DNA repair of clustered lesions in mammalian cells: involvement of non-homologous end-joining

Clustered lesions are defined as ≥two lesions within 20 bps and are generated in DNA by ionizing radiation. In vitro studies and work in bacteria have shown that attempted repair of two closely opposed lesions can result in the formation of double strand breaks (DSBs). Since mammalian cells can repair DSBs by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), we hypothesized that NHEJ would repair DSBs formed during the removal of clustered tetrahydrofurans (furans). However, two opposing furans situated 2, 5 or 12 bps apart in a firefly luciferase reporter plasmid caused a decrease in luciferase activity in wild-type, Ku80 or DNA-PKcs-deficient cells, indicating the generation of DSBs. Loss of luciferase activity was maximal at 5 bps apart and studies using siRNA implicate the major AP endonuclease in the initial cleavage. Since NHEJ-deficient cells had equivalent luciferase activity to their isogenic wild-type cells, NHEJ was not involved in accurate repair of clustered lesions. However, quantitation and examination of re-isolated DNA showed that damage-containing plasmids were inaccurately repaired by Ku80-dependent, as well as Ku80-independent mechanisms. This work indicates that not even NHEJ can completely prevent the conversion of clustered lesions to potentially lethal DSBs, so demonstrating the biological relevance of ionizing radiation-induced clustered damage.     

Mycobacterial nonhomologous end joining mediates mutagenic repair of chromosomal double-strand DNA breaks

Bacterial nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) is a recently described DNA repair pathway best characterized in mycobacteria. Bacterial NHEJ proteins LigD and Ku have been analyzed biochemically, and their roles in linear plasmid repair in vivo have been verified genetically; yet the contributions of NHEJ to repair of chromosomal DNA damage are unknown. Here we use an extensive set of NHEJ- and homologous recombination (HR)-deficient Mycobacterium smegmatis strains to probe the importance of HR and NHEJ in repairing diverse types of chromosomal DNA damage. An M. smegmatis Delta recA Delta ku double mutant has no apparent growth defect in vitro. Loss of the NHEJ components Ku and LigD had no effect on sensitivity to UV radiation, methyl methanesulfonate, or quinolone antibiotics. NHEJ deficiency had no effect on sensitivity to ionizing radiation in logarithmic- or early-stationary-phase cells but was required for ionizing radiation resistance in late stationary phase in 7H9 but not LB medium. In addition, NHEJ components were required for repair of I-SceI mediated chromosomal double-strand breaks (DSBs), and in the absence of HR, the NHEJ pathway rapidly mutates the chromosomal break site. The molecular outcomes of NHEJ-mediated chromosomal DSB repair involve predominantly single-nucleotide insertions at the break site, similar to previous findings using plasmid substrates. These findings demonstrate that prokaryotic NHEJ is specifically required for DSB repair in late stationary phase and can mediate mutagenic repair of homing endonuclease-generated chromosomal DSBs.     

Repair of DNA double strand breaks by non-homologous end joining

DNA double strand breaks (DSB) are the most serious form of DNA damage. If not repaired they can lead to cell death. If misrepaired DSBs contribute to chromosomal aberrations and genomic instability. Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) is one of two major pathways for the repair of DSBs in human cells. Proteins known to be required for NHEJ include the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), XRCC4, DNA ligase IV, and Artemis. This review discusses how these and other accessory proteins may function in the repair of DSBs produced by ionizing radiation (IR) and by V(D)J recombination.     

