Structural basis of response regulator inhibition by a bacterial anti-activator protein

The complex interplay between the response regulator ComA, the anti-activator RapF, and the signaling peptide PhrF controls competence development in Bacillus subtilis. More specifically, ComA drives the expression of genetic competence genes, while RapF inhibits the interaction of ComA with its target promoters. The signaling peptide PhrF accumulates at high cell density and upregulates genetic competence by antagonizing the interaction of RapF and ComA. How RapF functions mechanistically to inhibit ComA activity and how PhrF in turn antagonizes the RapF-ComA interaction were unknown. Here we present the X-ray crystal structure of RapF in complex with the ComA DNA binding domain. Along with biochemical and genetic studies, the X-ray crystal structure reveals how RapF mechanistically regulates ComA function. Interestingly, we found that a RapF surface mimics DNA to block ComA binding to its target promoters. Furthermore, RapF is a monomer either alone or in complex with PhrF, and it undergoes a conformational change upon binding to PhrF, which likely causes the dissociation of ComA from the RapF-ComA complex. Finally, we compare the structure of RapF complexed with the ComA DNA binding domain and the structure of RapH complexed with Spo0F. This comparison reveals that RapF and RapH have strikingly similar overall structures, and that they have evolved different, non-overlapping surfaces to interact with diverse cellular targets. To our knowledge, the data presented here reveal the first atomic level insight into the inhibition of response regulator DNA binding by an anti-activator. Compounds that affect the interaction of Rap and Rap-like proteins with their target domains could serve to regulate medically and commercially important phenotypes in numerous Bacillus species, such as sporulation in B. anthracis and sporulation and the production of Cry protein endotoxin in B. thuringiensis.     

Modulation of the ComA-dependent quorum response in Bacillus subtilis by multiple Rap proteins and Phr peptides

In Bacillus subtilis, extracellular peptide signaling regulates several biological processes. Secreted Phr signaling peptides are imported into the cell and act intracellularly to antagonize the activity of regulators known as Rap proteins. B. subtilis encodes several Rap proteins and Phr peptides, and the processes regulated by many of these Rap proteins and Phr peptides are unknown. We used DNA microarrays to characterize the roles that several rap-phr signaling modules play in regulating gene expression. We found that rapK-phrK regulates the expression of a number of genes activated by the response regulator ComA. ComA activates expression of genes involved in competence development and the production of several secreted products. Two Phr peptides, PhrC and PhrF, were previously known to stimulate the activity of ComA. We assayed the roles that PhrC, PhrF, and PhrK play in regulating gene expression and found that these three peptides stimulate ComA-dependent gene expression to different levels and are all required for full expression of genes activated by ComA. The involvement of multiple Rap proteins and Phr peptides allows multiple physiological cues to be integrated into a regulatory network that modulates the timing and magnitude of the ComA response.     

Bacillus subtilis RapA phosphatase domain interaction with its substrate, phosphorylated Spo0F, and its inhibitor, the PhrA peptide

Rap proteins in Bacillus subtilis regulate the phosphorylation level or the DNA-binding activity of response regulators such as Spo0F, involved in sporulation initiation, or ComA, regulating competence development. Rap proteins can be inhibited by specific peptides generated by the export-import processing pathway of the Phr proteins. Rap proteins have a modular organization comprising an amino-terminal alpha-helical domain connected to a domain formed by six tetratricopeptide repeats (TPR). In this study, the molecular basis for the specificity of the RapA phosphatase for its substrate, phosphorylated Spo0F (Spo0F～P), and its inhibitor pentapeptide, PhrA, was analyzed in part by generating chimeric proteins with RapC, which targets the DNA-binding domain of ComA, rather than Spo0F～P, and is inhibited by the PhrC pentapeptide. In vivo analysis of sporulation efficiency or competence-induced gene expression, as well as in vitro biochemical assays, allowed the identification of the amino-terminal 60 amino acids as sufficient to determine Rap specificity for its substrate and the central TPR3 to TPR5 (TPR3-5) repeats as providing binding specificity toward the Phr peptide inhibitor. The results allowed the prediction and testing of key residues in RapA that are essential for PhrA binding and specificity, thus demonstrating how the widespread structural fold of the TPR is highly versatile, using a common interaction mechanism for a variety of functions in eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms.     

