Ribosomal RNA genes of Trypanosoma brucei: mapping the regions specifying the six small ribosomal RNAs

There are six small ribosomal RNAs in trypanosome ribosomes. sRNA3 and sRNA5 of Trypanosoma brucei brucei have been partially sequenced. Sequence homologies indicate that sRNA3 is 5.8S RNA and sRNA5 is 5S RNA of T. b. brucei. The regions specifying these two, and the remaining four small RNAs, have been identified within clones of rRNA genes and in the genome. Five of the small RNAs, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6, hybridise exclusively within the major rRNA gene repeat. A map of the regions specifying these small RNAs is presented. sRNA3 (5.8S RNA) hybridises to a region corresponding to the transcribed spacer of other eukaryotes. sRNA1 hybridises to a region between sequences specifying the two large subunit RNA molecules of 2.3 kb and 1.8 kb. Sequences specifying sRNAs 2 and 4 are present near the sequence specifying sRNA1, while sRNA6 appears to be specified 3' to the sequence specifying the 1.8-kb RNA sequence. In addition regions of secondary hybridisation for small RNAs 2, 3, 4 and 6 have also been identified. Though sRNA5 (5S RNA) hybridises within the major rRNA repeat, a separate 5S RNA gene repeat with unit size of 760 bp is also present. It is 10 to 20 times more abundant than the major rRNA gene repeat.     

Identification of bacterial small non-coding RNAs: experimental approaches

Almost 140 bacterial small RNAs (sRNAs; sometimes referred to as non-coding RNAs) have been discovered in the past six years. The majority of these sRNAs were discovered in Escherichia coli, and a smaller subset was characterized in other bacteria, many of which were pathogenic. Many of these genes were identified as a result of systematic screens using computational prediction of sRNAs and experimental-based approaches, including microarray and shotgun cloning. A smaller number of sRNAs were discovered by direct labeling or by functional genetic screens. Many of the discovered genes, ranging in size from 50 to 500 nucleotides, are conserved and located in intergenic regions, in-between open reading frames. The expression of many of these genes is growth phase dependent or stress related. As each search employed specific parameters, this led to the identification of genes with distinct characteristics. Consequently, unique sRNAs such as those that are species-specific, sRNA genes that are transcribed under unique conditions or genes located on the antisense strand of protein-encoding genes, were probably missed.     

Cycling of the Sm-like protein Hfq on the DsrA small regulatory RNA

Small RNAs (sRNAs) regulate bacterial genes involved in environmental adaptation. This RNA regulation requires Hfq, a bacterial Sm-like protein that stabilizes sRNAs and enhances RNA-RNA interactions. To understand the mechanism of target recognition by sRNAs, we investigated the interactions between Hfq, the sRNA DsrA, and its regulatory target rpoS mRNA, which encodes the stress response sigma factor. Nuclease footprinting revealed that Hfq recognized multiple sites in rpoS mRNA without significantly perturbing secondary structure in the 5' leader that inhibits translation initiation. Base-pairing with DsrA, however, made the rpoS ribosome binding site fully accessible, as predicted by genetic data. Hfq bound DsrA four times more tightly than the DsrA.rpoS RNA complex in gel mobility-shift assays. Consequently, Hfq is displaced rapidly from its high-affinity binding site on DsrA by conformational changes in DsrA, when DsrA base-pairs with rpoS mRNA. Hfq accelerated DsrA.rpoS RNA association and stabilized the RNA complex up to twofold. Hybridization of DsrA and rpoS mRNA was optimal when Hfq occupied its primary binding site on free DsrA, but was inhibited when Hfq associated with the DsrA.rpoS RNA complex. We conclude that recognition of rpoS mRNA is stimulated by binding of Hfq to free DsrA sRNA, followed by release of Hfq from the sRNA.mRNA complex.     

Small RNAs: Efficient and miraculous effectors that play key roles in plant–microbe interactions

Plants' response to pathogens is highly complex and involves changes at different levels, such as activation or repression of a vast array of genes. Recently, many studies have demonstrated that many RNAs, especially small RNAs (sRNAs), are involved in genetic expression and reprogramming affecting plant–pathogen interactions. The sRNAs, including short interfering RNAs and microRNAs, are noncoding RNA with 18–30 nucleotides, and are recognized as key genetic and epigenetic regulators. In this review, we summarize the new findings about defence-related sRNAs in the response to pathogens and our current understanding of their effects on plant–pathogen interactions. The main content of this review article includes the roles of sRNAs in plant–pathogen interactions, cross-kingdom sRNA trafficking between host and pathogen, and the application of RNA-based fungicides for plant disease control.     

Competition among Hfq-binding small RNAs in Escherichia coli

A major class of small bacterial RNAs (sRNAs) regulate translation and mRNA stability by pairing with target mRNAs, dependent upon the RNA chaperone Hfq. Hfq, related to the Lsm/Sm families of splicing proteins, binds the sRNAs and stabilizes them in vivo and stimulates pairing with mRNAs in vitro. Although Hfq is abundant, the sRNAs, when induced, are similarly abundant. Therefore, Hfq may be limiting for sRNA function. We find that, when overexpressed, a number of sRNAs competed with endogenous sRNAs for binding to Hfq. This correlated with lower accumulation of the sRNAs (presumably a reflection of the loss of Hfq binding), and lower activity of the sRNAs in regulating gene expression. Hfq was limiting for both positive and negative regulation by the sRNAs. In addition, deletion of the gene for an expressed and particularly effective competitor sRNA improved the regulation of genes by other sRNAs, suggesting that Hfq is limiting during normal growth conditions. These results support the existence of a hierarchy of sRNA competition for Hfq, modulating the function of some sRNAs.     

Requirement of upstream Hfq-binding (ARN)x elements in glmS and the Hfq C-terminal region for GlmS upregulation by sRNAs GlmZ and GlmY{dagger}

Hfq is an important RNA-binding protein that helps bacteria adapt to stress. Its primary function is to promote pairing between trans-acting small non-coding RNAs (sRNAs) and their target mRNAs. Identification of essential Hfq-binding motifs in up-stream regions of rpoS and fhlA led us to ask the question whether these elements are a common occurrence among other Hfq-dependent mRNAs as well. Here, we confirm the presence of a similar (ARN)(x) motif in glmS RNA, a gene controlled by two sRNAs (GlmZ and GlmY) in an Hfq-dependent manner. GlmZ represents a canonical sRNA:mRNA pairing system, whereas GlmY is non-canonical, interfacing with the RNA processing protein YhbJ. We show that glmS interacts with both Hfq-binding surfaces in the absence of sRNAs. Even though two (ARN)(x) motifs are present, using a glmS:gfp fusion system, we determined that only one specific (ARN)(x) element is essential for regulation. Furthermore, we show that residues 66-72 in the C-terminal extension of Escherichia coli Hfq are essential for activation of GlmS expression by GlmY, but not with GlmZ. This result shows that the C-terminal extension of Hfq may be required for some forms of non-canonical sRNA regulation involving ancillary components such as additional RNAs or proteins.