Comparison of Cephalexin, Penicillin V, and Ampicillin in Streptococcal Infections in Monkeys

Intravenous inoculation of a group A hemolytic streptococcus caused lethal infections in all of 11 untreated monkeys. Daily intragastric administration of either 25 or 50 mg per kg per day, given in two equal morning and afternoon doses, yielded similar results in monkeys treated with cephalexin, penicillin V, and ampicillin; all eight monkeys in each therapy group survived. At dose levels of 12.5 mg per kg per day, six of eight, four of eight, and one of eight receiving cephalexin, penicillin V, and ampicillin, respectively, died. The differences observed at the lower dose level between cephalexin and ampicillin could be attributed, in part, to differences in the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of cephalexin (MIC = 0.24 mug/ml) and ampicillin (MIC = 0.01 mug/ml). The differences in results between penicillin V, which had the same MIC as ampicillin, could perhaps be attributed, in part, to shorter duration of antibacterial activity and higher protein binding of penicillin V. These studies support previous observations that cephalexin at 25 to 50 mg/kg doses is effective in severe streptococcal sepsis in monkeys.     

II. In vitro studies of antibacterial activity

One hundred and forty isolates of beta-hemolytic streptococcus cultured from patients with clinical pharyngitis were studied by disc diffusion for antibiotic sensitivity to lincomycin, erythromycin, cephalexin and penicillin and by agar dilution to cephalexin and penicillin. All isolates were sensitive to ≤ 0.1 μg./ml. penicillin and ≤ 1.56 μg./ml. cephalexin. The disc-diffusion test was reliable in predicting the sensitivities in vitro. One strain of group A betahemolytic streptococcus was resistant to erythromycin by disc diffusion. When compared to Lancefield grouping 18% of strains were incorrectly identified as group A by the bacitracin-disc test. Cephalexin was uniformly effective in vitro in inhibiting beta-hemolytic streptococci and the 30 μg. cephalexin disc was reliable in predicting these sensitivities.     

Treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis with amoxycillin once a day.

OBJECTIVE--To evaluate treatment of group A beta haemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis with amoxycillin once daily compared with phenoxymethylpenicillin three or four times a day. DESIGN--Randomised controlled study of consecutive patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of group A beta haemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis in whom culture of a throat swab yielded positive results. SETTING--Five family medicine practices. SUBJECTS--157 patients aged over 3 years who required treatment with antibiotics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Clinical response, bacteriological response, days at work and school lost, and compliance. RESULTS--During the period of the study 393 patients presented with symptoms suggesting streptococcal pharyngitis; 157 of them had throat swabs that yielded positive results on culture. Eighty two were treated with phenoxymethylpenicillin and 75 with amoxycillin. No difference was observed in the clinical response, days at work and school lost (139 days for 64 patients taking phenoxymethylpenicillin v 100 days for 57 patients taking amoxycillin; p > 0.2), or residual positive cultures after two days (6 (7.3%) v 3 (4%); p > 0.5). A significant difference in the bacteriological response was found after 14 days (5 (6.1%) v 0; p < 0.04) with no positive cultures observed in the amoxycillin group. CONCLUSIONS--These findings support the hypothesis that amoxycillin once daily is as effective as phenoxymethylpenicillin in the treatment of group A beta haemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis.     

Prospective study on streptococcal pharyngitis among a town population

A one-year-round study on pharyngitis incidence among the general population of a town (24,300 inhabitants) was carried out. All patients, with pharyngitis who visited health centres were examined clinically and mcirobiologically. The overall pharyngitis incidence rate and the streptococcal pharyngitis incidence rate were, respectively, 8.3 and 3.9 cases per 100 population. Age-related incidence was highest in the group of 5-10 years, seasonal incidence was highest in autumn. Clinical diagnoses made preliminary to bacteriological examination were correct in only a half of the streptococcal pharyngitis cases. The accuracy of clinical diagnosis of streptococcal pharyngitis could, at best, be raised to 80% if fever of less than or equal to 38.0 degrees C and presence of exudate on tonsils should be considered significant criteria. A great majority of the streptococcal pharyngitis cases were caused by group A streptococci; the prevailing M types were 12, 1 and 3. Emphasis is laid on the necessity of performing microbiological examination of all pharyngitis cases in order to ensure etiological diagnosis and causal therapy. 15)     