Molecular analysis of Phr peptide processing in Bacillus subtilis

In Bacillus subtilis, an export-import pathway regulates production of the Phr pentapeptide inhibitors of Rap proteins. Processing of the Phr precursor proteins into the active pentapeptide form is a key event in the initiation of sporulation and competence development. The PhrA (ARNQT) and PhrE (SRNVT) peptides inhibit the RapA and RapE phosphatases, respectively, whose activity is directed toward the Spo0F approximately P intermediate response regulator of the sporulation phosphorelay. The PhrC (ERGMT) peptide inhibits the RapC protein acting on the ComA response regulator for competence with regard to DNA transformation. The structural organization of PhrA, PhrE, and PhrC suggested a role for type I signal peptidases in the processing of the Phr preinhibitor, encoded by the phr genes, into the proinhibitor form. The proinhibitor was then postulated to be cleaved to the active pentapeptide inhibitor by an additional enzyme. In this report, we provide evidence that Phr preinhibitor proteins are subject to only one processing event at the peptide bond on the amino-terminal end of the pentapeptide. This processing event is most likely independent of type I signal peptidase activity. In vivo and in vitro analyses indicate that none of the five signal peptidases of B. subtilis (SipS, SipT, SipU, SipV, and SipW) are indispensable for Phr processing. However, we show that SipV and SipT have a previously undescribed role in sporulation, competence, and cell growth.     

Pentapeptide regulation of aspartyl-phosphate phosphatases

Aspartyl-phosphate phosphatases are integral components of the phosphorelay signal transduction system for sporulation initiation in Bacillus subtilis. The Rap and Spo0E families of protein phosphatases specifically dephosphorylate the sporulation response regulators Spo0F and Spo0A, respectively. The phosphatases interpret regulatory signals antithetical to sporulation and the Rap phosphatases are subject to inactivation by specific pentapeptides generated from an inactive peptide precursor. Additional regulatory signals are brought about by the complex activation circuit that generates the Phr pentapeptide inhibitors of Rap phosphatases. Phr peptide's recognition of the Rap phosphatase targets is remarkably specific. Specificity is dictated by the amino acid sequence of the pentapeptide. The identification of tetratricopeptide repeats in the Rap proteins may explain the mechanism by which Phr peptides bind to and inhibit the activity of Rap phosphatases.     

Forty Years in the Making: Understanding the Molecular Mechanism of Peptide Regulation in Bacterial Development

Signal transduction systems are influenced by positive and negative forces resulting in an output reflecting the sum of the opposing forces. The Rap family of regulatory protein modules control the output of two-component signal transduction systems through protein∶protein and protein∶peptide interactions. These modules and their peptide regulators are found in complex signaling pathways, including the bacterial developmental pathway to sporulation, competence, and protease secretion. Two articles published in the current issue of PLOS Biology reveal by means of crystallographic analyses how the Rap proteins of bacilli are regulated by their inhibitor Phr peptide and provide a mechanistic explanation for a genetic phenotype isolated decades earlier. The Rap-Phr module of bacterial regulators was the prototype of a family that now extends to other bacterial signaling proteins that involve the use of the tetratricopeptide repeat structural fold. The results invite speculation regarding the potential exploitation of this module as a molecular tool for applications in therapeutic design and biotechnology.Cell signaling by oligopeptides is a critical component of the biology of eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. In microorganisms such as Gram-positive bacteria, small peptides have been found to regulate a variety of cellular functions, providing the bacteria with the ability to communicate and change behavior of the same or of other species in response to conditions and perturbations of the environment [1]. Studies in the spore-forming model organism Bacillus subtilis were among the first to identify pathways in which peptide signaling played a regulatory role.     

An atypical Phr peptide regulates the developmental switch protein RapH

Under conditions of nutrient limitation and high population density, the bacterium Bacillus subtilis can initiate a variety of developmental pathways. The signaling systems regulating B. subtilis differentiation are tightly controlled by switch proteins called Raps, named after the founding members of the family, which were shown to be response regulator aspartate phosphatases. A phr gene encoding a secreted pentapeptide that regulates the activity of its associated Rap protein was previously identified downstream of 8 of the chromosomally encoded rap genes. We identify and validate here the sequence of an atypical Phr peptide, PhrH, by in vivo and in vitro analyses. Using a luciferase reporter bioassay combined with in vitro experiments, we found that PhrH is a hexapeptide (TDRNTT), in contrast to the other characterized Phr pentapeptides. We also determined that phrH expression is driven by a promoter lying within rapH. Unlike the previously identified dedicated σ(H)-driven phr promoters, it appears that phrH expression most likely requires σ(A). Furthermore, we show that PhrH can antagonize both of the known activities of RapH: the dephosphorylation of Spo0F and the sequestration of ComA, thus promoting the development of spores and the competent state. Finally, we propose that PhrH is the prototype of a newly identified class of Phr signaling molecules consisting of six amino acids. This class likely includes PhrI, which regulates RapI and the expression, excision, and transfer of the mobile genetic element ICEBs1.     