Yeast Pol4 Promotes Tel1-Regulated Chromosomal Translocations

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are one of the most dangerous DNA lesions, since their erroneous repair by nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) can generate harmful chromosomal rearrangements. PolX DNA polymerases are well suited to extend DSB ends that cannot be directly ligated due to their particular ability to bind to and insert nucleotides at the imperfect template-primer structures formed during NHEJ. Herein, we have devised genetic assays in yeast to induce simultaneous DSBs in different chromosomes in vivo. The repair of these breaks in trans could result in reciprocal chromosomal translocations that were dependent on classical Ku-dependent NHEJ. End-joining events leading to translocations were mainly based on the formation of short base pairing between 3′-overhanging DNA ends coupled to gap-filling DNA synthesis. A major proportion of these events were specifically dependent on yeast DNA polymerase Pol4 activity. In addition, we have discovered that Pol4-Thr⁵⁴⁰ amino acid residue can be phosphorylated by Tel1/ATM kinase, which could modulate Pol4 activity during NHEJ. Our data suggest that the role of Tel1 in preventing break-induced chromosomal translocations can, to some extent, be due to its stimulating effect on gap-filling activity of Pol4 to repair DSBs in cis. Overall, this work provides further insight to the molecular mechanisms of DSB repair by NHEJ and presents a new perspective to the understanding of how chromosomal translocations are formed in eukaryotic cells.     

Rapid repair of DNA double strand breaks in Arabidopsis thaliana is dependent on proteins involved in chromosome structure maintenance

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are one of the most cytotoxic forms of DNA damage and must be repaired by recombination, predominantly via non-homologous joining of DNA ends (NHEJ) in higher eukaryotes. However, analysis of DSB repair kinetics of plant NHEJ mutants atlig4-4 and atku80 with the neutral comet assay shows that alternative DSB repair pathways are active. Surprisingly, these kinetic measurements show that DSB repair was faster in the NHEJ mutant lines than in wild-type Arabidopsis.Here we provide the first characterization of this KU-independent, rapid DSB repair pathway operating in Arabidopsis. The alternate pathway that rapidly removes the majority of DSBs present in nuclear DNA depends upon structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complex proteins, namely MIM/AtRAD18 and AtRAD21.1. An absolute requirement for SMC proteins and kleisin for rapid repair of DSBs in Arabidopsis opens new insight into the mechanism of DSB removal in plants.     

Non-homologous DNA end joining

DNA double strand breaks (DSB) are the most serious form of DNA damage. Repair of DSBs is important to prevent chromosomal fragmentation, translocations and deletions. Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) is one of three major pathways for the repair of DSBs in human cells. In this process two DNA ends are joined directly, usually with no sequence homology, although in the case of same polarity of the single stranded overhangs in DSBs, regions of microhomology are utilized. NHEJ is typically imprecise, a characteristic that is useful for immune diversification in lymphocytes in V(D)J recombination. The main components of the NHEJ system in eukaryotes are the catalytic subunit of DNA protein kinase (DNA-PKcs), Ku proteins, XRCC4, DNA ligase IV, and Artemis. This review focuses on the mechanisms an dregulation of DSB repair by NHEJ in mammalian cells.     

DNA joint dependence of pol X family polymerase action in nonhomologous end joining

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) can be rejoined directly by the nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway of repair. Nucleases and polymerases are required to promote accurate NHEJ when the terminal bases of the DSB are damaged. The same enzymes also participate in imprecise rejoining and joining of incompatible ends, important mutagenic events. Previous work has shown that the Pol X family polymerase Pol4 is required for some but not all NHEJ events that require gap filling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here, we systematically analyzed DSB end configurations and found that gaps on both strands and overhang polarity are the principal factors that determine whether a joint requires Pol4. DSBs with 3'-overhangs and a gap on each strand strongly depended on Pol4 for repair, DSBs with 5'-overhangs of the same sequence did not. Pol4 was not required when 3'-overhangs contained a gap on only one strand, however. Pol4 was equally required at 3'-overhangs of all lengths within the NHEJ-dependent range but was dispensable outside of this range, indicating that Pol4 is specific to NHEJ. Loss of Pol4 did not affect the rejoining of DSBs that utilized a recessed microhomology or DSBs bearing 5'-hydroxyls but no gap. Finally, mammalian Pol X polymerases were able to differentially complement a pol4 mutation depending on the joint structure, demonstrating that these polymerases can participate in yeast NHEJ but with distinct properties.     