Antibiotics and the Oral Streptococci of Man

The effects of 3 antibiotics, phenoxymethylpenicillin, cephalexin and clindamycin on the normal oral streptococcal flora in the region of the gingival crevice were investigated because these organisms are able to cause subacute bacterial endocarditis. Secretion of these antibiotics into the oral cavity was also examined. Penicillin and clindamycin exerted marked effects on the normal oral streptococci, whereas cephalexin did not cause any obvious change in the total flora. Following penicillin therapy, streptococci resistant to 1.5 μg/ml penicillin were observed and these organisms could be detected at least 8 weeks after the last dose of the antibiotic. They probably arose by selection from the mixed flora. Following cephalexin therapy, a much lower proportion of streptococci resistant to 15 μg/ml was found. The proportion of resistant strains fluctuated appreciably, however, probably due to their transient nature. Streptococci resistant to 1 μg/ml clindamycin were not observed in 10 out of 11 treated subjects.
Penicillin and clindamycin could be detected in the pooled saliva and gingival fluid after administering single doses of 500 mg and 300 mg, respectively. The peak levels were obtained between half and 1 h. The concentration of penicillin dropped rapidly within 3 h but clindamycin could be detected at significant levels for at least 6 h. No cephalexin could be detected in the pooled saliva or gingival fluid after a 500 mg dose. The implications of these findings in the prevention of subacute bacterial endocarditis are discussed.     

A real-world exploratory study on the feasibility of vonoprazan and tetracycline dual therapy for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in special populations with penicillin allergy or failed in previous amoxicillin-containing therapies

Background

The treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is a challenge for those who cannot use amoxicillin.

Objective

To evaluate the eradication rate and adverse effects of vonoprazan and tetracycline dual therapy as first-line and rescue treatment regimens used in special populations with penicillin allergy or failed in previous amoxicillin-containing therapies.

Design

Patients enrolled were those who were H. pylori-positive with selected conditions: (1) allergic to penicillin, either naïve to treatment or had failed before; or (2) failed in previous amoxicillin-containing therapies. All enrolled patients accepted 14-day vonoprazan and tetracycline dual therapy (VT dual therapy) as follows: vonoprazan (20 mg b.i.d.) and tetracycline (500 mg t.i.d. [body weight < 70 kg] or 500 mg q.i.d. [body weight ≥ 70 kg]). H. pylori status was evaluated by ¹³C-urease breath test 6 weeks after treatment. All adverse effects were recorded. Some patients underwent bacterial culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing.

Results

A total of 62 patients were enrolled; 18 of them received VT dual therapy as first-line treatment, 44 patients received VT dual therapy as rescue treatment. Overall, 58 of 62 patients achieved successful eradication (93.5%), while all involved (100%,18/18) succeeded in the first-line treatment group and 40 cases (90.9%, 40/44) succeeded in the rescue treatment group. Sixty-one (61/62, 98.4%) patients completed the whole course of treatment. Adverse events occurred in 6 patients (6/62, 9.7%), while one patient quit because of skin rash. All adverse effects were mild and relieved spontaneously after H. pylori treatment. Five patients achieved successful H. pylori culture, and all strains isolated were sensitive to tetracycline.

Conclusions

For the treatment of H. pylori infection in special populations with penicillin allergy or failed in previous amoxicillin-containing therapies, a 14-day vonoprazan and tetracycline dual therapy was effective and safe as first-line and rescue treatment in our study. Further study is warranted to verify its efficacy, especially for those who cannot use amoxicillin.     

