Δ122p53, a mouse model of Δ133p53α, enhances the tumor-suppressor activities of an attenuated p53 mutant

Growing evidence suggests the Δ133p53α isoform may function as an oncogene. It is overexpressed in many tumors, stimulates pathways involved in tumor progression, and inhibits some activities of wild-type p53, including transactivation and apoptosis. We hypothesized that Δ133p53α would have an even more profound effect on p53 variants with weaker tumor-suppressor capability. We tested this using a mouse model heterozygous for a Δ133p53α-like isoform (Δ122p53) and a p53 mutant with weak tumor-suppressor function (mΔpro). The Δ122p53/mΔpro mice showed a unique survival curve with a wide range of survival times (92–495 days) which was much greater than mΔpro/- mice (range 120–250 days) and mice heterozygous for the Δ122p53 and p53 null alleles (Δ122p53/-, range 78–150 days), suggesting Δ122p53 increased the tumor-suppressor activity of mΔpro. Moreover, some of the mice that survived longest only developed benign tumors. In vitro analyses to investigate why some Δ122p53/mΔpro mice were protected from aggressive tumors revealed that Δ122p53 stabilized mΔpro and prolonged the response to DNA damage. Similar effects of Δ122p53 and Δ133p53α were observed on wild-type of full-length p53, but these did not result in improved biological responses. The data suggest that Δ122p53 (and Δ133p53α) could offer some protection against tumors by enhancing the p53 response to stress.The p53 tumor suppressor is most important for preventing cancers. p53 controls cell fate in response to stress by inducing apoptosis, cell cycle arrest/senescence, DNA repair (reviewed in Braithwaite et al.,^{1, 2} Oren,³ and Speidel⁴) or possibly restricting supply of basic substrates for metabolism.^{5, 6, 7} The regulation of p53 function has recently become more complex with the discovery of 13 isoforms, which may interfere with the normal functioning of full-length (FL) p53.^{8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14} An alternative promoter in intron 4 generates the Δ133p53 isoforms (Δ133p53α, and with additional alternative splicing in intron 9, Δ133p53β, and Δ133p53γ¹¹).The Δ133p53α isoform is expressed in many tissues, but elevated levels have been found in several cancers.^{11, 15, 16} Although the function(s) of Δ133p53α are not fully understood, growing evidence suggests it may have tumor-promoting capacities. Reducing Δ133p53α levels in the U87MG glioblastoma cell line reduced its ability to migrate and stimulate angiogenesis.¹⁷ Δ133p53α may also interfere with the tumor-suppressor functions of FLp53. The zebrafish ortholog of Δ133p53α, Δ113p53, inhibited p53-mediated apoptosis,¹⁸ and overexpression of Δ133p53α inhibited p53-directed G₁ cell cycle arrest.¹⁶Previously, we reported the construction and characterization of a mouse expressing an N-terminal truncation mutant of p53 (designated Δ122p53) that is very similar to Δ133p53α, providing the first mouse model of the Δ133p53α isoform.^{19, 20} Δ122p53 was found to increase cell proliferation and in p53 null cells transduced with a Δ122p53 expressing retrovirus, inhibited the transactivation of CDKN1a (encoding) p21^CIP1 and MDM2 by FLp53.^{19, 20} As well as elevating cell proliferation, homozygote Δ122p53 mice exhibited a profound pro-inflammatory phenotype, including increased serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and γ-interferon (γ-IFN), and features of autoimmune disease.^{19, 20} The mice were tumor-prone displaying a complex tumor spectrum, but predominantly B-cell lymphomas and osteosarcomas. Thus, most evidence supports a role for the Δ133p53α isoform as a dominant oncogene that may interfere with normal FLp53 tumor-suppressor functions, but also has additional ''gain-of-function'' properties to promote tumor progression, probably through inflammatory mechanisms.²¹Given the above data, we reasoned that in an environment where p53 tumor-suppression capacity is compromised, such as in the context of the R72P allele^{22, 23, 24} or where p53 levels are reduced,^{25, 26, 27} the influence of Δ133p53α isoform on FLp53 function would be greater, leading to rapid tumor formation with a phenotype that would resemble that of the isoform alone. To test this, we generated mice heterozygous for Δ122p53 and a p53 mutant (mΔpro) that we previously described, that has attenuated tumor-suppressor activity.^{28, 29} The mΔpro mouse model is missing part of the p53 proline rich domain (PRD, amino acids 58–88). These mice are defective for DNA damage-induced apoptosis, and show a delayed and impaired cell cycle arrest response. Homozygous mΔpro mice develop late onset follicular B-cell tumors, while mΔpro heterozygotes developed few tumors in the presence of a wild-type p53 allele, or an early onset T-cell lymphoma in a p53-null background. In the latter case, the onset and tumor spectrum are indistinguishable from p53-null mice.²⁸In the current study, we found that, in contrast to our hypothesis, many Δ122p53/mΔpro mice showed extended survival compared with Δ122p53 homozygotes. In vitro analyses to explain this phenomenon suggested that Δ122p53 allele can enhance mΔpro tumor-suppressor functions, in particular cell cycle arrest.     

Depletion of white adipocyte progenitors induces beige adipocyte differentiation and suppresses obesity development

