Flight Durations in Bumblebees Under Manipulation of Feeding Choices

Foraging bees spend less time flying between flowers of the same species than between individuals of different species. This time saving has been suggested as a possible advantage of flower-constant foraging. We hypothesized that the time required to switch flower type increases if (a) such switches are infrequent and (b) the bees need to decide whether to switch or not. Bumblebees were taught to forage on artificial feeders that were identical in morphology and reward schedule but differed in the color of their landing surface. In the first two experiments bees foraged alternatively between two feeders. In Experiment 1 the colors of the landing surfaces were switched every two or three visits, while in Experiment 2 they were switched every six or seven visits. In the third experiment, the bees were required to decide whether to make a color-constant or a color-shift flight. Intervisit time was defined as time elapsed between consecutive visits to feeders. When feeder colors were changed frequently (Experiment 1), we detected no difference between color-constant and color-shift intervisit times. When bees were repeatedly exposed to one color (Experiment 2), color shifts required a significantly longer time. When allowed to choose (Experiment 3), bees performed more color-constant flights than color-shift flights. Intervisit times were similar for color-constant and color-shift flights in this experiment. Intervisit times in Experiment 3 were significantly longer than in Experiment 2 and slightly but nonsignificantly longer than in Experiment 1. The results suggest that bees indeed save time though flower-constant foraging but that this time savings is a small (1 s/flower visit) under laboratory conditions, and appears only when switches between flower types are infrequent. The time saved may be more significant over long foraging trips, and when morphological differences between flower species are large, as often happens under natural conditions, providing a selective advantage to flower-constant foraging.     

The preferences of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) for different visual cues during the learning process

By working with very simple images, a number of different visual cues used by the honeybee have been described over the past decades. In most of the work, the bees had no control over the choice of the images, and it was not clear whether they learned the rewarded pattern or the difference between two images. Preferences were known to exist when untrained bees selected one pattern from a variety of them, but because the preferences of the bees were ignored, it was not possible to understand how natural images displaying several cues were detected. The preferences were also essential to make a computer model of the visual system. Therefore experiments were devised to show the order of preference for the known cues in the training situation. Freely flying bees were trained to discriminate between a rewarded target with one pattern on the left side and a different one on the right, versus a white or neutral target. This arrangement gave the bees a choice of what to learn. Tests showed that in some cases they learned two or three cues simultaneously; in other cases the bees learned one, or they preferred to avoid the unrewarded target. By testing with different combinations of patterns, it was possible to put the cues into an order of preference. Of the known cues, loosely or tightly attached to eye coordinates, a black or blue spot was the most preferred, followed by strong modulation caused by edges, the orientation of parallel bars, six equally spaced spokes, a clean white target, and then a square cross and a ring. A patch of blue colour was preferred to yellow.     

Spatial coincidence of cues in visual learning by the honeybee (Apis mellifera)

The discrimination of patterns was studied in a Y-choice chamber fitted with a transparent baffle in each arm, through which the bees had a choice of two targets via openings 5cm wide. The bees see the positive (rewarded) and the negative (unrewarded) targets from a fixed distance. The patterns were bars (subtending 22 degrees x5.4 degrees at the point of choice) presented in one-quarter of each target. The bars were moved to a different quarter of the target every 5min, to make the location of black useless as a cue. A coincident presentation is when the bar on the left target is on the same side of the target as the bar on the right target. The bees learn the orientation cue when the presentation is coincident but otherwise cannot learn it. This experiment shows that bees do not centre their attention on the individual bars, otherwise they would always discriminate the orientation. Centring the target as a whole precedes learning. Having learned with the bar on one side of the targets, bees do not recognize the same cue presented on the other side. A separate orientation cue can be learned on each side. A radial/tangential cue is preferred to a conflicting orientation cue.     

