The interaction of insulin-like growth factor-I with the N-terminal domain of IGFBP-5

Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) are key regulators of cell proliferation, differentiation and transformation, and are thus pivotal in cancer, especially breast, prostate and colon neoplasms. They are also important in many neurological and bone disorders. Their potent mitogenic and anti-apoptotic actions depend primarily on their availability to bind to the cell surface IGF-I receptor. In circulation and interstitial fluids, IGFs are largely unavailable as they are tightly associated with IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs) and are released after IGFBP proteolysis. Here we report the 2.1 A crystal structure of the complex of IGF-I bound to the N-terminal IGF-binding domain of IGFBP-5 (mini-IGFBP-5), a prototype interaction for all N-terminal domains of the IGFBP family. The principal interactions in the complex comprise interlaced hydrophobic side chains that protrude from both IGF-I and the IGFBP-5 fragment and a surrounding network of polar interactions. A solvent-exposed hydrophobic patch is located on the IGF-I pole opposite to the mini-IGFBP-5 binding region and marks the IGF-I receptor binding site.     

IGF-1, IGFBP-1, and IGFBP-3 polymorphisms predict circulating IGF levels but not breast cancer risk: findings from the Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium (BPC3)

IGF-1 has been shown to promote proliferation of normal epithelial breast cells, and the IGF pathway has also been linked to mammary carcinogenesis in animal models. We comprehensively examined the association between common genetic variation in the IGF1, IGFBP1, and IGFBP3 genes in relation to circulating IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels and breast cancer risk within the NCI Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium (BPC3). This analysis included 6,912 breast cancer cases and 8,891 matched controls (n = 6,410 for circulating IGF-I and 6,275 for circulating IGFBP-3 analyses) comprised primarily of Caucasian women drawn from six large cohorts. Linkage disequilibrium and haplotype patterns were characterized in the regions surrounding IGF1 and the genes coding for two of its binding proteins, IGFBP1 and IGFBP3. In total, thirty haplotype-tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (htSNP) were selected to provide high coverage of common haplotypes; the haplotype structure was defined across four haplotype blocks for IGF1 and three for IGFBP1 and IGFBP3. Specific IGF1 SNPs individually accounted for up to 5% change in circulating IGF-I levels and individual IGFBP3 SNPs were associated up to 12% change in circulating IGFBP-3 levels, but no associations were observed between these polymorphisms and breast cancer risk. Logistic regression analyses found no associations between breast cancer and any htSNPs or haplotypes in IGF1, IGFBP1, or IGFBP3. No effect modification was observed in analyses stratified by menopausal status, family history of breast cancer, body mass index, or postmenopausal hormone therapy, or for analyses stratified by stage at diagnosis or hormone receptor status. In summary, the impact of genetic variation in IGF1 and IGFBP3 on circulating IGF levels does not appear to substantially influence breast cancer risk substantially among primarily Caucasian postmenopausal women.     

Expression of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in human breast cancer correlates with estrogen receptor status

The insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) have been implicated in the growth regulation of human breast cancer. Since the IGFs are associated with specific binding proteins (IGFBPs) which may modulate receptor/ligand interactions, production of IGFBPs by breast cancer cells could alter their IGF-dependent growth. This study examined the expression of IGFBPs 4, 5, and 6 in eight breast cancer cell lines (BCCLs) using ribonuclease (RNase) protection assays. IGFBP-4 mRNA was detected in all BCCLs studied. IGFBP-5 expression was higher in estrogen receptor (ER) positive cells, while IGFBP-6 mRNA was detected in only two ER negative BCCLs. We also found that E₂ treatment enhanced the expression of IGFBPs 2, 4, and 5 in T47-D cells. We next studied IGFBP mRNA expression in 40 primary breast tumors. All tumors expressed mRNA for IGFBPs 2–6 but none expressed IGFBP-1 message. IGFBP-3 expression was higher in ER negative tumors, while that of IGFBP-4 and -5 was higher in ER positive specimens. These differences were statistically significant (P < .05). Ligand blot analysis of tumor extracts confirmed the presence of IGFBPs in breast cancer tissues. Thus, differential IGFBP expression in ER positive and negative tumors suggests an important role for this protein in breast cancer biology.     

Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding proteins: interactions with IGFs and intrinsic bioactivities

The insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding proteins (IGFBPs) are a family of six homologous proteins with high binding affinity for IGF-I and IGF-II. Information from NMR and mutagenesis studies is advancing knowledge of the key residues involved in these interactions. IGF binding may be modulated by IGFBP modifications, such as phosphorylation and proteolysis, and by cell or matrix association of the IGFBPs. All six IGFBPs have been shown to inhibit IGF action, but stimulatory effects have also been established for IGFBP-1, -3, and -5. These generally involve a decrease in IGFBP affinity and may require cell association of the IGFBP, but precise mechanisms are unknown. The same three IGFBPs have well established effects that are independent of type I IGF receptor signaling. IGFBP-1 exerts these effects by signaling through alpha(5)beta(1)-integrin, whereas IGFBP-3 and -5 may have specific cell-surface receptors with serine kinase activity. The regulation of cell sensitivity to inhibitory IGFBP signaling may play a role in the growth control of malignant cells.     

Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-5 gene expression is differentially regulated at a post-transcriptional level in retinoic acid-sensitive and resistant MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cells.

Insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP) gene expression and IGFBP secretion were investigated in a retinoic acid (RA)-resistant subline (RROI) of MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cells. Our results demonstrate that RRO-I cells constitutively secrete higher levels of IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-5. In addition, we found that a 5-fold increase in IGFBP-5 mRNA levels observed in RRO-I cells, which eventually leads to a similar increase in the secreted levels of IGFBP-5, was partly due to an increase in the stability of IGFBP-5 mRNA. Actinomycin D and cycloheximide differentially stabilized IGFBP-5 mRNA in MCF-7 cells but not in RRO-I cells, indicating a difference in the control of IGFBP-5 gene regulation at the level of mRNA stability in these cell lines.     

IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-5 associate with the cell binding domain (CBD) of fibronectin

We have used Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) - based biosensor technology to investigate the interaction of the six high affinity insulin-like growth factor binding proteins (IGFBP 1-6) with the cell binding domain (CBD) of fibronectin. Using a biotinylated derivative of the ninth and tenth TypeIII domains of FN (^9-10FNIII), we show that IGFBP-3 and -5 bind to FN-CBD. We show that this binding is inhibited by IGF-I and that, for IGFBP-5, binding occurs through the C-terminal heparin binding domain of the protein. Using site-directed mutagenesis of ^9-10FNIII, we show both the “synergy” and RGD sites within these FN domains are required for maximum binding of both IGFBPs. We discuss the possible biological consequences of our results.     

IGFBP-2的结构功能与调控及其与肿瘤关系的研究进展

IGFBP-2作为IGFBP超家族最受关注的分子之一,在多种肿瘤中都发现其表达增加,通过调控肿瘤细胞的增殖、转移、侵袭以及内皮募集和血管生成等多种过程,在肿瘤的发生与发展中起着重要作用。IGFBP-2的功能复杂多样,受细胞类型与细胞微环境的影响,其表达含量与肿瘤进程关系紧密,并且与抑癌基因PTEN的表达呈反相关。本文综述了IGFBP-2蛋白结构、功能、调控及其与肿瘤关系的研究进展,为将IGFBP-2作为新的肿瘤治疗靶点提供依据。     

Role for cyclic adenosine monophosphate in modulating insulin-like growth factor binding protein secretion by muscle cells

The modulation of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (IGFBP) secretion is an important variable affecting muscle cell metabolism, proliferation, and differentiation. We have previously shown that secretion of IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 by L6 and BC₃H-1 muscle cells was stimulated by treatment with either insulin, IGF-I, or IGF-II. Herein, these cells were used to further identify mechanisms involved in controlling IGFBP secretion. Agents that elevate intracellular cAMP concentrations (dcAMP, forskolin, isoproterenol, and prostaglandin [PGE₁]) increase secretion of IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 from L6 cells. Similar increases in IGFBP secretion were found by treatment with either insulin, IGF-I, or dcAMP. The effects of dcAMP and either insulin or IGF-I were additive, but the effects of insulin and IGF-I were not additive. These results suggest that insulin/IGF-I and dcAMP are acting via distinct mechanisms to stimulate IGFBP secretion. Indomethacin, which blocks endogenous prostaglandin synthesis, and progesterone, which decreases intracellular cAMP levels, decreased IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 secretion. IGFBP-5 secretion by BC₃H-1 cells was increased by either insulin or IGF-I. Agents which elevate intracellular cAMP concentrations did not increase IGFBP-5 secretion. Additionally, these agents were not synergistic with either insulin or IGF-I. However, indomethacin and progesterone depressed IGFBP-5 secretion by BC₃H-1 cells. In summary, there appear to be at least two intracellular signaling mechanisms controlling IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 secretion by L6 and BC₃H-1 muscle cells. IGFBP secretion by L6 cells is stimulated by both insulin/IGF-I and cAMP-dependent pathways, whereas IGFBP-5 secretion by BC₃H-1 cells is stimulated only by the insulin/IGF pathway. IGFBP secretion by both cell lines can be decreased by agents which depress cAMP levels. Our results suggest that two divergent but synergistic pathways modulate IGFBP production and these mechanisms can potentially modulate IGF activity during muscle cell proliferation and differentiation. J. Cell. Physiol. 174:293–300, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Short-term effects of anastrozole treatment on insulin-like growth factor system in postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients

Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) play a fundamental role in cancer development by acting in both an endocrinal and paracrinal manner, and hormone breast cancer treatments affect the IGF system by modifying circulating growth factor levels. We evaluated total IGF-1, IGF-2, IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-1 and IGFBP-3 in the blood of 34 postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients (median age 63 years, range 41–85) treated with anastrozole, a non-steroidal structure aromatase inhibitor (NSS-AI). The plasma samples were obtained at baseline, and after 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment. The IGFs were quantitated by means of sensitive radioimmunoassays (RIAs). IGF-1 significantly increased during anastrozole treatment (baseline versus 12 weeks, P=0.031), IGF-2 showed a trend towards an increase, and IGFBP-1 constantly but not significantly decreased; IGFBP-3 did not seem to be affected at all. The anastrozole-induced changes in IGFs and IGFBP-1 appeared to be different in the patients receiving a clinical benefit from those observed in non-responders. We have previously shown that letrozole (a different type of NSS-AI) modifies blood IGF-1 levels, and the results of this study of the biological effects of anastrozole on the components of the IGF system confirm our previous observations.     

IGF dependent modulation of IGF binding protein (IGFBP) proteolysis by pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A): Multiple PAPP-A–IGFBP interaction sites

Background

Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) is a local regulator of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) bioavailability in physiological systems, but many structural and functional aspects of the metzincin metalloproteinase remain to be elucidated. PAPP-A cleaves IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-4 and IGFBP-5. Cleavage of IGFBP-4, but not IGFBP-5, depends on the binding of IGF before proteolysis by PAPP-A can occur. The paralogue PAPP-A2 has two substrates among the six IGFBPs: IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-5.

Methods

Sets of chimeric proteins between IGFBP-4 and -5, and IGFBP-3 and -5 were constructed to investigate the structural requirements for IGF modulation. At the proteinase level, we investigated the importance of individual acidic amino acids positioned in the proteolytic domain of PAPP-A for proteolytic activity against IGFBP-4 and -5. Interaction between PAPP-A and its substrates was analyzed by surface plasmon resonance.

Results and conclusion

We provide data suggesting that the C-terminal domain of the IGFBPs is responsible for IGF-dependent modulation of access to the scissile bond. Loss or reduction of IGFBP proteolysis by PAPP-A was observed upon mutation of residues positioned in the unique 63-residue stretch separating the zinc and Met-turn motifs, and in the short sequence following the Met-turn methionine. A model of the proteolytic domain of PAPP-A suggests the presence of structural calcium ions in the C-terminal subdomain, implicated in IGFBP substrate interactions.

General significance

Detailed knowledge of interactions between PAPP-A and its substrates is required to understand the modulatory role of PAPP-A on IGF receptor stimulation.     

Role of insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-3 in TGF-beta- and GDF-8 (myostatin)-induced suppression of proliferation in porcine embryonic myogenic cell cultures

Both transforming growth factor (TGF-beta) and growth and development factor (GDF)-8 (myostatin) affect muscle differentiation by suppressing proliferation and differentiation of myogenic cells. In contrast, insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) stimulate both proliferation and differentiation of myogenic cells. In vivo, IGFs are found in association with a family of high-affinity insulin-like growth factor binding proteins (IGFBP 1-6) that affect their biological activity. Treatment of porcine embryonic myogenic cell (PEMC) cultures with either TGF-beta(1) or GDF-8 suppressed proliferation and increased production of IGFBP-3 protein and mRNA (P < 0.005). An anti-IGFBP-3 antibody that neutralizes the biological activity of IGFBP-3 reduced the ability of either TGF-beta(1) or GDF-8 to suppress PEMC proliferation (P < 0.005). However, this antibody did not affect proliferation rate in the presence of both TGF-beta(1) and GDF-8. These data show that IGFBP-3 plays a role in mediating the activity of either TGF-beta(1) or GDF-8 alone but not when both TGF-beta(1) and GDF-8 are present. In contrast to findings in T47D breast cancer cells, treatment of PEMC cultures with IGFBP-3 did not result in increased levels of phosphosmad-2. Since TGF-beta and GDF-8 are believed to play a significant role in regulating proliferation and differentiation of myogenic cells, our current data showing that IGFBP-3 plays a role in mediating the activity of these growth factors in muscle cell cultures strongly suggest that IGFBP-3 also may be involved in regulating these processes in myogenic cells.     