Overgrowth of white adipose tissue (WAT) in obesity occurs as a result of adipocyte hypertrophy and hyperplasia. Expansion and renewal of adipocytes relies on proliferation and differentiation of white adipocyte progenitors (WAP); however, the requirement of WAP for obesity development has not been proven. Here, we investigate whether depletion of WAP can be used to prevent WAT expansion. We test this approach by using a hunter-killer peptide designed to induce apoptosis selectively in WAP. We show that targeted WAP cytoablation results in a long-term WAT growth suppression despite increased caloric intake in a mouse diet-induced obesity model. Our data indicate that WAP depletion results in a compensatory population of adipose tissue with beige adipocytes. Consistent with reported thermogenic capacity of beige adipose tissue, WAP-depleted mice display increased energy expenditure. We conclude that targeting of white adipocyte progenitors could be developed as a strategy to sustained modulation of WAT metabolic activity.Obesity, a medical condition predisposing to diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and complicating other life-threatening diseases, is becoming an increasingly important social problem.^{1, 2, 3} Development of pharmacological approaches to reduction of body fat has remained a daunting task.⁴ Approved obesity treatments typically produce only moderate and temporary effects.^2,5 White adipocytes are the differentiated cells of white adipose tissue (WAT) that store triglycerides in lipid droplets.^6,7 In contrast, adipocytes of brown adipose tissue (BAT) dissipate excess energy through adaptive thermogenesis. Under certain conditions, white adipocytes can become partially replaced with brown-like ‘beige'' (‘brite'') adipocytes that simulate the thermogenic function of BAT adipocytes.^7,8 Obesity develops in the context of positive energy balance as a result of hypertrophy and hyperplasia of white adipocytes.⁹Expansion and renewal of the white adipocyte pool in WAT continues in adulthood.^10,11 This process is believed to rely on proliferation and self-renewal of mesenchymal precursor cells¹² that we term white adipocyte progenitors (WAPs). WAPs reside within the population of adipose stromal cells (ASCs)¹³ and are functionally similar to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs).^{14, 15, 16} ASCs can be isolated from the stromal/vascular fraction (SVF) of WAT based on negativity for hematopoietic (CD45) and endothelial (CD31) markers.^17,18 ASCs support vascularization as mural/adventitial cells secreting angiogenic factors^5,19 and, unlike bone marrow MSCs, express CD34.^19,20 WAPs have been identified within the ASC population based on expression of mesenchymal markers, such as platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β (PDGFRβ, aka CD140b) and pericyte markers.^17,18 Recently, a distinct ASC progenitor population capable of differentiating into both white and brown adipocytes has been identified in WAT based on PDGFRα (CD140a) expression and lack of PDGFRβ expression.^21,22 The physiological relevance of the two precursor populations residing in WAT has not been explored.We have previously established an approach to isolate peptide ligands binding to receptors selectively expressed on the surface of cell populations of interest.^{23, 24, 25, 26, 27} Such cell-targeted peptides can be used for targeted delivery of experimental therapeutic agents in vivo. A number of ‘hunter-killer'' peptides²⁸ composed of a cell-homing domain binding to a surface marker and of KLAKLAK₂ (sequence KLAKLAKKLAKLAK), a moiety inducing apoptosis upon receptor-mediated internalization, has been described by our group.^26,29 Such bimodal peptides have been used for depletion of malignant cells and organ-specific endothelial cells in preclinical animal models.^26,30,31 Recently, we isolated a cyclic peptide WAT7 (amino acid sequence CSWKYWFGEC) based on its specific binding to ASCs.²⁰ We identified Δ-decorin (ΔDCN), a proteolytic cleavage fragment of decorin, as the WAT7 receptor specifically expressed on the surface of CD34+PDGFRβ+CD31-CD45- WAPs and absent on MSCs in other organs.²⁰Here, we investigated whether WAPs are required for obesity development in adulthood. By designing a new hunter-killer peptide that directs KLAKLAK₂ to WAPs through WAT7/ΔDCN interaction, we depleted WAP in the mouse diet-induced obesity model. We demonstrate that WAP depletion suppresses WAT growth. We show that, in response to WAP deficiency, WAT becomes populated with beige adipocytes. Consistent with the reported thermogenic function of beige adipocytes,^32,33 the observed WAT remodeling is associated with increased energy expenditure. We identify a population of PDGFRα-positive, PDGFRβ-negative ASCs reported recently²² as a population surviving WAP depletion and responsible for WAT browning.     

TRAF2 is a biologically important necroptosis suppressor

Tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) triggers necroptotic cell death through an intracellular signaling complex containing receptor-interacting protein kinase (RIPK) 1 and RIPK3, called the necrosome. RIPK1 phosphorylates RIPK3, which phosphorylates the pseudokinase mixed lineage kinase-domain-like (MLKL)—driving its oligomerization and membrane-disrupting necroptotic activity. Here, we show that TNF receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2)—previously implicated in apoptosis suppression—also inhibits necroptotic signaling by TNFα. TRAF2 disruption in mouse fibroblasts augmented TNFα–driven necrosome formation and RIPK3-MLKL association, promoting necroptosis. TRAF2 constitutively associated with MLKL, whereas TNFα reversed this via cylindromatosis-dependent TRAF2 deubiquitination. Ectopic interaction of TRAF2 and MLKL required the C-terminal portion but not the N-terminal, RING, or CIM region of TRAF2. Induced TRAF2 knockout (KO) in adult mice caused rapid lethality, in conjunction with increased hepatic necrosome assembly. By contrast, TRAF2 KO on a RIPK3 KO background caused delayed mortality, in concert with elevated intestinal caspase-8 protein and activity. Combined injection of TNFR1-Fc, Fas-Fc and DR5-Fc decoys prevented death upon TRAF2 KO. However, Fas-Fc and DR5-Fc were ineffective, whereas TNFR1-Fc and interferon α receptor (IFNAR1)-Fc were partially protective against lethality upon combined TRAF2 and RIPK3 KO. These results identify TRAF2 as an important biological suppressor of necroptosis in vitro and in vivo.Apoptotic cell death is mediated by caspases and has distinct morphological features, including membrane blebbing, cell shrinkage and nuclear fragmentation.^{1, 2, 3, 4} In contrast, necroptotic cell death is caspase-independent and is characterized by loss of membrane integrity, cell swelling and implosion.^{1, 2, 5} Nevertheless, necroptosis is a highly regulated process, requiring activation of RIPK1 and RIPK3, which form the core necrosome complex.^{1, 2, 5} Necrosome assembly can be induced via specific death receptors or toll-like receptors, among other modules.^{6, 7, 8, 9} The activated necrosome engages MLKL by RIPK3-mediated phosphorylation.^{6, 10, 11} MLKL then oligomerizes and binds to membrane phospholipids, forming pores that cause necroptotic cell death.^{10, 12, 13, 14, 15} Unchecked necroptosis disrupts embryonic development in mice and contributes to several human diseases.^{7, 8, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22}The apoptotic mediators FADD, caspase-8 and cFLIP suppress necroptosis.^{19, 20, 21, 23, 24} Elimination of any of these genes in mice causes embryonic lethality, subverted by additional deletion of RIPK3 or MLKL.^{19, 20, 21, 25} Necroptosis is also regulated at the level of RIPK1. Whereas TNFα engagement of TNFR1 leads to K63-linked ubiquitination of RIPK1 by cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (cIAPs) to promote nuclear factor (NF)-κB activation,²⁶ necroptosis requires suppression or reversal of this modification to allow RIPK1 autophosphorylation and consequent RIPK3 activation.^{2, 23, 27, 28} CYLD promotes necroptotic signaling by deubiquitinating RIPK1, augmenting its interaction with RIPK3.²⁹ Conversely, caspase-8-mediated CYLD cleavage inhibits necroptosis.²⁴TRAF2 recruits cIAPs to the TNFα-TNFR1 signaling complex, facilitating NF-κB activation.^{30, 31, 32, 33} TRAF2 also supports K48-linked ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of death-receptor-activated caspase-8, curbing apoptosis.³⁴ TRAF2 KO mice display embryonic lethality; some survive through birth but have severe developmental and immune deficiencies and die prematurely.^{35, 36} Conditional TRAF2 KO leads to rapid intestinal inflammation and mortality.³⁷ Furthermore, hepatic TRAF2 depletion augments apoptosis activation via Fas/CD95.³⁴ TRAF2 attenuates necroptosis induction in vitro by the death ligands Apo2L/TRAIL and Fas/CD95L.³⁸ However, it remains unclear whether TRAF2 regulates TNFα-induced necroptosis—and if so—how. Our present findings reveal that TRAF2 inhibits TNFα necroptotic signaling. Furthermore, our results establish TRAF2 as a biologically important necroptosis suppressor in vitro and in vivo and provide initial insight into the mechanisms underlying this function.     