Global regulatory systems operating in Bacilysin biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis

In Bacillus subtilis, bacilysin is a nonribosomally synthesized dipeptide antibiotic composed of L-alanine and L-anticapsin. The biosynthesis of bacilysin depends on the bacABCDEywfG operon (bac operon)and the adjacent ywfH gene. To elucidate the effects of global regulatory genes on the expression of bac operon, we used the combination of lacZ fusion analysis and the gel mobility shift assays. The cell density-dependent transition state induction of the bac operon was clearly shown. The basal expression level of the bac operon as well as transition state induction of bac is directly ComA dependent. Three Phr peptides, PhrC, PhrF and PhrK, are required for full-level expression of ComA-dependent bac operon expression, but the most important role seemed to be played by PhrC in stimulating bac expression through a RapC-independent manner. Spo0A is another positive regulator which participates in the transition state induction of bac both directly by interacting with the bac promoter and indirectly by repressing abrB expression. AbrB and CodY proteins do not only directly repress the bac promoter, but they also mutually stimulate the transition state induction of bac indirectly, most likely by antagonizing their repressive effects without preventing each other's binding since both proteins can bind to the bac promoter simultaneously.     

Structural basis of response regulator dephosphorylation by Rap phosphatases

Bacterial Rap family proteins have been most extensively studied in Bacillus subtilis, where they regulate activities including sporulation, genetic competence, antibiotic expression, and the movement of the ICEBs1 transposon. One subset of Rap proteins consists of phosphatases that control B. subtilis and B. anthracis sporulation by dephosphorylating the response regulator Spo0F. The mechanistic basis of Rap phosphatase activity was unknown. Here we present the RapH-Spo0F X-ray crystal structure, which shows that Rap proteins consist of a 3-helix bundle and a tetratricopeptide repeat domain. Extensive biochemical and genetic functional studies reveal the importance of the observed RapH-Spo0F interactions, including the catalytic role of a glutamine in the RapH 3-helix bundle that inserts into the Spo0F active site. We show that in addition to dephosphorylating Spo0F, RapH can antagonize sporulation by sterically blocking phosphoryl transfer to and from Spo0F. Our structure-function analysis of the RapH-Spo0F interaction identified Rap protein residues critical for Spo0F phosphatase activity. This information enabled us to assign Spo0F phosphatase activity to a Rap protein based on sequence alone, which was not previously possible. Finally, as the ultimate test of our newfound understanding of the structural requirements for Rap phosphatase function, a non-phosphatase Rap protein that inhibits the binding of the response regulator ComA to DNA was rationally engineered to dephosphorylate Spo0F. In addition to revealing the mechanistic basis of response regulator dephosphorylation by Rap proteins, our studies support the previously proposed T-loop-Y allostery model of receiver domain regulation that restricts the aromatic "switch" residue to an internal position when the β4-α4 loop adopts an active-site proximal conformation.     

Functional interaction between Galpha(z) and Rap1GAP suggests a novel form of cellular cross-talk

G(z) is a member of the G(i) family of trimeric G proteins whose primary role in cell physiology is still unknown. In an ongoing effort to elucidate the cellular functions of G(z), the yeast two-hybrid system was employed to identify proteins that specifically interact with a mutationally activated form of Galpha(z). One of the molecules uncovered in this screen was Rap1GAP, a previously identified protein that specifically stimulates GTP hydrolytic activity of the monomeric G protein Rap1 and thus is believed to function as a down-regulator of Rap1 signaling. Like G(z), the precise role of Rap1 in cell physiology is poorly understood. Biochemical analysis using purified recombinant proteins revealed that the physical interaction between Galpha(z) and Rap1GAP blocks the ability of RGSs (regulators of G protein signaling) to stimulate GTP hydrolysis of the alpha subunit, and also attenuates the ability of activated Galpha(z) to inhibit adenylyl cyclase. Structure-function analyses indicate that the first 74 amino-terminal residues of Rap1GAP, a region distinct from the catalytic core domain responsible for the GAP activity toward Rap1, is required for this interaction. Co-precipitation assays revealed that Galpha(z), Rap1GAP, and Rap1 can form a stable complex. These data suggest that Rap1GAP acts as a signal integrator to somehow coordinate and/or integrate G(z) signaling and Rap1 signaling in cells.