated dihydroxyphenylalanine cross-linking and mass spectrometry

Fundamental knowledge about how G protein-coupled receptors and their ligands interact is important for understanding receptor-ligand binding and the development of new drug discovery strategies. We have used cross-linking and tandem mass spectrometry analyses to investigate the interaction of the N terminus of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae tridecapeptide pheromone, α-factor (WHWLQLKPGQPMY), and Ste2p, its cognate G protein-coupled receptor. The Trp(1) residue of α-factor was replaced by 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) for periodate-mediated chemical cross-linking, and biotin was conjugated to Lys(7) for detection purposes to create the peptide [DOPA(1),Lys(7)(BioACA),Nle(12)]α-factor, called Bio-DOPA(1)-α-factor. This ligand analog was a potent agonist and bound to Ste2p with ～65 nanomolar affinity. Immunoblot analysis of purified Ste2p samples that were treated with Bio-DOPA(1)-α-factor showed that the peptide analog cross-linked efficiently to Ste2p. The cross-linking was inhibited by the presence of either native α-factor or an α-factor antagonist. MALDI-TOF and immunoblot analyses revealed that Bio-DOPA(1)-α-factor cross-linked to a fragment of Ste2p encompassing residues Ser(251)-Met(294). Fragmentation of the cross-linked fragment and Ste2p using tandem mass spectrometry pinpointed the cross-link point of the DOPA(1) of the α-factor analog to the Ste2p Lys(269) side chain near the extracellular surface of the TM6-TM7 bundle. This conclusion was confirmed by a greatly diminished cross-linking of Bio-DOPA(1)-α-factor into a Ste2p(K269A) mutant. Based on these and previously obtained binding contact data, a mechanism of α-factor binding to Ste2p is proposed. The model for bound α-factor shows how ligand binding leads to conformational changes resulting in receptor activation of the signal transduction pathway.     

Plasmon-waveguide resonance spectroscopy: a new tool for investigating signal transduction by G-protein coupled receptors

Plasmon-waveguide resonance (PWR) spectroscopy provides a highly sensitive method for characterizing the kinetics, affinities and conformational changes involved in ligand binding to G-protein coupled receptors, without the need for radioactive or other labeling strategies. In the case of the cloned delta-opioid receptor from human brain incorporated into a lipid bilayer, we have shown that affinities determined in this way are consistent with those measured by standard binding procedures using membranes or whole cells containing the receptors, and that the spectral and kinetic properties of the binding processes allow facile distinction between agonist, inverse agonist, and antagonist ligands. We have also shown by direct measurements that G-protein binding affinities and the ability to undergo GTP/GDP exchange are dependent upon the type of ligand pre-bound to the receptor. PWR spectroscopy thus provides a powerful new approach to investigating signal transduction in biological membrane systems.     

Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer reveals ligand-induced conformational changes in CXCR4 homo- and heterodimers

Homo- and heterodimerization have emerged as prominent features of G-protein-coupled receptors with possible impact on the regulation of their activity. Using a sensitive bioluminescence resonance energy transfer system, we investigated the formation of CXCR4 and CCR2 chemokine receptor dimers. We found that both receptors exist as constitutive homo- and heterodimers and that ligands induce conformational changes within the pre-formed dimers without promoting receptor dimer formation or disassembly. Ligands with different intrinsic efficacies yielded distinct bioluminescence resonance energy transfer modulations, indicating the stabilization of distinct receptor conformations. We also found that peptides derived from the transmembrane domains of CXCR4 inhibited activation of this receptor by blocking the ligand-induced conformational transitions of the dimer. Taken together, our data support a model in which chemokine receptor homo- and heterodimers form spontaneously and respond to ligand binding as units that undergo conformational changes involving both protomers even when only one of the two ligand binding sites is occupied.     

A receptor-induced binding site in fibrinogen elicited by its interaction with platelet membrane glycoprotein IIb-IIIa.