Ret is essential to mediate GDNF's neuroprotective and neuroregenerative effect in a Parkinson disease mouse model

Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is a potent survival and regeneration-promoting factor for dopaminergic neurons in cell and animal models of Parkinson disease (PD). GDNF is currently tested in clinical trials on PD patients with so far inconclusive results. The receptor tyrosine kinase Ret is the canonical GDNF receptor, but several alternative GDNF receptors have been proposed, raising the question of which signaling receptor mediates here the beneficial GDNF effects. To address this question we overexpressed GDNF in the striatum of mice deficient for Ret in dopaminergic neurons and subsequently challenged these mice with 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP). Strikingly, in this established PD mouse model, the absence of Ret completely abolished GDNF''s neuroprotective and regenerative effect on the midbrain dopaminergic system. This establishes Ret signaling as absolutely required for GDNF''s effects to prevent and compensate dopaminergic system degeneration and suggests Ret activation as the primary target of GDNF therapy in PD.Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is the founding member of the four ligands in the GDNF family, which belong to the transforming growth factor-β superfamily.¹ GDNF was characterized as a potent survival factor for many neurons in culture such as dopaminergic, motor, sympathetic, parasympathetic, sensory and enteric neurons.^{1, 2} In addition, in dopaminergic neuron cultures GDNF stimulates neuronal differentiation, neurite outgrowth, synapse formation and dopamine release.^{1, 2}As degeneration of midbrain dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) represents a major hallmark of Parkinson disease (PD), the most common neurodegenerative movement disorder, GDNF has raised considerable interest as a therapeutic molecule for the treatment of PD.^{3, 4, 5} PD affects >2% of individuals over the age of 60 years, but no curative treatment is available to date, mainly due to a lack of understanding disease etiology.^{6, 7, 8} Preclinical studies in the established 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) and 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) rodent and primate models of PD demonstrated a substantial neuroprotection and regeneration effect by striatal provided GDNF or its close relative neurturin.^{3, 4, 9} However, clinical phase II trials on PD patients using GDNF or neurturin did so far not convincingly recapitulate their beneficial effects on the dopaminergic system in humans most likely due to technical problems and the selection of advanced PD patients.^{10, 11, 12, 13}GDNF signaling is highly complex as this neurotrophic factor can bind to a variety of receptors, thus being able to induce pleiotropic effects. GDNF efficiently binds to the GPI-linked GDNF family receptor α1 (GFRα1).^{1, 2} It has been shown that the GDNF/GFRα1 complex can activate not only the canonical GDNF receptor Ret, a receptor tyrosine kinase which signals through the sarcoma protein (Src)/rat sarcoma (Ras)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt, NF-κB (nuclear factor ''kappa-light-chain-enhancer'' of activated B cells), JNK (c-Jun N-terminal kinases) and PLCγ (phospholipase γ) pathway, but also with other signaling inducing receptors.^{1, 2, 4, 5, 13} So far, at least four alternative GDNF receptors have been described which are all expressed in midbrain dopaminergic neurons, NCAM,^{14, 15} the integrins αV and βI,^{14, 16} syndecan 3¹⁷ and N-cadherin.¹⁸ Interestingly, Ret is not essential during pre- and postnatal development of the mouse dopaminergic system,^{19, 20, 21, 22, 23} but specifically required for the maintenance of SNpc dopaminergic neurons and their striatal innervation in aged mice.^{23, 24, 25} In contrast, GDNF seems most likely under physiological conditions to be dispensable during development and maintenance of midbrain dopaminergic neurons in mice, although conflicting results exist.^{26, 27, 28} Thus, Ret might be activated by a GDNF-independent mechanism to stimulate SNpc dopaminergic neuron survival. In addition, the in vivo function of the alternative GDNF receptors in the dopaminergic system under physiological and pathophysiological conditions, like PD, and their dependence on GDNF has not yet been addressed in detail. This raised the important question which GDNF receptor might be required to mediate GDNF''s reported neuroprotective and regenerative effect in the dopaminergic system in PD animal models and potentially in PD patients.^{5, 29}Previously, we showed in dopaminergic neuron-specific Ret knockout mice that Ret receptor loss does not result in a higher vulnerability of midbrain dopaminergic neurons against MPTP but to less resprouting of left over dopaminergic neuron axons in the striatum after MPTP intoxication.³⁰ In adult mice endogenous GDNF levels are rather low.^{26, 31} Therefore, we could not rule out in that study the possibility, that higher levels of GDNF—as also used in the clinical GDNF trials in PD patients—might have neuroprotective and regenerating effects even in the absence of the Ret receptor. Here we addressed now this question by viral overexpression of GDNF in MPTP-treated mice lacking expression of Ret again specifically in dopaminergic neurons.^{23, 30} We found that in the absence of Ret in dopaminergic neurons even a substantial overexpression of GDNF in the striatum does not have a neuroprotective and regenerative effect. Thus, despite the expression of alternative GDNF receptors on midbrain dopaminergic neurons, the presence of the canonical GDNF receptor Ret seems to be mandatory for mediating GDNF''s beneficial survival and axonal resprouting effect in these neurons.     