Single-dose treatment of gonococcal urethritis in males: evaluation of procaine penicillin,ampicillin and spectinomycin

Males with acute gonococcal urethritis were treated at random with 2.4 million units aqueous procaine penicillin G intramuscularly plus 1.0 g. probenecid orally, 3.5 g. ampicillin orally plus 1.0 g. probenecid orally, or 2.0 g. spectinomycin intramuscularly. The overall follow-up was 97%. All treatments were of equal efficacy, eradication of gonococcal disease being observed in 93 to 97% of treated patients. Treatment failures occurred in each drug group and pre-treatment isolates recovered from these cases showed decreased susceptibility to the agent used. Aqueous procaine penicillin G plus probenecid remains the preferred therapy for gonorrhea. For patients hypersensitive to penicillin, spectinomycin is currently a reasonable alternative drug. This agent, unlike procaine penicillin-probenecid, is probably ineffective against concurrent incubating syphilis, and future development of bacterial resistance is a definite possibility.     

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori for the prevention of peptic ulcer rebleeding

AIM: To evaluate the effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on ulcer bleeding recurrence in a prospective, long-term study including more than 400 patients. METHODS: Patients with peptic ulcer bleeding were prospectively included. H. pylori infection was confirmed by rapid urease test, histology or (13)C-urea breath test. Several eradication regimens were used. Ranitidine 150 mg was administered daily until eradication was confirmed by breath test 8 weeks after completing eradication therapy. Patients with therapy failure received a second or third course of therapy. Patients with eradication success did not receive maintenance anti-ulcer therapy, and were controlled yearly with a repeated breath test. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-two patients were followed up for at least 12 months, with a total of 906 patient-years of follow up. Mean age was 59 years, and 35% were previous nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) users. Sixty-nine percent had duodenal, 24% gastric, and 7% pyloric ulcer. Recurrence of bleeding was demonstrated in two patients at 1 year (incidence: 0.22% per patient-year of follow up), which occurred after NSAID use in both cases. CONCLUSION: Peptic ulcer rebleeding does not occur in patients with complicated ulcers after H. pylori eradication. Maintenance anti-ulcer (antisecretory) therapy is not necessary if eradication is achieved.     

One year follow-up of patients after successful helicobacter pylori eradication therapy

The aim of this study was to investigate the Helicobacter pylori (Hp) status of patients who underwent successful eradication therapy 1 year prior to the study and to evaluate their current symptoms. Methods: all of the patients were initially evaluated by oesophago-gastro-bulboscopy and the Hp status was determined by at least two different methods [rapid urease test, histology or urea breath test (UBT)]. The Hp infection was treated with a 1-week triple therapy protocol, and the UBT was repeated 4–6 weeks later. We invited back 110 patients who had negative post-eradication UBT results 12±3 months prior to the study period. UBT was repeated and a questionnaire was completed about the previous and present complaints and medication. Results: 80 of the 110 patients (73%) came back for the follow-up. Twenty five patients had peptic ulcer disease, 36 patients had gastritis or duodenitis without erosive lesions, and 19 patients had erosive form of gastritis or duodenitis initially. All of the patients except one in the erosive gastritis group had negative control UBT 1 year after the eradication, which means 1.25% recurrence rate within 1 year. The eradication therapy completely revealed the symptoms of 16 patients in the ulcer group (64%), 13 patients in the gastroduodenitis group (36%, P=0.03 vs. ulcer patients), 10 patients with erosive gastroduodenitis (52%), but this was only temporary. One year after the eradication therapy seven of the ulcer patients (28%), 11 patients with gastroduodenitis (31%) and seven patients with erosive gastroduodenitis (37%) were symptom-free. Most of the patients had epigastric pain (44%), heartburn (43%) and/or abdominal distension (33%). Nine ulcer patients (36%), 10 patients with gastroduodenitis (28%) and five patients with erosive gastroduodenitis (26%) were taking H₂-blockers regularly. Conclusion: the 1-month post-eradication UBT was probable true negative in all of the evaluated cases, since 79 patients (98.75%) were also negative after 1 year. The Hp recurrence rate is very low (1.25%) in a 1-year period. The symptoms were relieved shortly after eradication therapy in the majority of patients with ulcer disease or erosive lesions. However, significantly smaller portion of the patients with gastroduodenitis became symptom-free. Only about one third of the treated patients remained symptom-free 1 year after the eradication.     