Nuclear import of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 and -5 is mediated by the importin beta subunit

Although insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (IGFBP)-3 and IGFBP-5 are known to modulate cell growth by reversibly sequestering extracellular insulin-like growth factors, several reports have suggested that IGFBP-3, and possibly also IGFBP-5, have important insulin-like growth factor-independent effects on cell growth. These effects may be related to the putative nuclear actions of IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-5, which we have recently shown are transported to the nuclei of T47D breast cancer cells. We now describe the mechanism for nuclear import of IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-5. In digitonin-permeabilized cells, where the nuclear envelope remained intact, nuclear translocation of wild-type IGFBP-3 appears to occur by a nuclear localization sequence (NLS)-dependent pathway mediated principally by the importin beta nuclear transport factor and requiring both ATP and GTP hydrolysis. Under identical conditions, an NLS mutant form of IGFBP-3, IGFBP-3[(228)KGRKR --> MDGEA], was unable to translocate to the nucleus. In cells where both the plasma membrane and nuclear envelope were permeabilized, wild-type IGFBP-3, but not the mutant form, accumulated in the nucleus, implying that the NLS was also involved in mediating binding to nuclear components. By fusing wild-type and mutant forms of NLS sequences (IGFBP-3 [215-232] and IGFBP-5 [201-218]) to the green fluorescent protein, we identified the critical residues of the NLS necessary and sufficient for nuclear accumulation. Using a Western ligand binding assay, wild-type IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-5, but not an NLS mutant form of IGFBP-3, were shown to be recognized by importin beta and the alpha/beta heterodimer but only poorly by importin alpha. Together these results suggest that the NLSs within the C-terminal domain of IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-5 are required for importin-beta-dependent nuclear uptake and probably also accumulation through mediating binding to nuclear components.     

Purification and characterization of native human insulin-like growth factor binding protein-6

Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins (IGFBPs) are key regulators of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) mediated signal transduction and thereby can profoundly influence cellular phenotypes and cell fate. Whereas IGFBPs are extracellular proteins, intracellular activities were described for several IGFBP family members, such as IGFBP-3, which can be reinternalized by endocytosis and reaches the nucleus through routes that remain to be fully established. Within the family of IGFBPs, IGFBP-6 is unique for its specific binding to IGF-II. IGFBP-6 was described to possess additional IGF-independent activities, which have in part been attributed to its translocation to the nucleus; however, cellular uptake of IGFBP-6 was not described. To further explore IGFBP-6 functions, we developed a new method for the purification of native human IGFBP-6 from cell culture supernatants, involving a four-step affinity purification procedure, which yields highly enriched IGFBP-6. Whereas protein purified in this way retained the capacity to interact with IGF-II and modulate IGF-dependent signal transduction, our data suggest that, unlike IGFBP-3, human IGFBP-6 is not readily internalized by human tumor cells. To summarize, this work describes a novel and efficient method for the purification of native human insulin-like growth factor binding protein 6 (IGFBP-6) from human cell culture supernatants, applying a four-step chromatography procedure. Intactness of purified IGFBP-6 was confirmed by IGF ligand Western blot and ability to modulate IGF-dependent signal transduction. Cellular uptake studies were performed to further characterize the purified protein, showing no short-term uptake of IGFBP-6, in contrast to IGFBP-3.     

IGFBP-1, an insulin like growth factor binding protein, is a cell growth inhibitor

A novel cell growth inhibitor, IDF45 (inhibitory diffusible factor), was recently purified to apparent homogeneity. It is a bifunctional molecule: able to bind Insulin like growth factor (IGF) and to 100% inhibit DNA synthesis stimulated by serum in fibroblasts. It was of interest to verify whether other members of the IGF-binding protein (IGFBP) family show the same bifunctional growth inhibitory properties. In this paper we show that purified IGFBP-1 derived from amniotic fluid is a cell growth inhibitor. In chick embryo fibroblasts, it inhibited DNA synthesis stimulated by serum. However the stimulation was maximally 60% inhibited and half of the inhibition was observed with 100ng/ml IGFBP-1. So the specific activity of IGFBP-1 is lower than that of IDF45. IGFBP-1 also reversibly prevented the CEF growth. In the same cells IGFBP-1 inhibited DNA synthesis stimulated by IGF-I. We demonstrated that the same protein IGFBP-1 is able to inhibit DNA synthesis stimulated by serum and by IGF-I. The possibility that IGFBP-1 is a bifunctional molecule is discussed.