A cellular screen identifies ponatinib and pazopanib as inhibitors of necroptosis

Necroptosis is a form of regulated necrotic cell death mediated by receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) and RIPK3. Necroptotic cell death contributes to the pathophysiology of several disorders involving tissue damage, including myocardial infarction, stroke and ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, no inhibitors of necroptosis are currently in clinical use. Here we performed a phenotypic screen for small-molecule inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)-induced necroptosis in Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD)-deficient Jurkat cells using a representative panel of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs. We identified two anti-cancer agents, ponatinib and pazopanib, as submicromolar inhibitors of necroptosis. Both compounds inhibited necroptotic cell death induced by various cell death receptor ligands in human cells, while not protecting from apoptosis. Ponatinib and pazopanib abrogated phosphorylation of mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) upon TNF-α-induced necroptosis, indicating that both agents target a component upstream of MLKL. An unbiased chemical proteomic approach determined the cellular target spectrum of ponatinib, revealing key members of the necroptosis signaling pathway. We validated RIPK1, RIPK3 and transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) as novel, direct targets of ponatinib by using competitive binding, cellular thermal shift and recombinant kinase assays. Ponatinib inhibited both RIPK1 and RIPK3, while pazopanib preferentially targeted RIPK1. The identification of the FDA-approved drugs ponatinib and pazopanib as cellular inhibitors of necroptosis highlights them as potentially interesting for the treatment of pathologies caused or aggravated by necroptotic cell death.Programmed cell death has a crucial role in a variety of biological processes ranging from normal tissue development to diverse pathological conditions.^{1, 2} Necroptosis is a form of regulated cell death that has been shown to occur during pathogen infection or sterile injury-induced inflammation in conditions where apoptosis signaling is compromised.^{3, 4, 5, 6} Given that many viruses have developed strategies to circumvent apoptotic cell death, necroptosis constitutes an important, pro-inflammatory back-up mechanism that limits viral spread in vivo.^{7, 8, 9} In contrast, in the context of sterile inflammation, necroptotic cell death contributes to disease pathology, outlining potential benefits of therapeutic intervention.¹⁰ Necroptosis can be initiated by death receptors of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily,¹¹ Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3),¹² TLR4,¹³ DNA-dependent activator of IFN-regulatory factors¹⁴ or interferon receptors.¹⁵ Downstream signaling is subsequently conveyed via RIPK1¹⁶ or TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β,^{8, 17} and converges on RIPK3-mediated^{13, 18, 19, 20} activation of MLKL.²¹ Phosphorylated MLKL triggers membrane rupture,^{22, 23, 24, 25, 26} releasing pro-inflammatory cellular contents to the extracellular space.²⁷ Studies using the RIPK1 inhibitor necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) ²⁸ or RIPK3-deficient mice have established a role for necroptosis in the pathophysiology of pancreatitis,¹⁹ artherosclerosis,²⁹ retinal cell death,³⁰ ischemic organ damage and ischemia-reperfusion injury in both the kidney³¹ and the heart.³² Moreover, allografts from RIPK3-deficient mice are better protected from rejection, suggesting necroptosis inhibition as a therapeutic option to improve transplant outcome.³³ Besides Nec-1, several tool compounds inhibiting different pathway members have been described,^{12, 16, 21, 34, 35} however, no inhibitors of necroptosis are available for clinical use so far.^{2, 10} In this study we screened a library of FDA approved drugs for the precise purpose of identifying already existing and generally safe chemical agents that could be used as necroptosis inhibitors. We identified the two structurally distinct kinase inhibitors pazopanib and ponatinib as potent blockers of necroptosis targeting the key enzymes RIPK1/3.     

Bak apoptotic pores involve a flexible C-terminal region and juxtaposition of the C-terminal transmembrane domains