DNA repair and chromosomal alterations

All mutagenic agents induce lesions in the cellular DNA and they are repaired efficiently by different repair mechanisms. Un-repaired and mis-repaired lesions lead to chromosomal aberrations (CAs). Depending upon the mutagenic agents involved, different DNA repair pathways, such as nucleotide excision repair (NER), base excision repair (BER), non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), homologous recombination repair (HRR), cross-link repair (FANC), single strand annealing (SSA) etc., are operative. Following ionising radiation, DNA double strand breaks (DSBs, which are considered to be the most important leasion leading to observed biological effects) are repaired either by NHEJ and/or HRR. We have investigated the relative role of these two repair pathways leading to chromosomal aberrations using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) mutant cells deficient in one of these two repair pathwatys. NHEJ operates both in G1 and G2 phases of the cell cycle, wheras HHR operates mainly in S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. In NHEJ-deficient mutant cells irradiated in G1, un-repaired double strand breaks reaching S phase are repaired (unexpectedly with a large mis-repair component) by HRR. In HRR-deficient mutant cells, un-repaired DSBs reaching S phase are repaired by NHEJ (unexpectedly with a low mis-repair component) as evidenced by the frequencies of chromatid type aberrations. Employing a similar approach, following treatment with benzo(alpha)pyrene-7,8diol-9,10epoxide (BPDE), the active metabolite of benzo(alpha)pyrene, NER and HRR seem to be the most important repair pathways protecting against chromosomal damage induced by this agent. In the case of acetaldehyde, (primary metabolite of alcohol in vivo) a DNA cross-linking agent, HRR and FANC pathways are important for protection against damage induced by this agent. Irrespective of the type of DNA lesions induced, ultimately they have to be converted to DSBs in order to give rise to CA. Therefore, both NHEJ and HRR are also involved to some extent in the origin of CA following treatment with S-dependent agents.The relative importance of different repair pathways in bestowing protection against DNA damage leading to chromosomal alterations is discussed.     

DNA Damage Signalling and Repair in Dictyostelium discoideum

Repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) is critical for the maintenance of genome integrity. DNA DSBs can be repaired by either homologous recombination (HR) or nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ). Whilst HR requires sequences homologous to thedamaged DNA template in order to facilitate repair, NHEJ occurs through recognition of DNA DSBs by a variety of proteins that process and rejoin DNA termini by direct ligation. Here we review two recent reports that NHEJ is conserved in the social amoebaDictyostelium discoideum. Certain components of the mammalian NHEJ pathway that are absent in genetically tractable organisms such as yeast are present in Dictyostelium and we discuss potential directions for future research, in addition to considering this organism as a genetic model system for the study of NHEJ in vivo.     

DNA Ligase C1 Mediates the LigD-Independent Nonhomologous End-Joining Pathway of Mycobacterium smegmatis

Nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) is a recently described bacterial DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway that has been best characterized for mycobacteria. NHEJ can religate transformed linear plasmids, repair ionizing radiation (IR)-induced DSBs in nonreplicating cells, and seal I-SceI-induced chromosomal DSBs. The core components of the mycobacterial NHEJ machinery are the DNA end binding protein Ku and the polyfunctional DNA ligase LigD. LigD has three autonomous enzymatic modules: ATP-dependent DNA ligase (LIG), DNA/RNA polymerase (POL), and 3′ phosphoesterase (PE). Although genetic ablation of ku or ligD abolishes NHEJ and sensitizes nonreplicating cells to ionizing radiation, selective ablation of the ligase activity of LigD in vivo only mildly impairs NHEJ of linearized plasmids, indicating that an additional DNA ligase can support NHEJ. Additionally, the in vivo role of the POL and PE domains in NHEJ is unclear. Here we define a LigD ligase-independent NHEJ pathway in Mycobacterium smegmatis that requires the ATP-dependent DNA ligase LigC1 and the POL domain of LigD. Mycobacterium tuberculosis LigC can also support this backup NHEJ pathway. We also demonstrate that, although dispensable for efficient plasmid NHEJ, the activities of the POL and PE domains are required for repair of IR-induced DSBs in nonreplicating cells. These findings define the genetic requirements for a LigD-independent NHEJ pathway in mycobacteria and demonstrate that all enzymatic functions of the LigD protein participate in NHEJ in vivo.     