The interaction of fibrinogen with membrane glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa regulates platelet aggregation. This ligand:integrin receptor interaction elicits conformational changes in GPIIb-IIIa as evidenced by the induction of ligand-induced binding sites which are recognized by antibodies that react selectively with the occupied receptor. The dynamic nature of these conformational changes is now demonstrated by the identification and characterization of a receptor-induced binding site (RIBS) elicited in fibrinogen bound to GPIIb-IIIa. A monoclonal antibody to fibrinogen, anti-Fg-RIBS-I, failed to bind to nonstimulated platelets in the presence or absence of fibrinogen. However, when platelets were stimulated with an agonist, the antibody reacted with platelet-bound fibrinogen even in the presence of a marked excess of unbound fibrinogen. A key element of the RIBS epitope has been precisely localized to residues 373-385 of the gamma chain of fibrinogen. Conformational elements also are important in defining the epitope. Fab fragments of the antibody inhibited platelet aggregation. As these fragments also inhibited fibrin polymerization, a commonality between these two diverse functions of fibrinogen in thrombus formation is indicated. In general, antibodies to RIBS and ligand-induced binding site provide unique probes for characterizing ligand:receptor interactions.     

The use of in vitro peptide binding profiles and in silico ligand-receptor interaction profiles to describe ligand-induced conformations of the retinoid X receptor alpha ligand-binding domain

It is hypothesized that different ligand-induced conformational changes can explain the different interactions of nuclear receptors with regulatory proteins, resulting in specific biological activities. Understanding the mechanism of how ligands regulate cofactor interaction facilitates drug design. To investigate these ligand-induced conformational changes at the surface of proteins, we performed a time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer assay with 52 different cofactor peptides measuring the ligand-induced cofactor recruitment to the retinoid X receptor-alpha (RXRalpha) in the presence of 11 compounds. Simultaneously we analyzed the binding modes of these compounds by molecular docking. An automated method converted the complex three-dimensional data of ligand-protein interactions into two-dimensional fingerprints, the so-called ligand-receptor interaction profiles. For a subset of compounds the conformational changes at the surface, as measured by peptide recruitment, correlate well with the calculated binding modes, suggesting that clustering of ligand-receptor interaction profiles is a very useful tool to discriminate compounds that may induce different conformations and possibly different effects in a cellular environment. In addition, we successfully combined ligand-receptor interaction profiles and peptide recruitment data to reveal structural elements that are possibly involved in the ligand-induced conformations. Interestingly, we could predict a possible binding mode of LG100754, a homodimer antagonist that showed no effect on peptide recruitment. Finally, the extensive analysis of the peptide recruitment profiles provided novel insight in the potential cellular effect of the compound; for the first time, we showed that in addition to the induction of coactivator peptide binding, all well-known RXRalpha agonists also induce binding of corepressor peptides to RXRalpha.     

Multiple interactions of the Asp(2.61(98)) side chain of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor contribute differentially to ligand interaction

Mutation of Asp(2.61(98)) at the extracellular boundary of transmembrane helix 2 of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor decreased the affinity for GnRH. Using site-directed mutagenesis, ligand modification, and computational modeling, different side chain interactions of Asp(2.61(98)) that contribute to high-affinity binding were investigated. The conservative Asp(2. 61(98))Glu mutation markedly decreased the affinity for a series of GnRH analogues containing the native His(2) residue. This mutant showed smaller decreases in affinity for His(2)-substituted ligands. The loss of preference for His(2)-containing ligands in the mutant receptor shows that Asp(2.61(98)) determines the specificity for His(2). Analysis of the affinities of a series of position 2-substituted ligands suggests that a hydrogen bond forms between Asp(2.61(98)) and the delta NH group of His(2) and that Asp(2. 61(98)) forms a second hydrogen bond with the ligand. Substitution of Asp(2.61(98)) with an uncharged residue further decreased the affinity for all ligands and also decreased receptor expression. Computational modeling indicates an intramolecular ionic interaction of Asp(2.61(98)) with Lys(3.32(121)) in transmembrane helix 3. The uncharged, Lys(3.32(121))Gln mutation also markedly decreased agonist affinity. The modeling and the similar phenotypes of mutants with uncharged substitutions for Asp(2.61(98)) or Lys(3.32(121)) are consistent with the presence of this helix 2-helix 3 interaction. These studies support a dual role for Asp(2.61(98)): formation of an interhelical interaction with Lys(3.32(121)) that contributes to the structure of the agonist binding pocket and an interaction with His(2) of GnRH that helps stabilize agonist complexing.