Discrimination of colors by the black-chinned hummingbird,Archilochus alexandri

Summary The color vision of a population of black-chinned hummingbirds was studied by behavioral methods. Birds were attracted to feeders equipped with tungsten lamps and interference filters. Results are based on counts of approximately 5700 visits by 92 ± 5 birds. Population size was estimated by mistnetting and marking 29 hummingbirds, 22 of which could be recognized individually during the course of the experiments.Following experience with red (620 nm) at all feeders, the birds showed a modest tendency to visit red (620 nm, 650 nm) and blue (490 nm) rather than intermediate greens and yellows. When sugar was presented at only one wavelength, however, choices became much sharper.When positions of the feeders were randomized, trained birds selected feeders on the basis of hue. Brightness was not used as a significant cue. This finding thus provides a more rigorous demonstration of color vision in hummingbirds than has heretofore been available.Either position or color could be learned in several hours (6–22 visits). Red (620 nm) and green (546 nm) were learned at the same rate. Two different (and opposing) color associations could be learned simultaneously at sites approximately 30 m apart.Discrimination of hue was measured following training to each of four wavelengths: 620, 590, 546, and 480 nm. Light from interference filters with transmission maxima at 546 and 550 nm were differentiated by the birds to a statistically significant extent. 546 and 590 nm appear to lie near the boundaries of hues; a boundary near 540 nm is found in pigeon but not human color vision.These experiments were supported by NIH grant EY00222. We are grateful to Nate Mandell for construction of the feeder-stimulators, to Vince Roth and the staff of the Southwestern Research Station for accommodating our special needs during the course of this work, and to the Bird Banding Laboratory of the Fish and Wildlife Service and the Arizona Fish and Game Department for granting the necessary permits to net and mark hummingbirds. We also thank Reed Pike of the Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University for unfailing help in preparing the illustrations.     

Pattern learning by honeybees: conditioning procedure and recognition strategy

In recognizing a pattern, honeybees Apis mellifera, may focus either on its ventral frontal part, or on the whole frontal image. We asked whether the conditioning procedure used to train the bees to a pattern determines the recognition strategy employed. Bees were trained with the same patterns presented vertically on the back walls of a Y maze. Conditioning was either absolute, that is, bees should learn to choose a rewarded pattern when there is no alternative, or differential, that is, bees should learn to choose a rewarded pattern that is paired with a different, nonrewarded one. Bees used different pattern recognition strategies depending on the conditioning procedure: absolute conditioning restricted recognition to the lower half whilst differential conditioning extended it to the whole pattern. Bees trained with absolute conditioning saw and learned the features of the upper part of the trained patterns, but assigned more weight to the lower part. Bees trained with differential conditioning learned not only the features of the reinforced stimulus in an excitatory way, but also those of the nonreinforced one in an inhibitory way. Thus, conditioning tasks that involve not only excitatory acquisition of the conditioned stimulus per se, but also discrimination of nonreinforced stimuli, result in an increase in the visual field assigned to the recognition task. Conditioning tasks that involve only excitatory acquisition of the rewarded stimulus result in a higher weighting of the lower pattern half and thus in a more reduced field assigned to the recognition task. This difference may reflect that existing between a conditioned and an incidental behavioural modification. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.     

Risk-indifferent foraging behaviour in honeybees

We studied the influence of variance in reward volume on choice behaviour of honeybees, Apis mellifera carnica, by training bees to collect sucrose solution from four newly developed artificial feeders. The feeders were electromechanical devices, each controlled by a microprocessor, which monitored the experiments, controlled reward delivery and stored the data. The parameters that varied between the feeders were the amount and variance of reward. The four feeders were arranged in two pairs, with the two feeders in each pair set to the same reward parameters. Constant feeders offered a fixed amount of sucrose solution at each bee visit; variable feeders offered a normally distributed reward with a standard deviation equal to the mean. We tested three reward combinations under two variance conditions. The bees matched their choice frequencies to the mean amount of reward. This applied both to the constant and the variable feeders. Thus the bees were able to discriminate feeders by the amount of reward and were able to estimate the mean reward for the variable flowers. The proportion of immediate returns to the same feeder increased with the amount of sucrose solution imbibed at each visit, indicating that bees were able to perceive the amount of reward at each visit. However, there was no influence of variance on the choice behaviour of the bees, ruling out the possibility that bees are risk sensitive under these conditions. We discuss risk indifference in choice behaviour of bees in the context of several models of risk sensitivity. Copyright 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.     