Comparative Double-blind Trial of Cephalexin and Ampicillin in Treatment of Urinary Infections

Cephalexin was compared with ampicillin in the treatment of urinary tract infections by a random double-blind technique. Both drugs were found to be equally effective. In 21 out of 31 patients treated with cephalexin and in 20 out of 31 treated with ampicillin the urine was sterile three weeks after starting therapy. The bacteriological findings at one and eight weeks were also similar in both groups. No serious adverse reactions were attributable to cephalexin, which seemed to be tolerated rather better than ampicillin.     

One year follow-up of patients after successful helicobacter pylori eradication therapy.

The aim of this study was to investigate the Helicobacter pylori (Hp) status of patients who underwent successful eradication therapy 1 year prior to the study and to evaluate their current symptoms. METHODS: all of the patients were initially evaluated by oesophago-gastro-bulboscopy and the Hp status was determined by at least two different methods [rapid urease test, histology or urea breath test (UBT)]. The Hp infection was treated with a 1-week triple therapy protocol, and the UBT was repeated 4-6 weeks later. We invited back 110 patients who had negative post-eradication UBT results 12+/-3 months prior to the study period. UBT was repeated and a questionnaire was completed about the previous and present complaints and medication. RESULTS: 80 of the 110 patients (73%) came back for the follow-up. Twenty five patients had peptic ulcer disease, 36 patients had gastritis or duodenitis without erosive lesions, and 19 patients had erosive form of gastritis or duodenitis initially. All of the patients except one in the erosive gastritis group had negative control UBT 1 year after the eradication, which means 1.25% recurrence rate within 1 year. The eradication therapy completely revealed the symptoms of 16 patients in the ulcer group (64%), 13 patients in the gastroduodenitis group (36%, P=0.03 vs. ulcer patients), 10 patients with erosive gastroduodenitis (52%), but this was only temporary. One year after the eradication therapy seven of the ulcer patients (28%), 11 patients with gastroduodenitis (31%) and seven patients with erosive gastroduodenitis (37%) were symptom-free. Most of the patients had epigastric pain (44%), heartburn (43%) and/or abdominal distension (33%). Nine ulcer patients (36%), 10 patients with gastroduodenitis (28%) and five patients with erosive gastroduodenitis (26%) were taking H(2)-blockers regularly. CONCLUSION: the 1-month post-eradication UBT was probable true negative in all of the evaluated cases, since 79 patients (98.75%) were also negative after 1 year. The Hp recurrence rate is very low (1.25%) in a 1-year period. The symptoms were relieved shortly after eradication therapy in the majority of patients with ulcer disease or erosive lesions. However, significantly smaller portion of the patients with gastroduodenitis became symptom-free. Only about one third of the treated patients remained symptom-free 1 year after the eradication.     

Cephalexin and Cephaloglycin Activity In Vitro and Absorption and Urinary Excretion of Single Oral Doses in Normal Young Adults