Bak and Bax mediate apoptotic cell death by oligomerizing and forming a pore in the mitochondrial outer membrane. Both proteins anchor to the outer membrane via a C-terminal transmembrane domain, although its topology within the apoptotic pore is not known. Cysteine-scanning mutagenesis and hydrophilic labeling confirmed that in healthy mitochondria the Bak α9 segment traverses the outer membrane, with 11 central residues shielded from labeling. After pore formation those residues remained shielded, indicating that α9 does not line a pore. Bak (and Bax) activation allowed linkage of α9 to neighboring α9 segments, identifying an α9:α9 interface in Bak (and Bax) oligomers. Although the linkage pattern along α9 indicated a preferred packing surface, there was no evidence of a dimerization motif. Rather, the interface was invoked in part by Bak conformation change and in part by BH3:groove dimerization. The α9:α9 interaction may constitute a secondary interface in Bak oligomers, as it could link BH3:groove dimers to high-order oligomers. Moreover, as high-order oligomers were generated when α9:α9 linkage in the membrane was combined with α6:α6 linkage on the membrane surface, the α6-α9 region in oligomerized Bak is flexible. These findings provide the first view of Bak carboxy terminus (C terminus) membrane topology within the apoptotic pore.Mitochondrial permeabilization during apoptosis is regulated by the Bcl-2 family of proteins.^{1, 2, 3} Although the Bcl-2 homology 3 (BH3)-only members such as Bid and Bim trigger apoptosis by binding to other family members, the prosurvival members block apoptosis by sequestering their pro-apoptotic relatives. Two remaining members, Bak and Bax, form the apoptotic pore within the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM).Bak and Bax are globular proteins comprising nine α-helices.^{4, 5} They are activated by BH3-only proteins binding to the α2–α5 surface groove,^{6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12} or for Bax, to the α1/α6 ‘rear pocket''.¹³ Binding triggers dissociation of the latch domain (α6–α8) from the core domain (α2–α5), together with exposure of N-terminal epitopes and the BH3 domain.^{6, 7, 14, 15, 16} The exposed BH3 domain then binds to the hydrophobic groove in another Bak or Bax molecule to generate symmetric homodimers.^{6, 7, 14, 17, 18} In addition to dimerizing, parts of activated Bak and Bax associate with the lipid bilayer.¹⁹ In Bax, the α5 and α6 helices may insert into the MOM,²⁰ although recent studies indicate that they lie in-plane on the membrane surface, with the hydrophobic α5 sandwiched between the membrane and a BH3:groove dimer interface.^{7, 21, 22, 23} The dimers can be linked via cysteine residues placed in α6,^{18, 24, 25} and more recently via cysteine residues in either α3 or α5,^{6, 21} allowing detection of the higher-order oligomers associated with pore formation.^{26, 27} However, whether these interactions are required for high-order oligomers and pore formation remains unclear.Like most Bcl-2 members, Bak and Bax are targeted to the MOM via a hydrophobic C-terminal region. The C terminus targets Bak to the MOM in healthy cells,²⁸ whereas the Bax C terminus is either exposed²⁹ or sequestered within the hydrophobic groove until apoptotic signals trigger Bax translocation.^{5, 30, 31} The hydrophobic stretch is important, as substituting polar or charged residues decreased targeting of Bak and Bax.^{10, 32} Mitochondrial targeting is also controlled by basic residues at the far C termini,^{32, 33, 34} and by interaction with VDAC2^{35, 36} via the Bak and Bax C termini.^{37, 38} Retrotranslocation of Bak and Bax was also altered by swapping the C termini.³⁹The membrane topology of the Bak and Bax C termini before and after apoptosis has not been examined directly, due in part to difficulty in reconstituting oligomers of full-length Bak in artificial membranes. Nor is it known whether the C termini contribute to pore formation by promoting oligomerization or disturbing the membrane. To address these questions synthetic peptides based on the Bak and Bax C termini have been studied in model membranes. The peptides adopt a predominantly α-helical secondary structure,^{40, 41, 42, 43} with orientation affected by lipid composition.^{42, 44, 45} The peptides could also permeabilize lipid vesicles,^{41, 43, 46, 47} suggesting that the C termini in full-length Bak and Bax may contribute to pore formation.Here we examined the membrane topology of the C termini within full-length Bak and Bax in the MOM, both before and after apoptotic pore formation. After pore formation the α9 helices of Bak (and of Bax) became juxtaposed but did not line the surface of a pore. The α9:α9 interaction occurred after Bak activation and conformation change, but was promoted by formation of BH3:groove dimers. Combining linkage at more than one interface indicated that the Bak α9:α9 interface can link BH3:groove dimers to high-order oligomers, and moreover, that the α6–α9 region is flexible in oligomerized Bak.     

Alpha-Synuclein affects neurite morphology,autophagy, vesicle transport and axonal degeneration in CNS neurons

Many neuropathological and experimental studies suggest that the degeneration of dopaminergic terminals and axons precedes the demise of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, which finally results in the clinical symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD). The mechanisms underlying this early axonal degeneration are, however, still poorly understood. Here, we examined the effects of overexpression of human wildtype alpha-synuclein (αSyn-WT), a protein associated with PD, and its mutant variants αSyn-A30P and -A53T on neurite morphology and functional parameters in rat primary midbrain neurons (PMN). Moreover, axonal degeneration after overexpression of αSyn-WT and -A30P was analyzed by live imaging in the rat optic nerve in vivo. We found that overexpression of αSyn-WT and of its mutants A30P and A53T impaired neurite outgrowth of PMN and affected neurite branching assessed by Sholl analysis in a variant-dependent manner. Surprisingly, the number of primary neurites per neuron was increased in neurons transfected with αSyn. Axonal vesicle transport was examined by live imaging of PMN co-transfected with EGFP-labeled synaptophysin. Overexpression of all αSyn variants significantly decreased the number of motile vesicles and decelerated vesicle transport compared with control. Macroautophagic flux in PMN was enhanced by αSyn-WT and -A53T but not by αSyn-A30P. Correspondingly, colocalization of αSyn and the autophagy marker LC3 was reduced for αSyn-A30P compared with the other αSyn variants. The number of mitochondria colocalizing with LC3 as a marker for mitophagy did not differ among the groups. In the rat optic nerve, both αSyn-WT and -A30P accelerated kinetics of acute axonal degeneration following crush lesion as analyzed by in vivo live imaging. We conclude that αSyn overexpression impairs neurite outgrowth and augments axonal degeneration, whereas axonal vesicle transport and autophagy are severely altered.Growing evidence suggests that Parkinson''s disease (PD) pathology starts at the presynaptic terminals and the distal axons and is then propagated back to the soma in a ''dying back'' pattern.^{1, 2} Accordingly, at the time of clinical onset, there is only a 30% loss of total substantia nigra pars compacta neurons but a far more severe loss of striatal dopaminergic markers (70–80%), suggesting that axonal terminals of the nigrostriatal pathway are affected earlier.¹ It is thus essential to understand the pathomechanisms specifically affecting the axon in PD in order to interfere with early disease progression.Neurodegeneration in PD is accompanied by the appearance of intraneuronal protein aggregates, denoted Lewy bodies (LBs).³ Interestingly, also LB pathology is initially found in the distal axons before becoming evident in the neuronal somata, and dystrophic neurites, so called ''Lewy neurites'', outnumber LBs in the early stages of PD.^{2, 4, 5} A main component of LBs is the protein alpha-synuclein (αSyn) that is not only widely used as a histopathological marker for PD but is also believed to have a major role in PD pathogenesis.^{6, 7} The importance of αSyn is further underlined by the discovery of αSyn point mutations (e.g. Ala53Thr (A53T), Ala30Pro (A30P)) and multiplications of the αSyn gene, all of which cause autosomal dominant forms of PD.^{8, 9, 10} However, neither the physiological functions nor the pathogenetic mechanisms of αSyn are well understood.⁷The biological effects of αSyn expression strongly depend on the model system. Wild-type (WT) human αSyn does not lead to major clinical or histological abnormalities when expressed in transgenic mice,^{11, 12} but its overexpression mediated by adeno-associated viral vectors (AAV) results in severe neurodegeneration, suggesting a dose-dependent toxic effect.^{13, 14} Different human αSyn-A30P and -A53T transgenic mouse lines develop severe motor impairments, partly resembling symptoms of human PD, accompanied by a degeneration of the nigrostriatal neuronal system and LB-like pathology.^{11, 12, 15} In line with the pathological findings in human PD, the axonal compartment is affected early and most prominently in these animal models.Different putative pathomechanisms of αSyn toxicity have been explored. For example, the cytoskeleton is an important molecular target of αSyn. Multimeric forms of αSyn were shown to impair the polymerization of tubulin and microtubule formation.^{16, 17} Overexpression of αSyn increased actin instability and induced actin bundling in cultured hippocampal neurons.¹⁸ There are, however, divergent data on the resulting effects of αSyn overexpression on neurite outgrowth and integrity in different model systems.^{19, 20, 21, 22}Moreover, a dysregulation of autophagy has been implicated in PD pathology. Aberrant αSyn is normally degraded by autophagy and only to a negligible degree by the proteasome.²³ Several studies have shown that the inhibition of autophagy results in an accumulation and increased toxicity of αSyn, whereas the activation of autophagy has therapeutic effects in PD models.^{23, 24, 25, 26} However, the direct effects of αSyn and its mutants on autophagy seem to rely strongly on the model system and the published data are highly controversial.^{24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32}Given the central role of axonal degeneration in PD, it is likely that disturbances of axonal transport are involved.³³ In support of this proposition, the motor protein kinesin was shown to be decreased early and stage-dependently in PD patients, preceding the loss of substantia nigra neurons.³⁴ αSyn itself is actively transported along the axons, mainly by the slow component of axonal transport, but the role of αSyn in axonal vesicle transport is unclear.³⁵Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of the effects of αSyn on neurite morphology and examine important pathomechanisms.     