Non-homologous DNA end joining in the mature rat brain

Recent evidence suggests that DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are introduced in neurons during the course of normal development, and that repair of such DSBs is essential for neuronal survival. Here we describe a non-homologous DNA end joining (NHEJ) system in the adult rat brain that may be used to repair DNA DSBs. In the brain NHEJ system, blunt DNA ends are joined with lower efficiency than cohesive or non-matching protruding ends. Moreover, brain NHEJ is blocked by DNA ligase inhibitors or by dATP and can occur in the presence or absence of exogenously added ATP. Comparison of NHEJ activities in several tissues showed that brain and testis share similar mechanisms for DNA end joining, whereas the activity in thymus seems to utilize different mechanisms than in the nervous system. The developmental profile of brain NHEJ showed increasing levels of activity after birth, peaking at postnatal day 12 and then gradually decreasing along with age. Brain distribution analysis in adult animals showed that NHEJ activity is differentially distributed among different regions. We suggest that the DNA NHEJ system may be utilized in the postnatal brain for the repair of DNA double strand breaks introduced within the genome in the postnatal brain.     

The interplay between BRCA1 and 53BP1 influences death,aging, senescence and cancer

In proliferating cells DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are a common occurrence during DNA replication. DSB repair using homologous recombination is essential for the error-free repair of such breaks and proliferating cells require some level of HR activity for their viability. The BRCA1 tumour suppressor has an important role in this process and is believed to channel the DSBs into the HR pathway. The related 53BP1 gene is known to positively regulate repair of DSBs outside of S phase, but via the NHEJ pathway. Two new studies suggest a new role for 53BP1 as an inhibitor of HR [1], [2]. These genetic studies establish that 53BP1, but not other components of the NHEJ machinery, can inhibit the early resection step of HR. In cells defective for BRCA1, which is required for efficient HR, the balance between promoting and inhibiting HR is thrown towards inhibition. Simultaneous loss of 53BP1 can rescue the HR defect of BRCA1-defective cells and restore cellular viability. Here, I provide an overview of these studies and discuss their implications for tumourigenesis.     

New Insights into NHEJ Repair Processes in Prokaryotes

In eukaryotic cells, the repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) by the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway is critical for genome stability. Until recently it was assumed that this DSB repair pathway was restricted to the eukarya. However, a functionally homologous prokaryotic NHEJ repair apparatus has now been identified and characterised. In contrast to the complex eukaryotic system, bacterial NHEJ appears to require only two proteins, Ku and a multifunctional DNA ligase, which form a two-component repair complex at the termini of DSBs. Together, these DNA repair factors possess all of the break-recognition, end-processing and ligation activities required to facilitate the complex task of DSB repair, both in vitro and in vivo. Our recent findings lay the foundation for understanding the molecular mechanisms that co-ordinate the processing and joining of DSBs by NHEJ in bacteria and also provides a conceptual framework for delineating the end-processing reactions in eukaryotes.     

原核生物的NHEJ修复途径

DNA双链断裂(DSBs)是严重的DNA损伤形式之一,生物体对DSBs的修复可通过同源重组(HR)或非同源末端连接途径(NHEJ)进行。长期以来,人们普遍认为HR是细菌DSBs修复的惟一途径,但在分支杆菌和其它原核生物体内NHEJ途径的发现,使这一观念得以颠覆。最近的研究表明,细菌NHEJ修复系统是一个双组分系统,包含一个多功能的DNA连接酶(LigD)和DNA末端结合蛋白Ku,具有DSBs修复所需的断裂末段识别、末端加工和连接活性。重点综述细菌NHEJ修复系统的组成、结构以及生理功能。     

Catalytically inactive DNA ligase IV promotes DNA repair in living cells

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are induced by external genotoxic agents (ionizing radiation or genotoxins) or by internal processes (recombination intermediates in lymphocytes or by replication errors). The DNA ends induced by these genotoxic processes are often not ligatable, requiring potentially mutagenic end-processing to render ends compatible for ligation by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). Using single molecule approaches, Loparo et al. propose that NHEJ fidelity can be maintained by restricting end-processing to a ligation competent short-range NHEJ complex that ‘maximizes the fidelity of DNA repair’. These in vitro studies show that although this short-range NHEJ complex requires DNA ligase IV (Lig4), its catalytic activity is dispensable. Here using cellular models, we show that inactive Lig4 robustly promotes DNA repair in living cells. Compared to repair products from wild-type cells, those isolated from cells with inactive Lig4 show a somewhat increased fraction that utilize micro-homology (MH) at the joining site consistent with alternative end-joining (a-EJ). But unlike a-EJ in the absence of NHEJ, a large percentage of joints isolated from cells with inactive Lig4 occur with no MH – thus, clearly distinct from a-EJ. Finally, biochemical assays demonstrate that the inactive Lig4 complex promotes the activity of DNA ligase III (Lig3).     