A large number of recently isolated bacterial pathogens were tested for susceptibility to cephalexin and cephaloglycin by the replica inoculating method. Strains of group A hemolytic streptococci, viridans (alpha and gamma) streptococci, pneumococci, gonococci, meningococci, and penicillin G-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus were all moderately to highly susceptible to both of these cephalosporin analogues, nearly all of the strains being two to eight (median four) times more susceptible to cephaloglycin than to cephalexin. The penicillin G-resistant, penicillinase-producing strains of S. aureus varied in their susceptibility; many were moderately resistant to both analogues, particularly to cephalexin. Strains of enterococci, Haemophilus influenzae, and most of the common gram-negative bacilli were moderately to highly resistant. Reducing the size of the inoculum had variable effects on inhibition by these drugs, depending on the species or strain. The activity of cephalexin was very little affected by pH of the medium within the clinical range or by incubation at 37 C in broth for up to 24 hr. In contrast, cephaloglycin in broth deteriorated rapidly at 37 C, and its activity was markedly reduced in alkaline medium. Both cephalexin and cephaloglycin were rapidly absorbed and excreted into the urine after single oral doses of 500 mg. Much higher levels were achieved and sustained with the former. Absorption of both analogues was delayed when taken with food, and the levels in the serum were significantly higher and better sustained when probenecid was also given. Very high concentrations of cephalexin were excreted into the urine during the first 4 hr, and the levels were still high in the 4- to 8-hr collection. The concentrations of cephaloglycin in the urine at these times were much lower. An average of 80 to 93% of the dose of cephalexin and 25 to 30% of the cephaloglycin were accounted for as active drug in the urine collected in 8 hr. Both analogues were well tolerated.     

Intravenous Therapy Duration and Outcomes in Melioidosis: A New Treatment Paradigm

BackgroundInternational melioidosis treatment guidelines recommend a minimum 10 to 14 days’ intravenous antibiotic therapy (intensive phase), followed by 3 to 6 months’ oral therapy (eradication phase). This approach is associated with rates of relapse, defined as recurrence following the eradication phase, that can exceed 5%. Rates of recrudescence, defined as recurrence during the eradication phase, have not previously been reported. In response to low eradication phase completion rates in Australia, a local guideline has evolved over the last ten years recommending a longer minimum intensive phase duration for many cases of melioidosis.

Methodology/ Principal Findings

This retrospective cohort study reviews antibiotic duration for the first episode of care for all patients diagnosed with melioidosis and surviving the intensive phase during a recent three year period in the tropical north of Australia’s Northern Territory; we also review adherence to the current local guideline and treatment outcomes. Of 215 first episodes of melioidosis surviving the intensive phase, the median (interquartile range) intensive phase duration was 26 (14-34) days. One hundred and eight (50.2%) patients completed eradication therapy; 58 (27.0%) patients took no eradication therapy. At 28 months’ follow-up, one (0.5%) relapse and eleven (5.1%) recrudescences had occurred. On exact logistic regression analysis, the only independent risk factors for recrudescence were self-discharge during the intensive phase (odds ratio 6.2 [95% confidence interval 1.2-30.0]) and septic shock (odds ratio 5.3 [95% confidence interval 1.1-25.7]).

Conclusions/ Significance

Relapsed melioidosis is rare in patients who receive a minimum intensive phase duration specified by our guideline and extended according to clinical progress. Recrudescence rates may improve with reductions in rates of self-discharge. Given the low relapse rate despite a high rate of eradication therapy non-adherence, the duration and necessity of eradication therapy for different patients after guideline-concordant intensive therapy should be evaluated further.     

复方嗜酸乳杆菌片联合三联方案根除幽门螺杆菌的临床研究

目的探讨复方嗜酸乳杆菌片联合三联方案根除幽门螺杆菌(Helicobacter pylori,H.pylori)的疗效及不良反应。方法将143例H.pylori检测阳性的患者随机分为A1组(48例)、A2组(46例)和B组(49例)。B组给予三联方案(埃索美拉唑、阿莫西林、克拉霉素)根除H.pylori治疗,疗程10d。A1组、A2组分别在上述三联方案的基础上同时加用10d、20d的复方嗜酸乳杆菌片。治疗过程中观察并记录上述三组的不良反应发生情况,停药4周后查13 C呼气试验判别H.pylori根除是否成功。结果共133例患者完成治疗和随访,A1组、A2组、B组根除率按方案(PP)分析分别为65.9%、69.8%、63.0%,按意向性(ITT)分析分别为60.4%、65.2%、59.2%,无论按方案分析还是意向性分析三组根除率差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。纳入三组的共143例患者均完成不良反应的随访,A1组、A2组、B组不良反应发生率分别为10.4%、8.7%、30.6%,三组相比差异有统计学意义(P0.05),其中A1组、A2组分别与B组相比差异有统计学意义(P0.05),A1组与A2组相比差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论三联方案加用10d、20d的复方嗜酸乳杆菌片未能提高H.pylori根除率,但可降低不良反应发生率。     