Plasma membrane poration by opioid neuropeptides: a possible mechanism of pathological signal transduction

Neuropeptides induce signal transduction across the plasma membrane by acting through cell-surface receptors. The dynorphins, endogenous ligands for opioid receptors, are an exception; they also produce non-receptor-mediated effects causing pain and neurodegeneration. To understand non-receptor mechanism(s), we examined interactions of dynorphins with plasma membrane. Using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and patch-clamp electrophysiology, we demonstrate that dynorphins accumulate in the membrane and induce a continuum of transient increases in ionic conductance. This phenomenon is consistent with stochastic formation of giant (~2.7 nm estimated diameter) unstructured non-ion-selective membrane pores. The potency of dynorphins to porate the plasma membrane correlates with their pathogenic effects in cellular and animal models. Membrane poration by dynorphins may represent a mechanism of pathological signal transduction. Persistent neuronal excitation by this mechanism may lead to profound neuropathological alterations, including neurodegeneration and cell death.Neuropeptides are the largest and most diverse family of neurotransmitters. They are released from axon terminals and dendrites, diffuse to pre- or postsynaptic neuronal structures and activate membrane G-protein-coupled receptors. Prodynorphin (PDYN)-derived opioid peptides including dynorphin A (Dyn A), dynorphin B (Dyn B) and big dynorphin (Big Dyn) consisting of Dyn A and Dyn B are endogenous ligands for the κ-opioid receptor. Acting through this receptor, dynorphins regulate processing of pain and emotions, memory acquisition and modulate reward induced by addictive substances.^{1, 2, 3, 4} Furthermore, dynorphins may produce robust cellular and behavioral effects that are not mediated through opioid receptors.^{5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29} As evident from pharmacological, morphological, genetic and human neuropathological studies, these effects are generally pathological, including cell death, neurodegeneration, neurological dysfunctions and chronic pain. Big Dyn is the most active pathogenic peptide, which is about 10- to 100-fold more potent than Dyn A, whereas Dyn B does not produce non-opioid effects.^{16, 17, 22, 25} Big Dyn enhances activity of acid-sensing ion channel-1a (ASIC1a) and potentiates ASIC1a-mediated cell death in nanomolar concentrations^{30, 31} and, when administered intrathecally, induces characteristic nociceptive behavior at femtomolar doses.^{17, 22} Inhibition of endogenous Big Dyn degradation results in pathological pain, whereas prodynorphin (Pdyn) knockout mice do not maintain neuropathic pain.^{22, 32} Big Dyn differs from its constituents Dyn A and Dyn B in its unique pattern of non-opioid memory-enhancing, locomotor- and anxiolytic-like effects.²⁵Pathological role of dynorphins is emphasized by the identification of PDYN missense mutations that cause profound neurodegeneration in the human brain underlying the SCA23 (spinocerebellar ataxia type 23), a very rare dominantly inherited neurodegenerative disorder.^{27, 33} Most PDYN mutations are located in the Big Dyn domain, demonstrating its critical role in neurodegeneration. PDYN mutations result in marked elevation in dynorphin levels and increase in its pathogenic non-opioid activity.^{27, 34} Dominant-negative pathogenic effects of dynorphins are not produced through opioid receptors.ASIC1a, glutamate NMDA (N-methyl-d-aspartate) and AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid)/kainate ion channels, and melanocortin and bradykinin B2 receptors have all been implicated as non-opioid dynorphin targets.^{5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 30, 31, 35, 36} Multiplicity of these targets and their association with the cellular membrane suggest that their activation is a secondary event triggered by a primary interaction of dynorphins with the membrane. Dynorphins are among the most basic neuropeptides.^{37, 38} The basic nature is also a general property of anti-microbial peptides (AMPs) and amyloid peptides that act by inducing membrane perturbations, altering membrane curvature and causing pore formation that disrupts membrane-associated processes including ion fluxes across the membrane.³⁹ The similarity between dynorphins and these two peptide groups in overall charge and size suggests a similar mode of their interactions with membranes.In this study, we dissect the interactions of dynorphins with the cell membrane, the primary event in their non-receptor actions. Using fluorescence imaging, correlation spectroscopy and patch-clamp techniques, we demonstrate that dynorphin peptides accumulate in the plasma membrane in live cells and cause a profound transient increase in cell membrane conductance. Membrane poration by endogenous neuropeptides may represent a novel mechanism of signal transduction in the brain. This mechanism may underlie effects of dynorphins under pathological conditions including chronic pain and tissue injury.     