Bumblebees Do Not Respond to Variance in Nectar Concentration

Worker bumblebees (Bombus fervidus) were given repeated binary choices between two colors of artificial flowers with the same associated mean nectar concentration (X? = 20%), but with different variances in nectar concentration. Flowers of one color, yellow or blue, rewarded a bee with 1 μl of 20% sucrose solution (low-variance flower type) on each visit (p = 1) and flowers of the other color rewarded a bee on each visit with 1 μl of either 10% or 30% sucrose (p = 0.5; high-variance flower type). Of the 10 bees tested, nine showed no preference for either the high- or low-variance flowers (indifferent or risk-insensitive). This result is similar to honeybee responses to variation in nectar concentration, despite differences in foraging ecology between bumblebees and honeybees. Flower-choice behaviour in the presence of variance in nectar concentration is a response to the expected concentration of the alternative flower types. Possible mechanisms of risk-sensitive foraging behaviour in bees are discussed.     

Spatial orientation in Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica)

Finding a given location can be based on a variety of strategies, for example on the estimation of spatial relations between landmarks, called spatial orientation. In galliform birds, spatial orientation has been demonstrated convincingly in very young domestic chicks. We wanted to know whether adult Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica) without food deprivation are also able to use spatial orientation. The quails had to learn the relation of a food location with four conspicuous landmarks which were placed in the corners of a square shaped arena. They were trained to find mealworms in three adjacent food cups in a circle of 20 such cups. The rewarded feeders were located during training between the same two landmarks each of which showed a distinct pattern. When the birds had learned the task, all landmarks were displaced clockwise by 90 degrees. When tested in the new situation, all birds redirected their choices with respect to the landmark shift. In subsequent tests, however, the previously correct position was also chosen. According to our results, quails are using conspicuous landmarks as a first choice for orientation. The orientation towards the previously rewarded location, however, indicates that the neuronal representation of space which is used by the birds also includes more fine grain, less conspicuous cues, which are probably also taken into account in uncertain situations. We also presume that the rare orientation towards never rewarded feeders may be due to a foraging strategy instead of being mistakes.     

Visual wavelength discrimination by the loggerhead turtle, Caretta caretta

Marine turtles are visual animals, yet we know remarkably little about how they use this sensory capacity. In this study, our purpose was to determine whether loggerhead turtles could discriminate between objects on the basis of color. We used light-adapted hatchlings to determine the minimum intensity of blue (450 nm), green (500 nm), and yellow (580 nm) visual stimuli that evoked a positive phototaxis (the phototaxis "threshold" [pt]). Juvenile turtles were later trained to associate each color (presented at 1 log unit above that color's pt) with food, then to discriminate between two colors (the original rewarded stimulus plus one of the other colors, not rewarded) when both were presented at 1 log unit above their pt. In the crucial test, turtles were trained to choose between the rewarded and unrewarded color when the colors varied in intensity. All turtles learned that task, demonstrating color discrimination. An association between blue and food was acquired in fewer trials than between yellow and food, perhaps because some prey of juvenile loggerheads in oceanic surface waters (jellyfishes, polyps, and pelagic gastropods) are blue or violet in color.     