Helicobacter pylori infection and immune thrombocytopenic purpura: an update

Data are accumulating on the association between Helicobacter pylori infection and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and the significant increase in platelet count after bacterial eradication. The aim of this review was to consider the studies so far published on H. pylori infection and ITP in order to evaluate a possible correlation between these two conditions. A review of the literature showed that 278 out of the 482 ITP patients investigated (58%) were positive for H. pylori infection and that the bacterium was eradicated in 88% of cases. Eradication therapy was accompanied by a complete or partial platelet response in approximately half the cases. Overall, these data show that H. pylori eradication in patients with ITP is effective in increasing platelet count. However, because the studies so far published are few, are sometimes controversial and involve small series of patients, further studies on larger numbers of patients with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.     

Quadruple therapy with medications containing either rufloxacin or furazolidone as a rescue regimen in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-infected dyspepsia patients: a randomized pilot study

Background: The eradication rates of first‐line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection are not satisfactory. Various regimens including quadruple therapies have been recommended as rescue therapies after the first H. pylori eradication attempt failed. Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety between quadruple therapies with medications containing either rufloxacin or levofloxacin in the Chinese nonulcer dyspepsia patients infected with H. pylori. Methods: One hundred and thirty‐eight patients after an unsuccessful 10‐day standard triple therapy were enrolled in this study. They were randomized to receive a 14‐day quadruple therapy with pantoprazole, bismuth citrate, and furazolidone in combination with either rufloxacin (Group Ruf, n = 70) or levofloxacin (Group Lev, n = 68). The H. pylori eradication was evaluated by ¹³C‐urea breath test 4 and 12 weeks after therapy was completed. Results: One hundred and twenty‐seven patients (65 in Group Ruf and 62 in Group Lev) completed the study. The H. pylori eradication rates in Group Ruf were 81.4% for intention‐to‐treat (ITT) analysis and 87.7% for per‐protocol (PP) analysis. The rates were statistically significantly higher than those in Group Lev (66.2% and 72.6%) (p < 0.05). There were no severe adverse effects found in these two groups. Conclusions: Fourteen‐day quadruple therapy with a combination of proton‐pump inhibitor, bismuth citrate, furazolidone, and rufloxacin is considered an effective and safe rescue therapy for H. pylori eradication after failure of standard triple treatment.     

The dynamics of detecting group-A streptococci in an infectious disease clinic]

The study revealed that the isolation rate of group A streptococci in scarlet fever patients at the time of hospitalization did not exceed 68%. The isolation rate of these streptococci was greatly influenced by antibacterial therapy carried out before hospitalization. Under clinical conditions with intensive penicillin therapy group A streptococci were eliminated from the larynx on days 3-4. In 13% of children repeated streptococcal infection was observed 0.5-3 months after discharge from hospital.     

Impact of ELISA and immunoblot as diagnostic tools one year after eradication of Helicobacter pylori in a multicentre treatment study