Neuritin 1 promotes retinal ganglion cell survival and axonal regeneration following optic nerve crush

Neuritin 1 (Nrn1) is an extracellular glycophosphatidylinositol-linked protein that stimulates axonal plasticity, dendritic arborization and synapse maturation in the central nervous system (CNS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the neuroprotective and axogenic properties of Nrn1 on axotomized retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in vitro and on the in vivo optic nerve crush (ONC) mouse model. Axotomized cultured RGCs treated with recombinant hNRN1 significantly increased survival of RGCs by 21% (n=6–7, P<0.01) and neurite outgrowth in RGCs by 141% compared to controls (n=15, P<0.05). RGC transduction with AAV2-CAG–hNRN1 prior to ONC promoted RGC survival (450%, n=3–7, P<0.05) and significantly preserved RGC function by 70% until 28 days post crush (dpc) (n=6, P<0.05) compared with the control AAV2-CAG–green fluorescent protein transduction group. Significantly elevated levels of RGC marker, RNA binding protein with multiple splicing (Rbpms; 73%, n=5–8, P<0.001) and growth cone marker, growth-associated protein 43 (Gap43; 36%, n=3, P<0.01) were observed 28 dpc in the retinas of the treatment group compared with the control group. Significant increase in Gap43 (100%, n=5–6, P<0.05) expression was observed within the optic nerves of the AAV2–hNRN1 group compared to controls. In conclusion, Nrn1 exhibited neuroprotective, regenerative effects and preserved RGC function on axotomized RGCs in vitro and after axonal injury in vivo. Nrn1 is a potential therapeutic target for CNS neurodegenerative diseases.Central nervous system (CNS) trauma and neurodegenerative disorders trigger a cascade of intrinsic and extrinsic cellular events resulting in regenerative failure and subsequent damage to neurons.^{1, 2, 3, 4, 5} The intrinsic factors include deregulation in growth-promoting factors, apoptotic factors, intracellular signaling molecules and trophic factors.⁶ Similarly, the extrinsic factors correlate to growth inhibition due to inhibitory cues^{3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13} that include myelin and myelin associated inhibitors, glial scarring,^{5, 14} slow clearance of axonal debris,⁷ incorrect development of neuronal projections⁶ and CNS inflammation.^{15, 16} Progressive degeneration of mature retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) has been associated with loss of trophic support,^{8, 9} detrimental inflammatory processes/immune regulation^{10, 11} and apoptotic effectors.^{9, 12, 13, 15, 17}After injury, mammalian RGC axons show only a short-lived sprouting response but no long-distance regeneration through the optic nerve (ON).¹⁶ Glial responses around the affected area are initiated by injured CNS axons.¹⁸ Axons undergoing Wallerian degeneration are surrounded by astrocytes that upregulate glial fibrillary acidic protein (Gfap) expression and these reactive astrocytes contribute to trauma-induced neurodegeneration.¹⁹ Glial scarring inhibits axonal transport after ON crush (ONC)^{5, 14} decreasing transport of proteins involved in neuroprotection and synaptic plasticity. Regenerative failure is a critical endpoint of these destructive triggers culminating in neuronal apoptosis^{3, 20, 21} and inhibition of functional recovery. Intrinsic factors affecting axonal regeneration after CNS injury are crucial for recovery and thus, dysregulation of genes involved in axonal plasticity and outgrowth can prove detrimental to the neuronal recovery.^{22, 23, 24}Current neuroprotection approaches include promoting survival of RGCs by intraocular injections of recombinant factors like ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) and peripheral nerve (PN) transplantations in vitro²⁵ and in vivo after injury.²⁶ Studies performed with glial cell-line-derived neurotrophic factor and neurturin protect RGCs from axotomy-induced apoptosis.²⁷ Further, in the ON injury model, RGC survival was promoted after deletion of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein homologous protein²⁸ and enhanced regeneration observed with co-deletion of kruppel-like factor 4 (Klf4) and suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (Socs3).²⁹ Intraocular administration of neurotrophin-4 (NT-4) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) after ON transection has also exerted neuroprotective effects on axotomized RGCs. In addition, PNs transplanted adjacent to ONs, ex vivo PN grafts with lenti-viral transduced Schwann cells, and stimulation of inflammatory processes have strong pro-regenerative effects on injured RGCs.^{26, 30, 31, 32, 33}In addition, using adeno-associated-virus (AAV) therapy, AAV mediated expression of CNTF in bcl2 overexpressing transgenic mice increases cell viability and axonal regeneration,³⁴ whereas BDNF promotes survival of RGCs.³⁵ Likewise, experiments with AAV–BDNF, –CNTF and –growth-associated protein 43 (GAP43) have shown that AAV–CNTF was the most crucial for promoting both long-term survival and regeneration.³⁶ The positive effects of CNTF are observed mainly through simultaneous deletion of both PTEN and SOCS3³⁷ and the concurrent activation of mTOR and STAT3 pathways.³⁸ Although CNTF shows robust increase and sustained axon regeneration in injured ONs of rodents, it causes axonal misguidance and aberrant growth.³⁹ Furthermore, it has been shown that CNTF acts as a chemoattractant. CNTF administration onto autologous PN grafts transplanted within transected ON increased regeneration, but these effects were significantly reduced after removal of macrophages from this site.⁴⁰ In addition, the effects of CNTF using PN grafts at ON transection sites are further subject to debate, as previously it has been shown that Ad-CNTF injections preserved RGC axons but did not induce regeneration of axotomized RGCs.⁴¹ Thus, other studies have addressed RGC survivability and axonal regeneration with CNTF and other growth factors,^{35, 36} but most trophic factors affect neuronal survival and regeneration differentially.Previous studies targeting neuronal apoptosis by overexpressing intrinsic growth factors, inhibiting apoptosis and enhancing regeneration in CNS trauma models have established that a multifactorial approach is required for successful and long-lasting therapeutic outcomes.^{6, 36} Current gaps still exist for a key gene that could effectively target neuroprotection, enhance neuron regeneration and sustain neuronal function.One key gene implicated in neuronal plasticity is Neuritin 1 (Nrn1), also known as candidate plasticity gene 15. It has multiple functions and was first identified and characterized when screening for candidate plasticity genes in the rat hippocampal dentate gyrus activated by kainate.^{42, 43, 44} Nrn1 is highly conserved across species⁴⁵ and translates to an extracellular, glycophosphatidylinositol-linked protein (GPI-linked protein), which can be secreted as a soluble form. Nrn1 stimulates axonal plasticity, dendritic arborization and synapse maturation in the CNS.⁴⁶ During early embryonic development, Nrn1 promotes the survival of neural progenitors and differentiated neurons,⁴⁷ while later in development it promotes axonal and dendritic growth and stabilization, allowing maturation and formation of synapses.^{43, 46, 48} In the adult brain, Nrn1 has been correlated with activity-dependent functional plasticity^{45, 49} and is expressed in post mitotic neurons.Nrn1 may be a crucial gene for neuroprotection and regeneration because growth factors such as nerve growth factor (NGF), BDNF and NT-3 as well as neuronal activity can potentiate the expression of Nrn1.^{44, 50} In addition, we reported that Nrn1 mRNA expression appears to be biphasic after ON axonal trauma, indicating a transient attempt by RGCs at neuroprotection/neuroregeneration in response to ONC injury.⁵¹ The dynamic regulation of Nrn1 coupled with neurotrophic effects may promote axonal regeneration in the CNS. To overcome CNS trauma, a new therapy geared towards neuroprotection and effective axonal regeneration is required to enhance a future multifactorial approach. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic effects of Nrn1 in mouse RGC cultures as well as in the mouse ONC model. We have identified a distinct neuroprotective and regenerative strategy that prevents neurodegeneration after ON injury. AAV2–hNRN1 expression vectors partially rescued RGCs from apoptosis, maintained RGC function, and initiated regeneration of injured axons.     