Interacting proteins Rtt109 and Vps75 affect the efficiency of non-homologous end-joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

One of the key pathways for DNA double-stranded break (DSB) repair is the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway, which directly re-ligates two broken ends of DNA. Using a plasmid repair assay screen, we identified that the deletion strain for RTT109 had a reduced efficiency for NHEJ in yeast. This deletion strain also had a reduced efficiency to repair induced chromosomal DSBs in vivo. Tandem-affinity purification of Rtt109 recovered Vps75 as a physical interacting protein. Deletion of VPS75 was also shown to have an effect on the efficiency of NHEJ in both the plasmid repair and the chromosomal repair assays. In addition, deletion mutants for both RTT109 and VPS75 showed hypersensitivity to different DNA damaging agents. Our genetic interaction analysis supports a role for RTT109 in DNA damage repair. We propose that one function of the Rtt109-Vps75 interacting protein pair is to affect the efficiency of NHEJ in yeast. Vps75 but not Rtt109 also seem to have an effect on the efficiency of DSB repair using homologous recombination.     

Regulation of human polλ by ATM-mediated phosphorylation during non-homologous end joining

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) trigger a variety of cellular signaling processes, collectively termed the DNA-damage response (DDR), that are primarily regulated by protein kinase ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM). Among DDR activated processes, the repair of DSBs by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) is essential. The proper coordination of NHEJ factors is mainly achieved through phosphorylation by an ATM-related kinase, the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs), although the molecular basis for this regulation has yet to be fully elucidated. In this study we identify the major NHEJ DNA polymerase, DNA polymerase lambda (Polλ), as a target for both ATM and DNA-PKcs in human cells. We show that Polλ is efficiently phosphorylated by DNA-PKcs in vitro and predominantly by ATM after DSB induction with ionizing radiation (IR) in vivo. We identify threonine 204 (T204) as a main target for ATM/DNA-PKcs phosphorylation on human Polλ, and establish that its phosphorylation may facilitate the repair of a subset of IR-induced DSBs and the efficient Polλ-mediated gap-filling during NHEJ. Molecular evidence suggests that Polλ phosphorylation might favor Polλ interaction with the DNA-PK complex at DSBs. Altogether, our work provides the first demonstration of how Polλ is regulated by phosphorylation to connect with the NHEJ core machinery during DSB repair in human cells.     

Emerging models for DNA repair: Dictyostelium discoideum as a model for nonhomologous end-joining

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are a particularly cytotoxic variety of DNA lesion that can be repaired by homologous recombination (HR) or nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ). HR utilises sequences homologous to the damage DNA template to facilitate repair. In contrast, NHEJ does not require homologous sequences for repair but instead functions by directly re-joining DNA ends. These pathways are critical to resolve DSBs generated intentionally during processes such as meiotic and site-specific recombination. However, they are also utilised to resolve potentially pathological DSBs generated by mutagens and errors during DNA replication. The importance of DSB repair is underscored by the findings that defects in these pathways results in chromosome instability that contributes to a variety of disease states including malignancy. The general principles of NHEJ are conserved in eukaryotes. As such, relatively simple model organisms have been instrumental in identifying components of these pathways and providing a mechanistic understanding of repair that has subsequently been applied to vertebrates. However, certain components of the NHEJ pathway are absent or show limited conservation in the most commonly used invertebrate models exploited to study DNA repair. Recently, however, it has become apparent that vertebrate DNA repair pathway components, including those involved in NHEJ, are unusually conserved in the amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Traditionally, this genetically tractable organism has been exploited to study the molecular basis of cell type specification, cell motility and chemotaxis. Here we discuss the use of this organism as an additional model to study DNA repair, with specific reference to NHEJ.