How Context Modification can Favor the Release of Past Experience in Vespula germanica Wasps,Enabling the Detection of a Novel Food Site

Vespula germanica wasps typically make consecutive trips between an undepleted food source and their nest. Hence, relocating a rewarded location is a recurrent activity during a wasp’s lifetime. While foraging, wasps continue searching over a previously rewarded location even when food is no longer available. Moreover, when food is displaced to a location nearby, wasps still visit the previously rewarded location. We aimed to study how the modification of the local context would affect the discovery of the novel food site. By displacing food and changing the local context after wasps had learned a certain task, we evaluated whether wasps found a new food location more rapidly than if contextual conditions remained unaltered. We found that when previously associated cues were modified, wasps were more likely to ‘give up’ searching at the old location than if these cues remained unaltered. Furthermore, we observed that a higher number of rewarding trials at the initial location resulted in greater time taken to detect the new feeder location.     

Discrimination of coloured patterns by honeybees through chromatic and achromatic cues

We investigated pattern discrimination by worker honeybees, Apis mellifera, focusing on the roles of spectral cues and the angular size of patterns. Free-flying bees were trained to discriminate concentric patterns in a Y-maze. The rewarded pattern could be composed of either a cyan and a yellow colour, which presented both different chromatic and achromatic L-receptor contrast, or an orange and a blue colour, which presented different chromatic cues, but the same L-receptor contrast. The non-rewarded alternative was either a single-coloured disc with the colour of the central disc or the surrounding ring of the pattern, a checkerboard pattern with non-resolvable squares, the reversed pattern, or the elements of the training pattern (disc or ring alone). Bees resolved and learned both colour elements in the rewarded patterns and their spatial properties. When the patterns subtended large visual angles, this discrimination used chromatic cues only. Patterns with yellow or orange central discs were generalised toward the yellow and orange colours, respectively. When the patterns subtended a visual angle close to the detection limit and L-receptor contrast was mediating discrimination, pattern perception was reduced: bees perceived only the pattern element with higher contrast.     

Bumble bee olfactory information flow and contact-based foraging activation

Nestmate foraging activation and interspecific variation in foraging activation is poorly understood in bumble bees, as compared to honey bees and stingless bees. We therefore investigated olfactory information flow and foraging activation in the New World bumble bee species, Bombus impatiens. We (1) tested the ability of foragers to associate forager-deposited odor marks with rewarding food, (2) determined whether potential foragers will seek out the food odor brought back by a successful forager, and (3) examined the role of intranidal tactile contacts in foraging activation. Bees learned to associate forager-deposited odor marks with rewarding food. They were significantly more attracted to an empty previously rewarding feeder presented at a random position within an array of eight previously non-rewarding feeders. However, foragers did not exhibit overall odor specificity for short-term, daily floral shifts. For two out of three tested scents, activated foragers did not significantly prefer the feeder providing the same scent as that brought back by a successful forager. Finally, bees contacted by the successful forager inside the nest were significantly more likely to leave the nest to forage (38.6% increase in attempts to feed from empty feeders) than were non-contacted bees. This is the first demonstration that tactile contact, a hypothesized evolutionary basal communication mechanism in the social corbiculate bees, is involved in bumble bee foraging activation. Received 4 September 2007; revised 30 May 2008; accepted 15 July 2008.     

Do foraging bumblebees scent-mark food sources and does it matter?

Summary The foraging of worker bees of Bombus terrestris visiting artificial feeders in a climatic test chamber was investigated. The behaviour of worker bees visiting rewarding and unrewarding feeders is completely different. Of all flower visits to rewarding feeders 94% are probing-visits, i.e. the bees land on the flower and probe for nectar. In contrast, only 0.3% of all visits to unrewarding feeders are probing-visits, whereas 47% are approach-visits, i.e., the bees approach the feeders without landing. Exchanging feeder discs proves that the signal used for discrimination must be associated with the plastic disc used as landing platform. Most probably it involves scent-marking of the rewarding feeders with components of high and low volatility. The mean foraging efficiency of bees in a scent-marked foraging arena is 5.7 mg sugar/min and drops to 2.8 mg sugar/min after the scent marked discs are replaced by clean ones. Three components generate this drop in foraging efficiency: (1) the between-flower flight time increases, i.e. the bees search for a longer time before landing on flowers, (2) the bees no longer discriminate between rewarding and unrewarding feeders, and (3) the bees probe empty feeders longer than necessary; obviously they expect to find nectar.     