Distinct roles of RIP1–RIP3 hetero- and RIP3–RIP3 homo-interaction in mediating necroptosis

Necroptosis is mediated by a signaling complex called necrosome, containing receptor-interacting protein (RIP)1, RIP3, and mixed-lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL). It is known that RIP1 and RIP3 form heterodimeric filamentous scaffold in necrosomes through their RIP homotypic interaction motif (RHIM) domain-mediated oligomerization, but the signaling events based on this scaffold has not been fully addressed. By using inducible dimer systems we found that RIP1–RIP1 interaction is dispensable for necroptosis; RIP1–RIP3 interaction is required for necroptosis signaling, but there is no necroptosis if no additional RIP3 protein is recruited to the RIP1–RIP3 heterodimer, and the interaction with RIP1 promotes the RIP3 to recruit other RIP3; RIP3–RIP3 interaction is required for necroptosis and RIP3–RIP3 dimerization is sufficient to induce necroptosis; and RIP3 dimer-induced necroptosis requires MLKL. We further show that RIP3 oligomer is not more potent than RIP3 dimer in triggering necroptosis, suggesting that RIP3 homo-interaction in the complex, rather than whether RIP3 has formed homo polymer, is important for necroptosis. RIP3 dimerization leads to RIP3 intramolecule autophosphorylation, which is required for the recruitment of MLKL. Interestingly, phosphorylation of one of RIP3 in the dimer is sufficient to induce necroptosis. As RIP1–RIP3 heterodimer itself cannot induce necroptosis, the RIP1–RIP3 heterodimeric amyloid fibril is unlikely to directly propagate necroptosis. We propose that the signaling events after the RIP1–RIP3 amyloid complex assembly are the recruitment of free RIP3 by the RIP3 in the amyloid scaffold followed by autophosphorylation of RIP3 and subsequent recruitment of MLKL by RIP3 to execute necroptosis.Necroptosis is a type of programmed necrosis characterized by necrotic morphological changes, including cellular organelle swelling, cell membrane rupture,^{1, 2, 3} and dependence of receptor-interacting protein (RIP)1⁴ and RIP3.^{5, 6, 7} Physiological function of necroptosis has been illustrated in host defense,^{8, 9, 10, 11} inflammation,^{12, 13, 14, 15, 16} tissue injury,^{10, 17, 18} and development.^{19, 20, 21}Necroptosis can be induced by a number of different extracellular stimuli such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF). TNF stimulation leads to formation of TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1) signaling complex (named complex I), and complex II containing RIP1, TRADD, FAS-associated protein with a death domain (FADD), and caspase-8, of which the activation initiates apoptosis. If cells have high level of RIP3, RIP1 recruits RIP3 to form necrosome containing FADD,^{22, 23, 24} caspase-8, RIP1, and RIP3, and the cells undergo necroptosis.^{25, 26} Caspase-8 and FADD negatively regulates necroptosis,^{27, 28, 29, 30} because RIP1, RIP3, and CYLD are potential substrates of caspase-8.^{31, 32, 33, 34} Necrosome also suppresses apoptosis but the underlying mechanism has not been described yet. Mixed-lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL) is downstream of RIP3,^{35, 36} and phosphorylation of MLKL is required for necroptosis.^{37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42}Apoptosis inducing complex (complex II) and necrosome are both supramolecular complexes.^{43, 44, 45} A recent study showed that RIP1 and RIP3 form amyloidal fibrils through their RIP homotypic interaction motif⁴⁶ (RHIM)-mediated polymerization, and suggested that amyloidal structure is essential for necroptosis signaling.⁴⁷ The RIP1–RIP3 heterodimeric amyloid complex is believed to function as a scaffold that brings signaling proteins into proximity to permit their activation. However, RIP1 and RIP3 also can each form fibrils on their own RHIM domains in vitro. It is unclear how the homo- and hetero-interactions are coordinated and organized on the amyloid scaffold to execute their functions in necroptosis. Here, we used inducible dimerization systems to study the roles of RIP1–RIP1, RIP1–RIP3, and RIP3–RIP3 interactions in necroptosis signaling. Our data suggested that it is the RIP1–RIP3 interaction in the RIP1–RIP3 heterodimeric amyloid complex that empowers to recruit other free RIP3; homodimerization of RIP3 triggers its autophosphorylation and only the phosphorylated RIP3 can recruit MLKL to execute necroptosis.