The performance of serological tests for Helicobacter pylori infections is hampered by the persistence of antibodies after eradication therapy or spontaneous healing. Detection of different antigens or immunoglobulin classes might have an impact on the validity of serodiagnosis. The aim of this study was to assess the decrease in IgA and IgG antibody levels after eradication of H. pylori. Serum samples of 242 patients with active duodenal ulcer were tested with the ELISA and the immunoblot (IB) techniques for H. pylori-specific IgA and IgG antibodies before therapy and 1 year after successful eradication. From a total of 81 patients paired sera were available. At the end of the follow-up period ELISA antibody titres from the IgA class had decreased from a mean value of 6.69 to 4.26 units (P = 0.0001), and IgG class antibody titres from a mean value of 21.9 to 12.1 units (P = 0.0001). Regarding seroreversion, from 34 initially IgA positive sera 16 (47%), and from 74 IgG positive sera 18 (24%), had definitively reverted to 'negative'. One year after eradication, when tested with the immunoblot, the antibody responses against specific antigens of 37% IgA-positive sera (23/62) and 8% IgG-positive sera (6/78) reverted to 'negative', compared to a seroreversion rate of 27% of the anti-CagA IgA-positive sera (18/67) and of 9% of the anti-CagA IgG-positive sera (7/79). In conclusion, despite an overall significant decrease of H. pylori antibodies, both tests cannot be recommended for monitoring treatment success.     

Randomized trial on 14 versus 7 days of esomeprazole, moxifloxacin, and amoxicillin for second-line or rescue treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

Background: Triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, moxifloxacin, and amoxicillin has been proven effective in first‐line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Aim: To explore 1, the value of triple therapy with esomeprazole, moxifloxacin, and amoxicillin in second‐line or rescue treatment of Caucasian patients and 2, the impact of treatment duration on eradication success. Methods: H. pylori‐infected patients with at least one previous treatment failure were randomized to oral esomeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., moxifloxacin 400 mg o.d., and amoxicillin 1000 mg b.i.d. for either 7 (EMA‐7) or 14 days (EMA‐14). Eradication was confirmed by 13C urea breath test. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed in all patients at baseline and in patients who failed treatment. Results: Eighty patients were randomized, and 60% had ≥2 previous treatment failures. Pretreatment resistance against clarithromycin and metronidazole was found in 70.5 and 61.5% of cases, respectively. The intention‐to‐treat eradication rate was significantly higher after EMA‐14 compared with EMA‐7 (95.0 vs 78.9%, p = .036). No independent risk factor for treatment failure could be identified. There were no serious adverse events. Five of the EMA‐14 patients (12.5%) compared with none of the EMA‐7 patients discontinued prematurely because of adverse events (p = .031). Post‐treatment resistance against moxifloxacin was found in one of seven patients with isolated organisms (14.3%). Conclusion: Second‐line/rescue H. pylori eradication therapy with esomeprazole, moxifloxacin, and amoxicillin is very effective and well tolerated. Fourteen days of treatment significantly increase the eradication rate but also the rate of adverse events.     

黄连素四联方案补救治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的有效性和安全性

目的:探索黄连素四联方案用于幽门螺杆菌感染根除失败患者补救治疗的有效性及安全性。方法:将经四联方案初次根除治疗失败并自愿接受补救治疗的130例患者按纳入顺序,以1:1的比例分配治疗,随机接受14天黄连素四联(埃索美拉唑20mg+胶体果胶铋200 mg+阿莫西林1000 mg,2/d+黄连素300 mg 3/d)或四环素四联(埃索美拉唑20 mg+胶体果胶铋200 mg+四环素750 mg+呋喃唑酮100 mg,2/d)方案的治疗。所有患者均于治疗14天及治疗结束至少28天后随诊,详细记录患者症状及不良反应情况。治疗结束至少28天后进行13C尿素呼气试验来判断幽门螺杆菌根除情况。结果:65例接受黄连素四联根除治疗,65例接受四环素四联方案治疗。两组分别有6例和4例患者因不良反应服药依从性小于80%,其余患者均完成了14天的治疗。黄连素组和四环素组的幽门螺杆菌根除率ITT分析分别为76.9%(50/65)和81.5%(53/65),P=0.520;PP分析分别为84.7%(50/59)和86.9%(53/61),P=0.739。黄连素组和四环素组不良事件总体发生率分别为49.2%和41.5%,P=0.370。结论:黄连素四联疗法用于幽门螺杆菌感染的二次根除治疗,根除率较高,未明显增加不良事件发生率,是有效及安全的补救治疗方案。