Bumble Bees Show Asymmetrical Discrimination Between Two Odors in a Classical Conditioning Procedure

Olfactory processing of two odorants and their mixture was investigated in bumble bees Bombus terrestris using classical conditioning of the proboscis extension. In a standard procedure, workers were able to learn linalool, phenylacetaldehyde, and the mixture of these two components, with a similar level of response to these three stimuli. Thereafter, when we applied a differential conditioning procedure where one rewarded odorant was presented alternately against an unrewarded one, an asymmetrical discrimination between the two pure odors was found. Bumble bees performed well in the discriminative task when linalool was the rewarded stimulus and phenylacetaldehyde the unrewarded one, but they had difficulty learning phenylacetaldehyde if it was the rewarded odor in the symmetrical procedure. Indeed, unrewarded stimulations with linalool appeared to disrupt the learning of the alternative odor, possibly due to an innate biological meaning of linalool.     

Biological significance of distinguishing between similar colours in spectrally variable illumination: bumblebees (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Bombus terrestris</Emphasis>) as a case study

Individual bumblebees were trained to choose between rewarded target flowers and non-rewarded distractor flowers in a controlled illumination laboratory. Bees learnt to discriminate similar colours, but with smaller colour distances the frequency of errors increased. This indicates that pollen transfer might occur between flowers with similar colours, even if these colours are distinguishable. The effect of similar colours on reducing foraging accuracy of bees is evident for colour distances high above discrimination threshold, which explains previous field observations showing that bees do not exhibit complete flower constancy unless flower colour between species is distinct. Bees tested in spectrally different illumination conditions experienced a significant decrease in their ability to discriminate between similar colours. The extent to which this happens differs in different areas of colour space, which is consistent with a von Kries-type model of colour constancy. We find that it would be beneficial for plant species to have highly distinctive colour signals to overcome limitations on the bees performance in reliably judging differences between similar colours. An exception to this finding was flowers that varied in shape, in which case bees used this cue to compensate for inaccuracies of colour vision.     

Use of Flower Color-Cue Memory by Honey Bee Foragers Continues when Rewards No Longer Differ between Flower Colors

Honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) were used as a model insect system to explore forager use of a learned color-cue memory over several subsequent days. Experiments used artificial flower patches of blue and white flowers. Two experiments were performed, each beginning with a learning experience where 2 M sucrose was present in one flower color and 1 M sucrose in the alternative flower color. The first experiment followed flower color fidelity over a series of sequential days when rewards no longer differed between flowers of different color. The second examined the effect of intervening days without the forager visiting the flower patch. Results showed that color-cue memory decline was not a passive time-decay process and that information update in honey bees does not occur readily without new experiences of difference in rewarding flowers. Further, although the color cue learned was associated with nectar reward in long term memory, it did not seem to be specifically associated with the 2 M sucrose nectar reward when intervening nights occurred between learning and revisiting the flower patch.     

Bumblebees (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Bombus terrestris</Emphasis>) sacrifice foraging speed to solve difficult colour discrimination tasks

The performance of individual bumblebees at colour discrimination tasks was tested in a controlled laboratory environment. Bees were trained to discriminate between rewarded target colours and differently coloured distractors, and then tested in non-rewarded foraging bouts. For the discrimination of large colour distances bees made relatively fast decisions and selected target colours with a high degree of accuracy, but for the discrimination of smaller colour distances the accuracy decreased and the bees response times to find correct flowers significantly increased. For small colour distances there was also significant linear correlations between accuracy and response time for the individual bees. The results show both between task and within task speed-accuracy tradeoffs in bees, which suggests the possibility of a sophisticated and dynamic decision-making process.     

Hydroxyurea‐induced partial mushroom body ablation does not affect acquisition and retention of olfactory differential conditioning in honeybees

The mushroom bodies (MBs), a paired structure in the insect brain, play a major role in storing and retrieving olfactory memories. We tested whether olfactory learning and odor processing is impaired in honeybees in which MB subunits were partially ablated. Using hydroxyurea (HU) to selectively kill proliferating cells, we created honeybees with varying degrees of MB lesions. Three‐dimensional reconstructions of brains were generated to analyze the drug‐induced morphological changes. These reconstructions show that, with few exceptions, only the MBs were affected by the drug, while other brain areas remained morphometrically intact. Typically, lesions affected only the MB in one hemisphere of the brain. To preclude HU‐induced physiologic deficits in the antennal lobe (AL) affecting olfactory learning, we measured the responses to odors in the AL using an in vivo calcium imaging approach. The response patterns did not differ between the AL of intact versus ablated brain sides within respective specimens. We, therefore, carried out side‐specific classical discriminative olfactory conditioning of the proboscis extension reflex (PER) with control bees and with HU‐treated bees with or without MB ablations. All experimental groups learned equally to discriminate and respond to a rewarded (CS+) but not to an unrewarded (CS?) conditioned stimulus during acquisition and retention tests. Thus, our results indicate that partial MB lesions do not affect this form of elemental olfactory learning. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Neurobiol 53: 343–360, 2002     

Cue use affects resource subdivision among three coexisting hummingbird species

Competition for food can influence the coexistence of speciesvia habitat selection, and learned behavior can influence foragingdecisions. I investigated whether learned behavior and competitionact together to influence species interactions between threecoexisting hummingbird species: black-chinned (Archilochusalexandri), blue-throated (Lampornis clemenciae), and magnificent(Eugenes fulgens) hummingbirds. I found that color cue useby individuals affects not only their foraging choices butalso population-level responses to competition. I presented hummingbirds two types of habitats (rich and poor feeders).All birds shared a preference for the rich feeders, but shiftedpreference toward poor feeders in response to competition.I used color cues to manipulate the amount of information availableto birds and examined the effects of two information states(complete or incomplete) on their foraging choices. I examined hummingbirds' preferences for the rich feeders when both competitordensities and information varied. To relate foraging choicesto energetic intake, I also analyzed energy gained during asingle foraging bout. Males of all species exhibited strongpreferences for rich feeders when they foraged with complete information and low competitor densities. Without complete information,the two subordinate species (black-chinned and magnificent)shifted preference away from rich feeders in response to highdensities of the dominant species (blue-throated). Each subordinatespecies shifted in a unique way: black-chinned hummingbirdsreduced foraging efficiency, while magnificent hummingbirdsreduced foraging time. Birds foraging with complete information remained selective on rich feeders even at high competitor densities.Thus, learned information affected competitive interactions(for rich feeders) among these species.     

Multimodal signals enhance decision making in foraging bumble-bees

Multimodal signals are common in nature and have recently attracted considerable attention. Despite this interest, their function is not well understood. We test the hypothesis that multimodal signals improve decision making in receivers by influencing the speed and the accuracy of their decisions. We trained bumble-bees (Bombus impatiens) to discriminate between artificial flowers that differed either in one modality, visual (specifically, shape) or olfactory, or in two modalities, visual plus olfactory. Bees trained on multimodal flowers learned the rewarding flowers faster than those trained on flowers that differed only in the visual modality and, in extinction trials, visited the previously rewarded flowers at a higher rate than bees trained on unimodal flowers. Overall, bees showed a speed-accuracy trade-off; bees that made slower decisions achieved higher accuracy levels. Foraging on multimodal flowers did not affect the slope of the speed-accuracy relationship, but resulted in a higher intercept, indicating that multimodal signals were associated with consistently higher accuracy across range of decision speeds. Our results suggest that bees make more effective decisions when flowers signal in more than one modality, and confirm the importance of studying signal components together rather than separately.